Thursday, May 22, 2025

 

Future risk of wildfire and smoke in the South



USDA Forest Service ‑ Southern Research Station
Prescribed fire in the Ouachita National Forest, Arkansas 

image: 

According to the report, prescribed fire will continue to be an effective tool for reducing wildfire and smoke risks in many areas, but safe prescribed burn windows may shorten.   

view more 

Credit: Virginia McDaniel, USDA Forest Service




Wildfire risks will continue to evolve as both society and forests change across the southeastern United States, according to a new report.

The report is one part of the Southern Forest Outlook, a project undertaken by the USDA Forest Service in partnership with the Southern Group of State Foresters to help forest managers and the public understand changing forest conditions in the South over the coming decades.

USDA Forest Service researcher Lars Pomara and his team first modeled and mapped current wildfire risks across the South, including risks to people from direct fire exposure and from indirect exposure to unhealthy smoke produced by wildfires. They also mapped risks posed by the most intense wildfires to carbon stored in forests, and to forest watersheds that supply drinking water to local communities.

The team then projected how these risks may change by the middle of this century, under a variety of scenarios representing plausible future societal, climatic and forest conditions. The modeled outcomes showed a lot of variation in risk changes across the region and among different future scenarios. Even the milder scenarios suggested that forests will be more prone to hazardous fire in many sub-regions such as the Southeastern Coastal Plain.

The Southeast continues to experience rapid population growth and development, including in rural and forested areas where neighborhoods may be near fire-prone forests—at the wildland-urban interface. As development interfaces with increasing fuel buildup resulting from fire suppression and changes in the frequency of fire-promoting weather, people are likely to become more exposed to dangerous fires and smoke.

The best tool we have for combatting fire is fire. Fire provides a myriad of benefits for forests, and many ecosystems require fire to function normally. Though high-intensity wildfires pose major risks to people, infrastructure and natural resources, prescribed fires, which are carefully planned and controlled burns carried out by trained professionals, allow us to balance these benefits and risks.

Prescribed fires burn at a low intensity to reduce available fuels and promote healthy forest growth. Reduced fuels and a more open forest translate to reduced likelihood of dangerous, intense wildfire in the future. Even where prescribed fire is impractical, mechanical methods for reducing fuels can help to manage wildfire risk.

“Forest management will be challenged in coming decades to confront the threats posed by wildfire while sustaining the positive roles of fire in southern forests,” says Pomara. “Anyone who is working in the Southeast in conservation or forest management needs to be able to prioritize work and point their resources at the places where they see opportunities to get the most efficient and effective work done, including wildfire risk management.”

To help meet this need, the research team also modeled and mapped the potential risk reductions that could be achieved with prescribed fire or other fuel reduction methods such as mechanical fuel treatments and fire-smart community planning. They found that in many landscapes, a sustained fuel management program might reduce wildfire risk enough to mostly offset expected future increases.

This report can help forest managers and planners determine where resources are best spent to support risk management approaches for a maximum return on investment to reduce risk to communities, watersheds and forest carbon.

Other findings of the report include:

  • Throughout the Southeast, forest conditions may become more like those in the western and southern parts of the South by mid-century, with a warmer climate where wildfire is more frequent. This could reduce the window of time each year when forest managers can safely implement prescribed fire, at least within traditional burn seasons.
  • The southern Appalachian Mountains, Ozark Mountains, and isolated areas along the coastal plain also consistently showed an increase in risk of smoke emissions affecting populated areas, forest carbon loss, and potential impacts to important watersheds.
  • Projected risks to people and structures were concentrated in areas dominated by wildland-urban interface. Understanding changes in socioeconomic factors that affect vulnerability to wildfire such as wealth, mobility, housing, and household composition will be important for anticipating and managing risks into the future.

The Southern Forest Outlook team also worked with the Southern Group of State Foresters to produce a companion story map website that provides public access to map viewers, an overview of the assessment, and links to community risk management resources.

The fire report is the third of five in the Southern Forest Outlook. Reports focused on markets and water were published in 2024, and additional reports on forest change and a synthesis of overall findings are forthcoming.

 

On-site health clinics boost attendance in rural classrooms




Cornell University




New York schools that host comprehensive health clinics, according to Cornell University research that is the first to confirm such benefits in rural areas. The work is also informing a legislative proposal to expand access to these clinics.

