Sunday, May 31, 2026

 

Rovers, regolith, robots: The blueprint for the moon



In an environment of radiation, extreme temperatures and razor-sharp dust, researchers are designing how humans will build, and ultimately survive, on the moon




Texas A&M University

Photo of Dr. Patrick Suermann 

image: 

Dr. Patrick Suermann

Professor of construction science

Texas A&M University College of Architecture

view more 

Credit: Texas A&M University College of Architecture





The “soil” blanketing the moon’s surface isn’t actually soil.

It’s a fine, lethal, abrasive powder of shattered rock and jagged glass that shreds gaskets, chews through seals and hangs in an airless environment blasted by unfiltered radiation and temperature swings that can warp steel.

Scientists call it lunar regolith.

To engineers and the space community, lunar regolith is one of the most hostile construction materials in the human story.

To researchers at Texas A&M University, it’s the raw material for humanity’s next frontier of a permanent lunar settlement.

With NASA’s unveiling of its new Lunar Innovation Park — a base designed to support human presence and operations in the lunar environment — Texas A&M is emerging as a key player in the agency’s most urgent challenge: how to do construction on the moon.

“We are moving past the era of ‘flags and footprints,’” said Dr. Patrick Suermann, professor of construction science at the College of Architecture and retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel. “We have to stop thinking like explorers and start thinking like settlers. That means building with what’s underneath our boots.”

Suermann recently presented his vision and work at the 2026 Earth & Space conference, hosted at the Texas A&M Hotel and Conference Center.

The million-dollar problem

To build a civilization, humans can’t be space tourists carrying their own luggage; future settlers will have to use the resources already on the moon.

“It costs roughly $1 million to $1.3 million per kilogram to ship materials to the moon,” Suermann said.

The economics become even more staggering when scaled.

A 2018 report on lunar architecture estimated that transporting rocket propellant from Earth to the moon costs roughly $10,000 per kilogram. But, if that same fuel was produced on the moon, the estimated cost plummets to just $500, almost 20 times cheaper.

“The high cost of shipping to the moon is the million-dollar problem,” Suermann said. “Every time you can cut the mass of a payload, you save a fortune. That’s why the future depends on building infrastructure from resources already on the moon.”

The command center for the space race

The idea of building on the moon using its own resources sits at the center of a growing collaboration between Texas A&M, private industry and government agency partners.

Helping spearhead this effort is the Texas A&M Space Institute led by Dr. Robert Ambrose, professor of mechanical engineering at the College of Engineering.

Backed by a historic $200 million investment from the Texas Legislature and situated next door to the Johnson Space Center in Houston, the institute is designed to be the nation’s premier hub for off-world research, robotics and testing.

“One of the most exciting features of the 240-acre facility is it’s two-and-a-half acre testing areas: one replicating the surface of the moon, the other Mars,” Suermann said.

The institute simulates the brutal realities of extraterrestrial construction, while ushering in a new generation of robotics, autonomous systems and space rovers through a direct pipeline from the Robotics and Automation Design (RAD) Lab.

But the Texas A&M Space Institute is more than a research campus, it’s a hub of innovation.

“It isn’t just a facility,” Suermann said. “It’s a place to get young investigators and the next generation of researchers excited and prepared to tackle the biggest challenges in space exploration.”

The lunar foreman

While the institute provides the landscape, the Construction Automation, Safety and Education (CASE) Lab led by Dr. Gilles Albeaino, assistant professor of construction science at the College of Architecture, focuses on the industrial “brain” of future lunar construction.

Here, researchers are pioneering the use of mixed reality, or how humans and machines will work together as partners, rather than simple remote-controlled tools.

Future lunar construction sites may look like scenes from a science fiction movie: rovers hauling regolith across the moon’s surface, robotic arms printing walls layer by layer, and engineers on Earth overseeing operations through VR headsets.

“On the moon, construction operations will depend on semi-autonomous robotic systems,” Suermann said. “The CASE lab is leading research into how humans and machines can work together in environments where humans can’t safely do everything themselves.”

That challenge is magnified on the moon. There is no natural shielding from radiation, temperatures swing violently between lunar night and day, dust can permeate equipment, and even simple repairs become high-risk operations.

“Every tool matters. Every ounce of material you ship matters,” Suermann said. “So, the question becomes: how do you use the environment itself as your supply chain, and how can you augment machines to become your partner in austere environments?”

