Thursday, July 24, 2025

 

New research supports Ivermectin as an effective strategy to control malaria transmission



The BOHEMIA trial in Kenya showed a 26% reduction in new malaria infections among children aged 5-15



Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)

Ivermectin tablets 

image: 

Ivermectin tablets used for the BOHEMIA trial in Kenya

view more 

Credit: Life Spark Studios/BOHEMIA project





Ivermectin administered to the whole population significantly reduces malaria transmission, offering new hope in the fight against the disease. The BOHEMIA trial, the largest study on ivermectin for malaria to date, showed a 26% reduction in new malaria infection on top of existing bed nets, providing strong evidence of ivermectin’s potential as a complementary tool in malaria control. The results of this project, coordinated by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) -an institution supported by the “la Caixa” Foundation- in collaboration with the Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM) and the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, have been published in The New England Journal of Medicine.    

Malaria remains a global health challenge, with 263 million cases and 597,000 deaths reported in 2023. Current vector control methods, such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), have become less effective due to insecticide resistance and behavioural adaptations in mosquitoes to bite outdoors and during dusk or dawn, when people are not protected by these measures. This underscores the urgent need for innovative solutions to combat malaria.

Ivermectin for malaria: A novel strategy

Ivermectin, a drug traditionally used to treat neglected tropical diseases like onchocerciasis, which causes river blindness, and lymphatic filariasis, which causes elephantiasis, has been shown to reduce malaria transmission by killing the mosquitoes that feed on treated individuals. Given the rising resistance to conventional insecticides, ivermectin could offer an effective new approach to tackle malaria transmission, especially in regions where traditional methods have become less effective.

The Unitaid-funded BOHEMIA project (Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa) conducted two Mass Drug Administration (MDA) trials in the high-burden malaria regions: Kwale County (Kenya) and Mopeia district (Mozambique). The trials assessed the safety and efficacy of a single monthly dose of ivermectin (400 mcg/kg) given for three consecutive months at the start of the rainy season in reducing malaria transmission. In Kenya, the intervention targeted children aged 5–15, while in Mozambique it focused on children under five.

Malaria reduction in Kenya

In Kwale County, Kenya, children who received ivermectin experienced a 26% reduction in malaria infection incidence compared to those who received albendazole, the control drug used in the study. The trial involved over 20,000 participants and more than 56,000 treatments, demonstrating that ivermectin significantly reduced malaria infection rates—particularly among children living further from cluster borders or in areas where drug distribution was more efficient. Moreover, the safety profile of ivermectin was favourable, with no severe drug-related adverse events and only mild, transient side effects already seen with ivermectin in campaigns against neglected tropical diseases.

“We are thrilled with these results”, says Carlos Chaccour, co-principal investigator of the BOHEMIA project and ISGlobal researcher at the time of the study. “Ivermectin has shown great promise in reducing malaria transmission and could complement existing control measures. With continued research, ivermectin MDA could become an effective tool for malaria control and even contribute to elimination efforts,” Chaccour, who is now a researcher at the Navarra Centre for International Development at the University of Navarra, adds. 

“These results align with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) criteria for new vector control tools”, states Joseph Mwangangi, from the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme. “The findings suggest that ivermectin MDA could be a valuable complementary strategy for malaria control, particularly in areas where mosquito resistance to insecticides is a growing concern”, adds Marta Maia, BOHEMIA’s lead entomologist from the University of Oxford.

Lessons from the Mozambique trial

In contrast, the implementation of the Mozambique trial in the rural district of Mopeia faced severe disruptions due to Cyclone Gombe (2022) and a subsequent cholera outbreak, which significantly disrupted operations. “One of the most important lessons we learned from the trial in Mopeia is that strong community engagement is essential,” states Francisco Saúte, director of the Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM). “Building trust with local communities and fostering close collaboration with the Health Ministry, National Malaria Control Program, and local authorities was key to ensuring acceptance of the ivermectin MDA.”

Expanding the Impact Beyond Malaria

In addition to reducing malaria transmission, ivermectin MDA offers significant collateral benefits. The BOHEMIA team found an important reduction in the prevalence of skin infestations such as scabies and head lice in the ivermectin group in Mozambique, and the community reported a major reduction in bed bugs in Kenya. These effects are particularly valuable when ivermectin is integrated into existing delivery systems, maximising its impact on public health.

