Thursday, August 14, 2025

 

Green high-yield and high-efficiency technology: a new path balancing yield and ecology




Higher Education Press

Image 

image: 

Image

view more 

Credit: Jian HUANG , Yixiao CHAI , Shichao YANG , Yiwen CAO , Lei YANG , Min WANG , Xusheng MENG , Shiwei GUO




As a staple food for more than half of the global population, the high and stable yield of rice is directly related to food security. As the world’s largest rice producer, China has increased rice yield per unit through intensive fertilization and flood irrigation, but this model has also brought problems such as soil degradation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. How to ensure food supply while breaking through resource and environmental constraints?

Xusheng Meng and colleagues from Nanjing Agricultural University proposed a green, high-yield, and high-efficiency rice technology system in a review study, providing a solution to this problem. The related paper has been published in Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering (DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2025636).

Currently, China’s rice production is facing the dilemma of “high input and low efficiency”. Data shows that China accounts for 20% of the global rice planting area but consumes 37% of the nitrogen fertilizer, with nitrogen use efficiency lower than the world average. Excessive nitrogen fertilizer enters the environment through farmland runoff, leaching, and volatilization, leading to soil acidification and compaction, and exacerbating lake eutrophication and air pollution. At the same time, traditional flooded cultivation makes paddy fields an important source of greenhouse gas emissions. China’s paddy fields emit 712 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalents annually, higher than other major rice-producing countries.

In response to these challenges, researchers proposed three innovative technical paths based on experimental data from multiple regions across the country. The first is to optimize nutrient management strategies, balancing the rice population structure through the fertilization method of “reducing basal-tillering fertilizer and increasing panicle fertilizer”. In traditional cultivation, farmers tend to apply a large amount of fertilizer at the seedling stage to promote tillering, but excessive tillering easily leads to an increase in ineffective panicles and the risk of lodging. The new strategy precisely adjusts the proportion of nitrogen fertilizer allocated in different growth stages, which can not only promote effective tillering but also improve the development quality of panicles and grains in the later stage. Experiments show that this can increase nitrogen use efficiency by 8.1%–21.3%.

The second is the “carbon-nitrogen synergy” technology for improving soil fertility. The study found that combining crushed straw returning with organic fertilizer replacing part of chemical fertilizer can significantly increase soil organic carbon content and enhance the soil’s ability to retain water and nutrients. Long-term experiments show that this model can reduce ammonia volatilization loss by more than 17%, while activating the activity of functional microorganisms such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, and promoting nutrient conversion efficiency.

The third is the integrated water management technology of “water-saving and controlled drainage”. Different from the traditional full-period flooding, the “alternate wetting and drying” irrigation mode improves soil aeration, promotes root development, and reduces methane emissions by properly drying the fields in the late tillering stage. Demonstrations in the double-cropping rice areas of South China show that this technology can save 19% of water compared with conventional irrigation, reduce methane emissions by 16.2%, and keep the yield stable.

Researchers also proposed differentiated technical schemes according to the regional characteristics of China’s five major rice-growing regions. For example, in the Northeast region, nitrogen-zinc synergistic fertilization technology is used to solve the problem of seedling stunting caused by low temperature in early spring; in the mountainous areas of Southwest China, technologies such as sparse planting for strong plants and deep application of organic fertilizer are promoted to cope with topographical constraints; in the arid regions of Northwest China, film mulching hole sowing combined with controlled-release fertilizer is adopted to achieve water-saving and high yield. These technology combinations have achieved comprehensive benefits of increasing yield per mu by 6.3%–15.7% in different regions in demonstrations in Jiangsu, Northeast China, South China, etc.

The implementation of technology is inseparable from policy support and farmers’ participation. Through the “Science and Technology Courtyard” model, researchers have transformed complex technical parameters into simple operation standards such as the “three-looking fertilization method” (looking at seedling condition, soil, and weather), accelerating the large-scale application of green technologies. In the future, with the promotion of these technologies, it is expected to improve the nitrogen use efficiency of rice in China, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields, and contribute to ensuring food security and sustainable agricultural development.

