Showing posts sorted by date for query FOXES. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query FOXES. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

 

‘Putting biodiversity in our hands’: British wildlife will soon be celebrated on banknotes

A vote is currently being held to determine which animals to feature on the new banknotes.
Copyright Canva

By Angela Symons
Published on

Some say 'animal underdogs' have been left off the shortlist, which is now open to a public vote.

Historical figures like Winston Churchill will soon be replaced by native wildlife on UK banknotes.

In a public consultation run by the Bank of England, the theme of nature came out on top. The exact plants and animals that will be on the notes will be chosen later this year.

Nature is more than just scenery, it is the living thread that binds our landscapes, our history, and our future together,” says Scottish wildlife filmmaker Gordon Buchanan, who is part of an expert panel that has compiled the list, which is currently open to votes from the public. “To protect nature is to protect the quiet, resilient heartbeat of the land itself.”

Not only could the new notes inspire wildlife conservation, they’re also well positioned to protect the economy.

“The key driver for introducing a new banknote series is always to increase counterfeit resilience,” says Victoria Cleland, chief cashier at the Bank of England.

“Nature is a great choice from a banknote authentication perspective,” she adds, because it lends itself to developing security features that are easy for the public to recognise and distinguish.

A public vote will determine which animals and plants will be on the new banknotes.
A public vote will determine which animals and plants will be on the new banknotes. Canva

Symbolic recognition of UK wildlife ‘overdue and significant’

Nature was the most popular theme among 44,000 respondents in the July 2025 consultation, capturing 60 per cent of the vote.

It will replace the current historical figures featured on the reverse side of banknotes, which include writer Jane Austen, artist JMW Turner and scientist Alan Turing, as well as the WWII Prime Minister.

“This is a powerful reminder of how deeply people feel connected to and value British wildlife,” says Ali Fisher, founder and director of sustainability consultancy Plans with Purpose. “It’s a beautiful opportunity to put biodiversity literally in all our hands.”

Architecture and Landmarks was the second most popular at 56 per cent, followed by Notable Historical Figures (38 per cent), Arts, Culture and Sport (30 per cent), Innovation (23 per cent) and Noteworthy Milestones (19 per cent).

“The wildlife of the UK is not separate from our culture. It sits in our football crests, our folklore, our coastlines and our childhoods,” says wildlife presenter and activist Nadeem Perera, another panel member. “Giving it space on something as symbolic as our currency feels both overdue and significant.”

Which animals could feature on the new banknotes?

The RSPA has called for Britain's "least-loved" wildlife – such as pigeons, gulls and foxes – to feature on the new banknotes. The charity said this could help change perceptions of "misunderstood" animals and encourage people to see the value of all wildlife.

“What about the pigeons who have been our friends for thousands of years, or rats, with their amazing memories, or even gulls, with their amazing levels of intelligence?," says Geoff Edmond, wildlife expert at the RSPCA. "They are all fascinating wild animals in their own right – and deserve recognition too.”

While pigeons and rats didn't make the final cut, the red fox is an option alongside the pine marten, grey seal, European hedgehog, brown hare and bottlenose dolphin.

In the birds category, voters can choose between the Atlantic puffin, barn owl, common kingfisher, Eurasian curlew, great spotted woodpecker and white-tailed eagle. While the amphibians, insects and fish line up includes the Atlantic salmon, basking shark, buff-tailed bumblebee, common frog, emperor dragonfly and marsh fritillary butterfly.

"It's great that the Bank of England has pulled together a diverse shortlist... although we would love to see more animal underdogs make the cut," said Dr Ros Clubb, Head of Wild Animals at the RSPCA, following the announcement.

Norway’s krone series features images of the sea.
Norway’s krone series features images of the sea. Canva

From Norway to Switzerland: Which other European countries champion nature on their notes?

The Bank of England won’t be the first in Europe to give nature a place on its banknotes. Scottish notes already include animals such as mackerel, otters and red squirrels.