Shaping the future of malaria prevention

The study is part of a larger global effort to assess ivermectin’s potential in malaria control. The findings have been reviewed by the WHO vector control advisory group, which concluded that the study had demonstrated impact and recommended further studies. Findings were also shared with national health authorities as they evaluate the potential inclusion of ivermectin in malaria control programmes.

“This research has the potential to shape the future of malaria prevention, particularly in endemic areas where existing tools are failing”, concludes Regina Rabinovich, BOHEMIA PI and Director of ISGlobal’s Malaria Elimination Initiative. “With its novel mechanism of action and proven safety profile, ivermectin could offer a new approach using a well-known, safe drug that can add to the effect of other mosquito control tools available today.”

 

Can Amazon Alexa or Google Home help detect Parkinson’s?



A quick, speech-based AI tool offers a new way to screen for a key indicator of the neurodegenerative disease.



University of Rochester





Computer scientists at the University of Rochester have developed an AI-powered, speech-based screening tool that can help people assess whether they are showing signs of Parkinson’s disease, the fastest growing neurological disability in the world. A study published in the journal npj Parkinson’s Disease introduces a web-based screening test that asks users to recite two pangrams—short sentences using all 26 letters of the alphabet. Within seconds, the AI analyzes the voice recordings for subtle patterns linked to Parkinson’s, with nearly 86 percent accuracy.

Parkinson’s disease is typically diagnosed by movement disorder specialists—neurologists with specific training to evaluate complex motor symptoms—using a combination of family history, neurological examinations, and brain imaging. While the study’s authors emphasize that their AI-based tool is not a substitute for a clinical diagnosis, they see it as a fast, low-barrier, and accessible way to flag people, especially in remote areas, who might be living with the condition and encourage them to seek more thorough clinical evaluations.

“There are huge swaths of the US and across the globe where access to specialized neurological care is limited,” says Ehsan Hoque, a professor in Rochester’s Department of Computer Science and co-director of the Rochester Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory. “With users’ consent, widely used speech-based interfaces like Amazon Alexa or Google Home could potentially help people identify if they need to seek further care.”

To train and validate the tool, the researchers collected data from more than 1,300 participants—with and without Parkinson’s—across diverse environments, including home settings, clinical visits at the University of Rochester Medical Center, and the InMotion Parkinson’s disease care center in Ohio.

Using the computer’s microphone, users simply read aloud two sentences: “The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog wakes up and follows the fox into the forest, but again the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.” By leveraging the power of advanced semi-supervised speech models trained on millions of digital audio recordings to understand the characteristics of speech, the tool can glean enough vocal cues from those two short sentences to flag warning signs.

“These large audio models are trained to understand how speech works; for example, the way someone with Parkinson’s would utter sounds, pause, breathe, and inadvertently add features of unintelligibility is different in someone without Parkinson’s,” says Abdelrahman Abdelkader, a computer science master’s degree student in Hoque’s lab and one of the two lead authors of the study. “If a person is saying the pangram that contains the full spectrum of the alphabetical variability and trails off at certain points, the model can tell if that’s different from the typical representation and flag it.”

The tool was 85.7 percent accurate when tested, providing a strong indication of whether someone may have Parkinson’s. But it is a multifaceted disease, and while some people demonstrate symptoms through speech, they can also display signs through motor tasks or facial expressions. Over the last decade, Hoque’s lab has pursued clever algorithms to combine multiple indicators and produced state-of-the-art results.

“Research shows that nearly 89 percent of people with Parkinson’s have a deformity in their voice that can be indicative of the disease, making speech a strong starting point for digital screening,” says Tariq Adnan, a computer science PhD student affiliated with Hoque’s lab and another lead author of the study. “By combining this method with assessments of other symptoms, we aim to cover the majority of people through our accessible screening process.”

An interactive demo of the lab’s three screening tests, including the speech test outlined in the paper, is available online.

The other authors of the paper include PhD students Md. Saiful Islam, who co-supervised the work with Hoque, Zipei Liu, Ekram Hossain, and Sooyong Park.

