Monday, December 29, 2025

Unfounded theories blame Australia bushfires on smart meters and lasers

Bushfires destroyed more than a dozen houses along the Central Coast of Australia's New South Wales during a blistering December heatwave, prompting conspiracy theories online that the blazes were triggered by smart meters -- digital energy use meters -- or laser weapons, as nearby plants were "mostly untouched". However, a police investigation has not identified any evidence suggesting the fires were a deliberate act. Authorities also told AFP plenty of vegetation burned during the blaze and the flames torching the homes came from bushland embers.

"According to several firefighters and eyewitness accounts, the fires are reportedly leaping from house to house while leaving nearby trees and surrounding vegetation mostly untouched," reads a Facebook post from an Australia-based user on December 10.

It goes on to suggest that smart power meters -- an upgrade from older models that require manual readings -- or directed energy weapons, such as high-energy lasers, "could be the ignition source". It also adds that "the government will blame 'Climate Change' on the devastation". 

The post, which was shared more than 400 times, includes a picture of a house ablaze, with embedded text reading "NSW wildfires destroy homes, but skip vegetation?"

More than 50 bushfires burned in New South Wales on December 6, destroying a number of homes on the state's mid-north coast (archived link).

Bushfires are a common occurrence in Australia's summer months, and it is not unheard of for dozens of blazes to burn through sparsely populated areas on hot and windy days.

Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post taken on December 29, 2025, with the red X added by AFP

The same image with the embedded text was shared in similar posts by several Australia-based users on Facebook and X, and also circulated widely in Canada and the United States

"The 'smart meters' are being ignited, making way for the 'smart cities'!" commented one user, while another said, "DEW weapon for sure, fire doesn't jump over dry grass and trees and burn houses". 

The claims repeat unfounded conspiracy theories blaming smart meters -- which are now being rolled out nationally in Australia -- and directed energy weapons for major wildfires (archived link). 

The New South Wales government says the meters meet strict health and safety standards set by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). 

AFP has debunked similar false claims surrounding the Los Angeles fires in early 2025 and the Hawaii wildfires in August 2023. 

In a December 10 press release, NSW police said its investigators determined the fire was "likely to have originated in bushland on Nimbin Avenue", situated in the coastal Koolewong suburb (archived link). 

"Forensic examinations at the point of origin have not identified any evidence suggesting the use of ignitable liquids or a deliberate act," the police statement said.

Burned vegetation

A spokesperson for the New South Wales Rural Fire Service also told AFP on December 24 the claims that vegetation was "skipped" by the fires was "not correct" (archived link). 

"There was vegetation that did burn. The size of the fires was 129 hectares."

A spokesperson for the NSW Police also confirmed to AFP in a December 26 email: "There was considerable vegetation destroyed in the fire. It's clearly seen in the news vision."

reverse image search revealed that the circulating picture is similar to Sky News footage of the bushfires in Koolewong published on December 7, where the burning house is shown around the 15-second mark (archived link).

Image
Screenshot comparison between the false post (left) and Sky News footage on YouTube, with the red X added by AFP

Later in the Sky News video, there is footage of razed vegetation next to the house, leaving a blackened mass with nearby trees missing leaves. 

Image
Screenshot of the Sky News footage taken December 26, 2025, 
showing smouldering and burned trees on the bottom right side of the frame

Other photos and videos published by local media show burned bushland alongside affected homes in Koolewong (archived herehere and here).

After 2025 recognition of a Palestinian state, what's next ?


The recognition of the State of Palestine by several Western countries in September, at France’s initiative, stood out as one of the key diplomatic moments of 2025. Largely symbolic for Palestinians, the move raised questions about whether it could break a decades-long geopolitical stalemate.


Issued on: 29/12/2025 
FRANCE24
By:Marc DAOU


This file photo shows Palestinians flying their flags during a rally in support for Gaza and celebrating the latest western nations recognitions of the Palestinian state ahead of the United Nations General Assembly meetings, in the West Bank city of Ramallah on September 23, 2025. © Nasser Nasser, AP

The Palestinian cause scored a symbolic victory in 2025 as several Western countries that had long shown caution or ambiguity formally recognised the State of Palestine.

