Wednesday, August 10, 2022

'The Sacrifice Zone': Myanmar bears cost of green energy


DAKE KANG, VICTORIA MILKO and LORI HINNANT
Mon, August 8, 2022


The birds no longer sing. The fish no longer swim in rivers that have turned a murky brown. The animals do not roam, and the cows are sometimes found dead.

The people in this northern Myanmar forest have lost a way of life that goes back generations. But if they complain, they, too, face the threat of death.

This forest is the source of several key metallic elements known as rare earths, often called the vitamins of the modern world. Rare earths now reach into the lives of almost everyone on the planet, turning up in everything from hard drives and cellphones to elevators and trains. They are especially vital to the fast-growing field of green energy, feeding wind turbines and Tesla engines. And they end up in the supply chains of some of the most prominent companies in the world, including General Motors, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Tesla and Apple.

But an AP investigation has found that their universal use hides a dirty open secret in the industry: Their cost is environmental destruction, the theft of land from villagers and the funneling of money to brutal militias, including at least one linked to Myanmar’s secretive military government. And as demand soars for rare earths along with green energy, the abuses are likely to grow.


“This rapid push to build out mining capacity is being justified in the name of climate change,” said Julie Michelle Klinger, author of the book “Rare Earths Frontiers,” who is leading a federal project to trace illicit energy minerals. “There’s still this push to find the right place to mine them, which is a place that is out of sight and out of mind.”

The AP investigation drew on dozens of interviews, customs data, corporate records and Chinese academic papers, along with satellite imagery and geological analysis gathered by the environmental non-profit Global Witness, to tie rare earths from Myanmar to the supply chains of 78 companies.

About a third of the companies responded. Of those, about two-thirds did not or would not comment on their sourcing, including Volkswagen, which said it was conducting due diligence for rare earths. Nearly all said they took environmental protection and human rights seriously.

Some companies said they audited their rare earth supply chains; others didn’t or required only supplier self-assessments. GM said it understood “the risks of heavy rare earths metals” and would source from an American supplier soon.

Tesla did not respond to repeated requests for comment, and Mercedes said they contacted suppliers to learn more in response to this story. Apple said “a majority” of their rare earths were recycled and they found “no evidence” of any from Myanmar, but experts say in general there is usually no way to make sure.

Just as dirty rare earths trickle down the supply chains of companies, they also slip through the cracks of regulation.

In 2010, Congress required companies to disclose the origin of so-called conflict minerals — tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten. But the law does not cover rare earths. Audits are left up to individual companies, and no single agency is held accountable.

The State Department, which leads work on securing the U.S. rare earths supply, did not respond to repeated requests for comment. But experts say the government weighs the regulation of rare earths against other green goals, such as the sales and use of electric vehicles. Rare earths are also omitted from the European Union’s 2021 regulation on conflict minerals.

The United States offshored its rare earths mining to China in the 1980s because of environmental and cost issues. China’s leader at the time, Deng Xiaoping, declared rare earths China’s answer to “oil in the Middle East.”

For decades the industry prospered. Then, stung by public criticism, officials in Beijing declared war on the country’s dirty industries — including rare earths mining.

As mines in China shuttered, ore prices rose. Thousands of miners streamed across the border to neighboring Myanmar, home to some of the world’s richest deposits of what are known as heavy rare earths.

“It reminds me of the European colonial attitudes towards Africa,” said an industry analyst, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid damaging ties with the Chinese government. “You just can’t be relying on third-world-type mining practices in a dictatorship like Myanmar. It’s not sustainable.”

Guo, a Chinese miner who did not want to use his full name to talk freely, recounted primitive working conditions in Myanmar, including clouds of mosquitoes and nights spent burning logs in ramshackle cabins. The miners dug hundreds of feet deep with shovels and their bare, callused hands.

“I’m only responsible for digging the mountain up and selling it,” Guo said. “The rest is none of my business. … We just see if we can make money. It's that simple."

There is a name for what Myanmar has become: A “sacrifice zone,” or a place that destroys itself for the good of the world.

The sacrifice is visible from the air, in toxic turquoise pools that dot the landscape covered by mountain jungles just a few years ago. Since rare earth clays in Myanmar are soft and near the surface, they can easily be scooped into these pools of chemicals. Satellite imagery commissioned by Global Witness showed more than 2,700 of these pools at almost 300 separate locations.

A villager who lives along a river some 15 miles from the center of the mining sites said his wife used to catch and sell fish. Now the few they can catch make them ill.

“There are no fish along the creek, not even small fishes,” said the villager, who asked to be anonymous for his safety. “Everything went extinct.”

Militias are rampant in these northern forest frontier areas, including at least one tied to the military-backed Border Guard Force. The Myanmar military or Tatmadaw is under international sanctions for human rights abuses after it seized power last year. That means the rare earths money it gets from the militia may be fueling a violent crackdown against civilians. The Myanmar military and militia leaders did not respond to requests for comment.

For Dong, a Chinese miner, the hundreds of dollars he hands to the armed men lining the roads in Myanmar are the price of doing business. He is under no illusions about the damage from acids so strong that they corrode the shovels of his bulldozers and excavators.

“This stuff is unbelievable,” he said. “It’s definitely polluting.”

In the meantime, villagers protest in one area in northern Myanmar where the black cardamom and walnuts still grow – for now.

“They are mining rare earth everywhere and we are no longer safe to drink water,” a villager said. “There is nothing to support the children. Nothing to eat.”

___

AP researcher Si Chen and AP Diplomatic Writer Matthew Lee contributed to this report.

_____













This early 2022 photo provided by Global Witness shows a border fence separating Pangwa in the Kachin state of Myanmar and China. Rare earths imports from Myanmar grew nearly a hundredfold in just the three years since 2015. By 2018, they made up nearly three-fourths of China’s heavy rare-earth-rich clay ore supply, according to the latest statistics available. (Global Witness via AP)More
An author who helped Donald Trump ghostwrite his book speculates Trump may have taken White House documents to one day sell as presidential memorabilia



Cheryl Teh
Tue, August 9, 2022 

A man who helped Trump write a book has a theory on why Trump may have taken White House documents.

