Tuesday, April 22, 2025

SPACE/COSMOS

Innovative approaches advance search for ice on the moon




University of Hawaii at Manoa

Future cosmic ray radar instrument 

image: 

An artist rendering of what a future cosmic ray radar instrument could look like, attached to a satellite orbiting the Moon. 

view more 

Credit: Christian Miki, Department of Physics, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa





Scientists and space explorers have been on the hunt to determine where and how much ice is present on the Moon. Water ice would be an important resource at a future lunar base, as it could be used to support humans or be broken down to hydrogen and oxygen, key components of rocket fuel. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa researchers are using two innovative approaches to advance the search for ice on the Moon.

ShadowCam scouts for surface ice 

Water ice was previously detected in the permanently shaded regions of the Moon’s north and south poles by Shuai Li, assistant researcher at the Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology (HIGP) in the UH Mānoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST).  A new study led by Jordan Ando, planetary sciences graduate student in Li’s laboratory, examined images from a specialized camera, the “ShadowCam,” that was on board the Korea Aerospace Research Institute Korea Lunar Pathfinder Orbiter. 

Craters in the Moon’s polar regions receive no direct sunlight, but sunlight that bounces off of one side of a crater can indirectly illuminate another side. The ShadowCam, designed specifically to look only at the dark, permanently shaded areas on the Moon, is extremely sensitive to the indirect light reflected off the lunar surface.

“Ice is generally brighter, that is, reflects more light, than rocks,” said Ando. “We analyzed high-quality images from this sensitive camera to look really closely into these permanently shaded areas and investigate whether water ice in these regions leads to widespread brightening of the surface.”

While the ice in the shaded regions did not significantly brighten the surface, the team’s analysis of the ShadowCam images helps to refine the estimate of the amount of ice that could be on the lunar surface. Li’s previous method suggested that the lunar surface contains between five and 30 percent water ice. The analysis of Shadow Cam images narrows the range—indicating that water ice makes up less than 20 percent of the lunar surface. 

Cosmic rays help search for buried ice

In addition to these investigations of lunar ice at the surface, another group of UH Mānoa researchers with HIGP and Department of Physics and Astronomy recently published a study in Geophysical Research Letters that outlines an innovative approach to detect buried ice deposits at the Moon’s poles.

“With our recent study, we showed that a new technique for detecting buried water ice on the Moon is possible using naturally-occurring cosmic rays,” said Emily S. Costello, study lead author and postdoctoral researcher at HIGP. “These ultra-high-energy cosmic rays strike the lunar surface and penetrate to the layers below. The rays emit radar waves that bounce off buried ice and rock layers, which we can use to infer what’s below the surface.”

The team used an advanced computer simulation that tests how radar waves travel through the lunar soil and how they encode information about possible buried ice layers.

“This method for searching for water ice on the Moon is brand new and really exciting,” said Christian Tai Udovicic, a co-author on the study who presented the findings at the recent Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston, Texas. “Since it relies on high-energy physics that only a few scientists in the world are experts in, even planetary scientists who are studying ways to find lunar water ice are often surprised when they hear about this technique.”

A team of HIGP and Physics Department researchers are working to assemble a radar instrument specifically tuned to listen for these signals on the Moon and hope to test the full system by early 2026. They will look for opportunities to send it to the Moon to hopefully detect large deposits of buried water ice on the Moon for the first time. 

“More and more, Hawai‘i is becoming a hub for space exploration, and specifically the exploration of the Moon,” said Costello. “These projects, led by UH Mānoa scientists, represent up-and-coming opportunities for students and professionals in Hawai‘i to lead and participate in the budding space industry.”   


An artist's depiction of what could be large buried ice deposits below cold, permanently shadowed regions on the Moon. The UH Manoa researchers' technique could reveal the first evidence of thin ice layers at 5-10 m depth. 

Credit

Costello et al. 2025. ​​​​​​​




Permanently shaded regions on the Moon’s north (L) and south (R) poles were investigated for water ice.

