Sunday, June 29, 2025

British Government Declares Palestine Action Terrorists

June 26, 2025





The Labour government at Westminster proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation is a ridiculous undemocratic move by a government that only exists to perpetuate war and capitalism.

Two Palestine Action members damaged some war planes at a UK air base in protest against the genocide in Gaza and the escalation of the conflict into Iran. This led immediately to the government taking steps to put the protest group on a par with Al-Qaeda or Islamic State. A frightening overreach.

This coming from ex human rights lawyer Kier Starmer, a man who defended protestors who broke into an RAF base in 2003 and damaged planes in protest against the war in Iraq. Now his government is saying that people who throw paint at military aircraft are in the same category as those that fly commercial airlines into civilian buildings as happned in 9/11.

And Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, who stood up in parliament wearing suffragette ribbons to celebrate the fight for women to get the vote – the same movement that carried out direct action protests and caused all kinds of ‘nuisance’ for the governments of the day. What do they say about the liberals? They support every social movement apart from the present one.

A solidarity protest in London was attacked by the police with several arrests made on spurious grounds. The police were clearly spoiling for a fight and saw the government’s proposed ban as an excuse to do what they wanted.

Earlier in the day the chief of the Met Police Sir Mark Rowley had issued an outrageous statement saying the planned solidarity action left him “shocked and frustrated” that people would come out in support of Palestine Action. Shut up Sir Rowley, it isn’t your place to offer opinions on whether people should attend demonstrations or not.

The Labour government has kept the Tories draconian anti protest laws and sought to expand them. They have presided over the prosecution of peaceful protestors on conspiracy charges, landing them five years in prison (before they reduced that on appeal) – the longest prison sentence for non-violent protest ever handed down.

They are also going after the Irish rap group Kneecap for ‘supporting terrorism’ by allegedly having a Hezbollah flag on display at a gig. This government is one of the most illiberal ones for many years – targetting musicians for waving a flag is another example of the dangerous overreach of these police-politicians.
Reactionary wave

The clamp down on protest rights is happening as part of a global reactionary wave, a move towards authoritarian regimes that clamp down on civil and political rights and are seeking to roll back the gains of the last 50 years around women, LGBT and Black people’s rights.

As late capitalism gets worse, with greater wealth inequality, collapsing public services and horrific genocidal violence, more governments are imposing harsher laws and restrictions on our freedoms. They can see that social crises are growing but the politicians in power only want to protect the interests of a small group in society – the billionaires and capitalists.

The far right – normally free speech advocates when it comes to say anything racist or transphobic – back these moves, seeing them for what they are – an attack on working people and progressive voices fighting for a better world. The far right pose as anti establishment fighters but they are in reality just fighting on behalf of their super rich pay masters like Elon Musk and Arron Banks.
Diversion

Of course the proscription of Palestine Action is also to focus attention away from the genocide in Gaza and the escalation of war in Iran. Israel is effectively a rogue state, completely ignoring any principles of international law and expanding the war from Gaza to Iran on the spurious grounds that Iran might be developing weapons of mass destruction (those of us around in 2003 for the Iraq war movement will remember this same rhetoric!)

We are fighting for a better world for all and we won’t let government proscriptions or police violence or far right terror threat intimidate us. There are some many struggles against the crises of late capitalism and they are growing. We can link these struggles up to point to how capitalism and class society based on hierarchies of wealth and power are at the root cause of so many of these issues.

Some people say they want to leave the country. The reality is there are not many countries in the world that are not heading in this authoritarian direction. We have to fight where we are, working together to build powerful social movements and political parties that can contest for power to overthrow the capitalists and their state.

Simon Hannah is a socialist, a union activist, and the author of A Party with Socialists in it: a history of the Labour Left, Can’t Pay, Won’t Pay: the fight to stop the poll tax, and System Crash: an activist guide to making revolution.