In September, on the sidelines of the 80th United Nations General Assembly in New York, France, Britain, Portugal, Canada, Australia and Belgium, among others, announced they were recognising Palestine, as Israel continued its war in Gaza and stepped up settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank.
France takes the lead

France played a driving role in the unprecedented wave of recognitions, prompting strong opposition from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejected the creation of a Palestinian state and described it as "a huge reward for terrorism", referring to Hamas and the October 7 attacks.


After years of rhetorical support for a Palestinian state, conditioned on prior peace with Israel, Paris ultimately decided to move to formal recognition on September 22, when President Emmanuel Macron addressed the UN General Assembly.

The decision was presented as an explicit endorsement of the two-state solution, long viewed as the central framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"This recognition is unquestionably a very important moment in the history of this conflict, as well as for French diplomacy, particularly in the way it was carried out," said Jean-Paul Chagnollaud, emeritus professor and honorary president of the Institute for Research and Studies on the Mediterranean and the Middle East (IREMMO). "There is indeed a symbolic dimension, but it is more than that, because it is a significant political act."

"France sought to rally part of the Western world that had previously been reluctant," he added, noting that the broader French initiative led to the New York Declaration, signed by 142 states.

France’s recognition formed part of a wider diplomatic push, including an international conference co-chaired with Saudi Arabia that culminated on September 12 in the UN General Assembly’s adoption of the New York Declaration, which described recognition of the Palestinian state as "essential and indispensable".

The declaration laid out what was described as an "irreversible" roadmap for a political settlement based on the two-state solution and excluded Hamas from any political role in Gaza.

"Ultimately, this kind of recognition comes down to the decision of one person – the president – who, like anyone else, has doubts and hesitations," Chagnollaud said. "Last spring, I wouldn’t have bet a euro on France recognising the (Palestinian) state. But what Emmanuel Macron saw in April, when he travelled close to Gaza during a visit to Egypt, and the atrocities then being committed, pushed him to act."
Limited effects

Despite opening the way for closer bilateral ties and increasing pressure on the Palestinian Authority to pursue reforms, the recognitions remain largely insufficient given the realities on the ground.

Even if France said the move increased pressure on Israel to accept the Gaza ceasefire demanded by US President Donald Trump a couple of weeks after the UN General Assembly, recognition has not ended the occupation, halted settlement expansion or stopped violence against Palestinian civilians. Nor has it sidelined Hamas, which continues to control the Gaza strip.

Without concrete implementation of the New York Declaration, stronger pressure on the Israeli government and a clear US willingness to rebalance power dynamics, the recognitions risk remaining largely symbolic, with little impact on Palestinians’ daily lives.

"The effects are clearly limited and, in some respects, counterproductive," Chagnollaud said. "They are limited because recognition has no direct impact, and because France and the Europeans lack leverage on the ground, unlike the Americans, who are clearly opposed to this recognition and to the New York Declaration."

"The move is counterproductive if all these states that have taken the step of recognition stop there,” he added. “And unfortunately, that is the case since they have not lifted a finger to jointly impose a reality on the ground, for example through sanctions against Israel, which has waged a war that has annihilated an entire society and is doing everything, including in the West Bank, to undermine the very idea of a Palestinian state."

The diplomatic momentum was soon overshadowed by Donald Trump’s peace plan, which succeeded in imposing a ceasefire in Gaza but was structured around US and Israeli security priorities, leaving intact the grievances that fuel violence and undermine prospects for lasting peace.

"We are heading towards the crushing of the Palestinian question, both literally and figuratively,” Chagnollaud said. “I even think that in 2026 we will witness one of the worst periods in Palestinian history."

This article was translated from the original in French by Anaƫlle Jonah.
SHAMEFUL

Panama tears down China ‘friendship’ monument amid US canal control claims

The removal of the Chinese monument near the Panama Canal has exposed rising political and diplomatic tensions surrounding control of the waterway.

China described the act as harmful to relations with Panama. / Reuters Archive

Near the entrance to the Panama Canal, a monument to China's contributions to the interoceanic waterway was torn down Saturday night by order of local authorities.

The move comes as US President Donald Trump has made threats in recent months to retake control of the canal, claiming Beijing has too much influence in its operations.

In a surprising move that leaders in Panama and China have criticised, the mayor's office of the locality of Arraijan ordered the demolition of the monument built in 2004 to symbolise friendship between the countries.

The mayor's office said in a statement that the monument, which overlooked the waterway spanning the Bridge of the Americas, had structural damage that posed a "risk."

But Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino said Sunday that "there is no justification whatsoever for the barbarity committed," calling it "an unforgivable act of irrationality."

After personally inspecting the demolition, China's ambassador to Panama Xu Xueyuan said it was a "great pain for bilateral friendship," noting the insult to 300,000 Chinese-Panamanians.

Some members of the Chinese community witnessed the destruction, but police prevented them from reaching the lookout to stop it, according to videos published by local media.

In a video posted to X, the Chinese embassy called for a "thorough investigation" of the case and to "severely sanction" the "illegal, improper and vandalistic" actions.


RelatedTRT World - China clashes with Trump over Panama canal port deal


Vital for US, China

The US and China are the main users of the 80-kilometre canal, which sees the passage of five percent of global maritime trade.

The Panama Canal was under US control from 1914 to 1999, when it was taken over by Panama.

Trump has demanded preferential conditions for its use by US vessels.

Hong Kong-based Hutchison Holdings operates two ports on the Pacific and the Atlantic, but has agreed to sell them to US-based BlackRock.
RelatedTRT World - Panama pulls out of China's Belt and Road Initiative: President Mulino

SOURCE:AFP
Reclaiming LGBTQI+ Rights in Africa

December 29, 2025
author: Thapelo Moeketsi



A 2025 report by the European Parliamentary Research Service revealed that 31 countries in Africa still criminalize same-sex relationships. In September 2025, the number rose to 32, as Burkina Faso criminalized homosexuality. The hostility that the LGBTQI+ community in Africa faces stems from cultural and legal biases. Identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or other queer identity (LGBTQI+) is illegal in most parts of the continent. Laws prohibiting same-sex relationships largely date back to the colonial era and continue to endanger the LGBTQI+ community. To end the hostility, African countries must repeal colonial-era laws and foster inclusion for the LGBTQI+ community. Local communities must confront harmful beliefs influencing homophobia and support survivors of LGBTQI-related violence.

Repealing colonial-era laws in Africa is necessary for progress and prosperity. A 2022 study by Ayodele Sogunro found that homophobia is not indigenous to Africa. Colonial authorities introduced and enforced homophobia through legal systems aimed at dividing and controlling Africans. Repealing these laws would be an opportunity for African countries to replace inherited oppression with African values of justice, community, and shared humanity. This will further recognise and restore the dignity of people identifying as LGBTQI+. It is with dignity that people can thrive and reach their potential, and contribute to the development of their communities and countries.

The progress realized in a few African countries offers hope for the continent. Angola, Mozambique, and Botswana have already repealed anti-LGBTQI+ laws. However, Ghana and Mali are moving in the opposite direction and proposing harsher measures. These countries and other African countries still hostile toward the LGBTQI+ community should follow the examples of Angola, Mozambique, and Botswana. They must realize that being outside the heterosexual norm is completely natural and normal. Laws and policies should not exclude people and make them feel uncomfortable because of their gender identity and sexual orientation. Rather, they should acknowledge ‌LGBTQI+ identities and allow individuals to express their sexual orientations freely.


…homophobia is not indigenous to Africa. Colonial authorities introduced and enforced homophobia through legal systems aimed at dividing and controlling Africans.

Education is critical to reshaping the views of Africans about LGBTQI+ and same-sex relationships. Schools should encourage empathy, diversity, and inclusion for the LGBTQI+ community. As the Nigerian writer, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, said, “The problem with stereotypes is not that they are untrue, but that they are incomplete. They make one story become the only story.” Adichie’s statement reflects how society reduces LGBTQI+ to a single harmful narrative, overlooking their full humanity and diverse experiences. This stereotypical narrative also fuels misunderstanding and hostility towards the LGBTQI+ community. Inclusive education fosters empathy, understanding, and an accepting society.

Broadening perspectives within and beyond the classroom is necessary. Schools should introduce critical discourses that challenge stereotypes about LGBTQI+. Schools should also be supportive spaces for LGBTQI+ students to express themselves freely and be vocal about their stories and experiences without the risk of exclusion or the influence of misinformation and bias. Educators can influence the acceptance or rejection of the LGBTQI+ community. They should encourage respect for LGBTQI+ identities, creating a safe environment for the community. Beyond the classroom, scholarship and research should encourage inclusive discourse and discourage anti-LGBTQI+ ideologies.

