Wednesday, April 29, 2026

  

Organisers of high-level climate summit in Colombia say 'we must transition away from fossil fuels'

Stientje van Veldhoven, Minister of Climate Policy and Green Growth of the Netherlands, embraces Colombia's Environmental Minister Irene Vélez Torres Tuesday, April 28, 2026.
Stientje van Veldhoven, Minister of Climate Policy and Green Growth of the Netherlands, embraces Colombia's Environmental Minister Irene Vélez Torres Tuesday, April 28, 2026. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia

By Emma De Ruiter
Published on 

The two-day segment of ministers and senior officials marks the political centerpiece of the First Conference on Transitioning away from Fossil Fuels, where more than 50 countries have been discussing how to move away from oil, gas and coal.

World leaders have gathered in Colombia's Santa Marta for the first-ever global talks to accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels, a step participating nations say is not just a climate priority but vital for energy independence.

The two-day summit of ministers and senior officials marks the political centerpiece of the First Conference on Transitioning away from Fossil Fuels, where more than 50 countries have been discussing how to move away from oil, gas and coal — the main drivers of global warming — toward cleaner energy.

The conference was announced last year after the official UN COP30 climate summit ended in Brazil, which failed to include an explicit reference to fossil fuels in its final deal.

The meeting reflects growing frustration among some governments and advocates that decades of UN climate negotiations have failed to directly address fossil fuel production, prompting the Santa Marta summit to push the issue outside formal talks.

Recent negotiations have acknowledged the need for a transition, but countries remain divided over how to implement it and how to finance the shift.

“The conclusion is unavoidable, we must transition away from fossil fuels — not just because it’s good for climate, but because it strengthens our energy independence and security,” said Stientje van Veldhoven, minister for climate policy and green growth for the Netherlands, which is co-hosting the conference with Colombia.

"We in Europe...are losing half a billion euros each day this war continues," the EU's climate envoy Wopke Hoekstra told delegates.

"We already had a very good reason to move on (from fossil fuels) for climate action...We now also have it for commercial reasons, and reasons of independence."

Energy independence in the wake of the Iran war

Organisers also say the Middle East war, which has throttled Gulf energy exports, has underscored the urgency of breaking fossil fuel dependence.

"Some people use independence, some people use sovereignty, but basically they need energy security," the UK's climate envoy Rachel Kyte told AFP in Santa Marta.

"Increasingly, the world is concluding that fossil fuels are a source of instability."

Even as record investments flow into renewable energy, scientists warn the pace is still too slow to keep global temperature rises to safer levels.

The world has already warmed about 1.4C above pre-industrial times and is tracking to blow past 1.5C in a matter of years.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro warned that “the Amazon rainforest is burning,” adding that “without it we reach a point of no return.”

He said UN climate talks have fallen short, arguing that “the unity of states has failed” and calling for broader action beyond governments.

Petro also linked current conflicts to energy dependence, saying “the wars we are seeing are driven by desperate geopolitical strategies around fossil resources.”

Activists participate in a demonstration during a conference aimed at transitioning away from fossil fuels Monday, April 27, 2026, in Santa Marta, Colombia. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia

Reducing reliance on fossil fuels a challenge

On the list of attendees are major fossil fuel producers Canada, Norway and Australia, and developing oil giants Nigeria, Angola and Brazil.

They join coal-reliant emerging markets Turkey and Vietnam, and small island nations extremely vulnerable to climate shocks, among others.

But the world's biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, including the United States, China and India, are not attending, nor are oil-rich Gulf states.

The conference is not expected to produce binding commitments but a set of proposals for countries wanting to gradually swap out fossil fuel production and consumption for cleaner forms of energy.

Activists participate in a demonstration during a conference aimed at transitioning away from fossil fuels Monday, April 27, 2026, in Santa Marta, Colombia. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia


This is a particular challenge for developing countries heavily reliant on oil and gas revenue, like hosts Colombia.

On Tuesday, France unveiled a fossil fuel "roadmap" setting deadlines to phase out coal by 2030, oil by 2045 and gas by 2050 for energy purposes.

Nations will discuss how to pursue these plans, as well as reforming fossil fuel subsidies that throw up barriers to renewable energy investment, among other issues.

Organizers say the conference is intended to build political momentum and bring together countries willing to accelerate the transition outside the formal UN process.

It is also seen as a steppingstone toward upcoming global climate negotiations, where financing and timelines for reducing fossil fuel use are expected to remain key points of debate.



