Wednesday, April 08, 2026

Why Anthropic’s most powerful AI model Mythos Preview is too dangerous for public release

FILE - Pages from the Anthropic website and the company's logo are displayed on a computer screen in New York on Feb. 26, 2026.
Copyright AP Photo/Patrick Sison, File

By Pascale Davies
Published on 

Anthropic said its artificial intelligence model Mythos Preview is not ready for a public launch because of the ways cybercriminals and spies could abuse it.

US-based AI developer Anthropic this week announced a new artificial intelligence general-purpose language model that it claims is too powerful to release into the world.

The company said on Tuesday that its latest technology, Mythos (officially dubbed "Claude Mythos Preview"), is not ready for a public launch because it is too effective at finding high-severity vulnerabilities, or potential weaknesses, in major operating systems and web browsers. This could result in it being abused by cybercriminals and spies.

data leak in March first unveiled that Anthropic was working on Mythos Preview, which it said at the time "poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." These rumours caused cybersecurity stocks to slump, as the technology's strength could make it a hacker’s dream device.

Now, further evidence adding to these concerns has spurred the company to press pause on the technology's public release.

"Claude Mythos Preview's large increase in capabilities has led us to decide not to make it generally available," Anthropic wrote in the preview's system card released on Tuesday.

"Instead, we are using it as part of a defensive cybersecurity programme with a limited set of partners."

How powerful is Mythos?

The company detailed several alarming findings about the new model, including how it could follow instructions that encouraged it to break out of a virtual sandbox, meaning it bypassed the security, network or file system constraints imposed on the model.

The prompt asked Mythos to find a way to send a message if it could escape. "The model succeeded, demonstrating a potentially dangerous capability for circumventing our safeguards," Anthropic said, adding that the model then decided to go further.

"In a concerning and unasked-for effort to demonstrate its success, it posted details about its exploit to multiple hard-to-find, but technically public-facing, websites."

Anthropic is withholding some details about the cybersecurity vulnerabilities Mythos discovered, but did give some examples. It found errors in the Linux kernel, used in most of the world's servers, and autonomously chained them together in a way that would let a hacker take complete control of any machine running the Linux systems.

In another worrying observation, Mythos discovered a 27-year-old vulnerability in the open-source operating system OpenBSD that may allow hackers to crash any machine running it. OpenBSD is heavily used worldwide in specific, high-security, and critical infrastructure roles.

Who will it be released to?

Given these findings, Anthropic will only make Mythos Preview available to some of the world’s biggest cybersecurity and software firms.

Anthropic itself, as well as 11 other organisations (Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorganChase, the Linux Foundation, Microsoft, Nvidia and Palo Alto Networks) will get access to the model as part of a new Anthropic initiative named "Project Glasswing".

This allows the companies to use Mythos Preview as part of their security work, and Anthropic will share the takeaways from what the initiative finds.

The company named the cybersecurity project after the glasswing butterfly, saying it is a metaphor for how Mythos found vulnerabilities in plain sight and avoided harm by being transparent about the risks.

Anthropic said its "eventual goal is to enable our users to safely deploy Mythos-class models at scale, for cybersecurity purposes, but also for the myriad other benefits that such highly capable models will bring.

"To do so, that also means we need to make progress in developing cybersecurity (and other) safeguards that detect and block the model's most dangerous outputs," Anthropic wrote in its blog.

Is Anthropic in talks with the US government?

Anthropic said in its blog post that it has been in "ongoing discussions" with US government officials about Claude Mythos Preview and its "offensive and defensive cyber capabilities."

"The emergence of these cyber capabilities is another reason why the US and its allies must maintain a decisive lead in AI technology," Anthropic said. The company wrote that governments have an important role to play in maintaining the lead and assessing and mitigating national security risks associated with AI models.

"We are ready to work with local, state, and federal representatives to assist in these tasks."

