Saturday, April 18, 2026

 

Rights groups in Sweden slam government 'honest living' proposal for migrants

Migrant pupils walk under a railway bridge in Flen, 30 August, 2018
Copyright AP Photo

By Gavin Blackburn
Published on 

The Swedish Refugee Law Centre, an organisation that provides legal assistance to asylum seekers, says the proposals will make the process for residence permits unpredictable.

Sweden's government has faced growing criticism over its plans to require migrants to adhere to "honest living," with rights groups and legal experts saying the proposed measure is discriminatory.

Sweden's government, which came to power in 2022 on pledges to get tough on immigration and crime, is trying to rapidly push through a slew of reforms ahead of legislative elections in September.

If approved by parliament, the "honest living" measure would come into force on 13 July.

Under the proposed change, the Migration Agency will consider, when granting or renewing non-EU citizens' residence permits, whether applicants have at any time posed a threat to public order or security, had extremist sympathies or links to groups advocating violence, or committed minor offences punishable by fines.

Other factors may include going into debt "without any intention or effort to repay," organised begging, committing welfare fraud or working off the books.

Those found not adhering to the "honest living" standard could face deportation.

Police escort three men from a train at Hyllie station, 17 December, 2015 AP Photo

"The consequences will be very serious" for migrants affected by the reform, John Stauffer, a legal adviser for the human rights organisation Civil Rights Defenders, told the AFP news agency.

Even a person's statements, although they in themselves should not be considered as proof of a lack of "honest living," may indicate links to "violent extremism," Ludvig Aspling, a spokesman for the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats which props up the minority right-wing government, said when the plans were announced.

"This creates a system where people, depending on their legal status and whether they are citizens or have residence permits, have different rights in our society, especially when it comes to freedom of expression," Stauffer said.

"If you are a citizen, you have broad and strongly-protected freedom of expression. If you are not a citizen, then you will have freedom of expression, but it will not be as strong," he explained.

Unpredictable processing

The proposal would make it easier to revoke immigrants' residence permits.

"It is not a human right to stay in Sweden. It is important to remember that," Migration Minister Johan Forssell told AFP.

"If you come to Sweden and you're not a citizen, it's almost like being a guest in someone's home. Then you should show that you want to become part of the country. That you make an effort, that you pull your weight, that you work," Forssell said.

The government has not yet published a definitive list of actions or behaviours that would constitute a violation of the "honest living" requirement.

The Swedish Refugee Law Centre, an organisation that provides legal assistance to asylum seekers, says the new considerations will make the process for residence permits unpredictable.


A policeman watches over a queue of newly arrived people at Hyllie station, 19 November, 2015 AP Photo

"This can also create a sense of insecurity when you don't really know how your actions in different situations might be assessed," Elias Nygren, a lawyer working for the organisation, told AFP.

Some organisations worry that certain types of activism may also be considered a breach of "honest living."

"We organise trainings in civil disobedience, that is, in non-violence and the principles that guide our actions. We are finding that this question comes up more and more often," Frida Bengtsson, head of Greenpeace Sweden, told AFP.

"Many people are dropping out because they hesitate to take action due to the current uncertainty. They don't really dare take that risk," she added.

In a satirical op-ed published in newspaper Dagens Nyheter, Swedish writer Gellert Tamas suggested some members of government take a closer look at their own past.

Some of them, he argued, would be candidates for deportation, starting with the migration minister himself.

A family from Syria sleeps outside the Swedish Migration Board in Märsta, 8 January, 2016 AP Photo

"Johan Forssell has 'clear links to an organisation promoting violence'," he wrote, citing the wording in the draft of the bill, "because of his son's former membership in the openly Nazi group Aktivklubb Sverige."

In July 2025, it emerged in the media that Forssell's then 16-year-old son was a member of Aktivklubb Sverige, which the minister said he had not been aware of.

"Forssell's defence, that 'this was about a deeply remorseful 15-year-old, who just turned 16,' would hardly have impressed in an assessment into honest living," Tamas said.

Taking control of migration

Sweden's Prime Minister told Euronews last year that there was an "absolute need to get control on migration."

He reiterated his proposal to significantly increase the amount of money Sweden offers to migrants as a financial incentive to leave the country.

Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson arrives for the EU summit at the European Council building in Brussels, 19 March, 2026 AP Photo

The current grant is €900 per adult. However, this initiative has had limited success so far. In 2023, only one out of 70 applications was approved, according to the Swedish Migration Agency.

To reverse this trend, a new government proposal would raise the amount to €32,000, an increase of 3,400%.