How can green technology achieve a win-win for increased food production and environmental protection?




Higher Education Press
Image 

image: 

Image

view more 

Credit: Wen-Feng CONG‡ , Hao YING‡ , Feiyu YING , Zhichao AN , Jianbo SHEN , Fusuo ZHANG





As the most populous country in the world, China feeds 19.1% of the global population with only 8.6% of the world’s arable land. This achievement has been built on a long-standing agricultural model that heavily relies on high fertilizer inputs—China accounts for 32% of global nitrogen fertilizer use, far exceeding that of most countries. However, this “high input, high output” approach has raised concerns: excessive fertilization has led to soil acidification, nitrate pollution in water bodies, PM2.5 emissions, and other environmental issues, which in turn restrict agricultural sustainability. The challenge is how to ensure food security while reducing environmental costs—a common dilemma faced by global agriculture.

Recently, Professor Wenfeng Cong et al. from China Agricultural University proposed a solution called “green technology”, validated through over 12,000 field comparison trials conducted via a nationwide collaborative network. This research not only addresses the aforementioned challenges but also introduces a novel agricultural research paradigm—the “12345” model. This model emphasizes starting from actual production needs and resolving the dual contradictions between high yield and environmental protection, as well as economic growth and ecological preservation, through multidisciplinary collaboration and participation from multiple stakeholders. The relevant paper has been published in Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering (DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2025630).

The core of “green technology” is to optimize the “soil-crop-microbe” system to achieve a synergy of “high yield, high efficiency, and low pollution”. Specifically, it includes three key directions. First, constructing high-yield populations by breeding dense-tolerant varieties, adjusting planting densities, or promoting intercropping systems like corn and fava beans to fully utilize light and heat resources. Second, enhancing efficient rhizosphere regulation by using smart fertilizers that precisely match the nutrient needs of crops at different growth stages, or utilizing ammonium nitrogen to promote root growth and phosphorus uptake, thereby improving fertilizer utilization rates. Third, cultivating healthy soils through methods such as combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers and no-till practices to improve soil structure and microbial diversity, providing a foundation for high yields.

What are the effects of this technology? The research team integrated annual field trial data from 12,403 sites conducted between 2005 and 2020 through the national collaborative network. The results showed that compared to conventional farming practices, green technology increased food production by 21%–87% without significantly increasing nitrogen fertilizer inputs, improved nitrogen utilization efficiency by 24%–32%, and reduced nitrogen loss and greenhouse gas emission densities by 50%–56% and 31%–47%, respectively. By 2015, approximately 20.9 million farming households across 452 counties had adopted this technology, covering an arable area of 40 million hectares.

The paper notes that in the context of rising fossil fuel costs, future increases in food production can no longer rely on “piling on” chemical fertilizers; instead, they must achieve “less input, more output, and low pollution” through enhanced efficiency. China’s practices demonstrate that this goal is entirely feasible—if green technology is widely adopted, the impact of Chinese agriculture on global resource consumption, nitrogen and phosphorus loss, and greenhouse gas emissions will be significantly reduced, while also contributing to the achievement of multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

From theoretical paradigms to farmer practices, this research not only provides a viable pathway for resolving the contradiction between “high yield and environmental protection” but also serves as a reference model for other countries aiming for a green transformation in agriculture through the application of green technology.

How to grow more food with fewer resources?




Higher Education Press
Image 

image: 

Image

view more 

Credit: Fulin ZHAO1 , Xingbang WANG1 , Wushuai ZHANG1 , Peng HOU2 , Qingfeng MENG3 , Zhenling CUI4,5 , Xinping CHEN1,4





Global agriculture is facing a dual challenge: ensuring food security for a growing population while reducing the environmental costs associated with production. As a major agricultural country, China has long relied on a resource-intensive model for food production. While this approach has addressed the issue of food sufficiency, it has also led to increased greenhouse gas emissions, soil degradation, and water body eutrophication. Data shows that in 2019, nearly 70% of China's farmland was classified as low to medium productivity. Thus, achieving a green transformation while ensuring food security has become a critical issue in the agricultural sector.

