Tuesday, July 01, 2025

 

Creativity across disciplines



PNAS Nexus
La Femme au Cheval 

image: 

Jean Metzinger, 1911–1912, La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a Horse), oil on canvas, Statens Museum for Kunst. A favorite painting of the physicist Niels Bohr.

view more 

Credit: Jean Metzinger





In a Perspective, Julio M. Ottino describes different classes of creativity and proposes a benchmark for the highest level of creativity. Combinative creativity is the process of combining existing elements to create new solutions, while transformative creativity leads to entirely new frameworks. But beyond the breakthroughs of transformative creativity, according to Ottino, is the “break-with,” a conceptual advance that destroys previous worldviews completely and ushers in a new order. Advances that rise to the level of a break-with include quantum mechanics in physics and cubism in visual art. Although AI excels in combinatorial creativity, Ottino says large language models struggle to be transformationally creative, and their reliance on training data may limit their ability to come up with solutions that represent a true break with the past. The Perspective includes case studies of historical figures who demonstrate creative fluidity, including Filippo Brunelleschi, the 15th century architect and engineer; Galileo Galilei, the 17th century astronomer and artist; Louis Pasteur, the 19th century scientist and lithographer; Jules Henri Poincaré, the early 20th century mathematician and essayist; Santiago Ramón y Cajal, the early 20th century neuroscientist and artist; and Niels Bohr, the early 20th century physicist and art explainer. 

 

Youngest in class at higher risk of mental health problems



ADHD was the most prevalent diagnosis, where researchers saw an increase in incidence of 20-80 per cent for the youngest class members.



Norwegian University of Science and Technology





A recent study by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) has found that children born in October, November or December are statistically more often identified as having a mental health diagnosis than their classmates born earlier in the year. The findings apply to both boys and girls, and regardless of whether they were born full term or prematurely.

Extensive research material

The researchers have followed over one million Norwegians aged 4 to 17 years (all born between 1991 and 2012) through Norwegian health registries.

The aim of the study was to identify what are known as ‘relative age effects’. In other words, whether children and adolescents born late in the year are more frequently diagnosed with mental health disorders than their peers born early in the year (January, February and March).

“Our findings show that the youngest members of a school class tend to be diagnosed with a mental illness more frequently than the oldest,” said Christine Strand Bachmann, a PhD research fellow at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU’s) Department of Public Health and Nursing.

“This is most obvious with regard to ADHD, where we saw an increase in incidence of 20-80 per cent for the youngest class members, depending on whether the children were born full term or prematurely.”

The researchers found the same trend for ‘other neuropsychiatric disorders’. These include delayed developments in areas such as language, academic skills and motor skills.

The study has been published in BMJ Peadiatrics Open.

Additional risks for premature girls

In addition, the youngest premature girls were at a significantly greater risk of being diagnosed with emotional disorders, such as anxiety, depression and adaptation disorders, compared with the oldest premature girls in the same year group.

“We know that children and adolescents born prematurely are already more vulnerable to poor mental and social health compared with children and young people born full term. For those born prematurely, the risks associated with being born late in the year comes in addition to this vulnerability.

“We believe that these findings, which show an increase in the number of psychological diagnoses for the youngest class members, can partly be linked to the way in which we organize our education system. The school system is unable to adequately provide for children with normal, but more immature behaviour. Possible solutions include flexible school start dates or additional support.”

In addition to being a researcher at NTNU, Christine Strand Bachmann is also a consultant at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children and Adolescent Medicine Department, St. Olavs Hospital.

Reference:
Christine Strand Bachmann, Kari Risnes, Johan Håkon Bjørngaard et al: Relative age as a risk factor for psychiatric diagnoses in children born preterm and to term: a cohort study BMJ Pediatrics Open, 5 April 2025

 

Champions for change – Paid time off initiative just made clinical trials participation easier



The American Thoracic Society now provides employees with paid time-off to enroll in medical research.




