Thursday, August 14, 2025

ZIONIST ETHNIC CLEANSING IS FASCISM

Israeli minister announces settlement plan to 'bury the idea of a Palestinian state'

Israel’s far-right finance minister on Thursday announced plans to revive a contentious settlement plan in the occupied West Bank, which Palestinians and rights groups fear will scuttle plans for a future Palestinian state. The so-called E1 scheme linking Jerusalem and the Maale Adumim settlement has been frozen for decades amid international opposition, including from the US.


Issued on: 14/08/2025 
By: FRANCE 24
Video by: Noga TARNOPOLSKY


Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich gives a press conference on settlements expansion in the occupied West Bank on August 14, 2025. © Ronen Zvulun, Reuters
04:30



Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has approved plans for a settlement that would split East Jerusalem from the occupied West Bank, a move his office said would bury the idea of a Palestinian state.

It was not immediately clear if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backed the plan to revive the long-frozen E1 scheme, which Palestinians and world powers have said would effectively lop the West Bank in two and will likely draw international ire.

In a statement headlined "Burying the idea of a Palestinian state," Smotrich's spokesperson announced the decision and said the development would build 3,401 houses for Israeli settlers between an existing settlement in the West Bank and Jerusalem.

FRANCE 24 © 2025
07:00



Israel had frozen construction plans there since 2012 because of objections from the United States, European allies and other world powers who considered the project a threat to any future peace deal with the Palestinians.

Palestinians fear the settlement building in the West Bank – which has sharply intensified since the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that led to the Gaza war – will rob them of any chance to build a state of their own in the area.

Settler violence has skyrocketed, from destruction of olive groves and cutting water and electricity in communities like Susiya, to incendiary attacks on Christian holy sites.

There was no immediate statement from Netanyahu or the broader government. Smotrich's popularity has fallen in recent months with polls showing his party would not win a single seat if parliamentary elections were held today.

The Palestinian foreign ministry called the new settlement plan an extension of crimes of genocide, displacement and annexation, and an echo of Netanyahu's statements regarding what he called 'Greater Israel'. Israel has long rejected accusations of genocide and rights abuses and said it is acting in its own defence.

The E1 project would connect the Maale Adumim settlement in the West Bank with Jerusalem. Most of the international community views Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and its military occupation over the region since 1967, as illegal.

Peace Now, which tracks settlement activity in the West Bank, said that the housing ministry had approved the construction of 3,300 homes in Maale Adumim.

“The E1 plan is deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution. We are standing at the edge of an abyss, and the government is driving us forward at full speed," Peace Now said in a statement.
House building 'in a year'

Peace Now said there were still steps needed before construction, including the approval of Israel's High Planning Council. But if all went through, infrastructure work could begin within a few months, and house building in about a year.

Palestinians were already demoralised by the Israeli military campaign which has killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza, according to local health authorities, and fear Netanyahu will ultimately push them out of that territory.

President Donald Trump added to their anxiety by proposing the United States will take over Gaza, build an international beach resort and displace its residents to countries such as Egypt and Jordan.

About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in a move not recognised by most countries but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank.

The UN and most world powers say settlement expansion has eroded the viability of a two-state solution by fragmenting Palestinian territory.

Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the area, which it calls Judea and Samaria, and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security.

Most of the international community considers all settlements illegal under international law, a position backed by numerous UN Security Council resolutions, including one which called on Israel to halt all settlement activity.

Israel rejects this interpretation, saying the West Bank is "disputed" rather than occupied territory.

Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand imposed sanctions in June on Smotrich and another far-right minister who advocates for settlement expansion, accusing both of them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank

Britain and other states have said that Israel must stop expanding settlements in the West Bank. Over the past 22 months, as Israel has waged war in Gaza, rights groups have said settler attacks and settlement expansion in the West Bank have risen sharply.

(FRANCE 24 with Reuters)


'More important than our hostages': Israeli settlers back new Gaza plan

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new military plan for Gaza faces growing criticism abroad, opposition is also building in Israel, with hostage families calling for a nationwide shutdown on Sunday. 

