Monday, May 24, 2021

One year on from George Floyd's death and Scotland still has to face up to racism

Record View says racism, like sectarianism, is entwined around our society from sporting arenas to city streets.


By Record View
DAILY RECORD
SCOTLAND
22 MAY 2021

Hundreds of people gather at a Black Lives Matter protest in Glasgow Green in June (Image: Garry F McHarg Daily Record)

When George Floyd was killed on May 25, 2020 we all took notice.

The nine-minute, on-camera murder of a black man under the knee of a uniformed Minneapolis police officer shook the western world to its core.

George’s death, this time last year, sparked the Black Lives Matter ­movement and global protests against racism.

In America, that anger turned to burning violence in parts of a nation which was founded on slavery as much as the promise of freedom.

In the UK, slaver statues were torn down, in Scotland the historic meaning and wealth of Glasgow’s “tobacco merchants” and Highland landlordism was reassessed.


Black Lives Matter protest and George Floyd memorial at Glasgow Green 
(Image: Daily Record)

Sportsmen took the knee and the promise of change was in the air. Enough was enough.

As the sectarian brawling on the streets of Glasgow showed last week, some of us are too preoccupied with other ancient hatreds to get too het up about racism.

But racism, like sectarianism, is entwined around our sporting arenas.

The testimony of Mark Walters, the Rangers veteran reflecting on his arrival at Ibrox in the late 1980s, still shocks.

In a television documentary tracing the steps of Scotland’s first black ­international player, Andrew Watson, the Rangers star is staggered by his own memories.

Mark recalls the vile racist abuse he received as one of only a few black players to have starred in Scottish ­football.

Even coming from playing in England, where racist abuse was then ­commonplace, Mark was stunned by the venomous hatred shown towards him by rival fans, men and boys, in ­Scotland.

As Mark recollects, children aren’t born that way, they learn from their peers or their parents.

The game and Scotland have changed since then, or so we like to tell ourselves.

But the recent experience of another Rangers player, Glen Kamara, racially abused in a European fixture by another player, reminds us that the world has not changed that much at all.

A year on from the death of George Floyd, we must renew the pledge to challenge racist abuse in all its forms, on and off the field, and to ask ourselves what is so good about hating people we don’t even know


THE DAILY RECORD IS A SPORTING TABLOID LIKE THE SUN PAPERS



Loch Ness Monster register keeper says sightings are 'getting more credible all the time'

Gary Campbell has recorded more than 1130 alleged sightings of Nessie over 25 years, with six added to the books this year.




By Mike Merritt
24 MAY 2021

Gary Campbell is keeper of the Official Loch Ness Monster Register


After recording more than 1130 alleged ­sightings, the man who keeps a log on Nessie is celebrating 25 years of monster chasing – but admits the mystery may never be solved.

Gary ­Campbell, keeper of the Official Loch Ness Monster Register claims “the sightings are getting more credible all the time”.

He also said the ­fascination of Nessie is as strong as ever. The ­chartered ­accountant, 56, from ­Inverness, has already accepted six ­sightings this year – following 13 last year.

This photo taken at Loch Ness by Charlotte Robinson is rated one of the best by Gary

Gary stressed that the majority of claimed ­sightings do not get included. He said: “Anything that is later proved to be a hoax or can be subsequently explained is removed from the register. I never expected to be doing it this long but, after 25 years, nobody has solved the mystery – so I expect I will be doing it to the day I die. There have been three credible accounts which have really stood out over the years.

“Richard White, in 1997, who took a series of photos of something coming out of the water.

Richard White's alleged photo of Nessie is highly-rated by Gary

“Glasgow postman Bobbie Pollock who, in 2000, took a video of an object swimming in ­Invermoriston Bay. But the best picture was taken by a 12-year-old girl on holiday with her parents.”

Little Charlotte Robinson was visiting from ­Yorkshire in 2018, when Nessie popped up about 50ft away.

Gary added: “It has been a good start to the year already. I think this proves that Nessie’s not gone anywhere.”



SEE









Crunch time for cryptos: The Bitcoin crackdown is just beginning
23 May, 2021 


An advertisement for Bitcoin on a tram in Hong Kong. Photo / AP
Daily Telegraph UK


By: James Titcomb


OPINION:

Bill Clinton once quipped that China attempting to censor the internet would be like "trying to nail jello to the wall". Cyberspace, he said in 2000, existed outside of any jurisdiction. Freedom would come to China down the copper wire, whether Beijing liked it or not.

