Showing posts sorted by date for query XIAOMI. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query XIAOMI. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, August 05, 2026

China draws up safety rules for autonomous vehicles

AFP
August 4, 2026

China has drawn up new rules for the growing autonomous vehicle industry – Copyright AFP/File Jade GAO

China has drawn up new safety rules for the growing number of autonomous vehicles on its roads, including a mandatory deactivation override, the government said Tuesday.

The standards taking effect July 1, 2027 will cover autonomous vehicles that require a human back-up driver, as well as independently operating vehicles such as the robotaxis made by US manufacturer Waymo.

Under the new rules, manufacturers will have to ensure autonomous systems can match the safety of human drivers, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said in a statement.

Buyers will also have to be informed of any limitations in autonomous systems.

The rules standardise interactions between humans and machines to “prevent risks of misuse or abuse”, the ministry said.

They will require that autonomous vehicles feature safe procedures to activate and deactivate automated driving, it said.

For cars with a human back-up driver, the autonomous system must monitor their readiness to take over.

Safety concerns and the cost of developing next-level systems have complicated progress in the introduction of of autonomous vehicles.

Beijing warned leading automakers that safety rules would be more tightly enforced after a fatal crash in 2025 involving a Xiaomi car in assisted driving mode.

The new rules follow a UN agency’s adoption in June of the first global regulations for fully autonomous vehicles, which China backed.

Sunday, July 26, 2026

 

Exploring the role of knowledge graphs and large language models in autonomous vehicle safety




Tsinghua University Press
The framework of the review 

image: 

 The framework and structure of this review

view more 

Credit: Communications in Transportation Research





In a new comprehensive review, researchers from Tsinghua University, Xiaomi EV, Beijing Institute of Technology, and University of Electronic Science and Technology of China examine how these two AI paradigms are being applied across the development, validation, and operation of autonomous driving systems, discuss their strengths and limitations, and further review their emerging synergy for more robust, interpretable, and trustworthy autonomous driving systems. 

The team published their study in Communications in Transportation Research (https://doi.org/10.26599/COMMTR.2026.9640023).

Two complementary AI paradigms for autonomous driving safety

Autonomous vehicles must operate in highly dynamic and uncertain traffic environments. Although recent advances in sensing and learning have improved perception and control, current systems still face major challenges in scene understanding, risk reasoning, rare scenario handling, and explainability.

In the study, the research team examined two important AI approaches with complementary strengths. Knowledge graphs represent structured knowledge such as traffic rules, object relationships, causal chains, and expert driving experience, enabling explicit reasoning and traceable decision support. Large language models, in contrast, are more flexible in semantic understanding, contextual generalization, and reasoning over open-ended situations.

Comparison and synergy of these two AI paradigms for autonomous driving safety

The review shows that knowledge graphs and large language models offer different advantages for autonomous driving safety. Knowledge graphs are well suited for organizing structured knowledge and supporting explicit, interpretable reasoning, especially in tasks involving traffic rules, causal relations, and expert knowledge. Large language models, in contrast, are more flexible in semantic understanding, contextual reasoning, and handling open-ended situations, which gives them strong potential in complex and uncertain traffic environments.

Rather than treating them as competing approaches, the study further highlights their growing synergy. Researchers are increasingly exploring how structured knowledge can improve the transparency and reliability of large language models, while the flexible reasoning ability of large language models can expand how knowledge graphs are queried, understood, and applied. This emerging combination points to a promising direction for building more robust, interpretable, and trustworthy autonomous driving systems.

DOI Link:

https://doi.org/10.26599/COMMTR.2026.9640023

About Communications in Transportation Research

Communications in Transportation Research was launched in 2021, with academic support provided by Tsinghua University and China Intelligent Transportation Systems Association. The Editors-in-Chief are Professor Xiaobo Qu, a member of the Academia Europaea from Tsinghua University, and Professor Xiaopeng (Shaw) Li from University of Wisconsin–Madison. The journal mainly publishes high-quality, original research and review articles that are of significant importance to emerging transportation systems, aiming to serve as an international platform for showcasing and exchanging innovative achievements in transportation and related fields, fostering academic exchange and development between China and the global community.

