Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Turkey: a mass movement builds against Erdogan’s power grab

Monday 24 March 2025, by Antoine LarracheUraz Aydin


Uraz Aydin answers questions from Antoine Larrache about the mobilization currently building in Turkey after the arrest of the mayor of Istanbul, who is seen as Erdogan’s main rival in the race for the next presidential election.


Can you tell us about the arrest of the mayor of Istanbul?

On the morning of March 19, Ekrem Imamoğlu, the mayor of Istanbul, was taken into custody along with around a hundred other mayoral staff on charges of “corruption” and “connection with terrorism”. The day before, his university degree (obtained 30 years ago) was arbitrarily annulled, with the obvious aim of preventing his candidacy in the next presidential election. Ekrem Imamoğlu, having twice won Istanbul’s municipal elections - in 2019 and 2024 - as a candidate for the CHP (Republican People’s Party, secular center-left), has established himself over time as Erdogan’s main opponent.

On March 23, the CHP was due to hold its “pre-elections” to decide on its candidate for the next ballot, normally scheduled for 2028 but most likely to take place earlier, to allow Erdogan to run one last time. Unless there is a constitutional change, which is also under discussion. The aim of this operation is therefore very clear: to render the main opposition candidate ineligible, criminalize his management of Istanbul’s mayoralty and perhaps even appoint an administrator in place of the elected mayor, as has been happening for several years in the municipalities of Kurdistan, in south-west Turkey.

Can you describe the mobilization in the face of this?

Today is the third day of mobilizations. Every day, the CHP calls for rallies in front of Istanbul City Hall. Tens of thousands of people are taking part. Of course, in addition to CHP members and supporters, all sectors of the opposition are mobilizing, including the radical left, against what has come to be known as the “March 19 coup”.

It’s worth remembering that the country has been living in an atmosphere of permanent repression since the Gezi revolt in 2013. The end of negotiations with the Kurdish movement, the remilitarization of the Kurdish question and the resumption of the war, the attempted coup d’état carried out by Erdogan’s former allies and the state of emergency decreed in its wake, the ban on strikes and the repression of the feminist and LGBTI+ movements are the main milestones in the development of authoritarianism articulated to the construction of an autocratic regime led by Erdogan. We are therefore in a country where mobilizations are rare, where the reflex to protest in the street has become quite unusual and risky for ordinary citizens. But despite this and the ban on rallies in Istanbul, there are major mobilizations and, above all, a spirit of protest that can be felt on the streets, in the workplace, on public transport, and so on.

On the second evening, in many parts of Istanbul and dozens of other cities, citizens came out to protest, with the main slogans “Government resign!”, “Down with the AKP dictatorship!”, “No individual liberation! All together or none of us”.

What is the scale of the mobilization among young people?

Precisely the most important and surprising element is the mobilization of university students. Universities have been depoliticized for years, radical left-wing movements are weak and their capacity for action is drastically reduced. So the current generation of students, while probably having grown up with stories of the Gezi revolt told by their parents, has almost no experience of organizing and mobilizing. This is true even of young revolutionary activists, who have not even had the opportunity to “do their job” in universities.

But despite this, through an “electric jolt” as Rosa Luxembourg1 used to say, a spontaneous radicalism is awakening in the universities. There are, of course, many social-economic (objective) and cultural-ideological (subjective) factors that come together to forge this mobilization. We’ll have to think about that later. But the fact that in a country that is becoming poorer, where it is difficult to find work, that offers no “promise of happiness” to young people, where years of study mean almost nothing on the job market, the fact that a diploma can be cancelled with a simple government pressure on the university is also an element that has probably contributed to achieving this jolt, in a sector of youth that was more or less predisposed to it.

What impact is this student radicalization having on the protests?

I think it’s shaking things up, and forcing the CHP to break out of its pre-constructed opposition patterns. As I said, CHP president Özgür Özel has called for a rally outside Istanbul town hall. But it has to be said that no serious preparations had been made to accommodate tens of thousands of people. The main objective was to call on citizens to vote in the pre-elections on March 23 and thus demonstrate Imamoğlu’s legitimacy against the regime, but also to continue the “fight” at the judicial level, by appealing, etc

Faced with this, the slogans most chanted by young people (who made up the majority of rallies in front of the mayor’s office) were “liberation is in the streets, not in the ballot box” or “resistance is in the streets, not in the ballot box”. Faced with this pressure from young people, who succeeded on several occasions in breaking down police barriers in front of universities, who marched en masse in Ankara to ODTÜ University and clashed with the CRS, who forced the police to send riot intervention vehicles to the universities (notably in Izmir), who refused to disperse at the end of official CHP rallies and wanted to march to Taksim (the historic symbolic site of resistance since the May 1st 1977 massacre to the Gezi uprising), the CHP leadership had to give in. Özgür Özel called on the people to “storm the squares”. “If obstacles are erected in front of us on the basis of an order contrary to the law, overthrow them, without hurting the police,” he added. Which is quite exceptional. Özel also agreed to install a second stand at Saraçhane, for the students.

How can we link this situation with what’s happening in Kurdistan, with the peace “process”?

It’s a very contradictory process, but one we’ve already experienced. Let’s not forget that during the Gezi uprising in 2013, when the west of the country was going up in flames, there were negotiations with Abdullah Öcalan, leader of the PKK. And of course, while the radical opposition to the regime usually came from the Kurdish regions, or from the Kurdish movement, this time their participation is naturally more limited. However, we saw that these two dynamics of contestation had converged in the candidacy of Selahattin Demirtaş, of the left-wing pro-Kurdish HDP party in the 2015 elections.