Source: Freedom News

Palestine Action, it was announced on Friday, is set to become a proscribed group. The announcement was made less than twenty four hours after the group broke into RAF Brize Norton, “decommissioning two military aircrafts”. The rationalisation given for the group’s target was that “from Cyprus, British planes collect intelligence, refuel fighter jets, and transport weapons to commit genocide in Gaza”.

This is not a decision that has been made on a whim: it is the latest act in a campaign by the British state to quell movements of direct action who block the international trade of killing machines. It is a decision made precisely because of the Israel lobby in the UK, and those who receive payments from them. In many other countries this kind of “anti-terror” policing would be called corrupt, anti-democratic, and authoritarian, but it is the modus operandi for Starmer’s government.

Palestine Action was started in 2020 by Huda Ammori and Richard Barnard, the latter of whom is currently facing charges from August 2024 under the same Terrorism Act of 2000. The group has since undertaken some of the most impactful direct action campaigns in British history against Israel’s arms manufacturers and their backers. 

Perhaps their most influential campaign has been the fight against Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer. Elbit specialises in the manufacture of systems for aircraft used by the Israeli Defence Forces, as well as in the creation of what it describes as “the backbone” of Israel’s drone fleet.

The campaign has successfully led to the closing down of their London HQ and numerous factories across the country, such as Leicester, Oldham, and Tamworth. It is difficult to quantify just how much financial damage has been done to Elbit, but there is no doubt Palestine Action have put a major dent in the supply of weapons from the UK to Israel.

As a result, however, they’ve attracted a substantial amount of attention from some of the British establishment’s most vile figures. Once John Woodcock (Lord Walney) was finished allegedly sexually harassing his staff,  he was appointed independent advisor on Political Violence and Disruption in 2020. And in his detailed report, he called for Palestine Action, amongst others, to be banned or heavily restricted due to the harm they cause to “companies and their staff”, and the “detrimental effect they have on local economies”. It was utter nonsense then, and it is utter nonsense now.

Terrorism is a charged term. Some scholars dedicate their careers to studying its origins, manifestations, and effects. The definition of terrorism is hotly debated still, though there are some key aspects on which most scholars (like David Rapoport and Martha Crenshaw) agree. Broadly, terrorism involves violence and intimidation against non-combatants (i.e., civilians) in pursuit of a political outcome. How on Earth, then, does Palestine Action fit this definition?

The argument progresses even more infuriatingly when considering that even the Prime Minister stated in a tweet, soon after the action, that the break-in was an act of “vandalism”, not terrorism. No people were harmed during the process, the activists’ only targets were the aircraft used to wage war on civilians in Gaza. In contrast, Israel’s campaign has directly targeted civilians for the political end of grasping and holding greater land and resources, in violation of international law. Its terroristic genocide in Gaza is an ongoing aberration to everything these same politicians and commentators claim to stand for.

The death toll in Gaza is close to 63,000 at time of writing, and that is likely an underestimate. Men, women, and children whose lives have brutally severed short, whilst those with serious influence in the West watch on. That is what Palestine Action and other campaigns are attempting to stop. And because their choice of inanimate targets is both effective and ethical, the British government is attempting to ban them and legally smear them as a terrorist organisation. 

If the proscription is not defeated by public and political pressure, it will be the precedent for a much broader attack on the right to protest, affecting everyone who has ever engaged in politics even indirectly. The right to take collective action is gradually being carved out of our public lives, and we cannot allow that to continue. 


Source: Craig Murray Blog

If you thought RAF jets were owned by the RAF, think again.

The RAF squadron targeted for a repaint by Palestine Action due to its involvement in supplying Israel’s genocide, does not in fact belong to the RAF at all. It belongs ultimately to Polygon Global Partners LLP, a Hedge Fund.

Through a chain of seven cutout companies, which I will take you through, the direct ownership is with Airtanker Ltd, which gives its address as RAF Brize Norton. It owns, maintains and operates the RAF’s Voyager refuelling aircraft, which have been providing mid-air refuelling to the Israeli Defence Forces as well as carrying, in their cargo role, munitions to the IDF.