It has been indexed in SCIE, SSCI, Ei Compendex, Scopus, CSTPCD, CSCD, OAJ, DOAJ, TRID and other databases. It was selected as Q1 Top Journal in the Engineering and Technology category of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Journal Ranking List. In 2022, it was selected as a High-Starting-Point new journal project of the “China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan”. In 2024, it was selected as the Support the Development Project of “High-Level International Scientific and Technological Journals”. The same year, it was also chosen as an English Journal Tier Project of the “China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan Phase Ⅱ”. In 2024, it received the first impact factor (2023 IF) of 12.5, ranking Top1 (1/58, Q1) among all journals in "TRANSPORTATION" category. In 2026, its 2025 IF was announced as 12.7, maintaining the Top1 position (1/66, Q1) in the same category.

From Volume 6 (2026), Communications in Transportation Research will be published by Tsinghua University Press on the SciOpen platform with the official journal website at https://www.sciopen.com/journal/2097-5023. We kindly request that all new manuscript submissions be made through the journal’s submission system at https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/commtr. For any submission-related inquiries, please contact the Editorial Office at commtr_e@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.

Monday, July 06, 2026

How World Cup Ads Reflect The Shift In Global Manufacturing – Analysis

July 5, 2026 
Anbound
By Yang Xite

Since the start of this year’s World Cup, a highly notable shift has emerged on the stadium’s advertising boards. One can notice that the presence of Japanese manufacturing brands has visibly waned compared to the past. From the 1980s and 1990s through the turn of the century, Japanese companies were among the most ubiquitous sponsors of global sporting events such as the World Cup, the Olympics, and Formula 1. Brands such as Sony, Toshiba, Panasonic, Canon, Fujifilm, and JVC were long synonymous with televisions, cameras, VCRs, film, household appliances, and office equipment.

Back then, Japanese manufacturing possessed both the core technology and the end-consumer market. More importantly, it was a direct part of the daily lives of households worldwide. A mega-event like the World Cup, with its massive concentration of global viewers, was the perfect stage for Japanese consumer electronics and home appliance brands to flex their muscles. Today, however, a glance at the pitch-side ads reveals that the spotlight has largely shifted to service-sector brands from China, South Korea, and the United States, alongside capital from the Gulf states. While Japanese manufacturing still exists, it no longer commands the front row of the advertising hoardings.

ANBOUND’s founder Kung Chan believes that global manufacturing is undergoing a transition of momentum, and the conspicuous decline of Japanese manufacturing ads at the World Cup serves as a clear signal. Gone were the days when Japanese corporations completely dominated World Cup billboards. As one of the world’s premier showcases for global commercial power, the World Cup reflects deeper shifts. Companies willing to pay a premium for global exposure, those seeking to use the tournament to amplify their international presence, and those shifting away from mass-consumer branding all reflect broader changes in industrial structures, corporate strategies, and national competitiveness. The billboards may look like mere commercial marketing, but they reflect shifts in the power structure of manufacturing.


This shift is far from being an isolated phenomenon. According to statistics from fDi Intelligence, World Cup sponsorships were almost entirely dominated by American, Japanese, and Western European enterprises before 2006. Since then, however, the sponsorship structure has visibly pivoted eastward. At the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, the number of Asian sponsors surpassed that of Euro-American companies for the first time. Chinese corporate sponsorship accounted for a share comparable to that of U.S. companies for two consecutive tournaments, while Japanese sponsors were conspicuously absent. Looking at the 2026 World Cup, FIFA’s core partners include Hyundai-Kia, Lenovo, Coca-Cola, Visa, and Adidas, alongside the likes of Qatar Airways and Saudi Aramco. The emergence of Gulf enterprises like Qatar Airways and Saudi Aramco demonstrates that sports sponsorship is no longer just a corporate marketing tool. Instead, it now carries undertones of national image-shaping and the spillover of capital influence. By leveraging a global mega-event like the World Cup, Gulf states are packaging their energy wealth, aviation hubs, tourism services, and national brands together, transitioning from mere energy exporters into major players on the global commercial and cultural stage. This signifies that both the manufacturing representatives and the capital forces on the global business stage are changing. Where Japanese corporations once stood as the face of Asian manufacturing, Chinese electronics, South Korean automobiles, and emerging-market capital now occupy far more space.


