Thursday, October 30, 2025

 

The kids are smarter than you think





University of Montreal




Young chimpanzees are remarkably innovative, inventing tools and improving on ones that adults use - and this technical know-how could hold the key to better appreciating the role of children in the evolution of all cultures, including ours.

That's what scientists led by an anthropologist at Université de Montréal conclude in a new study.

Published in the Nature journal Scientific Reports, the paper explores the tool-making skills of three dozen immature chimps at the Ngogo research site in Kibale National Park, a heavily forested area in southwestern Uganda where a large population of chimps live in the wild.  

"This paper is about evolution of culture in humans, using chimps as a model of comparison, and the take-home message is that children could be more important figures in cultural evolution than previously thought," said Bădescu, an associate professor of anthropology at UdeM.

"At their stage of development kids are allowed to be creative and to explore. They can experiment with tools and objects and this leads to new and innovative ways of using them. It introduces variation into the repertoire of skills that adults can pick up on, and that's how culture evolves."

In Uganda, where she spent much her time studying chimps, Bădescu has observed that kids intelligently used moss as a sponge tool to soak up and drink water, for instance.

"We don't often think of kids as being the innovators of technology, but they can indeed be important," Bădescu said. "For anyone interested in how culture is created, regardless of their academic disciplines, these observations and results should be quite interesting."

Origins of innovation explored

In her study, done with scientists at Arrhus University in Denmark as well as the University of Toronto and Yale University, Bădescu notes that innovation drives cultural evolution yet little is known about its developmental origins or the role of immature individuals generating novel behaviors.

Over 15 months in 2013-2014 and 2018, Bădescu examined 67 different uses of objects by 36 infant and juvenile chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at the Ngogo field site. Nearly half of those uses were atypical, deviating from adult norms, she found.

Of those, almost all - 94 per cent - were new uses or modifications of adult forms or uses in new contexts, including three innovations: playing with a "doll" (a tree stump carried as if it were an infant), sponging up water with a tuft of moss, and clipping leaves to signal wanting to be carried.

Others used stick tools to probe for and eat honey from honeycombs, as well as to fish for and eat termites. They also used tools in social contexts, for instance 'leaf grooming' of each other, much like the adults do, but in their own way.

An 'exploration index'

To assess individual differences, Bădescu and her team developed an "exploration index" integrating frequency, diversity and atypicality of object use. Nine individual chimpanzee children had notably higher scores.

Females and offspring of mothers of several children scored higher, indicating the positive effects of sex and social support from experienced mothers and siblings.

"These findings suggest that immatures generate novelty at the margins of species-typical behaviour yet vary in their propensity to innovate," the co-authors conclude in their study.

"A permissive social environment for object play may be key to the developmental pathways of innovation, providing a generative context for behavioural variation on which social learning and selection can act," they write.

"If retained and transmitted, even rare innovations by immatures could contribute to the accumulation of cultural complexity."

New psychology study suggests chimpanzees might be rational thinkers



A new study published in Science provides evidence that chimpanzees can rationally revise their beliefs when presented with new information



University of California - Berkeley

Chimps in a field 

image: 

“This research can help us think differently about how we approach early education or how we model reasoning in AI systems,” said Emily Sanford, a researcher at UC Berkeley. “We shouldn’t assume children are blank slates when they walk into a classroom.”

view more 

Credit: Sabana Gonzalez / Social Origins Lab





Chimpanzees may have more in common with human thinkers than previously thought. A new study published in Science by researchers provides evidence that chimpanzees can rationally revise their beliefs when presented with new information.

The study, titled “Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs,” was conducted by a large research team that included UC Berkeley Psychology Postdoctoral Researcher Emily Sanford, UC Berkeley Psychology Professor Jan Engelmann and Utrecht University Psychology Professor Hanna Schleihauf. Their findings showed that chimpanzees — like humans — can change their minds based on the strength of available evidence, a key feature of rational thought.

Working at the Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Uganda, the researchers presented chimps with two boxes, one containing food. Initially, the animals received a clue suggesting which box held the reward. Later, they were given stronger evidence pointing to the other box. The chimps frequently switched their choices in response to the new clues.