But in the Israeli settlement of Itamar, in the occupied West Bank, support for the war remains firm.


From Jerusalem, Route 60 heads north through a landscape that tells the story of more than half a century of occupation of the West Bank – with its Israeli military presence and smooth roads for Israeli settlers, dotted with checkpoints on the roads serving Palestinian localities.

The hills are gradually being covered with "outposts" – prefabricated structures set up on the outskirts of Israeli settlements to gradually expand their boundaries.

While settlements are recognised by the Israeli government, outposts are illegal under Israeli law. Both the settlements and the outposts are illegal under international law.

Arriving at a yellow metal barrier, we are in Itamar, where small houses with light-coloured walls line the streets that wind their way along the hillside.

In Itamar, as in most Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, the majority of residents identify with the religious nationalist movement – and in particular with the Religious Zionist Party of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, whose portrait is seen on posters lining the roads in the region.

Residents refer to it as Judea and Samaria, the biblical name for this region and the one used for the West Bank by Israeli authorities. According to these settlers, this land belongs to Israel, even though United Nations resolutions say otherwise.

France leads global appeal to recognise Palestinian state after UN talks

'Reaching an agreement won't work'

In recent days, the streets of Israel have echoed with cries of anger over the government's plan to take control of densely populated areas of the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli military said on Wednesday it had approved the framework for a new offensive in Gaza, as Hamas condemned what it called "aggressive" Israeli ground incursions in Gaza City. The approval for the expanded offensive comes days after Israel’s security cabinet called for the seizure of Gaza’s largest city.

The families of the remaining 50 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza – 22 of whom are currently presumed to be alive – have called for a nationwide general strike on Sunday, in protest at the expansion of the Gaza offensive.

They are urging Israelis not to go to work that day, in order to pressurise the government into prioritising the rescue of the hostages. "We are shutting down the country to save the soldiers and the hostages," they said in a statement. 

But there is no such dissent in Itamar, and the desire to continue the war prevails.

"What happened on 7 October [2023] must not happen again," explains Yaacov Cohen, a rabbi and religious teacher who has lived in Itamar for four decades.

"That is the most important thing, more important than the fate of our unfortunate hostages. On the other side, we have the terrorists of Hamas, who have no faith and no law. Stopping the war and reaching an agreement will not work."

This rhetoric highlights a profound division within Israeli society, contrasting sharply with the slogans seen at weekly rallies, from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, calling for an end to the war to allow for the release of the hostages.

Hunger, disease and no escape: Gaza aid worker’s account of life under siege

Netanyahu insists the aim of his plan is to "put an end to Hamas". Ultra-nationalist ministers Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir say this plan is insufficient to achieve that.

"I agree with Bezalel Smotrich," says Moshe Goldschmidt, a former mayor of the Itamar settlement, who believes that his country is still exercising too much restraint in its war on Gaza, particularly the army.

"Some officers exercise command with old ideas: fearing international pressure, being cautious," he says. "But there is a new mindset in Israel. We will no longer be sheep going to the slaughterhouse. We must be strong, fight for good, defeat evil and when that is done, there will be peace and the world will be a much better place."

Goldschmidt categorically rejects the idea that there is a genocide taking place in the Gaza Strip, even though Israeli human rights organisations have recently joined the list of NGOs now using this term.

Macron warns Israel that Gaza occupation plan risks ‘war without end’

Recognition of the State of Palestine

On Monday, Australia became the latest country to announce that it would recognise the State of Palestine – joining France, the United Kingdom and Canada, among others.

While this diplomatic gesture will have no impact on the ground, the settlers of Itamar are outraged.

"Gaza was a sample of a Palestinian state, with Hamas at its head," says Goldschmidt. "This is what happens when you create a Palestinian state. Their goal is to eliminate Israel. There is no difference between Hamas and Mahmoud Abbas's Palestinian Authority, if you listen to them – they have the same mindset, that of radical Islam."