From the Arctic to Afghanistan

For Suermann, the lessons shaping lunar construction don’t just stem from his academic endeavors in modeling and designing informatics and building sciences. They also come from two decades spent serving in some of Earth’s harshest environments.

Before joining Texas A&M in 2017, Suermann served in the U.S. Air Force, deploying to isolated regions like Guam and Greenland.

His mission? Build sustainable infrastructure and bases that support military operations.

“My experiences in serving the U.S. Air Force were formative, and transformative,” Suermann said. “It taught me a great deal about construction, and that what can go wrong will go wrong.”

One deployment in Afghanistan left a particularly lasting impression. He led a joint military operation for the building of a runway and base in the middle of a desert no-man’s-land.

“The sand was this fine, talcum-like, powdered mesh,” Suermann said. “Hidden under it were these massive boulders.”

The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions.

“It shows, to me, that lunar regolith isn’t too dissimilar from the terrain we have here on Earth,” Suermann said. “At the end of the day, construction is construction.”

Today, Suermann is passing that expeditionary spirit to mission partners, academic collaborators and a new generation of Aggies.

In the halls of the College of Architecture, his expertise plays an interdisciplinary symphony across engineering, management and technology — conducting a scientific tune where theories meet impactful discoveries and applications.

“The beauty of construction folks is that we take the ideas that live in computer simulations and make them come to life,” Suermann said. “It’s not an assembly line; it’s ideas that we turn into universal applications. To lead the future, you have to know how things are done now.”

As NASA moves toward its 2040 goal for a permanent lunar base, the Aggie mission remains clear: not just to visit the moon, but to stay there. And they’re building that future one layer of lunar regolith at a time.  


Construction Logistics 

Scenes during Dr. Patrick Suermann’s deployment to Afghanistan with the U.S. Air Force, where he led the building of infrastructure and bases to support military operations. The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions

Construction Logistics 

Scenes during Dr. Patrick Suermann’s deployment to Afghanistan with the U.S. Air Force, where he led the building of infrastructure and bases to support military operations. The construction logistics were a nightmare. To Suermann, though, it was an exciting engineering expedition — a strangely familiar feeling to the challenges researchers now face in planning for lunar expeditions.

Geomorphology 

Researchers at Texas A&M are designing the blueprint for sustained human presence, and settlement, on the moon. Future lunar construction sites may look like scenes from a science fiction movie: rovers hauling regolith across the moon’s surface, robotic arms printing walls layer by layer, and engineers on Earth overseeing operations through VR headsets.

Credit

Dr. Patrick Suermann/Texas A&M University College of Architecture



 

Common protective soybean seed treatment may not increase profitability



Penn State





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Many soybean farmers use seeds treated with fungicides to ward off disease, but the profits from these increased yields might not offset the cost of the treatment in most cases, according to a study published in Scientific Reports by researchers at Penn State.

The researchers analyzed how seed treatments affect yield and profitability in soybean farms in the Midwest and found that yield gains were modest and often did not offset the added cost of the treatment. Additionally, financial benefit was likely only when seed treatment costs were low and soybean prices were high.

Paul Esker, professor of epidemiology and of field crop pathology in the College of Agricultural Sciences and lead author on the study, said the findings suggest that growers may want to carefully evaluate the use of fungicide seed treatments on their farms.

“Farmers often talk about putting money in their pockets, and our research suggests that this can occur by reducing input costs rather than by assuming an economic gain from using treated seeds,” said Esker, who is also affiliated with the Plant Institute in the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences. “Growers may want to use treated seeds only in specific, high-risk situations or after verifying a positive return-on-investment.”

The use of fungicide-treated seeds has risen sharply in the last few decades, the researchers said. While about 8% of soybean seeds were treated with fungicide in 1996, that figure rose to 60% to 75% by 2015.

Despite their popularity, Esker said their use may not result in higher profits for farmers. Additionally, he noted, unnecessary use of fungicides could result in potentially harmful effects on beneficial microbes in the seeds and soil.

“Adoption of seed treatments has continued to increase in U.S. soybean production systems, but uncertainty remains about whether their use is necessary,” Esker said. “Furthermore, given the parallel questions about the use of seed-treatment insecticides, we recognized that addressing them could go a long way toward helping farmers make better soybean management decisions.”