Analyzing more than 66,000 students in a four-county region over four years, the researchers found that children on average were 15% less likely to be at risk of chronic absenteeism in districts with school-based health centers (SBHCs) that can treat them onsite, run by a nonprofit hospital system, compared to those in districts without clinics.

The impact was strongest among elementary students, who are more likely to miss school if an adult must keep them home or remove them to see a doctor. Accessing quality health care is often more challenging in rural areas, the researchers said, where distances to health care may be longer, public transit is more limited and health care professionals are scarcer.

“These students tend to miss fewer classes and fewer days of school when there’s a clinic in the building,” said John Sipple, professor of global development. “Rather than the school nurse calling a parent to pick up their child, the child can be treated right in the school and often can go back to class.”

Sipple led the data analysis reported in “School-Based Health Centers and School Attendance in Rural Areas,” published in JAMA Network Open.

The research is part of a larger initiative investigating health disparities among rural youth via a $3 million National Institutes of Health grant.

School-based health centers have primarily been studied in urban areas. Sipple said the four adjacent counties studied – Chenango, Delaware, Otsego and Schoharie – provided a natural experimental sample of very similar districts except for school-based clinic access. All 52 schools spanning 32 districts were relatively small, with mostly white and lower-income student populations; but 18 schools (in 14 districts) housed Bassett clinics providing physical, mental and dental health services. The study data tracked more than 30,000 students in schools with clinics and 36,000 in schools without them, from 2015-2019.

In previously published research investigating the same region, the team found that students enrolled in schools with clinics also received more medical care, including more preventative treatment for asthma, and relied less on emergency room visits. Recognizing the clinics’ benefits to rural families, the Brooks School’s State Policy Advocacy Clinic has helped draft legislation proposing to expand their access to the younger siblings of enrolled students. Sipple said policies should facilitate opening more school-based clinics, easing funding and staffing issues.

“Expanding the number of school-based health centers should be a priority to enhance the well-being of urban and rural communities,” Sipple said.

For additional information, read this Cornell Chronicle story.

-30-

 

Brain drain? More like brain gain: How high-skilled emigration boosts global prosperity



Research finds the flows of talent spur education, innovation and economic growth in migrants’ home countries, which also reaps benefits for host countries



University of California - San Diego





As the national debate intensifies around immigration, a new study from the University of California School of Global Policy and Strategy is challenging conventional wisdom about “brain drain”—the idea that when skilled workers emigrate from developing countries, their home economies suffer.

Published in Science, the paper reveals high-skilled emigration from developing countries may actually boost economic development, human capital and innovation in migrants’ countries of origin. 

With the U.S. undergoing sweeping immigration policy shifts—which include tighter work visa rules, student visa restrictions and return migration barriers—the new research highlights how these changes will reverberate through the U.S. labor market and economies around the world.

“Global prosperity rises when countries have access to U.S. labor markets,” said Gaurav Khanna, study coauthor and associate professor at the UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy. “And the U.S. benefits when it continues to attract the best global talent — whether it’s tech innovators or trained nurses. But if we shut the door, we risk losing those global gains.”

Migration creates shared prosperity across borders 

The research offers compelling evidence that the opportunity to migrate to countries like the United States encourages people in lower-income countries to invest in education and training, creating downstream effects that strengthen both home and host countries.

The researchers also found that high-skilled migrants often maintain professional ties across borders, facilitating trade, investment and innovation. Migrants returning from the U.S. to their home countries, for example, have helped connect domestic firms to international supply chains and research partnerships.

“A lot of trade works through human networks,” said Khanna. “If you’ve worked in the U.S. and return home, you know the people, the standards, the markets — and you can help build business relationships. That creates lasting value.”

A global chain reaction

The paper documented how expanded migration opportunities can trigger a positive chain reaction. When the U.S. increased nursing visa access for Filipinos, for example, enrollment in nursing schools surged — creating nine new nurses in the Philippines for every one who migrated. Similar trends were observed in India, where increased access to H-1B visas increased the earnings of Indians in the U.S. by 10% and raised IT employment in India by 5.8%. 

Khanna and coauthors from Yale, Cornell, the World Bank, and other institutions, argue that recent changes in U.S. immigration risk undercutting both U.S. innovation and global progress.