Victims and survivors of LGBTQI-related violence need support. LGBTQI+ individuals often face unjust arrests, forced anal examinations, and ‌so-called corrective rape. Victims of these acts deserve justice, protection, and healing. Governments must implement policies that prohibit such practices and instead hold perpetrators accountable. Justice must be unbiased, with a commitment toward protecting individual dignity regardless of an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity.


Africans should embrace the Ubuntu concept, which encourages seeing one another as a community, not reducing individuals’ identities to whom they choose to love or be intimate with.

Support services—legal and psychosocial—should be readily available to the survivors of these inhumane acts. Private hospitals and healthcare providers can support LGBTQI+ survivors by offering safe, confidential, and inclusive medical care. Collaborating with LGBTQI+ advocacy organizations can also enhance staff training and improve the quality of care for these survivors. Such collaborations can also help establish clear referral pathways, ensuring survivors receive comprehensive support that addresses their medical, legal, and emotional needs.

Change must begin at the community level. African communities must embrace their values of shared humanity and compassion to support and protect everyone equally. Perpetrators of harmful practices often seek justification in cultural or religious traditions. These traditions should not justify discrimination. The values of respect, care, and togetherness enrich African traditions. These values prevail, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. By reviving these inclusive values through community dialogue and reorientation, societies can challenge stigma and foster safer environments for the LGBTQI+ community.

Traditional and religious leaders must help build inclusive communities. They can become powerful voices for acceptance and understanding. Addressing homophobia does not require adopting foreign ideologies. It should involve restoring the ideals of African societies that once valued harmony, inclusion, and mutual respect. Africans should embrace the Ubuntu concept, which encourages seeing one another as a community, not reducing individuals’ identities to whom they choose to love or be intimate with.

Africa’s rejection of LGBTQI+ people builds on colonial laws, fear of losing traditional or religious control, and misconceptions. Africa must restore justice and compassion and build a continent where everyone lives openly and safely.

Thapelo Moeketsi is a writing fellow at African Liberty. He is on X @Wil_Moeketsi.

Article was first published by Mamba Online.

Photo by Sophie Popplewell on Unsplash.
Nepal’s rapper-turned mayor enters PM race, shaking up March elections

Kathmandu Mayor Balendra Shah has joined forces with the Rastriya Swatantra Party in a bid to challenge Nepal’s traditional political power


Balendra Shah, 35, a former rapper and composer, attends Indra Jatra festival at Kathmandu Durbar Square in Kathmandu, Nepal, September 6, 2025. / Reuters

Two popular leaders have formed an alliance ahead of March parliamentary elections in Nepal that will challenge the older parties, which have dominated the Himalayan nation's politics for over three decades, party officials and analysts said on Monday.

Rapper turned Kathmandu mayor Balendra Shah, known as Balen, a popular elected official, joined the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) or national independent party, led by a former TV host-turned politician Rabi Lamichhane on Sunday, party officials said.

They said under the agreement with RSP, 35-year-old Balen will become the prime minister if the RSP wins the March 5 elections, while Lamichhane will remain the party chief.

Both have vowed to address the demands raised during the Gen Z or youth-led protests against widespread corruption in September, in which 77 people were killed leading to Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigning.


RelatedTRT World - Will Nepal's political upheaval shift the balance of power in South Asia?


“It is a very smart and strategic move by the RSP to bring in Balen and his young supporters into its fold,” analyst Bipin Adhikari said.

“Traditional political parties are in pain for fear of losing their young voters to RSP,” he said.

The election commission says nearly 19 million of Nepal’s 30 million people are eligible to vote in the elections. Nearly one million voters – mostly youths – were added after the protests.

Balen was in the spotlight after the protests and was an undeclared leader of the youngsters who led the September protests.

He also helped form the interim government of former Chief Justice Sushila Karki to oversee the vote.

Oli’s Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) or UML and the centrist Nepali Congress party have shared power between them for most of the past three decades and are most likely to be challenged by Balen.


Nepal's former rapper to run for PM in key vote after Gen Z protests

PUBLISHED ON
December 28, 2025 

KATHMANDU — Two popular leaders have formed an alliance ahead of March parliamentary elections in Nepal that will challenge the older parties which have dominated the Himalayan nation's politics for over three decades, party officials and analysts said on Monday (Dec 29).

Rapper turned-Kathmandu mayor Balendra Shah, known as Balen, a popular elected official, joined the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) or national independent party, led by a former TV host-turned politician Rabi Lamichhane on Sunday, party officials said.