Today, while once again there is a process of “peace” according to the Kurds, of “disarmament” according to the regime (a facet of which can also be seen in the agreements initiated between Rojava and the new Syrian regime), the Turkish state is conducting a campaign of violent repression against the secular bourgeois opposition, journalists... but also against elements of the Kurdish movement. For the Kurds, the regime wants to show (above all to its own social and electoral base) that it still has its iron fist within its grasp, and that there is no question of negotiation but of “putting an end to terrorism”. As for the imprisonment of Imamoglu and other CHP mayors, if one of the charges is corruption, the other is links with or support for terrorism, since the CHP had forged an informal alliance with the Kurdish movement party in the 2024 municipal elections under the name of “urban consensus”.

Another surprising fact is that all demonstrations and gatherings in Istanbul have been banned except for Newroz, a festival celebrating the arrival of spring in the Middle East and the Caucasus, but which has acquired political-national significance for the Kurdish movement over several decades. So it could be said that Erdogan’s regime is trying to take another, decisive step in the construction of its regime, to reinforce its neo-fascist character by subduing the two biggest “chunks”, the secular bourgeois opposition represented by the CHP/Imamoglu and the Kurdish movement.

In the case of the former, by criminalizing it, imprisoning its representatives, perhaps forcing it to change its leadership and candidate, and finally destroying all legitimacy of the elections. As for the Kurdish movement, the regime will probably try to “de-radicalize” it, making it an ally at national and regional level (Syria, Iraq) in the hope that, in exchange for a few gains (of which no details are known at present), the movement will abandon its fight for the democratization of the entire country and guarantee a more peaceful existence with the regime. For the time being, the Dem Party (formerly HDP) has announced that it strongly opposes this “civil putsch” against Imamoglu and the other elected representatives, and that it is calling on the opposition forces to protest together at the Newroz rally on March 23.

Of course, we can’t anticipate the outcome of Erdogan’s two-pronged strategy, but as the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci once said, only the struggle can be foreseen

March 21 2025


Attached documentsturkey-a-mass-movement-builds-against-erdogan-s-power-grab_a8916.pdf (PDF - 899.5 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article8916]



Antoine Larrache
Antoine Larrache is editor of Inprecor and a member of the leadership of the Fourth International

Uraz Aydin
* Uraz Aydin is the editor of Yeniyol, the review of the Turkish section of the Fourth International, and one of many academics dismissed for having signed a petition in favour of peace with the Kurdish people, in the context of the state of emergency decreed after the attempted coup in 2016.


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.



Popular Fury Grows in Turkey Against Tyrannical Erdoğan Emboldened by Trump

The imprisonment of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, the far-right president's top political rival, has unleashed a new wave of protests against increasingly autocratic rule.



A protester wearing a gas mask and dressed as a Whirling Dervish is pepper sprayed by police during clashes with police in front of Istanbul's famous Aquaduct on March 23, 2025 in Istanbul, Turkey. The Mayor of Istanbul Ekrem Imamoglu, who was due to be selected as a presidential candidate for the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) during a primary election today, was jailed on corruption charges following his detention earlier this week.
(Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

Jon Queally
Mar 24, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

International outrage and charges of "viciousness" and "outright autocracy" have followed Sunday's imprisonment of Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's top political rival, the popular Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, who is seen as Erdogan's likeliest opposition challenger in upcoming national elections.

The corruption charges levied against İmamoğlu, a member of the Republican People's Party (CHP), are seen as politically motivated and follow days of sustained protests by opposition voices opposed to Erdoğan's increasingly authoritarian rule.

Tens of thousands marched and clashed with riot police after fresh protests erupted Sunday in Istanbul and elsewhere in the country following the court's actions against İmamoğlu and on Monday, the CHP announced that nearly 15 million people, members and non-members alike, participated in national primaries to support the jailed mayor's candidacy to face off against Erdoğan in the next election.

The non-member vote of more than 13 million, "could indicate," reportsNBC News, "that İmamoğlu, 54, enjoys wide public support beyond the party faithful. The party's chairman said it showed the need for early elections."

Writing for Politico Europe, opinion editor Jamie Dettmer argues that that timing of Erdoğan's targeting of İmamoğlu has everything to do with the return of U.S. President Donald Trump to the international scene.

Erdoğan, Dettmer wrote on Saturday, "has spent years eroding democracy, stifling dissent and purging the country's army and civil service. Now, it looks as though he's chosen this geopolitical moment to bury the legacy of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the secular founder of the Republic of Turkey." He continued:
Erdoğan would harbor no worries as to Trump’s disapproval. The two have lavished priase on each other for years, and the Turkish leader has said he supports his American counterpart’s peace initiative in Ukraine—no doubt music to Trump’s ears.

Erdoğan isn't alone among the once embattled autocrats—and would-be autocrats—sniffing the change in the geopolitical air, and reckoning they're on the cusp of a new era, able to erase the rules and norms of old and replace them with ones more to their liking. It's influencing their behavior as they look to each other for inspiration and new ideas for running their respective countries—whether it be weaponizing policies affecting sexual minorities, scapegoating migrants, sharpening attacks on independent media, transforming public broadcasters into government mouthpieces or just closing them down.

Since his arrest on March 19, the ousted mayor has denied all charges against him and urged his supporters to continue protests in the face of the government crackdown.

"I totally believe these are bogus charges," Emre Can Erdogdu, a university student in Istanbul who attended street protests Sunday night, told the New York Times. "We entirely lost our trust in the government."