Sweden began revamping its asylum policy in 2015, moving to a much stricter stance on application processing after the country hosted record numbers of asylum seekers, more than 160,000 people, from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.














Hardt, Michael. Multitude: war and democracy in the Age of Empire /. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. p. cm. Sequel to: Empire. Includes index. ISBN 1-59420 ...

Empire / Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. p. cm. Includes bibliographical ... 4.3 The Multitude against Empire. 393. Notes. 415. Index. 473. Page 11. PREFACE.



FASCIST INTERNATIONALE

Europe's Patriots rally in Milan against immigration while Salvini backs Russian oil

Patriots for Europe rally in Milan
Copyright AP Photo

By Fortunato Pinto
Published on 

Far-right leaders met in Milan calling for a plan to introduce remigration in Europe. League chief Salvini proposes a points-based residence permit and attacks the EU over its energy-crisis response, backing a reopening to Russian oil.

Thousands of people took part in Milan on Saturday in the “Masters in Our Own Home” demonstration, organised by the League and the Patriots for Europe group. Before reaching Piazza Duomo, around two thousand people marched through the city centre, led by a tractor in support of “Made in Italy” and by League mayors wearing the tricolour sash.

On stage, League leader and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini opened his speech by recalling Giacomo Bongiorni, who was beaten to death by two young men in Massa: “As a community, we must apologise to you, because you cannot die simply for reminding someone of good manners,” the deputy prime minister said, also paying tribute to the League’s founder Umberto Bossi, who died on 19 March.

Salvini then paid tribute to Viktor Orbán, who was defeated in the recent elections in Hungary. “You have defended the borders and fought against traffickers in people and weapons; let us continue together this battle for freedom and the rule of law,” Salvini said.

Remigration and a points-based residence permit

On migration policy, Salvini set out a vision based on the concept of "remigration" and a new merit-based system of citizenship. The League leader said that **"**remigration does not mean sending away everyone you meet in the street, but that the residence permit and citizenship are an act of trust. We guarantee you benefits and free healthcare, but if you make mistakes, as with the points-based driving licence, there will also be a points-based residence permit: after a number of mistakes you go back to your own country”.

The League leader and deputy prime minister also reiterated his intention to prioritise migration flows that are culturally close: “We want to prioritise immigration from countries that are close to us in culture and values, to ensure genuine integration and not the chaos that serves the globalist left to pay workers less in factories”.

Salvini against the idea of an energy lockdown

He then turned to a scathing criticism of the European Union's economic management. Salvini rejected the prospect of new energy lockdowns and called for "the suspension of the Stability Pact rules and the possibility of using Italians' money to help Italians in difficulty", also urging an end to sanctions on Russian gas.

Describing "the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund, run by Martians, as a malevolent duo", the deputy prime minister pointed to the United States as an example for the resumption of energy trade with Moscow, concluding, "If they do it in Washington, they must do it in Brussels as well".

He also referred to the defeat of the justice referendum, **"**A family that wins or loses picks itself up and grows together. After the victory of the No side in the referendum, we are even more united, strong and determined to work together, without fear of speeding up the reforms that Italians need," Salvini said, stressing that the governing majority remains solid.

The Patriots rally around Salvini

Many European leaders belonging to Patriots for Europe took to the stage, reinforcing the message of defending national borders. Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš stressed that “the Patriots represent a Europe in which borders are protected”.

Harsh words also came from Party for Freedom founder Geert Wilders, who condemned the assault and sexual violence against two young Dutch people in Milan on Friday evening by two migrants, declaring, "We must stop immigration from Islamic countries, enough, not even one; they are criminals who want to follow sharia law."

The international delegation was completed by France's Jordan Bardella, Spain's Santiago Abascal and Austria's Udo Landbauer. Looking ahead to the French presidential elections, Bardella said that "a victory for the National Rally in France will not only be a French victory, but a victory for all the nations of Europe".

Vox leader Abascal criticised Spain's Sánchez government for the mass regularisation of migrants, adding, **"**This is why it is important that we Patriots remain united, protecting our borders as Matteo Salvini and the Italian government have done".

Landbauer, of Austria's Freedom Party (FPÖ), voiced concern for the continent's cultural identity, describing the current situation as a threat to "the Europe that we all love, which is now in danger".

Thousands against the Patriots' rally: clashes with police reported

Demonstrators display a banner reading 'Milan is Migrant, Partisans Against Racism, Fascism, ' to protest the anti-migrant rally 'Without Fear in Europe, Milan, 18.04.2026 AP Photo

In parallel with the Patriots' gathering, Milan was the scene of high tensions during protest marches by antagonists and social centres. Around five thousand demonstrators marched chanting "fascists out of Milan", trying to break through the police cordon in Via Borgogna to reach Piazza Duomo.