Norway’s latest krone series celebrates its long coastline by featuring wave motifs and Atlantic cod and herring.

Switzerland began shifting away from featuring famous personalities on its banknotes in 2016, with wind, water and light among the stars of its ‘many facets of Switzerland’ series. Butterflies, the Alps and dandelion seeds now grace its currency, with a new series set to double-down on native plants and Alpine landscapes in the 2030s.

Nature could also replace architecture on future euro banknotes, with the European Central Bank considering designs featuring birds and rivers across Europe.

Following a contest for EU designers to submit proposals in 2025, the shortlisted themes are ‘Rivers and birds: resilience in diversity’ and ‘European culture: shared cultural spaces’. A final decision is expected to be made in 2026.

“In a cost‑of‑living, climate and nature crisis, small cultural shifts like this matter,” says Fisher. “They help normalise the idea that our natural world is worth celebrating, protecting and investing in.”

Sunday, June 07, 2026

Republicans Want Cyanide Bombs on Public Lands


 June 5, 2026

Image by Brittani Burns.

Trump’s bombing of Iran, Venezuela, Iraq, Nigeria, Yemen, Caribbean boats, and Somalia (Council on Foreign Relations info) has torn to shreds his “political brand” opposing foreign military adventures, promising “no wars” in campaign speech after campaign speech after campaign speech.

Now, his administration is taking “bombing” one step further into the wilderness, over hill, over dale, through bush, through briar (Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream) right here on U.S. soil. Cyanide bombs are back in style after being banned by the Biden administration.

“The Bureau of Land Management last month quietly lifted its total ban on the use of so-called cyanide bombs on public land and said deployment of the spring-loaded devices used to kill coyotes and other predators will now be considered on a “case-by-case” basis.” (BLM, USDA Agree to Renew Use of ‘Cyanide Bombs’, E&E News by Politico, May 8, 2026)

Cyanide bombs or “M-44s have been and are used on certain state and private lands in Texas, New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Nevada, and West Virginia. In Colorado, M-44s are used only on private land. Oregon, Washington, and California have banned M-44s everywhere, including on BLM lands within their borders.” (Trump Administration Resurrects Archaic Poison Bombs No One Wants, Animal Wellness Action, May 22, 2026)

Cyanide bombs are designed to kill coyotes, red foxes, gray foxes, and feral dogs that prey on sheep, poultry and newborn cattle.

“But coyotes, foxes and feral dogs are not all that M-44s kill. According to Wildlife Services’ own records, they also kill at least 150 nontarget species including cattle, sheep, goats, guard dogs, bird dogs, pet dogs, grizzly bears, black bears, endangered Mexican wolves, northwestern gray wolves, bald eagles, golden eagles, falcons, other hawks, vultures, including endangered California condors, owls, ravens, crows, raccoons, opossums, skunks, sundry species of rabbits and kangaroo rats, badgers, threatened wolverines, threatened lynx, fishers and, in at least one case, humans — Dennis Slaugh of Vernal, Utah,” Ibid.

And what of campers, hikers, and dune buggies that fill public lands every day? Are they exposed and what safeguards prevent children from playing with every strange device they come across? According to Predator Defense.org, since 1990 the organization has worked with victims of M-44s, which, when set in the wild, are loaded with scented bait to attract animals.

According to Friends of Animals, M-44s are one of the most vicious devices known to randomly kill anything that breathes, for example, a tragic 2017 incident involved a 14-year-old boy named Canyon Mansfield walking his dog, Kasey, just 350 feet away from his family’s home, near Pocatello, Idaho. Canyon recognized what he thought was a sprinkler’s head sticking out of the ground but as the M-44 triggered, it sent a plume of cyanide powder five feet into the air. He was hospitalized for treatment, fortunately, brisk winds swept the poison away from him or he would have died. Kasey was not so lucky.

According to Friends of Animals countless numbers of dogs have been killed by M-44s. This heartless device defines outrageous inhumane activity to a tee, placing scented bait in the wild to kill anything that breathes that happens to pass by and boom! Dead on the spot! Do people honestly think this is a proper humane decent thing to do?