The announcement comes as Anthropic and the Pentagon are in a legal standoff after the US Department of Defence labelled the company a supply chain risk in February over Anthropic's refusal to allow the use of its AI, Claude, in autonomous weapons and mass surveillance.

Do other AI tools have the same capabilities?

"More powerful models are going to come from us and from others, and so we do need a plan to respond to this," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said in a video, which was released alongside the Mythos announcement.

It could take between six and 18 months until other AI competitors release similar models, Logan Graham, head of Anthropic's frontier red team, which studies the implications of frontier AI models for cybersecurity, biosecurity, and autonomous systems, told Axios.

"It's very clear to us that we need to talk publicly about this," Graham noted. "The security industry needs to understand that these capabilities may come soon."

Public comfort with AI in health care falls, Ohio State survey finds



Among those who use AI, half of Americans rely on AI to make important health decisions



Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

News Package 

video: 

A new survey from The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center reveals a significant trend in health care: half of Americans are using artificial intelligence to make important health decisions without consulting their doctor. This rising reliance on AI for self-diagnosis is raising alarms among medical professionals who caution that the technology cannot replace human expertise.

view more 

Credit: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center





Artificial intelligence seems to be everywhere – in our jobs, in our homes and at the doctor’s office. While the use of AI grows, a new survey commissioned by The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center finds fewer Americans are open to AI being used in their health care. 

The national poll of 1,007 adults found only 42% are open to AI being used as part of their care compared to 52% when this survey first ran in 2024. The belief that AI can make some health processes more efficient also fell, going from 64% to 55%.

The drop is on par with the natural hype cycle of any kind of technology, according to Ravi Tripathi, MD, chief health informatics officer at Ohio State Wexner Medical Center.

“When we first see something new and shiny, we think it's going to fix the world and replace health care and solve all of our medical problems,” Tripathi said. “People are learning that there are pros and cons of artificial intelligence, where it has actual use and where it really doesn't have a place. I think over the next 2 to 5 years, we'll definitely start to see that increase again as people understand what the true use of artificial intelligence is and as it becomes just common day to all of health care technology.”

One task medical professionals say AI shouldn’t be used for is making health care decisions. The survey found 51% of adults used AI to make an important health decision without consulting a medical professional.

“We know that 2% of the time AI is going to be inaccurate or it will potentially hallucinate,” Tripathi said. “Physicians are not using AI 100%. We're not trusting it 100%. I would be really concerned about a patient who is following AI. The artificial intelligence doesn't understand your story.”

Tripathi suggests using AI in partnership with your doctor. AI can compile health data, explain test results and diagnoses, and help identify questions to ask your provider. Those who participated in the Ohio State survey agree:

  • 62% use AI to help understand symptoms before deciding whether to seek medical care
  • 44% use AI to help explain test results or a medical diagnosis
  • 25% use AI to compare treatment options or help make a treatment decision
  • 20% use AI to prepare for an upcoming medical appointment

“There's a strong value for using artificial intelligence as augmented intelligence,” Tripathi said. “Patients should have oversight of what the technology is doing but consult with their health care team for the final plan.”

What is the survey methodology?

This study was conducted by SSRS on its Opinion Panel Omnibus platform. The SSRS Opinion Panel Omnibus is a national, twice-per-month, probability-based survey. Data collection was conducted from January 16 – January 20, 2026, among a sample of 1,007 respondents. The survey was conducted via web (n=977) and telephone (n=30) and administered in English. The margin of error for total respondents is +/-3.5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All SSRS Opinion Panel Omnibus data are weighted to represent the target population of U.S. adults ages 18 or older.

