Friday, April 03, 2026

 

New study uncovers surprises in urban Peruvians



Researchers from the University of Maryland School of Medicine say the study could lead to more equitable medical research and precision treatments




University of Maryland School of Medicine

Victor Borda, PhD 

image: 

Victor Borda, PhD, of the University of Maryland School of Medicine, and colleagues have published the largest study to date on the genetics of native Peruvians.

view more 

Credit: University of Maryland School of Medicine





Baltimore, April 2, 2026: Latin American people are represented in fewer than four percent of genetic epidemiological studies around the world. When they are included, they’re often lumped together as one group, despite the rich diversity among different Latin American populations. This lack of data has impeded genetic discoveries in Latin Americans and has stalled advances in the clinical use of precision medicine.

To better understand the fine-scale ancestry of one specific Latin American population—Peruvians—researchers from the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM), along with colleagues from the Peru Institute of National Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud), undertook the largest study to date to examine the genetic makeup of individuals from urban areas throughout Peru. They published their study in Communication Biology.

“We were surprised to discover that despite historical events—like the slave trade or Spanish colonization—over the past few centuries, urban Peruvians resemble more of ancient Indigenous populations from nearby regions, including the Andes and the Amazon, rather than a single melting-pot population,” said lead author Victor Borda, PhD, Research Associate at the Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS) at UMSOM and faculty at the University of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, who is also a native Peruvian.

The researchers collected blood from more than 400 volunteers in 13 regions across Peru and did genome-wide studies, examining more than two million genetic markers in each participant.

The study also showed that women were more likely to transmit Indigenous ancestry, while men contributed more European ancestry. This reflects the uneven mixing between the sexes during colonial times, when European men frequently partnered with Indigenous women, often under coercive conditions. Because the X chromosome is transmitted twice as often through females, it preserves a stronger signal of maternal Indigenous ancestry.

“This pattern is consistent with colonial social hierarchies and power dynamics and can be distinguished genetically through differences in X chromosome and autosomal ancestry,” said Timothy O’Connor, PhD, a scientist at IGS, Associate Professor of Medicine at UMSOM, and corresponding author on the paper. “Our study shows that history can be written in the genome and isn’t erased just by moving to a city.” 

Most importantly, however, is the study’s potential impact on health and disease for Latin Americans, the researchers say.

“The more we understand the finest details of genetic ancestry, the easier it will be to implement true precision medicine—getting the right medicine, to the right individual, at the right time,” Dr. O’Connor said. “This is where research, like this large study, remains critical, especially in populations that tend to be put into one uniform category, such as Latin Americans or Asians, when we know there is much diversity in their genetic ancestry.”

About the Institute for Genome Sciences

The Institute for Genome Sciences' (IGS) has been part of the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) since 2007. IGS scientists work in diverse areas, applying genomics and systems biology approaches to better understand health issues to create a healthier Maryland and world. Our research spans multiple areas including cancer and precision medicine; parasitic, fungal, and bacterial diseases; sexual and reproductive health; the underpinnings of aging; and neuroscience areas including brain development, addiction, and mental health IGS also remains at the forefront of high-throughput genomic technologies and bioinformatics analyses through its core facility, Maryland Genomics which provides researchers around the world with cutting-edge, collaborative, and cost-effective sequencing and analysis.

About the UM-IHC

The University of Maryland Institute for Health Computing (UM-IHC), in North Bethesda, Maryland, is the hub for health computing innovation and collaboration in Montgomery County, Maryland. UM-IHC merges the computational expertise, clinical expertise, biomedical innovation, health data and academic resources of the University of Maryland, College Park; the University of Maryland, Baltimore; and the University of Maryland Medical System to innovate health care delivery and support the Montgomery County life science community. It is a signature initiative of the University of Maryland Strategic Partnership: MPowering the State, which provides funding support along with Montgomery County.