The study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, a Google Faculty Research Award, and a Google PhD Fellowship.

 

New research reveals scars of Gambia’s witch hunts



UN-backed study shows lasting damage caused by state-led witchcraft accusations



Anglia Ruskin University





A new United Nations-funded study has highlighted the lasting psychological and social scars left by a state-sponsored witch hunt in The Gambia, more than a decade after it was carried out by former President Yahya Jammeh.

The research, led by Professor Mick Finlay of Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) in collaboration with the University of The Gambia and Nottingham Trent University, is the first academic study into the stigma associated with government-led witchcraft accusations, and includes interviews with victims and their families from the villages most affected by the campaign.

Jammeh’s 22-year dictatorship, which ended in 2016, was marked by human rights abuses including torture, extrajudicial killings and disappearances. Between 2008-2009, he orchestrated a campaign of witch hunts focusing on the West Coast and North Bank regions. These were led by a group of “witch hunters” from neighbouring countries, supported by The Gambia’s security forces.

Hundreds of people, mainly elderly, were detained, beaten, raped and subjected to degrading treatment. It is thought 41 people died and the survivors faced social exclusion and discrimination when they returned home because of the stigma associated with the witchcraft accusations.

The new study, published in the Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology and funded by the United Nations Development Program (The Gambia), involved interviewing and surveying the victims and their families, as well as members of their communities.

There was widespread sympathy for those affected – 98% of survey respondents expressed compassion for victims and their families – and a high level of agreement that the government (99%) and the community (92%) should provide more help for victims, indicating that the effects of the witch hunts were still being experienced.

The study also highlighted the complex role of traditional beliefs in perpetuating stigma. Although most participants believed the witch hunts were organised to frighten people not to oppose President Jammeh (89%) or to sow division (87%), 25% believed the threat from witches was real, including 22% of victims and the families of victims surveyed.

However, there was overwhelming support for legal reform. Almost all participants agreed that accusations of witchcraft should be made illegal (98%), and those responsible should be punished (95%).

Through interviews, the researchers found that the stigma extended beyond individuals to their families and entire villages. Children of victims were bullied at school, families were shunned, and some communities were labelled as “witch villages” by neighbouring areas. This led to broken relationships, mistrust and long-lasting divisions within and between communities.

Victims reported a range of psychological conditions including anxiety, panic attacks and post-traumatic symptoms. Many described feeling powerless and socially isolated. Some withdrew from public life entirely, while others struggled to find work.

Although The Gambia’s current government established a Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) to investigate the human rights abuses carried out by Jammeh, the study found many victims felt more needed to be done to address the specific harms caused by the witch hunts.

Participants proposed a range of measures to support reconciliation and healing including public declarations of innocence, legal reforms to criminalise witchcraft accusations, counselling, educational support, financial reparations and community-led dialogues to restore victims’ reputations.

Mick Finlay, the lead author of the study and Professor of Social and Applied Psychology at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), said: “Our extensive fieldwork showed that not only did victims of the witchcraft accusations have to deal with the trauma of the human rights abuses, they also experienced a range of longer-term stigmatising effects from sections of their communities.

“There was a strong desire among those we spoke to for official recognition of the injustice they suffered. Addressing the stigma of Jammeh’s witch hunts involves restoring the good name of the victims through official declarations as well as rebuilding their social roles and relationships.

“Although The Gambia is undergoing transitional justice processes to address the impacts of the dictatorship, the recommendations by the participants should help the government and NGOs to further develop reparation and reconciliation processes related to the specific case of state-sanctioned witch hunts.

“Our findings will be of interest to other countries going through transitional justice processes when human rights come into conflict with traditional beliefs, especially belief in witchcraft.”

The open access study also involved the Women's Association of Victims' Empowerment (WAVE) charity in The Gambia and is published by the Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology.

 

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

 

Study shows a need for vigilance when observing long COVID symptoms in younger children



Rutgers researchers say clinicians and caregivers may not recognize the symptoms because they are unfamiliar with it



Rutgers University





Infants, toddlers and preschoolers exhibit symptoms of long COVID, but the symptoms can be different and more difficult to identify in these children, according to Rutgers Health research.   