Note that Airtanker Ltd states that five of the Voyager aircraft while available to the RAF: “can also be made available to other parties. This can include providing military capability to other nations…”.

Whether the aircraft have been operated by the RAF on behalf of the Israelis, or whether they have been “provided to” the IDF direct, is an interesting question. Is this designed to build in plausible deniability for the UK government?

Eight of the Voyager Aircraft though fully painted in RAF livery, actually are the property of Airtanker Ltd.

It is not plain whether the other six – also the property of Airtanker Ltd but only occasionally used by the RAF – are also in RAF livery. The company does not show any photographs of jets not in RAF livery.

So who owns Airtanker Ltd? Well, the “person with significant control” on the Companies House register is Airtanker Holdings Ltd. They own over 75% but less than 100%. It would be interesting to know who owns the rest.

So who owns Airtanker Holdings Ltd? Well, it is owned – more than 25% and less than 50% – by Airbus, which provides the actual aircraft, and more than 25% and less than 50% by Equitix Capital Eurobond 6 Ltd, which presumably provides finance. As both own under 50% it would be interesting to know who owns the rest, and why.

So who owns Equitix Capital Eurobond 6 Ltd? Well, Equitix Capital Eurobond 6 Ltd is owned by Equitix Holdings Ltd, a company at the same address in the City of London.

So who owns Equitix Holdings Ltd? Well, Equitix Holdings Ltd is owned by Pace Bidco Ltd, a company curiously enough also at the same address.

So who owns Pace Bidco Ltd? Well, Pace Bidco Ltd is owned by Pace Topco Ltd, a company which turns out to be also at the same address!

So who owns Pace Topco Ltd? Well, here, we finally get the name of a human being. It is a Mr Reade Griffith whose address is given as Polygon Global Partners LLP, 4 Sloane St, London.

On another page of the register a Mr Reade Eugene Griffith is given as a Director of Pace Topco Ltd, presumably the same person. This would also appear to be the same individual as the E Griffith Reade who is listed as – amongst other interests – the 10% owner of Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc.

Polygon is a hedge fund. It would appear likely from the register to be either Polygon or Griffith’s umbrella hedge fund Tetragon that owns these liveried RAF aircraft. We have therefore simply no idea who the investors are: it could be anyone from Blackrock to Kim Jong Un. The true ownership is deliberately shrouded in secrecy.

This spaghetti tangle of ownership of RAF aircraft is rather surprising to those of us who naively believed that RAF military aircraft belonged to the RAF, and that the hundreds of billions of pounds the state lavishes on “defence” was used to do things like buy military jets, rather than make rich financiers still richer.

The long tree of subsidiary companies is not only to disguise ownership. At every single stage it provides opportunity for tax avoidance and for other forms of corruption, like consultancy contracts or directorships handed out to the contacts or nominated go-betweens of the politicians and senior civil servants. If you saw a company called Pace Bidco Ltd were giving a remunerative consultancy to the son of an ex-government minister, or to a firm registered to his local landlord, why would that ring alarm bells or connect to the RAF?

To be plain those are entirely hypothetical examples. I am not accusing Pace Bidco Ltd of anything. I merely explain the system.

Defence spending is more prone to corruption than any other form of spending and that is why venial politicians are always extremely keen to boost it. No UK politician has ever proposed to increase defence spending by more than Keir Starmer, who wants to lift it by £120 billion a year.

The RAF’s Voyager aircraft are effectively being provided under the Private Finance Initiative. Exactly how much money the hedge fund managers and this string of companies are taking out of the defence budget is hard to know.

One particularly surprising fact is that it is plain that the private companies are also providing the RAF ground crew. Who employs the flight crews is not entirely clear.

That such an obviously rotten and corrupt arrangement exists in the RAF I had no idea. Some British military personnel are in fact contracted mercenaries. It gives new context to the active RAF involvement in the Genocide in Gaza.