About the University of Maryland School of Medicine

The University of Maryland School of Medicine, established in 1807 as the first public medical school in the U.S., continues today as one of the fastest growing, top-tier biomedical research enterprises in the world. The School has nearly $500 million total research funding, 46 departments, centers, and institutes, more than 2,200 student trainees and over 3,000 faculty members, including notable members of the National Academy of Medicine. As the largest public medical school in the DC/MD/VA region, faculty-physicians are working to help patients manage chronic diseases like obesity, cancer, heart disease and addiction, while also working on cutting-edge research to address the most critical generational health challenges. In 2024, the School ranked #12 among public medical schools and #27 among all medical schools for R&D expenditures by the National Science Foundation. With a $1.3 billion total operating budget, the School partners with the University of Maryland Medical Center to serve nearly 2 million patients annually. The School's global reach extends around the world with research and treatment facilities in 33 countries.  In Maryland, the School of Medicine is spearheading new initiatives in AI and health computing and partnering with the University of Maryland BioPark to develop new medical technologies and bioengineering ventures. For more information, visit medschool.umaryland.edu.

 

Omics consortium established to supercharge climate-adapted wheat breeding



Adelaide University





Adelaide University is leading the international Wheat Spatial Omics Consortium (WSOC) of more than 30 institutions in nine countries, which will explore how collaborative research in spatial omics technologies could improve wheat performance for growers.

Spatial omics is a suite of molecular technologies that measure and map the distribution of genes, proteins, and metabolites while preserving their native spatial context and cellular organisation, which conventional omics cannot achieve.

“Spatial transcriptomics allows us to measure the abundance of genes in specific cell types and time-points that are responsible for yield, pest and disease resistance, and abiotic stress tolerance of crops,” said Professor Zhong-Hua Chen, from Adelaide University’s School of Agriculture, Food and Wine and Waite Research Institute.

“Although widely applied in medical and animal sciences, the use of spatial omics in crops with large complex genomes, such as allohexaploid wheat, remains limited.

“Among our consortium members, we have the technological power to tackle this complexity across multiple tissues and stages of development.”

Professor Chen and the WSOC collaborators published a paper in Nature Genetics detailing the potential for the application of spatial omics in wheat.

“Our ambition is to build a comprehensive spatial omics atlas to benefit the whole wheat community. By mapping wheat biology at subcellular resolution across the full life cycle, the WSOC seeks to decode the integrated mechanisms of wheat development, stress response, and grain quality.” he said.

“We are producing this atlas in parallel with a set of research questions led by different groups that will allow us to tackle important issues in wheat breeding such as leaf rust resistance, root drought tolerance, and high grain quality for bread-making.

“This is an enormous task, but wheat is a globally critical crop, so improving grain yield and quality has real-world impacts for people experiencing food insecurity and malnutrition.”

Australian wheat exports are valued at more than AUD$9 billion annually, and exports from the 10 leading wheat-exporting countries is valued at more than USD$60 billion.

Professor Matthew Tucker, Director of the Waite Research Institute, said that spatial omics is a game-changing technology that revolutionises the way research is carried out.

“Technological advances of this nature don’t come along very often. We are very excited to be leading this consortium and building on the legacy of wheat research at Adelaide University,” he said.

“The omics atlas will provide opportunities to narrow down the basis for important heat-sensitive traits, such as flower fertility or grain quality, and understand which cell types are responsible for tolerance.”

Professor Jason Able, Dean of School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, said research outputs generated from this technology will contribute to the way wheat breeders consider building their next step-change variety.

“This research will enable global wheat breeders to unlock the interplay and complexity of plant neural networks and how genes respond to various biotic, abiotic, environmental and climatic factors,” he said

“Ultimately, tapping into this knowledge will create the wheat varieties of tomorrow and value-add significantly across the industry, thereby contributing to the profitability of this commodity.”


Ultra-low asparagine wheat developed using precision gene editing



Scientists have successfully developed wheat with dramatically reduced levels of asparagine, without affecting yield, offering promising route to safer food production




Rothamsted Research

Dr Navneet Kaur with bread, toast and biscuits made from the CRISPR edited wheat 

image: 

Dr Navneet Kaur with bread, toast and biscuits made from the CRISPR edited wheat

view more 

Credit: Rothamsted Research





Scientists at Rothamsted Research have successfully developed wheat with dramatically reduced levels of asparagine, without affecting yield, using gene editing techniques, offering a promising route to safer food production and improved regulatory compliance.