The new study is part of the National Institutes of Health–funded Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) initiative and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics

Lawrence Kleinman, a professor and vice chair of the Department of Pediatrics at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and a professor of global public health at Rutgers School of Public Health, is the lead investigator for the Collaborative Long-term study of Outcomes of COVID-19 in Kids (CLOCK), a national consortium led by Rutgers.

“The COVID pandemic began with a myth – that children are spared its ill effects. In contrast, many children were sick with COVID, and we now have a new chronic illness emerging,” Kleinman said. “We are working hard to characterize long COVID in children and it will be critical for policymakers to assure that we have adequate resources to support and manage these children now and in the future.”

Of the total 1,011 children included in the study, 472 were infants and toddlers (children 2 years old or younger) and 539 were preschoolers (children 3 to 5 years old). Overall, 101 (15%) of the 677 children with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified as likely having long COVID. The symptoms of long COVID in these age groups differ from those reported among school age children and teens. Infants and toddlers with long COVID were more likely to experience difficulty sleeping, fussiness, poor appetite, stuffy nose and coughing while preschoolers were more likely to experience coughing and daytime tiredness and low energy.

Researchers said they can confirm that younger children can have long COVID. Clinicians and caregivers may not recognize long COVID in these children because they are unfamiliar with it. The authors explain too that the inability of younger children to describe how they feel may make identification of long COVID more difficult in this age group. For similar reasons it is important for pediatricians and family physicians to consider long COVID when children present with the symptoms described. The failure to diagnose long COVID quickly delays treatment and inhibits availability of supportive services to children with long COVID.

“This study is the largest systematic look at long COVID in younger children in the United States,” said Sunanda Gaur, a professor of pediatrics and director of the Adult and Pediatric Clinical Research Centers at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital. “It suggests that this is an illness that children, families, pediatricians and the health care and educational system will be dealing with for a generation.”

+++

About RECOVER: The National Institutes of Health Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (NIH RECOVER) Initiative is a $1.15 billion effort, which is supported in part through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. It seeks to identify how people recuperate from COVID-19 and who is at risk for developing post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC). Researchers also are working with patients, clinicians and communities across the United States to identify strategies to prevent and treat the long-term effects of COVID, including long COVID. For more information, please visit recovercovid.org.   

 

Long COVID Pediatric Awareness Week is July 21 to July 25, 2025, and is hosted by Long COVID Families.org.

 


Utah engineers develop novel material that efficiently removes ‘forever chemicals’



This metal-organic framework both fluoresces in the presence of certain PFAS chemicals and absorbs these environmental contaminants that are widely used in consumer products.



University of Utah

Ling Zang 

image: 

Ling Zang, left, and Rana Dalapati, seated, modified another chemical-capturing molecule to increase its binding ability.

view more 

Credit: University of Utah College of Engineering






University of Utah researchers have developed a material that addresses an urgent environmental challenges: the efficient removal and real-time detection of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a toxic and persistent member of the PFAS “forever chemicals” family, from contaminated water.

In an industry-funded study published in the Journal of Materials Chemistry CLing Zang, professor in the John and Marcia Price College of Engineering’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and his research team introduced a dual-functional metal-organic framework (MOF) known as UiO-66-N(CH₃)₃⁺, a zirconium-based material known for its thermal and chemical stability.

This new MOF demonstrates exceptional capabilities in both PFOA adsorption and fluorescence-based detection; the MOF literally lights up when it binds to the pollutant, making it easier to quantify the scale of the problem and the rate and efficiency of remediation. The MOF also exhibits excellent reusability, as tested through repeated adsorption–desorption cycles. After each adsorption, the material could be readily regenerated by simple washing.

“This MOF represents a major leap forward for PFAS remediation,” said Rana Dalapati, the study’s lead author and postdoctoral researcher in the Zang Research Group.  “Its ability to both selectively capture and sensitively detect PFOA in real time makes it a versatile and practical solution for water treatment and environmental monitoring.”

This work builds on past research from the Zang lab that created a porous material that fluoresces in the presence of PFAS.

A prominent subset of this group of fluorine-based compounds, PFOA is a synthetic chemical with water and stain-resistant properties and has commonly been used in non-stick cookware, firefighting foam and other products. The material, which does not break down in the environment, has leached into groundwater, raising public health concerns.

