Monday, May 11, 2026

Ni

Biodiversity costs of clean energy’s nickel rush modelled in global study




University of Queensland






Meeting future nickel demand for stainless steel and clean energy technologies will require tough decisions with potential environmental trade-offs, a new study has found.

Dr Jayden Hyman from The University of Queensland’s School of the Environment led an international analysis of known nickel deposits, current mining and demand forecasts.

Dr Hyman said by 2050 about half of mined nickel supply is likely to come from areas ranked in the top 10 per cent globally for their importance to biodiversity conservation.

“Nickel is in everything from steel in infrastructure to the pots and pans in our kitchens, and demand is surging for clean energy especially to make batteries for electric vehicles,” Dr Hyman said.

“But the decisions being made now about where to source nickel could lock in impacts for decades in some of Earth’s most biodiverse and carbon-rich ecosystems.

“Up to 83 per cent of nickel supply could come from laterite deposits typically beneath tropical rainforests but accessing them requires large scale clearing – most notably, this is accelerating in Indonesia.

“Many of these deposits are also near the coast, and mining them risks polluting nearby waters including what’s known as the Coral Triangle to Australia’s north, which is celebrated as one of the world's most biodiverse marine regions.

“We have built a model to help plan for nickel to be sourced responsibly, taking into consideration the ecological importance of land and ocean regions.

“This framework helps us understand and model different scenarios as well as the trade-offs that might need to be made.”

The analysis was completed using a modelling framework developed at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Institute for Sustainable Futures and a nickel dataset curated with researchers from UQ’s Sustainable Minerals Institute.

Dr Stephen Northey from UTS said it evaluates how future mine development may occur under different demand scenarios, such as those developed by the International Energy Agency.

“The model can show how many new nickel mines will be needed for the energy transition to meet Net Zero emissions and where these may be located,” Dr Northey said.

The analysis also modelled what would happen if mining were avoided in areas most important to conserve biodiversity.

It found excluding the top 10 per cent of environmentally sensitive areas would significantly reduce risks to biodiversity but could lead to nickel shortfalls of up to 18 per cent of demand by 2050, unless new resources are identified and alternative supplies are developed.

The study found that although recycling and low-nickel battery technologies were important for reducing the long-term need for mining, there was a need for new mines in the near term.

Deep-sea deposits could help address the risk of shortfalls in the absence of new resource discoveries on land, but their economic and environmental viability required further evaluation.

Dr Hyman said it was important to find optimal pathways as a global community.

“This is a call to action to work together to develop strategies for environmentally responsible mineral supply so we can build the clean energy future we need,” he said.

“With thoughtful planning and a focus on protecting areas most important for biodiversity and exploring alternatives, nickel supply can be secured with fewer ecological impacts.

“Requiring stronger sustainability standards on supply chains that use nickel could tip the balance back towards more responsible producers that generally have higher costs.

“We have seen low‑cost laterite supply from Indonesia and other tropical locations driving mine closures and production suspensions in regions like Australia.

“Better transparency about the environmental cost of expanding nickel mining is needed, along with research into alternatives to ensure nickel supply doesn’t undermine global biodiversity and climate goals.”

Read the research published in Nature Ecology and Evolution.


 

 

Radical shifts to sustainability call for a new kind of legal thinking





University of Eastern Finland





Individual environmental laws, such as those related to the climate or nature conservation, are not sufficient on their own to resolve environmental crises. Led by the University of Eastern Finland, a new international study calls for decisive changes to the core structures of legal systems in their entirety.

The study sheds light on where legal pressure for change should be directed in order to address global environmental crises, and how the impacts of change can be assessed more effectively than before. The findings suggest that legislative tools often fall short because the functioning of legal systems is examined in an overly simplified manner. Profound rethinking of legal systems is needed both in Finland and elsewhere in the world.

Published in Nature Sustainability, the study introduces a novel theory of change and an approach to the development of legal systems and legislative impact assessment. In particular, it responds to the escalating crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution as part of a broader sustainability transformation.

“In addition to wide-ranging legal reforms, change can be instigated by applying pressure to the key nodes within legal systems, where even small adjustments can have far-reaching consequences,” says Niko Soininen, Professor of Environmental Law at the University of Eastern Finland.