Erdogdu said he feared for the future of Turkey. "A person who could be the next president is now out of politics. It is not just about Istanbul. It is about all of Turkey."



Özgür Özel, the CHP chair, said the imprisonment would not dampen the party's prospects, but only further ignite the growing opposition. "Starting from tomorrow morning," he said from Istanbul on Sunday evening, "we will initiate a great struggle by harnessing the power of organization and using this strength for the good sake of all of us."

He called for "all democrats and all those who care the future of Turkey" to come out in sustained protest.

According to the Hürriyet Daily News, over 1,100 people have been arrested since mass protests erupted last week over İmamoğlu's initial arrest. Criticism only grew the court on Sunday stripped him of his position and sent him to prison.

"By arresting his main political rival," said human rights advocate and scholar Kenneth Roth, "Erdoğan shows he is too fearful of losing to risk even a managed election."

Roth said Erdoğan, an ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, would rather "opt for an electoral charade" than hold free and fair elections.



With Turkish officials set to visit the United States this week to visit with U.S. counterparts, world's richest man Elon Musk, who has taken a seat as a top advisor to Trump, is under fire for blocking accounts of opposition figures in Turkey on his social media platform X.

As Politicoreported over the weekend:
The majority of the suspended accounts were "university-associated activist accounts, basically sharing protest information, locations for students to go," Yusuf Can,coordinator and analyst at the Wilson Center's Middle East Program, told POLITICO. Many of these accounts are "grassroots activists" with their followings in the low tens of thousands, said Can.

Some accounts appear to be suspended only in Turkey and not in the rest of the world. Activist Ömer Faruk Aslan created a second account to avoid censorship. "Yesterday, my account was blocked by a court order because the tweets exceeded 6 million views," he posted.

Last week, Human Rights Watch said that İmamoğlu's arrest, as well as the targeting of other opposition figures, was politically motivated and an assault on the rule of law.

"Ekrem İmamoğlu and others detained should be released from police custody immediately," said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director for the group. "The Erdoğan presidency should ensure that the results of the Istanbul municipal elections are respected and that the criminal justice system is not weaponized for political ends."

Turkey detains 1,100 protesters since Erdogan rival held

LARGEST MASS DEMOS IN DECADES



By AFP
March 24, 2025


A whirling dervish stands in front riot police in Istanbul - Copyright AFP YASIN AKGUL

Police have detained more than 1,100 people, officials said Monday — including journalists — since the arrest of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s main rival triggered some of Turkey’s worst unrest in years.

The demonstrations began in Istanbul after Ekrem Imamoglu’s arrest last week and have since spread to more than 55 of Turkey’s 81 provinces, sparking clashes with riot police and drawing international condemnation.

The popular 53-year-old has been widely seen as the only politician who could defeat Turkey’s longtime leader Erdogan at the ballot box.

In just four days he went from being the mayor of Istanbul — a post that launched Erdogan’s political rise decades earlier — to being arrested, interrogated, jailed and stripped of the mayorship as a result of a graft and terror probe.

On Sunday, he was overwhelmingly voted in as the main opposition CHP’s candidate for the 2028 presidential run, with the ballot — that was opened beyond the party’s 1.7 million members — attracting 15 million votes.

A party spokesman on Monday confirmed his election as the party’s candidate.

Observers said it was the looming primary that triggered the move against Imamoglu, the main political rival of Erdogan who has dominated Turkey’s politics since 2003, first as prime minister and then as president.

His jailing drew a sharp condemnation from Germany, which called it “totally unacceptable”.

Early on Monday, police detained 10 Turkish journalists at home, including an AFP photographer, “for covering the protests”, the MLSA rights group said in a statement.

It said most of them were covering the mass demonstrations outside City Hall, where tens of thousands rallied late Sunday, a move denounced by Imamoglu’s wife.

“What is being done to members of the press and journalists is a matter of freedom. None of us can remain silent about this,” wrote Dilek Kaya Imamoglu on X.

Police have detained more than 1,133 people over “illegal activities” since the protests began Wednesday, Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said.



– Lawyers detained –



As on previous nights, Sunday’s gathering — the fifth such mass protest — descended into fierce clashes with riot seen kicking and beating people in Istanbul and elsewhere, AFP correspondents said.

There was no immediate word on overnights arrests but the Izmir Bar Association in the western coastal city said police had arrested two local lawyers, including its former head, who were representing protesters.

Early Monday, Istanbul governor Davut Gul accused demonstrators of “damaging mosques and cemeteries”, warning: “Any attempt to disrupt public order will not be tolerated,” he wrote on X.

As he was being shipped off to Silivri prison on the megacity’s western outskirts, Imamoglu had denounced the judicial moves against him as a political “execution without trial”.

In a later message from prison as tens of thousands rallied for a fifth night, he sounded a defiant tone.

“I wear a white shirt that you cannot stain. I have a strong arm that you cannot twist. I won’t budge an inch. I will win this war,” he said in the message passed through his lawyers.

Throughout Sunday, millions voted in the CHP’s highly symbolic primary — which effectively became a de facto referendum.

“Out of a total of 15 million votes, 13,211,000 are solidarity votes,” City Hall said, referring to the number of ballots cast by those who were not CHP members.

Faced with the massive protests, Turkey’s authorities sought to shut down more than 700 accounts on X, the online platform said Sunday.

“We object to multiple court orders from the Turkish Information and Communication Technologies Authority to block over 700 accounts of news organisations, journalists, political figures, students, and others within Turkiye,” its communications team said in a statement.