Detecting and mitigating PFOA and other PFAS contamination has become a priority for many environmental quality agencies, and Zang’s breakthroughs could help.

UiO-66-N(CH₃)₃⁺ features fluorescent tags that turn on once PFOA is captured inside the MOF’s molecular cage.

Zang’s team constructed their MOF by modifying another widely studied metal-organic framework, known as UiO-66-NH₂, a material recognized for its high porosity and potential in water treatment applications. However, when applied to removal of PFOA, the adsorption capacity of UiO-66-NH₂ is limited due to weak binding interactions. To address this limitation, the researchers incorporated quaternary ammonium groups that enhance electrostatic interactions with PFOA, resulting in a 3.4-fold increase in adsorption capacity compared to the parent UiO-66-NH₂ framework. These cationic groups also work synergistically with the MOF’s metal-binding sites, achieving high selectivity and efficiency in contaminant capture.

The success of this approach underscores the power of post-synthetic modification in MOF design, opening the door to the development of next-generation multifunctional materials with tailored performance for specific environmental contaminants.

Key technological breakthroughs

  • Record-High Adsorption Capacity
    UiO-66-N(CH₃)₃⁺ achieves a maximum PFOA adsorption capacity of 1178 mg/g, as determined by Langmuir isotherm modeling, far surpassing conventional sorbents such as activated carbon and unmodified MOFs. This sets a new benchmark for PFOA uptake in the field.
  • Ultra-Fast Removal Performance
    Thanks to its highly porous, interconnected structure, the MOF removes nearly 100% of PFOA from 50 ppb aqueous solutions within 5 minutes. This sort of rapid treatment is crucial for real-world applications.
  • High Selectivity and Salt Tolerance
    The MOF exhibits strong selectivity for PFOA even in the presence of other PFAS compounds, salts, and natural organic matter, ensuring reliable performance in complex environmental conditions.
  • Robust Reusability
    The material maintains over 93% adsorption capacity after five regeneration cycles, making it both cost-effective and environmentally sustainable.
  • Integrated Fluorescent Sensing for Real-Time Monitoring
    Beyond removal, UiO-66-N(CH₃)₃⁺ functions as a highly sensitive “turn-on” fluorescent sensor for PFOA using an indicator displacement assay (IDA). This enables real-time, on-site quantification of PFOA concentrations, offering a user-friendly and rapid alternative to traditional lab-based techniques.

The study, titled “Dual-Functional Metal-Organic Framework for Efficient Removal and Fluorescent Detection of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) from Water,” was published July 15 in the Journal of Materials Chemistry C. The research was funded by Gentex Corporation, a Michigan-based technology company on whose board Zang sits.

Exclusive: BYD to delay mass production at new Hungarian plant, make fewer EVs, sources say

CHINA'S BACKDOOR INTO EUROPE

Reuters
Tue, July 22, 2025 at 

(Reuters) -China's BYD (1211.HK, BYDDF, BYDDY) will delay mass production at its new electric vehicle factory in Hungary until 2026 and will run the plant at below capacity for at least the first two years, two sources familiar with the matter said.

At the same time, China's No. 1 automaker will start making cars earlier than expected at a new plant in Turkey where labour costs are lower, and will vastly exceed its announced production plans, one of the sources said.

Shifting production away from Hungary in favour of Turkey would be a setback for the European Union, which has been hoping that its tariffs on EVs made in China would bring in Chinese investments and well-paid manufacturing jobs.

BYD's 4 billion euro ($4.64 billion) plant in Szeged, in southern Hungary, will start mass production in 2026 but only make a few tens of thousands of vehicles over the whole year, the sources said.

That would be a fraction of the plant's initial production capacity of 150,000 vehicles BYD. It should eventually have a maximum capacity of 300,000 cars per year.

A third source confirmed the slower 2026 start-up.

BYD has said it will launch operations at Szeged in October, but has not said publicly when mass production will start. Production at Szeged is due to increase in 2027, but will still be below planned capacity, the sources said.