Credit

Shuai Li


Astronomers discover a planet that’s rapidly disintegrating, producing a comet-like tail


The small and rocky lava world sheds an amount of material equivalent to the mass of Mount Everest every 30.5 hours.




Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Disintegrating Planet 

image: 

A disintegrating planet orbits a giant star. “The extent of the tail is gargantuan, stretching up to 9 million kilometers long,” says Marc Hon, a postdoc in MIT’s Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research.  

view more 

Credit: Jose-Luis Olivares, MIT




MIT astronomers have discovered a planet some 140 light-years from Earth that is rapidly crumbling to pieces. 

The disintegrating world is about the mass of Mercury, although it circles about 20 times closer to its star than Mercury does to the sun, completing an orbit every 30.5 hours. At such close proximity to its star, the planet is likely covered in magma that is boiling off into space. As the roasting planet whizzes around its star, it is shedding an enormous amount of surface minerals and effectively evaporating away. 

The astronomers spotted the planet using NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), an MIT-led mission that monitors the nearest stars for transits, or periodic dips in starlight that could be signs of orbiting exoplanets. The signal that tipped the astronomers off was a peculiar transit, with a dip that fluctuated in depth every orbit. 

The scientists confirmed that the signal is of a tightly orbiting rocky planet that is trailing a long, comet-like tail of debris. 

“The extent of the tail is  gargantuan, stretching up to 9 million kilometers long, or roughly half of the planet’s entire orbit,” says Marc Hon, a postdoc in MIT’s Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research.  

It appears that the planet is disintegrating at a dramatic rate, shedding an amount of material equivalent to one Mount Everest each time it orbits its star. At this pace, given its small mass, the researchers predict that the planet may completely disintegrate in about 1 million to 2 million years.

“We got lucky with catching it exactly when it’s really going away,” says Avi Shporer, a collaborator on the discovery who is also at the TESS Science Office. “It’s like on its last breath.”

Hon and Shporer, along with their colleagues, will publish their results in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. Their MIT co-authors include Saul Rappaport, Andrew Vanderburg, Jeroen Audenaert, William Fong, Jack Haviland, Katharine Hesse, Daniel Muthukrishna, Glen Petitpas, Ellie Schmelzer, Sara Seager, and George Ricker, along with collaborators from multiple other institutions.

Roasting away

The new planet, which scientists have tagged as BD+05 4868 Ab, was detected almost by happenstance. 

“We weren’t looking for this kind of planet,” Hon says. “We were doing the typical planet vetting, and I happened to spot this signal that appeared very unusual.”

The typical signal of an orbiting exoplanet looks like a brief dip in a light curve, which repeats regularly, indicating that a compact body such as a planet is briefly passing in front of, and temporarily blocking, the light from its host star. 

This typical pattern was unlike what Hon and his colleagues detected from the host star BD+05 4868 A, located in the constellation of Pegasus. Though a transit appeared every 30.5 hours, the brightness took much longer to return to normal, suggesting a long trailing structure still blocking starlight. Even more intriguing, the depth of the dip changed with each orbit, suggesting that whatever was passing in front of the star wasn’t always the same shape or blocking the same amount of light. 

“The shape of the transit is typical of a comet with a long tail,” Hon explains. “Except that it’s unlikely that this tail contains volatile gases and ice as expected from a real comet — these would not survive long at such close proximity to the host star. Mineral grains evaporated from the planetary surface, however, can linger long enough to present such a distinctive tail.” 

Given its proximity to its star, the team estimates that the planet is roasting at around 1,600 degrees Celsius, or close to 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. As the star roasts the planet, any minerals on its surface are likely boiling away and escaping into space, where they cool into a long and dusty tail. 

The dramatic demise of this planet is a consequence of its low mass, which is between that of Mercury and the moon. More massive terrestrial planets like the Earth have a stronger gravitational pull and therefore can hold onto their atmospheres. For BD+05 4868 Ab, the researchers suspect there is very little gravity to hold the planet together. 

“This is a very tiny object, with very weak gravity, so it easily loses a lot of mass, which then further weakens its gravity, so it loses even more mass,” Shporer explains. “It’s a runaway process, and it’s only getting worse and worse for the planet.”