“Chimpanzees were able to revise their beliefs when better evidence became available,” said Sanford, who is a researcher in the UC Berkeley Social Origins Lab. “This kind of flexible reasoning is something we often associate with 4-year-old children. It was exciting to show that chimps can do this too.”

To ensure the findings reflected genuine reasoning rather than instinct, the team incorporated tightly controlled experiments and computational modeling. These analyses ruled out simpler explanations, such as the chimps favoring the latest signal (recency bias) or reacting to the most obvious cue. The models confirmed that the chimps’ decision-making aligned with rational strategies of belief revision.

“We recorded their first choice, then their second, and compared whether they revised their beliefs,” Sanford said. “We also used computational models to test how their choices matched up with various reasoning strategies.” 

The study challenges the traditional view that rationality — the ability to form and revise beliefs based on evidence — is exclusive to humans.

“The difference between humans and chimpanzees isn’t a categorical leap. It’s more like a continuum,” Sanford said. 

Sanford also sees broader applications for this research. Understanding how primates revise beliefs could reshape how scientists think about learning, child development and even artificial intelligence.

“This research can help us think differently about how we approach early education or how we model reasoning in AI systems,” she said. “We shouldn’t assume children are blank slates when they walk into a classroom.”

The next phase of her study brings the same tasks to children. Sanford’s team is currently collecting data from two- to four-year-olds to compare how toddlers and chimps revise beliefs. 

“It’s fascinating to design a task for chimps, and then try to adapt it for a toddler,” she said.

Eventually, she hopes to extend the study to other primate species as well, building a comparative map of reasoning abilities across evolutionary branches. While Sanford has worked on everything from dog empathy to numerical cognition in children, one lesson remains constant: animals are capable of much more than we assume.

“They may not know what science is, but they’re navigating complex environments with intelligent and adaptive strategies,” she said. “And that’s something worth paying attention to.”

Other members of the research team include: Bill Thompson (UC Berkeley Psychology);  Snow Zhang (UC Berkeley Philosophy); Joshua Rukundo (Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary/Chimpanzee Trust, Uganda); Josep Call (School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews); and Esther Herrmann (School of Psychology, University of Portsmouth).

 

Study maps priority areas to reduce macaw deaths from electric shock



At least 35 individuals of the endangered Lear's macaw have been killed by electrocution in the semi-arid region of Bahia, Brazil, in 2025. Replacing 10% of the riskiest poles could prevent 80% of these deaths.




Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Study maps priority areas to reduce macaw deaths from electric shock 

image: 

A pair of Lear's macaws in one of their habitats in the semi-arid Caatinga region of Brazil. The low vegetation may be why the birds perch on power poles

view more 

Credit: Erica Pacífico/Unicamp




The Lear's macaw (Anodorhynchus leari), a species endemic to the north of the state of Bahia, Brazil, nearly went extinct in the 1990s. Thanks to conservation efforts, its population has grown to 2,500 today. However, this expansion has coincided with the rapid growth of the region's power grid, which increased by approximately 30% between 2018 and 2023. Consequently, between January and August of 2025, 35 macaws were found dead with signs of electrocution — accidental death or injury caused by electricity.

To mitigate the problem, a study supported by FAPESP identified the locations most prone to this type of accident within the municipalities where the species is present. Ninety percent of the population is in the Raso da Catarina region. The mapping took into account 78 reported electrocutions between 2005 and 2022, the region's power grid composition, and the species' area of activity, among other factors.

The study, published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, reveals that modifying 10% of the poles with the highest risk could reduce known accidents by approximately 80%.

"The main objective is to identify priority areas for mitigation, where changes can be made to the poles to prevent further deaths and potential power outages. Our estimates indicate a good cost-benefit ratio for both the supplier and the conservation of the species," says Larissa Biasotto, a Brazilian based in the UK and senior science officer at BirdLife International. She is also the first author of the study.