It is worth noting that Japanese manufacturing has not simply collapsed. Rather, its center of gravity has undergone a major shift. In the past, Japan’s strength was on the consumer side. Products like televisions, cameras, audio-video recording equipment, home appliances, and automobiles faced ordinary consumers directly, making global exposure a natural necessity for these brands. Today, many Japanese enterprises have shifted to the mid-to-upstream segments of the industrial chain, concentrating heavily on semiconductor equipment, precision materials, industrial robots, machine tools, sensors, automotive components, and power devices. Companies like Tokyo Electron, Shin-Etsu Chemical, Murata Manufacturing, Keyence, Fanuc, and Yaskawa Electric remain vital to the global industrial chain. However, because their clients are primarily chip fabricators, automakers, and industrial firms, they do not need to repeatedly assert their presence in mass-consumer arenas like the World Cup. In other words, Japanese manufacturing has shifted from “selling to global consumers” to “selling to the global industrial chain”, moving from frontline branding to backstage technology.

There is a positive side to this as Japan maintains formidable barriers to entry in many high-end segments. In semiconductor materials and equipment, for instance, Japanese firms remain irreplaceable in fields such as photoresists, silicon wafers, inspection equipment, etching and deposition systems, and high-end components. The AI-driven semiconductor investment cycle also continues to offer opportunities for Japanese businesses. SEMI forecasts that global sales of semiconductor manufacturing equipment will grow from USD 133 billion in 2025 to USD 145 billion in 2026 and reach USD 156 billion by 2027, driven primarily by AI, high-end logic, memory, HBM, and advanced packaging. Taiwan, South Korea, and Mainland China remain the most critical regions for equipment investment. This indicates that the new momentum in global manufacturing no longer stems from traditional home appliances and consumer electronics but from chips, computing power, data centers, advanced packaging, AI servers, and high-end equipment, and these are the exact sectors where Japanese firms are still highly influential.


Yet, this is also where the problem lies. If manufacturing remains “backstage” for too long, its technical barriers may endure, but its global brand influence will inevitably wane. In the past, Japanese manufacturing represented a lifestyle: Sony for televisions, Canon for photography, JVC for video recording, Panasonic for home appliances, and Toshiba for office equipment. Today, the direct impression of Japanese manufacturing among many young consumers has faded; instead, they are far more familiar with brands like Apple, Samsung, BYD, Xiaomi, Hisense, TCL, Hyundai, and Kia. While Japanese enterprises still hold immense value deep within the supply chain, their brand aggressiveness on the consumer side is a shadow of its former self. For a manufacturing powerhouse, this is no trivial matter. Global competition in manufacturing is not just a battle over components; it is equally a competition over brands, channels, ecosystems, and consumer mindshare. Being an “indispensable supplier” is certainly important, but if it cannot continuously roll out products aimed at global consumers, its image as a manufacturing superpower will inevitably contract.

Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) admitted in its White Paper on International Economy and Trade 2025 that the volume of Japanese goods exported has declined and that the nation needs to develop new export goods, export enterprises, and export markets while increasing digital and service value-add. This effectively shows that Japan itself recognizes that its traditional export model is no longer sufficient. The dilemma facing Japanese manufacturing is not just about high costs, an aging population, or corporate conservatism. This also stems from product lifecycles being rewritten by new technologies. Japanese companies used to excel at perfecting hardware engineering, but they have generally been slow to react to smartphones, platform economy, software-defined vehicles, AI terminals, and digital services.

At the same time, Chinese manufacturing is becoming more and more noticeable. In the past, China acted primarily as the provider behind the scenes, such as supplying World Cup merchandise, jerseys, display screens, stadium seating, venue equipment, and construction machinery. The products were in the stadium, but the brands were not. Today, Chinese enterprises are entering the sponsorship frameworks, broadcasting systems, and global marketing arenas directly. Companies like Hisense, Mengniu, vivo, Wanda, and Lenovo have consecutively leveraged the World Cup to expand their international footprint. Behind this trend lies a transformation in Chinese manufacturing from exporting contract-manufactured goods to exporting brands, technology, and application scenarios. Chinese companies are no longer content with being mere suppliers. Instead, they want to build global brand recognition. Particularly in display equipment, major home appliances, smart terminals, new energy vehicles, power batteries, photovoltaics, and construction machinery, China has forged distinct advantages in scale, cost, supply chain integration, and iteration speed. This is the reason for the confidence that emboldens Chinese enterprises to step up to the advertising boards.

