Wednesday, July 23, 2025

 

The most complete view of the human genome yet sets new standard for use in precision medicine



New research decodes the most elusive, difficult-to-sequence regions of the genome from populations around the world, rewriting knowledge of human biology and setting a new benchmark for precision medicine



Jackson Laboratory

Revealing The Hidden Genome 

video: 

Discover how hidden complexities of the human genome are revealed by scientists from The Jackson Laboratory. Technological advancements are now allowing us to assemble continuous genomes with unprecedented clarity. This breakthrough also enables scientists to identify and resolve complex rearrangements within the genome. In this JAX in Motion, learn how this new level of discovery could revolutionize healthcare and our understanding of human health.

 

 

view more 

Credit: The Jackson Laboratory





An international team of scientists has decoded some of the most stubborn, overlooked regions of the human genome using complete sequences from 65 individuals across diverse ancestries. The study, published online today in Nature and co-led by The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), reveals how hidden DNA variations that influence everything from digestion and immune response to muscle control—and could explain why certain diseases strike some populations harder than others.

This milestone builds on two foundational studies that reshaped the field of genomics. In 2022, researchers achieved the first-ever complete sequence of a single human genome, filling in major gaps left by the original Human Genome Project. In 2023, scientists released a draft pangenome constructed from 47 individuals—a critical step toward representing global genetic diversity. The new study significantly expands on both efforts, closing 92% of the remaining data gaps and mapping genomic variation across ancestries with a breadth and resolution never before achieved.

“For too long, our genetic references have excluded much of the world’s population,” said Christine Beck, a geneticist at JAX and the University of Connecticut Health Center who co-led the work. “This work captures essential variation that helps explain why disease risk isn’t the same for everyone. Our genomes are not static, and neither is our understanding of them.”

By decoding DNA segments once thought too complex or variable to analyze, the study sets a new gold standard for genome sequencing and propels the field toward a more complete and inclusive vision of human biology. The findings clear a critical path for advancing precision medicine and ensuring that future discoveries benefit all populations—not just those historically overrepresented in research.

Hiding within our DNA

Scientists decode DNA by reading the order of its building blocks, called nucleotides, which act like letters in an instruction manual to direct all body functions. Current technologies can read most of that text but often miss or misread long, complex, and highly repetitive segments that span millions of letters that influence how genes work. These long stretches are called structural variants, and they can increase disease risk, protect the body, or offer no apparent effect at all.  

Structural variants mainly arise when cells replicate and repair DNA, especially in sections with extremely long and repetitive sequences prone to errors. Unlike many other types of genetic variation, there are different types of structural variants, and they can span large regions of DNA. These structural variants include deletions, duplications, insertions, inversions, and translocations of genome segments. More complex variations, where large DNA chunks rearrange and fuse in unpredictable ways, were a primary focus of the new study.

Complex rearrangements of genomes can also drive evolutionary changes that shape our biology, like how the human brain became larger and more sophisticated over time. But mapping these changes contiguously is remarkably difficult because they scramble the genome in ways that defy decoding — like trying to make sense of pages from a book that’s been torn up, rearranged, and reassembled without seeing the original version.

“It's only been in the last three years that finally technology got to the point where we can sequence complete genomes,” said Charles Lee, the Robert Alvine Family Endowed Chair and a JAX geneticist who in 2004 discovered the widespread presence of structural DNA variation in people’s genomes. “Now, we've captured probably 95% or more of all these structural variants in each genome sequenced and analyzed. Having done this for not five, not 10, not 20—but 65 genomes—is an incredible feat.”

Turning on the light

Until now, geneticists could only chart the “easiest” of structural variations in our DNA, leaving in the dark not only the most tangled, repetitive regions, but also their connection to rare genetic diseases. The new research has now broken that logjam, untangling 1,852 previously intractable complex structural variants and sharing an open-source playbook that any scientists sequencing genomes to this level can use in their laboratories.

Resolving these previously “hidden” regions across a wide range of ancestries turns areas that were once genetic blind spots into valuable sources of insight.

The work completely resolved the Y chromosome from 30 male genomes, shedding light on a chromosome that has been particularly challenging to resolve due to its highly repetitive sequences, and which JAX scientists fully sequenced from telomere to telomere just 18 months ago. In addition, the team fully resolved an intricate region of human genomes associated with the immune system called the Major Histocompatibility Complex, which is linked to cancer, autoimmune syndromes, and more than 100 other diseases.  