Results from two years of field trials demonstrate that wheat produced using CRISPR genome editing can significantly lower concentrations of free asparagine—an amino acid that converts into acrylamide, a toxic and probably carcinogenic compound formed during everyday baking, frying, and toasting.

The study, conducted in collaboration with partners including Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology, Technical University of Munich, University of Reading, and Curtis Analytics Limited, compared CRISPR-edited wheat lines with conventionally mutagenised (TILLING) lines (wheat that had its genetic material altered through exposure to a chemical agent to create random mutations).

CRISPR editing targeted the asparagine synthetase-2 (TaASN2) gene, responsible for asparagine production. One edited line also included a partial knockout of the related TaASN1 gene. These targeted edits reduced free asparagine in the grain by 59%, and by up to 93% in the dual-edited line, without any reduction in yield.

By contrast, wheat developed using traditional TILLING methods achieved a 50% reduction in free asparagine but suffered a yield penalty of nearly 25%, likely due to unintended mutations elsewhere in the genome. The results highlight the precision and efficiency of gene editing compared with conventional approaches.

Lead researcher Dr Navneet Kaur, from Rothamsted Research, said:
“This work demonstrates the power of CRISPR technology to deliver precise, beneficial changes in crop genetics. With supportive regulatory frameworks, we can unlock significant benefits for agriculture and food systems.”

Crucially, the reduction in asparagine translated directly into lower acrylamide formation in food products. Bread and biscuits made from the edited wheat showed substantially reduced acrylamide levels, with concentrations in some bread samples falling below detectable limits, even after toasting. In contrast, evidence to date suggests that conventional breeding would be unlikely to deliver a similar improvement.

These findings are particularly timely as regulatory pressure on acrylamide intensifies. Current EU legislation (Regulation (EU) 2017/2158) sets benchmark levels for acrylamide in food, with new Maximum Levels expected from the European Commission this year. These regulations will impact food producers across Europe and international trading partners, including the UK. The research also aligns with recent policy developments for genome edited crops in England, in the form of the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023.

Professor Nigel Halford from Rothamsted Research, who led the study, said:
“Low acrylamide wheat could enable food businesses to meet evolving safety standards without compromising product quality or incurring major production costs. It also offers a meaningful opportunity to reduce the dietary exposure of consumers to acrylamide.”

Low acrylamide wheat products 

Low acrylamide wheat products

Field trial of the gene-edited wheat in July 2023

Credit

Rothamsted Research


 

How can science support and enable the High Seas Treaty?





University of Plymouth




The Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) agreement – often known as the High Seas Treaty – came into force in January this year following almost two decades of negotiations.

Its key objectives are the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas which lie outside any single country's jurisdiction, remote areas that make up roughly two-thirds of the global ocean – areas which remain largely unexplored but hold as yet unquantified levels of valuable biodiversity and resources.

A new study published in the journal npj Ocean Sustainability says while there has been considerable research into the international policy implications of implementing the agreement, there has until now been a lack of information on how science can play its role in delivering the objectives.

To address this, a group of internationally renowned experts in marine science and policy conducted a wide-ranging review of existing science that can support the implementation of the agreement and the gaps that need to be filled.

This involved taking each of the four pillars of the agreement and exploring current knowledge surrounding them, identifying where existing technologies can be adapted or further developed, or if novel, emerging technologies are required, and how investment is needed to up-scale data collection and support capacity building in less developed nations, in order to meet the requirements of the Treaty. The authors also showcase examples of relevant science and lessons-learned on solutions.

Based on their analysis, the researchers say there are considerable challenges – ranging from the lack of basic biodiversity monitoring and long-term time series, through to understanding of processes such as connectivity between areas at large scales or depths – which they believe could presently hamper the BBNJ’s implementation from a scientific and technological perspective.

