Showing posts sorted by date for query SARAH JAMA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SARAH JAMA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, December 01, 2025

 

Home hospital care demonstrates success in rural communities


Among acutely ill patients who traditionally would be cared for in a brick-and-mortar hospital, patients transferred quickly and treated at home had 27% lower cost, increased physical activity, and high satisfaction



Mass General Brigham





One in five people in the United States live in a rural area. Patients in rural communities often struggle to access care because of travel difficulties, high costs and limited resources, leading to worse medical outcomes. With over 150 rural hospital closures since 2010, innovative approaches to care delivery in rural areas are needed. In a new study by investigators from Mass General Brigham and Ariadne Labs, in collaboration with colleagues at rural U.S. and Canadian health centers, researchers found that hospital-level care at home is feasible for patients living in rural areas with acute conditions who traditionally would have been cared for in a brick-and-mortar hospital, and substantially improved experiences of care and physical activity levels. Findings are published in JAMA Network Open.

“Rural health care is in a crisis, and we need to think differently. Hospital-level care delivered in patients’ homes has improved healthcare delivery in urban settings but may fill an even greater need in rural areas, where longer transit times, poor accessibility, and hospital closures challenge access to high quality care,” said David Levine, MD, MPH, MA, Clinical Director of Research & Development at Mass General Brigham Healthcare at Home and Director of Ariadne Labs’ Home Hospital Program. “We’ve shown that home hospital care not only works in rural settings, but that patients also prefer their care at home.”

This randomized controlled trial included 161 adults who required inpatient care for acute conditions (primarily infections, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma). Participants were recruited after presenting for emergency care at Blessing Hospital (IL), Hazard Appalachian Regional Healthcare Regional Medical Center (KY), and Wetaskiwin Hospital and Care Centre (Canada). They were assigned to either traditional “brick-and-mortar” hospital care for the length of their treatment, or home hospital care, which was administered via twice daily in-home visits with nurses and paramedics and a daily remote visit with a physician or advanced practice provider.

Innovative technologies minimized the need for medical equipment to be brought into patients’ homes. A wireless sticker on the patient's chest took the place of a typical hospital telemetry system for continuous monitoring. Intravenous infusions could be delivered from an ambulatory infusion pump small enough to fit in a fanny pack. A handheld meter could check a patient’s labs right in the home.

Overall, there was no significant difference in cost for the two groups. Notably, when the researchers compared the control group to the home hospital patients who had been transferred home after less than 3 days of brick-and-mortar care, they found that the cost was 27% lower, emphasizing the importance of early transfers. Readmission rates were similar 30 days after treatment, and no major safety differences emerged between groups. Home patients were less sedentary, taking an average of 700 more steps per day than controls. They also reported substantially greater satisfaction—almost double that of their counterparts who received care at the hospital (a net promoter score of 88.4 vs. 45.5, with 100 indicating maximum satisfaction).

The researchers are continuing to analyze how home hospital impacts movement, qualitative experiences, and caregiver experiences. They are also working to develop a mobile clinic, housed in an electric vehicle, with the necessary technology to deliver hospital-level care to any rural area in the U.S.

“Hopefully this work can spur patients, clinicians, and healthcare leaders in rural areas to recommend, request, and build home hospital programs,” Levine said. “Those particular areas that may have lost their hospital may be able to establish home hospital programs that are less expensive than brick-and-mortar care and employ clinicians that work locally. We hope others can use this research to take action in their communities because we have seen that when patients desire certain models of care, those models come to fruition. We feel this may be one innovation to help solve the rural healthcare crisis.”

Authorship: In addition to Levine, Mass General Brigham and Ariadne authors include Patricia C. Dykes, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Meghna P. Desai, Sarah M. Findeisen, Stephanie C. Blitzer, and Ryan C. L. Brewster. Additional authors include, Michelle N. Grinman, Steven C. Amrhein, Mitchell Wicker, Scott M. Harrison, and Mary Frances Barthel.

Disclosures: Levine reported receiving royalties from Biofourmis and is an advisor to Feminai outside the submitted work. Grinman reported receiving in-kind research support to the institution from the Brigham and Women's Hospital Ariadne Labs during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.


Funding: This study was funded with the support of The Thompson Family Foundation.

 

Paper cited: Levine DM et al. “Hospital-Level Care at Home for Adults Living in Rural Settings” JAMA Network Open DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45712

###

About Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.

About Ariadne Labs

Ariadne Labs, a joint center for health systems innovation at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, is dedicated to saving lives and reducing suffering by addressing critical gaps in health care systems. Through implementation science and human-centered design, we develop scalable solutions in four key areas: maternal and child health, patient safety, integrated care models, and health care at home. Our work enhances outcomes, alleviates suffering, and promotes dignity in care delivery. Accessed in over 185 countries and impacting more than half a billion lives, we strive to ensure health systems deliver high-quality, equitable care for everyone, everywhere. Learn more at ariadnelabs.org.

Wednesday, November 05, 2025


Parent-teen sexual health communication and teens’ health information and service seeking



JAMA Network Open

 


About The Study: 

In a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of 522 parent-teen dyads, frequent parent-teen sexual health communication was associated with increased teen self-efficacy for sexual and reproductive health information and service seeking, but this depended on how comfortable and informed their parents felt. These findings suggest that parents must possess accurate information and comfort to discuss sexual health topics. 


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Hannah Javidi, PhD, email hjavidi@ncat.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.41712)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.41712?guestAccessKey=1b34668e-afe8-4888-aa3d-dd05b3b83eff&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=110525

About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication. 