American Thoracic Society

Clinical Trials Access 

image: 

ATS  is one of seven organizations providing employees with paid time off for clinical trials. 

view more 

Credit: ATS





NEW YORK, NY – July 1, 2025 – Research has always been critical to improving patient lives. That is why the American Thoracic Society (ATS), a Coalition to Transform Clinical Trial Engagement Steering Committee (CTCTE) member, is proud to be one of seven organizations partnering with the Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research (FSR) to make it easier for patients, including those with chronic lung disease, to join research. The Champions for Change – Paid Time Off (PTO) Initiative is a national effort to reduce job-related barriers to clinical trial participation by partnering with employers to provide PTO for employees enrolling in trials.

Clinical trials drive medical innovation and often offer patients access to better treatment options. Yet those who could benefit most are frequently left out due to systemic barriers to participation. According to FSR’s national IRB-approved survey of Black patients with sarcoidosis, limited paid time off, inflexible work schedules, and income loss from missed work were cited as barriers to joining or completing a clinical trial.

Other regional and national studies have come to the same conclusion about job-related barriers contributing to lower enrollment and retention – especially among underserved communities. These burdens lead to exclusion from trials, which not only harms the communities most impacted by chronic conditions but also jeopardizes the clinical trials enterprise by failing to include patients from all backgrounds—limiting what we learn about potential treatments.

This initiative builds upon the work of the FSR and CTCTE which resulted in clarification from the Department of Labor issued in November of 2024, which indicates that the Family Medical Leave Act ensures job security for anyone living with chronic disease in the U.S. or their family member caregivers who enroll in clinical trials.

“As the President and CEO of a mid-size health-focused non-profit, I am acutely aware that the health of my employees is essential to the success of our organization. By providing my employees with paid time off for clinical trial participation, I not only signal to my employees that I care about them and their health and wellbeing, but it also starts the conversation at the workplace about the power of clinical trial participation to advance the development of better therapies and outcomes for all impacted by chronic diseases.  FSR appreciates ATS’s leadership on this initiative and as a member of the CTCTE, and call on other companies to join us to offer this as a benefit to their employees,” said Mary McGowan, who represents the FSR as a member of the Public Advisory Roundtable, the patient arm of the ATS.

“The burden of chronic lung diseases is very high and requires innovation, vision and collaboration across disciplines and communities. The patient community is critical in helping research scientists find the answers to extend the lives of patients and eradicate disease,” said ATS President Raed Dweik, MD, MBA, ATSF. “I am proud that the American Thoracic Society is leading the charge in taking this bold step to stand up for patient and their families as a Champion for Change. I am grateful to the Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research for their partnership and vision.”

The initiative was first introduced in May of 2023 by FSR at a Congressional Briefing in response to barriers identified in FSR’s 60-page white paper as part of a comprehensive roadmap to expand engagement of underrepresented communities in clinical trials. This year on Clinical Trials Day the initiative went public with seven national partners, including the ATS, committed to championing change for clinical trials in the workplace.

Listen to FSR President and CEO Mary McGowan discuss the initiative on the ATS Breathe Easy – The Latest podcast.

Founding members of the Champions for Change – PTO Initiative:
American Thoracic Society, Diverse Research Now, Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Mural Health, Recursion, and Sabai Global. Each of these employers has committed to providing at least one day of paid time off for employees participating in clinical trials— demonstrating their leadership in expanding access and driving innovation in medical research.

For more information about the Champions for Change – PTO Initiative and how to join the Coalition to Transform Clinical Trial Engagement, visit ignorenomore.org.



MSU study unpacks how 2025 tariffs shocked global supply chain

2025 saw the largest U.S. tariff increases since the Great Depression.




Michigan State University




Why this matters:

  • 2025 saw the largest U.S. tariff increases since the Great Depression.

  • The study outlines a theoretical framework for understanding how increases in tariffs as well as uncertainty about tariffs affect importer and exporter behaviors.

  • Researchers also provide guidance for studying tariff impacts across industries, from consumer goods to agriculture.

EAST LANSING, Mich. — In the wake of the largest series of U.S. tariff hikes since 1930, a new study from Michigan State University explores how this economic shock is reshaping global supply chains and offers a framework to help researchers and policymakers make sense of the chaos. The study was recently published in the Journal of Supply Chain Management.

“Unlike previous trade wars, the 2025 actions came with extreme uncertainty,” said Jason Miller, lead author of the study and the Eli Broad Endowed Professor in Supply Chain Management at MSU. “We wanted to provide a framework to help researchers and practitioners make sense of what’s happening and what to expect going forward.”