Recently, Associate Professor Wushuang Zhang et al. from Southwest University, China Agricultural University, and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences systematically reviewed the practices and achievements of green technology innovations in major food crops from 2000 to 2022. They aimed to answer the question: how can China’s agriculture achieve a balance between “high yield” and “high efficiency” amid increasing resource constraints? The related paper has been published in Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering (DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2025633).

Over the past 20 years, China’s food production has delivered impressive “green results”. Statistics indicate that, by 2022, the total output of the three major staple crops (rice, wheat, and corn) had increased by 58% compared to 2000, with corn experiencing a remarkable 162% increase. During the same period, the planted area only expanded by 8.6%, with the increase in production primarily driven by improvements in yield per unit area. Specifically, the yield per unit area for wheat rose by 56.7%, corn by 40%, and rice by 12.9%. Even more noteworthy is the improvement in resource efficiency. Fertilizer application peaked in 2016 and decreased by 0.83 million tons by 2022, including a 9.4% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use. Nitrogen utilization efficiency improved from 27.5% in 2000 to 41.3% in 2022, meaning that more food was produced with less fertilizer.

Behind these changes are a series of breakthroughs in green technologies. For instance, the “Integrated Soil-Crop System Management (ISSM)” technology optimizes variety selection, sowing time, and planting density to enhance both light energy utilization and nutrient supply efficiency. Research shows that after applying this technology in North China, corn yields increased by 91.2% compared to traditional planting methods, while also reducing active nitrogen loss by 30% and greenhouse gas emissions by 11%. Another example is the “Root Zone Nutrient Regulation Technology”, which precisely matches the nitrogen needs of crops at different growth stages, resulting in an 8% increase in corn yield while reducing nitrogen fertilizer use by 25%. The “Rhizosphere Nutrient Regulation Technology” focuses on the smaller-scale root zone environment, optimizing fertilizer application locations and microbial interactions, leading to a 20.2% increase in rice yield and a 20%–30% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use.

However, challenges remain significant. With population growth and the development of animal husbandry, China’s demand for food, especially corn, is expected to continue rising, with total corn demand projected to increase by 30% by 2050. At the same time, issues of nitrogen and phosphorus surplus in farmland are prominent, and the utilization rate of organic resources remains low, with much potential yet to be unlocked.

To address these challenges, the researchers proposed four major strategies: (1) precision management of organic resources; (2) promotion of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers; (3) promotion and adoption rhizosphere nutrient regulation technology; and (4) new technologies such as intelligent nutrient management.

The researchers also predicts that if “Integrated Soil-Crop System Management” is fully implemented, China’s total output of rice, wheat, and corn could increase by 45.8 million tons, 115 million tons, and 360 million tons, respectively, by 2050, significantly reducing environmental costs while ensuring food security.

'A disaster': Russia’s Africa Corps suffers its first defeat in Mali

Analysis


At least three Russian fighters died when a convoy of the Russian paramilitary group Africa Corps was caught in a jihadist ambush on August 1 near Ténenkou in the Mopti region of Mali. Members of the jihadist group JNIM filmed grisly footage of the dead Africa Corps combatants. They are the first images of deceased Russian soldiers to have emerged from the region since Africa Corps took over from the private Russian group Wagner in Mali in June.


Issued on: 13/08/2025 - 
By: The FRANCE 24 Observers/
Guillaume MAURICE
The images at left and centre are stills taken from videos filmed by jihadists from the JNIM group on August 1, 2025 that show the lifeless bodies of at least three members of Russia's Africa Corps unit. The videos were filmed after the jihadists ambushed a Russian convoy near Ténenkou in northern Mali. At right is a still from a video that shows the retaliation carried out by a Russian helicopter on August 2.
 © Whatsapp/Telegram/Observers


The videos filmed on August 1 by fighters with Jama'at Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda affiliate in the Sahel region, are difficult to watch. The first shows bodies of men in uniform, including three of European descent, arrayed near a military truck. The rattle of automatic gunfire can be heard in the background of all these videos. The videos were first shared on jihadist WhatsApp channels before they were picked up and posted on X.