Leaders who are preparing to recognise a Palestinian state "should be ashamed", he added.

In Itamar, the settlers are convinced that Western countries are beholden to the Muslim communities living in them, and that this explains why they are recognising Palestinian statehood.

As for Israel's growing isolation on the world stage: "yes, it's a problem," admits Cohen. "But we have the Americans with us, which helps a lot."


This article was adapted from the original version in French by RFI's correspondent in Itamar.

International aid groups say new Israeli rules stop them delivering supplies to Gaza


More than 100 international non-government organisations released a joint statement Thursday saying that the Israeli government was increasingly using new regulations to prevent them bringing much-needed humanitarian aid into the devastated Gaza Strip.


Issued on: 14/08/2025 -
By: FRANCE 24


Palestinians gather to receive cooked meals from a food distribution 
center in Gaza City on August 13, 2025. © Omar al-Qattaa, AFP

New Israeli legislation regulating foreign aid groups has been increasingly used to deny their requests to bring supplies into Gaza, according to a joint letter signed by more than 100 groups published Thursday.

"Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid'," the joint statement reads.

According to the letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone.

In March, Israel's government approved a new set of rules for foreign non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with Palestinians.

Gaza: families struggle to procure food as the humanitarian disaster worsens

© France 24
01:22


The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked.

Registration can be rejected if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the "democratic character" of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country.

"Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity," Israel's Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli alleged to AFP.

"Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate," added Chikli, whose ministry directed an effort to produce the new guideline.

Aid groups say, however, that the new rules are leaving Gazans without help.

"Our mandate is to save lives, but due to the registration restrictions civilians are being left without the food, medicine and protection they urgently need," said Jolien Veldwijk, director of the charity CARE in the Palestinian territories.

Eight more people, including three children, have died of starvation and malnutrition in Gaza in the past 24 hours, the territory's health ministry said Wednesday. The number of people who have died from hunger in the besieged enclave since the war began now stands at 235, including 106 children.

Veldwijk said that CARE has not been able to deliver any aid to Gaza since Israel imposed a full blockade on the Palestinian territory in March, despite partially easing it in May.


EXCLUSIVE: Former Gaza Humanitarian Foundation contractor speaks out to FRANCE 24
© France 24
05:13


Although Israel has alleged that much of the aid arriving in the territory is being siphoned off by Hamas, which runs Gaza, the UN has repeatedly rejected these claims.

An internal US government analysis seen by Reuters found no evidence of systematic theft by the Palestinian militant group of US-funded humanitarian supplies, and Israeli military officials have told the New York Times that they had no evidence to substantiate these allegations.

Since May, the government has relied on the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to manage food distribution centres. Israeli troops have shot dead hundreds of Palestinians trying to reach the aid hubs since they first opened, including at least 25 people on Wednesday.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP and Reuters)

 

Kneecap banned in Hungary but vow to use their platform to call out ‘genocide and the war criminals’

Kneecap banned in Hungary but vow to use their platform to call out ‘genocide and the war criminals’
Copyright AP Photo

By David Mouriquand & Magyar Ádám
Published on 

The Irish rap trio Kneecap would have graced the stage at this year's Sziget festival today had the Hungarian government had not banned the band from the country. Regardless, the band continues to tour and have vowed to keep using their platform to call out 'genocide and war criminals'.

This summer has seen Irish rappers Kneecap dropped from a number of line-ups, including Germany’s Hurricane and Southside festivals, as well as being slapped with a three-year ban from Hungary ahead of their planned performance at Sziget – where the band would have played tonight. 

“It is important to say that Hungary is an island of freedom and peace in a troubled world. Here, no one can be abused because of their origin or religion, even verbally. The organizers could have been wise enough not to invite them and not put Hungary in such a situation.” 

These were the words of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, referring to Kneecap’s ban. Orbán also labelled Kneecap as “anti-Semitic”, with the Hungarian government stating that the band’s statements cannot be protected by artistic freedom or freedom of expression.