Charles Leerhsen thought Trump may have taken documents to sell as "presidential memorabilia."

"If there's a grift to be grifted, he's gonna grift it," Charles Leerhsen told Newsweek.


An author who once helped Trump write some of his books has a theory on why the former president could have taken some documents from the White House.

Charles Leerhsen, who worked with the former president in the 90s on his book, "Surviving at the Top," weighed in on the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago on Monday.

The FBI search is thought to be over material that Trump may have brought to his Florida residence after leaving the White House. The National Archives asked the DOJ in February to investigate whether or not Trump broke the law by taking government records from the White House to Mar-a-Lago.

Leerhsen wrote on Facebook his theory about why Trump could have taken documents.

"As a former Trump ghostwriter (mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa) I feel obligated to point out that Trump may have taken documents that he intended to sell as presidential memorabilia," Leerhsen said.

Speaking to Newsweek, Leerhsen said that he had seen how Trump earned his money even before going into politics, adding that the former president is not above "groveling." Leerhsen acknowledged, per Newsweek's reporting, that he did not know what Trump may or may not have taken, but speculated that pieces of paper he signed or collectible items could be things the former president may have wanted to keep.

"If there's a grift to be grifted, he's gonna grift it," Leerhsen told Newsweek. "He has this very basic sense that he might be able to pawn it off on someone."

He added that he once had a "firsthand sense" of Trump's "avariciousness and his personality."

"Like everyone else, I watched things get worse and spiral out of control," Leerhsen told Newsweek.

Leerhsen and representatives for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider.

Europe's energy crisis has gotten so bad that French power stations are being allowed to break environmental rules as a fresh heatwave looks set to cause more chaos

Beatrice Nolan
Tue, August 9, 2022 

French power stations are reportedly being allowed to break environmental rules to stay open.
Guillaume Souvant/AFP/Getty Images

French power stations are reportedly being allowed to break environmental rules to stay open, per Bloomberg.

The waiver is in place until September and will potentially breach national environmental standards.

Europe's prolonged hot weather is putting a further strain on energy supplies.

The European energy crisis set into motion by the Russian invasion of Ukraine shows no signs of abating and looks to deepen further in coming weeks as record heatwaves hit the continent.

In France, the crisis is so bad that power stations are being permitted to break environmental rules to stay open as the country struggles to maintain national energy supplies, according to a report from Bloomberg.

The French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) granted a temporary waiver allowing five nuclear plants across the country to dispense more than the authorized amount of hot water into rivers, the news agency reported.

The waiver, reportedly in place until September, allows Electricite de France to keep the energy plants operating amid national pressure on supply.

Electricite de France did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

In France, rivers and waterways are used to cool power plants. Under the current environmental rules, nuclear plants must reduce or stop output when river temperatures reach a point at which use by the plants may harm the environment, per Bloomberg. That provision is being temporarily halted.

Europe's prolonged high temperatures are putting further pressure on the bloc's already strained energy supplies.

The River Rhine, one of the continent's most important rivers, is drying up amid the record-breaking summer heatwaves, Insider reported last month. The river is currently at its lowest level in at least 15 years, making moving goods — including coal and gas — in container ships down the river a challenge.

Northwest and central Europe are set for even more hot weather in the coming weeks. Temperatures in the UK, France, and Germany are expected to soar on Friday, with some estimates predicting highs of 96.8 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the week.

The demand for cooling systems such as fans and air conditioning in the heat puts even more pressure on Europe's energy supplies.

In a further issue for European energy supplies, Norway has also threatened to ration international electricity exports if domestic needs are not met, per The Guardian.

Water levels in southern Norway have been so low that the government has said it may need to prioritize its own citizens ahead of international customers, the news outlet said.
U.S. coal plants delay closures in hurdle for clean energy transition


Alliant Energy's coal plant in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, U.S. on the shore of Lake Michigan

Tue, August 9, 2022 
By Timothy Gardner

SHEBOYGAN, Wisc. (Reuters) - Travel brochures in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, tout the town’s beaches on Lake Michigan as the Malibu of the Midwest. But pages of glossy photos leave out a feature of the landscape: a coal-fired power plant on the shore that will remain open until mid 2025 instead of closing this year as planned.

Alliant Energy Corp's Edgewater coal-fired plant in Sheboygan is one of at least six across the country that this summer have announced delays or potential delays to their planned closures, citing concerns about energy shortages.

A key culprit: renewable energy deployment, which was meant to replace these coal plants, has taken a hit in recent months because of COVID-19-related supply chain hiccups. Utilities say import tariffs on solar panels imposed by U.S. Commerce Department make it hard to keep up with robust power demand.

In addition to the closure delay of its 400 megawatt (MW) Edgewater plant in Sheboygan, Alliant's 1.1 gigawatt Columbia Energy Center in Portage will close by June 2026, a delay of about 18 months.

WEC Energy Group Inc has delayed the closure of remaining units at its 1,135 MW Oak Creek power plant near Milwaukee for up to 18 months until May 2024 and late 2025.

Indiana's NiSource Inc blamed solar project delays of up to 18 months for its postponing the shutdown of the 877 MW Schahfer coal plant for two years until 2025.

In Nebraska, the board of the Omaha Public Power District will vote on Aug. 18 on whether to keep the 645 MW North Omaha plant open until 2026, a delay of up to three years, due to siting delays and backlogs in studies in switching to natural gas and solar.

And in New Mexico, PNM Resources Inc delayed the closure of a unit at the San Juan plant by three months until September, as drought threatened hydropower supplies and heat boosted power demand.

When burned, coal emits more of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide than any other fossil fuel. It also releases nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide, precursors to haze and smog that harm human lungs and hearts.