Menstrual health education and programs must reach all young adolescents




Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health






November 5, 2025-- Menstrual health remains critically underprioritized in global research and programming, according to a new Lancet Child & Adolescent Health paper, “Attention to Menarche, Puberty Education, and Menstrual Health Monitoring Are Essential.”

The lead authors at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and Emory University Rollins School of Public Health identify two key opportunities to advance menstrual health for young adolescents: expanding attention to the experience of menarche through early puberty education,  and strengthening national and regional monitoring of menstrual health.

“Menarche is a pivotal milestone with lasting implications for health and social outcomes, yet it receives far too little attention in health research and programming,” said Marni Sommer, DrPH, MSN, RN, professor of Sociomedical Sciences at Columbia Mailman School and senior author. She also leads the Gender, Adolescent Transitions and Environment (GATE) Program at Columbia.

Sommer and colleagues note that conversations about menstruation and pregnancy risk rarely occur, leaving many adolescents unprepared and reinforcing fear, shame, and misinformation.

Co-authors are Bethany A Caruso, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Garazi Zulaika, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK; Julie Hennegan, University of Queensland, Brisbane and Burnet Institute, Melbourne; Mobolaji Ibitoye, School of Public Health, Rutgers University; Sarah C. Blake, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health; and Belen Torondel, London School of Hygiene &

Tropical Medicine.

 

Authors receive funding from Gates Foundation, Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). 

 
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the third largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu.

 

Friday, October 31, 2025

 

As Medicaid work requirements loom, U-M study finds links between coverage, better health and higher employment



Biggest job gains seen among low-income adults with serious health problems whose health improved over time




Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan





Recent federal legislation requires the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to start implementing work requirements in their Medicaid programs by January 2027.

But a new University of Michigan study suggests that those requirements may work against their intended purpose.

The requirements mean people with low incomes will need to prove they’re working, or have a specific reason not to work, in order to keep their Medicaid health coverage. If they do not meet deadlines or submit the right information, they could lose their coverage for health care.

But the new study shows that Medicaid coverage itself is associated with employment gains among those least likely to have jobs: people with both low incomes and burdensome health problems.

It also shows that health improvements among Medicaid enrollees are strongly associated with employment gains.

Employment nearly doubled among Medicaid enrollees who started out with substantial health problems but saw their health improve. By the end of the study period, 47% held full- or part-time jobs, up from 26% at the start.

Among those with moderate or substantial health burden, 38% of enrollees who were unemployed in 2016, but later reported improved health, had jobs by 2018. That’s compared with just 14% of those whose health remained unchanged or worsened in that time.

The study also shows employment gains among Medicaid enrollees with medium and low levels of total health burdens. However, most people in these groups started out employed or self-employed, either full- or part-time.

The findings, published in JAMA Health Forum, come from a team at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation that has evaluated Michigan’s Medicaid expansion for over a decade.

“These findings show that Medicaid expansion doesn't discourage work—it helps make it possible,” said Minal Patel, Ph.D., lead author of the study, member of the IHPI evaluation team and professor in the U-M School of Public Health. "By improving health, Medicaid allows people to participate more fully in the workforce."

 

Medicaid expansion and work-related changes

The mandate for work requirements in states that have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act was signed into law this summer as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that nearly 5 million Americans may lose Medicaid coverage, even if they still qualify for it, between 2027 and 2034.

IHPI’s evaluation of Michigan’s Medicaid expansion, called the Healthy Michigan Plan, was required by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services and conducted under a contract from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.

Patel worked with senior author and U-M Medical School professor Susan Goold, M.D., MHSA, and the rest of the IHPI evaluation team to analyze survey data and records from more than 4,000 HMP enrollees.

HMP currently covers 716,000 Michiganders with incomes up to 133% of poverty level.

That was an annual income of about $16,500 for an individual during the study period, or about $8 an hour at 40 hours a week.

All the study participants had coverage under the Healthy Michigan Plan when they participated in a survey in 2016 that included questions about their health and employment. Most were surveyed again in 2017 and 2018, though some had left Medicaid by that time.

The study was done before a Michigan-specific work requirement briefly took effect in early 2020 and was ended by a federal court decision, before any individuals lost coverage.

Health status and employment status: Baseline and change

At the outset, 18% of enrollees had a substantial health burden. Health burden is a measure the IHPI team developed to integrate multiple measures of health status, including the number of days in the past month when someone said their physical or mental health wasn’t good or kept them from engaging in usual activities. 

Another 13% had a moderate health burden, and 69% had minimal health burden. In the full cohort of Healthy Michigan Plan enrollees, 57% had at least one chronic condition, including diabetes, heart disease, stroke, any form of arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, high blood pressure or cancer.

Half of the enrollees with substantial or moderate health burden who took follow-up surveys said their health had improved over time. Most of those with minimal health burden said their health stayed about the same.

At the start in 2016, 48% of the surveyed enrollees were employed or self-employed. But enrollees with substantial health burdens had much lower levels of employment at the start – and had the biggest jumps in employment over time, from 26% to 47%.

Those who said their health got better had the biggest employment gains.

Among enrollees who started with moderate health burden and saw improved health, 48% were employed at the start but 67% had jobs by the end.

Those with minimal health burden whose health stayed the same also saw employment rise, from 59% to 71%.

In addition to Patel and Goold, the study’s authors are Sarah Clark, M.P.H.; Erin Beathard, M.P.H.; Matthias Kirch, M.S.; Nicolas Box, M.P.A.; Renuka Tipirneni, M.D., M.Sc., and IHPI director John Z. Ayanian, M.D., M.P.P.

Data collection for the study was funded by MDHHS and CMS for the purposes of the evaluation, but the study does not represent the official views of either agency. 

Employment and Health Burden Changes Among Medicaid Expansion Enrollees, JAMA Health Forum. DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.4639