Meanwhile, the EPA claims at least 50% of all animals killed are non-targeted animals.

Unfortunately, it’s impossible to identify individual names of people who initiated or those responsible for handling M-44s in the wild as everything is buried deep within the bureaucratic mumble jumble of governmental agencies, for example, the USDA Wildlife Services within the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service that reports to the Department of Interior appears to be the primary source often working in concert with private ranchers to “manage predators.” But state agriculture departments are in charge of all operations in some of the states.

Maybe Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum has the answers.

Regardless of who is in charge, the concept of placing baited killing scented devices in the wild to kill anything that breathes, that happens to wander through the area, is so far out of touch with the sanctity of life that it’s difficult to image how it’s possible to find people willing to administer such an idiotic scheme. Who are these people willing to take innocent lives as if life itself is meaningless?

In May 2026, Republicans included language in the Fiscal Year 2027 USDA appropriations bill instructing federal agencies to “fully integrate” the poison devices back into routine use.

There are many alternatives to M-44. According to the Center for Biological Diversity: “Numerous effective, alternative tools to address livestock conflicts exist, eliminating the need for M-44s altogether. For example, guard animals can be deployed, herders and range riders can be employed, and livestock operators can change animal husbandry practices to lessen the risk of predation. Deterrents, such as sound- and light-emitting frightening devices, can also be used to scare away potential predators.”

But of course, when comparing the bombing of countries like Iran, where civilians are randomly killed when in the line of fire, or soft, easy targets like small, totally unidentified boats in the seas, it makes it much easier to accept and boast of cyanide bombing of defenseless animals in the wild. Indeed, these are signals of a weak personal constitution, spinelessness and lack of imagination, as easy pickings bring shame, not praise.

According to Coyote Project.org, “The toll of M-44s on wildlife has been staggering. Between 2014 and 2022, these devices intentionally killed over 88,000 animals—and these are only the known deaths.” There are anecdotal stories claiming millions killed, whether intentional or unintentional, M-44 does not discriminate; if it is breathing, it’s dead.

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.

Friday, June 05, 2026

 Trump’s ANWR Oil and Gas Auction Was a Bust—But Alaskan Arctic Still Faces Fossil Fuel Threat


“Even though the interest in today’s sale was tepid, the new leasing still poses significant threats to habitat, iconic wildlife, and Indigenous ways of life,” said Earthjustice.



Polar bears feed on whale carcasses in Kaktovik, Alaska on July 1, 2024.
(Photo by Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

In an embarrassment for President Donald Trump and his “drill, baby, drill” energy policy, Friday’s third oil and gas lease sale in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge once again drew no bids from Big Oil—but conservationists stressed that fossil fuel expansion still poses a serious threat to the pristine wilderness and its human and animal inhabitants.

The US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) offered 60 tracts on 689,000 acres in the ANWR in northeastern Alaska’s Coastal Plain for lease sales. Just two companies—the government-owned Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority and Hex LLC, an Alaska firm—bought five leases that generated a paltry $3.7 million in total receipts.



“Yet again, no major oil and gas companies showed up to bid, because they know that drilling in the Arctic Refuge is a losing proposition,” said Kristen Moreland, executive director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee, which represents the Gwich’in Indigenous people and opposes drilling.

“We will continue to fight the Trump administration’s leasing program, and work with our friends and allies to protect this sacred and irreplaceable landscape from development of any kind,” Moreland added.

The Trump administration had touted fossil fuel lease sales as a way to help pay for tax cuts in the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act that mostly benefited corporations and wealthy individuals. The law, which was signed last July by Trump and extends tax cuts the president enacted in 2017, is expected to result in over $5 trillion in lost revenue through 2034, according to an analysis by the Tax Foundation, the world’s leading independent tax policy nonprofit.