All of the companies said that despite the delays, and potential delays, they will meet their long-term voluntary goals on carbon emissions and that scrubbers and other pollution devices have removed most of the criteria pollutants of their emissions.

Holly Bender, a senior director of energy campaigns at the Sierra Club environmental group, said the delays do not portend a resurgence in coal use. Nearly 360 U.S. coal plants have shut or plan to shut in recent years, compared with about 170 plants that remain active, according to the organization.

Rather, Bender said, the delays serve a "warning sign of the failure to plan for the kind of clean energy growth that is needed."

President Joe Biden's goals of cutting U.S. carbon emissions 50% by 2030 from 2005 levels and decarbonizing the power sector by 2035 will likely depend on even more shutdowns of coal plants.

Biden's emissions plan will get a lift if the U.S. House, as expected, follows the Senate to pass the Inflation Reduction Act https://www.reuters.com/world/us/democrats-score-big-wins-climate-drugs-with-430-billion-us-senate-bill-2022-08-08/, which analysts say will cut emissions about 40% by 2030 by giving market certainty on hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy tax credits and incentives.

The U.S. coal industry has been slammed by a surge of cheap natural gas, declining prices for renewables, and regulations cracking down on pollution that causes direct health issues and threatened ones on carbon dioxide. Coal generated about 20% of U.S. electricity last year, down from about 50% in 2006.

But cutting emissions further will not be easy.

"It's imperative that we increase accountability on utilities, regulators, and planners to ensure ... the transformation of our power sector off coal," Bender said.

NOT HELPING THE PROBLEM

Estimating the health effects of coal plant emissions on people in exact areas is difficult as their high smokestacks disperse pollution into the wind. Pollution from vehicles and industry also harm air quality.

Still, like many densely-populated, industrial U.S. areas, parts of Sheboygan county have been out of compliance for revised U.S. ozone standards since 2018, while all of Milwaukee county has been out of compliance since then, according to the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

And coal plants, even if they are in areas that are in compliance with federal standards, can contribute to health problems, said Tracey Hollaway, an air quality scientist at University of Wisconsin, Madison.

"It's still affecting the air of people far downwind," she said about the delays. "Keeping these facilities open is not helping the problem."

It is an open question whether the delays are a harbinger of more to come. But coal market players see at least temporary opportunities.

Joe Craft, the chief executive of Alliance Resource Partners, the third largest U.S. coal producer, told analysts this month that plants staying open is "going to bode well for us."

Strength in U.S. and European coal markets should drive Alliance's year-over year margin growth from now through 2024, Craft said.

Ted O'Brien, managing partner and chief commercial officer at Oluma Resources, a Pittsburgh-based marketer of the fuel, said nobody believes coal plants will stay open in perpetuity, but the delays could at least extend the life of mines.

"Maybe this does give coal staying power to maintain its corner in the broader U.S. energy mix," O'Brien said.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; editing by Richard Valdmanis and Marguerita Choy)
Four insights into Manchin’s deal on the Mountain Valley Pipeline

The West Virginia senator gets the Biden administration and top congressional Democrats to back the pipeline. Here’s how.


by Dwayne Yancey
August 3, 2022


U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia. Official portrait.

Tuesday was the trade deadline in Major League Baseball and we saw the usual flurry of deals, including at least one that wasn’t just called the proverbial blockbuster but a “blockbuster for the ages” – that being slugger Juan Soto going from the Washington Nationals to the San Diego Padres.

The classic trades at the trade deadline go like this: A team that’s in contention feels it’s just one or maybe two players away from being able to make a World Series run. It looks to some out-of-contention team that has a star player, perhaps one near the end of his contract. The lower-placed team may figure the player won’t re-sign anyway, so if they don’t trade him now, they’ll get nothing in return when he leaves as a free agent at the end of the season. In return, the top team, desperate for talent now, even if only on a short-term basis, is happy to trade away some minor league prospects or sometimes the proverbial “player to be named later.” The top team gets help to win now; the lower team gets a youthful infusion of players who a few years from now may help it turn around. Someday that top team may regret losing those prospects but, for now, it feels no pain whatsoever, just the glory of immediate victory.

We can see examples of this several ways. One is in how the Minnesota Twins, one game ahead of the Cleveland Guardians in the American League Central, shipped four minor leaguers to the Baltimore Orioles for their closer. Another is how the Nationals sent Soto and Josh Bell to the Padres for six players – three current big leaguers and, most importantly, three of San Diego’s top minor league prospects. The final example is how top Democrats in Washington traded support for the Mountain Valley Pipeline in return for U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin’s support for a broader package dealing with climate, energy and health care issues that they are promoting as an anti-inflation measure. (We know it’s an anti-inflation measure because it’s called the Inflation Reduction Act.)

Last week, the West Virginia Democrat surprised Washington when he announced he would support what The New York Times has called “a landmark climate bill” – not something the fossil fuel-friendly Mountain State senator is usually associated with. Now, we know why: CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post have all reported that top Democrats – the Times specifically cited President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the deal-makers – agreed to Manchin’s demand that they support the Mountain Valley Pipeline.
Mountain Valley Pipeline. Courtesy of MVP.

In effect, the Mountain Valley Pipeline – which would run from 303 miles from northwestern West Virginia to Chatham, where it would connect with other pipelines – is that “player to be named later.” Biden, Schumer and Pelosi are like a contending team. They need to win now and will give up almost anything to get Manchin’s vote. For them, the Mountain Valley Pipeline is like some minor leaguer – important to somebody (in this case Manchin) but not a big name to them. If that’s what it took to secure the vote of one of the Senate’s most unreliable Democrats, trading support for some pipeline that’s not in their states and probably not top of their minds was probably an easy thing to do.