The paper outlines a theoretical framework around categories of costs firms must navigate in response to tariffs: adjustment costs, transaction costs, and the opportunity costs of responding too early or too late.

These costs influence a firm’s ability, and willingness, to shift suppliers, relocate production or pass price increases on to consumers. The framework builds on and extends existing theory by directly incorporating the role of uncertainty and potential misconduct in firm responses, offering a more comprehensive view of how firms navigate trade shocks. Unlike previous trade disputes, the 2025 tariffs were enacted, reversed and reinstated in rapid succession, creating a volatile environment that makes planning nearly impossible.

“I’ve spoken with industry professionals who have described large importers having at least five, and sometimes 10, different plans sketched out because they cannot anticipate what the final form of tariffs will look like,” said Miller.

Societal impact of the tariffs

While the study is anchored in supply chain theory, the authors emphasize that these disruptions have real societal consequences for households and consumers.

“Imported food products, from fruits to coffee, are particularly sensitive to trade policy changes,” said David Ortega, a study co-author and the Noel W. Stuckman Chair in Food Economics and Policy at MSU. “When tariffs are imposed or threatened, that leads to price increases, sourcing challenges and more strain on lower-income households.”

The authors note that products with limited domestic production, such as bananas or pineapples, offer little room for substitution, which makes food prices especially vulnerable to trade shocks.

“Tariff-driven price increases have real-world consequences,” said Ortega. “They shape what people can afford at the grocery store, and retaliatory actions from other countries can impact what farmers grow. These ripple effects matter and affect everyone.”

A roadmap for research and policy analysis

Beyond the framework, the paper outlines various research directions and provides a curated list of data sources, ranging from firm-level trade records to import/export price indexes and sector-specific data. These tools allow researchers to analyze:

  • how and when firms shift sourcing to different countries;
  • the extent of tariff pass-through to retail prices;
  • the timing of inventory buildups or front-loading of imports;
  • instances of potential misconduct, like falsifying country-of-origin documentation.

Yao “Henry” Jin, associate professor at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business and a study co-author, said the study aims to equip scholars and practitioners alike.

“The framework offered by our research can help the industrial sector navigate our new and uncomfortable reality as a stable global supply chain built on a belief in free trade gives way to rising geopolitical uncertainty and protectionism,” Jin said.

The authors said they hope the framework can serve as a launchpad for more empirical work on the short- and long-term impacts of trade shocks, especially in areas like sourcing strategies, retail pricing and global manufacturing realignment.

“We need better ways to study and manage the consequences of these trade actions,” Miller said. “Whether you’re a policymaker, an importer, retailer or a consumer — you’re affected when supply chains are thrown into turmoil. This research helps us understand how and why.”

###

Michigan State University has been advancing the common good with uncommon will for 170 years. One of the world’s leading public research universities, MSU pushes the boundaries of discovery to make a better, safer, healthier world for all while providing life-changing opportunities to a diverse and inclusive academic community through more than 400 programs of study in 17 degree-granting colleges.

For MSU news on the web, go to MSUToday or x.com/MSUnews

 


Exposure to air pollution may cause heart damage





Radiological Society of North America
Exposure to Air Pollution May Cause Heart Damage 

image: 

Images from cardiac MRI native T1 mapping show that higher long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with higher extent of myocardial fibrosis.

view more 

Credit: Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)




OAK BROOK, Ill. – Researchers using cardiac MRI have found that long-term exposure to air pollution is associated with early signs of heart damage, according to a study that was published today in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). The research indicates that fine particulate matter in the air may contribute to diffuse myocardial fibrosis, a form of scarring in the heart muscle that can precede heart failure.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. There is a large body of evidence linking poor air quality with cardiovascular disease. However, the underlying changes in the heart resulting from air pollution exposure are unclear.

“We know that if you’re exposed to air pollution, you’re at higher risk of cardiac disease, including higher risk of having a heart attack,” said the study’s senior author Kate Hanneman, M.D., M.P.H., from the Department of Medical Imaging at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and University Health Network in Toronto. “We wanted to understand what drives this increased risk at the tissue level.”