EU backs ending new oil and gas drilling



By Marta Pacheco
Published on 

The war in the Middle East may have driven up oil and gas demand, but the world should still ditch new fossil fuel drilling, EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra has said, insisting on "affordable, reliable, homegrown clean energy."

The world should end new fossil fuel drilling, EU Climate Action Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has said, adding that global energy security depends on reducing oil and gas dependency.

Speaking on Tuesday at an international conference in Santa Marta, Colombia, aimed at quitting oil, gas and coal for good, the EU climate chief said that science-driven, measurable steps should be identified to support the transition from fossil fuels. "Science matters in climate change. And transitioning away from fossil fuels is a very tangible way to follow science," he said.

The First International Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels, gathering 60 countries, including some major oil producers, comes at a timely moment.

Global demand for oil and natural gas has surged in the wake of the US-led war against Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital trade passage. Nonetheless, the European Union insists that the long-term goal of clean power is more necessary than ever.

But as EU ministers scramble to secure supplies amid soaring energy prices, some countries are considering tapping their fossil fuel reserves for a rescue.

Even before the recent market disruptions, Greece issued its first offshore oil and gas exploration license in over four decades. Italy is also considering reviving offshore oil and gas exploration, which was suspended in 2019.

Rome and Berlin have also suggested a temporary return to coal to remedy soaring electricity prices.

However, Hoekstra said the clean energy transition remained the best long-term response. "We need to reduce our fossil fuel dependence for our energy security. We cannot be at the mercy of regimes holding up our resources," he said.

"As long as we rely on fossil fuels, we are vulnerable to volatility and external pressure. What is the answer? To double down on affordable, reliable, homegrown clean energy. To move faster towards a clean, electrified energy system. For climate, but also for security, resilience, competitiveness and independence."

Hoekstra called for a doubling of energy efficiency, a tripling of renewables by 2030 and more electrification to prevent vulnerabilities to price and supply shocks from global markets.

He also said that the annual United Nations COP climate meetings were not moving fast and far enough.

"We all know that the COP process is unfortunately not always delivering what it should. That means we need to improve that. But at the same time, we also need to ensure that we make the most of these plurilateral initiatives,” he said, as he thanked Brazil for tabling the initiative to transition away from fossil fuels at the COP30 last November.

Momentum for COP31

Denmark, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom are among the European nations represented in Santa Marta, a global conference that was planned long before the conflict in the Middle East.

Rachel Kyte, the UK’s Special Representative for Climate, said the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz had forced countries around the world to pivot to clean energy, adding that the UK is eager to "support those wishing to drive forward their transitions to clean and secure energy."

“We have the experience of our transition to share and the recent experience of driving to energy security with our clean power mission," Kyte told Euronews.

Spanish Energy and Environment Minister Sara Aagesen hailed the Santa Marta gathering as a “success” that will generate alliances and consensus to sustain the momentum leading up to COP31 in Turkey.

“Fossil fuel dependency makes us incredibly vulnerable,” Aagesen said. "We need to bet on this clean energy agenda. We have our own success story, which has allowed us to be less dependent and more shielded from energy spike prices."

Seeking consensus among oil producers

Several major oil-producing nations, including Canada, Norway, Brazil and Nigeria, are taking part in Santa Marta. Others, such as the United States and Russia, were not invited due to what Colombia’s Environment Minister Irene Vélez Torres described as “openly extractivist” positions.

China, the world’s largest consumer of coal and oil, was also barred, as its status as the top global emitter would make commitments to phasing out fossil fuels particularly challenging, Torres noted.

Torres said the countries gathered in Santa Marta were a "coalition of the willing" intended to bypass the gridlock often caused by major fossil-fuel producers in UN climate talks.

Climate researchers at the Santa Marta event presented scientific workshops, including on the potential impact on public health and jobs in a world no longer reliant on fossil fuel production and use.

While no major new initiatives are expected to emerge from the meeting, the goal is to identify collective actions that would be difficult to achieve individually.

"We are opening a new chapter of global political discussion which, naturally, won't solve all the challenges on a single conference," Torres told reporters. "What matters here is the declaration of what we're willing to do to end fossil fuel dependency."


Europe revives renewables and nuclear to address the energy crisis

EU energy mix
Copyright euronews

By Evi Kiorri & Mert Can Yilmaz
Published on 

Brussels is looking for a long-term fix, putting both renewables and nuclear back on the table after the Strait of Hormuz closure sent energy bills soaring. Watch the video!

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused energy prices to surge across Europe. Brussels states that the solution is to accelerate the permanent transition away from fossil fuels.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen put the cost bluntly on April 13: €22 billion in additional fossil fuel import bills in just 44 days since the US-Iran conflict began, with no extra energy to show for it.