For the study, the researchers analyzed data from both randomized controlled trials and large-scale, on-farm observational studies previously conducted by other teams.

Data from RCTs was limited to studies in the U.S. Midwest that included crop data from both treated seeds and untreated control seeds. Observational data included self-reported information from growers across three growing seasons from 2014 to 2016 and 10 Midwest states.

“This approach moves us away from a purely correlative interpretation of the results and aligns more closely with the questions that farmers often ask us,” Esker said.

Analysis of data from randomized controlled trials found an average yield increase of 22.2 kilograms per hectare (kg/ha) — or about 19.81 pounds per acre — that could be attributed to fungicide seed treatments. Analysis of observational data found a similarly small average yield gain of approximately 36 kg/ha, or about or about 32.12 lbs/acre.

Additional simulations showed that these gains in crop yields often didn’t offset the costs of seed treatment.

“Our results add to a growing body of evidence that fungicide seed treatments do not provide consistent, reliable protection against downside yield loss risk,” Esker said. “They also will help us collaborate with farmers to determine under what conditions a fungicide seed treatment may be beneficial.”

The findings also raise concerns, the researchers said, about the widespread use of fungicide seed treatments on the microbiomes of seeds and their surrounding soil. Seeds and soils have unique compositions of microbes that benefit germination and seedling development, which could be disrupted by unnecessary fungicide use.

“Given the small economic benefits and these known ecological risks, policymakers may want to prioritize support for research and extension programs that help growers identify the specific conditions where seed treatments are likely to be profitable,” Esker said.

In the future, the researchers said the development of tools to assess specific fields’ pathogen risk may be a more sustainable and economical approach than the current widespread use of preventative fungicides.

Denis A. Shah, Kansas State University; Spyridon Mourtzinis, Tatiane Severo Silva and Shawn P. Conley, University of Wisconsin-Madison; and Patricio Grassini, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, also co-authored the study.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board, North Central Soybean Research Program, and the United Soybean Board helped support this research.

 

FAPESP seeks to boost scientific collaboration between São Paulo and the United Kingdom


The Foundation is promoting the FAPESP Week symposium in England for the third time, with the aim of consolidating and expanding partnerships in strategic areas such as energy transition and artificial intelligence



Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo





From June 2 to 4, the Science Museum in London will exhibit a sample of scientific production developed in the state of São Paulo and the United Kingdom in areas such as artificial intelligence, energy transition, and health. The century-old museum, founded in 1857, will host FAPESP Week London.

Organized in cooperation with the Science Museum, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), the Royal Society, the British Academy, and the UK Science and Technology Network (STN) in Brazil, with the support of the Brazilian Embassy in London, the event aims to consolidate and expand scientific partnerships in strategic areas of mutual interest between researchers from São Paulo and the UK.

This will be the third time that FAPESP will hold the symposium in England – with previous editions in 2013 and 2019 – reinforcing the role of the United Kingdom as the second main scientific partner of the state of São Paulo in terms of shared research production on the global stage, behind only the United States.

“Holding this third edition in the United Kingdom attests to the capacity for joint scientific production between the region and the state of São Paulo,” Raul Machado, manager of institutional relations at FAPESP, tells Agência FAPESP.

The academic sessions will bring together scientists from both countries to discuss advanced research results and identify new opportunities for joint funding. The debates are aligned with FAPESP’s strategic funding axes and will cover topics such as energy transition; health, health data, and precision medicine; artificial intelligence and data for society; biodiversity, bioeconomy and circular economy; sustainable use of resources; and museums, heritage, and society.

One of the main highlights of this edition is the inclusion of a debate on the relevance of science museums in disseminating knowledge, connecting the vocation of the British institution to the São Paulo experience. The program will include the participation of the Butantan Institute, which will take a joint exhibition project to England.

“Including museums was an intentional choice to give space to this type of dissemination. We’re bringing the Butantan, which is an institution associated with intense technological development activity,” explains Machado. In addition, artificial intelligence (AI) will act as a cross-cutting theme throughout the program. “AI is permeating everything from health to technological innovation; these are the keywords of the meeting.”

The Brazilian delegation will also follow a parallel agenda of visits to cutting-edge innovation environments in the British ecosystem, including the Data Science Institute – the data science and AI hub of the London School of Economics (LSE), Genomics England – a UK government company created in 2013 with the goal of integrating genomic medicine into the British public health system (NHS), and the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult – a non-profit center of excellence established by the British government with the mission of accelerating the development and manufacture of cell and gene therapies.