However, one should not jump to the simplistic conclusion that “Chinese manufacturing has won a total victory” merely because Japanese ads have dwindled and Chinese ads have multiplied. The reduction in Japanese manufacturing ads signals a retreat of its consumer-facing brands, but it does not mean its underlying technology has vanished. Conversely, the rise in ads from Chinese brands shows a stronger desire for globalization among Chinese firms, but it does not mean all core dependencies have been resolved. The most prominent advantages of Chinese manufacturing right now are scale and speed, while its shortcomings remain in foundational software, high-end industrial software, core equipment, advanced materials, precision components, global service networks, and brand trust. Especially in fields like semiconductors, aviation engines, high-end machine tools, medical devices, and industrial control systems, China still requires long-term accumulation. While advertising on billboards means more visibility, the deep recesses of the supply chain represent hard power. This distinction must be kept clearly in view.


South Korean manufacturing offers an alternative point of reference. The sustained presence of Hyundai-Kia within the World Cup sponsorship ecosystem demonstrates that South Korean enterprises have successfully held onto the global consumer brand lifeline. The hallmark of South Korean manufacturing is its ability to blend automobiles, electronics, entertainment, design, and national image. Samsung, Hyundai, Kia, and LG, coupled with K-pop, K-dramas, gaming, and K-beauty, collectively form South Korea’s outward-facing brand ecosystem. South Korea may not possess China’s manufacturing scale, nor Japan’s deep accumulation in materials and equipment, but it excels at packaging manufacturing into global consumer culture. This is a lesson worth learning for China. When Chinese enterprises venture abroad, they cannot rely solely on price and production capacity. What they must also address should include brand aesthetics, user experience, after-sales service, cultural communication, and localized operations. Otherwise, no matter how much is spent on advertising, it will remain difficult to truly crystallize into enduring global brands.

All in all, Kung Chan’s observation of manufacturing shifts through the lens of World Cup advertising offers a highly piercing entry point. World Cup billboards are not industrial reports, yet they visually display the shifting dynamics of global industrial power. Japanese manufacturing has largely receded into the backstage of the industrial chain, Chinese manufacturing is accelerating its journey to the forefront of global branding, South Korean manufacturing continues to fuse consumer brands with cultural exports, and the Gulf states are reshaping their national images through sports sponsorship. This evolution indicates that global manufacturing competition has expanded from pure product rivalry into a comprehensive contest encompassing technology, branding, capital, and national image.

Final analysis conclusion:

As the ads at the World Cup shift, the era of manufacturing is also changing. For China, being seen by global consumers is merely the first step. What matter the most is whether it can establish a firm foothold in core technologies, global services, brand trust, and supply chain organization. Billboards can let it being seen and heard, but a manufacturing superpower ultimately depends on the structural fortitude of its industrial system.


Yang Xite is a Research Fellow at ANBOUND, an independent think tank.

About Anbound
Anbound Consulting (Anbound) is an independent Think Tank with the headquarter based in Beijing. Established in 1993, Anbound specializes in public policy research, and enjoys a professional reputation in the areas of strategic forecasting, policy solutions and risk analysis. Anbound's research findings are widely recognized and create a deep interest within public media, academics and experts who are also providing consulting service to the State Council of China.

Thursday, July 02, 2026

Ferrari and BMW join Tesla, China in switch from copper to cheaper aluminum

Stock image.

Ferrari and BMW are rolling out new models featuring lightweight, cost-effective aluminum wiring, accelerating a shift away from copper, the dominant material in electric wiring since the invention of the electric ​battery two centuries ago.

The decisions follow similar moves by Tesla and Chinese EV makers and reflect a broader industry trend forecast to affect around 2% of global copper demand ‌this year, according to JPMorgan.

Even more copper could be switched to aluminum in the coming years because of a structural rise in copper prices, driven by shortages of the metal and with increased demand from the green-energy sector and data centres.

Companies across several sectors are migrating to aluminum because of far lower prices and comparable performance, according to Reuters interviews with 18 carmakers, cable and air conditioning companies, metals producers and consultants. Ferrari and BMW said they chose aluminum ​in part because of its lighter weight.

Substitution of aluminum for copper has come in waves over two decades, but record copper prices in late January, peaking close to $15,000 per metric ton, ​added weight to the case for switching to aluminum. Forecasts for global supply fall short of those for demand for more than the next decade.

Lighter and faster

Ferrari, which already uses aluminum for its bodies, engines and chassis, told Reuters it started using the lightweight metal for power cables on its 296 hybrid sports car last year. Ferrari has ​since introduced aluminum wiring into other models, including the Luce, its first ever EV launched last month.

The move saves up to 20% of the total wiring weight, said Ferrari communications executive Dario Esposito.

“We are not ​choosing aluminum because it’s cheaper, we choose the material that has better performance,” he said.