Mineral trail

Of the nearly 6,000 planets that astronomers have discovered to date, scientists know of only three other disintegrating planets beyond our solar system. Each of these crumbling worlds were spotted over 10 years ago using data from NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope. All three planets were spotted with similar comet-like tails. BD+05 4868 Ab has the longest tail and the deepest transits out of the four known disintegrating planets to date. 

“That implies that its evaporation is the most catastrophic, and it will disappear much faster than the other planets,” Hon explains. 

The planet’s host star is relatively close, and thus brighter than the stars hosting the other three disintegrating planets, making this system ideal for further observations using NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which can help determine the mineral makeup of the dust tail by identifying which colors of infrared light it absorbs.

This summer, Hon and graduate student Nicholas Tusay from Penn State University will lead observations of BD+05 4868 Ab using JWST. “This will be a unique opportunity to directly measure the interior composition of a rocky planet, which may tell us a lot about the diversity and potential habitability of terrestrial planets outside our solar system,” Hon says.

The researchers also will look through TESS data for signs of other disintegrating worlds. 

“Sometimes with the food comes the appetite, and we are now trying to initiate the search for exactly these kinds of objects,” Shporer says. “These are weird objects, and the shape of the signal changes over time, which is something that’s difficult for us to find. But it’s something we’re actively working on.”

This work was supported, in part, by NASA.

###

Written by Jennifer Chu, MIT News

 

Difficult and costly energy transition unless the EU invests in biomass




Chalmers University of Technology
Biomass in a European energy system with negative emissions 

image: 

Biomass use in the European energy system: Feasible solution space to achieve net-negative carbon dioxide emissions (-110 percent compared to 1990).
The shaded area shows the possible space, with the used amount of biomass per year on the y-axis and the cost increase (compared to the lowest possible cost) on the x-axis.
The figure also shows how much the amount of biomass can vary within a span where the system cost only increases by 1 per cent. Previous similar studies have typically focused on a single cost-optimal solution, but that is difficult to achieve in practice. In the new study, the researchers have therefore contributed with a flexible solution space where the amount of biomass is almost cost-optimal.

view more 

Credit: Adapted from Millinger et al, CC BY 4.0





Biomass is currently the EU’s largest renewable energy source, but climate strategies often focus on other energy sources. A comprehensive analysis, led by Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden, now shows that biomass is crucial for Europe's ability to reach its climate targets, as it can be used to produce fossil-free fuels and chemicals and also enables carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere. If biomass were excluded from the European energy system, it would cost an extra 169 billion Euros per year – about the same as the cost of excluding wind power.

Biomass, such as energy crops, logging residues, cereal straw and wood waste, is a versatile source of renewable energy that many industries want to use to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass can replace fossil fuels, for example in steel and cement industries and in power plants that supply households with electricity and district heating. It can also replace oil and fossil gas in the production of plastics and chemicals, as well as the production of fuels for vehicles, shipping and aviation.

In addition, biomass can play a key role in an increasingly important part of the climate transition: carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere, via carbon capture and storage (CCS). The carbon atoms in biomass have been absorbed from the air through plant photosynthesis. Normally, when biomass is used for energy the carbon atoms are released back into the air as carbon dioxide. But when bioenergy is combined with CCS, those carbon dioxide emissions are avoided. Biomass use with CCS therefore provides energy along with carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere, which is known as negative emissions.

Rapidly increasing costs if the amount of biomass is reduced

With growing demand for non-fossil alternatives, the competition for renewable resources has intensified – prompting policymakers and industry to address questions about policies and investments into resources and technologies that effectively support the energy sector's climate transition. As biomass has so many uses, scientists are grappling with questions about the role of bioenergy in the energy system. How is the energy sector's climate transition affected by the varying availability of biomass? How and where is biomass best used?

In a paper in Nature Energy, researchers at Chalmers University of Technology, Rise Research Institutes of Sweden and Technische Universität Berlin have carried out a comprehensive analysis and shown what a future European energy system could look like – including electricity, heating, industry and transport.