CNN reports that a one-page summary of the deal, which it obtained, says the Biden administration and top congressional Democrats will “require the relevant agencies to take all necessary actions to permit the construction and operation of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and give the D.C. Circuit jurisdiction over any further litigation.” That latter provision is important because right now, the pipeline has been stymied by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals; presumably the D.C. Circuit might look more favorably on the pipeline.

Some environmental groups, which have been fighting the pipeline since it was first proposed in 2014, see this as a grievous betrayal. They felt they might have even been on the verge of winning. The pipeline is mostly completed (there’s debate about how much of it is completed; some opponents question the 94% figure the developer cites) but has been stymied by lack of certain permits and a series of unfavorable court rulings. The pipeline operator recently said it would need four more years to finish the project. Opponents have openly hoped the project would simply run out of money. Now this.

There’s much irony here. Originally, there were two natural gas pipelines proposed to run from nearly the same place in northwestern West Virginia into Virginia. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline, led by Dominion Energy and Duke Energy, was announced first, with much fanfare. Then-Gov. Terry McAuliffe joined Dominion executives in making the announcement. (Disclosure: Dominion is one of our donors but donors have no say in news decisions; see our policy. You, too, can be a donor and have no say in news decisions.) By contrast, McAuliffe sent out a mere press release to endorse the MVP. Initially, much of the environmental opposition was concentrated on the ACP. When I was with The Roanoke Times, I pointed out that there seemed to be some geographical bias at work: Environmental groups were keen to line up against a pipeline that went near hoity-toity Charlottesville and Albemarle County but seemed a lot less interested in one that went through Southwest Virginia.

Despite that, if you had to bet back in 2014 on which pipeline would get closer to the finish line, you’d have easily bet on the one backed by two major utilities. Instead, Dominion and Duke eventually pulled the plug on the ACP and, in time, more environmental groups rallied to oppose the MVP – although that pipeline never achieved the national notoriety of, say, the Keystone XL Pipeline or the Dakota Access Pipeline.



















Now the Mountain Valley Pipeline is finally getting its name mentioned on the national stage, just not in a way that opponents had hoped. There are multiple lessons here, none of which will bring any comfort to opponents.The political math is not on the side of those who oppose the pipeline. Democrats could have nominated a presidential candidate in 2020 who was against fracking, the way that most natural gas comes to the surface, but they did not. (It’s also unclear whether such a candidate would have won the presidency.) All we know is that Democrats nominated Biden, who is clearly more open-minded about such things, and even he barely won. He also has terrible poll numbers right now and desperately needs some wins – and, at least from the Democratic point of view, this bill would be a big win. Democrats also don’t have a majority in the Senate. At best they have a 50-50 split. Democrats hate being so dependent on Manchin because he is so far out of the current Democratic mainstream, but this is the price they must pay for not being able to elect Democratic senators in 2020 in North Carolina and Maine. One Republican strategist told The Washington Post: “Manchin holds all the cards here, and this is his ante.” This is as clear an example of political muscle as you’ll see. Manchin had some leverage here and used it. If the alternative is no bill, no one should be surprised that Democratic leaders did what they could to get Manchin on board and agreed to his terms.

Political deals often involve uncomfortable compromises that outrage the purists on either side. On Monday, I wrote about the CHIPS-Plus Act that Congress recently passed, specifically the provision that calls for the federal government to establish at least 20 federal technology hubs around the country that will get showered with federal research dollars. I wrote about how groups in both Southwest and Southside have expressed interest in promoting their regions for one of these hubs and how Southwest, in particular, might have a pretty good chance of winning. I also pointed out the irony of how the U.S. representatives for those two regions – Bob Good for Southside, Morgan Griffith for Southwest – both voted against the bill, even though the communities they represent were making plans to try to benefit from it. Griffith said there were too many unpleasant things in the bill for his taste.

A few years ago Griffith colorfully described the legislative process this way: “An analogy I like to use for the legislative process invokes candy apples and toads. Legislation rarely includes only things I like – the candy apples – or omits the things I really dislike – the toads. Considering whether to support a bill usually means weighing whether there are enough candy apples to cover up the bad taste of a few toads.” I think the prospect of federal technology hub is a pretty tasty candy apple but Griffith feared too many toads in the mix. Tastes (and pain thresholds) vary.

Same thing here, just with a different bill and for those on a different part of the political spectrum: The Mountain Valley Pipeline is the toad that Democrats apparently have to eat if they want Machine’s support for the candy apple of that landmark climate bill. (Manchin, and Republicans, don’t see the pipeline as a toad at all, of course. They see it as necessary energy infrastructure, and they see natural gas as a lot cleaner than other fossil fuels, but I’m trying to explain this for Democrats who are aghast at this deal.) In any case, top Democrats here are more eager to cut a deal that involves some toads than Republicans have been. Purists and pragmatists will read very different things into that.

All politics is local, part one. We’ve all heard that. Here’s the obverse: It’s easier to make tough deals involving somebody else’s sacrifice. Would Schumer have been so keen for this deal if the Mountain Valley Pipeline ran through New York? Would Pelosi have gone along if it went through San Francisco? Probably not, right? It’s a lot easier for those at the national level to be more dispassionate about the deal than those who are closer to the actual pipeline. The Washington Post quoted some on the left who seemed OK with the Mountain Valley-Pipeline-for-Manchin’s vote deal. “We must pass the Inflation Reduction Act if we want to get on track to cutting carbon pollution in half by a decade,” said one California-based energy expert. “Without this legislation we don’t have a pathway to get there; with it, we have a fighting chance. There are provisions I don’t agree with, but we have to be clear-eyed: Failure is not an option right now. We have to get climate investments over the finish line.”