But the metal is, in fact, much cheaper — currently about $3,100 a ton, or about a quarter the price of copper.

Germany’s BMW said it first used aluminum conductors in 2011 in its subcompact 1 series and progressively expanded substitution in hybrids and EVs. Currently, it uses a large number of aluminum cables in both high and low-voltage systems in its latest eDrive EV technology, launched last ​year.

The world’s fourth-biggest automaker, Stellantis, also recently started swapping copper wiring for aluminum, according to an industry source familiar with the matter. Stellantis declined to comment.

Price versus performance

Chinese EV parts supplier JONVER has ​seen sales of aluminum wiring products jump this year to about 30% of its sales from about 20% in 2023, said sales director Feng Lu.

Norwegian aluminum producer Hydro said sales of aluminum heating-and-air tubing as a copper substitute ‌have steadily ⁠grown in recent years. Hydro CFO Trond Olaf Christophersen said the company expects to gain market share as aluminum rapidly replaces copper in the sector in future years.

Xavier Mathieu at France-based Nexans, the world’s second-biggest cable manufacturer, said manufacturers will still buy copper at higher prices because it performs better in certain applications — but they start buying aluminum when copper prices reach about 3.5 times higher.

Copper prices currently stand at more than 4.2 times the price of aluminum.

Several issues complicate firms’ decisions to swap, including US tariffs and the huge amount of energy needed to produce aluminum , which means more greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, ​aluminum is cheap but less efficient: It requires ​more aluminum to conduct the same amount of ⁠electricity.

Still, JPMorgan outlined a scenario in which about 6% of annual demand for copper might be replaced by aluminum by 2030, compared to 2% this year.

China EV makers take the lead

The government in the world’s biggest metals consumer, China, encouraged companies to make the switch to aluminum in a March 2025 ​policy paper seen by Reuters, and many have heeded the call.

Analysts at consultancy Zhuochuang forecast that about 25% to 30% of components currently made ​from copper, by metal volume, ⁠could be switched to aluminum in the power, automotive and home-appliance sectors by 2030.

Chinese EV makers that have switched to aluminum wiring include AVATR, XPeng and Xiaomi, said Terry Woychowski, president at engineering consultancy Caresoft Global, which takes apart vehicles and examines their components.

The three Chinese EV makers and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.

Lightweight aluminum is especially attractive to EV makers because cutting weight allows for longer driving ranges. And ⁠saving money is ​crucial for EV firms in China, where a price war has left margins razor-thin. And aluminum has ample room to ​gain ground in autos, where about 85% of electrical wiring busbars, which connect an EV’s battery to its systems, are still copper, according to Hydro.

The Chinese auto industry has benchmarked Tesla, a pioneer in using aluminum for wiring when it introduced its ​Model Y in 2019, and more recently in its Cybertruck, Woychowski added.

(By Eric Onstad, Amy Lv, Ju-min Park and Kalea Hall; Editing by Veronica Brown and Claudia Parsons)

Wednesday, June 03, 2026

 

Asia’s EV race speeds up as China’s champions challenge Tesla

Asia’s EV race speeds up as China’s champions challenge Tesla
/ IntelliNewsFacebook
By Mark Buckton in Taipei June 2, 2026

Electric vehicle adoption across South, East and South-East Asia is accelerating, but the region’s transition is increasingly being shaped by domestic industrial policy, Chinese manufacturers and the slow build-out of charging infrastructure rather than by Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) alone – the efforts of Elon Musk notwithstanding.

As of mid-2026, China remains the centre of gravity in the EV world.

The country accounts for the overwhelming majority of Asia’s EV sales and continues to set the pace for manufacturing, battery development and charging networks. Yet even within China, the market is changing rapidly. Reporting by Caixin noted that sales momentum weakened after subsidy reductions and changes to tax incentives, exposing how dependent parts of the industry remain on government support. The same reports point to domestic vehicle sales in China falling sharply in early 2026 as consumers adjusted to the new policy environment.

This is, in part, down to Tesla remaining a significant force in China but even the world’s most iconic EV maker is facing intensifying pressure from domestic Chinese rivals.

BYD (SHE: 002594) has overtaken the US group as the world’s largest EV seller in terms of volume of sales, while manufacturers such as Geely, Wuling (HKG: 0305), Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto and Xiaomi (HKG: 1810) continue to gain market share. The South China Morning Post reported recently that low-cost models from Geely and Wuling have of late become some of China’s best-selling EVs, reflecting growing demand for affordable vehicles rather than premium – read: Tesla – imports.