The researchers investigated two emissions targets for the energy system; one with zero emissions of carbon dioxide and one with negative emissions (minus 110 per cent compared to 1990). The biomass in the system consists mainly of waste material from forestry and agriculture within Europe, plus a more expensive part which can be imported.

The study's lead author Markus Millinger, a researcher at Chalmers when the study was conducted and now a researcher at Rise, notes that biomass plays an unexpectedly important role in the energy transition.

“One thing that surprised us was how quickly it becomes very expensive if we reduce the availability of biomass in the energy system, due to the high costs of alternatives. If biomass is completely excluded, the costs of the energy system with negative emissions would increase by 169 billion Euros annually, compared to the same system with a cost-optimal level of biomass. This is an increase of 20 per cent, which roughly corresponds to the cost of excluding wind power.”

If biomass availability is limited to the current level of biomass use in the European energy system, the additional cost is 5 per cent compared to the cost-optimal level.

“But the financial part is perhaps not the largest problem”, says Markus Millinger. “The big difficulty may be to scale up the alternatives. Even with biomass in the system, it is a real challenge to expand fossil-free energy to the extent needed. Further restrictions on the supply of biomass would make the energy transition very difficult, as even larger amounts of other types of fossil-free energy would be needed.”

“In addition, we would miss out on the opportunity for negative emissions that the utilisation of biomass provides. To then achieve negative emissions in the energy sector, carbon capture directly from the air would instead have to be scaled up to a large extent. This is a significantly more expensive technology that requires an energy input instead of providing a net energy output.”

Capturing carbon dioxide is most important

A central conclusion of the study is that the value of biomass in the energy system is primarily linked to the fact that it contains carbon atoms. Biomass as an energy source is less important. The large-scale technologies we have today to utilise the energy content of biomass, for example by burning it in power plants, can be combined with technologies to capture the carbon dioxide in the waste gases. Then the carbon dioxide can either be stored permanently underground or reused as a building block in products such as fuels and chemicals.

Biomass can thus supply energy and simultaneously enable negative emissions or replace fossil raw materials. And it is the latter opportunities that have now proven to be most important for the climate transition. Consequently, it is crucial that the carbon atoms are captured to be stored or reused efficiently, but it matters less how the energy content of biomass is used.

“As long as the carbon atoms are utilised, it is not crucial in which sector biomass is used, except that it is an advantage to use a small share of the biomass as a flexible reserve for electricity production to strengthen supply reliability”, says Markus Millinger. “Factors such as regional conditions and existing technical infrastructure are therefore important to determine what is most favourable. This means that countries can choose different paths if they want to use biomass to achieve negative emissions – for example via the production of electrical power, heat or biofuels.”

Provides an expanded knowledge base for policy development

The researchers have used an advanced model that includes more technologies and a higher level of detail than previous similar studies. The model also shows how all society sectors affect each other within the energy system. The new study thus provides an expanded knowledge base for policy development – not least linked to biomass and technologies for negative emissions.

“The capture and storage or reuse of carbon dioxide, for example through the production of advanced fuels, is dependent on large investments to get started, and long-term sustainable and reliable value chains need to be built. A market for fossil-free carbon dioxide would significantly strengthen the opportunities for such investments compared to today, when it is primarily the energy that is valued. But this requires that decision-makers create stable policy instruments to realise the great value of fossil-free carbon atoms within the climate transition”, says Markus Millinger.

Technology development and policy have stimulated an increasing utilisation of bioenergy in the EU. But there are also policy instruments that limit its use in various ways, based on concerns about possible negative effects such as higher food prices, deforestation and loss of biodiversity.

“The bioenergy sector is developing in a context where agriculture and forestry are meeting increasing sustainability requirements”, says Göran Berndes, co-author of the study and Professor of Biomass and land use at Chalmers. “Given that the climate transition is expected to increase the pressure on forests and agricultural land, it is important that there are regulatory systems that lead the development in a positive direction.”

