Tuesday, April 14, 2026

 

Sunbirds suck their nectar, in dramatic contrast to hummingbirds, which sop it up



Sunbirds employ tongue suctioning, which is unique among vertebrates.



University of California - Berkeley

Sunbird tongue suctioning 

video: 

A sunbird sticks its tongue into an artificial flower (top) and uses tongue suctioning to draw out nectar (bottom).

view more 

Credit: David Cuban, Brown University





While we often think of hummingbirds as sucking nectar from flowers, they’re not sucking the way we suction juice through a straw — they’re really sponging up nectar with their tongues and squeezing the juice into their mouths by compressing their tongues with their beaks.

Humans are naturally able from birth to use mouth suction to draw in liquid, but it’s not easy if you don’t have lips to create an air-tight seal, and few animals besides mammals have lips.

But a new study by current and former University of California, Berkeley biologists found that sunbirds, the African and Asian counterparts of the nectar-sipping hummingbirds of the Americas, do use suction to slurp nectar. They’re the first animals known to employ their tongues to suction up liquids.

The results highlight the fact that nature often finds different solutions to similar problems — in this case, how to use a long, tubular and often curved beak to extract sustenance from deep within a flower. It’s referred to as convergent evolution.

“It's just a really amazing example of the power and beauty of convergent evolution, where in nature we have two organisms filling the same ecological role, but when you look in detail, they're achieving that outcome in two completely different ways,” said Rauri Bowie, UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology and a study author. “In our case, we're seeing a mechanism that is completely novel in vertebrates and a remarkable example of innovation.”

The proof comes from experiments conducted in Africa and Indonesia using high-speed cameras installed adjacent to 3D printed artificial flowers, plus microCT scans of sunbirds obtained in UC Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ). The results were reported last month in the journal Current Biology, in a paper led by first author and Berkeley alum David Cuban, now a postdoctoral fellow at Brown University.

“I am fascinated by the phenomena of convergent evolution,” Cuban said. “Hummingbirds and sunbirds — and some other nectar-feeding birds — have similar morphology, coloration, behavior and ecological niches, but once we zoom in on something specific, in this case their feeding mechanism, we find that they use completely distinct mechanisms.”

Lapping, licking and sucking

Most vertebrates use lapping or licking to take in liquids with their tongues (think dogs and cats). But a few animals employ suction. Fish, for example, inflate their mouths to suction in food. Butterflies use a muscular pump to suction up nectar and pollen. Pigeons suction water from pools, though only by submerging their beaks in the liquid and using their tongue as a piston. These options are not available to nectar feeders, who stick their tongues into the sweet liquid.

For nectar-eating birds — nectarivores — it was thought until recently that they used capillary action to passively tap a pool of nectar. Surface tension was thought to pull liquid into their tube-like beaks or tongues.

But many biologists doubted this, because using capillary action is a slow way to take in calories. For frenetic fliers like hummingbirds and sunbirds, this would not provide sufficient energy.

“When you think about it, there's no way they would ingest enough nectar, given that sunbirds and hummingbirds have this incredibly beautiful ornamentation that they're very actively displaying, using a high calorie intake to fuel their lifestyles,” Bowie said.

Nearly 10 years ago, former UC Berkeley Miller Postdoctoral Fellow Alejandro Rico-Guevara demonstrated with high-speed video that hummingbirds don’t use capillary action. Instead, they compress their tongues before sticking them into a pool of nectar. As the tongue expands, nectar fills the pores as if it were a sponge. As the birds retract the tongue, they squeeze it between the upper and lower bill, wringing out the nectar like the mangle of an old-fashioned washing machine. Hummingbirds do this repeatedly, and it’s about 10 times faster than using capillary action.

Cuban, a former UC Berkeley undergraduate and then master’s student in mechanical engineering, doubted that sunbirds used capillary action either, and set out to prove it. He had become fascinated by the convergent evolution of nectar-feeding birds during an ornithology class taught by Bowie and teaching assistant Cynthia Wang-Claypool, then a Berkeley graduate student. Seeing hummingbird and sunbird specimens laid out next to one another in the MVZ, he said, “I knew I had to look into the convergent evolution of nectar-feeding birds, and I wanted to use my background in mechanical engineering to do so.”

One tip-off that sunbirds were not feeding by capillary action came from early high-speed video analyses. Cuban saw bubbles around the tongue, which would interfere with surface tension, though not suction. Sunbirds also keep their beaks slightly open when drinking nectar, whereas hummingbirds do not.

3D-printed flowers

Working as a doctoral student with Rico-Guevara at the University of Washington in Seattle, he traveled to South Africa and Sulawesi in Indonesia to conduct experiments with seven sunbird species, using high-speed cameras to film birds visiting 3D-printed fake flowers filled with sugar water. He modified techniques that Rico-Guevara had originated to study hummingbird feeding, initially in his native Colombia.