BYD’s strategy to expand its footprint increasingly extends beyond vehicle sales. Reuters reported that the firm is expanding deployment of its assisted-driving technology while investing heavily in autonomous-driving chips and software. Tesla, meanwhile, continues to wait for broader regulatory approvals for some advanced driver-assistance functions in China and it is likely only a matter of time before claims of protectionism arise.

South Korea meanwhile presents a much different picture. The country already possesses extensive charging infrastructure coupled in large part to a mature automotive sector led by Hyundai and Kia – global motoring brands. Tesla in Korea remains one of the strongest-selling imported brands, but Chinese-made EVs are rapidly establishing a solid foothold. Because of this, industry discussions reported by Korean market observers have suggested that Chinese-built vehicles - including Teslas manufactured in China - and models from BYD, are capturing a growing share of imports.

In comparison, neighbouring Japan remains a relative laggard in EV adoption. Consumer demand has been slower than in China or South Korea, while domestic manufacturers have continued to focus heavily on hybrids and there has been some pushback against all-out EVs. However, charging networks are expanding gradually, but battery-electric vehicles still represent a comparatively small share of overall sales.

Chinese brands, for political reasons even if this is denied, have made limited inroads, although competition is expected to intensify as lower-cost imports arrive.

On the subcontinent, India represents one of Asia’s most important long-term growth opportunities. New Delhi has introduced manufacturing incentives, tax breaks and support schemes designed to create a domestic EV ecosystem. This has seen local manufacturers including Tata Motors and Mahindra & Mahindra ( a firm also making headway across Asia with its petrol-powered vehicles) establish strong positions, while global and Chinese brands seek entry into the market although politics again is likely to play a role in keeping them out for a while at least.

The challenge in India though remains infrastructure. Analysis shared through India’s automotive community highlights the reality that public charging availability remains well behind vehicle sales growth, and while demand is expanding quickly in some of India’s biggest cities, charger deployment is struggling to keep pace.

Elsewhere in South Asia, adoption remains uneven. Pakistan is pursuing EV policies and assembly projects but faces infrastructure constraints and electricity supply challenges. Bangladesh meanwhile is witnessing growth in electric two-wheelers and three-wheelers rather than passenger cars. Sri Lanka and Nepal are seeing increasing EV imports, supported by lower fuel-import costs and a raft of government incentives, although, like India and other nations on the subcontinent, charging networks remain few and far between.

Southeast Asia on the other hand has emerged as one of the most competitive EV battlegrounds on the continent. Thailand has become a regional manufacturing hub, attracting major investment from BYD, Great Wall Motor and other Chinese groups. As a result, Bangkok has backed adoption through tax incentives and support for local production. Because of this, Chinese brands now dominate much of Thailand’s EV market.

Vietnam is pursuing a more nationally focused strategy through domestic champion VinFast – a brand now seen increasingly across Asia. The company has rapidly expanded charging infrastructure and established a nationwide presence, making Vietnam one of the few countries in the region where a local brand is leading the transition – for now.

To the south, Indonesia with the largest population in Southeast Asia, is perhaps the most strategically important market. The government has recently sought to leverage the country’s vast nickel reserves to build a complete EV supply chain, from mining through battery production and vehicle assembly. Reporting by The Jakarta Post on this has highlighted how Jakarta’s industrial strategy is increasingly tied to battery manufacturing and downstream nickel processing.

In turn, the country is also investing heavily in its own charging infrastructure and analysts cited by Indonesia’s state-owned news agency Antara claim that government incentives tied to nickel-based batteries are intended to deepen domestic industrial integration while at the same time strengthening the broader EV ecosystem.

Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines are all making progress but are moving at different speeds. Singapore has developed one of the region’s most ambitious charging roll-outs, backed by strong government policy and urban planning. Malaysia to the north is expanding public charging corridors while attracting manufacturing investment, and the Philippines is playing catch-up, but is seeing rising interest in electrification, particularly in the form of public transportation fleets. Displacement of the nation’s roughly 250,000 jeepneys will take some doing though.

Mixed into all of this across the region is the position of Tesla which can be summarised as ‘mixed’ at best. The company retains considerable brand value thanks to the ever present PR surrounding its CEO – and to some extent remains influential in some areas, notably Taiwan.

However, Tesla is increasingly confronting rivals that combine lower prices, local manufacturing and extensive state support – and losing.

