Thursday, January 22, 2026

China Trumps the Western Empire on Three Technological Fronts



 January 22, 2026

Photograph Source: Peggy Greb, US department of agriculture – Public Domain

China may have paused its rare earth ban in November, but such a sanction remains a sword of Damocles over U.S. arms manufacturers. Nor is it China’s only high-tech weapon. Quite apart from its ability to tank the U.S. economy by – first step – ditching U.S. debt, Beijing can easily overcome Washington in three technological arenas: rare earths, jamming Starlink, which is so critical on any western battlefield, and, as geo-political researcher Brian Berletic has convincingly argued on X on January 15, by securing its and its allies’ information space. This trio of challenges has many implications, for instance: on January 12, the Trump regime slapped tariffs on anyone buying Iranian oil, so India stopped much of this trade pronto – but China picked up the slack and now purchases almost ALL Iranian oil. Is Beijing being tariffed by the geniuses in Washington? No way. It trades with Iran with impunity and not in dollars, because at the first whiff of trouble from the U.S., the 5000-year-old civilization can slam export controls back on Gallium, Germanium, Graphite, Antinomy and other rare earths and bingo! It zaps most American weapons production to a halt.

How can China do this? Because it’s home to 60 percent of the world’s rare earths, and the other 40 percent are nearly inaccessible. Even more unassailably, 90 percent of all rare earth processing occurs in China. So Beijing literally sells Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and other U.S. arms makers the materials, without which they cannot produce modern weapons. That includes radar, submarines, F-35s, drones and missiles. In short, China has American defense contractors by the throat and knows this very well.

And not just weapons producers. Electric vehicles, wind turbines, laptops, data centers, smart-phones and AI infrastructure like semi-conductors and data storage all depend on rare earths only available from China. So if Donald “Over 100 Percent Tariffs on China” Trump threatens Xi Jinping with astronomical costs, as he did in October, life in the U.S. that depends on modern, computerized conveniences pretty much grinds to a halt. This is not news. It was reported in this space in July 2023. That’s when Joe “Bully Beijing” Biden so offended the Chinese nation that for the first time ever it announced export controls on Germanium and Gallium. It’s reassuring to know that Washington finally got the message, and we American consumers can still purchase laptops.

But it wasn’t easy, since our rulers are pretty dense when it comes to recognizing that anyone besides them has power. In 2025, it took China restricting such rare earths as Samarium, Lutetium, Terbium, Gadolinium, Dysprosium, Yttrium, Scandium, Holmium, Thulium, Erbium, Ytterbium and Europium for white house dunces to realize there was a gun to their heads. Back then, China said dual use (civilian/military) products required export controls. Beltway bigwigs woke up with a start: Washington no longer cornered the market on crippling international economic sanctions. And the rest is history.

But just because Beijing paused its rare earth export controls doesn’t mean anyone there’s asleep at the switch. Look at what’s going on with Elon Musk’s Starlink, which is absolutely vital to western wars and which relies on low earth orbit satellites for streaming and communications in essential spots like battlefields. Like in Ukraine, Iran and Taiwan. The Russkies figured out how to jam Starlink in Ukraine, while Chinese researches simulated “large scale electronic warfare against Elon Musk’s Starlink…jamming [it] across an area matching Taiwan,” according to 9Dashline on X on November 26.

Then came the idiotic Sturm und Drang over Iran, the week of January 15 – would the nitwits in the white house bomb the Persian Empire or no? They backed off for multiple reasons: Tehran has long-range missiles galore, very effective Russian and Chinese Air Defense, the capacity to put large holes in American navy ships and a clear shot at numerous U.S. military bases in the region, to say nothing of its ability to obliterate the postage-stamp-sized acreage of Israel. Also, it was reported on X that Moscow and Beijing showed Tehran how to zap the 40,000 Starlink terminals that the western Empire had smuggled into Iran, namely by totally blacking out the internet, so those terminals lit up like Christmas trees. Without Starlink, the Iranians began capturing the 1000s of commandos who’d infiltrated from Kurdistan, and the regime change op collapsed.