Palestine Action’s excellent act of resistance in vandalising this Hedge Fund Air Force has brought all of this to our attention. Which is yet a further reason to be grateful to Palestine Action.

U.S. Federal Workers Are Organizing For Democracy—From The Inside Out

By Chris Dols, Alissa Tafti
June 26, 2025
Source: Non Profit Quarterly


G. Edward Johnson, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

In the face of a relentless effort to dismantle the federal government from within, a new movement is taking shape—led not by politicians or pundits but by federal workers themselves. The largest effort to date is the Federal Unionists Network (FUN). The FUN is offering a direct response to sweeping purges, politicized restructuring, and the hollowing out of public institutions under President Donald Trump’s administration.

The FUN is a federal-sector workers-led network born from a crisis, grounded in solidarity, and driven by a vision to build a democratic, accountable, and community-rooted public sector—one that not only survives political assaults but can ensure that the government fulfills its promise of meeting people’s needs.

“If you give up your voice as soon as you’re under attack, you’ve already lost.”

What began in 2022 as a few dozen local leaders of federal unions organizing for stronger protections and supporting each other on a group text, has quickly grown into a multiagency organizing force. The network spans dozens of federal agencies—from veterans’ services to environmental protection, from public health to infrastructure. And the core message is clear: We are committed to public service. We will fight back against authoritarian attacks. And we will work together to create the conditions necessary to build a government that serves the public good.
Finding Our Voice

One of the FUN’s earliest and most powerful principles is voice. For decades, federal workers have been expected to remain invisible—diligent but silent. But federal workers took an oath to serve and protect the Constitution and that means protecting and serving our communities. When institutions are gutted, programs shuttered, and colleagues fired en masse, silence is no longer an option.

“We are speaking out in our own names and our own stories,” Paul Osadebe, a FUN organizer and trial attorney with the Department of Housing and Urban Development told NPQ. “Because if you give up your voice as soon as you’re under attack, you’ve already lost.”

That message has reverberated. Federal workers who once operated quietly behind the scenes are now appearing on picket lines and press conferences, giving face and voice to the programs and protections that hundreds of millions of people rely on.

This is not just resistance to false narratives about government bloat or inefficiency. It’s a rebuttal to the deeper attack—that public service is itself suspect, that governance is inherently broken, and that communities are better left to fend for themselves.

This is not about waste, fraud, or abuse. This is about corporate theft, authoritarianism, and stripping away the protections that keep working people from total dependence on billionaires.
A Culture of Courage and Joy

The FUN was created not only to organize but to counter fear. In agencies across the country, fear is being used as a weapon: fear of retaliation, of firing, of surveillance. Many federal workers were understandably paralyzed in the early weeks of 2025, but our message is simple: Fear cannot dictate strategy.

“There is risk,” Mark Smith, a FUN organizer and occupational therapist at Veterans Affairs, bluntly told NPQ. “But it is better to put your own narrative out there than to comply in advance. That’s how they win—by convincing you to disappear before they even make the demand.”

Our goal isn’t just trying to survive this moment—it is to transform it, by helping federal service better serve its core purpose: the public good.

Public actions—like the “Save Our Services” rallies held in over 20 cities in February 2025—serve not just as political statements but as collective courage rituals. They give both workers and allies the chance to meet and see each other, stand together, and break through the narrative that resistance is futile.

As FUN organizer and Environmental Protection Agency employee Drew Curtis said to NPQ, “If [the Trump administration’s] strategy is to demobilize us with despair, then our job is to get loud, visible, and organized.”
Building Coalitions

From the start, we knew we needed to build something different and reimagine the terrain of federal worker organizing itself.

That meant working across constituencies, no matter what agency, local union, or profession federal workers were in. We needed to create a movement where people’s job title or agency they worked for was not what primarily defined them; where scientists, caseworkers, analysts, and administrative staff all saw themselves in the same fight and connected through a common vision. Federal workers are also seeing themselves as a central part of the larger labor movement in solidarity with teachers, janitors, hotel workers, and more.