The Post also pointed out that “Democrats’ climate provisions would dwarf the impact of the West Virginia pipeline, in terms of their impact on emissions. The firm Energy Innovation found that greenhouse gas emissions would fall by as much as 41 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 with the bill.” The pipeline might generate carbon emissions at a scale of 26 power plants, but some see that as a necessary tradeoff if they’re going to achieve the larger goal. Others are simply horrified that there’s any concession. I notice that it’s those on the ground who are the loudest in opposition to this deal. “Residents of every Appalachian and environmental justice community deserve to benefit from ambitious and transformative climate policy, and we firmly oppose any approach by Congress that sacrifices frontline communities as part of a political bargain,” said Jessica Sims, Virginia field coordinator of Appalachian Voices. Just as nobody asked those minor league prospects if they wanted to get traded away, nobody in Washington asked Appalachian Voices if they were OK with this deal – and nobody will.

4. All politics is local, part two. Now for the more conventional interpretation of this maxim. Some see Manchin as a shill for the fossil fuel industry. There’s a whole internet out there where you can read whatever you like about Manchin, but, whatever his motivations, this pipeline is a much bigger jobs generator in West Virginia than it is in Virginia. In Virginia, it’s basically passing through. Roanoke Gas will buy some of the gas and says that will help lower gas prices in the Roanoke Valley. (Critics dispute this.) McAuliffe backed both pipelines initially because he said manufacturers needed natural gas so if Virginia wanted more manufacturers, then it needed more natural gas pipelines. Gov. Glenn Youngkin, in a recent letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, essentially made the same argument, plus a few more. You can certainly argue there’s some indirect job creation in Virginia out of the pipeline but in West Virginia there’s definite direct job creation out of pumping natural gas out of the ground and sending it on its merry way. It’s also been a job sector that’s been declining. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says that gas extraction jobs peaked in West Virginia in August 2014 at 2,822 and last year dipped to 1,890. No one should be surprised that Manchin is trying to cut a deal that would help boost employment in the state he represents. You can make the case that Manchin should be more supportive of renewable energy, and cutting deals to get more solar jobs and more wind jobs in his state instead, but that’s not how he rolls. Again, see point one. Manchin wouldn’t matter so much if the Senate math were different.

This deal isn’t law yet. It needs at least 60 votes in the 50-50 Senate, which means it needs at least 10 Republicans, who might like the provisions to speed up energy projects, but some Democrats might yet defect. (The main bill needed only 51 votes, which is why Manchin’s vote was critical, but this side deal requires 60). We’ll see. One thing is certain: We saw some classic dealing in Washington with the baseball team. We also just saw some with the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

Russia successfully launches Iranian satellite



In this handout photo taken from video released by Roscosmos on Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2022, a Russian Soyuz rocket lifts off to carry Iranian Khayyam satellite into orbit at the Russian leased Baikonur cosmodrome near Baikonur, Kazakhstan. A Russian rocket has successfully launched an Iranian satellite into orbit. The Soyuz rocket lifted off as scheduled at 8:52 a.m. Moscow time (0552 GMT) Tuesday from the Russia-leased Baikonur launch facility in Kazakhstan. (Roscosmos via AP)More

Tue, August 9, 2022 

MOSCOW (AP) — A Russian rocket on Tuesday successfully launched an Iranian satellite into orbit.

The Soyuz rocket lifted off as scheduled at 8:52 a.m. Moscow time (0552 GMT) Tuesday from the Russia-leased Baikonur launch facility in Kazakhstan.

About nine minutes after the launch, it placed the Iranian satellite called Khayyam into orbit. It's named after Omar Khayyam, a Persian scientist who lived in the 11th and 12th centuries.  

https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/download/RubaiyatofOmarKhayyam_10630613.pdf

(Biographical Rubaiyat). 3. 82. (Versions of H. G. K eene). 4 I4~ 4 3. S. (Bibliography). 4 38. —. 594. (Omar Khayyam Club).


Iran has said the satellite fitted with high-resolution camera will be used for environmental monitoring and will remain fully under its control.

Tehran said no other country will have access to information it gathers and it would be used for civilian purposes only, but there have been allegations that Russia may use it for surveillance of Ukraine amid its military action there.

If it operates successfully, the satellite would give Iran the ability to monitor its archenemy Israel and other countries in the Middle East.

Yuri Borisov, head of Russia's state space corporation Roscosmos, hailed the launch as an “important landmark" in cooperation between Moscow and Tehran.

Iranian state television aired footage of the launch live, noting that the country’s telecommunications minister attended the liftoff in Kazakhstan. Tehran said the satellite will help improve productivity in the agriculture sector, survey water resources, manage natural disasters, confront deforestation and monitor border areas.

Citing Iran’s civilian space agency, state television said the satellite would provide high-resolution surveillance images with a one-meter-per-pixel definition. Western civilian satellites offer around half-a-meter per pixel, while U.S. spy satellites are believed to have even-greater definition.

Iran has both a civilian and military space program, which the U.S. fears could be used to advance its ballistic missile program. However, Iran has seen a series of mishaps and failed satellite launches over recent years.
Sri Lankans rally against crackdown on protesters





Sri LankaTrade union and civil society activists led by leftists' People Liberation Front gather for a protest in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2022. Hundreds of Sri Lankans Tuesday rallied against a government crackdown and the use of emergency laws against those who protested peacefully against the country’s worst economic crisis in recent memory.
(AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena)More

ERANGA JAYAWARDENA
Tue, August 9, 2022 

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka (AP) — Hundreds of Sri Lankans on Tuesday rallied against a government crackdown and the use of emergency laws against peaceful protesters demanding answers to the country’s worst economic crisis.

Protesters led by religious and trade union leaders marched to the Independence Square in Colombo and made several demands to the government including the withdrawal of emergency laws, an end to the arrests of peaceful protesters, the immediate dissolution of Parliament and relief for those burdened by the hardship and shortages of basic supplies.

Four months of street protests culminated last month when former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa fled to Singapore and resigned after demonstrators stormed his official home and occupied several key government buildings. His brother Mahinda Rajapaksa resigned as prime minister in May and four other family members had quit as ministers before him.