Officers responded by using water cannon to contain the throwing of firecrackers, smoke bombs and bottles. After the clashes, the march by Antifa collectives moved towards Piazza Medaglie d'Oro, while protesters denounced the presence of the Patriots in the heart of the city.






































Hardt, Michael. Multitude: war and democracy in the Age of Empire /. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. p. cm. Sequel to: Empire. Includes index. ISBN 1-59420 ...

Empire / Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. p. cm. Includes bibliographical ... 4.3 The Multitude against Empire. 393. Notes. 415. Index. 473. Page 11. PREFACE.







Exclusive: EU-based chemical producers ask Commission to probe Chinese group over deal in the UK

A chemical recycling site. The Associated Press.
Copyright Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

By Peggy Corlin
Published on 

European chemical producers want the Commission to launch a probe into Chinese LB Group as it seeks to purchase a competitor’s plant in the UK to export to the EU, according to sources. The group fears it could be used to get around anti-dumping duties.

A coalition of EU-based chemical producers of titanium dioxide – a strategic chemical used in green energy and aerospace – has lodged a complaint with the Commission alleging unfair foreign subsidies against leading Chinese producer LB Group, which is seeking to acquire a UK plant of British competitor Venator, Euronews has learned.

The move follows the European Commission’s decision in January 2025 to impose anti-dumping duties on LB Group, a trade defence measure targeting low-priced imports into the EU.

Acquiring a production plant in the UK would allow the Chinese group to export its products to the European market duty-free under the EU-UK trade agreement, circumventing EU anti-dumping tariffs.

The EU chemical sector is under pressure from growing competition from Chinese rivals, which are flooding the market with overcapacity.

The alliance behind the complaint against LB Group includes several companies producing in the EU — US-based Tronox and Kronos, Czech Precheza and Slovenian Cinkarna — collectively accounting for about 90% of EU titanium dioxide production.

Enforcing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation outside the EU

Sources said the complaint was filed in December 2025, urging the European Commission to investigate the Chinese company over alleged unfair foreign subsidies used to finance the acquisition of Venator’s plant.

The EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation, adopted in 2022, allows the Commission to investigate non-EU companies to assess whether they benefit from distortive foreign subsidies to make acquisitions in the EU or take part in public procurement.

The tool was initially designed with China in mind, reflecting concerns over excessive state subsidies support for Chinese companies acquiring strategic EU assets or infrastructure. However, the regulation has not yet been applied outside the EU.

The plant targeted by LB Group is located in Greatham in northeast England, which left the EU in 2020 after Brexit. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is currently reviewing the deal and is expected to issue a decision in May.

If the European Commission opens an investigation under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, it could set a precedent and send a strong signal globally.

The move would come as the EU chemical industry loses market share in Europe.

According to Cefic, which represents the sector in Brussels, the bloc has lost around 9% of its production capacity since 2022, resulting in the loss of 20,000 direct jobs.

 THE EPSTEIN CLASS

Starmer faces calls to step down after appointing Epstein associate

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer leaves after the multinational virtual summit and press conference at the Elysee Presidential Palace in Paris, Friday April 17, 2026
Copyright 2026 Getty Images

By Rory Elliott Armstrong with AFP
Published on 

Opposition leaders demanded Starmer's resignation on Thursday after it emerged that US envoy Peter Mandelson was appointed despite having failed his security check.

UK opposition leaders have called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to resign after the government confirmed that an associate of Jeffrey Epstein failed a background security check before becoming envoy to Washington.

Starmer has faced repeated questions about his judgment in appointing Peter Mandelson, who was sacked last year only months into the post over his ties to the late convicted US sex offender Epstein.

The opposition renewed calls for Starmer's resignation after an investigation by The Guardian newspaper discovered Mandelson had failed an initial background check -- later confirmed by the government.

Opposition right-wing Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch wrote on X that "Starmer has betrayed our national security. He should go".

Leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey, wrote on X: "If Keir Starmer has misled Parliament and lied to the British people, he has to go."

The prime minister has accused Mandelson of lying about the extent of his ties to Epstein during the vetting process for his Washington posting.

A government spokesperson said that foreign ministry officials made the decision to allow Mandelson's appointment to proceed "against the recommendation of UK Security Vetting".

But the spokesperson said neither Starmer nor the foreign minister "was aware" of this "until earlier this week".