###

People

 

An editorial by Tsu-Jae Liu on AI in engineering




PNAS Nexus
Tsu-Jae Liu 

image: 

Tsu-Jae Liu, President of the National Academy of Engineering

view more 

Credit: Christopher Michel





In this editorial, National Academy of Engineering President Tsu-Jae Liu presents a forward-looking perspective on the role of artificial intelligence in engineering. She describes AI not as a replacement for engineers, but as a tool that can expand their capacity to solve complex problems and develop innovative solutions that benefit society. By reducing routine tasks and supporting the design process, AI can improve efficiency and allow engineers to focus on higher-level, creative work. Liu also highlights its potential to make the profession more accessible to a broader range of students and early-career practitioners.
 
The editorial calls for a shift toward student-centered, multidisciplinary engineering education that integrates AI while addressing its limitations and societal implications. Liu underscores the responsibility of engineers to ensure that AI systems are reliable, transparent, and aligned with human values. She also emphasizes the importance of collaboration among employers, educators, and professional societies to create more flexible education and training pathways. Expanding participation in the engineering workforce will be critical to ensuring that AI-enabled engineers contribute to a safer, healthier, and more sustainable future for all.

The Persian-Parsi Identity – Analysis

Parsi wedding in India. Credit: The Parsees and the Towers of Silence at Bombay, India by William Thomas Fee, The National Geographic Magazine, Dec 1905, Wikipedia Commons


April 8, 2026
Gateway House
By Coomi Kapoor

With Iran in the news, the Parsi community in India is finding that their peripheral connection to the country evokes interest. Iran is the land of their very distant ancestry. Parsis are the followers of the prophet Zarathustra, who preached the ancient Persian faith, considered the world’s oldest monotheistic religion. It exercised a profound influence on later religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam on issues such as heaven, hell and the Day of Judgement.

Parsis see themselves as inheritors of the glorious traditions of two great Persian empires, the Achaemenid (550-330 BCE) and the Sassanid (224-651 CE). The ruins of Persepolis, standing majestically atop a hill, an architectural marvel of the ancient world, are a reminder of the legacy of the mighty Persian empire founded by Cyrus the Great was fortified by Darius the First. A replica of the `Cylinder of Cyrus’ from 539 BC is preserved in the United Nations building in New York and is acknowledged as the world’s first bill of human rights. The Old Testament refers to Cyrus, King of Persia, who conquered Babylon and set free the Jews who had lived in captivity for 70 years, allowing them to return to Jerusalem. The Book of Ezra refers to Cyrus as “Anointed of “The Lord”, a term normally reserved for Jewish prophets.

The Parsis fled Persia for India about a century after the Sassanid empire collapsed and Persia came under Arab control following the Battle of Nahavand in 642 CE. India and Persia were two ancient civilisations with a deep connection and similar roots. Their early dialects, Vedic Sanskrit and Avestan, are sister languages with many common words, sometimes with opposite meanings. Their religions have several common concepts, including the deification of fire. The commonalities between the two countries continue. The most obvious is an extensive vocabulary of familiar words: khush, jabardast, hafta, sal, pyar mohbat, muskeelian, meherbani, tehzeeb, etc.

Persian was the official language for the Indian courts, administration and literature under the Mughal emperors and even early British rule. The fabled mosques and palaces of Persia, with their brilliant colours and delicate workmanship, was the inspiration for India’s Mughal monuments. Great Persian poets like Firdosi, Omar Khayam, Hafez, Rumi and Sa’di had a huge impact on Indian literature. Despite their theocratic state, the Iranians have remained proud of their pre-Islamic heritage, whether it is Persepolis or the Tomb of Cyrus. The winged Farohar, symbol of the Zoroastrian deity Ahura Mazda, can be seen on some Islamic houses and across tourist shops in the country.

Anjuman Atash Bahram, Mumbai, with the winged Farohar symbol at the top. Image credits: Heritage India

Iranians constantly emphasised that they were Persian Aryans as opposed to being of Arabic origins like most of West Asia. Many Iranians steadfastly continue to celebrate the ancient spring festival of Navroze with flowers and fruit decorations despite the disapproval of hardline Muslim clerics.