Kneecap won't be at Sziget - despite what the programme states Euronew

The band has denied accusations of anti-Semitism, claiming that those attacking the band “weaponize” the false accusation to “distract, confuse, and provide cover for genocide.”

Kneecap has not been deterred and has frequently used their platform at various music festivals to speak out not against the Jewish people but against Israel's war in Gaza.

They did so at Coachella – where they denounced the US government’s funding of “war criminal Israel”; at Best Kept Secret - where the pre-show screening denounces the “Israeli genocide and the Western media's cover-up"; at Glastonbury – where their controversial set alongside Bob Vylan launched a police investigation; and most recently during their set at Øyafestivalen in Oslo.  

Indeed, the band criticised the Norwegian government ahead of their performance at the festival last Friday (8 August), displaying a message on the video screen that accused the Norwegian government of “enabling” the “genocide” in Gaza through the country’s “oil pension fund”. 

Kneecap were referring to the Government Pension Fund of Norway, which invests surplus revenues from the country’s petroleum industry and has a reported €1.6trillion in assets. 

The fund has faced controversy after a recent report from Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten found it had invested around €13million in Bet Shemesh Engines Ltd. – a jet engines parts manufacturer supplying the Israeli military – between 2023-2024. 

In the wake of the report, the Norwegian government has launched a review of the fund to ensure that it is not investing in Israeli companies contributing to the war in Gaza. Norway has also recognised Palestine as a state. 

“Over 80,000 people have been murdered by Israel in 21 months,” Kneecap’s message continued. “Free Palestine.” 

During their Oslo performance, Kneecap could be heard on stage saying: “The fact is, as long as we’re on stage and as long as nothing is changing, Kneecap will always use this platform and this stage to call out the genocide and the war criminals. I don’t need to lecture you people when your oil fund is being used to fund the genocide.” 

Band member Mo Chara also gave a “quick shout-out” to Øyafestivalen for “standing by Kneecap” despite calls for them to be removed from the line-up.

Not every festival stands by Kneecap’s freedom of expression, as evidenced by the recent news that the band’s upcoming gig in Vienna on 1 September has been cancelled “due to acute safety concerns”, following political pressure from Austria’s far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ). 

However, and despite the ban, Sziget tried to defend Kneecap's performance for as long as it could. The organisers' position was to condemn hate speech, but to guarantee all performers the right to artistic expression. 

A statement from Sziget also mentions that they have been in close contact with members of Kneecap, who assured them that their show would not violate Hungarian law or Sziget's principles. Still, the Hungarian government's decision means that fans will be left wanting. 

Festival director Tamás Kádár called the ban on Kneecap an unprecedented, unnecessary and regrettable move that will damage Sziget and Hungary's international image.  

Kádár told Euronews Culture at a press briefing on Day Zero that many in the pop scene were deeply shocked by what had happened, and that he believed the issue went far beyond Kneecap.  

"I think that this is not about the band, but about the world's attitude to culture in general, or politics' attitude to culture,” Kádár said, adding: “Or rather, the fact that recently, politics and war have entered the cultural life of the day. And it seems that not all politicians know what to do with that." 

Conversely, audiences do know what to do, as many were heard chanting "dirty Fidesz" (Orbán’s national-conservative party) and several Free Palestine flags were seen during the opening day of Sziget festival.

Free Palestine flags seen at Sziget festival in Hungary Euronews

While Hungarian audiences have been deprived of Kneecap, many other festivals are sticking with the band – including the upcoming Green Man Festival in Wales. The band has more than forty concerts remaining on its calendar for this year – including dates in Sweden, Norway, Finland, France and Belgium – and then a US leg which kicks off in October.  

Since Hamas’ attack on Israeli citizens on October 7, 2023, multiple UN human rights experts have stated that Israel’s military actions in Gaza amount to genocide, with the International Court of Justice finding claims of genocide plausible.

