Friday, April 03, 2026

 

Biochar reshapes ant societies, revealing hidden ecological trade-offs in soil restoration




Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University

Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors 

image: 

Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors

view more 

Credit: Sha Liu, Danling Xiong, Liang Zeng, Wei Du, Yang Liu, Christian E. W. Steinberg, Bo Pan, Shu Tao & Baoshan Xing





A new study shows that biochar, widely promoted as a climate-smart soil amendment, can significantly reshape the social lives of ants, with cascading effects on ecosystem functioning. The findings highlight both the promise and the risks of using biochar in large-scale land restoration.

Soil ecosystems depend not only on chemistry and microbes, but also on animals that engineer the environment. Ants, in particular, play a central role in soil aeration, nutrient cycling, and community regulation. Yet until now, little was known about how biochar affects their behavior and ecological functions.

“Our results show that biochar does not simply improve soil conditions. It also changes how soil animals behave and interact, which can amplify or undermine ecosystem recovery,” said the study’s lead author.

The research, based on controlled experiments with the ant species Formica japonica, tested four biochar application rates ranging from 0 to 10 %. The results reveal a clear dose-dependent pattern.

At moderate levels, biochar significantly enhanced multiple aspects of ant performance. Ants exposed to 2.5 to 5 % biochar showed a 73.4 % increase in nest site selection specificity, a 2.8-fold increase in nest complexity, and a doubling of foraging efficiency. Social recognition accuracy also improved by 3.5 times, indicating stronger colony cohesion.

These behavioral changes translated into stronger ecological functions. More complex nests improved soil structure and aeration, while faster and more efficient foraging likely enhanced nutrient redistribution. Increased cooperation and territorial defense suggested more stable and resilient colonies.

The researchers link these improvements to moderate shifts in soil properties. Biochar slightly increased soil pH and organic matter, creating conditions that made excavation easier and improved sensory signaling among ants.

However, the benefits did not continue at higher doses.

At 10 % biochar, ant survival dropped sharply to around 55 to 60 % over ten days. Behavioral performance also declined. Foraging slowed dramatically, nest construction weakened, and social interactions became less effective.

The study points to two key stressors behind these negative effects. First, high biochar concentrations increased soil alkalinity beyond the optimal range for ants. Second, they introduced environmentally persistent free radicals, which are known to induce oxidative stress and neurotoxicity in soil organisms.

“These findings suggest a classic hormetic response, where low doses stimulate biological activity but high doses become harmful,” the authors explained.

Importantly, the research highlights that soil restoration strategies must consider biological complexity, not just chemical improvements. Ants and other soil fauna act as ecosystem engineers, and their behavior can determine whether soil interventions succeed or fail.

The study also raises broader ecological questions. Changes in ant aggression, cooperation, and recognition could alter species interactions, pest control, and biodiversity patterns in treated soils.

“Biochar has great potential, but its application must be carefully optimized. Too much can disrupt the very biological systems we aim to restore,” the authors noted.

As global efforts intensify to combat soil degradation and climate change, the findings provide a timely reminder. Sustainable solutions must balance physical, chemical, and biological dimensions of ecosystems.

This research offers a new perspective by linking soil amendments to animal behavior and ecosystem function, opening the door to more biologically informed approaches to land management.

 

===

Journal Reference: Liu, S., Xiong, D., Zeng, L. et al. Biochar application enhances ant (Formica japonica) ecological functions as indicated by their social behaviors. Biochar 8, 77 (2026).   

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00594-z  

=== 

About Biochar

Biochar (e-ISSN: 2524-7867) is the first journal dedicated exclusively to biochar research, spanning agronomy, environmental science, and materials science. It publishes original studies on biochar production, processing, and applications—such as bioenergy, environmental remediation, soil enhancement, climate mitigation, water treatment, and sustainability analysis. The journal serves as an innovative and professional platform for global researchers to share advances in this rapidly expanding field. 

Follow us on FacebookX, and Bluesky.  

 

Wildfires accelerate winter snowmelt in Oregon's western Cascades, PSU study finds



Portland State University



The Pacific Northwest has seen below-normal snow this season — and new research from Portland State University suggests that the region's snowmelt-dependent water resources could face growing challenges in the years ahead as forest fires and winter rainstorms become more frequent.

Researchers in PSU's Snow Hydrology Lab, led by Kelly Gleason, an associate professor of eco-hydro-climatology in the School of Earth, Environment & Society, found that snow in burned areas of Oregon's western Cascades melted much faster during midwinter rain-on-snow events than snow in nearby unburned areas. 

Rain-on-snow events — when warm rain falls on an existing snowpack — can trigger rapid melting and increase flood risk downstream in just a matter of days. In the Pacific Northwest, that matters because mountain snow acts as critical seasonal water storage, refilling reservoirs, refreshing municipal and irrigation water supplies, producing hydroelectric power and providing habitat during the drier summer months. The new study shows that wildfire damage can intensify those impacts, reducing how long snow can hold onto water.

Wildfires open forest canopies, allowing more sunlight to reach the snow, while burned debris on the snow surface makes the snow absorb more and reflect less of that light. Together, those changes reduce the snowpack’s “cold content” — the built-in buffer that allows snow to warm up without immediately melting.

Sage Ebel, the study's lead author and a doctoral student in PSU's Earth, Environment & Society program, compares that cold content to a sponge.

"If a sponge has a lot of space, it can absorb water before anything drains out," Ebel said. "But if it's already saturated, water runs out right away. A snowpack with a lot of cold content can absorb heat before it starts melting. What we're finding is that small changes in short- and long-wave radiation in the burned sites are keeping that cold content lower than in unburned areas, making them vulnerable to snowmelt during rain-on-snow events."