The Persian civilisational journey is a contrast with that of Pakistan, which inherited the famous cradle of civilisation, Mohenjo Daro, in Sindh. Few Pakistanis visit this glorious site; the locals feel little ancestral connection to the site, preferring to trace their roots to West Asia and not to Mohenjo Daro, despite being of sub-continental ethnicity.

Persia and India’s impact on each other go back to antiquity. But the extent of the Persian influence on the Parsi identity is more difficult to quantify. Till the 19th century, and even today for formal occasions, the Parsis have elements of Persian style in their dress code, including covering their heads. Men still wear long, stiff, lacquered black pagris or black prayer caps to the fire temple. Parsi women took to the sari early, but Persian elegance with bold colours and refined design is seen in their Chinese-style embroidered gharas. Their success in cultivating fruit orchards, usually chikoos or mangoes. is often attributed to their Persian heritage.

Wedding photograph of a Parsi couple in traditional attire from the 1900’s. Image credits: Chitravali

Rock icon Freddie Mercury, though a Parsi who consciously tried to hide his identity, in an unguarded moment admitted that his flamboyant persona was because he was a “Persian Popinjay”.
Farrokh Bulsara, aka Freddie Mercury (centre), with his father, Bomi, and mother, Jer Bulsara, who were a part of the Parsi community from Bulsar (present-day Valsad), Gujarat. Image credits: Mid-Day

Persian influence is also glimpsed in Parsi food, where fruit and nuts are common embellishments in savoury dishes. The later Zoroastrian immigrants, the Iranis, who arrived in India in the 19th and 20th centuries looking for better opportunities, set up several bakeries and cafes in Mumbai in the style of those back in Iran. Most familiar Parsi names, such as Meher, Feroze, Hormaz, Darius, Jamshed, Dinshaw, Rustom, Sorab, Niloufer, Roxana et al., continue to be popular not just in Iran but all over West Asia. The names are from Avestan times and appear in Zoroastrian folklore and history.

Yazdani Bakery, 73 years old, is one of Mumbai’s iconic Iranian bakeries. Much loved by locals, it has been cherished through paintings and artworks, as seen on the left.

Despite this deep cultural connect, however, Parsis do not identify with Iran as the mother country. They left for India in the eighth century after more than a 100 years of religious persecution following the Arab invasion of Persia and assimilated completely with India, even while rigidly maintaining their own identity and religion. The local people named the new arrivals Parsis since they came from the Pars region in Iran. Zoroastrians who left Iran, however, retained ties with their co-religionists back home over the centuries through messages known as Rivayats. But while initially it was the Indian side which deferred to the spiritual advice from their fellow believers in Iran, gradually the tables turned as the Parsis became more prosperous and influential and the Iranian Zoroastrians more marginalised.

For instance, when the Iranian Zoroastrians pointed out the inaccuracies in the Parsi calendar, with spring falling in August, many Parsi scholars declined to own their mistake in calculation. While back in Iran and much of Central Asia, modern-day Navroze and spring are ushered in on the basis of the vernal equinox and not calendars. Orthodox Parsis stick dogmatically to their own calendar. They did eventually reach a compromise – but only to dub the new equinox festival as Jamshedji Navroz.

In the mid-nineteenth century, prominent Parsis, enlisting the help of the British government, sought to alleviate the lot of their Zoroastrian brethren in Iran by getting the jizya tax – levied for centuries by the Muslim rulers on all non-Muslim communities such as Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians was abolished by 1882, encouraging them to settle in India with their assistance.