Cuban discovered that sunbirds in Asia, where they originated, and in Africa, which they subsequently colonized, use the same tongue technique to draw in nectar. Their tongues have a V-shaped trough at its base. As the bird sticks its tongue into a pool of nectar, it presses its base against the top beak, creating an air-tight seal. As the bird gradually pulls its tongue back in, this creates suction that draws in liquid via the tongue groove. When the seal breaks, the bird swallows the nectar.

“Pushing the base of the tongue against the top of the beak — that's what is really creating that hermetic seal,” Bowie said. “It's the interaction between the tongue and the beak that creates that negative pressure.”

MicroCT scans by Wang-Claypool, now with the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, provided anatomical confirmation.

“They provided the evidence we needed that the structure of the tongue differs from hummingbirds, with sunbirds having special flexible flaps at the base of the tongue so that when the tongue pushes up against the top of the beak, it generates a tight seal,” Bowie said.

The researchers continue to explore the differences between sunbirds and hummingbirds and convergent evolution among nectar eaters — a lifestyle that evolved at least 30 times among animals, Bowie said. A native of South Africa, Bowie started working on sunbirds as part of his Ph.D. thesis at the University of Cape Town and has continued to explore the diversification and evolutionary ecology of these remarkable birds over the 20 years he has been a member of the Berkeley faculty.

“I'm interested in nectarivory as a lifestyle, looking at it from the point of view of the diversification of these species, how they've adapted to different kinds of habitats, including the extensive radiation by both sunbirds and hummingbirds into mountains,” he said.

“By studying the physical interactions, or biomechanics, of organisms we can better understand how the immutable laws of physics are shaping the many diverse adaptations found across the tree of life,” Cuban said.

The work was funded in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1457845). Co-authors with Cuban, Bowie, Rico-Guevera and Wang-Claypool are Yohanna Yohanna of the National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia, Colleen Downs and Steven Johnson of the University of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa and Fabian Brau of the Free University of Brussels in Belgium.

A greater double-collared sunbird (Cinnyris afer), one of the South African sunbirds studied.

Credit

Keith Barnes

CT scans of sunbird and hummingbird beaks 

CT scans reveal striking bill and tongue differences between the olive sunbird (Cyanomitra olivacea, top) and Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna, bottom). Cross sections at several places along the bill show that, from base to tip, the sunbird tongue shifts from a U-shaped trough to a closed tube, while the hummingbird tongue transforms from two solid rods into twin hollow tubes. The U-shaped base of the sunbird tongue interacts with the upper bill to create the suction the birds use to sip nectar from flowers.

Credit

Cynthia Wang-Claypool/UC Berkeley

 

UCF expert plays key role in international research to combat dengue fever, zika



As a mosquito-borne virus expert, UCF Assistant Professor Dr. James Earnest is leveraging his knowledge to lead two research projects studying immune responses to the dengue and Zika viruses.



UCF College of Medicine

Dr. Earnest and research assistants 

image: 

From left to right: UCF research associate Daniel Limonta,UCF Assistant Professor James Earnest and biomedical sciences doctoral student Bruno Pinheiro ’25.

view more 

Credit: Photo by UCF College of Medicine.





Nearly half of the world’s citizens live in areas with a risk of catching dengue fever, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As the mosquito-borne illness rapidly spreads, especially in the Americas and Caribbean, a UCF College of Medicine researcher is playing a crucial role in finding solutions.

Dr. James Earnest, an assistant professor at the Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, is leading two new research projects to examine how humans build an immune response to dengue and the Zika virus over time, in pursuit of creating better preventative measures.

Tackling a Global Problem

Both dengue and Zika are carried by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which has expanded its habitat from Africa to tropical, subtropical and even temperate areas worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, dengue infections in humans climbed from 505,430 in 2000 to 14.6 million in 2024, an increase of more than 2,700%.

Dengue can be asymptomatic or cause severe pain, fatigue and high fever. Repeated infections can be fatal.

Since 2017, there have been few cases of Zika recorded in the U.S., but the disease persists sporadically in Africa, the Americas and Asia. The virus’ biggest health concern is for pregnant women because contracting Zika can increase risks for serious congenital birth defects.

While people in Mexico and Uganda may benefit from this research, Florida’s location as a worldwide travel destination adds to the growing need for solutions. U.S. dengue cases are on the rise and have been reported in Florida, California, Texas and Hawaii. Most are related to travel. Dengue is also prevalent in Puerto Rico.

“With more favorable temperatures and with people traveling around the globe these days, the threat to the U.S. is growing over time,” Dr. Earnest said. “I think, especially here in Florida, the potential for these mosquitoes to live in these areas and start transmitting these diseases in the very near future is high. UCF recognizes that this is an important avenue of research for this region, and so we want to be the leaders at looking at these viruses.”