The work also provides full sequences for the notoriously repetitive SMN1 and SMN2 region, the target of life-saving antisense therapies for spinal muscular atrophy, as well as a gene called NBPF8 involved in developmental and neurogenetic disease. The amylase gene cluster, which helps humans digest starchy foods according to a recent JAX study, was also fully sequenced.

The study additionally mapped transposable DNA elements in unprecedented detail, cataloguing 12,919 of these mobile element insertions across the 65 individuals. These elements, which can “jump” around the genome and change how genes work, accounted for almost 10% of all structural variants. In 1983, Barbara McClintock, a Hartford, Conn. native, received the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine for her discovery of similar “jumping genes”, also known as transposable elements, in corn. 

Some of these jumping genes in this study were even found in centromeres—regions of the chromosome that are essential for cell division and extremely difficult to sequence due to their repetitive DNA. Overall, the work accurately resolved and validated 1,246 human centromeres, shedding light on the extreme variability at their cores.

“With our health, anything that deals with susceptibility to diseases is a combination of what genes we have and the environment we’re interacting with,” Lee said. “If you don't have your complete genetic information, how are you going to get a complete picture of your health and your susceptibility to disease?”

The work was made possible by genome sequencing techniques that combine highly accurate medium-length DNA reads with longer, lower-accuracy ones. The interpretation of variation in the genomes was driven by software from JAX that accurately catalogues variants between two human sequences. This software has now pushed forward to identifying structural variation within the most complex regions of human DNA.

“Just because we have a long, complete sequence doesn’t mean we actually know what’s in it. It’s like having a really good book, but there are still some pages we can’t read, and these tools are finally allowing us to interpret those missing parts of the genome,” said Peter Audano, a JAX computational biologist in the Beck lab who developed and implemented the variant-finding software. “Now we can say, ‘Here’s a mutation, it starts here, ends there, and this is what it looks like.’ That’s a huge step forward. Now, scientists studying autism, rare diseases, and cancers will have the tools to see everything we've been missing for decades.”  

This work was conducted in collaboration with more than 20 institutions, including the University of Washington, the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heinrich Heine University, University of Pennsylvania, Clemson University, Yale University and the University of Colorado under the auspices of the Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium.

About The Jackson Laboratory

The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) is an independent, nonprofit biomedical research institution with a National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Center. JAX leverages a unique combination of research, education, and resources to achieve its bold mission: to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the global biomedical community in the shared quest to improve human health. Established in Bar Harbor, Maine in 1929, JAX is a global organization with nearly 3,000 employees worldwide and campuses and facilities in Maine, Connecticut, California, Florida, and Japan. For more information, please visit www.jax.org.

Telehealth and online cognitive behavioral therapy–based treatments for high-impact chronic pain



JAMA Network






About The Study: 

Remote, scalable cognitive behavioral therapy-based chronic pain treatments (delivered either via telehealth or self-completed modules online) resulted in modest improvements in pain and related functional/quality-of-life outcomes compared with usual care among individuals with high-impact chronic pain. These lower-resource cognitive behavioral therapy-based chronic pain treatments could improve availability of evidence-based nonpharmacologic pain treatments within health care systems. 


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Lynn DeBar, PhD, MPH, email lynn.debar@kpchr.org.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2025.11178)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2025.11178?guestAccessKey=f2267471-d70d-435c-b180-84edfd170f56&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=072325

 

Llama antibodies: New therapeutic avenues against schizophrenia




CNRS
Llama antibodies: new therapeutic avenues against schizophrenia 

image: 

Young llama born near the base camp at the beginning of the Ice Memory expedition in Bolivia.
 

view more 

Credit: © Bruno JOURDAIN / IGE / CNRS Images





While current treatments for schizophrenia — a mental illness affecting 1% of the world’s population — can reduce certain symptoms, they have little effect on the cognitive deficits affecting the daily life of patients.

Scientists at the Institute of Functional Genomics (CNRS/Inserm/Université de Montpellier) have just designed a nanobody made from llama antibodies that can specifically activate a glutamate receptor involved in regulating neural activity. Administered peripherally via veins or muscles, this new molecule has demonstrated its capacity to break the blood-brain barrier and effectively reach brain receptors.