Today, Clinton's prediction sits in a long list of hopelessly optimistic forecasts about the web before most of its downsides were apparent.

Beijing did indeed nail jelly to the wall. Today, the Chinese internet is locked down, with sites that do not obey the Communist Party's strict censorship rules blocked to most internet users. Websites may exist outside of any one government's control, but people's access to them is a different matter.

Today, China's success in restricting the internet influences many other governments which are concerned about technologies that threaten to moderate their influence.

Brazil has at times ordered telecoms companies to block WhatsApp over its use of uncrackable end-to-end encryption. Last year, Turkey blocked several social networks after airstrikes in northern Syria. Widespread internet blackouts have become more common in recent years, often around elections and moments of political tension.

Most authorities are not nearly as effective as China, which has devoted huge resources to a multi-decade effort to shape the internet. But this has not stopped them trying - the web does not exist entirely independently.

What the internet was supposed to do for information, Bitcoin is now meant to do for money. The cryptocurrency's more zealous supporters (as opposed to the masses merely speculating on its price) argue that Bitcoin is free from government control, decentralised, and governed by the laws of mathematics and logic rather than the whims of central bankers or corrupt dictators.

On a fundamental level, they are correct. The blockchain network that maintains Bitcoin runs on thousands of computers around the world, a mesh of individual nodes with no one point that could fail. The number of virtual coins that can be created, as well as the rules around how they are made, is effectively set in stone. Absent an unlikely set of events in which one entity takes over half of the network, this will not change.

And despite the huge potential rewards from doing so (the total value of all Bitcoins in circulation is almost US$700 billion, about NZ$975b), nobody has come close to hacking the network.

 
President Xi Jinping at the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in May 2020. Both China and the US have shown they can knock Bitcoin's price with statements alone. Photo / AP

All this is what gives the cryptocurrency's backers confidence that Bitcoin represents a digital (and thus better) form of gold, a secure and dependable asset independent of the whims of world leaders.

But last week, even the cryptocurrency's staunchest backers may have felt a twinge of uncertainty about exactly how independent the technology is. Bitcoin fell by as much as 30 per cent on Wednesday, with other virtual currencies also dropping, after China's central bank told financial institutions not to deal in cryptocurrencies or take them as a form of payment.

After a slight recovery, digital coins dipped again the following day when the United States government demanded that cryptocurrency transactions worth more than US$10,000 be reported to combat concerns they are being used to avoid taxes.

Prices dropped further again on Friday, when Chinese authorities doubled down by promising to take action against "mining", the energy-intensive process by which new coins are created and transactions processed. Prices have now fallen more than 40 per cent in slightly over a month, from above US$63,000 in mid-April to as low as US$34,000 on Friday.

While the Bitcoin network remains as secure and resistant to government intervention as it was a week ago, the same cannot be said for its value. Both China and the US demonstrated an ability to knock Bitcoin's price with strongly worded statements alone. Actual action could take a far greater toll.

There are a host of other methods which governments could use to interfere in the ways Bitcoin interacts with the regulated financial system, from shutting down or restricting the exchanges where cryptocurrencies are bought, to taxing their sales, making ownership illegal or shutting down miners.

Companies and institutional investors - whose interest has been seen as partly responsible for the rise in Bitcoin's price over the past few months - could be pressured to step back.

None of this would technically stop people owning Bitcoin, but it could, in theory, make the currency much more difficult to use - or perhaps just as relevant, cause prices to swing to the extent that few will trust it as a store of value.

It should be said that this has been tried before. Many countries have attempted to shut down or limit use of cryptocurrencies without success. Indeed, such efforts may only serve to increase the supposed value of systems outside their control.

But if, as Bitcoin's champions argue, we are only at the start of the cryptocurrency's journey, we may also be in the early stages of governments attempting to limit it. Bitcoin may be where the Chinese internet was in 2000.

Governments may start to take a stronger line - perhaps due to growing concerns about its use in ransomware cyberattacks, or if they really do fear national currencies declining in importance in comparison.

Bitcoin's backers will say "bring it on", that each test the digital currency passes will make it stronger. They are likely to get what they wish for.