Tuesday, May 13, 2025

L’Chaim! Two Jews with Opposing Views



 May 9, 2025
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

L’Chaim” is the Hebrew toast “To Life!” It’s also the name of a radio show, which is fitting as “L’Chaim” is more than an invitation to share a schnapps, but perhaps a whole life (see Fiddler on the Roof), or at least a friendly conversation about serious things.

And a friendly conversation about serious things is what we had on “L’Chaim Jewish Radio” live on the WCAP 980 AM airwaves. Or you could call it a passionate but polite debate, since L’Chaim’s host – longtime New England Jewish community activist Jim Shainker – and I are in diametric disagreement on almost everything regarding Israel and Palestine, Hamas and Likud, war and peace, and the “Zionist Colonial Project.”

Lazy lefty that I am, I prefer preaching to the choir, and I’d much rather make love not war. But occasionally I enjoy sparring with the opposition, especially for a worthy cause (and what is worthier than peace and a free Palestine?), and especially over a drink. In this case, it being 7am (PST), the drink was freshly brewed coffee, heavily spiked with coconut milk.

I felt like I was entering enemy territory through my cousin Jimmy’s living room. Jim and I bonded over our Jewish roots, notably our mutual admiration for my old rabbi, the late great Gerald Wolpe, the Zero Mostel of Philadelphia’s Har Zion Temple, who presided over my entire Judaic youth as well as my wedding to Max 33 years ago. Max also loved Rabbi Wolpe mainly because, upon hearing that Max (a Jewish convert) was uncircumcised, he shrugged his big heimish shoulders as if to say, “Don’t worry, I won’t cut you,” causing Max to exhale with great relief. I also just found out Rabbi Wolpe was the primary caregiver for his beloved aphasia-stricken wife – an eerily similar relationship to mine with Max who also just had a stroke, and now has aphasia – and I can almost hear Rabbi Wolpe’s resonant baritone guiding the two of us through the darkness of these times.

Back to L’Chaim, where I mentioned a Jewish social club near Yale’s campus called Shabtai where I gave a talk 20 years ago about the Biblical heroineQueen Esther during the now-legendary Sex Week at Yale (ah memories). Back then, Shabtai felt like a lively, open-minded salon fostering a free-ranging exchange of ideas over latkes and slivovitz – L’Chaim! Two decades later, I realized that Shabtai had taken a hard turn to the right – or maybe I was just getting “woke” to what it was –  when I found in my inbox an invitation to a Shabtai “lunch” with none other than Israel’s infamous Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben Gvir.

Yes, that Ben Gvir (and no, I didn’t go) – Netanyahu’s right-hand hardliner, a man whose hands are dripping with so much blood, Lady Macbeth herself would tell him to take a shower and a long, hard look in the mirror. Most tragically, a great deal of that blood belongs to innocent Palestinians, slaughtered by Israeli bombs and starvation.

“It’s a Shonda!” I cried, using the Hebrew word for “shame” to describe the Netanyahu regime and all of Israel’s monstrous assault on the Palestinian people.

“No, it’s not a Shonda!” Jim retorted, trying to defend Israel with all the heart and heimishness he could muster, though I could sense some wobble in his position. At least, he professed to dislike Netanyahu, and he joined me in condemning the Zionist thugs who harassed and assaulted lone female pro-Palestine protestors and passers-by on the streets of Brooklyn after Ben Gvir’s inflaming appearance.

Still, how could he defend what I called the Zionist Colonialist Project – punishing the Palestinians for the sins of the Nazis, serving as a military outpost for America (another colonialist project), confiscating native lands and building an apartheid society – even with so-called liberals running the government? In addition to being horrified as a human, I felt embarrassed as a Jew, stung by this sense of collective mortification for the sins of my murderous Zionist brethren.

“And no, I’m not a self-hating Jew,” I assured Jim. “In fact, I’m very self-loving, and tis the Season of Self-Love! Happy M Month (I didn’t say “Masturbation Month” – as I didn’t want to be censored over sex on a show about Israel’s war crimes)! Give yourself a hand. And stop stealing land.”

“They’re not stealing land!” Jim protested.

I honestly wish Jim was right, but there are numerous documentaries about Zionist settlers’ land theft, violence, arson and further misbehavior, including our friend, the amazing Abby Martin’s Gaza Fights for Freedom and many more since then. Israeli settlers help themselves to Palestinian land, homes, farms and olive groves like they’re on a government-subsidized, army-defended shopping spree – and they are! What they can’t steal, they blow up… with US-taxpayer-financed explosives. Jim wasn’t buying what I was saying, but he did let me say it on his program. Seems we also have a common interest in Free Speech.

Which brings me to where Jim found me: on another WCAP show, Active Radio hosted by the delightful Hartley Pleshaw, where I delivered my 5th annual State of the Sexual Unionaddress and talked about the bonobos who show us the way to peace through pleasure, as opposed to war for profit or, in the case of Zionist Israel vs. Palestine, genocide for profit. In between segments about caretaking Max and taking Zuck the Cuck to court, I expressed my rising support for a Free Palestine and loathing for Bibi and Don the Con’s Trumpocalyptic plans for a Gaza Trump Plaza on their Gaza Riviera built on the bones of slaughtered Palestinians.