This vision has given rise to regional hubs involving multiple unions, cross-agency coalitions, and new partnerships that defy traditional organizing models. All work to strengthen our union locals, federal sector unions, and the national labor movement, so we can lead together in this moment of crisis.

Together, in places where union membership is low, we are supporting the growth of our union movement. In places with strong union locals, FUN organizers are working to deepen alignment with broader pro-democracy goals. Everywhere, the focus is on connection across silos.
Forging Durable, Sustainable Power from the Inside Out

Labor organizing doesn’t stop at the federal workforce. We know that we are part of a much wider struggle for community survival and democratic renewal. That means building alliances—deep, durable ones—with communities, faith groups, social justice organizations, and the wider labor movement.

The future of democracy will be shaped by a worker-led and grassroots-driven labor movement.

“Public workers don’t serve abstract systems,” explained MT Snyder, a FUN organizer and field examiner at the National Labor Relations Board. “We serve communities—families, veterans, immigrants, seniors, kids. If we’re under attack, so are they. And we want them in this fight with us.”

That approach has led us to collaborate with a wide range of civil society networks and unions, and cosponsor rallies that include everything from housing justice to climate groups. Our goal isn’t just trying to survive this moment—it is to transform it, by helping federal service better serve its core purpose: the public good.

For this reason, we are already looking ahead. FUN members intend not just to resist current cuts but be part of rebuilding the federal sector—harnessing the expertise, passion, and insight of our members to create a more responsive blueprint for our agencies. Because we have no intention of going back to the way things were, we are looking to build something better. The nation’s founding documents promised a government for the people, and we already knew the pre-2025 reality fell far short of that vision. Federal worker leadership can bring us far closer to that ideal.
Strategy in the Face of Crisis

The FUN’s growth has not been accidental. It is guided by strategy—one grounded in the history of the labor movement and solidarity and a clear-eyed understanding of the authoritarian playbook.

The network’s strategy includes:Organizing where union membership is low. Supporting local unions in creating a clear path for workers who have never been engaged in collective action.
Strengthening existing unions. Providing connection and support, political education, and national coordination across union efforts to help local workers resist purges and build public support, because when our federal sector unions are stronger, our country is as well.
Building cross-sector alliances. Creating one front with the full breadth of the labor movement and civil society, because federal workers can’t win this fight alone. It’s all one attack.
Speaking publicly, relentlessly. Changing the narrative from one of apathy and technocracy to one of resistance and public service.
Creating the vision and blueprint. For the federal government that serves all by tapping the expertise of the federal workers who know it best and the communities the government should serve and protect.

As Osadebe explained, “We have a theory of change. We have an idea of how we can respond in a way that engages people that gives them hope that is not just false. We are trying to give people who are scared and uncertain something they can do—a way they can individually and collectively respond and build power and take back power from the people who are concentrating it.”

While it may be unexpected for many to see federal workers thrust into a movement leadership role, we are ready for the front lines. The good news is that we know what’s required. The future of democracy will be shaped by a worker-led and grassroots-driven labor movement. By reinforcing core principles of solidarity, we can forge a path forward.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers. Donate



Chris Dols is coexecutive director of the Federal Unionist Network and was a federal government worker until early 2025. Dols spent over eight years as a civil engineer for the US Army Corps of Engineers and served as president of the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) Local 98.
Source: CounterPunch

From Los Alamos to Kwajalein (the Bechtel-built Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Test Site in the Marshall Islands) to Iraq, war, preparation for war, and profiting from war’s devastation are all profit centers for Bechtel.

—Western States Legal Foundation

One June 10, during a week of talk about bombs before bombs fell, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard dropped her own before she apparently caved under pressure from Trump:

This isn’t some made-up science fiction story. This is the reality of what’s at stake, what we are facing now, because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.

Perhaps it’s because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won’t have access to.