Meanwhile, the automaker's $1 billion plant in Turkey, which had been slated to start production at the end of 2026 with an annual capacity of 150,000 cars, will make more cars than the Hungarian plant next year, one of the sources said.

Production at the plant in Manisa, western Turkey, will far exceed 150,000 cars in 2027 and BYD will greatly increase output again in 2028, the source added.

BYD did not respond to requests for comment.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to discuss BYD's production plans publicly.

BYD is building the plant in Hungary to sell cars in Europe tariff free. All the cars it currently sells in Europe are made in China, and subject to EU anti-subsidy tariffs on Chinese-made EV imports on top of the standard 10% duty. In BYD's case, the total tariff is 27%.

Many of the cars made at the new plant in Turkey will also be destined for Europe and face no tariffs when exported to the European Union.

A shift toward cheaper production in Turkey would highlight the challenge for Chinese carmakers that want to build cars in Europe to avoid punitive tariffs, but balk at the region's higher wages and energy costs.

Under right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Hungary, which will be the headquarters for BYD's European operations, has become an important trade and investment partner for China.

Turkey has long served as a low-cost manufacturing hub for major automakers including Toyota, Stellantis, Ford, Hyundai and Renault.

In March, the Turkish government said China's Chery will invest $1 billion in a plant with an annual production capacity of 200,000 vehicles.
Soaring demand

BYD is expanding rapidly outside its home market China, where it faces a vicious price war. Reuters reported last month BYD has slowed its expansion in China by reducing shifts at some factories and delaying adding new production lines.

The change in production plans comes as BYD overhauls its European operations following strategic missteps that included failing to sign up enough dealers and hire executives with local-market knowledge, and offering hybrids in markets resistant to fully-electric cars.

Demand for BYD's EVs, which are cheaper than European rivals' models, is soaring in the region.

S&P Global Mobility has estimated the No.1 Chinese automaker will sell 186,000 vehicles in Europe this year, up from 83,000 units in 2024, and expects sales to double again to just under 400,000 units by 2029.

BYD has begun ramping up operations at its plant in Brazil, but has also been sued by Brazilian prosecutors over alleged labour abuses involving Chinese contractors hired to build the complex.

In Hungary, the automaker had planned to install production line machinery by September at the Szeged plant, first announced in 2023, the two sources said.

A worker polishes the surface of a BYD car during the Shanghai auto show on Wednesday, April 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan) · ASSOCIATED PRESS

But in recent months it has delayed tooling of the production line, which is being built in one of its manufacturing hubs in China, the sources added.

BYD's plans for Szeged may change. Over the last year, executives have mentioned the possibility of making a number of different models at the plant, including the Atto 2, Atto 3 and Dolphin.


One source told Reuters BYD will make the popular Atto 3 and Dolphin EVs as well as its upcoming low-cost Seagull model there, while another source said it would make the Atto 2, Atto 3 and Dolphin.

In Turkey, one source said BYD will make the fully-electric Seal U SUV, the Sealion 5 - though it was unclear whether it would be the fully-electric or plug-in hybrid version - plus two plug-in hybrid models, the Seal U Dmi and Seal 06 Dm-i.

($1 = 0.8627 euros)

(Reporting By Reuters Staff; Writing by Nick Carey;Editing by Josephine Mason and Susan Fenton)
White House trots out Tulsi Gabbard to push narrative Obama led Russian interference claims and ‘coup’ against Trump

John Bowden
Wed, July 23, 2025 
THE INDEPENDENT


White House trots out Tulsi Gabbard to push narrative Obama led Russian interference claims and ‘coup’ against Trump

Donald Trump’s intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard took over the White House briefing room Wednesday to continue pressing her narrative about a “coup” supposedly launched by Barack Obama.

The latest conspiracy has been pressed by both Gabbard and President Donald Trump since the weekend as the administration returns to the “Russiagate” investigation as an apparent diversion while Trump is facing uproar from his base over his administration’s efforts to tamp down on speculation surrounding the death and crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedophile.

In early July, the Department of Justice and FBI declared in a joint statement that no “client list” detailing Epstein’s co-conspirators could be found within the DOJ’s files; the statement also reiterated the agencies’ conclusion that Epstein died by suicide in 2019.

