Thursday, September 21, 2023

 

Should we screen all newborns for neurodevelopmental disorders?


Pediatric and ethics experts argue universal screening would worsen health disparities

Reports and Proceedings

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER



Expanding newborn screening (NBS) to include identifying genes associated with an increased risk for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) would cause more harm than good, according to an article published in Pediatrics. While some experts believe early identification of NDDs in the newborn period would provide an equitable way to flag and treat disabilities early, the authors of the new paper contend that broader genomic sequencing would worsen existing health disparities.   

“The benefit of early genomic screening hinges upon the ability to identify children with NDD early and then provide timely access to therapeutic supports,” said lead author, Sarah Sobotka, MD, assistant professor of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics at the University of Chicago. “The reality is that we’re practicing in a context where there are few supports and disparate access to care for children already identified as having an NDD.”

Given the dire shortage of genetics experts and diagnosticians in the U.S., Sobotka and co-author Lainie Ross, MD, PhD, chair of the Department of Health Humanities and Bioethics and director of the Paul M Schyve MD Center for Bioethics at the University of Rochester, recommend strategic use of NDD screening on populations of children who actually show signs of developmental delays.

Ambiguity and the Problem of Access

Researchers have yet to prove that genotype (genetic makeup) and phenotype (signs or behavior that are manifested outwardly) are scientifically matched. This can raise alarms and, in some cases, lead to over-treating disorders that may never manifest in a child.

Families may receive a diagnosis and label children based on the premise that a genetic variant means a child has an NDD or will develop one in the future. This can lead to stigma and self-fulfilling prophecy, causing harm to those who never display signs or symptoms. 

Further exacerbation stems from the fact that there is an inadequate supply of trained therapists to provide the services needed for children with NDDs. Increasing early identification of those at risk who may never present with developmental delays would inevitably favor those with resources—children whose parents are more poised to advocate—widening the gap for minoritized groups who already struggle to access care.

Data That Lack Diversity

The authors argue that our current body of genetic population data is also skewed because the majority of participants in genetic research have been members of the white middle-class. This could naturally lead to more diagnoses for children in those groups—hence, quicker access to early interventions that would leave others who need urgent help behind, especially if they are in a minoritized group that has not yet been adequately studied.

Not only do we not have enough genetic diagnosticians to meet demand for broad testing, we don’t have adequate genetic information about variants in diverse communities, Ross explains.

“If we wait to test the children until they manifest signs of delays, we can actually start looking for other genetic variants within those populations so when early genomic testing is proposed again in 10 or 20 years, we will have a better understanding of the extent to which these genotypes will correlate with NDD phenotypes,” said Ross, who is both a bioethicist and a pediatrician. “We’ll also have collected a much more diverse set of genotypes, so we will actually be looking for these differences in all populations.”

A New Approach to Early Screening

While Sobotka and Ross oppose broad genomic sequencing of newborns, they are not against early screening for NDD. They argue the best way to do that is not through universal NBS programs but focusing resources on early identification by general pediatricians during routine well-child visits by using standardized screening assessment tools as well as referrals from head-start programs or other early childhood education programs.

We need to identify neurodevelopmental delays in children early,” said Sobotka, “and we need to provide enrichment opportunities, when possible, to prevent delays from developing.”  As Sobotka points out, such supports include not only educational interventions but also supportive family leave policies that encourage early parent-child attachment and parent-child interactive activities. “There are population-based interventions proven to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes that we are still not doing. These should be our first public-health initiatives; not expanding NBS.”

 

How bats evolved to avoid cancer


Peer-Reviewed Publication

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS USA

Artibeus Jamaicensis 

IMAGE: ARTIBEUS JAMAICENSIS, THE JAMAICAN FRUIT BAT view more 

CREDIT: BROCK AND SHERRI FENTON/GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION




A new paper in Genome Biology and Evolution, published by Oxford University Press, shows that rapid evolution in bats may account for the animals’ extraordinary ability to both host and survive infections as well as avoid cancer. 

Bats are exceptional among mammals for not only their ability to fly but also their long lives, low cancer rates, and robust immune systems. Bats are also thought to have played a role in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. The ability of bats to tolerate viral infections may stem from unusual features of their innate immune response.