At several points in the videos, you can hear the jihadists refer to the dead men as “Wagner”. Wagner, the private paramilitary company founded by the late Yevgeny Prigozhin, announced that it was ending its Mali operations on June 6, 2025. The Russian group Africa Corps has taken its place. These videos seem to show that this group, reputed to have much closer ties to the Russian Ministry of Defense than its predecessor, has just suffered its first defeat in Mali.
These videos, which were shared on August 1, 2025 by a pro-Wagner Telegram account, show the bodies of three Russian mercenaries filmed by jihadists from the group JNIM during an ambush in the Ténenkou region of northern Mali. The video was blurred by the administrator of the Telegram channel. © Telegram/Sand88cat


The bodies of three mercenaries are visible in the videos filmed by jihadists with the group JNIM. Another video shows a Russian-made Ural-4320 truck that has been totally destroyed.

Published on Whatsapp on August 1, 2025, this video shows a jihadist fighter in northern Mali inspecting a captured Ural-4320 truck. © Whatsapp

The day after the ambush, online analysts published videos they said showed a helicopter in a reprisal operation against the JNIM fighters. The Observers team was not able to confirm the geolocation of the video.

Online analysts published a video August 2, 2025 that they said showed a helicopter operating against jihadist revels from the JNIM group. © X/OSINTWarfare

Shortly after the ambush, JNIM published a statement through its official media outlet Az-Zallaqa, claiming to have captured "a military vehicle, 16 Kalashnikovs, two PK machine guns, ammunition and various other pieces of equipment”.

This is a screengrab showing an official post from JNIM showing the loot that the jihadist group seized during an ambush on August 1, 2025. © Az-Zallaqa

Criticism by former Wagner recruits

After news of the ambush broke, Russian military bloggers began to criticise the Africa Corps. Military blogger and analyst Rybar called it a "stern warning” that should “serve as a lesson”.

“The African front is too often underestimated,” he said. “The complexity of fighting here is comparable, or perhaps even superior to, operations in the Special Operation Zone," a reference to Russia’s war on Ukraine.

This map, shared on August 4, 2025, by the Telegram account Rybar shows where the ambush took place, according to the Russian analyst. © Rybar

In a message published on Telegram the day of the ambush, the pro-Wagner Russian blogger Turist called it a "disaster".

“It should have been possible to avoid this considering all the resources at the disposal of the Africa Corps,” he said.

He also deplored that the fighters had abandoned both some of their vehicles and the bodies of their comrades.

The Telegram channel Sand Cat, which has close links to Wagner, also deplored the lack of aerial support during the ambush.

"There were no security helicopters,” the administrator wrote. “Precious time was thus lost and the price was the lives of our fighters. Normally, it wouldn’t take longer than 20 minutes for a machine to arrive from the nearest base, if the engine is warmed up. A MI-24 [Editor’s note: a Russian helicopter] could have torn this group of scum [Editor’s note: here, he refers to the jihadists] to shreds.”

Sand Cat also criticised the commanders of the Africa Corps for not making an effort to learn from the Wagner fighters who spent years in the field in Mali.

In a post from August 1, Sand Cat mocked the Africa Corps, imagining them saying: “We don’t listen to the Wagner idiots, who walked this land for years, who took their punches and know how to work here and how to work with the local population. We are too smart, we went to military school, we have experience on paper that dates back to Chechnya.”
"The arrival of new heavy equipment from the Africa Corps won’t change anything”

Only three mercenary bodies are visible in the videos shared by the jihadists, but according to a regional specialist who wants to remain anonymous, the Russians lost many more men. He says that they did not have the right equipment for fighting against a counterinsurgency:

According to the non-official tally by the jihadists, which I can’t confirm, there were at least 40 people killed, including 14 Russians. The jihadists wanted to hit hard because Ténenkou is their territory. Historically, this land was under the control of Amadou Koufa [Editor’s note: one of the Fula chiefs who was a commander with the JNIM], so they want to show that they control their territory. That’s why the JNIM decided to attack this convoy that was bringing supplies from Niono towards the advance base at Dioura.