Crackdown on opposition tips Turkey into financial turbulence



By AFP
March 24, 2025


Chaos after Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu's arrest has battered the Turkish lira - Copyright AFP/File JUAN BARRETO



Rémi BANET

The arrest of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s leading political opponent has sparked a financial firestorm and thrust the hardline leader’s economic policies under scrutiny.

The stock market has plunged, the lira has plummeted and economists warn the ensuing panic will drive Turkey’s sharp inflation rate back up just as it had started to rein it in.

The arrest of Istanbul’s mayor Ekrem Imamoglu on March 19 in a graft and terror probe sparked fierce street clashes that have since seen more than 1,000 others detained.

“Erdogan started a new economic fire and turned the markets upside down,” economist Mustafa Sonmez told AFP.



– Stock markets fall –



Turkey’s BIST stock index fell 8.7 percent on the day of Imamoglu’s arrest and 7.8 percent two days later, down more than 16 percent in a week — its sharpest decline since the early days of the great world economic crisis in 2008.

It recovered by nearly three percent on Monday, remaining down more than 14 percent on the week overall.

Protests continued and European powers branded the arrest an affront to democracy.

The country’s state-controlled financial authority tweaked its trading rules in a bid to stabilise the markets.



– Currency plunges –



The Turkish lira plunged, prompting the central bank to step in. Economists say it spent more than $20 billion buying up lira to try to prop up its value.

Despite this, the lira remained around its historic low of 38 to the dollar on Monday.

“The central bank and government is trying to calm the market and to limit volatility,” said Emre Akcakmak, a portfolio advisor at investment group East Capital.

“It’s very difficult to attract longer-term strategic foreign investors to Turkey in this kind of environment where even locals don’t have a full understanding of what’s happening.”



– Inflation trap –



The lira’s plunge raised fears that Turkey would falter in its recent fight against surging inflation, which has sharply driven up the cost of household items.

The inflation rate reached 85 percent in late 2022.

Erdogan, a conservative from the Islamist-rooted AKP party, had previously voiced the unorthodox view that raising interest rates drives up inflation — rather than lowering it, as central bankers typically aim to do through rate hikes. Turkey nevertheless resorted to raising rates in 2023.

Inflation was hauled under 40 percent last month for the first time in two years and authorities were aiming to bring it below 24 percent by the end of this year.

“At times like these, those who have money run to foreign currencies, gold and real estate as a haven, and that feeds inflation,” warned Sonmez.



– Investment worries –



The chaos caused by Imamoglu’s arrest, along with the recent prosecution of two senior businessmen critical of the authorities, poses a challenge for Economy Minister Mehmet Simsek.

He has spent two years trying to draw back investors who had turned away from Turkey due to political tensions and Erdogan’s unorthodox monetary policy.

“It was never an easy task for Simsek. It was always mission impossible — and now this is just one more bump on his way,” said Akcakmak.

“It’s very difficult to attract longer-term strategic foreign investors to Turkey in this kind of environment where even locals don’t have a full understanding of what’s happening.”



– Pressure on minister –



Simsek, a former economist of US bank Merrill Lynch, was forced on Sunday to deny opposition claims that he was going to resign.

“We are working on this and we will continue to take all measures necessary for the correct functioning of the markets,” the minister wrote on X.

“I beg you not to believe false news.”

Erdogan threw his full support behind Simsek on Monday.





 

‘No Other Land’: The paradoxes of an Oscar win in a West Bank under siege

Published 

A Palestinian woman sits on the ruins of her house that was destroyed by the Israeli military in Masafer Yatta, January 2023. Photo from Wikimedia Commons.

First published at Canadian Dimension.

It’s not even five in the morning, but the entire village is awake for suhur, the morning meal before beginning the Ramadan fast. In the midst of feasting on eggs, bread, and dates, word begins to travel through Masafer Yatta that No Other Land, a film about this very place, has won an Academy Award. For the rest of the day, every activist in Masafer Yatta is playing Basel Adra’s acceptance speech on their phone. The atmosphere felt surreal. Just the night before, settlers had stormed the village of Susya, home to co-director Hamdan Ballal, hurling rocks and breaking windows of homes and cars.

In the village of Um Al Kheir, where a demolition took place just a week before the Academy Awards, many of the villagers have personally seen countless demolitions in their community. But, most have not seen the film that portrays their lives. The day after the award ceremony, Palestinian and international activists in Um Al Kheir gathered in an office to watch the film. As they watched, it was clear the Palestinian activists were intimately familiar with every demolition depicted on the screen. They told us in which village it took place and the family who lost their home, and they knew the names of the soldiers and police. Against the backdrop of constant settler attacks and army incursions, it felt like a small miracle to watch the entire movie without interruption.

When the film ended, the room was quiet for a bit. Then, an international visitor asked one of the Palestinian activists what he thought about the movie? Eid Hathaleen, an activist and artist from Um Al Kheir, who has documented nearly every demolition in the region, and who experienced his own home demolition over the summer, spoke first. He said the film was very powerful. “I’ve seen many demolitions, but I’ve never seen them shown in a story this way.” With visuals, narration, and a musical score, the same demolitions he had witnessed in person had a different impact.

An activist in his 20s, born and raised in Firing Zone 918 in the southern West Bank, who does not wish to be identified, speaks passionately about the movie when asked. He first saw it when it was screened in the Masafer Yatta village of At-Tuwani, where Basel Adra is from. He describes the initiatives locals took to get their story out before the documentary. In addition to social media, there have been blogsarticles, and short films. Of course, audiences of thousands were reached through these methods, but they pale in comparison to the numbers of people who have heard of Masafer Yatta because of No Other Land.