The therapeutic effect of these nanobodies was evaluated in two preclinical models of schizophrenia. The administration of nanobodies corrected the cognitive deficits observed among mouse models, as the cognitive function of animals clearly improved beginning with the first injection, with a prolonged effect over one week.

Clinical studies are now required to demonstrate that this ability to correct cognitive deficits via peripheral injection can represent a new avenue of treatment for schizophrenia. This research confirms the potential of nanobodies as a new therapeutic strategy for acting on the brain, with their use eventually being broadened to include the treatment of other neurological illnesses.

Notes :

  1. Natural structure that protects the brain by filtering the substances present in blood. It prevents most molecules from penetrating brain cells, which makes it difficult to administer treatments targeting those cells.
  2. Working at the Institute of Functional Genomics (CNRS/Inserm/Univ Montpellier) and the Cancer Research Centre of Marseille (Aix-Marseille Université/CNRS/Inserm/Institut Paoli-Calmettes).

 

The Evolution of escape



Study shows how evolution sent deer mice scurrying down two different paths to evade aerial predators




Harvard University


For a mouse, survival often boils down to one urgent question: flee or freeze?

But the best strategy to avoid being snatched and eaten depends on which mouse you are asking. According to a new study by Harvard biologists, two closely-related species of deer mice have evolved very different responses to aerial predators thanks to tweaks in brain circuitry. One species that dwells in densely-vegetated areas instinctively darts for cover while a cousin living in open areas goes still to avoid being spotted.

“In this case, we were able to pinpoint where evolution acted to make species from different environments have different behaviors to the same stimulus," said Felix Baier, who conducted the study in Hopi Hoekstra’s lab in the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology as a PhD student in the Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. Now postdoctoral fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Baier added: “The paper shows that evolution can act anywhere, including in more central brain regions.”

The findings [link will activate when embargo ends], published in the journal Nature, provide new insights about a group of animals that have become iconic examples of evolutionary adaptation.

Deer mice of the genus Peromyscus include more than 50 species occupying virtually every habitat from desert to mountains and they are the most abundant mammals in North America. They are prime examples of an adaptive radiation—the process by which an evolutionary lineage rapidly diversifies into multiple species, each occupying specialized ecological niches. Because they have been intensely studied in the wild and in the lab, deer mice are sometimes called the fruit flies of mammal biology.

In the rodent family tree, deer mice separated from the ancestors of house mice and rats about 25 million years ago. By some accounts, Mickey Mouse was inspired by the Peromyscus field mice that scurried through the animation studio of Walt Disney.

The lab of evolutionary biologist Hoekstra (who serves as the Edgerley Family Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences) has spent decades studying how different species of deer mice have adapted their biology and behavior. In previous studies, the Hoekstra lab showed how species evolved specializations such as fur colors, mating habits, and burrowing behaviors.

In this new study, the team sought to understand why two sister species respond very differently to predators. Because deer mice are frequently hunted by hawks and owls, their escape behaviors are shaped by intense natural selection. Said Hoekstra: “It’s life or death!”

The species Peromyscus maniculatus—which lives in densely-vegetated prairies and is the most widespread of all deer mice—is quick to dash for cover after sensing the approach of a bird of prey. In contrast, the oldfield mouse Peromyscus polionotus—which lives in open areas such as sand dunes or bare farm fields—tends to freeze in place.

To better understand these differences, the investigators placed the deer mice in an enclosure furnished with a small shelter. They mounted a computer screen atop the cage and showed images of small dark dots floating on a light screen (which simulated birds soaring high overhead) and dots that suddenly loomed larger (which mimicked predatory birds diving in for the kill). When they sensed the looming threat of an approaching bird, the prairie deer mice scrambled for shelter but the open field mice froze in place.

The investigators sought to uncover the neural basis for these differences. They played a frightening sound and triggered similar reactions, revealing that the difference was not just vision or other peripheral senses, but some kind of central processing in the brain.

Next they conducted immunohistochemical and electrophysiological studies of the mice brains and located the key junction--a portion of the brain called the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG). Activation of this region was about 1.5 times higher in the species that escaped.