The third big technological field on which China has outplayed the U.S. Empire is securing its information space. This is a stupendous block against CIA-backed coups, regime change efforts and color revolutions, and both China and Russia have outstripped everyone else in the multipolar world in this regard. So they have blazed a trail that any non-U.S.-puppet government interested in survival must follow – looking at you, Iran and Brazil, just for starters. “Throughout the 21st century,” wrote Brian Berletic on X January 15, “the U.S. has deliberately and maliciously weaponized its domination over global information space, specifically through U.S.-based social media platforms like X (formerly twitter), Meta/Facebook, YouTube, Google, Instagram and many others.” But China and Russia, over years and with hard work, “secured their respective information space. This has – in turn – allowed both nations to secure and stabilize their political space, providing the social harmony required to not only survive ongoing attempts by the U.S. to encircle an contain both global powers, but in many instances to thrive.”

Berletic argues that China and Russia accomplished this by creating “domestic alternatives to the U.S.-based social media platforms.” They have “online networks that can be disconnected from Western-influenced information space when and if necessary.” And now, apparently, they have helped Iran achieve this, too, though unlike China and Russia, it probably has not yet created a reservoir of technicians and programmers “to maintain the physical infrastructure of this information space,” experts who are patriotic and trained in-country. Berletic compares all this to any sovereign nation’s physical infrastructure. He concludes that any country that surrenders this key aspect of national security to the U.S. pays the price of “political infiltration, capture and even complete collapse,” and urges Russia and China to export “turnkey domestic alternatives to U.S. social media platforms, physical infrastructure and gateways as well as electronic warfare equipment” for use against such assaults as the recent U.S. fiasco vis a vis Iran.

These three developments – with rare earths, Starlink and securing the information space – signify a crossroads for the western Empire. It can continue to hurl its bombs, artillery and other assets futilely against the multipolar powers that have achieved independence and, if it does, face devastating consequences, such as the massive battlefield losses in Ukraine, the aborted Iran assault and disrupted supply chains for U.S. defense contractors, disruptions that will in short order cripple American weapons making. Or the U.S., the European Union and other vassals like Australia, Canada, South Korea and Japan can accommodate the unbeatable new powers and relax in the knowledge that, apparently, neither Russia nor China nor Russia/China aspires to be a global hegemon. They appear content to rule in their immediate neighborhood. But of course, accepting that means that the U.S., too, must abandon the hallucination of global hegemony. Are the psychopaths in Washinton up to this task – or does it take reality, as it already has done in a small way, to smack them in the face in a much bigger way? I, for one, have no idea. You pick.

Eve Ottenberg is a novelist and journalist. Her latest novel is Booby Prize. She can be reached at her website.

Why Aren’t All Americans Protesting?


 January 22, 2026

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

Being an American with a firm grasp of reality and a dose of empathy is pretty difficult at this time. We see the comments after articles from our neighbors. Their responses move from irrational to apologist, exhibiting a vision of the country that seems like hell to many of us. Somehow, it seems to be reassuring to them to have cruelty’s back. These comments show up all over the place, especially after any articles that pertain to what is happening in Minneapolis and the state-sanctioned murder of Renee Good.

We see anything from she shouldn’t have hit him with her car (obviously terrifying that our fellow Americans can watch that footage and think this is what happened) or that she shouldn’t have been “blocking the way” (also a frequent refrain and ironically, what many from the far right cite as their reason to be able to run into protesters with their own cars). Yes, many of the more repetitive and divisive comments are definitely from bot farms, but the fact that many are not is chilling.

The cult members among us– they contort their views to match what their leader wants them to believe. These are the Americans who were enthralled by “Pizzagate” but, having been presented with mountains of credible evidence against their leader of the same nature, are managing to find themselves in something of a pro-pedophile realm. I think we can probably understand their belief system more effectively if we look to the Manson family member behaviors as a relevant case study instead of traditional Democrat/Republican affiliation narratives.