Israel has rejected the genocide accusations and maintain that its operations are lawful acts of self-defence. Claims Kneecap have vocally rebuked. And will continue to do so.

Trump and Putin to meet for Ukraine war talks where 'Ice Curtain' once fell

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska on Friday for talks on ending the war in Ukraine, and to revive their diplomatic and economic ties. It's a first-of-a-kind summit in a location loaded with history, symbolism and strategic importance.

While Trump told reporters on Monday that he was “going to Russia on Friday" to meet with Putin, Alaska has been part of the United States since 1867 – when Russia sold it for $7.2 million.

The US state lies just 53 miles from Russia across the Bering Strait at its narrowest point, between Russia's Chukchi Peninsula and Alaska's Seward Peninsula. There is a 21-hour time difference because the International Date Line runs through the strait.

The talks will mark the first visit by a Russian leader to Alaska and Putin’s first trip to the US since 2015. The location avoids legal and logistical obstacles.

The US is not a member of the International Criminal Court, which in 2023 issued a warrant for Putin on accusations of war crimes. This means Washington has no legal obligation to arrest him. Putin can also travel to Alaska without crossing other nations’ airspace.

EU says Ukraine must 'decide its own future' ahead of Trump-Putin summit

From colony to cooperation

The choice of Alaska also recalls the long history between the two countries.

Working for Russia, 18th century Danish explorer Vitus Bering discovered the strait separating Asia from the Americas that now bears his name.

Russian merchants capitalised on Alaska's fur trade, reselling furs bought from indigenous hunters at vast profit through the Russian-American Company, which ran a trading colony on the territory.

However, in 1867, Tsar Alexander II sold the territory to Washington for $7.2 million, following Russia's defeat in the Crimean War, which had left it with enormous debts. 

The deal was criticised in both countries: Americans saw it as a useless frozen wasteland, while some Russians said the price was too low – especially when Alaska was subsequently found to contain vast deposits of gold, copper and other valuable minerals.

Alaska became important in military cooperation after both the US and the Soviet Union entered the Second World War in 1941, serving as a route for US-built aircraft and supplies to Russia.

The territory played a vital role in military cooperation after both the US and the Soviet Union entered World War II in 1941, serving as a route for the transfer of US-built aircraft and other supplies to Russian territory.

During the Cold War its proximity to Russia made it a strategic frontline. Locals nicknamed the closed border the "Ice Curtain".

US summit in Alaska a 'personal victory' for Putin, Zelensky says

Traces of Russian culture

Alaska officially became the 49th US state in January 1959, but traces of its Russian history remain – most visibly in the Russian Orthodox churches that dot the territory.

While, according to the US census, only 1.4 percent of Alaska's population of just over 740,000 – amounting to around 10,360 people – have Russian heritage, the state's Russian Orthodox diocese had around 30,000 members as of 2006, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The community is served by 35 churches, with their distinctive domes, established during the Russian-American Company era, as well as a seminary on Kodiak Island. The religion remains the main legacy of the Russian colonial period

Although most Russians returned to Russia after Alaska was sold, the church had by then become a way of life in the region, integrated into local traditions.

As Richard Dauenhauer, a professor of native languages and culture at the University of Alaska Southeast told the Los Angeles Times: "It’s very easy to stereotype missionaries as having imposed a completely foreign religion on natives here. But there was actually a lot of synthesis of orthodoxy with the Aleutian [indigenous] culture. A lot of what happened in the native tradition was baptised into the church."

One congregant, Eleanor Tomaganuk, told the American daily: "We were brought up this way. There’s very much a feeling that this is our church."

Russian surnames too are common, even among those with no Russian ancestry – another legacy of the period of colonialism, during which names were assigned to Alaskan natives – and a Russian dialect is still spoken in some communities.

Alaskan Russian has two distinct varieties, both influenced by local Alaskan languages – Kodiak Russian and Ninilchik Russian – although today it is on the verge of extinction, with most speakers over the age of 75.

'Alaska is ours!'