They said under the agreement with RSP, 35-year old Balen will become the prime minister if the RSP wins the March 5 elections while Lamichhane will remain the party chief.


Both have vowed to address the demands raised during the "Gen Z" or youth-led protests against widespread corruption in September in which 77 people were killed and led to Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli resigning.

"It is a very smart and strategic move by the RSP to bring in Balen and his young supporters into its fold," analyst Bipin Adhikari said.

"Traditional political parties are in pain for fear of losing their young voters to RSP," he said.

The election commission says nearly 19 million of Nepal's 30 million people are eligible to vote in the elections. Nearly one million voters — mostly youths — were added after the protests.

Balen was in the spotlight after the protests and was an undeclared leader of the youngsters who led the September protests.

He also helped form the interim government of former Chief Justice Sushila Karki to oversee the vote.

Oli's Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) or UML and the centrist Nepali Congress party have shared power between them for most of the past three decades and are most likely to be challenged by Balen.


Read Also

Nepal says economy suffered $756m hit from Gen Z protests



Source: Reuters

 

Senegal: Where women’s bodies belong to everyone but themselves


Women’s protest against rape in Senegal in 2021. Screenshot from the video ‘Rape Cases in Senegal’ on the Le Dakarois 221 YouTube channel.

By Bowel Diop

In Senegal, women who are victims of rape can be condemned for trying to take control of their lives by having an abortion.

Like many other African countries, Senegal ratified the Maputo Protocol on December 27, 2004, an African Union treaty that promotes and protects the rights of women and girls across Africa. According to the provisions of Article 14, signatory states must:

Authorize medical abortion in cases of sexual assault, rape, incest, and where carrying the pregnancy to term endangers the mental and physical health of the mother or the life of the mother and fetus.

However, in Senegal, this right largely remains mere words. Human rights organizations, such as the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), the Senegalese League of Human Rights (LSDH), and the African Assembly for the Defence of Human Rights (RADDHO), a national NGO based in the Senegalese capital Dakar, denounce the State’s non-compliance with its international commitments. In 2024, these three organizations published their Dual Hardship report, warning that Article 14 of the Maputo Protocol has not been transposed into national legislation, and that women victims of rape or incest must consequently carry their pregnancy to term.

In Senegal, Article 305 of the Criminal Code prohibits abortion, except under limited therapeutic circumstances intended to save a mother’s life. This situation drives many women, including the victims of rape or incest, towards illegal, dangerous, and often life-threatening practices.

According to Prison-Insider, a France-based platform that shares information on prisons across the world, up to 46 percent of the women held in LibertĆ© VI prison in Senegal are convicted of infanticide, demonstrating the scale of the problem.

While the right to abortion is barely recognized, the reasons are not only legal, but also socio-cultural.

Religious argument

The religious argument is the most often used to justify the prohibition of abortion.  Although 95 percent of the Senegalese population is Muslim, the country is a secular republic. Article 1 of its constitution stipulates:

The Republic of Senegal is secular, democratic, and social. It ensures that all citizens are equal before the law, regardless of origin, race, gender, or religion. It respects all beliefs.

Under a secular state, the debate should stay within the medical and legal fields. It is worth noting that according to some Muslim traditions, the soul is breathed into the fetus 120 days after the embryo’s development, meaning that terminating a pregnancy before this date does not constitute ending a life.

In any case, all women have the right to make decisions about their bodies without any collective religious constraints. Should the argument that an unborn child has no say in the matter take away the rights of women whose consent was not requested?

Why sacrifice the lives of an already wounded conscious being for a potential life? This argument doesn’t hold up when looking at women’s mental health, physical health, or dignity. The right to bodily autonomy must take precedence. Asking a victim of rape or ’incest to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term for the sake of “societal values” is hypocritical, harsh, and deeply unjust.

Protecting moral standards

The other argument used against the right to abortion is that of tradition. What “moral standards” are we trying to protect? If “morals” mean controlling women’s bodies, then these morals are outdated. The “moral standards” we should protect are women’s dignity and freedom, not patriarchal conservatism.

The real issue is patriarchy, which continues to dictate what women should do with their bodies. The power of this ideology is such that some women, including educated women, defend it, proving to what extent patriarchal norms are internalized, even by those who should dismantle them.