“Earning a U.S. salary is incredibly lucrative,” said Khanna, who is a faculty affiliate at the 21st Century India Center, explained. “That motivates many people to acquire skills even if they never leave. Some eventually return home and work in their local economy; others send money back that helps educate children or launch businesses. All of this contributes to development. And for the U.S., by staying open to global talent, the country strengthens both its economy and the broader world.”

To understand whether high-skilled emigration helps or harms the countries people leave behind, the authors reviewed dozens of recent studies that took advantage of natural experiments. These include sudden changes in visa policies, international lotteries and other real-world events. The authors then analyzed how people and economies changed in response to these events — and compared them to similar groups that weren’t affected. 

Read the full study, "Brain Drain or Brain Gain? Effects of High-Skilled International Emigration on Origin Countries.” 

 

New study reveals impact of neighborhood disadvantage on menopause onset



Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute





Key Findings

  • Women living in neighborhoods with high vulnerability had a higher risk of earlier natural menopause onset, primarily due to socioeconomic status and household conditions.

  • No significant association was found between neighborhood disadvantage and the severity of menopause symptoms.

Boston, MA – A new study led by the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute highlights the significant impact of living in disadvantaged neighborhoods on the onset of menopause. The research followed 691 women from pregnancy to midlife and found that those residing in highly vulnerable neighborhoods, particularly within 10 years of perimenopause onset, experienced menopause approximately two years earlier than those in less vulnerable areas.

The study, “Neighborhood Vulnerability and Age of Natural Menopause and Menopause Symptoms Among Midlife Women” was published May 22 in JAMA Network Open.

Women experiencing more intense menopausal symptoms have demonstrated lower quality of life and cognitive performance. Additionally, women who undergo menopause at an earlier age face a higher risk of developing long-term health issues; specifically, a 1-year decrease in menopause age is linked to 2-3% higher risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality. At present, there are significant gaps in understanding how neighborhood contexts may affect reproductive aging in midlife women.

"Identifying risk factors for earlier menopause is important for public health, potentially informing strategies to reduce the potential for adverse outcomes. Our research indicates that living in less vulnerable neighborhoods may be a key factor in preventing earlier menopause and reducing future disease risk," said Izzuddin Aris, Harvard Medical School Assistant Professor of Population Medicine at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and senior author of the study.

The study included nearly 700 women from Project Viva, a prospective cohort in eastern Massachusetts, followed from April 1999 to August 2021. Researchers used geocoded residential addresses to assess neighborhood vulnerability and its effects on menopause onset and symptoms. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was used to measure neighborhood disadvantage, considering factors such as socioeconomic status, household composition, and racial and ethnic minority status. Study findings showed women who resided in neighborhoods with very high (vs. very low) vulnerability exhibited higher risk of earlier natural menopause onset (by approximately 2 years), driven primarily by socioeconomic status and household composition. No associations with menopause symptom severity were observed.

The findings underscore the necessity of addressing neighborhood contexts to level reproductive health outcomes across populations.

"As certain characteristics of disadvantaged neighborhoods, such as limited access to social and economic resources, can be modified through community-led initiatives or policies implemented at the local and federal levels, future research is warranted to investigate whether such strategies could alleviate the association between neighborhood disadvantage and early menopause," added Aris.


About the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute’s Department of Population Medicine
The Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute's Department of Population Medicine is a unique collaboration between Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Harvard Medical School. Created in 1992, it is the first appointing medical school department in the United States based in a health plan. The Institute focuses on improving health care delivery and population health through innovative research and education, in partnership with health plans, delivery systems, and public health agencies. Follow us on BlueskyX, and LinkedIn.
 

 

Green ammonia powered by sunlight



A process mimicking aspects of photosynthesis produces ammonia efficiently




University of Tokyo

Green ammonia. 

image: 

When the reaction takes place in optimal conditions, two nitrogen atoms and three water molecules form two ammonia molecules with only oxygen left over. ©2025 Nishibayashi et al. CC-BY-ND

view more 

Credit: ©2025 Nishibayashi et al. CC-BY-ND





Ammonia is a chemical essential to many agricultural and industrial processes, but it’s mode of production comes with an incredibly high energy cost. Various attempts have, and are, being made to produce ammonia more efficiently. For the first time, a group including researchers from the University of Tokyo combined atmospheric nitrogen, water and sunlight, and using two catalysts, produced sizable quantities of ammonia without a high energy cost. Their processes mirror natural processes found in plants utilizing symbiotic bacteria.