After the collapse of the USSR, Alaska was the subject of nostalgia for Russians. A 1992 song by the band Lyube included the line: “Don’t play the fool, America... give back our dear little Alaska.”

The band has reportedly begun performing the song again recently, as some pro-Putin nationalists call for Alaska’s return.

United 24, the Ukrainian government's media and fundraising platform, highlighted recent Russian propaganda around ownership of the territory in a social media post.

Examples include a billboard proclaiming "Alaska is ours!", a military patch that shows Alaska as part of Russian territory, the music video for Lyube's song (which features images of Alaska being detached from the American continent by cannon fire), and a children's choir performing a song saying "we'll return Alaska to the motherland's harbour".

In December 2024, Newsweek reported that Russian TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov, a close ally of Putin, had said on a Russian state media programme that Finland, Warsaw, the Baltics, Moldova and Alaska should be "returned to the Russian empire".

Commenting on the setting for Friday's talks, former US ambassador to Russia and professor of political science at Stanford University, Michael McFaul, posted on X: "Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian empire. Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected."

Macron says he is in Greenland to express 'France and EU's solidarity'

Sam Greene, a professor of Russian politics at King’s College London, posted on the same platform: "The symbolism of holding the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska is horrendous – as though designed to demonstrate that borders can change, land can be bought and sold.

Two days later, Trump said at Monday's press conference: “There’ll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine. Good stuff, not bad stuff. Also, some bad stuff for both.”

He went on to describe the summit as a "feel-out meeting" to hear what Putin "has in mind" about ending the war in Ukraine, adding: "I may say – lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal."


This article was partially adapted from this article by RFI's French service.


Trump-Putin talks: Is Russia really contesting US sovereignty over Alaska?


Copyright James POULSON /AP

By Mared Gwyn Jones
Published on 14/08/2025 -


As the Russian and US presidents prepare to meet in the Alaskan capital, speculation that Vladimir Putin rejects the legitimacy of Russia’s 1867 sale of Alaska to the US has resurfaced online.

United States President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet face-to-face in a remote army base in the Alaskan capital of Anchorage on Friday for much-anticipated talks on Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The choice of venue is practical. Mainland Alaska and Russia are just 90 kilometres apart, while Alaska's Little Diomede Island lies fewer than 4 kilometres from Russia's Big Diomede Island in the Bering Strait.

It means Putin will be able to travel for talks while avoiding the airspace of Western countries that could attempt to intercept his flight to enforce the arrest warrant of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

But the venue is not only practical, it’s also symbolic. Alaska was once a fully-fledged Russian colony.

In 1867, Russia’s Tsar Alexander II sold Alaska to the US for $7.2 million, to help pay back high debts accrued during the Crimean war of 1853-185

For the Kremlin, Alaska was not considered an economically significant part of its territory.

With this check, the United States completed the purchase of almost 600,000 square miles of land from the Russian Government. Wikicommons

Alaska was officially proclaimed the 49th US state in 1949, and is now the largest of the US’ current 50 states.

Putin will be the first Russian president to visit Anchorage.

Choice of venue re-ignites imperialist narratives

The Anchorage summit has reignited narratives that hail Alaska a “historical” Russian land, with prominent Kremlin officials and allies quick to highlight the territory’s Russian heritage and history.

The theory that Russia will one day re-claim the US state as its own is not new, and has been peddled by several prominent Kremlin officials and allies in the past.

Last year, Russian state TV propagandist Olga Skabeyeva referred to the US territory as “our Alaska”

Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, has joked on social media about going to war with the US over the territory.

Kirill Dmitriev, a top Kremlin negotiator who also heads the Russian Direct Investment Fund, said last week that Alaska was a “Russian American” and suggested the summit could trigger closer cooperation between Moscow and Washington in the Arctic.

A 2022 billboard carrying the message “Alaska is ours”, which at that time sparked outrage among some US senators, has also resurfaced.

No publicly available evidence Moscow has nullified 1867 sale of Alaska

Speculation that Moscow is taking steps to regain the territory is also circulating widely.