Too much attention is being paid to individual environmental laws

The climate, biodiversity and pollution crises have intensified, and seven of the Earth’s nine planetary boundaries have already been exceeded. Managing these crises requires legal change at a time when law is both a part of the problem and a part of the solution, as current regulation, in part, sustains overproduction and overconsumption. At present, however, attention is too heavily focused on individual environmental laws, based on the assumption that they alone would be sufficient to resolve environmental crises.

“In a complex legal system, this is not the case, nor does the legislator have direct means to change the way the entire system works. This leads us to consider how changes to legal systems should be implemented in order for them to be effective, and how the impacts of complex systemic change can be assessed.”

Small, strategic regulatory changes can trigger macro-level shifts

The model developed in the study is based on the idea that carefully targeted changes to individual regulations can generate wide-ranging effects across legal systems, with ramifications for the economy and society.

In the model, the core of Western legal systems is structured around six key concepts: property, contract, liability, authority, legal personhood and legal certainty. According to the study, changes targeted at these concepts may be decisive in addressing the challenges a radical shift to sustainability requires.

The legal system model developed in the study makes it possible to assess broader, system-level impacts of individual legislative changes. The study also outlines a new perspective on legislative impact assessment based on complexity theory, enabling more robust evaluation of the societal, economic and ecological effects of legal change.

The study was conducted as part of the Resilience of Complex Legal Systems in Sustainability Transformation project, RELIEF, which is funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Research Council of Finland, and as part of the KATKO project funded by the Saastamoinen Foundation. The projects examine how legal systems can support ambitious environmental sustainability objectives, such as mitigating climate change, protecting and restoring biodiversity and reducing pollution, without compromising the rule of law, fundamental rights and human rights. The premise is that the sustainability transformation challenges the structures of the legal system that shape economic and social processes within society.

 

How tetracycline molecules shape their own capture on biochar




Maximum Academic Press






Studying five common tetracycline congeners on rice-straw-derived biochar, the researchers found that hydrogen bonding between the antibiotics’ amide –NH2 groups and carbonyl C=O groups on biochar is the dominant adsorption mechanism. They also showed that substituent groups on the antibiotic molecules can either strengthen or weaken this interaction, producing a clear adsorption-rate order of doxycycline > minocycline > tetracycline > methacycline > oxytetracycline.

Tetracycline antibiotics are widely used in medicine, livestock production, and aquaculture, yet a substantial fraction enters the environment unmetabolized, where it can disrupt ecosystems and promote antibiotic resistance. These compounds have been detected in wastewater plants, rivers, and surface waters, and conventional filtration methods often fail to remove them effectively. Biochar has emerged as a promising low-cost adsorbent for tetracycline removal, and its performance has been widely reported. However, earlier studies largely treated tetracyclines as a single class, overlooking the fact that even small structural differences among congeners can alter charge behavior, hydrophobicity, electron distribution, and binding to biochar surfaces. This knowledge gap has limited the rational design of biochar materials for targeted pollutant capture.

study (DOI:10.48130/bchax-0026-0007) published in Biochar X on 13 February 2026 by Jing Fang’s team, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, offers a route to designing more selective, high-efficiency biochar adsorbents for removing antibiotic pollutants from wastewater and contaminated aquatic environments.

The team prepared BC700 by pyrolyzing rice straw at 700 °C and tested its interactions with tetracycline, oxytetracycline, minocycline, methacycline, and doxycycline. Batch adsorption experiments examined equilibrium behavior and pH effects, while FTIR and two-dimensional FTIR correlation spectroscopy tracked how nitrogen- and oxygen-containing functional groups changed before and after adsorption. These measurements showed that at low tetracycline concentration, the antibiotic’s –NH2 group preferentially bonded first to carboxyl C=O sites and then to ketone or ester C=O groups. At higher concentrations, this selectivity became less distinct, suggesting that crowding at the biochar surface reduced site preference. The experiments also confirmed that pH strongly affected adsorption, with low-concentration tetracycline being removed efficiently across pH 3–9, while higher concentrations showed more variable removal. The researchers then modeled adsorption kinetics and found that all five antibiotics followed a double-exponential model, indicating both fast and slow adsorption phases. Doxycycline and minocycline adsorbed the fastest, while oxytetracycline was slowest. To explain these differences, the team combined density functional theory calculations, literature-derived molecular descriptors, principal component analysis, and multiple linear regression. They compiled 11 structural descriptors, including orbital energies, dipole moment, polarizability, dissociation constants, and hydrophobicity. The analysis showed that electron-donating R1 substituents such as −N(CH3)2 and favorable R3 substituents enhanced BC700-induced electronic polarization, increased electron density around –NH2, and strengthened hydrogen bonding. In contrast, electron-withdrawing or unfavorable R2 substituents hindered these processes. The resulting predictive models linked structural principal components to adsorption-rate constants with very high goodness of fit, showing that molecular structure can be used to forecast adsorption behavior quantitatively.