The region is totally under jihadist control. Outside the big cities, the government doesn’t have a presence here. State structures (administrative, judicial, security) are all absent in the rural zones. Instead, the JNIM are seen as the legitimate authority with political, ideological and territorial control.

The JNIM use Islamic law to keep a handle on how natural resources are extracted and used by local authorities in the area. The jihadists require people to pay zakat [an Islamic tax]. They also apply sharia law and run the resources.

For their part, the Malian Armed Forces and the Russians don’t seem to be able to expand from their bases. Before, they were totally surrounded. The arrival of new heavy material belonging to the Africa Corps won’t change anything. These armoured vehicles and Russian tanks are ineffective against insurgents who get around on motorcycles. Thanks to an extremely dense network of informers across the population, the jihadists are aware of every movement across their territory.

The area around Ténenkou is a complex environment with mangroves, pastoral areas and some areas that can become flooded depending on the season. It is the perfect landscape for guerrillas. The jihadists know the terrain very well. The JNIM has even created tunnels near places with water and their own passageways for vehicles. However, the Malian Army and the Russians have to depend on guides who don’t know the land as well as the jihadists.

The Malian Armed Forces published a statement on August 1, confirming that there was an "ambush ongoing”. However, in the days that followed, Malian authorities didn’t provide any further details about the damage sustained or the loss of human life.
Why is the US discreetly easing pressure on Myanmar's junta?

Analysis


The US announced on July 24 that it was lifting sanctions against several allies of Myanmar's ruling military junta and their businesses. Human rights activists called the move “shameful” and a “catastrophic message” at a time when the junta is seeking international recognition.


Issued on: 08/08/2025
FRANCE24
By:Cyrielle CABOT

Workers sit in the back of a truck transporting goods in Yangon on August 5, 2025. © Sai Aung Main, AFP

The US Treasury said in a brief statement on July 24 that several individuals and companies allied to the ruling military junta in Myanmar had been removed from the US sanctions list imposed since the 2021 coup.

Specifically, sanctions were lifted against three companies and four individuals. Among them were KT Services and Logistics and its chief executive, Jonathan Myo Kyaw Thaung, whose affiliated companies have long been under scrutiny for having close links to the junta.

Also removed from the US sanctions list were Myanmar Chemical and Machinery Company and Suntac Technologies – companies that manufacture weapons – and their owners. A third Myanmar national, Tin Latt Min, whom the US had described as the owner of “various companies closely linked to the regime”, was also taken off the sanctions list.

'Shocking' to ease sanctions

"It's a shame," says Anna Roberts, executive director of the NGO Burma Campaign UK, which has been compiling a blacklist of companies accused of collaborating with the Tatmadaw – the armed forces of Myanmar – since 2018.

"Sanctions should be strengthened against the junta and its supporters as long as it continues to commit atrocities against the population,” Roberts says. “It's even more shocking that sanctions would be lifted on companies that facilitate the supply of weapons to the military."

The military junta led by General Min Aung Hlaing seized power in Myanmar in February 2021, overthrowing the elected government of Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi.

Since the coup, the country has been embroiled in a civil war between the military and a pro-democracy movement made up of several ethnic minority groups. As fighting rages in several parts of the country, NGOs regularly report human rights violations.

In its latest report on Myanmar, Amnesty International notes that the internal armed conflict has escalated. “The frequency of military air strikes increased, as did military attacks on schools, hospitals and civilian infrastructure,” the NGO notes, adding that the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has applied for an arrest warrant against Min Aung Hlaing for the deportation and persecution of the minority Rohingya population.