Despite the underwhelming result, the BLM described Friday’s ANWR lease sale as “successful,” with agency Director Steve Pearce calling it “another important step toward restoring American Energy Dominance and responsibly developing the vast resources Congress directed us to make available in the Coastal Plain.”

Friday’s lease sale was the third such auction, the first of which was held in 2021 during Trump’s first term and generated just 1% of the administration’s projected revenue. The Biden administration—which canceled the leases issued in the 2021 sale—held another lease auction last year because Trump’s 2017 tax cut law required two ANWR lease sales within seven years. The 2025 auction drew no bidders.

Green groups and other drilling opponents warned that Friday’s flop does not diminish the threat posed by fossil fuel development in ANWR, which is home to the North Slope Iñupiat and the Gwich’in peoples and 270 animal species, including all of the world’s remaining South Beaufort Sea polar bears and the 200,000 porcupine caribou upon which the Gwich’in—who call the area the “sacred place where life begins—rely upon for their survival. The North Slope Iñupiat broadly support drilling and called Friday’s lease sale ”an important milestone.“




“Even though the interest in today’s sale was tepid, the new leasing still poses significant threats to habitat, iconic wildlife, and Indigenous ways of life in one of the nation’s most wild and beautiful landscapes,” Earthjustice—one of the groups leading a lawsuit challenging the lease sales—said in a statement. “All of today’s leases are in important polar bear habitat, for example.”

Athan Manuel, the Sierra Club’s director of lands protection, said that “today’s lease sale was another embarrassment and broken promise. The Trump administration has pushed leasing out the Arctic Refuge as the way to finance huge tax cuts, yet today generated $3.7 million for the federal government.”

“Let’s call that what it is, another scam to trick Americans into giving away our precious natural world,” Manuel continued. “It does nothing to change the reality that drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge remains a risky, controversial, and fundamentally flawed proposition.”

“For years, the public was promised that sacrificing the refuge would generate significant economic benefits,” Manuel added. “Instead, this leasing program has been plagued by uncertainty while putting one of America’s most important public lands at risk.”

Autumn Hanna, vice president of the advocacy group Taxpayers for Common Sense, said, “From two previous failed lease sales that delivered less than 1% of promised revenue, taxpayers already know that drilling in the Arctic Refuge is a bad deal.”

“Today’s lease sale is yet another reminder that oil and gas development in the refuge is high-risk, low-reward, with zero interest from real industry players,” Hanna added. “Americans will not see relief at the pump and, instead, face greater risks from the drilling in a sensitive region.”


Trump Auction Opens Arctic Refuge Drilling Rights for First Time Ever

The Trump Administration is holding its latest lease sale in Alaska on Friday in a test for investors and environmentalists as the auction comprises tracts in the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is holding the oil and gas lease sale today, after last year the Trump Administration removed legislative protections from the Biden presidency that restricted oil and gas exploration in Alaska, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and federal lands in the state.

The first sale for the Coastal Plain, "a milestone in unleashing Alaska's vast energy potential," as BLM said in April announcing the date of the lease sale, follows a record-breaking lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska in March.

The first lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska in seven years became the most successful auction in the area ever, as oil majors bid on hundreds of tracts, signaling they haven't given up on Alaska's petroleum resources despite development and court challenges.

The lease sale for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska in March, one of five mandated in the next decade under the Trump Administration's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), drew a record high of $163.7 million in high bids and resulted in 187 leases in total, awarded to companies including ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and a consortium of Repsol and Shell subsidiaries.

The lease sale set a record for Alaska with the most revenue generated ever, the most tracts receiving bids, and the second most acreage sold in a single sale, the Bureau of Land Management said at the time.

Now the Administration is looking to open the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, saying that it has "strong potential for oil and gas development."

The area may contain between 4.25 and 11.8 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, BLM says.