“At the same time, bioenergy systems can be designed to contribute to more efficient use of resources and mitigation of the negative environmental effects of current land use. If policy instruments are designed to reward landowners and other actors for 'doing the right thing', this in itself can drive development away from environmentally harmful activities”, says Göran Berndes.

 

 

More about: the study

The paper Diversity of biomass usage pathways to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system has been published in the journal Nature Energy. In connection with the paper, Nature Energy also published a policy overview by the researchers: Biomass exclusion must be weighed against benefits of carbon supply in European energy system.

The authors of the articles are: M. Millinger (Chalmers University of Technology and Rise Research Institutes of Sweden), F. Hedenus, L. Reichenberg and G. Berndes (Chalmers University of Technology), and E. Zeyen and F. Neumann (Technische Universität Berlin).

 

More about: the possibilities of biomass within the energy and climate transition

Biomass from agriculture and forestry is a flexible renewable resource that can be used for many different purposes:

  • Electricity and/or district heating through combustion in power plants or combined heat and power plants.
  • Biofuels and electrofuels for aircraft, ships and cars.
  • Chemicals, plastics and other materials.
  • Process heat for industries, e.g. in steel and cement production.

All of these options can to various extent be combined with carbon dioxide capture from the flue gases. The carbon dioxide can then either be permanently stored underground (CCS, Carbon Capture and Storage) or reused as a building block for various products.

When biomass is the feedstock, CCS results in net-negative emissions. This means removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, as the plants have taken up carbon dioxide from the air, which is ultimately stored underground. This type of carbon capture is called BECC (Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture).

There is also technology for capturing carbon dioxide directly from the air, so-called DAC (Direct Air Capture). DAC requires a substantial energy input, in contrast to BECC, which provides a net energy output along with carbon capture. DAC is also a significantly more expensive option.

Net-negative emissions, via BECC or DAC, play an important role in many countries' climate strategies.

 

More about: the cost of reducing biomass use

The EU and UK have adopted targets of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions for all sectors to comply with the Paris Agreement targets. To achieve such targets, residual greenhouse gas emissions, such as methane emissions in agriculture, need to be offset by carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere; so-called net-negative emissions.

In the new study, the researchers have presented the most cost-effective way to achieve a European energy system with net-negative emissions, resulting in 110 percent lower carbon dioxide emissions than in 1990. Compared to that scenario, the researchers have shown what it would cost to reduce the amount of biomass in the system to different levels, all the way to a total exclusion of biomass, which would increase Europe's costs by €169 billion annually. This approximately corresponds to:

  • 1 per cent of Europe's GDP.
  • Europe's defence expenses before the war against Ukraine.
  • An additional cost of 20 per cent compared to the most cost-effective energy system.
  • The cost of removing all wind power, or all hydrogen produced with electricity, from the energy system.
  • Twice as much as the cost of removing all solar energy from the system.

The researchers have also made the same analysis for a European energy system with zero emissions of carbon dioxide. That scenario would be 14 per cent more expensive if biomass were excluded.

The reason why it is so expensive to reduce the amount of biomass is that it can offer both energy and fossil-free carbon simultaneously. Replacing both of these resources – with more energy from other energy sources as well as direct air capture of carbon dioxide – results in a much higher cost.

 

More about: EU bioenergy policy

Both forestry and agriculture can produce biomass for the energy system, and depending on a variety of factors, bioenergy can be associated with both positive and negative effects in terms of sustainability aspects other than the climate. Within the EU, there is concern about risks associated with the cultivation of energy crops and logging, such as competition with food production, deforestation and loss of biodiversity.

While policies have increased bioenergy development in the EU, there are also policy instruments that limit the use of biomass for energy purposes. For example, restrictions have been introduced on biofuel production from feed and food crops, and further restrictions have been proposed on residues from forestry. In addition, policy instruments that affect agriculture and forestry in general can lead to a limitation of the availability of biomass for energy purposes.