Dr. Hanneman and colleagues used cardiac MRI, a noninvasive imaging technique, to quantify myocardial fibrosis and assess its association with long-term exposure to particles known as PM2.5. At 2.5 micrometers in diameter or less, PM2.5 particles are small enough to enter the bloodstream through the lungs. Common sources include vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions and wildfire smoke.

The researchers wanted to evaluate the effects of air pollution on both healthy people and those with heart disease, so the study group included 201 healthy controls and 493 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, a disease that makes it more difficult for the heart to pump blood.

Higher long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution was linked with higher levels of myocardial fibrosis in both the patients with cardiomyopathy and the controls, suggesting that myocardial fibrosis may be an underlying mechanism by which air pollution leads to cardiovascular complications. The largest effects were seen in women, smokers and patients with hypertension.

The study adds to growing evidence that air pollution is a cardiovascular risk factor, contributing to residual risk not accounted for by conventional clinical predictors such as smoking or hypertension.

“Even modest increases in air pollution levels appear to have measurable effects on the heart,” Dr. Hanneman said. “Our study suggests that air quality may play a significant role in changes to heart structure, potentially setting the stage for future cardiovascular disease.”

Knowing a patient’s long-term air pollution exposure history could help refine heart disease risk assessment and address the health inequities that air pollution contributes to both in level of exposure and effect. For instance, Dr. Hanneman said, if an individual works outside in an area with poor air quality, healthcare providers could incorporate that exposure history into heart disease risk assessment.

The air pollution exposure levels of the patients in the study were below many of the global air quality guidelines, reinforcing that there are no safe exposure limits.

“Public health measures are needed to further reduce long-term air pollution exposure,” Dr. Hanneman said. “There have been improvements in air quality over the past decade, both in Canada and the United States, but we still have a long way to go.”

In addition to illuminating the links between air pollution and myocardial fibrosis, the study highlights the important role that radiologists will play in research and clinical developments going forward.

“Medical imaging can be used as a tool to understand environmental effects on a patient’s health,” Dr. Hanneman said. “As radiologists, we have a tremendous opportunity to use imaging to identify and quantify some of the health effects of environmental exposures in various organ systems.”


Diagram shows summary of study purpose, exposure, outcome, and key results. Higher long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate air pollution is associated with greater diffuse myocardial fibrosis at cardiac MRI native T1 mapping in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and controls with normal MRI findings. PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with 2.5-µm or smaller aerodynamic diameter.

Credit

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

###

“Association between Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Myocardial Fibrosis Assessed with Cardiac MRI.” Collaborating with Dr. Hanneman were Jacques du Plessis, M.D., Chloe DesRoche, M.D., M.Sc., Scott Delaney, Sc.D., J.D., M.P.H., Rachel C. Nethery, Ph.D., Rachel Hong, B.Sc., Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, M.D., S.M., Heather Ross, M.D., M.H.Sc., and Felipe Castillo, M.D.

Radiology is edited by Linda Moy, M.D., New York University, New York, N.Y., and owned and published by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. (https://pubs.rsna.org/journal/radiology)

RSNA is an association of radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists and related scientists promoting excellence in patient care and health care delivery through education, research and technologic innovation. The Society is based in Oak Brook, Illinois. (RSNA.org)

For patient-friendly information on cardiac MRI, visit RadiologyInfo.org.

 

Research from the University of Kansas suppresses coronavirus by targeting Mac1



University of Kansas





LAWRENCE — A new study published in mBio details the vulnerability of coronaviruses to inhibitors of a small protein domain called Mac1, or the “macrodomain,” found in all coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV.

The findings point toward potential antiviral therapies to combat future coronavirus pandemics and confirm the importance of Mac1 to the viability of the virus.

“The macrodomain is critical for the virus’s ability to cause disease,” said Anthony Fehr, associate professor of molecular biosciences at the University of Kansas, who led the research. “We’ve known for a long time, based on our work and that of others, this gene is really important for the virus. Several groups, including ours, have started efforts to develop antivirals against it. But until recently, there hadn’t been any proven compounds that could target this gene and affect the virus, at least in cell culture.”