While pursuing her doctorate at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Biasotto obtained data on Brazil's entire national power grid from the National Electric Energy Agency (ANEEL) via the Access to Information Act. She wanted to understand which bird species and biomes were primarily affected by the power grid.

One of the first results was published in 2021. The mapping indicated the Lear's macaw as one of the priority species in terms of the risk of electrocution and the development of mitigation measures.

When Biasotto published the article, the National Center for Research and Conservation of Wild Birds (CEMAVE), which is part of the Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), linked to the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment, and researcher Erica Pacífico were observing a significant increase in the electrocution of the species in municipalities such as Canudos and Euclides da Cunha in Bahia, where Pacífico has been conducting her research since 2008. Based solely on the count of carcasses collected near power poles by residents, more than 70 birds had been killed since then.

"This is a conservative number because it doesn't account for all those that may have died in sparsely populated areas or whose carcasses were consumed by dogs or scavenger birds. It's estimated that in the Caatinga [a semi-arid biome in northeastern Brazil], an animal carcass lasts a maximum of three days," explains Pacífico. She is the coordinator of the Lear's Macaw Research and Conservation group, a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Biology at the State University of Campinas (IB-UNICAMP), and a co-author of the study.

The study is part of the project "Use of New Bio-Tracking and Analytical Tools for the Study of Movement Ecology and Bird Conservation in the Caatinga," which is supported by FAPESP and coordinated by Francisco Voeroes Dénes, a professor at the Institute of Biosciences at the University of São Paulo (IB-USP).

Fernanda Paschotto, who completed a master's degree at IB-USP on the life history and habitat selection of the Lear's macaw with a scholarship from FAPESP, is among the authors of the study.

Cost-benefit

Since 2008, Pacífico has continuously monitored the species, cataloging nests and counting the population. In 2017, the organization began using biologgers – collars that provide GPS location – to collect unprecedented information on the daily movement patterns of some Lear's macaws and to more accurately define their area of activity. This area largely consists of feeding sites where the licuri palm (Syagrus coronata) grows. The fruits of this palm tree are the macaws' main food source. Notably, areas where licuri palms grow are where most of the reported electrocutions occur.

"One of the innovations of the study is that we didn't use the species' distribution area as a whole, as is usually done in this type of mapping, but rather the area of activity, where the probability of electrocution is higher. It's in these places that they spend most of the day, feeding, interacting with each other, and perching on poles and medium-voltage wires. Because they're taller than the native vegetation, these points offer a privileged view of the territory," says Biasotto.

Animals can be electrocuted when they touch a wire carrying an electrical current at the same time as another wire that does not carry current or has a lower voltage. For this reason, the Bahia Public Prosecutor's Office proposed a solution through a Conduct Adjustment Agreement: increase the distance between the wires, which requires replacing poles, a task initiated by the company.

According to the cost-benefit analysis carried out by the researchers, mitigating the possible effects on 1% of the poles in the areas with the highest risk of electrocution could prevent 35% of accidents, requiring intervention on at least 5,668 poles.

However, since this reduction could be insufficient for the population's viability, the authors also performed calculations considering 5% of the highest-risk area (22,037 poles), which would prevent 60% of electrocutions.

Extending the modeling to 10% and 20% of the highest-risk areas would require changes to 37,412 and 63,966 poles, respectively, and would result in reductions in accidents greater than 80% and 90%, respectively.

Conservation

The Lear's macaw is currently classified as "threatened" on both the Brazilian list of endangered species and on the list of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). According to ICMBio's National Action Plan for the Conservation of Birds in the Caatinga, its population is estimated at less than 2,600 individuals. Therefore, the authors argue that reducing fatalities by 60% may not be enough to ensure the species' long-term viability.

"Until we have a population viability study for the species, a reduction closer to 90% would be more cautious, making changes to 10% to 20% of the poles," Pacífico argues.

According to Biasotto, replacing the poles would likely be costly. Another solution would be to develop devices that insulate electrical structures and provide safe landing places for birds. One approach is to insulate the wires with non-conductive plastic tubing. This solution is used in Europe to protect birds of prey, which are the main victims of electrocution there.