The recommendation of UK Security Vetting was not binding, the spokesperson added.

Starmer said in February that Mandelson had been cleared by security vetting.

In March, Starmer's Labour government released about 150 pages of details of how Mandelson, a friend of Epstein, was vetted before being appointed ambassador in 2024.

Starmer sacked Mandelson as ambassador after documents released by a US Congressional committee revealed new details about the depth of his ties to Epstein.

Police have opened an investigation into allegations of misconduct in office by Mandelson, who was arrested and bailed in February.

The force is investigating Mandelson over allegations he leaked sensitive documents to Epstein when he was a government minister, including during the 2008 financial crash.

 

Trump brands UK ‘crazy’ for not drilling the North Sea. But would it actually lower energy bills?

Trump speaks at a roundtable event about no tax on tips, Thursday, April 16, 2026, in Las Vegas.
Copyright Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

By Liam Gilliver
Published on 

Donald Trump’s latest attack on renewables has reignited calls to drill the North Sea for oil – despite research showing it won’t lower energy bills.

Donald Trump has unleashed his latest attack on renewables, branding the UK “crazy” for not boosting oil extraction in the North Sea.

The British government ended exploration licences last year, meaning companies can no longer get permission to search for new oil and gas reserves in untapped areas. This doesn’t mean that all current drilling projects have stopped.

However, as Iran’s stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz – one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel chokepoints that carries around one fifth of global oil supplies – continues, calls to U-turn on the historic ban have gotten louder.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says the government is working “intensely” to allow further drilling by opening up “tie-back sites”, which permit drilling on or near existing fields. It comes after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecast that the war on Iran will hit the UK hardest of all the world’s advanced economies due to how much energy it imports.

Trump tells UK to ‘drill baby drill’


“Europe is desperate for energy, and yet the United Kingdom refuses to open North Sea Oil, one of the greatest fields in the world,” Trump wrote earlier this week on his social media platform Truth Social.

“Aberdeen should be booming. Norway sells its North Sea Oil to the UK at double the price. They are making a fortune.”

Trump went on to argue that the UK is “better situated” for North Sea drilling, adding: “Drill, baby drill! It’s absolutely crazy that they [the UK] don’t, and no more windmills!”

What Donald Trump gets wrong about the North Sea

The UK has already extracted around 4.1 billion tonnes of oil since 1975, with the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) projecting a further 218 million tonnes will be collected by 2050 from existing fields.

According to the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), these projections suggest that new drilling could only yield a further 74 million tonnes, equivalent to 1.7 per cent of the total that could be extracted from 1975 to 2050. This means that 93 per cent of the oil and gas that is likely to be produced from the North Sea has already been extracted.

A separate analysis from campaign group Uplift found that opening major new fields in the North Sea would make almost no difference to the UK’s reliance on gas imports.

The Jackdaw field, which is one of the biggest unexploited gasfields in the North Sea, would displace just two per cent of the UK’s current import of gas, while the Rosebank field, which mainly contains oil, would displace only around one per cent of the UK’s gas imports.

Uplift says this would still leave the UK almost entirely dependent on supplies from Norway and other nations.

Oil and gas prices are also set by global markets, not discounted for British consumers – and gas extracted from UK waters can be exported to the highest bidder – meaning increasing domestic production won’t necessarily lead to lower costs.

Will drilling the North Sea lower energy bills?

Amid pressure to drill the North Sea, the war on Iran has also ignited a race towards homegrown renewables – which are less impacted by geopolitical tensions.

The UK has been scrambling to improve its energy grid to cope with new solar and wind farms, which are often located in remote areas.

Renewables generated a record 52.5 per cent of the UK’s electricity in 2025 – the second consecutive year in which they have exceeded 50 per cent. Last month (26 March) British wind energy generation also hit a new high of 23,880 megawatts, enough power to supply around 23 million homes.

An analysis from the University of Oxford found that a UK fully powered by renewable energy could save households up to £441 (€510) a year on their energy bills.

In comparison, maximising oil and gas extraction from the North Sea would only save households £16 (€19) to £82 (€95) per year – and this would rely on tax revenues collected being distributed to households to offset their energy bills.

Dr Anupam Sen, co-author of the analysis, said the idea that “draining” the North Sea would make the UK more energy secure and significantly cut household bills is “sheer fantasy”.

Earlier this year, 10 European countries – including the UK – pledged €9.5 billion for a landmark commitment to deliver 100GW of joint offshore wind projects across shared North Sea waters by 2050. This is enough electricity to power around 134 million homes.