She recommends expanding renewables and nuclear, which already provide over 70% of Europe's electricity. However, the Commission identifies key challenges: limited storage, outdated grids, and wasted clean power. Brussels is expediting its grid modernisation package for implementation this summer.

Nuclear energy has returned to the forefront of the debate, with 15 member states supporting it through the European Nuclear Alliance. There is also growing momentum to deploy Small Modular Reactors in the early 2030s.

On April 22, the Commission announced an emergency package that includes coordinated EU gas storage, joint oil reserve releases, household income support, and expedited flexible state aid rules.

This marks Europe's second major energy crisis in three years. Brussels says that the objective is not to manage future shocks, but to prevent them.

Brussels instructs EU countries to be tough on net-zero shipping goals at key IMO talks

 Cargo ship M/V Bavaria is assisted by tug boats as it prepares to dock at Subic port in Zambales province, northwestern Philippines on Thursday, May 30, 2019.
Copyright AP Photo / Aaron Favila
By Marta Pacheco
Published on 


The high-level talks come after a disastrous meeting in October, when a proposal to tax shipping emissions was blocked by the United States. Within the EU, Greece, Italy and Malta remain hesitant to support the proposal.

The European Union looks to enforce stricter limits on greenhouse gas emissions from ships during high-level talks in London this week, risking a fresh clash with the United States, which last October blocked a global tax on carbon emissions.\\\

The London-based International Maritime Organization (IMO) had hoped governments would back its “net-zero framework” for shipping, which would impose charges per metric ton of carbon dioxide emitted above certain limits.

However, the proposal was rejected during talks at the UN maritime body last autumn, with 57 countries voting in favour of a one-year delay, including the United States, Saudi Arabia and Russia.

While no vote is expected during the April round of talks, EU countries have been instructed to act together to support climate goals in line with international commitments and the bloc’s target of reaching climate neutrality by 2050, according to a letter seen by Euronews.

“Member states, on behalf of the Union, shall oppose any attempts to remove the IMO Net-Zero Framework,” the letter states.

IMO calls for ‘constructive talks’

IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez urged delegates to engage in constructive and pragmatic discussions, saying “there is no need to repeat what happened last October”, when US President Donald Trump blocked the vote, with several reports suggesting Washington pressured some countries over trade tariffs.

“Let us move forward where we agree and continue to work on areas where further effort and understanding are needed. At a time when there is already enough disagreement around the world, I ask that we set an example of effective multilateralism,” Dominguez said on 27 April.

Anaïs Rios, senior policy officer for shipping and climate at the NGO Seas at Risk, criticised the US Trump administration’s pushback against “any progress towards clean energy”, which she said has left many countries undecided.

“Progress is at risk of stalling amid continued opposition and delays to anything that could advance the framework towards decarbonising shipping, which was approved last year but has yet to be adopted,” said Rios, who is attending the IMO talks.

Defending and exporting domestic climate goals

The EU’s net-zero rules for shipping require a 2% cut in greenhouse gas emissions in 2025, rising to 6% in 2030 and gradually increasing to 80% by 2050 for ships above 5,000 gross tonnage.

While the bloc aims to defend its climate goals, it also intends to work closely with international partners through the IMO to develop global rather than regional solutions, the letter states, as international shipping accounts for around 2–3% of global emissions.

Brussels insists any final agreement must still meet the agreed target of net-zero emissions by 2050. However, it also stresses that the transition must preserve the competitiveness of Europe’s maritime sector and ensure a global level playing field.

The approach reflects an underlying tension, as the bloc risks placing its own industry at a disadvantage if other countries do not match its level of ambition.

A revised compromise text currently under discussion at the London talks has secured broad backing among EU countries, although Greece, Italy and Malta remain cautious, according to two EU diplomats.

Pricing shipping emissions

Countries voted in April 2025 on adopting a global framework to introduce a carbon price on shipping emissions, aimed at helping the industry decarbonise and encouraging cleaner technologies.

On 16 October 2025, a simple majority of 54 votes was required for adoption, but the proposal fell short, with 49 votes in favour.

The proposed IMO levy would range from $100 (€85) to $380 (€324) per metric ton, depending on various factors, and could generate between $30 billion (€26.51 billion) and $40 billion (€34.15 billion) by 2030, while delivering at least a 10% reduction in emissions from the sector, according to estimates from environmental organisations.

The carbon pricing mechanism would be paid by ship owners into a UN “Net Zero Fund”, which would be managed by the IMO and used to support green shipping innovation and reward low-emission vessels.