Going forward, the development of any additional resources in Alaska would not be a fast and easy task. The conditions are harsher than in other areas, while environmentalists have vowed to fight both the lease sales and any future oil and gas drilling and development plans.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com


‘Hands Off the Arctic,’ Say Wilderness Defenders as Trump Holds Alaska Oil and Gas Lease Sale

“Some places are too important to sacrifice,” said one Indigenous leader as the Trump administration invited fossil fuel companies to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.



Caribou migrate in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northern Alaska on June 29, 2024.
(Photo by Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images)


Brett Wilkins
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The Trump administration is set Friday to sell oil and gas drilling leases on 689,000 acres in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a pristine and protected area in northeastern Alaska’s coastal plain known for its massive biodiversity and held sacred by its Indigenous inhabitants.

The US Department of the Interior’s (DOI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is offering 60 tracts in the ANWR to fossil fuel companies that submitted bids by Wednesday. The lease sale is the first of four in the ANWR mandated under the One Big Beautiful Bill signed by President Donald Trump last year and follows two previous sales this decade, one of which saw little interest during Trump’s first term and another that generated no bids during the tenure of former President Joe Biden.




The sale is part of Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” fossil fuel agenda and follows last October’s reopening by the DOI of 1.56 million acres of the Coastal Plain to oil and gas leasing. The move reversed the Biden administration’s 2023 cancellation of all existing oil and gas leases in the ANWR and ban on drilling across 13 million acres of the adjacent National Petroleum Reserve.

The Trump administration also recently transferred approximately 1.4 million acres of public lands along the Dalton Utility Corridor from the BLM to the state of Alaska, a move one conservationist warned “will only help corporate polluters transform Alaska into an industrial wasteland... for the sake of expanding the portfolios of mining and oil and gas companies.”

The ANWR is home to Indigenous peoples, primarily the North Slope Iñupiat and the Gwich’in. The former are generally supportive of fossil fuel development, arguing that it provides jobs and revenue and boosts self-determination, while the latter broadly opposes drilling.

The Gwich’in call the area “the sacred place where life begins” and rely upon its rich biodiversity—especially its 200,000-strong porcupine caribou herd—for their survival. ANWR boasts some 270 animal species, including musk oxen, Arctic foxes, snow geese and other migratory birds, and all of the world’s remaining South Beaufort Sea polar bears.

While the American Petroleum Institute, the nation’s leading fossil fuel lobby, welcomed Friday’s lease sale, calling Alaska’s oil and gas “key to America’s energy security,” Kristen Moreland, executive director of the Gwich’in Steering Committee, countered that “some places are too important to sacrifice.”

In a Thursday call with reporters, Moreland said that “tomorrow’s lease sale is about much more than economics or development. It is about whether our voices, our culture, and our way of life matters.”

Conservationists also denounced the lease sale, which Earthjustice—part of a coalition challenging the DOI’s policy in federal court—called “another effort to sell out our public lands to boost corporate profits, while Indigenous communities, wildlife, and future generations carry the risk.”

US Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said Friday on X that “America’s public lands—including the incredible Arctic National Wildlife Refuge—belong to all of us. But now the Trump-Vance administration is auctioning it off to their Big Oil cronies that already have plenty of other areas to drill.”

In a video posted Thursday on social media, US Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) called ANWR “the crown jewel of our American National Wildlife Refuge system.”

“Tomorrow, the Trump administration is gonna try to lease the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil drilling. So I’ve got a message for all the oil majors out there,” the senator said. “I understand you have a job to do. That job never involves drilling in American national parks or national wildlife refuges. Don’t bid.”

Congresswoman Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) also posted a video addressing the lease sale and arguing that Big Oil—part of an industry that spent nearly $450 million during the 2024 election cycle on campaign donations, lobbying, and other efforts to elect Trump and down-ballot Republicans—is “calling the shots.”




The Alaska Wilderness League said on X that “no matter how the administration and oil industry spin today’s lease sale, the outcome doesn’t change: weak demand, shrinking interest, and a story that keeps collapsing under its own promises.”

“The Arctic is not for sale, never has been, never will be,” the group added. “Hands off the Arctic.”