BYD’s scale, Geely’s budget offerings and the emergence of new Chinese technology-focused manufacturers have fundamentally altered the competitive landscape of Asia vis-a-vis EV sales. Reports from Reuters, Caixin and regional media to this end thus suggest the centre of gravity in Asia’s EV market is shifting away from Tesla and decisively towards Chinese brands – the result being an Asian EV transition that looks markedly different from the one envisioned a decade ago.


China’s BYD captures 35% of Africa EV market, as latecomer rival Tesla bets on Morocco

China’s BYD captures 35% of Africa EV market, as latecomer rival Tesla bets on Morocco
/ bne IntelliNewsFacebook
By Brian Kenety June 3, 2026

Chinese automaker BYD Company Ltd (SZSE:002594; HKEX:1211) has significantly strengthened its presence in Africa’s emerging electric vehicle (EV) market, increasing its market share to 35% in 2025 from just 4% two years prior, according to the Global EV Outlook 2026 report, published by the International Energy Agency (IEA), which predicts a continental bump in sales owing to the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

China’s biggest carmaker, pure-play EV manufacturer – and now the world’s biggest EV maker by unit sales – aims to sell 1.3mn cars outside of its home market in 2026, which would represent an increase of nearly 25% from its 2025 overseas sales. While Asian and Latin American markets are the main focus on its expansion drive, BYD is targeting sales several African countries, including by building charging station infrastructure.

In major electric car markets, such as Europe and the United States, the share of Chinese imports in sales is still relatively limited due to trade measures, consumer preferences and large domestic electric car manufacturing capacity. But “outside these two major markets, Chinese imports accounted for 55% of electric car sales in 2025, up from about 10% in 2021”, the report says, and many countries in Africa now “import more than 80% of their electric cars from China”.

A prolonged high oil price environment is likely to boost the outlook for EV sales in Africa. In emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), increased gasoline and diesel prices have a larger impact on household incomes since average incomes are lower compared to advanced economies. And so “oil-importing EMDEs across the world have some of the strongest incentives to implement policies to further speed up electric car adoption,” the report notes.

Electric vehicle adoption across Africa remains concentrated in a small number of markets despite rapid recent growth, with regional electric car sales rising from about 4,000 units in 2023 to roughly 25,000 in 2025.

Last year, Egypt led the continent in total EV sales with around 7,900 units sold, followed by Morocco with 5,500 and South Africa with 3,800. Together, the three countries accounted for nearly 70% of Africa’s total electric vehicle sales during the year.

Buying a brand new EV is not cheap, even for many African markets with slightly better disposable income,” Nigeria-based outlet TechCabal commented on the report’s finding. “BYD has intentionally targeted that group by shipping cheaper EV models in markets like Egypt and South Africa, undercutting competitors like Maxus and Toyota, which recently introduced an EV in the market.”

Morocco emerges as Africa’s EV manufacturing hub, focus of BYD’s main rival, Tesla

US electric vehicle maker Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) officially entered the Moroccan market in February, with a launch event in AnfaPlace Mall in Casablanca, showcasing two of its best-selling models, the Tesla Model 3 and Tesla Model Y, alongside home charging solutions.

Morocco has consolidated its position as Africa’s largest automotive manufacturing hub, producing 559,645 vehicles in 2024 (up 5% year on year) and projected to exceed 600,000 units in 2025, according to industry estimates. Output growth contrasts with a 5% y/y decline in South Africa last year (599,755 vehicles), historically the region’s dominant producer.

The North African country also hosts early electric vehicle assembly activity through Chinese and European manufacturers, providing a modest but established EV-production base. By comparison, South Africa – birthplace of Telsa’s chief executive Elon Musk – reports no local production of fully electric vehicles; the auto sector is still oriented towards internal-combustion and hybrid models.

Morocco’s logistics advantages include short shipping routes to European markets and lower transport costs. Policymakers have pursued an expansive EV-sector strategy that includes tax exemptions, reduced import duties, and broad public-charging deployment, with close to 1,000 charging points nationwide.

“Its proximity to Europe — South Africa’s largest target market for exported vehicles — gives Morocco a geographical advantage in terms of supply chains and shipping fees. The country is also ahead of South Africa in EV production, producing 40,000 to 50,000 units in 2024, with plans to increase this. South Africa has not yet produced a single fully electric car,” writes south Africa-based MyBroadband.