"However, in the locations where they were installed for testing in Bahia, the structures were damaged, probably due to weather conditions and improper installation," says the researcher.

Unlike solitary predators, macaws congregate in groups of up to 50 individuals, explore their environment extensively, and can easily destroy material with their powerful, sharp beaks. Therefore, a device suitable for the semi-arid region and its birds must be developed.

In addition to guiding future accident mitigation actions and protecting the Lear's macaw, the researchers argue that the mapping model could, in the future, include other bird species in the region. The most emblematic example is the Spix's macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii), which is extinct in the wild but is currently part of a reintroduction program. Due to its similar habits to those of the Lear's macaw, the Spix's macaw could benefit from an electrocution mitigation project as well.

In his book about the saga to save the Spix's macaw, author Tony Juniper suggests that the last individual of the species died from electrocution.

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe.

 

Global environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys significantly expand known geographic and ecological niche ranges of marine fish, highlighting current biases in conservation and ecological modeling



PLOS
Global environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys significantly expand known geographic and ecological niche ranges of marine fish, highlighting current biases in conservation and ecological modeling 

image: 

Fish sampling under the Greenlandic sea-ice.

view more 

Credit: David Grémillet and Nicolas Loiseau (CC-BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)


 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper in PLOS Biologyhttps://plos.io/42mNz7A 

Article title: eDNA surveys substantially expand known geographic and ecological niche boundaries of marine fishes

Author countries: France, Switzerland, Tanzania, Indonesia

Funding: see manuscript

 

CTE: More than just head trauma, suggests new study



Researchers use single-cell genome sequencing to show DNA damage similar to Alzheimer’s disease in the brains of patients with CTE





Boston Children's Hospital





Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) – most often found in athletes playing contact sports – is known to share similarities with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), namely the buildup of a protein called tau in the brain. New research published today in Science finds even more commonalities between the two at the genetic level, showing CTE (like AD) is linked to damage to the genome and not just caused by repeated head impact (RHI).

The research team, a collaboration between Boston Children’s Hospital, Mass General Brigham, and Boston University, used single-cell genomic sequencing to identify somatic genetic mutations (changes in DNA that occurs after conception and are not hereditary).  They analyzed hundreds of neurons from the prefrontal cortex of 15 individuals diagnosed with CTE postmortem and 4 individuals with RHI but without CTE and compared their findings with 19 neurotypical controls and 7 individuals with AD.

The team found neurons from brain samples with CTE had specific abnormal patterns of somatic genome damage that closely resemble those seen in AD. Notably, brain samples that displayed signs of RHI without CTE didn’t have these changes. They also observed that those with CTE showed signs of damage equivalent to 100+ years of excess aging.

“Our results suggest that CTE develops through some process in addition to head trauma,” said Chris Walsh, MD, PhD, Chief of the Division of Genetics and Genomics and Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Boston Children’s and co-corresponding author of the study. “We suspect it involves immune activation in a way similar to Alzheimer’s disease, happening years after trauma.”

RHI most often occurs during contact sports such as American football, hockey, or rugby or during military service. CTE has been found postmortem in the brains of teenagers and young adults playing amateur sports, as well as in older professional athletes. Recent research from co-corresponding author Ann McKee, MD, William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor of Neurology and Pathology at Boston University and director of BU’s CTE Center, found RHI causes brain damage in young people even before CTE. Their study, published last month in Nature, suggested that RHI-related brain injury occurs before the onset of tau deposition as CTE. This new research published today adds on to this growing evidence base.

“One of the most significant aspects of our work is the introduction of a new, single-cell genome approach to CTE,” said co-corresponding author Michael Miller, MD, PhD, a neuropathologist and principal investigator in the Mass General Brigham Department of Pathology. “Our study provides further evidence that CTE is a bona fide neurodegenerative disease defined by its unique neuropathological features.”

Given the shared mechanisms found between CTE and AD, there could be promise in identifying shared novel targets for these two neurodegenerative diseases.