“Millions of people are watching our story.” Like Basel, this man is not an activist by choice, but by necessity. Having spent more of his childhood in the company of soldiers than at the movies or goofing off with his friends, his path seemed preordained. These activists hope that the movie accomplishes what they have been trying to achieve for decades. They hope more people will learn about their situation and speak up against the injustice. They hope more international visitors will come here to engage in protective presence. And above all, they hope for an end to violence, harassment, and demolitions.

The dreams of the people of Masafer Yatta are modest. They simply want the same access to safety, water, electricity, and education that most of us in Canada take for granted. The suspension of these fundamental rights is not lost on me as I visit the area for my fourth time. Prior to his departure for the award ceremony, Hamdan was joking about where he might keep his Academy Award if he won. Surely it wouldn’t last a week in his home before settlers or soldiers took it.

In the wake of its Oscar win, No Other Land has been criticized for normalizing the Occupation and violating Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) guidelines. Normalization is when Palestinians and Israelis join forces in a way that fails to recognize the power imbalance between the two sides. By failing to explicitly acknowledge the privilege and oppression inherent in apartheid, these partnerships, the argument goes, serve to justify Israeli propaganda that characterizes the Occupation as a conflict that can be solved merely through mutual understanding.

On March 5, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), the academic and cultural branch of the BDS movement created by Palestinian civil society groups, published a statement noting the BDS standards that the movie fails to uphold. First, financial support for the film came from Close Up, an organization that is itself accused of engaging in normalization. Second, some of the Israeli members of the film crew “have failed to acknowledge that Israel is perpetrating a genocide, or have even made extremely harmful, immoral statements drawing a false equivalence between the colonizer and the colonized that may be used to rationalize Israel’s genocide.” PACBI acknowledges that the Israeli crew updated a previous statement to fulfill this anti-normalization requirement. The organization went on to say that Palestinian filmmakers like Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal do not and should not need Israeli counterparts or approval to tell their stories. They can stand on their own as credible narrators of their history and lives.

The first time I saw No Other Land, I was shocked at the intimate friendship between Basel and Yuval that it portrayed. After hearing so much about the film while visiting Masafer Yatta, I expected it to revolve solely around the various villages facing demolitions. Later when I again visited the area, I heard that the documentary had been pitched many times before it was picked up. For most of these pitches, the film was as I imagined it, a documentary exclusively about the situation in Masafer Yatta, without the story of Basel and Yuval’s friendship. However, no one willing to produce the film could be found until the storyline of an Israeli-Palestinian friendship was added. Someone jokes that whenever they try to talk about the demolitions in Masafer Yatta during interviews, reporters instead ask about the friendship between Basel and Yuval. To their frustration, as peoples’ homes hung in the balance, the burning question was how they could possibly manage to be friends.

When I arrived at Masafer Yatta one month ago, many of the people here were understandably pervaded by a sense of hopelessness. In the time since I’ve been here, there have been more demolitions in this small area than I ever expected to witness. These demolitions, depicted so rawly in the film, are dreadful to watch. With a line of officers separating villagers and activists from getting near the bulldozers, little can be done to stop an impending demolition.

Political and social pressure, both from within these borders and internationally, often seems the most successful route to ending evictions and settler incursions. In these villages, most people wake up every morning and wonder if their house will still be standing by nightfall. The erratic and violent behaviour from settlers and soldiers often makes it difficult to plan for the future — the next day or the next year. But there have been wins, such as the school in At-Tuwani featured in the movie, and others, such as permission to rebuild homes in the ethnically cleansed village of Zanuta.

On March 10, PACBI issued an additional comment and FAQ about their previous statement regarding No Other Land. In it, they reaffirm their position, and also emphasize that they have not called for a boycott of the film. A few days after the Oscar win, some international activists were asked to watch a group of children in the village of Um Al Kheir as their mothers watched the film for the first time. Despite the fact that the children regularly come face to face with machine-gun-wielding soldiers and settlers, the mothers didn’t want them to see the movie. Or perhaps they couldn’t bear to watch them watching the movie.

For a community that has fought so hard for the very right to exist, this film and the accompanying global discussion, opens up possibilities. In his acceptance speech, Basel speaks of his hopes of a different life for his daughter. This too is the dream of every parent I’ve met in Masafer Yatta. For them, an award or a position statement changes little in their day to day realities. But the movie is important because it tells their story to the world.

Anna Lippman is a third-generation Ashkenzi Jewish settler on Turtle Island (North America). She is a PhD student in Sociology at York University. Anna’s research looks at identity, and how young people’s thoughts about themselves are influenced by the world around them. Anna organizes with several groups in Toronto including Showing Up for Racial Justice and Independent Jewish Voices.

 

Shifting Allegiances: The Role of Palestine in US Domestic and Foreign Policy


It is crucial for any American administration to recognize that, regardless of political agendas, the views of the American public regarding the situation in Palestine and Israel are undergoing a significant shift. A critical mass of opinion is rapidly forming, and this change is becoming undeniable.

Paradoxically, while Islamophobia continues to rise across the US, sentiments supporting Palestinians and opposing Israeli occupation are steadily increasing.

In theory, this means that the pro-Israeli media’s success in linking Israel’s actions against the Palestinian people to the so-called “war on terror” – a narrative that has demonized Islam and Muslims for many years – is faltering.