The Bechtel Corporation, second largest construction firm in the United States, manages both Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and  Los Alamos National Laboratory and is the major construction contractor at the federal Department of Energy Savannah River Site, a nuclear-waste management complex. The three nuclear facilities are embarked on a multi-billion-dollar project to produce a new generation of nuclear weapons triggers, a vital component in the new nuclear arms race. Brendan Bechtel, fifth-generation CEO and chairman of the board of his family’s company, is a member of the political elite and leads a company with its own foreign policy. It is “an entity so powerful, so international in scope, that its officers…could move to the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State respectively as if they were merely shifting assignments at Bechtel,” wrote California historian.

Sally Denton, author of The Profiteers: Bechtel and the Men Who Built the World (2016), began her chapter on Bechtel’s takeover of the nation’s nuclear laboratories:

With the labs run at a profit, and with the cost-plus, risk-free business model invented by Steve (Bechtel) Sr. and John McCone in the late 1930s to build pipelines in the Middle East, Bechtel’s 30 percent guaranteed management fee and indemnification from liability would give it a monopoly on the country’s nuclear stockpile.

Western States Legal Foundation concluded, “From Los Alamos to Kwajalein (the Bechtel-built Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Test Site in the Marshall Islands) to Iraq, war, preparation for war, and profiting from war’s devastation are all profit centers for Bechtel.”

When Bechtel took over the LANL and LLNL from the University of California in the early 2000s, “Operational costs at the labs soared … with American taxpayers shelling out $40 million more per year for Livermore alone. Fees paid to … administer Los Alamos and Livermore jumped by 850 percent and 600 percent, respectively,” Denton reported. “Executive salaries also swelled, with the Los Alamos director’s salary shooting from $348,000 to $1.1 million—more than double that of the US president.” When Bechtel took over LLNL, they fired 430 career employees in the first week, one senior official at the lab describing the new management style as combining “the worse aspects of the Department of Motor Vehicles and Goldman Sachs,” Denton wrote.

Denton reflected, at the conclusion her 300-page study of the Bechtels:

The Bechtel story is most important for how the company embodies the rise of a corporate capitalism forged in the American West that over the decades took the world by storm—a capitalism much more in line with cronyism than free market ideology. Bechtel pioneered the revolving door system that now pervades both US politics and the American economic system–a door that came to shape foreign policy not always in the interest of the nation and its citizens, but for the interests of multinational corporations.

In the end, this is the ugly, untold story of America. A story not of the triumph of laissez faire capitalism, but of Profiteers whose sole client was government itself.

The Union of Concerned Scientists’ Doomsday Clock still stood at three minutes when Denton finished her book in 2016. This year it stands at 89 seconds, closer to nuclear war than it ever has since it was begun by Albert Einstein, Robert Oppenheimer and others in 1947.

Several anti-nuclear-weapons activist groups have joined in a lawsuit to fight the production of new warheads, using the National Environmental Protection Act. A federal district-court judge in South Carolina1 agreed with the groups’ attorneys that since the production of plutonium-pit triggers involved at least two nuclear labs across the nation, the environmental impact statement the government had prepared was inadequate and that a programmatic EIS must be prepared to reflect impacts across the nation from the transport and the design and development of the triggers in South Carolina, New Mexico, and California. The South Carolina Environmental Law Project represented the Gullah/Geechee Sea Island Coalition, Nuclear Watch New Mexico, Savannah River Site Watch, and Tri-Valley CAREs in the successful suit against the National Nuclear Security Administration, “a semi-autonomous agency within DOE that designs and delivers a safe, secure, reliable, and effective U.S. nuclear stockpile.” Denton reported that in the first seven years of its existence, NNSA’s budget “jumped to one and a half times what the nuclear weapons budget had been at the height of the Cold War.”

Republican Congressman David Hobson called it “the ultimate white-collar welfare.”

“Profits and nuclear weapons don’t mix,” said a former general counsel for NNSA.

“The labs were now run by outsiders from private industry who reflected a different ethos than that of the traditional scientists,” Denton wrote.