That speculation has been fuelled by Trump appearing to confuse Alaska for Russia in a press conference on Monday, when he said he would travel to “Russia” to meet Putin despite having already confirmed Alaska as the venue.

Some social media users have suggested that a 2022 Russian Supreme Court ruling nullified the 1867 sale of Alaska to the US.

But Euroverify couldn’t find any official court document to corroborate that claim.

Other users have referenced a 2024 decree that purportedly declared the 1867 sale of Alaska illegal.

That decree does exist. It’s dated 18 January 2024 and allocates funds for the search, registration, and legal protection of Russia’s historic overseas assets.

We verified its contents and found it makes no reference to Alaska or any of Russia’s historical claims to the territory. Analysts however do believe that the Kremlin could use the decree to re-open historical disputes, not only in Alaska but also in former Russian territories.




Russia makes biggest 24-hour advance in


Eastern Ukraine ahead of Alaska summit

The Russian offensive in eastern Ukraine made major advances Wednesday as European leaders held online talks with US President Donald Trump ahead of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Just days ahead of the Alaska summit, Russia made its biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in over a year, according to data from a US research group.



Issued on: 13/08/2025 - 
By: FRANCE 24
Video by:Philip TURLE 


A woman walks past a heavily damaged residential building following a Russian strike in Bilozerske, Donetsk region, August 12, 2025. © Genya Savilov, AFP
02:40


The Russian army this week made its biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in over a year just days ahead of a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, according to data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War.

The Russian army took or claimed 110 square kilometres (42.5 square miles) on August 12 compared to the previous day, according to AFP analysis of battlefield data from the Institute for the Study of War.

It was the biggest advance since late May 2024.


In recent months, Moscow has typically taken five or six days to progress at such a pace, although Russian advances have accelerated in recent weeks.

Russia – which currently has full or partial control over 19 percent of Ukrainian territory – said Wednesday that it had taken two villages close to Dobropillia.

Donetsk governor Vadym Filashkin said the region was beginning the mandatory evacuation of families with children from the town of Bilozerske and a dozen other settlements.

"We are beginning the mandatory evacuation of families with children from the town of Bilozerske," Filashkin said, adding that around 1,150 children remained in the area impacted by the order.

Russia's offensive in eastern Ukraine was gaining speed and seizing ground Wednesday as European leaders held online talks with Trump ahead of his Alaska summit.


Russian military push comes ahead of Trump-Putin summit
© France 24
01:25



'New offensive operations'


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged Tuesday that Russian troops had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, but said that Kyiv would soon "destroy them".

"We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," he said.

Read more Ukraine acknowledges new and speedy Russian gains

The Russian military also fired at least 49 drones and two ballistic missiles at Ukraine during the night, the Ukrainian air force said.

At least three people were killed in Russian artillery and drone attacks on the southern Kherson region, according to regional officials.

Artem, a 30-year-old serviceman in Kramatorsk, said the war would likely continue for "a long time".

"Putin is massing an army, his army is growing, he is stockpiling weapons, he is pulling the wool over our eyes," he said.


Pokrovsk in Russian sights ahead of Alaska summit

Russian forces on the ground in Ukraine have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk, in the eastern Donbas region, which is part of Ukraine’s industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted.

Military analysts using open-source information to monitor the battles have said Ukraine's ability to fend off those advances could be critical: Losing Pokrovsk would hand Russia an important victory ahead of the summit and could complicate Ukrainian supply lines to the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces struck an oil pumping station in Russia’s Bryansk region overnight on Wednesday, according to a statement from Ukraine’s General Staff.

Ukrainian drones struck the Unecha station which supplies the Russian army, the statement said, adding that damage and a large fire was reported in the area around the pumping station.

Unecha transports oil to two pipelines with an annual capacity to pump 60 million tons. The operation was carried out by units of the Unmanned Systems Forces of Ukraine’s army and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Defense Ministry, the statement said.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP and AP)