Ebel and Gleason installed snow monitoring stations across high, mid and low elevations in the Breitenbush River watershed, 80% of which burned during the 2020 Lionshead fire. In 2023 and 2024, burned sites lost roughly twice as much snow during these rain-on-snow events as nearby unburned areas. Snowpacks at mid-elevations were most vulnerable, with rain-on-snow-driven melt accounting for 26% more of the total annual melt in burned forests.

"The impacts of climate change are exacerbated in the burned forest," Ebel said. "There's less capacity to absorb small changes in warming or inputs from rain than in unburned areas. As the area of burned forests increases with climate change, those effects could have widespread consequences for the water reserves we rely on across the West."

Faster winter melt from burned areas adds new stress to those systems, forcing water managers to balance flood preparedness with long-term water storage in a warming climate.

The researchers say understanding how wildfires and rain-on-snow events interact is essential for refining snowmelt models, improving flood forecasting and planning for more reliable water supplies in the future.

The study was published in the journal Environmental Research Communications. The findings are one example of the kind of applied, place-based research underway in PSU's School of Earth, Environment & Society, which launched this fall uniting multiple departments to encourage collaboration on complex, interconnected issues such as climate change.

 

Physical and social environmental exposures shape the biological brain age in global populations



The latest findings from the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) at Trinity College Dublin identify important brain health implications for prevention, public health, and policy.





Trinity College Dublin



Physical and social environmental exposures shape the biological brain age in global populations

The latest findings from the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) at Trinity College Dublin identify important brain health implications for prevention, public health, and policy. 

An international study published across 34 countries shows that the biological age of the brain can be accelerated or delayed by environmental risk (air pollution, public housing conditions) and protective factors (socioeconomic equality, access to healthcare). The stronger effects arise from interactions among environmental, social, and political conditions. The paper is published today [Friday, 3rd April 2026] in the journal Nature Medicine.

How do the combined environments in which people live jointly shape the pace at which the human brain ages? Using data from 18,701 individuals across 34 countries, the study shows that the exposome (the cumulative set of environmental, social, and sociopolitical exposures that individuals experience throughout life) operates in a syndemic manner - when two or more health problems occur together and interact in a way that makes each other worse - with multiple co-occurring exposures having very large effects, shaping brain aging across both healthy individuals and those with neurodegenerative conditions.

The researchers quantified 73 different environmental factors measured at country level indicators spanning air pollution, climate variability, green space, water quality, socioeconomic inequality, and multiple indicators of political and democratic contexts. When modeled jointly, these factors explained up to 15 times more variance in brain aging than any single exposure alone. This finding highlights a key shift: environmental influences on brain health are cumulative and nonlinear, with interactions across domains amplifying their biological impact.

Agustín Ibáñez, lead investigator and corresponding author said: “we aimed to test whether the combined, syndemic effects of environmental exposures better explain variability in brain aging across populations than individual exposures or single clinical diagnoses”.

The study identifies distinct but complementary brain markers. Combined physical exposures (increased pollution, extreme temperatures and lack of green spaces) were primarily associated with structural brain aging, particularly affecting regions, central to memory, emotional regulation, and autonomic functions. These structural changes are consistent with mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction, all of which may contribute to tissue degeneration. 

In contrast, social exposomes like poverty, inequality, and lack of support can strongly affect how the brain ages. These pressures are linked to faster aging in brain areas responsible for thinking, emotions, and social behaviour.

This may happen because the brain is constantly adapting to long-term stress. In fact, these combined social challenges can have an even bigger impact on brain aging than diseases like dementia and cognitive impairment. Overall, this effect is consistent across different brain measures, clinical groups, and long-term assessments.

For Agustina Legaz, first author of the study, Atlantic Fellow at GBHI and researcher at San Andres University, the work: “provides a quantitative framework to understand how multiple environmental exposures jointly shape brain aging beyond individual determinants”

Sebastián Moguilner, co-first author, Atlantic Fellow, and researcher at Harvard University, added that: “combining multimodal brain imaging with nonlinear modeling allows us to identify complex factors linking large-scale environmental exposures to brain connectivity”. 

Hernán Hernández, co-lead author of the study and researcher at the Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), emphasized that: “the inclusion of multiple countries and clinical groups highlights the global diversity of syndemic effects on brain health.”

 

What are the implications and possibilities for change because of these findings?

The findings have important implications for prevention, public health, and policy. Current strategies to promote healthy brain aging often focus on individual behaviors (diet, exercise, or cognitive training) or on treating disease once symptoms emerge. While these approaches are critically important, they address only part of the risk landscape. Many drivers of brain aging operate at broader structural levels, including environmental conditions, social inequalities, and institutional stability. 

Policies that reduce air pollution, expand access to urban green spaces, improve water quality, and strengthen social protection systems may therefore have measurable benefits for brain health at the population level. 

Promoting brain health requires coordinated, multisectoral action that goes beyond healthcare systems aloneEffective strategies should integrate:

-environmental regulation (reducing black carbon emissions and improving urban design), 

-social policy (ensuring basic welfare and improving education and access to resources), and 

-institutional strengthening (supporting democracy by enhancing civic participation and expanding local representation). 

These results call for aligning efforts across public health, environmental, urban, and policy sectors to reduce cumulative exposome burden and support healthier brain aging trajectories at both individual and population levels.

Read the full article: The paper: ‘The exposome of brain ageing across 35 countries’ can be read in full at Nature Medicine at the following link:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04302-z which is available when the embargo lifts on Friday, 3rd April 2026 at 10am (BST). You can request a copy of the study on request before the embargo lifts.

Ends