Overall, the study shows that tetracycline removal by biochar is not controlled by a single universal mechanism, but by a structure-dependent interaction landscape in which functional groups and electronic features determine how strongly each congener binds. By revealing why some tetracyclines adsorb faster than others and by building predictive structure–adsorption models, the work provides both a mechanistic foundation and a practical framework for tailoring biochar adsorbents to remove antibiotic contaminants more efficiently from water.

###

References

DOI

10.48130/bchax-0026-0007

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.48130/bchax-0026-0007

Funding information

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42577019) and the Basic Operational Fund of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2025QN051).

About Biochar X

Biochar X is an open access, online-only journal aims to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries by providing a multidisciplinary platform for the exchange of cutting-edge research in both fundamental and applied aspects of biochar. The journal is dedicated to supporting the global biochar research community by offering an innovative, efficient, and professional outlet for sharing new findings and perspectives. Its core focus lies in the discovery of novel insights and the development of emerging applications in the rapidly growing field of biochar science.

WORD OF THE DAY (WOTD)

Recent advancements in the tribovoltaic effect for human motion energy harvesting and wearable self-powered sensing





KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
Outlook on the use of the tribovoltaic effect for wearable electronics. 

image: 

Outlook on the use of the tribovoltaic effect for wearable electronics.

view more 

Credit: Chi Zhang






Human motion such as walking, breathing, and joint movement contains abundant low-frequency mechanical energy. However, efficiently and stably converting this energy into electricity remains a challenge in the field of wearable electronics. Conventional technologies based on triboelectric or piezoelectric effects often suffer from unstable output, low power density, and complex power management systems.

A research team led by Prof. Chi Zhang at the Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences published recently published review in Wearable Electronics, summarizing a novel energy conversion strategy based on the tribovoltaic effect. This mechanism enables the direct generation of stable direct current (DC) output through dynamic semiconductor interfaces, offering a new pathway for human motion energy harvesting and self-powered sensing.

Human motion provides diverse energy sources, yet traditional technologies struggle to utilize them in a stable and efficient manner. The tribovoltaic effect, with its ability to directly produce stable DC output, not only improves energy conversion efficiency but also simplifies system design, making it suitable for wearable applications. The authors highlighted a variety of advanced device designs, including textile-based, multilayer, and three-dimensional generators. These strategies enhance device output performance while simultaneously improving flexibility, durability, and adaptability to complex human motions. Notably, such devices not only power small electronic systems but also generate characteristic electrical signals under motion, enabling real-time monitoring of human movement and physiological states.

A major advantage of tribovoltaic systems lies in their integration of energy harvesting and sensing. By combining power generation and sensing functions within a single device, continuous energy supply and real-time monitoring can be achieved without the need for external power sources, paving the way for truly self-powered wearable systems.

The research team emphasizes that future efforts will focus on high-performance material design, multi-mechanism coupling, and intelligent system integration, ultimately accelerating the practical application of tribovoltaic technology in wearable electronics and smart sensing.

###

Contact the author: Chi Zhang, Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101400, PR China, czhang@binn.cas.cn

The publisher KeAi was established by Elsevier and China Science Publishing & Media Ltd to unfold quality research globally. In 2013, our focus shifted to open access publishing. We now proudly publish more than 200 world-class, open access, English language journals, spanning all scientific disciplines. Many of these are titles we publish in partnership with prestigious societies and academic institutions, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

 

Dog training choices reflect owners’ ethical views on animals







University of Copenhagen



Whether a dog owner rewards their dog with a treat or corrects it by pulling on the leash is not simply a matter of what they believe to be the most effective training method. According to the study, owners’ choice of training methods is linked to their ethical stance on how animals should be treated and used. The results come from a new study conducted by researchers from the University of Copenhagen in collaboration with colleagues from the University of Edinburgh.