You’ve probably heard of ammonia, especially in relation to agriculture, where it’s an essential component of the fertilizers that feed the crops upon which all our lives depend. But here are some numbers to paint a picture of why ammonia is so important and impactful: Just under 200 million tons of ammonia are produced yearly, and 80% of this is used for fertilizer. Also, its production accounts for around 2% of the world's entire energy consumption and correspondingly around 2% of the world's entire carbon dioxide emissions. With these things in mind, it’s understandable why researchers around the world are trying to create a cleaner, more efficient means to produce ammonia.

Professor Yoshiaki Nishibayashi from the Department of Applied Chemistry at the University of Tokyo and his team have recently made significant strides in this goal. They succeeded in developing a novel catalytic system for producing ammonia from abundant molecules found on Earth, including atmospheric nitrogen and water. The key lies in a combination of two kinds of catalysts, intermediate compounds which enable or speed up reactions without contributing to the final mixture, made especially for ammonia production, and which are driven by sunlight.

“This is the first successful example of photocatalytic ammonia production using atmospheric dinitrogen as a nitrogen source and water as a proton source, that also uses visible light energy and two kinds of molecular catalysts,” said Nishibayashi. “We used an iridium photocatalyst and another chemical called a tertiary phosphine which enabled photochemical activation of water molecules. The reaction efficiencies were higher than expected, compared to previous reports of visible light-driven photocatalytic ammonia formation.”

The thing about chemical reactions is, they don’t always happen as fast as you want, or in the way that you want. And to control the outcome, efficiency, timing and so on of a process, you need to involve additional components beyond just the raw ingredients. This is where the catalysts come in. Nishibayashi and his team utilized two catalysts for these experiments, one based on the transition metal molybdenum for the activation of dinitrogen and the other based on the transition metal iridium for the photoactivation of both tertiary phosphines and water. A third component called tertiary phosphines are also key to helping get the protons out of water molecules.

“When the iridium photocatalyst absorbs sunlight, its excited state can oxidize the tertiary phosphines. The oxidized tertiary phosphines then activate water molecules via formation of a chemical bond between the phosphine’s phosphorous atom and the water, yielding protons,” said Nishibayashi. “The molybdenum catalyst then enables nitrogen to bond with these protons to become ammonia. The use of water for producing dihydrogen or hydrogen atoms is one of the most important processes for achieving green ammonia production.”

The team managed to produce this reaction at a scale 10 times that of previous experiments, suggesting it’s ready for trials at larger scales, though there are still some issues that could improve the safety and effectiveness further. Some of the components such as the tertiary phosphines could be made using solar power or recycled from phosphine oxides. And while stable themselves, they may be toxic if ingested by people, so it would be ideal to find a responsible way to dispose of or recycle them.

“In plants, ammonia is formed by biological nitrogen fixation using cyanobacteria and is linked with photosynthesis,” said Nishibayashi. “Here, the electrons for the reaction are supplied by photosynthesis and protons are derived from water. Therefore, the findings of our recent study can be regarded as a successful example of the artificial photosynthesis of ammonia.”

###

Journal article: Yasuomi Yamazaki, Yoshiki Endo, Yoshiaki Nishibayashi, “Catalytic ammonia formation from dinitrogen, water, and visible light energy”, Nature Communications, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59727-whttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59727-w


Funding: We acknowledge the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Nos. 20H05671, 24H00049, 24H01834, and 24K21778 to Y.N.; JP23H03832, JP23H03830, and 24K08441 to Y.Y.) from JSPS and MEXT. This paper is based on results obtained from a project, JPNP 21020, commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

 

About The University of Tokyo:

The University of Tokyo is Japan's leading university and one of the world's top research universities. The vast research output of some 6,000 researchers is published in the world's top journals across the arts and sciences. Our vibrant student body of around 15,000 undergraduate and 15,000 graduate students includes over 5,000 international students. Find out more at www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/ or follow us on X (formerly Twitter) at @UTokyo_News_en.