A new study highlights a 'methodological blind spot' in the way sea level rise is measured.
Rising sea levels spurred by climate change may threaten tens of millions more people than scientists and government planners originally thought. A new study, released on 4 March, exposes mistaken research assumptions on how high coastal waters already are.
Researchers examined hundreds of scientific studies and hazard assessments, calculating that about 90 per cent of them underestimated baseline coastal water heights by an average of 30 centimetres, according to the study in the journal Nature. It's a far more frequent problem in the Global South, the Pacific and Southeast Asia, and less so in Europe and along Atlantic coasts.
The cause is a mismatch between the way sea and land altitudes are measured, says study co-author Philip Minderhoud, a hydrogeology professor at Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands.
'Methodological blind spot' in measuring coastal water levels
Minderhoud says this is a “methodological blind spot”. Each way measures their own areas properly, he says. But where sea meets land, there's a lot of factors that often don't get accounted for when satellites and land-based models are used.
Studies that calculate sea level rise impact usually “do not look at the actual measured sea level so they used this zero-metre” figure as a starting point, says lead author Katharina Seeger of the University of Padua in Italy. In some places in the Indo-Pacific, it's close to one metre, Minderhoud says.
One simple way to understand it is that many studies assume sea levels without waves or currents, when the reality at the water's edge is of oceans constantly roiled by wind, tides, currents, changing temperatures and things like El Niño, explain Minderhoud and Seeger.
Adjusting to a more accurate coastal height baseline means that if seas rise by a little more than 1 metre – as some studies suggest will happen by the end of the century – waters could inundate up to 37 per cent more land and threaten 77 million to 132 million more people, the study says.
That would trigger problems in planning and paying for the impacts of a warming world.
Sea level rise puts people at risk
"You have a lot of people here for whom the risk of extreme flooding is much higher than people thought,'' says Anders Levermann, a climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impacts Research in Germany, who wasn't part of the study. And Southeast Asia, where the study finds the biggest discrepancy, has the most people already threatened by sea level rise, he says.
Minderhoud points to island nations in that region as an area where the reality of discrepancy hits home.
For 17-year-old climate activist Vepaiamele Trief, the projections aren't abstract. On her island home in the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu, the shoreline has visibly retreated within her short lifetime, with beaches eroded, coastal trees uprooted and some homes now barely one metre from the sea at high tide.
On her grandmother’s island of Ambae, a coastal road from the airport to her village has been rerouted inland because of encroaching water. Graves have been submerged and entire ways of life feel under threat.
“These studies, they aren’t just words on a paper. They aren’t just numbers. They’re people’s actual livelihoods,” she says. “Put yourself in the shoes of our coastal communities – their lives are going to be completely overturned because of sea level rise and climate change.”
Paying attention to the starting point
This new study is pretty much about what is the truth on the ground.
Calculations that may be correct for the seas overall or for the land aren't quite right at that key intersection point of water and land, Seeger and Minderhoud says. It's especially true in the Pacific.
“To understand how much higher a piece of land is than the water, you need to know the land elevation and the water elevation. And what this paper says the vast majority of studies have done is to just assume that zero in your land elevation dataset is the level of the water. When in fact, it’s not,” says sea level rise expert Ben Strauss, CEO of Climate Central. His 2019 study was one of the few the new paper says got it right.
“It’s just the baseline that you start from that people are getting wrong," says Strauss, who wasn't part of the research.
Maybe not so bad, some scientists say
Other outside scientists say that Minderhoud and Seeger may be making too much of the problem
“I think they’re exaggerating the implications for impact studies a bit – the problem is actually well understood, albeit addressed in a way that could probably be improved,” says Gonéri Le Cozannet, a scientist at the French geological survey. Most local planners know their coastal issues and plan accordingly, Rutgers University sea level expert Robert Kopp says.
That's true in Vietnam in the high-impact area, Minderhoud says. They have an accurate sense of elevation, he says.
The findings come as a new UNESCO report warns of major gaps in understanding how much carbon the ocean absorbs. That report says that models differ by 10 per cent to 20 per cent in estimating the size of that carbon sink, raising questions about the accuracy of global climate projections that rely on them.
Together, the studies suggest governments may be planning for coastal and climate risks with an incomplete picture of how the ocean is changing.
“When the ocean comes closer, it takes away more than just the land we used to enjoy,” says Thompson Natuoivi, a climate advocate for Save the Children Vanuatu.
“Sea level rise is not just changing our coastline, it’s changing our lives. We are not talking about the future – we’re talking about the right now.”