On Wednesday, the president’s weeks-long effort to find a distraction to turn his base’s focus from that statement resulted in the director of the U.S. intelligence community declaring behind the White House podium that former President Obama ordered intelligence assessments to be doctored to include the assertion that Russia was working directly to elect Trump.

Gabbard called the investigation into Trump’s 2016 campaign a years-long “coup” orchestrated by the former president, something that Obama dismissively rejected in a rare statement this week condemning the Trump administration’s latest claims.

“There is irrefutable evidence that detailed how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,” Gabbard told reporters.

“They manufactured findings from shoddy sources, they suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional trade craft intelligence community standards, and withheld the truth from the American people,” she said.

“In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people,” she continued, later asserting that the supposedly serious changes to ODNI assessments (which in reality do not show a difference in conclusion) amounted to “a years long coup against the incoming president United States, Donald Trump.”

Gabbard’s report, released last week, closely followed an article from the Wall Street Journal purporting to contain a note from Trump to Epstein as part of the latter’s 50th birthday celebration in 2003.

The note, framed as an imagined dialogue between the two men, alludes to a shared “secret” between the two. The U.S. president strongly denied the note’s authenticity and swiftly filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the WSJ, it’s parent company News Corp and founder Rupert Murdoch, among others.

With the Jeffrey Epstein saga consuming more and more of the media atmosphere every day, the White House turned late last week to Barack Obama and the FBI investigation into his first campaign for the presidency as Trump’s aides seek to move the news cycle along.

The memo authored by Gabbard last week, which she summarized on Tuesday, accuses the Obama administration of lying to the American public about Russia’s supposed interest in seeing Trump elected. In reality, straight-news coverage of the 2016 election largely centered around the reality, verified by both the FBI’s special counsel investigation headed up by Robert Mueller and a bipartisan probe conducted by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Russian-backed hackers struck the servers of the Democratic National Committee in 2016, then published those materials online in an effort to damage the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. Russian influence campaigns on social media spanned a wide range of efforts including backing Trump, opposing Clinton, and disseminating misinformation.

Gabbard’s memo also mischaracterized the general assessment of the American intelligence community in 2016: that Russian intelligence agents had not attemped to directly influence vote totals through the hacking of election infrastructure, a finding which her office seemed to conflate with an absence of any Russian influence efforts altogether.


Former President Barack Obama has released a rare statement on 'Russia-gate' after President Donald Trump accused him of committing 'treason.' (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

On Wednesday, the director of national intelligence backed away from that conflation entirely.

She and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that it was the Trump administration’s view that Russian actors had interfered in the 2016 election through the use of social media botnets and other means to sow “distrust and chaos”, but without any clear goal or motive.

There was no explanation to what end Russia was supposedly sowing “distrust and chaos”, by hacking the servers of one major political party and not the other, if not with the aim of benefiting the party not forced to explain damaging internal emails which fueled accusations from Clinton’s critics in the party that the DNC establishment favored her.

Gabbard also dodged questions about what steps the Trump administration would take from here, or why the president and his allies had waited until statutes of limitations had likely expired on any criminal charges that could rise from the matter (were Trump’s allegations of misconduct actually true).

She referred questions about possible criminal charges to the Department of Justice and Attorney General Pam Bondi, whose own future in the administration is already on possibly shaky ground as the criticism of her declaration about the Epstein case continues to fester.

Neither she nor Leavitt could explain why the Senate Intelligence Committee (including now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio) did not find that the Obama administration had improperly changed any ODNI assessments in its report released in 2020.

Justice Department officials have been notably quiet amid the clamoring from the White House for retribution against Obama and top members of his administration, including Clinton, his director of national intelligence James Clapper, and FBI director James Comey. Bondi has announced no plans to launch a new investigation into the matter, and Gabbard herself can only refer evidence to the DOJ for review.

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives is leaving town early this week to dodge a vote on a bipartisan resolution that would force the administration to release the Epstein files, and Trump is increasingly swinging at longer and longer lists of his perceived foes as the pressure from his base ramps up and accusations of a cover-up grow louder.

In a now-deleted Truth Social post, Trump even bashed his supporters who support calls to investigate Epstein’s accomplices “weak” and claimed he didn’t need their support.