These characteristics make bats an interesting animal to investigate, because they may have implications for human health. For example, by better understanding the mechanisms of the bat immune system that allow bats to tolerate viral infections, researchers may be better able to prevent disease outbreaks from animals to people. Comparative genomic analyses of bats and cancer-susceptible mammals may eventually provide new information on the causes of cancer and the links between cancer and immunity. Studies of bats and other organisms complement studies based on mouse models; mice are more amenable than bats to experimental manipulation but exhibit fewer characteristics with implications for human disease.

Here researchers using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read platform, and bat samples collected with help from the American Museum of Natural History in Belize, sequenced the genomes of two bat species, the Jamaican fruit bat and the Mesoamerican mustached bat, and carried out a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis with a diverse collection of bats and other mammals.

The researchers found genetic adaptations in six DNA repair-related proteins and 46 proteins in bats that were cancer-related, meaning that researchers have previously found such proteins suppress cancer. Notably, the study found these altered cancer-related genes were enriched more than two-fold in the bat group compared to other mammals.

“By generating these new bat genomes and comparing them to other mammals we continue to find extraordinary new adaptations in antiviral and anticancer genes,” said the paper’s lead author, Armin Scheben. “These investigations are the first step towards translating research on the unique biology of bats into insights relevant to understanding and treating aging and diseases, such as cancer, in humans.”

The paper, “Long-read sequencing reveals rapid evolution of immunity and cancer-related genes in bats,” is available (at midnight on September 20th) at: https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/15/9/evad148/7259420.

Direct correspondence to: 
Armin Scheben
Simons Center for Quantitative Biology,
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Cold Spring Harbor, NY
scheben@cshl.edu

To request a copy of the study, please contact:
Daniel Luzer 
daniel.luzer@oup.com

LOOK OUT 2024

A hot summer led to more malaria deaths the following year


Reports and Proceedings

UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG

Malaria mosquitos 

IMAGE: MALARIA WAS ONCE THOUGHT TO BE CAUSED BY THE SMELL OF STAGNANT WATER (HENCE THE NAME MALE ARIA = BAD AIR) view more 

CREDIT: GORAN VIGNJEVIĆ



As climate change accelerates, it is becoming increasingly important to study the impact of climate change on human health. A new thesis from the University of Gothenburg examines church records and historical weather data in the Nordic countries to show that the risk of dying from malaria was higher if the previous summer was a hot one.

The growing impact of climate change on human health is an acute global threat in the 21st century. The rise in certain types of extreme weather events is not only affecting individuals, but also putting ecosystems that are closely linked to our health under pressure.

“As the climate grows warmer, there is a risk of insect-borne diseases returning to areas from which they were previously eradicated. Malaria was prevalent in the Nordic countries up until the start of the 20th century, and we can learn from historical malaria outbreaks to improve resilience in the future,” says Tzu-Tung Chen, a doctoral student at the University of Gothenburg who has examined the link between weather conditions and malaria deaths in the Nordic countries in the pre-industrial era.

The impact of climate on mortality

The findings reveal that climate had a clear impact on both malaria transmission and mortality in Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Malaria outbreaks were able to be linked to warm summers in the preceding year, while higher all-cause mortality followed if the spring was cold. Precipitation played a lesser role in this context.

“The higher mortality rate after a cold spring may be due to people being less resilient as a result of food shortages when harvests failed. A warm summer in the previous year allowed more malaria-infected mosquitoes to hatch, which then overwintered indoors before starting to bite people the following year,” says Tzu-Tung Chen.

Parish registers

Tzu-Tung Chen established the link between malaria deaths and weather conditions by examining data on causes of death from church registers kept in each parish together with weather data for the period studied, 1749–1859. There was a clear link, although it is likely that other factors such as overcrowding also contributed to the variations in these complex connections.

“But at least 20 per cent of variations in malaria deaths can be explained by climate. Dying of malaria was quite common in this period. It is estimated that about 1–2 per cent of all deaths was caused by the mosquito-borne virus, often called ‘chills’ in church registers,” says Tzu-Tung Chen.

Several perspectives

The impact of a warmer climate in the Nordic countries on insect-borne diseases involves several factors. Firstly, there will be a larger area in the Nordic region where the environment becomes suitable for disease spreading insects; secondly, the season in which these insects are active and can spread the disease will be longer, and finally, the risk of seeing more infected cases may become higher.