Americans are increasingly viewing the situation in Palestine as a human rights issue, and one that is deeply relevant to domestic politics. A recent Gallup poll underscores this shift.

The poll, released on March 6, was conducted between February 3 and 16. It found that American support for Israel is at its lowest point in 25 years, while sympathy for Palestinians has reached its highest level. Having 46 percent of Americans supporting Israel and 33 percent supporting Palestinians would have seemed inconceivable in the past, when the plight of Palestine and its people was largely overlooked by the general public.

Even more remarkable is that this shift continues to gain momentum, despite the fact that mainstream media and American politicians have been more biased than ever, promoting a dehumanizing discourse of Palestinians and unprecedented, uncritical support for Israel.

While the growing shift in favor of Palestine – particularly the genocide in Gaza, which played a role in influencing political outcomes in several states during the last presidential election – has gone largely unnoticed by the Biden administration, it’s clear that the dissatisfaction with the government’s position remains unchanged.

The previous administration approved significant military aid to Israel, topping $17.9 billion in the first year alone, enabling its genocidal war in Gaza, resulting in over 160,000 casualties over a span of 15 months.

Yet, this blatant disregard for Palestinian lives and rights persisted under the new administration of Donald Trump, who appointed some of the most staunchly anti-Palestinian, pro-Israel figures to key positions in his government.

Trump did this despite making repeated, though often contradictory, promises to end the war and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Instead, the US President approved the release of a shipment of heavy MK-84 bombs and passed a nearly $3 billion arms sale to Israel.

Trump also introduced a new US policy that solely focused on “taking ownership” of Gaza and displacing its population. Although this position was inconsistently articulated, Trump ultimately, on March 14, seemed to reverse it altogether. This left many wondering whether US foreign policy was truly independent or simply a reflection of Israel’s influence and its Washington lobby.

Unlike Biden, whose support for Israel has been consistent, Trump’s stance has been confusing and contradictory. The US news portal Axios reported on March 5 that talks between the US, led by Adam Boehler, and Hamas had taken place in Doha. In an interview with CNN four days later, Boehler made the striking statement that US and Israeli foreign policies should be seen as separate. “We’re the United States. We’re not an agent of Israel,” he said.

However, as analysts began mulling over this unprecedented language, it was soon revealed that Boehler was removed from his position, and the traditional, unwavering support for Israel quickly returned.

As US policymakers continue to swing between their unwavering commitment to Israel and the “America first” rhetoric, they must keep in mind the following:

First, the American public is increasingly aware of events in Palestine, so masking Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights under the guise of “Israel’s right to defend itself” no longer suffices.

Second, US and Israeli interests are not identical: the US seeks geopolitical dominance followed by stabilization and so-called ‘containment,’ while Israel thrives on provocations, destabilization, and long-lasting conflicts.

Third, Palestine has become a domestic issue in the US, and the debate on Palestine and Israel is no longer one-sided. Growing support for Palestine means that more US voters will base their future political decisions on how the US engages with Israel and its disregard for Palestinian rights.

Fourth, crackdowns on dissent, arrests of activists, and funding cuts will only deepen the polarization around this issue, rather than fostering an open, informed, and productive debate about a matter of great importance to millions of Americans. Such actions are quickly eroding the reputation of the US as a democratic state and undermining confidence in its commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict.

Palestine may not be the sole measure by which the Trump administration will be judged, nor the only factor shaping future voting patterns. Yet, it is undoubtedly a crucial test. If the contradictions persist, and the US continues to provide unwavering military support for Israel, Palestine could become the defining issue that contributes to the unraveling of US foreign policy, not only in the Middle East but around the world.

It is not too late for this trajectory to shift, or for some degree of balance to emerge. The lives of millions are at stake.

Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out. His other books include My Father was a Freedom Fighter and The Last Earth. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.

 

‘Where Was the UN?’ Asks Freed Israeli Captive. Its Staff Were Busy Being Killed

Sympathy for Israeli former captive Eli Sharabi must not obscure the bigger picture: he has allowed himself to be recruited to Israel's propaganda campaign for genocide

 Posted on

Israel has found a captive recently released from Gaza willing to regurgitate some of its most nonsensical talking points on the stage of the United Nations. Predictably, those talking points are already being exploited to justify Israel intensifying its slaughter of Palestinian children in Gaza – and further bully the United Nations into even greater timidity.

Eli Sharabi has every reason to feel aggrieved. After all, he not only spent 490 days in captivity in terrifying conditions before his release last month, but emerged to find his family had been killed during Hamas’ break-out from Gaza on 7 October 2023.

Nonetheless, sympathy for his plight should not obscure the bigger picture: he has allowed himself to be recruited to the Israeli government’s propaganda campaign for genocide.

He has echoed Israeli politicians in claiming that Palestinians in Gaza – all 2.3 million of them, apparently – are “involved” in the mistreatment of the Israeli captives. In other words, he has given succour to the Israeli government’s efforts to justify the extermination of Gaza’s entire population, half of whom are children.

He has also claimed that Hamas stole aid that entered Gaza to eat “like kings”, while he and the captives starved. In other words, he is bolstering the argument of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel is justified in blocking food and water to Gaza – a crime against humanity for which Netanyahu is being sought by the International Criminal Court.

But perhaps most ludicrously of all, Sharabi asks of the two largest bodies involved in humanitarian operations on behalf of the destitute, decimated people of Gaza: “Where was the Red Cross when we [the Israeli captives] needed them? Where was the UN?”

Sharabi, more than anyone, ought to know the answer to his own question.