At this point, Jim texted in to *correct* me, saying “Israel is at war with Hamas, not the Palestinian people.”

Oh, please.

With a heavy heart (I was there to talk about making love, not war… sort of), I replied that over 100,000 dead and wounded Palestinians would beg to disagree, pretty much dismissing Jim’s critique as “the standard Zionist hasbara” (propaganda) and doubling down on my disgust with Israel’s ongoing slaughter of Palestinians in their homes, schools and hospitals, as well as social media’s censorship of pro-Palestine views. I also unsubtly mentioned my Judaic credentials (I’m a Jewish Bloc/k for Palestine, baby!), and Jim invited me onto his show. He is, after all, a nice Jewish liberal.  Yes, liberals may have paved the way for our current authoritarian nightmare, but where there is liberalism, there is hope – and usually, a fairly well-stocked bar – L’Chaim!

So… I went on Jim’s show and had the conversation my Zionist friends and relatives will never have with me – or at least, the beginning of such a conversation. I listened and tried to understand Jim when he spoke, and he listened to me. At least, he seemed to be listening, and not just wondering if his Zionist sponsors or in-laws were listening. We didn’t interrupt each other very often – especially for two Jews with such opposing views.

I imagine it will disappoint most people I know for opposing reasons. My Zionist family members and old friends now living in Israel will be mortified that I openly expressed such pro-Palestine views at all, let alone on a Jewish show (if they read my articles and listened to my own shows, they’d be more mortified). On the other side, my pro-Palestine friends will feel I wasn’t hard enough on Jim for supporting blood-drenched Israel’s “right to exist” or “the Israeli people” who elected Netanyahu whose definition of that “right” includes perpetrating a genocide. Or maybe they feel I shouldn’t even go on an Israel-supportive show like L’Chaim. While I respect that opinion, I don’t share it. Jim isn’t a war criminal, and I’m not a firebrand; I’m a sex therapist with pro-bonobo tendencies and an ardent desire to get the “free Palestine” message heard.

And Jim did let me have the last word. After dispelling another stubbornly lingering bit of Zionist hasbara that Hamas had burned Israeli babies in ovens on October 7, 2023 (it never happened!), I made sure to tell the L’Chaim Jewish Radio audience that, just in case they haven’t seen the numerous horrific photos and videos:

“Babies are being burned in Gaza [by Israel].”

And then, our time was up. “Wonderful to talk to you,” boomed congenial Jim before inviting me back for a future round. It’s not like holding peace talks in Qatar, but “L’Chaim” made me feel that dialogues can develop, and that someday (hopefully before it’s too late), the Bonobo Way of peace through pleasure can prevail over perma-war for profit, and that Palestine will be free. And maybe so will “wandering Jews” like me… and Jim.

It’s a drop in the bloody bucket of hasbara, but perhaps speaking directly to American Jewish communities like those served by L’Chaim Jewish Radio could help shift public opinion toward a lasting ceasefire in Gaza, a rejection of Zionist apartheid and a more evolved and dare-I-say *respected* Jewish people around the world.

To life! To friendly conversations on serious topics and a Free FREE Palestine.

Listen to L’Chaim: 2 Jews with Opposing Views on DrSusanBlock.com or Bonoboville YouTube.

Susan Block, Ph.D., a.k.a. “Dr. Suzy,” is a world renowned LA sex therapist, author of The Bonobo Way: The Evolution of Peace through Pleasure and horny housewife, occasionally seen on HBO and other channels. For information and speaking engagements, call 626-461-5950. Email her at drsusanblock@gmail.com  

Israel’s Continuing Defiance of International Law and Contempt for Palestinian Lives



 May 9, 2025
Facebook

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

“In the beginning was the word,” John 1:1 commences like Genesis, connecting the God of Israel to the word. And the deliverance of the word is confirmed by the Ten Commandments being physically handed to Moses and the Israelites, legend has it, on Mount Sinai. It was a defining moment in Jewish reverence for words and the law. But much has changed since those Biblical times.

The United Nations General Assembly (GA) asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to give a non-binding advisory opinion on Israel’s obligations to facilitate aid into Palestinian territory. Starting April 28, for one week, diplomats and lawyers from 40 countries and three multilateral organizations argued in the Hague to try to force Israel to allow aid to enter. Once again Israel chose to ignore the ICJ, considered the World Court. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar called it “another shameful proceeding” meant to delegitimize Israel.

How to understand Israel’s continuing defiance of international law, including its blockade of aid to Palestinians? Since March 2, 2025, Israel has cut off all supplies to the 2.3 million people still trapped in the Gaza Strip. Stockpiles of food have virtually run out. “It’s about the survival of millions of Palestinians,” Alain Pellet, an advocate for Palestine and an eminent French professor and international lawyer, pleaded before the Court.