 “We are already seeing dengue fever, Zika virus and West Nile virus moving further north in Europe as the tiger mosquitoes that carry these diseases become established.” 

 

How will sea level rise affect the health of freshwater mussels and other salt-sensitive species?


Peer-Reviewed Publication

WILEY




Investigators recently studied several species of freshwater mussels, which are endangered and are especially sensitive to changes in water quality, to explore the ramifications of sea-level rise in coastal rivers. The research published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry determined the concentration of sea salt that would harm the viability of young mussels.

The study focused on the ecosystems along the southeastern US coast, where sea-level measurements have indicated rising waters from 2 to 6mm per year. By detailing the levels in which salt water is toxic to mussels at various life stages, the results can provide guidance for conservation programs that consider climate-induced sea level rise and saltwater intrusion that will affect numerous salt-sensitive species.

“Climate change represents a serious threat to our aquatic ecosystems worldwide and the organisms that live there,” said corresponding author Joseph McIver, MS, of North Carolina State University. “Protecting and conserving our already highly imperiled freshwater mussels is of paramount importance and our research on the effects of salinity and sea level rise will hopefully contribute valuable information toward these goals.”

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5731

 

Additional Information
NOTE: 
The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) publishes papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry, and hazard/risk assessment. ET&C is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences.

About Wiley
Wiley is a knowledge company and a global leader in research, publishing, and knowledge solutions. Dedicated to the creation and application of knowledge, Wiley serves the world’s researchers, learners, innovators, and leaders, helping them achieve their goals and solve the world's most important challenges. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookTwitterLinkedIn and Instagram.

Disclaimer: AAAS a

 

Study reveals the most important considerations for grizzly bear conservation

Peer-Reviewed Publication

WILEY

Humans negatively impact the health of grizzly bear populations through top-down influences like direct mortality associated with forestry roads (from conflict or illegal killings) and displacement from high quality habitats, and through bottom-up influences like reducing availability of food resources. Research published in Wildlife Monographs reveals the relationship between these forces, informing a strategic conservation program.

Investigators radio-collared and followed numerous grizzly bears over multiple years in southeastern British Columbia. They found an interesting interplay between the most important bottom-up factor, huckleberry patches, and mortality risk from forestry roads (road density and the amount of secure habitat away from roads). Top-down influences were not only associated with mortality risk, but they limited contributions of critical food resources, reducing female grizzly fitness and density, in essence having a similar effect as habitat loss. This doubly negative effect likely contributes to the ubiquitous detriment that high forestry road density confers to grizzly bear populations in western North America.

The findings highlight the importance of considering both bottom-up and top-down influences affecting wildlife populations. “The securing of important food resources to make them accessible to bears is accomplished through some degree of restriction of human access,” said lead author Michael Proctor, PhD, of Birchdale Ecological Ltd. “Our results suggest that benefits of critical bear foods are not satisfactorily realized unless human access to nearby roads is reduced.”

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.1078

 

Additional Information
NOTE: 
The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
Wildlife Monographs, one of three peer-reviewed journals of The Wildlife Society, publishes research regarding the management and conservation of wildlife, emphasizing comprehensive synthesis of a topic.

About Wiley
Wiley is a knowledge company and a global leader in research, publishing, and knowledge solutions. Dedicated to the creation and application of knowledge, Wiley serves the world’s researchers, learners, innovators, and leaders, helping them achieve their goals and solve the world's most important challenges. For more than two centuries, Wiley has been delivering on its timeless mission to unlock human potential. Visit us at Wiley.com. Follow us on FacebookTwitterLinkedIn and Instagram.