However, they say their analysis also shows how major scientific and technical developments in recent years – including greater use of marine autonomous vessels to conduct surveys and artificial intelligence to analyse data – could help address these challenges and gaps.

Using this information they have develop a solutions-based roadmap which they believe can deliver the science required to fulfil the BBNJ Agreement objectives, which they intend to assist governments and policymakers in ensuring it can be delivered as an effective and global effort to protect marine biodiversity.

The study’s lead author is Dr Claire Szostek, Lecturer in Marine Conservation at the University of Plymouth and until recently a Senior Scientist at Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), and also involved a number of other researchers from Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Nature Conservancy and The Natural History Museum.

Dr Szostek said: “The BBNJ agreement is a major global achievement that has great potential when it comes to protecting some of the most remote and pristine parts of our ocean. It has taken a long time and a lot of effort to reach this point, but until now focus has been on policy, with no clear and concise picture of how the agreement can be implemented from a scientific perspective. Our study delivers that, providing a solutions-focussed pathway to implementing the agreement and helping drive the realisation of equitable, sustainable and resilient management of the high seas.”

The study has been published just weeks after the Third BBNJ Symposium, which brought together scientists, policymakers, practitioners, Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), civil society and other stakeholders to explore the role of science and knowledge in implementing and governing the BBNJ agreement.

Professor Matt Frost, Head of the International Office at PML and senior author on the study, was among those who attended the event in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from March 10-12.

He said: “The BBNJ is an incredible opportunity, including in terms of how it will consolidate and achieve global marine protection goals. But making the rules is actually the easier part - ensuring delivery is where the real challenge lies. This unprecedented exercise in global diplomacy requires the strategic mobilisation and utilisation of the best available scientific data, expertise and technology. Furthermore, it will require major capacity-building in those geographic areas where resources have historically been limited or inaccessible.”

A roadmap to enhance data resources and sharing

After analysing the BBNJ Agreement objectives, and reviewing the science already in place to meet them, the researchers have suggested a five-point action plan which they believe will enable science and policy communities to better support the agreement:

  • Action 1 – Embrace technological advancements: While maintaining existing time series and traditional taxonomic expertise is imperative, technological advances are necessary for improved data collection in remote ocean locations;
  • Action 2 – Upscale spatial-temporal coverage and sharing of data: Improvement in the pipeline from data-to-tools is required, including greater interoperability between global databases and maintaining common metadata standards;
  • Action 3 – Novel funding sources and data collection platforms: The inaccessibility of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, coupled with a challenging funding climate requires more enterprising approaches to data collection, such as utilising fishing vessels as research platforms;
  • Action 4 – Design marine spatial planning that is climate-smart: Adaptive, climate-smart approaches for area-based management tools are essential, so that management remains effective as species ranges shift under changing ocean conditions, and to protect high carbon areas of the seafloor, using conservation to deliver mitigation;
  • Action 5 – Build capacity and share resources: Effective implementation of BBNJ Agreement activities requires international collaboration, supported by alignment of effort across conventions.

All of this, they add, needs to occur with mechanisms that can be transferred at a global scale rather than just at a national level so that the measures can be implemented fairly across both developed and developing countries.

Co-Author Dr Jeff Ardron, Africa Oceans Director at The Nature Conservancy, said: “For States to meet their commitments to protect the global ocean, we will have to get serious about understanding the high seas. Fortunately, we already know enough to get started. For example, the Walvis Ridge acts as a biological bridge from Namibia’s continental shelf out to the mid-Atlantic Ridge, even though the details remain unstudied. There are many such ecologically significant areas that that deserve our research attentions and protections.”

Co-author Chris Lyal, Scientific Associate at the Natural History Museum, London, added: “The new Treaty marks a new and exciting prospect for managing and protecting marine biodiversity, and a global determination to improve how we protect the oceans. The next challenge is how we put this into practice.  The number of species of microorganisms, animals and plants in the oceans of our world is huge – but we know surprisingly little about what they are or how they live. Every year many species new to science are discovered and named – but there are many more which are awaiting analysis. Part of the roadmap to implementing the treaty is improvement of our data collection and the process of identification, description and monitoring of oceanic biodiversity. The political will that enabled the treaty must now turn to supporting the science that will make it work.”