Dog owners with an animal welfare-oriented ethical stance are less likely to use punishment-based training methods than those who believe that animals are there for humans to use.

“If you use punishment as part of dog training, you are more likely to view dogs as existing primarily for human purposes. If you use less punishment and rely more on positive training methods, you are more likely to orient yourself towards the idea that animals should have rights, or at least good welfare,” says Peter Sandøe, Professor at the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at the University of Copenhagen and senior author of the study.

Treats versus verbal correction

The study is based on responses from 500 dog owners in the United States, who were surveyed about their training practices.

Positive training methods – such as treats, toys and verbal praise – were widely used among respondents, while punishment-based methods, including verbal reprimands or physical correction, were used less frequently.

The participants were also asked about their views on animals and were categorized based on their responses. Overall, respondents reflected three main types of ethical orientation towards animals: an anthropocentric orientation, an animal welfare-oriented ethics stance and an animal rights orientation.

The results show that dog owners with an anthropocentric animal‑ethical stance are more likely to use punishment‑based methods than owners who believe that animals are entitled to good welfare or rights. In addition, owners who believe that animals are entitled to good welfare were more likely to use positive methods than owners with an anthropocentric stance.

Training choices are not based on effectiveness alone

According to Peter Sandøe, the study indicates that choice of dog training methods does not solely reflect technical knowledge or understanding of learning theory.

“Training is not a neutral activity. It is an activity in which the owner’s view of the animal becomes apparent. The methods people choose also reflect their beliefs about what our moral obligations towards animals are.”

From this perspective, influencing choice of training methods is not merely a technical or professional issue.

“It is not only about learning theory – it is also an ethical discussion. You cannot isolate it as something purely technical or sciency, as some tend to do,” says Peter Sandøe.

More reflective choices for dog owners

Although the study was conducted in the United States, similar patterns may be expected in other countries, explains Peter Sandøe. While the distribution of ethical views may vary across countries, the relationship between ethical orientation and the choice of training methods is likely to be comparable.

At the same time, the findings may encourage reflection among dog owners.

“The study creates room for reflection. Ethics appears to play an important role in why people do what they do when training their dogs,” says Peter Sandøe.

Overall, the study highlights considerable variation in how people relate to animals.

“People have very different views on animals, and dog training is an area that really divides opinions,” concludes Peter Sandøe.

 

[[ BOX 1: About the study

The study is based on responses from 500 dog owners in the United States who completed a questionnaire. Participants reported how often they used different training methods and were then asked to respond to a series of statements about animal ethics.

The study is not representative, and the results cannot therefore be used to estimate how widespread different training methods or ethical orientations are in the general population. The study focuses solely on the relationship between training choices and ethical orientation.

The study used a measure of animal ethical orientation developed by researchers at the University of Copenhagen. This measure has also been applied in previous studies examining the relationship between animal ethics views and consumer choices, such as the purchase of pork with or without animal welfare labels.

The data collection was carried out by Tracy Weber from the University of Edinburgh.

The study also involved contributions from Kevin McPeake from the University of Edinburgh, Thomas Bøker Lund from the Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Copenhagen, and Björn Forkman and Iben Meyer from the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences at the University of Copenhagen.

Link to the study: Full article: Dog Owners’ Use of Training Methods and Their Ethical Stance on the Treatment of Animals ]]

 

[[ BOX 2: Three types of ethical orientation towards animals

The study categorized respondents according to their ethical orientation towards animals. Overall, three main orientations were identified:

  1. Anthropocentric orientation – the view that it is ethically acceptable for humans to use animals for human purposes
  2. Animal protection orientation – the view that humans may use animals, but have an obligation to ensure good animal welfare
  3. Animal rights orientation – the view that animals have moral value comparable to humans and should be entitled to similar rights

Dog owners with an anthropocentric orientation were more likely to use verbal reprimands or physical correction as part of their dog training than owners with one of the two other animal-ethical orientations. At the same time, owners with a welfare‑oriented view used more positive methods – such as treats, toys, and praise – than the anthropocentric owners. ]]

 

[[ BOX 3: Positive and punishment-based training methods

Most respondents reported using positive training methods, consistent with what the study refers to as positive reinforcement training.