Protesters accuse the Rajapaksa family of plunging the country into the crisis through mismanagement and corruption.

The former prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, was elected by Parliament to complete Rajapaksa’s five-year term until 2024, but many of the protesters are unhappy with him and say he was backed by lawmakers who are still loyal to the Rajapaksas to protect the former ruling family from being held accountable.

Several groups had initially called a major rally to force Wickremesinghe out of office but a lack of support forced them to hold smaller protests. They called for a temporary government, the dissolution of Parliament and fresh elections.

Since his election, Wickremesinghe has authorized the military and police to violently dismantle protest camps and arrest those they identified to have trespassed the presidential palace and other state buildings.

Wickremesinghe on Tuesday visited the army headquarters and thanked soldiers who protected Parliament when protesters tried to enter last month.

“If we had lost Parliament, it would have created a big problem ... we would have lost the governance system that we know,” Wickremesinghe said, adding that now it was up to lawmakers to win over the confidence of the people.

Sri Lanka Presents Plan in Parliament to Cut President’s Powers




Asantha Sirimanne
Wed, August 10, 2022 

(Bloomberg) -- Sri Lanka’s government introduced a parliamentary proposal to curb the powers of the president’s office, the first step to reform a political system widely seen as responsible for tipping the country into economic chaos and bankruptcy.

The passing of the proposed constitutional amendment would be a win for President Ranil Wickremesinghe and buy him time to institute tough economic reforms to secure a bailout from the International Monetary Fund as the country struggles to find funds for food and fuel supplies.

Wickremesinghe had promised to follow through with the changes in the presidency -- a key demand from protesters and lawmakers who say the sweeping powers of the executive led to missteps by the former leader Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration.

Under Rajapaksa, the constitution was amended to give him wide-ranging powers to appoint and dismiss ministers. The new proposals aim to give more oversight to parliament, restore independence to commissions in decision making and prohibits Sri Lankans with dual citizenship from holding office.

Justice Minister Wijedasa Rajapaksa introduced the bill, known as the 22nd amendment to the constitution, in parliament on Wednesday. The latest amendment approved by cabinet last week, will need the votes of two-thirds of the members of parliament to become law. It can be challenged in the country’s top court within a week of being placed in parliament.

Rajapaksa fled to Singapore last month following monthslong protests in Sri Lanka that saw demonstrators enter his home and offices. He stepped down as president soon after but is widely expected to return to the island nation.

In his inaugural speech to parliament last week, Wickremesinghe, who was elected president with the support of lawmakers from Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s party, called for support for his administration’s measures to help pull the nation out of its economic tailspin.

However, Wickremesinghe has also used the powers of the presidency to impose emergency rule and police have arrested several protesters for their involvement in demonstrations that forced out Rajapaksa.

Many in the protest movement have called for Wickremesinghe’s ouster as well, saying that he would not hold the former president accountable for economic mismanagement in a country where foreign exchange reserves remain low and inflation has stayed above 60%.

A day before the proposals were brought to parliament, a planned protest appeared to have lost steam as the government cracked down and cleared out several protest sites, including an iconic ocean-front area that was the heart of the anti-Rajapaksa anger. People are also focused on securing supplies of fuel and cooking gas that have started to trickle into the country. That was a marked change from the anger in the months before when people had to queue for hours to secure these essential items.

Bloomberg Businessweek

Rivers across Europe are too dry, too low and too warm

Extended heat and low rainfall across Europe are causing maj
or rivers to dry up. This is having serious consequences for wildlife, the economy and the people living near the Rhine, Po, Thames and other affected rivers.

Date 10.08.2022
Author Carla Bleiker

European rivers such as the Danube are dangerously low after months of drought


Europe's great rivers are important economic routes and ecosystems, as well as emblems of the cities through which they pass. Now, countries all across the continent are struggling once more with high temperatures and prolonged drought — and, as a result, the rivers are running low or are simply too hot.

The water level in the Rhine is extremely low. The average depth of the river at this time of year is usually about 2 meters (6.5 feet), but in some places it has fallen to less than 1 meter. In one narrow section of the river, near the German city of Koblenz, the water level at the start of August was only 56 centimeters (22 inches).

The Rhine is one of the busiest waterways in the world, but low levels mean severe restrictions for cargo ships. In order for them to pass through the narrow section near Koblenz fully laden, for example, the water has to be at least 1.5 meters deep. The shallow flow means they can only be loaded to a fraction of their capacity — and this pushes up the price of the goods they transport. If water levels don't rise soon, some ships won't be able to pass at all.


Ships have significantly reduced their loads near Cologne so as not to run aground


WWII bomb resurfaces


When drought hits, remarkable things resurface from rivers and lakes: bones, fossils, even entire civilizations that sank beneath floodwaters thousands of years ago.

In late July, the receding water of the Po, Italy's longest river, exposed something far more dangerous when fishers near the city of Mantua found a 450-kilogram (1,000 pound) World War II bomb. It was only revealed because the northern Italian regions, including the Po Valley, are currently experiencing their worst drought in 70 years.


The receding waters of the Po River in Italy exposed a World War II bomb, which had to be destroyed


According to the Italian army, the unexploded bomb was defused, transferred to a safe site and detonated in a controlled explosion in early August. No one was hurt, but about 3,000 people had to leave their homes along the banks of the river during the operation.

Shifting Thames

The Thames is as much a part of London as Buckingham Palace or the Houses of Parliament, but it originates near the village of Kemble in southwest England. Or it did — until recently.


This was once the source of the Thames; the British river now surfaces 8 kilometers (around 5 miles) away

This picture shows the original source of the Thames in February 2006. That year, drought caused the source of the river to shift 1.5 kilometers (1 mile) to the southeast. This summer, conditions have gotten so bad that the Thames surfaces over 8 kilometers downstream from its official starting point.

Loire's nuclear responsibility

People associate the Loire with France's picturesque river landscapes and fairy-tale castles — but its banks are also home to the Belleville nuclear power plant.