In Africa, the arguments against abortion are strikingly similar and directly associated with three main areas: religion, traditions, and African values.” They revolve around the prohibition of killing found in three monotheistic religions, around the idea that abortion is an imported practice, foreign to local culture, which threatens the traditional moral values that consider motherhood a blessing. Another common argument is that an innocent, defenceless fetus should not pay for the circumstances of the pregnancy.

However, these arguments are primarily based on emotions, taboos, or a form of conservatism, and rarely on science, fundamental rights, or the reality of sexual violence. In Senegal, JGEN, an NGO committed to combating gender-based violence, has stepped up its calls for the law to stop criminalizing the victims of rape and incest, thus complying with the Maputo Protocol. 

As a woman, I support the unconditional right to abortion. All women should be able to freely decide what is best for their bodies, their lives, their health, and their future, especially in cases of rape or incest. Choice should be a right and not a luxury.

 

We could all easily be ‘Aco’: Slovenia’s controversial new law seeks to address the challenge of Roma integration

Novo Mesto, Slovenia. Image by Andrej via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 4.0.

In early October, Slovenians were stunned by the vicious murder of 48-year-old AleÅ” Å utar, a pub owner in the southeastern city of Novo Mesto who was more popularly known by his nickname, Aco. The killing took place outside the LokalPatriot nightclub after Å utar received a message from his son who said he was being threatened by a group of men. After he arrived on the scene, a group of men attacked Å utar, who was left with serious head trauma and ultimately succumbed to his injuries in hospital.

Initially the police arrested 21-year-old Sabrijan Jurkovič who is part of the Roma community in Novo Mesto. He was already known to the police for crimes he committed as a minor, including property offences and the sexual assault of a person younger than 15. However, he was released on December 12 because of a lack of evidence. The police have since arrested his 20-year-old cousin, Samire Å iljić, based on the testimony of six witnesses. Å iljić is alleged to have dealt the fatal blow to Å utar, while he was on weekend release from the Radeče Correctional Home, a facility for young offenders.

The case is primarily relying on eyewitness testimony because there is no CCTV coverage of the murder. Should the suspect be convicted of murder, current Slovenian law states he could serve a jail term of between five and 15 years.

Following Å utar’s untimely death, Slovenia’s Justice Minister Andrea Katic and Interior Minister Bostjan Poklukar resigned and stated in separate letters that they want to “contribute to the calming of the situation”, with both “assuming objective responsibility.” Their resignations were not solely related to the murder, but also to broad systemic failures regarding the integration of the Roma peoples into Slovenian society. Prime Minister Robert Golob, who leads the center-left Freedom Party, rushed to quell dissent by expressing concern the murder could be used to stoke ethnic hatred against the Romani people: “There must be no room for exploiting the tragedy with the aim of creating division or calling for a reckoning.”

Slovenia has been grappling with its inability to integrate part of the Roma community, as well as smaller portions of other minority groups. Tolerance across the nation has weakened, with a survey last year finding as much as 55 percent of respondents saying they wouldn’t like to have Roma as their neighbors, although a majority thought that Slovene attitudes toward the ethnic group were neither tolerant nor intolerant.

The European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance, meanwhile, noted in its 2025 report that incidents of hate speech are both prevalent and underreported due to a lack of trust in public institutions. In Slovenia, hate speech is only considered criminal if it “can jeopardize and disturb public law and order.”

Following protests over the murder, Slovenia’s government introduced the Measures to Ensure Public Safety Bill, also known as the Å utar Law, which would — among other measures — give police additional powers to enter neighborhoods or homes that are deemed security risks without a court order, and freeze social assistance for those who commit crimes. Golob said the law is about protecting victims and children and changing the categorization of petty crimes to misdemeanors so as to “eliminate the feeling of inviolability and impunity” that repeat offenders in southeastern Slovenia have.

In mid-November, parliament unanimously passed the law. The European Commission, which opposes all forms of discrimination including “anti-Gypsyism,” reacted by urging Slovenia to ensure the law’s enforcement doesn’t “disproportionately affect any community.”

A tale of two communities

Romani peoples living in Western Europe have broadly struggled with integration, with many community members involved in petty theft or other crimes. While large numbers of Roma are estimated to have criminal records, poverty and employment discrimination are some of the contributing factors behind these figures.