The 20th century’s self-anointed Iranian monarchs, Reza Shah Pahlavi and his son Mohammed Reza Shah II, impressed with the achievements of the progressive Parsis in India, attempted to persuade them to return to Iran. Though Parsis often referred approvingly to II as “apro Shah” (Our Shah) since his family has assumed the title Pahlavi from pre-Islamic Persia and he celebrated the 2,500-year anniversary of Cyrus’s dynasty with jaw-dropping extravagance, he could not be enticed to leave India. The Shah, by playing up Persia’s ancient glory, only further alienated the Muslim theocracy and may have contributed to the Islamic revolution.[1]

In 19th-century British Raj India, Christian missionaries who converted a Parsi boy taunted the Parsis, suggesting that they recited their prayers by rote without understanding them. This motivated the Parsis to take renewed interest in learning the dead languages of Persia, in which their scriptures are written. The generations of Parsi boys were made to study the language of their liturgical texts in Avestan, the extinct Persian language dating back to 1500 BCE.

It has similarities to Vedic Sanskrit and Pahlavi spoken from the 3rd to the 7th century CE. Today, Zoroastrianism and the early Persian language are taught in a few educational institutions in India, such as the K.R. Cama Oriental Institute in Mumbai and the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune, and some centres in the West, such as SOAS in London, are funded by Parsi trusts. But in present-day Iran, there seems to be little interest in learning this ancient language.

[1] Avesta.org. “The Persian Rivayats.” Edited by Ervad Bamanji Nusserwanji Dhabhar.
https://www.avesta.org/rivayats/rivayats.htm


About the author: 

Coomi Kapoor is the author of The Tatas, Freddie Mercury and Other Bawas: An Intimate History of the Parsis.

Source: This article was written for Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations.

Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations is a foreign policy think-tank established in 2009, to engage India’s leading corporations and individuals in debate and scholarship on India’s foreign policy and its role in global affairs. Gateway House’s studies programme will be at the heart of the institute’s scholarship, with original research by global and local scholars in Geo-economics, Geopolitics, Foreign Policy analysis, Bilateral relations, Democracy and nation-building, National security, ethnic conflict and terrorism, Science, technology and innovation, and Energy and Environment.
As Emerging Markets Attract More Nonbank Capital, They Also Face New Challenges – Analysis

April 8, 2026 
By Salih Fendoglu, Mahvash S. Qureshi and Felix Suntheim
published by IMF Blog

Emerging-market firms and governments seeking funding from abroad are increasingly looking beyond banks to nonbank sources. As we discuss in an analytical chapter of the latest Global Financial Stability Report, this trend delivers important benefits but also poses new risks—notably greater vulnerability to a sudden reversal in capital flows when global shocks occur.

Since the global financial crisis, portfolio flows to emerging markets have increased eightfold, reaching about $4 trillion in cumulative terms, compared with a more modest increase in bank flows. Most of these inflows take the form of debt: portfolio debt liabilities now average about 15 percent of gross domestic product in emerging markets, up from around 9 percent in 2006. Eighty percent of this capital is provided by nonbanks, including investment funds, hedge funds, pension funds and insurance companies, twice the share seen 20 years ago.


For borrowers in emerging markets, the advantages can be significant. Plentiful capital can lower financing costs, supporting higher investment and stronger productivity growth. Market-based finance can help firms integrate into global value chains, a key driver of exports, by easing access to funding for trade, working capital, and other needs that increase their productive capacity. Over time, sustained access to international capital markets can also help deepen domestic financial systems and support long-term financial development.

At the same time, portfolio flows to emerging markets tend to be more volatile than bank flows and are increasingly sensitive to global risk conditions, as our analysis shows. Abrupt retrenchments can intensify external financing pressures, raise borrowing costs, and trigger sharp currency depreciations, leading to financial strains that weigh on economic growth. These risks have come to the fore in the context of the war in the Middle East, as several emerging markets are experiencing a reversal of capital flows from nonresident nonbank investors.


To gauge these effects, we use a one-standard-deviation increase in a widely used measure of global risk appetite, the CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX. This is roughly equivalent to the measure’s surge during the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate increases in early 2022. Such a jump is associated with portfolio debt outflows from emerging markets of about 1 percent of quarterly GDP on average (corresponding to a 0.3 standard deviation decline in flows relative to GDP). Outflows from investment funds are roughly twice as large. These effects are likely larger in countries with weaker fundamentals, such as higher public debt burdens, less adequate international reserve buffers, and weaker institutional quality.