 

Inequalities in childhood pneumococcal vaccine uptake persist in England despite schedule change




University of Liverpool






Vaccine uptake data has been examined to assess the impact of moving from a '2+1' to a '1+1' Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) dose schedule on vaccine coverage and health inequalities among infants in England.

Persistent inequalities remain a major barrier to achieving universal protection against life-threatening infections – reflecting findings from the UK Heath Security Agency National Immunisation Programme Health Equity Audit 2025.

The findings from an interdisciplinary research team including data scientists, infectious disease epidemiologists and physicians from the University of Liverpool are published today (1 April 2026) in the journal The Lancet Regional Health  Europe. 

By performing a data analysis, researchers from the Institute of Population Health and the Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences at the University of Liverpool have examined the trends in timely vaccine uptake before and after England changed its PCV dose schedule in  January 2020 – transitioning from a “2+1” PCV schedule (two primary doses at 8 and 16 weeks, with a booster dose at 12 months) to a “1+1” PCV schedule (single primary dose at 12 weeks and a booster dose at 12 months).

In a longitudinal study, the researchers analysed Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) uptake data from 2013-2025 for children aged 1 and 2 years from the Cover of Vaccination Evaluated Rapidly (COVER) programme. COVER collects quarterly and annual data on childhood immunisation coverage in England for children at 1, 2 and 5 years of age.

Looking at pattens for upper-tier local authorities in England linked to 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles, the study found that PCV booster retention has dropped in England since the schedule change, which coincided with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This deterioration disproportionately affected children in more deprived areas, risking avoidable disease burden concentrated in the most disadvantaged communities and widening health inequalities. The findings agree with evidence from a BMJ article by the wider research team and the UK Heath Security Agency National Immunisation Programme Health Equity Audit 2025, reporting immunisation inequity in England is not only persistent but it is worsening in critical areas.

The number of required clinic visits may be insufficient to overcome the systemic barriers to vaccination faced by marginalised communities. Immunisation system strengthening, targeted, equity-focused interventions and enhanced call-recall systems for post-infant vaccine delivery could help address the identified PCV coverage gaps. These outputs are timely as the House of Lords - Childhood Vaccinations Committee is holding an inquiry to examine childhood vaccination coverage in England, why there has been a gradual decline in coverage over the past decade and what the Government should do to reverse this decline and reduce inequalities in childhood vaccination coverage.

Dr Edward Hill from the University of Liverpool is the corresponding author on the paper. He said: “National averages and patterns can often mask local vulnerabilities. This research highlights the importance of using granular data to identify exactly which groups are falling behind in intervention uptake. Public health interventions can then be more precisely targeted.”

Lead author Praise Ilechukwu from the University of Liverpool commented: “Our study shows that while the UK's move to a 1+1 schedule was evidence-based and efficient, we are still seeing a consistent lag in protection for children in deprived areas. These deprivation-associated inequalities in pneumococcal vaccine coverage in children leaves children in deprived areas more vulnerable to pneumococcal diseases like pneumonia and meningitis.”

Co-author Professor Neil French from the University of Liverpool commented: “Addressing the PCV booster retention issues can be aided by establishing routine monitoring of booster gaps as a key performance indicator for the vaccination programme. This should include regular reporting by deprivation and place to enable early identification of emerging problems.”

Co-author Dr Dan Hungerford from the University of Liverpool commented: “Inequalities persist even with fewer required vaccination appointments for PCV. We need to look at the wider social determinates of inequalities in child health and structural access factors—like flexible vaccination access points and tailored community outreach—to ensure every child is protected regardless of their background.”

The research, published today in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, was supported by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections.

The paper Inequalities in childhood pneumococcal conjugate vaccine uptake in England before and after the change from a 2+1 to 1+1 schedule: a longitudinal study is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(26)00079-7/fulltext