This is no coincidence: Nuclear power plants are always situated near water because they need it for cooling. The Belleville plant discharges the water that it has used as coolant into the Loire, and refills its cooling towers with fresh water from the river.


The Belleville nuclear power plant uses water from the Loire as a coolant


To protect the flora and fauna in and around the river, strict rules govern the degree to which power plants are allowed to raise the temperature of the river water. Once the maximum permitted temperature is reached, the nuclear power plants have to reduce their output — meaning they produce less electricity.

To top it off, this is occurring in a hot summer when the French are likely to have their fans and air conditioners on at full blast and Russia has stopped supplying France with gas via pipelines.

Danube's dipping oxygen


Water temperatures in the Danube are already dangerously high this summer — and water levels are low. In early August, the temperature of the river where it flows through the Upper Palatinate region of Bavaria was over 25 degrees Celsius (77 Fahrenheit) for seven days straight. The regional government there has warned that it can be expected to rise to over 26.5 degrees Celsius.

The water in the Danube — seen here near Straubing in Bavaria — isn't just very low, it's also too hot

The heat affects the oxygen content of the water, which could drop below six parts per million — a level that low would spell death for some fish in the Danube, including trout. Consequently, the district government has declared an alert level that allows it to ban dredging in the river and other measures that would worsen the ecological situation. It can also require wastewater treatment plants to suspend operations. This may be enough to save the trout.

This article was originally written in German.


Tourist boats marooned, farm land parched as drought lowers Europe's rivers






Drought affected Doubs river in Les Brenets

Tue, August 9, 2022
By Denis Balibouse

VILLERS-LE-LAC, France (Reuters) - Business for Francoise Droz-Bartholet has reduced to a trickle, just like stretches of the Doubs River straddling the French-Swiss border that her cruise boats usually ply.

Water levels in rivers, lakes and reservoirs across western Europe are running low, or even dry, amid the severest drought in decades which is putting stress on drinking water supplies, hampering river freight and tourism and threatening crop yields.

The Doubs river should coarse through a forested canyon and cascade over waterfalls before spilling out into Brenets Lake, a draw for tourists in eastern France's Jura region. After months without meaningful rain, the river water has receded up the canyon and sluggishly reaches the lake in a narrow channel.

"We hope this drought is an exception to the rule," said Droz-Bartholet, whose bookings are 20% lower than usual for the time of year.

She now has to bus clients along the gorge to a starting point further upstream to a point in the river where there is enough water for her cruise boats to navigate.

Asked how his boat tour had gone, holidaymaker Alain Foubert said simply: "It was a lot shorter than normal."

Conditions have deteriorated across Europe as multiple heatwaves roll across the continent.

In Spain, farmers in the south fear a harsh drought may reduce olive oil output by nearly a third in the world's largest producer. In France, which like Spain has had to contend with recent wildfires, trucks are delivering water to dozens of villages without water.

In Germany, cargo vessels cannot sail fully loaded along the Rhine, a major artery for freight, and along Italy's longest river, the Po, large sandbanks now bake in the sun as water levels recede sharply. In July, Italy declared a state of emergency for areas surrounding the Po, which accounts for more than a third of the country's agricultural production.

As France contends with a fourth heatwave this week, many scientists say the blistering temperatures so far this summer are line with the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather episodes in Europe.

Britain's weather service on Tuesday issued an amber "Extreme Heat" warning for parts of England and Wales, with no respite in sight from hot dry conditions that have sparked fires, broken temperature records and strained the nation's infrastructure.

On the Doubs River, fewer boat tourists means fewer meals to serve for restaurateur Christophe Vallier - a painful blow just as he hoped to recover from the COVID-19 downturn. And he sees little cause for hope in the future.

"All the Doubs experts say the river is getting drier and drier," Vallier lamented.

(Reporting by Denis Balibouse; Writing by Richard Lough; Editing by Susan Fenton)


https://libcom.org/article/murdering-dead-amadeo-bordiga-capitalism-and-other-disasters-antagonism

Jul 6, 2009 ... Murdering the dead: Amadeo Bordiga on capitalism and other disasters - Antagonism ... Antagonism's introduction to a collection of articles by ...

Lawmakers in India pass energy conservation bill


 A full moon rises from behind residential buildings in Greater Noida, a suburb of New Delhi, India, May 7, 2020. The Indian government took a step toward their climate goals by passing amendments to an energy conservation bill, making it easier to put a price on carbon emissions on polluting industries and encouraging the use of non-fossil fuel sources to generate power across the country.
 (AP Photo/Altaf Qadri, File)More

SIBI ARASU
Tue, August 9, 2022


BENGALURU, India (AP) — India took another step toward meeting its climate goals Tuesday when lawmakers in parliament’s lower house approved legislation that would require greater use of renewable energy and force industrial polluters to pay a price for the carbon they emit.

The bill sets out a minimum requirement for renewable energy use for corporations and residential buildings. It also grants clean energy users carbon-saving certificates that can be sold or traded and lays out a new energy efficiency standard in homes, which account for 24% of India’s electricity use.

There are also penalties for corporations who aren't using an adequate amount of renewable energy sources to power their operations.

The legislation will now go through parliament’s upper house.

The bill is “a positive step” towards India's climate targets, said Madhura Joshi, India energy transitions lead at E3G, a climate change think tank.

“The share of clean energy sources powering India’s industries and homes will definitely increase as a result of this bill,” he said.

Last week, India committed to reducing emissions caused by activities for the nation’s economic growth by 45% by 2030 from 2005 levels. The country also plans to get half of its energy requirements from non-fossil fuel-based energy sources by 2030, and promote a federal government program that encourages people to make green lifestyle changes.

“Every unit of energy saved or conserved is critical for reducing emissions,” said Bharath Jairaj who leads the World Resources Institute’s India energy program. Including large residential buildings into building codes that require energy conservation is a key highlight of the bill and reducing emissions, he said.