US President Donald Trump rejected the proposal, calling it a “global green new scam” and arguing it would drive up costs for American consumers.

How engaged are young Europeans in online civic and political life?



By Inês Trindade Pereira & video by Léa Becquet
Published on 

Online platforms are becoming the new political arena for Europe's youth. With their online engagement higher than in older groups, how do countries compare across the continent?

Young Europeans seem to be more politically active than their older counterparts.

In 2025, nearly one in four Europeans aged 16 to 29 said they engaged in civic or political issues online, according to the latest Eurostat figures.

This includes expressing their opinions on civic or political issues, participating in online consultations, or voting.

In comparison, slightly more than one-fifth of the overall population said they did the same sort of thing.

One of the main things that draws young Europeans to the web to express their political views appears to be its flexibility and ability to give a voice to all.

Young people see online spaces as a way of redefining participation as, in traditional offline settings, they only feel invited to "pre-determined spaces that rarely allow for equal influence, such as youth councils, forums, and summits", according to the European Partnership for Democracy (EPD).

"Rather than retreating from politics, young people are reimagining how democracy can function from the ground up," said Carlotta Magoga, research and programmes officer at the EPD.

Online civic or political participation among young people in 2025 was highest in Slovenia (49.4%), Latvia (33.3%) and the Netherlands (31.3%), according to Eurostat.

In contrast, the lowest shares were seen in Belgium (12.3%), Czechia (14.3%), Sweden and Greece (both 16.1%).

In 23 of the EU's 27 countries, young people were more likely to engage online than the overall population.

The largest gaps were recorded in Slovenia, with almost half of young people engaging online compared with slightly over one-third of the overall population.

This was followed by Latvia, with 33.3% of youth participating online compared with 24.2% of the general population, and Italy (30.9% vs 24.5%).

Only in Finland and Cyprus did the general population outpace the youth on political engagement, while in Luxembourg, Ireland, Croatia, and Malta, engagement was equal across age groups.

However, as democratic debate shifts online, experts warn that digital platforms are increasingly taking control of the political conversation, risking fragmented discourse and fuelling cynicism, distrust, and even rage-driven engagement.

Are there alternatives to mainstream social media platforms? |Euronews Tech Talks

Are there alternatives to mainstream social media platforms? |Euronews Tech Talks
Copyright Euronews and Canva


By Alice Carnevali
Published on 

Privacy, political, and ethical concerns are pushing people to look for alternative social media platforms. What are the options? Are they the solution? Euronews Tech Talks tries to understand.

Following Elon Musk’s acquisition of X (formerly known as Twitter) in October 2022, and his support for US President Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign, many users abandoned the platform over political and ethical concerns.

These developments revived a long-standing debate, already prominent during the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018: the trust relationship between users and the online platforms, and the need for new options.

But are there alternatives to mainstream social media platforms?

Apple podcast Spotify podcast Castbox podcast

Open-source and decentralised social media

Social media plays a crucial role in many people’s lives, yet some of the basic rules and definitions surrounding it remain blurry and difficult to grasp.

First, social media platforms are different from social networking sites. “The difference between a site and a platform is really the role of algorithms,” Michael Bossetta, associate professor of communication at Lund University, told Euronews Next.

“A social networking site, as many were in the early days, is really just facilitating communication between people, so you don’t really need an algorithm there,” he added.

Second, most social media platforms are built as closed-source software. “Closed source means that we don't know what is the technical operations underneath the platform, we don't know how it's working,” Bossetta said.

The codes of mainstream social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok are secret. However, there are other websites such as Mastodon, the European alternative to X, that are built on an open source structure.

In fact, anyone can download, modify, and install Mastodon on their server, and its code is publicly available.

In addition, Mastodon is built on a decentralised model. While on X, Facebook and Instagram, all users' interactions and content are managed by a single company, Mastodon operates through a distributed network of servers, where each server is an independent entity.

Open source platforms also face some difficulties: “The problem is that the user experience on these open source platforms is just not close to how major platforms like TikTok and Facebook operate,” Bossetta said.

In addition, moderation and regulation are difficult to implement on decentralised networks, as there’s not a single company managing the platform.

European social media: The experience of Monnett

Open source and decentralised platforms can serve as alternatives to the mainstream social media we are familiar with, as they challenge the widespread model on which these platforms are built.

Other alternatives also aim to challenge the geographical dominance of social media firms, most of which are based in the United States.

Among them is Monnett, a Luxembourgish company founded in 2025.