 

Cognitive behavioral therapy eases how fibromyalgia pain is experienced by the brain


A randomized, controlled trial led by Mass General Brigham researchers demonstrates that cognitive behavioral therapy can significantly reduce the impact of fibromyalgia pain


Peer-Reviewed Publication

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM




Patients living with fibromyalgia (FM) – a disease that predominantly affects women and is characterized by chronic pain, fatigue and brain fog – often find limited treatment options and a scarcity of explanations for their symptoms. Research led by Mass General Brigham investigators has found that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can significantly reduce the burden of FM by, in part, reducing pain-catastrophizing, a negative cognitive and emotional response that can intensify pain through feelings of helplessness, rumination and intrusive thoughts. This finding is backed by neuroimaging data, evidencing reduced connectivity between regions of the brain associated with self-awareness, pain and emotional processing. Results are published on September 20 in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

“In this study, we looked at the interplay between psychological processes and the brain's connectivity patterns in response to pain,” said co-senior author Robert Edwards, PhD, a clinical psychologist in the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. “We wanted to explore how CBT, a talk therapy aimed at combatting maladaptive thoughts, can enhance individuals’ daily functioning and alter the brain’s processing of pain-related information.”

Edwards explains that CBT can reduce negative cognitive and emotional responses to pain. He says that while these responses are normal, they can amplify the disabling effects of chronic pain, and make conditions like FM more burdensome.

The research team for the study included researchers from three Mass General Brigham members: Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. Mass General Brigham brings together 16 member institutions, including academic medical centers, top-tier specialty hospitals, community hospitals and more. Research that spans more than one of these entities is more than the sum of its parts, helping to provide insights and unique perspectives from multiple settings and areas of expertise.

Researchers recruited 98 women, randomly assigning 64 to a treatment group receiving CBT and 34 to a control group that received education about FM and chronic pain but was not taught specific CBT techniques. All participants were between 18 and 75 years old and had a confirmed FM diagnosis for at least six months. To collect baseline data, all participants completed several validated pain and quality of life questionnaires.

Each group participated in eight intervention sessions, consisting of 60–75-minute visits with a licensed mental health provider. Participants were primarily assessed for their levels of pain interference, or a measure of how much their pain disrupted their daily activities, pain catastrophizing, pain severity and the overall impact FM had on patients’ quality of life.

Results demonstrated that those who underwent CBT experienced significantly greater reductions in pain interference. CBT participants also exhibited significantly less pain catastrophizing and reported that their FM symptoms had significantly less impact on their daily lives.

The team saw evidence that after undergoing CBT, patients experienced changes in the activities of all three networks that suggested a diminished focus on pain.

“Prior to participants undergoing CBT, we saw that certain parts of the brain linked to self-awareness and sensation were very connected, suggesting patients were pertinently aware of the pain sensation they were experiencing and internalized these symptoms,” said co-first author Jeungchan Lee, PhD, an instructor in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation based at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital. “After CBT, these connections were significantly less strong, suggesting that patients were better at separating themselves from their pain after therapy.”

This study was limited to women, partly because of its high prevalence, and partly to eliminate confounding gender differences in brain activity. In the future, the researchers hope to collect data from men and non-binary patients with FM. Additionally, CBT includes several therapeutic components, and these results cannot be generalized to assess the impact across all forms of CBT on reducing FM chronic pain.

Both Lee and Edwards agree that these findings ultimately suggest that complex chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia should be addressed with a multitude of pharmacological and cognitive therapies.

“I hope that these findings motivate healthcare providers to consider CBT as an effective treatment option to reduce the impact of pain patients experience,” explained Edwards. “Chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia involve long-standing patterns of changes in the central nervous system, and CBT is one among many treatment options, such as medication and physical therapy, that we know can be beneficial for those living with FM.”

Authorship: Other Mass General Brigham authors of this study include co-first author Asimina Lazaridou (Brigham and Women’s Hospital), Myrella Paschali (Brigham and Women’s Hospital), Marco L. Loggia (Massachusetts General Hospital), Michael P. Berry (Massachusetts General Hospital), Kylie Isenburg (Massachusetts General Hospital), Alessandra Anzolin (Massachusetts General Hospital and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital), Arvina Grahl (Massachusetts General Hospital and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital), and co-senior author Vitaly Napadow (Massachusetts General Hospital and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital). Other authors include Dan-Mikael Ellingsen and Ajay D. Wasan.

Disclosures: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding: Supported by the National Institutes of Health: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01-AT007550, R33-AT009306, P01-AT009965), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01-AR064367, R01- AR079110), and the National Center for Research Resources (P41RR14075, S10RR021110, S10RR023043).

###

About Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.