An overview of biomass-, electricity- and fossil-based options to fulfill demands for space and water heating, electricity, process heat and chemicals as well as transport. Biomass-based options can be combined with carbon capture, which competes with direct air capture to provide non-fossil carbon for production of fuels and chemicals, or for negative emissions. The usage of all of these options is cost-optimised to fulfill emissions targets in the European energy system.
Energy flows are shown, except for the dashed lines, which show mass flows of captured carbon (which is optional for each process). The captured carbon can be utilized for hydrocarbon production (CCU), or sequestered (CCS).
Abbreviations: AD = anaerobic digestion, CCU=carbon capture and utilization, CCS=carbon capture and storage, DAC=direct air capture, EV=electric vehicle, SMR=steam methane reforming, SNG=substitute natural gas, V2G=vehicle to grid.

Credit

Millinger et al, CC BY 4.0

 

Insects are disappearing due to agriculture – and many other drivers, new research reveals



New paper highlights 500+ interconnected drivers behind global insect decline




Binghamton University

Large Milkweed Bug Oncopeltus fasciatus 

image: 

Large Milkweed Bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus)
 

view more 

Credit: Louise Woodrich





Insects are disappearing at an alarming rate worldwide, but why? Agricultural intensification tops the list of proposed reasons, but there are many other, interconnected drivers that have an impact, according to new research led by Binghamton University, State University of New York. 

Research on insect decline has surged in recent years, sparked by an alarming 2017 study that suggested that insect populations had declined by 75% in less than three decades. This has led to countless published papers, with scientists hypothesizing different reasons for the decline. 

To better understand the scientific community’s views more broadly, a team of researchers at Binghamton University analyzed more than 175 scientific reviews, which included 500+ hypotheses on different drivers of insect decline. Using this information, they created an interconnected network of 3,000 possible links, including everything from beekeeping to urban sprawl.

“It's really hard to talk to everybody about what everyone thinks. And so instead of getting 600 people into a room, we decided to take an approach where we read every paper that's either a review or a meta-analysis,” said Christopher Halsch, a post-doctoral researcher at Binghamton and lead author of the paper. “The idea was to read them and extract what people say are ‘causal pathways’. For example, agriculture leads to pollution, which leads to insect population decline. Then we built a giant network out of them to see which ideas are more often connected to each other, and which stressors are most often seen as the root causes.”

Examining the massive list of possible links, the most cited driver for insect decline was found to be agricultural intensification, via issues like land-use change and insecticides.

But it’s more complicated than ranking drivers, as systems are interconnected and impact one another. For example, climate might be a driver for insect decline, but there are individual drivers under the umbrella of climate, like extreme precipitation, fire and temperature, which themselves can impact other drivers. It’s a highly connected and synergistic network. 

And still, many ideas are overlooked. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature, for example, has a list of all the potential threats to consider in insect conservation. But huge portions of that list never made an appearance in recent insect decline literature.

“None of the papers mentioned natural disasters,” said Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Eliza Grames, who was part of a recent study showing a 20% loss of butterflies in the U.S. “No papers looked at human intrusions and disturbance, or the effects of war on insects, or railroads. So there are these big areas that we know in general are threats to biodiversity, but the insect decline literature is really just focused on a few big stressors, as opposed to getting into the more specific ones, which are a lot more mechanistic.”

The researchers identified biases in recent literature, most notably those generated from a focus on “popular” and “charismatic” insects like bees and butterflies, despite them being in the vast minority of insect biodiversity.

“Because people have focused so much on pollinators like bees and butterflies, we are limited in identifying conservation actions that benefit other insects,” said Grames.

“Bees are agriculturally important and people care about them. So there is a lot of research priority towards funding research on bees,” added Halsch. “So you get this kind of feedback: if you prioritize research on bees, you learn more about bees.” 

The researchers noted that insect conservation will require managing not just individual drivers but addressing systems from a multi-pronged approach.

“One of the important points we're trying to make in the paper is that conservation actions overly biased towards certain insects or certain stressors will likely be negative for many other insects,” said Halsch. “If we focus too much on bees and butterflies and their conservation, we will miss a lot of other species, most of them in fact.”

The study, "Metasynthesis reveals interconnections among apparent drivers of insect biodiversity loss," will be published in BioScience on April 22.