How the UCF Research Works

Dr. Earnest’s lab is focused on how the immune system responds to mosquito-borne viruses. Before arriving at UCF in 2024, he tracked dengue via longitudinal sampling in Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula.

Dr. Earnest is collaborating with the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) through a five-year $970,813 subcontract, part of a larger grant awarded to UVRI from Wellcome, a London-based charitable organization that supports science to solve urgent health challenges. The project aims to study immune system and antibody responses to dengue and Zika in large cohorts of people in Uganda and in Mexico.

UCF will also collaborate with Emory University on a $578,157 grant from the National Institutes of Health, with Dr. Earnest subcontracted to Emory to study whether combining two current dengue inoculations used in Brazil gives humans better protection against repeat infections.

“It's important that we understand what good and bad immune responses look like to these viruses,” Dr. Earnest said. “When we know those factors, then we can try to steer people in the right direction so that their antibodies will protect them from disease.”

Dr. Earnest will coordinate with teams in other countries to regularly collect blood samples and measure antibody production to get a comprehensive look at how different people’s bodies react to dengue and Zika over time. The samples will be collected and processed in Mexico and Uganda, and Earnest will analyze the results in his lab.

“I think what's unique about this work is that we’re following people over time and not necessarily just when they get sick,” Dr. Earnest said.

His research focuses on B cells, which are white blood cells that make antibodies and help the body remember how to fight infections. By tracking how people’s B cells change over time, his team aims to understand how immune responses differ across regions.

In a related project with Emory, the lab will identify the most effective memory B cells and antibodies induced by two existing methods of inoculation for dengue, then test whether combining those methods in Brazilian trial participants produces a stronger immune response.

Students Aim to Save Lives Through Lab Work

With this new research, Dr. Earnest’s lab has welcomed two new UCF students who have personal experience with dengue and Zika.

Maiesha Mahmood, a second-year biotechnology master’s student, is from Bangladesh, where the threat of dengue looms.

“I have been around dengue a lot growing up,” Mahmood said. “I know people who have been in hospital with severe forms of dengue, and people who've passed away suddenly. People become scared of mosquitos and dengue.”

She said she hopes UCF’s research will someday save lives.

“Back in Bangladesh, we don't really have a lot of facilities that can support virology research,” she said. “It was a huge opportunity to be able to come here and be able to work with Dr. Earnest. I want to continue looking into these kinds of viruses and find a way to help people who keep suffering from these diseases.”

Bruno Pinheiro ’25, a first-year Ph.D. candidate, joined Dr. Earnest’s lab to further his education and hopes research will help people close to him.

“My family is from Brazil and so Zika was a very big thing for them,” said Pinheiro, who earned his bachelor’s degree in biotechnology “It’s great to work on something that you can feel will impact the community that you're a part of.”

Researcher Credentials:

Dr. Earnest joined UCF’s College of Medicine in 2024 as an assistant professor in the Immunity and Pathogenesis Division. He earned his doctorate in microbiology and immunology from Loyola University Chicago in 2017. He performed postdoctoral research at Washington University in St. Louis studying antibody responses to mosquito-borne viruses and Emory University where he managed clinical field trials in Latin America.

Funding and Disclosure:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number U01AI186860. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Monday, April 13, 2026

 

Think that conversation will be boring? Science says think again



People underestimate how enjoyable everyday conversations really are, study says




American Psychological Association






The small talk you try to avoid because you think it will be boring may actually be more enjoyable than you think, and good for you as well, according to research published by the American Psychological Association. 

“We tend to assume that if a topic sounds dull, the conversation will be dull too,” said Elizabeth Trinh, MA, a doctoral student at the University of Michigan and lead author of the research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. “But that’s not what people actually experience.” 

In nine experiments involving 1,800 participants, researchers found that people consistently underestimated how interesting and enjoyable conversations about boring topics would be.  

Participants were asked to predict how much they would enjoy talking about specific topics they identified as boring. Topics were many and varied, including World Wars I and II, non-fiction books, the stock market, cats, and vegan diets. In some cases, participants were asked to suggest a topic they found boring (responses included such topics as math, onions and Pokemon). Participants then had real conversations with strangers or friends, in person or online. Afterward, they reported how much they enjoyed the conversations. 

Across experiments, the pattern was clear: people expected the conversations to be fairly dull, but afterward they reported enjoying them much more than they had predicted. This pattern held even when both parties agreed the topic was boring. 

“We were both surprised and excited by how robust the effect was,” said Trinh. “People consistently expected conversations about seemingly boring topics to be less interesting than they turned out to be.” 

The reason may be that people focus too much on the topic itself, according to Trinh. Before a conversation begins, the topic is the easiest thing to judge. But once people start talking, the interaction becomes more important. 