However, according to Ben Cunningham of South Carolina-based SCELP,2 the use of environmental law in court so impressed the Nobel Prize Center that it has invited SCELP members to Oslo on August 6, the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima atomic bombing to speak on the importance of the greater environmental scrutiny provided by the programmatic environmental impact statement.  The groups were also honored in Washington DC on June 10 by the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability.

The PEIS will be ready in about a year. Comments on its scope3 may be made until July14 and can be emailed to PitPEIS@nnsa.doe.gov. After completion of the PEIS, in-person public hearings will be held in Livermore, CA; Santa Fe, NM; Kansas City, MO; Aiken, SC; and Washington, DC.

Many speakers in two virtual zoom meetings with NNSA commented that the government had not allowed enough time in the scoping period. Others, experts in specific aspects of the EIS, took them on in detail. Two people from Santa Fe, NM also noted that there was no place in the scoping requirements for “moral, ethical, or spiritual concerns.” This is presumably because such things are neither material nor quantifiable, therefore do not exist in the ideology of materialist scientism that dominates the nuclear “community” and the government regulators drawn from its midst, whose addicts are capable of blowing up the world for somebody’s profit.

Meanwhile, the Trumpers are busy trying to destroy any mention of environmental law forevermore. In the words of Sacramento lawyer/blogger, Casey A. Shorrock:

…Everyone4 from law firm bloggers to the Rolling Stone are reporting on the Trump Administration’s recent evisceration of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations and standards. On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14154, “Unleashing American Energy,” which, most notably: (i) revoked a 1977 Carter Administration executive order directing the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to adopt binding NEPA regulations; (ii) provided 30 days for CEQ to propose rescinding its NEPA regulations; and (iii) directed CEQ to issue guidance on NEPA implementation “to expedite and simplify the permitting process.” A day later, President Trump issued Executive Order 1417, “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-based Opportunity,” rescinding a Clinton-era executive order requiring federal agencies to address environmental justice issues in minority and low-income populations, which ultimately has resulted in nearly 30 years’ worth of NEPA documents including environmental justice analyses. Then, as a kind of regulatory hat trick, in order to comply with Executive Order 14154, on February 25, 2025, CEQ published its interim final rule, “Removal of National Environmental Policy Regulations,” to take effect 45 days from publication and remove “all iterations” of CEQ’s NEPA regulations, including the version changed during the first Trump Administration in 2020 and the version promulgated thereafter by the Biden Administration.

It isn’t just that the environment is losing in this scenario; special private interests, not the public, are being handed a very large prize, all bought and paid for. In the words of an oil executive in the movie, Syriana:5 “Corruption is why we win.”

But what will be left for the political elite and warmongers to win after their “winnable” nuclear war? What good is a wholesale attack of dubious legality on environmental law if the environment is reduced to flames and ashes because certain elites figure they could survive nuclear war and get richer while snuggled together a half a mile beneath the tree roots negotiating a no-bid contract with the president for reconstruction of the country?

In a letter titled, “On My Participation in the Atomic Bomb Project,” published by the Japanese socialist magazine, Kaizo, in 1952, Albert Einstein wrote against the weapons governments produce, not yet imagining the profit motive presently driving American warhead development:

As long however, as nations are not ready to abolish war by common action and to solve their conflicts in a peaceful way on a legal basis, they feel compelled to prepare for war. They feel moreover compelled to prepare the most abominable means, in order not to be left behind in the general armaments race. Such procedure leads inevitably to war, which, in turn, under today’s conditions, spells universal destruction.

Under such circumstances there is no hope in combating the production of specific weapons or means of destruction. Only radical abolition of war and of danger of war can help. Toward this goal one should strive; in fact nobody should allow himself to be forced into actions contrary to this goal. This is a harsh demand for anyone who is aware of his social inter-relatedness; but it can be followed.