The hearings were technical, legal arguments about Israel’s obligations as the occupying power in Gaza and the West Bank and as a member of the United Nations. The precise title of the hearings was “Obligations of Israel in relation to the Presence and Activities of the United Nations, Other International Organizations and Third States in and relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” The GA demand for an advisory opinion resulted from the October 2024 Israeli parliament’s vote that prohibits the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) from operating in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

U.N. legal counsel Elinor Hammarskjöld said Israel has clear obligations as an occupying force to facilitate aid under international humanitarian law. “These obligations,” she said, “entail allowing all relevant U.N. entities to carry out activities for the benefit of the local population.”

Other experts agreed. “Israel must facilitate full, rapid, safe and unhindered humanitarian provision to the population of Gaza, including food, water and electricity, and must ensure access to medical care in accordance with international humanitarian law,” Sally Langrish, legal director and advisor at the UK’s foreign office, argued, specifically citing articles 59 and 55 of the Fourth Geneva Convention that outlines the obligations of an occupying power. “The occupying power must facilitate relief schemes by all means at its disposal,” she added. “This obligation is unconditional.”

Already in July 2024, the ICJ had ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories including the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Jerusalem was illegal under international law. In an advisory opinion, the Court ordered Israel to end its occupying presence as well as to make reparations for damages done. “This illegality relates to the entirety of the Palestinian territory occupied by Israel in 1967,” the court said in a statement.

Not having followed the 2024 ICJ opinion about its occupation, how does Israel now justify not allowing aid into the occupied territories? Israel maintains that UNRWA should not be allowed to function. In January 2024, Israel accused 12 UNRWA workers of involvement in the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks. However, a UN investigation of the accusations, published in April 2024, found no evidence of wrongdoing. The report noted that Israel had not responded to requests for names and information or given evidence of any previous concerns about UNRWA. UNRWA has denied these accusations, saying there is “absolutely no ground for a blanket description of ‘the institution as a whole’ being ‘totally infiltrated.’”

My former colleague and former Secretary-General of the Institute of International Law, Marcelo Kohen, representing Jordan, pleaded before the Court that, “Israel’s primary obligation is to respect the Palestinian’s people’s right to self-determination.” That is, Israel should not “hinder the realization of this right, to adopt all necessary and measures to protect the Palestinian civilian population.”  According to Kohen, Israel, cannot obstruct the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, a right confirmed by GA Resolution 78/192 of December 2023.

On the other side, the U.S. argued that “There are serious concerns about UNRWA’s impartiality, including information that Hamas has used UNRWA facilities and that UNRWA staff participated in the 7 October terrorist attack against Israel,” according to Josh Simmons, of the U.S. State Department legal team. “Given these concerns, it is clear that Israel has no obligation to permit UNRWA specifically to provide humanitarian assistance. UNRWA is not the only option for providing humanitarian assistance in Gaza,” he added. Israel boycotted the hearings but submitted written objections. (The U.S. and Hungary were the only countries that supported Israel’s position before the Court.)

What are the constraints on an occupying power? According to a U.S. State Department legal adviser; “An occupational power retains a margin of appreciation concerning which relief schemes to permit. Even if an organisation offering relief is an impartial humanitarian organisation, and even if it is a major actor, occupation law does not compel an occupational power to allow and facilitate that specific actor’s relief operations.”

But Marcelo Kohen and the renown international jurist and legal scholar Georges Abi-Saab refuted this argument in a commentary in EJIL TALK!: “When occupation ceases to be a provisional factual situation and turns into an open-ended political project, the rules of military occupation no longer apply… The protection afforded to the civilian population, the territory, and its resources is then governed – more comprehensively – by other bodies of international law, notably international human rights law, the right to self-determination, and the right to humanitarian assistance, none of which permit derogation in the name of military necessity or the security interests of the occupying power.”

In addition to the legal questions about Israel’s blocking aid and its obligations as an occupying power, there are larger legal and moral questions about Israel’s actions since October 7, 2023. Already in January 2024, The ICJ found it “plausible” that Israel had committed acts that violate the Genocide Convention. The Court’s president, Joan Donoghue, delivered a provisional order that Israel must ensure, “with immediate effect,” that its forces not commit any of the acts prohibited by the Convention. (Just recently, on May 4, 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel, once again, is “on the eve of a forceful entry to Gaza.”)

Furthermore, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant against the Israeli Prime Minister on November 21, 2024, for being “Allegedly responsible for the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024.”

As far as the United States’ continuing complicity with Israel is concerned, during an early April 2025 drop by to the White House, Netanyahu said; “This was a very productive visit, a very warm visit…” “[W]arm visit” to Washington by someone “Allegedly responsible for the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”?

(As a reminder about Trump and respect for the law: He swore on January 20, 2025, “I, Donald John Trump, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” When asked in a recent television interview whether, as president, he needed to “uphold the Constitution of the United States,” Trump replied, “I don’t know.”)

Israel, a self-proclaimed Jewish state, should be an example of respect for the rule of law. Its defiance of the ICJ and ICC, and continuing alliance with the United States’ non-respect for the rule of law is contrary to all the country claims to be as well as contrary to the very foundations of its religious and cultural heritage.

Daniel Warner is the author of An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations. (Lynne Rienner). He lives in Geneva.