  • 97 percent reported using praise
  • 86 percent reported using treats or toys as rewards

Punishment-based methods were used less frequently:

  • 46 percent reported using some form of punishment
  • 25 percent reported using physically aversive methods, such as pulling on the leash or similar forms of physical correction

Only a small proportion of respondents – just under 18 percent – reported relying exclusively on reward-based training methods. ]]

TRUMPLAND

National Institutes of Health Grant terminations disproportionately impact minority scientists



A survey of nearly 1,000 researchers whose grants were cut shows BIPOC, LGBTQ+ and women investigators faced higher odds of grant terminations, raising concerns about long-term impacts on the U.S. scientific workforce



University of California - San Diego





Key takeaways: 

  • A national survey of 941 scientists whose National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants were terminated in 2025 found the cuts disproportionately affected minority researchers.

  • Researchers from marginalized groups were both overrepresented among those whose grants were canceled and more likely to have their work specifically targeted for termination.

  • The findings suggest the policy changes may deepen existing disparities in the U.S. biomedical research workforce.

Researchers from University of California San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science have found that recent federal grant terminations targeting research on health equity and gender identity have disproportionately affected scientists from the very communities those studies aim to support. The findings were published May 5, 2026 in The Lancet Regional Health – Americas.

“These grant terminations didn’t just disrupt specific research projects, they also disrupted the careers of many scientists who study the health of marginalized communities,” said Rebecca Fielding-Miller, PhD, associate professor at the UC San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science and senior author of the study. “When funding for these topics disappears, the researchers with the deepest expertise in them are often the ones most directly affected.”

The NIH is the world’s largest public funder of biomedical research, investing roughly $47 billion annually. Because of the scale of this investment, American research priorities help shape the direction of health science innovations globally.

Between January and May 2025, the NIH terminated more than 2,000 research grants after shifting agency priorities. Many of the affected grants focused on health disparities, including research related to BIPOC communities and sexual and gender minorities. In addition, about 600 grants were canceled through institution-wide actions aimed at addressing alleged campus antisemitism.

To understand who was most affected, the research team surveyed investigators whose terminated grants were documented in the Grant Witness database. Of 1,918 investigators invited to participate, 941 completed the survey. In order to categorize terminations by justification, investigators were asked to select from eight possible reasons for the termination. For example, participants were considered to have received an equity-related termination if they indicated their grant was terminated due to “amorphous equity objectives,” and a gender-related termination if they indicated their grant was terminated due to “gender identity.”

The analysis found that nearly half (48.6%) of investigators whose grants were terminated for equity-related reasons identified as BIPOC. Among grants terminated for gender-related reasons, 60% of investigators identified as sexual or gender minorities, including 16.5% who were transgender or nonbinary. Disparities extended beyond simple representation. Among investigators whose grants were terminated, BIPOC women and transgender or nonbinary researchers had nearly three times higher odds of receiving an equity-related termination than White men. Sexual and gender minority investigators were more than 11 times more likely to receive a gender-related termination than heterosexual, cisgender researchers.

The study also found that 20.5% of investigators affected by institution-wide terminations tied to alleged antisemitism identified as Jewish, raising questions about the effectiveness of those actions as a mechanism to protect Jewish researchers.

The findings build on earlier research showing that disparities already exist in the biomedical funding system. Previous studies have found that scientists from underrepresented backgrounds are more likely to study health disparities or community-based topics that historically receive less funding.

“When funding disruptions disproportionately affect researchers who focus on health disparities, the consequences go far beyond individual careers,” Fielding-Miller said. “They also shape which scientific questions get asked, and whose health ultimately receives attention.”

The authors warn that the effects could persist for years. Because research careers and funding success tend to build cumulatively over time, losing even a single grant can derail projects, disrupt community partnerships and limit future funding opportunities, particularly for early-career investigators.

Looking ahead, the researchers say restoring and sustaining funding for equity-related health research will be critical to maintaining a diverse scientific workforce and ensuring that biomedical research reflects the needs of all communities.

“If we want a scientific enterprise that serves everyone,” Fielding-Miller said, “we have to ensure that scientists studying the health of marginalized communities are able to continue their work.”

Link to full study: Targeted termination of scientific grants and minoritised researcher status in a national survey

Additional co-authors on the study include: Natalie Vawter, MPH, and Laramie R. Smith, PhD, from UC San Diego. Nicholas Metheny, PhD, from Emory University. Abigail M. Hatcher, from University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Sarah Peitzmeier, PhD, from University of Maryland, College Park.

The authors received no external funding for this study.