Gandhi, the greatest political genius of our time has shown the way and has demonstrated that sacrifices man is willing to bring if only he has found the right way. His work for the liberation of India is a living example that man’s will, sustained by an indomitable conviction is stronger than apparently invincible material power.6

NOTES

  1. https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/01/31/hot-plutonium-pit-bomb-redux/ ↩︎
  2. https://nukewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Settlement-Reached-in-Historic-NEPA-Lawsuit-Over-Plutonium-Pit-Bomb-Core-Production.pdf ↩︎
  3. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/05/09/2025-08140/notice-of-intent-to-prepare-a-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-for-plutonium-pit ↩︎
  4. https://somachlaw.com/policy-alert/nepa-and-ceqa-the-times-they-are-a-changin/ ↩︎
  5. https://imsdb.com/scripts/Syriana.html ↩︎
  6. https://www.iflscience.com/on-my-participation-in-the-atomic-bomb-project-einsteins-powerful-letter-goes-up-for-auction-for-150000-79723 ↩︎

Overfishing is plundering waters in Africa


Saturday 28 June 2025, by Paul Martial

The scarcity of fish resources on the African coasts comes from climate change and especially from overfishing for the benefit of agri-food multinationals in rich countries. The testimonies of artisanal fishers converge: catches are decreasing and so is the size of the fish. According to experts, the 51 species inhabiting African waters — an essential source of food for the population — are now threatened with extinction. In Senegal, in just five years, the number of sardinella has fallen by 80%. This small, very inexpensive pelagic fish is at the heart of the popular diet and is used in the composition of the national dish: thieboudien.


The scarcity of fish products is a source of deep concern for many Africans. In several coastal countries, fish accounts for nearly half of animal protein intake. According to economists, small-scale fisheries employ about 12 million people in Africa — fishers, fishmongers, smokers, vendors.
Climate change and overfishing

The two main factors in the decline in resources are climate change and overfishing. Rising temperatures are not only affecting the earth: the oceans are also warming, disrupting complex ecosystems. The consequences are varied: the disappearance of corals, the migration of coastal species to colder waters, the destruction of mangroves — a phenomenon of particular concern for Africa. Often compared to nurseries for fish, these areas provide them with shelter from predators until adulthood. They are also suitable for rice cultivation.

Overfishing is also linked to the increase in the number of artisanal fishers. Faced with massive unemployment among young people, many are trying their luck in this sector. In Sierra Leone, a small country in West Africa, their number has doubled in twenty years, from 75,000 to 150,000.
Deleterious industrial fishing

But this reality should not mask the main cause of resource depletion: industrial fishing. veritable factory ships crisscross the African coasts all year round. With their giant nets, they scrape the seabed, capturing all the fauna and causing considerable ecological damage.

The rules governing fishing in exclusive economic zones vary from country to country, but they are considered insufficient and poorly respected, both by artisanal professionals and by environmental activists. In Sierra Leone, a fishing license costs between 15,000 and 20,000 euros depending on the tonnage of the boat, and allows fishing all year round. Circumvention practices are frequent: the use of local nominees allows industrial vessels to obtain fishing rights near the coast while benefiting from exemptions on fuel and aid for administrative and port costs.
The rise of flour factories

IUU (illegal, unreported and unregulated) fishing thrives thanks to the lack of maritime means of African states, which are unable to monitor and board offending vessels. Industrial fishing is progressing not only to meet Western demand, but also to supply the many oil and fishmeal production plants. About sixty factories of this type have been set up in recent years on the West African coast. As a result, fish resources are diverted from local consumption. Greenpeace estimates that every year, 500,000 tonnes of fish – enough to feed 33 million people in Africa – are processed into flour. This meal is used to fatten farmed fish (tuna, salmon) for the European and Chinese markets, or to feed industrial pig farms.

19 June 2025

Translated by International Viewpoint from l’Anticapitaliste.


Attached documentsoverfishing-is-plundering-waters-in-africa_a9058.pdf (PDF - 905.9 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9058]


Paul Martiall is a correspondent for International Viewpoint. He is editor of Afriques en Lutte and a member of the Fourth International in France.


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.