“Algorithms dictate our democracies, they dictate our societies, algorithms have become our dictators. And we need to build alternative social platforms that enable people to have agency again,” Christos Floros, founder and CEO of Monnett, told Euronews Next.

Monnett is similar to Instagram, but takes a step back to the social networking era. “The main promise that we make is that there's no algorithm,” Floros said, adding that when you sign up, you just see your friends.

Due to this structural difference, Monnett is not free, but rather built on a membership-type model, starting at €2.99 per month.

In addition, Monnett’s artificial intelligence (AI) policy is strict. “We don't want AI-generated content, and we also don't want to feed people's content into AI for moderation. So our goal is to have human moderation on the platform,” Floros said.

Do we need more made-in-Europe social media?

Monnett is not the only project working toward the construction of a European social media ecosystem.

The Danish NGO Rebuild, which counts former European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager as a patron, is trying to support this leap, connecting entrepreneurs with investors in the sector.

Yet, whether European social media can change the rules in the social media sector is highly debated.

According to Bossetta, the issue is not where a technology is created, but rather the priorities it sets.

“We have very talented, well-paid people who are spending their lives trying to get a couple of extra seconds of you on your phone rather than working towards solving some of the biggest challenges we face as a species, things like climate change,” he said.

Others, such as Sandra Wachter, professor of technology and regulation at the University of Oxford and the Hasso Plattner Institute in Potsdam, are more optimistic.

“If alternatives would pop up, then this could be like a unique point for other competitors to come into the market, which is one of the reasons why we have this Digital Markets Act, which is trying to revive healthy competition,” she said.

The Digital Markets Act is one of the multiple European Union (EU) regulations aiming at limiting the power of big social media platforms and, more generally, big tech firms.

This law entered into force in November 2022 and on 22 April was used by the European Commission to impose fines of €500 million on Apple and €200 million on Meta.

Wacther said regulations such as the DMA might not be perfect, but are important in shifting the balance of power in the social media environment.

“We don't have to fall into the trap of this ‘too big to fail’ narrative and to see them as demigods and tech giants whose power cannot be yielded anymore.

“I think that's a popular narrative that plays into their hands, but in reality, nobody is really above the law,” she said.

EU finds Meta violates digital rules by not doing enough to keep children off Instagram and Facebook

FILE - The Facebook logo is seen on a cell phone in Boston, USA, Oct. 14, 2022.
Copyright AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File

By Pascale Davies
Published on 

One in ten children under the age of 13 is using Facebook or Instagram, EU regulators say.

The European Commission has issued a preliminary finding against Meta for allegedly failing to prevent children under 13 from using Instagram and Facebook

The Commission said that its findings showed the US tech giant’s systems are in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA).

Meta’s own terms of service set 13 as the minimum age for both platforms, but the Commission said that the company's age enforcement measures are largely ineffective, as children can enter a false date of birth when signing up, with no mechanism in place to verify whether the information is accurate.

The Commission said that roughly 10-12% of children under 13 are using Instagram and Facebook, which contradicts Meta’s internal assessments. It also found that Meta “disregarded readily available scientific evidence,” indicating that younger children are particularly vulnerable to harms from services like Facebook and Instagram.

How has Meta responded?

Meta said in a statement to Euronews that it disagrees with these preliminary findings.

"We’re clear that Instagram and Facebook are intended for people aged 13 and older and we have measures in place to detect and remove accounts from anyone under that age," the Meta spokesperson said, adding that the company continues to invest in technologies to find and remove underage users.

The spokesperson said that the company will have more to share next week about "additional measures rolling out soon".

"Understanding age is an industry-wide challenge, which requires an industry-wide solution, and we will continue to engage constructively with the European Commission on this important issue,” they added.

The age verification challenge

The findings come as several EU states discuss plans to implement blanket social media bans for children under 15. However, age verification methods are a sticking point.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in April that a new age-verification app is technically ready and will be available for use soon, without stating the date.

Video. Should social media be banned for children? Euronews asks Europeans

On April 15, von der Leyen told social media platforms there were "no more excuses" for not protecting children online and announced that the EU's own age-verification app is technically ready for rollout.

Regulators are demanding that Meta overhaul its risk assessment methodology and significantly strengthen its measures to prevent, detect, and remove underage users from both platforms.

What happens next?

Meta now has the right to examine the Commission's investigation files and respond in writing to the findings

If the Commission's conclusions are ultimately confirmed, it can issue a formal non-compliance decision and impose a fine of up to 6% of Meta's total worldwide annual turnover, which could run into the billions of euros.