I do believe this is an important point for our friends outside of the United States to understand. I often see many asking why we don’t simply decide not to comply. They wonder why we don’t take to the streets in such numbers that they would have to bend to our will. A major reason is that this large, though minority group of regime supporters is very much a part of our national fabric. It’s difficult to unravel something that took so many years to construct, that of a bootlicking, Empire approving, acquiescent populace. It’s not like we are dealing with one crazy grandpa in a 10-mile radius. It’s far more widespread and disturbing than this.

These are the people who see the world in black/white (often literally) and were likely raised in an authoritarian household that allowed for no nuance. Those who have bad things happen in this world, well in the minds of these individuals…it was their fault. Raped—you asked for it in some way. In debt—shouldn’t have gone to college and borrowed money for it. Shot in the head by a goon in Minneapolis—shouldn’t have been in that city, shouldn’t have been a lesbian, shouldn’t have sass-talked the man with a gun. There is no end to what they will excuse from the powerful, and no end to the victim-blaming they will engage in. It’s all to protect their tenuous feelings of safety. If they side with the oppressors, they will never be the oppressed. I bring these views out and their backgrounds not to excuse them, plenty have escaped these worldviews, but to understand them.

So that’s the huge demographic we have near us—people immune to most attempts at reason and with a blind allegiance to those with guns. To break them away from this narrative is to have their entire worldview fall apart. They would begin to worry that they could become a victim as well, without their invisible shield of loyalty to the cruel, fending off all harm. You see, the moment you say……no person should ever be raped, it’s the rapist’s fault…that no person should be in dire debt situations in a nation awash in billionaire welfare, that no person should be shot in the head by their own government for not showing proper fear of the man with a gun…that’s when it all falls apart for them. They realize that their bravado, casual cruelty and knee-jerk allegiance to Trump will not afford them any type of protection in such a world. Many of us have no idea if these people can be extracted from the cult mentality. This is what we are grappling with, those of us struggling with nuance, while the worst of the nation has no such limitations. I’m sure it is incredibly liberating in all the wrong ways to never consider that you might be wrong, and these are the fellow citizens we are dealing with.

This is one reason we haven’t all gotten our act together to thwart this in the same manner that protests in places like France play out. We simply have too many bad actors who will not show solidarity with us. They won’t support us even in something as benign as wanting a better social safety net, let alone ceasing the occupation of our cities in a manner they actually find pleasure in watching. They don’t have our back; they have the back of the oppressors. This is a very different situation from what many European nations have in place. And we’ve had decades and decades of brainwashing media that has gathered up those at risk (those raised in authoritarian households, those raised with the magical thinking inherent to prosperity gospel, those identifying as salt of the earth, rules’ followers)–they’ve gathered these people and fed them a diet of excused cruelty and out-group dehumanization. This is a very complicated situation, and I fear we might not be able to “think” our way out of it.

We are seeing many Americans fall into despair, an enormous number of them simply want to move to another country where their ideals are matched—where others won’t want to inflict cruelty and dominance on others as state policy. In my lifetime (I’m in my 50s), I’ve seen what limited social net we had be shredded. The sheer number of unhoused individuals has skyrocketed in a setting of a 62.8 trillion-dollar stock market. To give you a concept of how much money that is…if you were to equally divide that amount, it would put $190,300 in the bank accounts of every American. This is just one indicator of the type of power and wealth disparity we are now fully immersed in. This kind of affluence is out there when we have record numbers of individuals living in cars, on the streets… they are strategically placed there without aid to warn others not to rock the boat or the same will happen to them.

For all the talk of progress and modernity, where we find ourselves is a bleak place that doesn’t lend itself to most of the residents doing anything but trying to survive, let alone trying to act together to make life better. It’s an embarrassment and if one were to take the view of an anthropologist from a sane planet, they’d be shocked that any system would be set up in such a manner. They would most likely feel we degenerated from our hunter-gatherer times when such enormous hoarding and planet destruction were not even a possibility.