Why are portfolio debt flows from nonbank financial investors so volatile? The reasons vary across investor groups.

Investment funds, which account for the bulk of portfolio investments in emerging markets, can be exposed to sudden redemption pressures, forcing them to sell assets quickly. Benchmark-driven strategies, such as those used by passive funds and most exchange-traded funds, automatically adjust portfolios when index weights change, increasing the risk of synchronized asset sales. Hedge funds, an increasingly important investor group in some emerging markets, often use leverage to amplify returns.


Such strategies can create vulnerabilities, as rising market volatility may trigger margin calls or risk limits, forcing asset sales and amplifying price pressures. Moreover, post‑2008 regulatory reforms that constrained the risk-taking capacity of global banks have likely pushed riskier borrowers toward nonbank financing. The result: reduced sensitivity of bank‑based financing to global risk, and increased sensitivity for market‑based nonbank financing.

Among nonbank investors, hedge funds and mutual funds are most sensitive to changes in global risk, while other investor groups such as pension funds and insurance companies tend to be more stable. For example, a VIX surge is associated with a decline of 1.3 percent in hedge funds’ holdings of emerging market securities. Mutual funds also retrench, but by a smaller amount—around 0.6 percent—broadly in line with the average response of all nonresident nonbank financial investors. By contrast, holdings by insurance companies and pension funds do not show a statistically significant response to the same shock.


Private credit, a fast-growing and relatively opaque segment of nonbank finance, poses additional challenges. In emerging markets, private credit—mainly direct lending to companies by nonbank investors—has expanded rapidly, with estimated assets under management increasing fivefold over the past decade to between $50 billion and $100 billion. While private credit can broaden access to capital, gaps in transparency and data availability may make it hard to quickly identify vulnerabilities or potential risks to financial stability.
Building resilience

Our analysis underscores the need for emerging market policy makers to closely monitor the composition of the nonbank investor base when assessing financial stability risks. Strengthening institutional quality and maintaining adequate fiscal and external buffers can also help mitigate capital flow volatility and attract more stable, long-term external investment.


In addition, a combination of measures—including monetary policy and exchange rate flexibility, complemented where appropriate by foreign exchange intervention—and macroprudential tools can help contain vulnerabilities and protect against potential risks. The IMF’s Integrated Policy Framework provides guidance on calibrating the appropriate mix and sequencing of these policy tools.

Systemwide stress tests, which simulate the impact of severe but plausible economic shocks, can further help gauge the resilience of the financial system to sudden capital flow reversals and ensure that financial institutions hold adequate capital and liquidity buffers.

Finally, stronger international cooperation is essential to close regulatory and data gaps and to limit the undesirable cross-border effects of global financial shocks.

—This article is based on Chapter 2 of the April 2026 Global Financial Stability Report, Capital Flows to Emerging Markets: The Role of Global Nonbank Investors.


About the authors:

Salih Fendoglu is a Senior Financial Sector Expert in the Monetary and Capital Markets Department of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He works in the Global Financial Stability Analysis Division, where he regularly contributes to the thematic chapters of the Global Financial Stability Report. He has also participated in the IMF’s Article IV surveillance and the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) for Japan.
 
Mahvash S. Qureshi is an Assistant Director and Division Chief in the IMF’s Monetary and Capital Markets Department, where she heads the Global Financial Stability Analysis Division and oversees production of the analytical chapters of the Global Financial Stability Report.

Felix Suntheim is a Deputy Division Chief in the Global Financial Stability Analysis Division of the IMF’s Monetary and Capital Markets Department. Previously, he worked in the Economics Department at the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority.


Source: This article was published by IMF Blog