Read moreICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrant for Myanmar’s junta leader for crimes against humanity

“The action suggests a major shift is underway in US policy, which had centred on punitive action against Myanmar's military regime,” says John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch.

“The decision will cause deep concern among victims of the Myanmar military and everyone who has been fighting and advocating for a return to democratic rule in Myanmar,” he adds.

Exchange of letters


Since the shift on sanctions was announced, speculation has been rife as to what motivated the US decision. For some analysts, the answer is mainly economic, but it may also just have been a question of playing to the ego of US President Donald Trump.

In early July, Trump sent a letter to Min Aung Hlaing notifying him that as part of his new trade policy, a 40 percent tariff on Myanmar’s exports to the US would take effect on August 1.

The junta leader responded in a letter on July 11 that included a proposal to negotiate a trade deal with the US and added a flattering appraisal of Trump. As Myanmar state media said at the time, "The senior general (Min Aung Hlaing) acknowledged the president's strong leadership in guiding his country towards national prosperity with the spirit of a true patriot."

But despite the junta leader’s words of praise, this exchange of letters is probably not the dawn a new relationship, Roberts says. "This letter from Donald Trump is just a copy/paste – like the ones he sends to other countries. There is no evidence of a desire to build closer ties with the junta," she says.

"But for the junta, this would have raised hopes of normalising relations with the United States."

The allure of rare earths

Myanmar is a leading source of rare earth minerals, a major focus for the Trump administration in its strategic competition with China, responsible for 90 percent of global rare earth processing capacity.

Watch moreChina hits back at Trump tariffs with export restrictions on rare earths

The metals are used in a wide variety of everyday and high-tech products, from electric car batteries to guided missiles.

Since 2021, Myanmar has doubled its exports of rare earths to neighbouring China, according to a 2024 study by Global Witness, an NGO specialising in combating the plunder of natural resources in developing countries. The mines extracting rare earths are located in Kachin State, on the China-Myanmar border, where they have proliferated, increasing to more than 300 last year from 180 in 2021.

Did the US lift sanctions as part of a strategy to gain access to these minerals? "If so, it seems highly risky,” says Roberts. “Firstly, because China has always been the junta's biggest supporter and wields considerable influence in Myanmar.”

“And even if the United States manages to take control of these mines, there is a strong possibility that it will not be able to do much with them,” she adds. “The logistical challenge would be immense. Some mines are located in areas currently under the control of the Kachin Independence Army, one of the ethnic groups fighting against the junta.”

It is unlikely that US companies would jeopardise their reputations or “risk exposing themselves to legal action by participating in such a project in a war zone”, she adds.

Denying that the US had an agenda in lifting the sanctions, US deputy secretary of the Treasury Michael Faulkender said in a statement: “Anyone suggesting these sanctions were lifted for an ulterior motive is uninformed and peddling a conspiracy theory driven by hatred for President Trump,” adding that individuals “are regularly added and removed” from the list of those sanctioned “in the ordinary course of business”.

A junta in search of legitimacy

In any case, "the message sent by Donald Trump is catastrophic”, Roberts says. “His policies have already been terrible for the Burmese people, principally because of the USAID budget cuts” which have deprived many people of vital aid. “He is playing into the hands of the junta at a time when it has embarked on a major quest for legitimacy and international recognition.”

The military junta on July 31 announced the lifting of the state of emergency, which had been in place since the coup. Their stated objective is to hold general elections in December 2025 or January 2026. The military hopes to consolidate its power and give itself an appearance of legitimacy, even though large parts of the country are still controlled by the pro-democracy movement. For their part, opposition groups have already announced their intention to boycott the elections.

“The military had done the same thing during a previous coup in 2010. They organised elections and released prisoners to try to give the appearance of stability. That was enough to ease the pressure from the international community,” says Roberts. “We must learn from the past and not fall into the same trap again. Now is not the time to scale back international action. This means maintaining – or even tightening – sanctions."

This article has been adapted from the original in French by David Howley.