The lack of a social safety net is very effective in tamping down protests and work stoppages. Not having universal healthcare is a huge aspect of this, and it is again, by design. For the younger workers—those more inclined to protest—they know if they strike and lose their job, they won’t have health coverage. If they have dependents, they would not be able to care for them if they become ill or have chronic health needs. Our system claims thousands yearly who die due to lack of care, so it isn’t an idle threat.

These are just a few of the reasons we don’t have the kind of massive strikes going on that will probably be needed soon. Perhaps as people have less to lose, we will see this barrier fall.

I absolutely do not have the answers, but knowing fully what we are up against is key. It may come to some of us, realizing that we were never guaranteed a safe life and perhaps there are things worse than death. We all want to be the people who stopped the horrible events of the past; we don’t want to be the enablers of horror in the future. My wildly optimistic hope is that the cult members can be reclaimed to some sort of humanity, and the pendulum will swing away from the death-dealing philosophy of unhindered capitalism that has allowed for such a regime to even exist.

Kathleen Wallace writes out of the US Midwest. Her writing is collected on her Substack page.

Renée Good knew White Silence is Violence


 January 22, 2026


Image by Bradley Andrews.

There’s been a lot of focus on Renée Nicole Maklin Good as a mom. Parenthood is frequently used to construct a narrative of innocent victimhood, often while other complicating elements of a person’s identity are obscured. Good was a mother of three, and her death at the hands of the state will shape the rest of their lives. She was also a queer race traitor, and we’ve heard less about that.

We can’t know the mind of Jonathan Ross but, as Autum Brown said, “Renee Good was not killed despite being white. She was killed because she’s a white woman aligned with the cause of freedom.” I believe her whiteness and queerness stoked Ross’s vitriolic murderous rage. “Fucking bitch” carries a lot of intersecting hateful connotations. Those of us who are queer white women or gender non-conforming people have had those words spit at us by white men. We always know why.

Renée Good broke the rules. As the protest signs have proclaimed, she was “Good Trouble,” rather than a traditional “good girl.” She loved a woman. They had a queer family – mini-van, dog, and all. She stopped that mini-van in the middle of the street. She did that to help interrupt racist, xenophobic state violence. She stopped to help her immigrant Black and brown neighbors. She could have kept driving. All the rules, all the norms, would have had her keep driving. Rule-abiding, complicit white people, civil (law & order) white people, “good” white people… keep driving. We look away.

Not Good. She (and her wife) stopped. It was freezing. Armed federal agents were screaming at her, circling her car. She could have closed her window. Instead, she leaned out, smiled, and with relaxed posture and a calm tone said, “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

Good refused to be intimidated or provoked by militarized toxic masculinity. Perhaps it was her faith, perhaps she had de-escalation training. Whatever it was, her response was more than many of us could manage. This month many of us are reflecting on the prescience of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Good seems to have taken to heart his lesson that white silence is violence. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King wrote:

“I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councillor or the Ku Klux Klanner but the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.”

Renée Nicole Good was determined not to be that white moderate. She was participating in movements “striding toward freedom.” And now thousands are inspired by her moral courage. White people are getting trained and pouring into the streets in Minneapolis with whistles and cell phones, red cards and groceries. They have, to quote King again, “grasped the meaning of this social revolution and committed themselves to it. They are still all too small in quantity, but they are big in quality.”

Let’s swell those numbers so we are big in quantity and quality. Let’s form a crowd and stay loud. Let’s confront “the fierce urgency of now.” Let’s be race traitors. Let’s break unjust laws. Let’s make “Good trouble.” Solo el pueblo salva al pueblo!

This piece first appeared on Range Media.

Judy Rohrer is a scholar-activist who has written previously about whiteness, racial politics, and settler colonialism for both academic and popular audiences. Rohrer is currently the Director of Gender, Women’s, & Sexuality Studies at Eastern Washington University.