Meanwhile, BYD has announced plans to expand its dealership network in South Africa to 35 locations by the first quarter of 2026, having initially set an end of year target. The Chinese company also plans to deploy between 200 and 300 fast-charging stations in Africa’s most industrialised country by the end of 2026. Meanwhile, Chinese OEM Sany is planning to expand production in South Africa.

In December, Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, South Africa’s state-owned electricity utility responsible for power generation, transmission and distribution, formalised a partnership with BYD Auto South Africa, to expand the country’s public EV charging network.

The cooperation is anchored in a Memorandum of Cooperation signed earlier in 2025, setting out joint objectives to support EV infrastructure development and broaden market uptake. BYD reaffirmed its commitment to the agreement during the launch in Johannesburg of its Sealion 5 Super Plug-in Hybrid SUV, priced from ZAR499,900 (about $26,700), positioning it below many plug-in hybrid electric vehicles currently on sale, which are often priced above ZAR600,000 (around $32,000).

Uganda and Kenya lead Africa’s electric motorcycle growth

Globally, two- and three-wheelers (2/3Ws) remained the most electrified road transport segment in 2025, with about 10% of the global fleet now electric, according to the Global EV Outlook 2026. Sales of electric 2/3Ws increased almost 15% to reach 11mn globally in 2025, representing around 15% of total 2/3W sales. Swapping systems for 2/3Ws are deployed in several African countries, including Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda.

“Sales of electric 2Ws have grown markedly in Africa, from less than 1 000 in 2020 to around 70 000 in 2025,”the report says. “The use of 2Ws for ride-hailing, delivery and other commercial applications – where purchase decisions are especially cost-sensitive – has helped drive up the sales of electric 2Ws, especially in countries such as Uganda and Kenya. Battery-swapping is also being deployed to support the uptake of electric 2Ws used for commercial services in some markets in Africa.”

Uganda has become one of Africa’s fastest-growing markets for electric 2Ws, with sales exceeding 30,000 in 2025, having risen sharply from a low base in 2024. “Key to growth was the rapid scale-up of financing programmes for 2W purchases, led by Kenya-headquartered Spiro, which reported a large rollout in 2025, supported by an expanding battery-swapping network,” the report said.

“Zembo Motorcycles, a company focused on electric 2Ws, which provides battery swaps, secured $1mn in funding from the Dutch entrepreneurial development bank FMO in order to acquire batteries and chargers. Policy measures have complemented private-sector scaling. Uganda’s national e‑mobility agenda includes fiscal incentives intended to attract investment in domestic assembly and manufacturing, including income tax holidays and VAT exemptions for eligible domestically manufactured electric vehicles (EVs) and charging-related equipment.”

In Kenya, high gasoline prices relative to electricity prices, combined with the large share of the population with reliable access to electricity, make a strong economic case for electric 2Ws, the report said. “As a result, year-on-year electric 2W sales more than tripled in 2025, reaching over 25 000 and representing around 15% of new 2W registrations. This rapid growth occurred even despite relatively limited policy support, although in 2025 the government confirmed that domestically assembled electric models would continue to be VAT exempt.”

In South Africa, however, fully electric vehicle sales still represented less than 1% of total new-car sales in 2025. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) recorded stronger momentum, accounting for more than 70% of total electric vehicle sales in the country.

Smaller but growing EV markets are also emerging in Ethiopia, Mauritius, Rwanda and Nigeria, reflecting increasing government support, fuel-import pressures and expanding interest in lower-cost electric mobility solutions.

Africa’s used-car market complicates EV transition

At the same time, Africa’s automotive market remains heavily dependent on used vehicle imports from major producing economies including Germany, Japan and the United States. Industry estimates suggest around 60% of annual additions to Africa’s vehicle stock consist of imported used cars, complicating efforts to accurately measure EV adoption across the continent.

Analysts say official registration and sales data often fail to distinguish between new electric vehicles, used imports and so-called zero-mileage exports, making comparisons across African markets difficult.

Ethiopia illustrates the data challenge. Estimates suggest cumulative retail sales of new EVs between 2021 and 2025 totalled only slightly above 2,000 units. However, Ethiopia’s vehicle licensing authority has reported cumulative electric-car sales of around 15,000 units between 2022 and 2024, claiming roughly half of all new cars sold in 2024 were electric.

Domestic manufacturing initiatives are also beginning to emerge. Neo Motors, Morocco’s domestic automaker, launched sales of its first electric model at the start of 2026 as the country seeks to position itself as a regional EV production hub alongside its expanding automotive export industry.