Local staff of the UN and Red Cross – or Red Crescent as it is known in Gaza – have spent the past year and a half living under constant and ferocious air strikes, like everyone else in the enclave. Large numbers have been killed and maimed by the US-supplied bombs Israel has been dropping continuously.

They have certainly not been idle, as Sharabi suggests. When they have not been killed themselves, they have been dealing with the many tens of thousands of dead and the hundreds of thousands of wounded.

And all the while, they have been desperately struggling to help feed a population that Israel has spent the past 18 months actively starving through its strict blockade of food and water into the tiny territory.

The job of the UN and Red Cross has been to save life. That is what they have been doing. Their job is not to go on a wild goose chase, trying to find Israeli captives that Israel itself, with all its technological know-how and military might, has been unable to locate.

Where was the UN?

Did Sharabi’s Israeli government handlers – led by Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the UN – forget to explain to him that Israel has formally banned the UN from Gaza? Israel both bars the UN from the enclave, specifically targeting local staff with its weapons, and yet also expects those same staff to track down the Israeli captives held there. How can one even begin to take Israel’s position – or Sharabi’s – seriously?

Where was the Red Cross?

Did Sharabi’s Israeli government handlers forget to mention that, also, the Red Cross has not been able to visit a single one of the thousands of Palestinians who have been abducted by Israel from Gaza, including doctors, women and children?

Unlike the Israeli captives, the location of the Palestinian captives is known. They are being held in what the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem calls “torture camps” inside Israel, where sexual assaults and rapes are commonplace.

Israel has refused the Red Cross access for a simple reason: because it doesn’t want the world to know what it is doing to Palestinians inside those torture camps. And the western media is complying, barely reporting the horrors unearthed by human rights groups and UN investigators.

Yes, the Israeli captives have gone through a horrific experience. And their greatest trauma – though Sharabi, unlike his fellow Israeli captives, fails to mention it – was living under Israel’s constant bombs: the equivalent so far of six Hiroshimas. None knew from one day to the next whether they would be vaporized by one of the 2,000lb bombs supplied by the US and dropped all over the enclave.

It is important to hear Sharabi’s account of his captivity on a stage as visible as the UN’s. But it is equally important for the UN to hear from the thousands of Palestinians abducted by Israel and held in even more horrifying conditions, as repeatedly documented by human rights groups.

Yet those Palestinian victims, victims of Israeli barbarism, have not been provided with the platform offered to Sharabi. Why? Because Israel gets to decide who speaks at the UN, for both Israelis and Palestinians.

Unlike Hamas, Israel holds its captives permanently prisoner, even after they have been released from its torture camps. It holds them in a giant open-air concentration camp called Gaza. And they won’t find themselves on a stage at the UN – not unless Israel allows it.

Jonathan Cook is the author of three books on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and a winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. His website and blog can be found at www.jonathan-cook.net. This originally appeared in Jonathan Cook’s Substack.

 

Medicine and Martyrs


The dead and wounded lay scattered around the street. One man, with a fist-sized black hole in his stomach, lay still in a state of shock. Nearby, a shirtless teenage boy in a pool of blood screamed in pain. Further away another man was unconscious, his right leg seared off just below the knee and placed next to him by a good samaritan. Civilians moved around frantically, shouting in panic and unsure of what to do.

“This is a video I took yesterday when a bomb exploded in Deir Al-Balah,” nineteen-year-old Mohammed Kassab told me. “All my thoughts and dreams are to be a doctor, so I can treat those injured in the war.”

“Then instead of filming them,” I said. “why don’t you help them? You know it often takes a long time for paramedics to arrive, and you keep complaining about Israel ruining your chance to go to medical school. You can learn to administer first aid and save people from dying.”

Mohammed was still young enough to think he needed someone’s permission to take action. He didn’t realize he could take the initiative on his own. He told me everyday about his desire to help his people, so I started giving him advice from my Wilderness First Responder training. It turns out their focus on medical care in remote, low-resource settings fits perfectly in Gaza, where even the hospitals run out of medical.

“People often bleed out from traumatic injuries. Learn how to tie a rope to use as a tourniquet to stop the bleeding,” I said. “Always carry a piece of rope with you for that purpose. If you don’t have one, a belt will do.”

“Thank you, my friend, for these tips,” Mohammed replied. “I have never found anyone to advise me like you. Thank you really! ♥️♥️♥️

It’s amazing how simple encouragement can make a difference in someone’s life. I had met Mohammed three months before in May 2024. He was desperately trying to raise money for his family. He sent me TikTok videosInstagram posts and other links to promote his GoFoundMe, but like many refugees he felt embarrassed about seeking charity.

“Before the war, we did not ask for money like this. We were living a decent life. My father, Khaled, was a policeman for the Palestinian Authority. I was planning to start pre-med. But we are now without homes, without a homeland, without anything.”

The family had been forced by the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) to exchange their home in Khan Younis for a tarp and twine shelter in Al-Mawasi in December 2023. By February they were displaced again. This time to a proper refugee tent in Deir al-Balah where they remained until the January 2025 ceasefire.