Scientists say cutting greenhouse gases is essential for limiting the effects of climate change, which has already brought hotter weather and more devastating floods to India.

The bill is also the first time the Indian government has proposed a carbon trading system. Unlike in a few other parts of the world, the so-called carbon market is still a fledgling idea in India, Jairaj said.

It is “bound to become an important tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in India,” he added.


ESG Strategy: Battling Climate Change Alongside Inflation


Madison Ratcliff
Tue, August 9, 2022 

Recent geopolitical and economic issues throughout the world have forced oil and gas corporations to step back and reevaluate their operations—including how much capital they invest toward ESG initiatives.

In Europe, Russia is threatening retaliation for EU-imposed sanctions that will limit the amount of energy products imported from the country, leading many to worry about energy shortages come winter and wondering how the U.S. will be affected. Inflation is also on the rise in the U.S., with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting the consumer price index increasing 9.1% in June—the largest price hike since 1981—leading to higher oil prices as well as higher gas prices.

Taking these concerns into account, the first and foremost priority of global governments right now in regards to energy is securing affordable and reliable energy, as opposed to battling the industry’s effect on climate change, Nick Volkmer, president of ESG and renewables at Enverus, told Hart Energy.

“In the realm of 90% of global GDP has some sort of net-zero target, and a lot of these are fairly high level,” he said. “But it means it’s a component in the decision process, and I think, on the opposite side of the same coin, what’s being solidified over the last few months here is that the No. 1 priority of any government is going to be energy security, and the secondary priority is going to be energy sustainability.”

However, the oil and gas industry has not found itself in an either-or situation. Though it will take adjustments, operators don’t have to choose between increasing traditional oil and gas production to combat inflation and ESG-focused sustainable operations to combat climate change.

According to analysts from consultancies Enverus and Rystad Energy, battling climate change is still an important goal, and there are ways to do so while strengthening traditional energy output.
Investment criteria

Investors in the oil and gas space have been vocal about their ESG-related criteria for delegating funds in the past few years, but in light of socioeconomic and geopolitical issues—skyrocketing inflation, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, energy insecurity—that might not be as big of an issue for companies in need of capital.

“… What’s being solidified over the last few months here is that the No. 1 priority of any government is going to be energy security, and the secondary priority is going to be energy sustainability.”—Nick Volkmer, Enverus

In a report Rystad Energy conducted in June on how E&P sustainability strategies affected market performance, the study showed that the companies who ranked the lowest in ESG ranked higher in the market in the short term, but companies ranking higher in ESG performed better in the long term.

“Overall, it is fair to say that ESG performance does impact investor appetite, even though during the latest market recovery of 2021, ESG scores haven’t been the lead indicator of stock growth,” the report stated. “As such, ESG performance affects the ownership profile of the energy sector with sustainability-focused investors diversifying into the other sectors.”

According to Alisa Lukash, vice president of shale research at Rystad Energy, investors are more supportive of companies with lower ESG scores, not because they don’t value ESG, but because companies with lower scores are usually the ones who are worse off financially and need more financial backing.

“Short-term ESG performance is actually not as important as the other fundamental aspects of the value for the companies, but looking long-term five years or so, then we’ll see this fact that stronger financial aid companies still have stronger energy performance,” she told Hart Energy.

Additionally, investors have changed the way they invest in different energy companies and how they choose to allocate funds because of new government policies. In Europe, Volkmer explained how governmental bodies have reclassified nuclear and natural gas investments as more environmentally friendly, qualifying them for different subsidies.

“That helps incentivize some different domestic industries, a good example being the LNG industry in the U.S.,” he continued. “All of these things are interconnected, and at its heart, it’s about trying to follow that carbon path to ultimately provide the most energy for the world in a relatively sustainable way.”

What can be done?

While establishing energy security remains the primary focus for oil and gas companies for the foreseeable future, the progress they’ve made toward sustainable operations isn’t simply going away.

According to Volkmer, the top three things to focus on are eliminating flaring, getting better at monitoring and managing methane leaks and reducing combustion emissions where possible.


“Short-term ESG performance is actually not as important as the other fundamental aspects of the value for the companies…”—Alisa Lukash, Rystad Energy

Reducing or removing the byproducts of hydrocarbon production are things that a majority of environmentally conscious operators were already doing anyway, so remaining vigilant in these practices can serve as an easy win.

“The environmentally conscious operators that we see are leaders in those three categories and are continuing to make strides to drive those down to zero because in the end, a lot of those aspects are just byproducts from developing the hydrocarbons, and they don’t really necessarily provide a true net benefit to oil and gas companies or to the public,” Volkmer continued.

Lukash echoed Volkmer’s concerns about flaring, adding, “The easiest thing to do is, of course, to think a little bit about how to structure and what type of activity schedule to create to avoid those bottlenecks, what type of contracts to get with the pipelines, etc.”

In addition to reducing flaring, Lukash recommended operators avoid traditional frac fleets to the best of their ability, instead suggesting electric frac fleets and other ways to electrify their operations as a short-term solution to reducing emissions.

In terms of long-term solutions, she noted that investing in water management infrastructure would be a beneficial means of boosting ESG scores, although it was the kind of solution that would require more funds.

“Water management is a bit more time consuming as operators would really have to invest in better infrastructure and thinking about the ways to reduce the fresh water use in the region,” she said. “And it’s very different in different states across the U.S., but there are ways, of course, to share the infrastructure with some of the nearby operators as well.”

Overall, though, Lukash insisted that most midsize or smaller E&Ps focused on ESG would benefit from having “better planning in terms of output” to secure the environmentally friendly initiatives they want to implement.

“That is kind of more linked to the strategy and planning and understanding the landscape where they're operating, and of course, that would require more of an investment into the infrastructure overall and figuring out the ways to further reduce emissions and residual flaring, etc.,” she said.