With a technique known as optogenetics, the scientists introduced proteins that act as light-sensitive ion channels into the dPAG of both species and then stimulated the neurons with lasers. This stimulation triggered the same responses they had witnessed in the earlier experiments—even when no images were shown. In another experiment, they suppressed activity in the same region and induced one species to behave just like the other.

The study was conducted in collaboration with colleagues at KU Leuven, a research university in Belgium.

Previous studies by the Hoekstra lab have documented other differences between the same two species such as mating (P. polionotus is monogamous while P. maniculatus is promiscuous) and burrowing (P. polionotus makes long complex tunnels while P. maniculatus makes short, simple ones). The new study adds yet another example of how evolution has tailored each species to its unique environment since the two lineages separated between 1 million and 2 million years ago.

The authors theorize that the different escape responses evolved to maximize chances of survival in their respective habitats. Deer mice that live in vegetated areas usually can find cover nearby so they flee, but those that live on open ground have fewer places to hide and only attract attention by running. “You rely on your camouflage,” explained Baier. “There’s a fair chance that when you freeze, you get overlooked.”

But no species would survive if it never escaped. The scientists found that the open field mice eventually could be induced to flee, but they required twice the amount of threat.

Both species share the same basic neural machinery, but evolution apparently has adjusted the knobs to fine tune each species for its ecology. Hoekstra said those findings echoed a common theme in evolutionary biology: “Natural selection often tweaks existing neural circuits rather than constructing entirely new pathways,” she said.

 

Newly discovered ‘sixth sense’ links gut microbes to the brain in real time



Inside a Duke University School of Medicine discovery of a direct line between the microbiome and the brain that offers new insight into behavior and appetite



Duke University






by Shantell Kirkendoll

In a breakthrough that reimagines the way the gut and brain communicate, researchers have uncovered what they call a “neurobiotic sense,” a newly identified system that lets the brain respond in real time to signals from microbes living in our gut.

The new research, led by Duke University School of Medicine neuroscientists Diego Bohórquez, PhD, and M. Maya Kaelberer, PhD, and published in Nature, centers on neuropods, tiny sensor cells lining the colon’s epithelium. These cells detect a common microbial protein and send rapid messages to the brain that help curb appetite.

But this is just the beginning. The team believes this neurobiotic sense may be a broader platform for understanding how gut detects microbes, influencing everything from eating habits to mood — and even how the brain might shape the microbiome in return. 

“We were curious whether the body could sense microbial patterns in real time and not just as an immune or inflammatory response, but as a neural response that guides behavior in real time,” said Bohórquez, a professor of medicine and neurobiology at Duke University School of Medicine and senior author of the study.  

The key player is flagellin, an ancient protein found in bacterial flagella, a tail-like structure that bacteria use to swim. When we eat, some gut bacteria release flagellin. Neuropods detect it, with help from a receptor called TLR5, and fire off a message through the vagus nerve – a major communication line of communication between the gut and the brain.  

The team, supported by the National Institutes of Health, proposed a bold idea: that bacterial flagellin in the colon could trigger neuropods to send an appetite-suppressing signal to the brain — a direct microbial influence on behavior.

The researchers tested this by fasting mice overnight, then giving them a small dose of flagellin directly to the colon. Those mice ate less.  

When researchers tried the same experiment in mice missing the TLR5 receptor, nothing changed. The mice kept eating and gained weight, a clue that the pathway helps regulate appetite. The findings suggest that flagellin sends a “we’ve had enough” signal through TLR5, allowing the gut to tell the brain it’s time to stop eating. Without that receptor, the message doesn’t get through.

The discovery was guided by lead study authors Winston Liu, MD, PhD, Emily Alway, both graduate students of the Medical Scientist Training Program, and postdoctoral fellow Naama Reicher, Ph.D. Their experiments reveal that disrupting the pathway altered eating habits in mice pointed to a deeper link between gut microbes and behavior.

“Looking ahead, I think this work will be especially helpful for the broader scientific community to explain how our behavior is influenced by microbes,” said Bohórquez. “One clear next step is to investigate how specific diets change the microbial landscape in the gut. That could be a key piece of the puzzle in conditions like obesity or psychiatric disorders.”

Citation: “A gut sense for a microbial pattern regulates feeding,” Winston W. Liu et al., Nature, 23 July 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09301-7