In Slovenia, the community is noticeably split between those who reside in the country’s southeastern part, such as in Dolenjska, Bela Krajina and Posavje, and have low rates of integration, school completion, language, and employment, and those known as Prekmurje Roma, who are situated in northeastern Slovenia. There, integration of Roma has made positive strides. In the town of Murska Sobota, for example, people regularly pay their taxes, citizens consciously improve themselves in line with their neighbors, and there is even a street named ‘Delavska Ulica’ (‘Workers’ Street’), because all Roma residents are employed.

In an interview with the daily newspaper Dnevnik a few weeks after Å utar’s death, the president of the forum of Roma Councillors, Darko RudaÅ”, commented on the collective punishment that occurs when a Romani person commits a crime, and why differences exist between the two communities: “In Prekmurje, the Roma were provided with the conditions and opportunities to develop…in the southeast, communities have been left on the street to so-called civil initiatives.” While advocating for the lifting of restrictions on municipalities to invest in informal settlements so that poverty and unemployment levels can be reduced, he did acknowledge that the employment opportunities provided to the Prekmurje group are based across the border in Austria.

Jernej Zupančič, who teaches at the University of Ljubljana, believes isolation of the community breeds crime problems, including those that spawn from a “breakdown in traditional Roma society.” Along with other academics, he agrees that poor leadership in Roma settlements helps worsen the situation and stresses that such problems are not limited to Romani citizens.

The majority of Slovenians learn about Romani people through media articles, which are typically skewed towards the cultivation of a negative image. The amplification of negative stories and the absence of positive ones, along with an atypical lifestyle, further deepen the “us versus them” divide.

In a Peace Institute report which looked into hate crimes in the country, Roma were found to be one of the most vulnerable groups; within the community, young girls faced increased rates of violence and discrimination. The team behind the report conducted interviews with various professionals, including a sociologist and counselor who deals with victim support and gender based violence, who confirmed that local social centers and schools are absolving themselves of responsibility when confronted with child marriage.

Legislative developments

On November 26, President Natasa signed off on the bill and it became law. Reaction was fierce and peppered with accusations that the law threatens “democratic reliability” and “treats identity as suspicion.”

Amnesty International condemned the measure as “draconian” and said the law could result in further marginalization of the Roma as it allows authorities to skirt the safeguards that are in place.

While stressing that the legislative developments are not reflective of problems within any ethnic group or community, the pace of the reforms reflect a desire to enact change after a murder committed by a Romani person.

The law’s implementation occurs at a precarious time for the Golob government, coming off the back of a defeat in the recent assisted dying referendum, and with spring elections looming large. Public opinion polls consistently show that the right-wing Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) may well be poised to take power.

Delivering justice and promoting integration

Facebook post made by the Police Directorate in Novo Mesto

Screenshot of a Facebook post by the Police Directorate in Novo Mesto subjected to sarcastic comments. Out of over 1900 reactions over 930 are “haha” smiley, with 830 “likes.” Fair use.

Social media commentary has lampooned what it considers to be a two-tiered justice approach to dealing with Roma who commit crimes. Comments on a Facebook post made by the Police Directorate in Novo Mesto mocked the claims police made about ensuring public safety: “[U]ntil [the] next election…then everything will be the old way” and “[S]upposedly you’ve strengthened radar controls, I can’t find a connection [between that] and the current security situation in the area.”

Some of the comments also demanded confiscation of [illegal] weapons from residents of Roma settlements. On November 9, N1 TV reported that police seized automatic rifles, several pistols and ammunition there.

Citizens have also decried the rhetoric encouraging integration and understanding as empty in nature, suggesting that it allows politicians to suppress real concerns within communities. This may be a reflection of the plan outlined in Slovenia’s National Roma Integration Strategy 2021-2030, which promotes helping communities develop multidisciplinary groups to address issues and implementing action plans for Roma communities.

To date, however, the efforts have not resulted in closer integration, with even Romani activists saying the social strategy has stalled. Earlier this year, legislation was amended to attempt to curb school absenteeism rates among children by substituting cash for child benefits in a move that was said to target Roma, despite the law applying to all Slovenian children.

To create positive change within Roma groups, advocacy has encouraged supporting those who complete a certain level of education to take on meaningful roles and be given opportunities to succeed. The misunderstanding of why the enforcement of criminal behavior that results from ghettoization does not produce less crime has yet to be probed. Throwing money at the problem without strategic goals in mind leaves unresolved issues and fails to bridge trust gaps between societies with isolated ethnic factions.