“What really drives enjoyment is engagement,” she said. “Feeling heard, responding to each other, and discovering unexpected details about someone’s life can make even a mundane topic meaningful.” 

The findings matter because social connection plays a key role in mental and physical health. Strong relationships are linked to greater well-being and lower risk of loneliness. If people avoid conversations because they expect them to be boring, they may miss easy chances to connect. 

“If we skip talking to a coworker at the coffee machine, a neighbor in the elevator, or a stranger at an event, we may be missing small moments of connection,” said Trinh. “Even a brief conversation about everyday life may be more rewarding than we expect.”

Article: “Conversations About Boring Topics Are More Interesting Than We Think” by Elizabeth Trinh, MA, University of Michigan Stephen M Ross School of Business, Nicole Thio, MS, Cornell University Industrial and Labor Relations School, and Nadav Klein, PhD, INSEAD - Europe Campus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, published online April 13, 2026. 

Contact: Elizabeth Trinh can be reached via email at entrinh@umich.edu

The American Psychological Association, in Washington, D.C., is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States. APA’s membership includes 190,000 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 54 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 60 state, territorial and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance the creation, communication and application of psychological knowledge to benefit society and improve lives.

Cacti fungal endophytes may help cacao tolerate drought


American Society for Microbiology






Key Points:

  • The beans of Theobroma cacao are used to make chocolate and other products, but these plants are threatened by increased drought associated with climate change.
  • Researchers identified microbes in drought-resistant plants, like cacti, that live in extreme environments and found 5 fungal endophytes, which live harmlessly inside plants, associated with drought tolerance.
  • Cacao plants grown in soil enriched with these endophytes showed greater drought tolerance.

Washington, D.C.—Beans of the cacao plant, Theobroma cacao, are used in chocolates, pharmaceuticals and other products, but they’re under threat. Increased drought associated with climate change has already begun to stress cacao-growing regions of Colombia and other countries, and models predict it will get worse. In recent research, scientists have found that fungal endophytes—microbes that live in a host plant without causing harm—may offer a novel strategy for boosting drought tolerance in cacao. 

For a study published this week in mSphere, mycologists added fungal endophytes from a species of cactus to the soil of growing cacao plants. They found that the inoculated plants showed less negative levels of leaf water potential, possibly due to better control of the stomatal conductance, which is a key determinant of photosynthesis. These alterations could help the plant retain more water as it grows. 

“We are losing a lot of species due to climate change,” said Silvia Restrepo, Ph.D., senior author on the study and a plant pathologist at the Boyce Thompson Institute in Ithaca, New York, and the Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Colombia. The new study, she said, shows how scientists can harness strategies by looking for solutions that have evolved in other organisms. 

Restrepo has long studied the effects of fungal endophytes, isolated from plants growing in extreme conditions in Colombia, on threatened crops. In previous work, her lab found endophytes that could improve the growth of potatoes. More recently, she said, she’s been working with cacao growers on drought resistance. 

For the new work, she and her collaborators collected root samples in 2 locations in Colombia from 12 Stenocereus cacti, a tree-like genus characterized by its ability to thrive in arid, hot conditions. They isolated more than 20 fungal endophytes from the samples and subjected the fungi to drought conditions. Five of the isolates lost less than 20% of their total biomass. The researchers added these isolates to soil of growing cacao plants and compared them to cacao plants growing in ordinary soil, then subjected both to drought conditions. 

The endophytes did not affect the height of the plants, but treated cacao plants developed more and larger leaves. In addition, plants inoculated with endophytes were better able to recover from the drought conditions. Endophytes from the genera Fusarium and Phoma also promoted plant growth under non-drought conditions.

Restrepo said scientists don’t know exactly why the endophytes help cacao with drought resistance. “The fine details are an open question,” she said. However, their analyses and observations suggest that the endophytes help the cacao plant manage the stomata, tiny pores that open and close to allow gas exchange, to avoid the rapid release of water vapor. 

She suspects the endophytes may also confer similar benefits to other crops. “It’s easy to test in tomato, potato and other crops,” she said. Her group is also developing an endophyte-based soil additive that farmers could use to help their crops better survive drought in Colombia and beyond. “We have to look at all possibilities to help the crops fighting against climate change.”
 

###

The American Society for Microbiology is one of the largest professional societies dedicated to the life sciences and is composed of over 38,000 scientists and health practitioners. ASM's mission is to promote and advance the microbial sciences.  

ASM advances the microbial sciences through conferences, publications, certifications, educational opportunities and advocacy efforts. It enhances laboratory capacity around the globe through training and resources. It provides a network for scientists in academia, industry and clinical settings. Additionally, ASM promotes a deeper understanding of the microbial sciences to all audiences.