Mohammed is the second oldest of six children. He’s well groomed and neat in appearance like the rest of his family—a remarkable achievement for people living in tents with limited access to running water and electricity. He has one brother and four sisters—all, like their forty-something parents Khaled and Tahrir, struggling to stay alive. The youngest, a baby girl named Massa, has a full head of luxurious reddish-brown hair, honey-brown eyes and a beaming smile. In photos she’s often wearing a stylish magenta headband or posing for the camera. Sisters Mayar, age nine, Mona, age thirteen, and brother Malek, age sixteen, are the next oldest. The most senior is Mohammed’s sister Malak, age twenty-one, who was looking forward to her wedding until the Israeli invasion ruined her plans. She was forced to marry in a tent. Though her wedding dress was buried under the rubble, Malak was still able to find a plain white dress for the photo shoot at her grandfather’s house—one of the few homes that still stands today. The ceremony and reception were muted—they didn’t play music out of respect for the martyrs and the wedding cake was a plate of date-filled Palestinian cookies called Ma’amoul. Only the wedding bands survived the evacuation and eventual destruction of their homes, their neighborhoods, their lives.

Mohammed informs me when friends and family die.

“My friend Ramzi was martyred in February 2024. He was trying to find a passageway to get his family to safety, but found himself near a group of young men who the IDF targeted with a bomb. He was burned from head to toe. When I found out, I went to Nasser Hospital, and transported Ramzi’s body to the cemetery where we buried him. It took over two hours to dig his grave with my uncles. I was very sad about what happened.”

Digging a loved one’s grave must be the most grievous of tasks.

“My cousin Ali was seriously injured in July 2024 in a bombing in Deir al-Balah. He had a traumatic brain injury. We went to the American Hospital and watched him die. We cried a lot. Then his father Bilal carried him to the cemetery and buried him.”

Mohammed sent me a video of Ali’s funeral. They had bought a ready-made grave. It was only a few feet deep and lined with concrete blocks. The dead boy’s face had an angelic quality to it, like he was at peace, like he had transcended the horror around him. It reminded me of how my dad looked when he died.

Death was attributed to inanimate objects as well.

“Two months ago, we received news that our house had been blown up. My father and I walked to Khan Younis and found our former home completely demolished. We searched for anything valuable, but all we found were some dolls and clothes for my brothers.”

A couple of weeks after Mohammed showed me the bombing video, I asked him if he had started volunteering at a hospital or medical clinic.

“The situation here does not allow that,” he told me. “My father wants me to open a stall to sell supplies, so we can earn a living.”

How does one earn a living in the middle of a genocide?

“When you are not working at the stall, spend your time helping people whenever you get the chance,” I replied. “Whether it’s repairing a tent or digging for survivors in the rubble, take the opportunity to help. Talk with as many medical professionals as you can. Maybe you could ride with them in an ambulance someday or become an orderly. It’s a long hard struggle, and you might even die performing your duties, but at least you would live knowing you were doing your best.”

“Yes, I will definitely do that,” he said. “We struggle to survive and also to help each other.”

“Study battlefield first aid as much as you can,” I continued. “You can find combat trauma training PDFs online to download. There are also YouTube channels which will show you how to deal with burn, blast and firearms injuries”

“Of course, my friend! ♥️ Every day I watch videos of experts in the field of medicine…and follow the advice they give. ♥️🙏

Whenever I asked Mohammed how he was doing, he often responded with the latest massacre that had occurred.

“Last night we woke up in the middle of the night to the sounds of very violent bombing. 🥺 More than fifteen martyrs were recovered from the bombed areas.”

There were a lot of forced evacuations that summer. The IDF would declare an area unsafe and drop leaflets giving people a day or two to leave. It was heartbreaking to watch the videos of familes running in terror to get away while carrying all they could on their backs. Even children pulled pieces of luggage behind them. Huge traffic jams were created at odd hours of the night as the sea of humanity struggled to move in the chaos. Those unable to walk died in the subsequent battles if their family could not afford to pay for a taxi or donkey cart to move them. Sometimes the IDF even bombed the refugees as they were fleeing. I told Mohammed that “the people should stop running and die with dignity where they were instead of being herded like animals to the next refugee camp.”

“Thank you, my dear friend, for your concern and everything you do for the families here. You are truly a wonderful person. I hope everyone is like you.”

I thought about Ukrainian president Zelensky being accused of lacking gratitude at the White House. I wonder if Donald Trump or JD Vance had ever thanked anyone like Mohammed had thanked me.

After the ceasefire came into effect on January 19th, 2025, the family moved back to Khan Younis and rented an apartment they couldn’t afford. Mohammed’s father got his policeman’s job back, but he only makes $700 a month. Rent is $300, while groceries are astronomical ever since Israel sealed the border and cut off the electricity in early March.

On his birthday in February, Mohammed posted a photo of himself in a leather jacket with a faux fur lining on the hood. It was his first Facebook post since October 7th, 2023.

On March 18th, Israel broke the ceasefire with a wave of bombings that killed over four hundred people, the majority of whom were women and children. One bomb landed next to Mohammed’s apartment. In the bedroom facing the blast, a security window made of metal and glass was blown in, but luckily a bulky desk shielded Mohammed’s mother and her baby daughter from shrapnel. Mohammed posted a video of the aftermath on social media to illustrate the family’s brush with death and praised God for letting them live.

The next day I read a BBC article about a Palestinian father who lost three sons in the latest air strikes on Gaza. At least one of the boys wanted to be a doctor like Mohammed. The day after that the IDF invaded Gaza. But this time there was no warning, no leaflets, and so still, like Mohammed, after almost eighteen months of war, no one in Gaza has any idea what will become of them or those they love.

Eros Salvatore is a writer and filmmaker living in Bellingham, Washington. They have been published in the journals Anti-Heroin Chic and The Blue Nib among others, and have shown two short films in festivals. They have a BA from Humboldt State University, and a foster daughter who grew up under the Taliban in a tribal area of Pakistan. Read other articles by Eros, or visit Eros's website.