In the new paper, Fehr’s KU lab reports developing molecules that bind to the Mac1 protein and inhibit coronavirus replication in cell cultures derived from mice and human lung tissue. This work builds on recent experiments in the Fehr lab that produced the first molecules effective against Mac1.

“This paper is similar to our earlier work, though with a completely different set of inhibitors,” Fehr said. “But this study had some cool twists and turns. One key development was the discovery of our top compound — we called it ‘4B.’ It looked very promising in how it fit into the Mac1 binding pocket, and its IC50 — the amount of drug needed to reduce viral activity by half — was significantly lower than all of our other compounds, meaning it should be a better inhibitor.”

Yet when the group first tested 4B in antiviral assays, it didn’t actually work.

“It showed no effect,” Fehr said. “Based on its biochemical properties, we believe it wasn’t able to cross the cellular membrane. Cell membranes are greasy, hydrophobic barriers that keep things inside cells but also prevent certain molecules from entering — especially charged molecules, like those with acid or base groups attached. Compound 4B had a notable acid group, which likely prevented it from getting into cells.”

To address this, the group modified the compound to improve its ability to enter coronavirus-infected cells.

“We converted the acid into an ester, using a couple of different types of modifications,” Fehr said. “Once we did that, we started to see robust antiviral activity. This was the ‘aha!’ moment. We were finally able to make the compound cell-permeable and functional in cell culture. That was a big step — taking a molecule that had strong activity in vitro, modifying it and showing it could now work in cells against the actual virus.”

Fehr credited many of his collaborators for the breakthrough on Mac1 targets.

“I have to give credit to co-authors Dana Ferraris, chemistry professor at McDaniel College in Westminster, Maryland; Lari Lehtiö, a biochemistry professor at Oulu University in Finland; and KU core facility directors Anuradha Roy and David Johnson. Each of these individuals and their labs put a lot of work into this paper,” Fehr said. “And of course the majority of the credit goes to the first author, Jessica J. Pfannenstiel, a graduate student in the KU Department of Molecular Biosciences, as she produced almost all the antiviral data and identified the drug-resistant mutations.”

While coronaviruses can develop resistance to the experimental KU inhibitors, it does so at a “fitness cost” — meaning future generations with more resistance are otherwise weakened and don’t fare well in mice. This mechanism suggests these inhibitors, if further developed into an antiviral, could render coronavirus harmless.

For this to happen, Fehr said more work is needed to refine the promising molecules.

“Mouse models are important, and before we can test our inhibitors in mice we need to improve their potency and stability so that they will survive the harsh environment of a living organism,” he said. His group is continuing to work towards these goals.

The KU researcher gave credit to funding from the National Institutes of Health and KU’s Chemical Biology of Infectious Disease program, led by KU faculty member Scott Hefty, for the breakthroughs.

“This program has been crucial in supporting multiple groups working on inhibitors for viruses, parasites and bacteria,” Fehr said. “It provides core facilities and resources, like the high-throughput screening lab led by Anuradha Roy, that enable robust assay development and compound testing. These tools position us well to rapidly respond to potential future coronavirus outbreaks by identifying promising inhibitors. While drug development is a long process, KU is equipped to quickly and effectively begin the process of identifying novel antimicrobial compounds.”

Fehr said that beyond drug discovery, involvement in COBRE helps faculty gain expertise that improves their ability to evaluate national antimicrobial research, strengthening the broader scientific community.

“As a university, our primary role is to provide knowledge and develop leaders — faculty, students and postdocs — with expertise to advance infectious disease research nationwide,” Fehr said.

Other KU contributors include Daniel Cluff, undergraduate researcher; Nathaniel Schemmel, undergraduate researcher; Joseph O’Connor, graduate research assistant; Pradtahna Saenjamsai, graduate research assistant; Srivatsan Parthasarathy, postdoctoral researcher; Mei Feng, formulation scientist at the Biopharmaceutical Innovation and Optimization Center; and Michael Hageman, Valentino J. Stella Distinguished Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry.

Other collaborators include undergraduate researchers Lavinia Sherrill, Iain Colquhoun, Gabrielle Cadoux and Devyn Thorne of McDaniel College in Westminster, Maryland; and research scientists Men Thi Hoai Duong, and Johan Pääkkönen of Oulu University in Finland.