Five deep-tech companies (science and technology-based startups) supported by the Innovative Research in Small Businesses Program (PIPE) will participate in the event's discussion sessions, in their respective areas of expertise. These are: SleepUp, Inovia, Fubá Educação Ambiental, @Tech, and Ciclou.

Increased Collaboration

Now in its 27th edition, the FAPESP Week symposium series, organized since 2011, has created opportunities and facilitated cooperation, consolidating and expanding partnerships between researchers from the state of São Paulo and colleagues from around the world.

More than bringing researchers closer institutionally, the practical effect of FAPESP Weeks is evidenced by the significant growth in the volume of collaborative research after the meetings, emphasizes Machado.

After the event in Germany in March 2025, for example, the number of collaborative research proposals submitted to FAPESP jumped from 294 to 582, representing an increase of almost 98%. A similar scenario was observed in Spain, where an edition of the meeting was held in November 2024 and proposals increased from 283 to 471 (a rise of 66.4%), and in France, which hosted the event in June 2025 and recorded 51.3% growth, going from 374 to 566 submitted projects.

Even in smaller scientific communities, such as in Uruguay, where the event took place in November 2025, the symposium’s stimulus proved robust, causing submissions to jump from 18 to 51 proposals. These numbers consolidate FAPESP’s strategy of focusing on in-person forums to transform institutional dialogue into real and measurable scientific cooperation, Machado notes.

“International partners, in theory, are already regular collaborators. But when you hold an in-person and focused event of this size, attention turns entirely to cooperation, and that triggers a surge in the number of research proposals,” the manager explains.

The organizers expect FAPESP Week London to replicate this historic success, turning the three days of debates into a new wave of joint projects funded by FAPESP and its partners, thereby boosting the internationalization of science produced in the state of São Paulo.

 

Finding new ways to measure the local sustainability of rural tourism




Penn State





UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — Tourism affects local populations differently in counties across the U.S., but measuring these effects may now be easier thanks to a new tool developed as part of a study by researchers at Penn State and West Virginia University Extension.

For the study, published in the journal Tourism Economics, the researchers developed a sustainability index to assess how tourism affects counties according to a number of factors that measure the areas’ economic, social and environmental well-being. They found that counties relying heavily on tourism varied widely in their ability to keep it from overwhelming local resources, with no destination performing well on every dimension.

Critically, the researchers said, the index allowed them to measure counties’ sustainability as it changed over a period of 10 years instead of at one point in time.

Luyi Han, assistant professor in regional and agricultural economics in the College of Agricultural Sciences and lead author on the study, said the findings give new clues about how tourist areas can boost their well-being.

“Sustainability shouldn’t be treated as a branding exercise alone: investments in housing, public safety, environmental protection and community well-being may also strengthen a destination’s long-term economic resilience,” Han said. “More broadly, the findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all model of sustainable tourism. Local conditions matter, and effective strategies need to be tailored to the specific strengths and vulnerabilities of each community.”

Stephan Goetz, professor of agricultural and regional economics and co-author on the paper, added that as more rural communities seek to expand their local tourism and recreational sectors as a source of economic and community development, long run sustainability becomes more important.

“For example, local residents ideally will also benefit from tourist dollars, and any recreational activity should not come at the expense of the natural environment when that is what attracts tourists in the first place” said Goetz, who is also the director of the Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. “This indicator is designed to help address these concerns.”

The research was inspired by a growing tension in tourism-dependent communities, according to the team. While tourism can be an engine of economic growth, it can also create pressures on housing, community well-being and the environment.

“In the United States, these questions are especially important because there has been no consistent, longitudinal way to measure whether tourism development is actually sustainable across places and over time,” Han said. “Much of the existing work relies on local surveys or case studies, which can provide valuable insights but are costly, difficult to repeat and hard to compare across destinations.”

The researchers said they wanted to respond to that gap by asking whether tourism sustainability can be tracked in a more systematic, scalable and comparable way.

For the study, the researchers used existing data — such as the US Census data, environmental monitoring data, crime statistics and health measures — to build a novel composite sustainable tourism index.

The index uses six measures to represent the economic, social and environmental well-being of tourism counties: the percentage of income a household spends on housing, poverty rates, violent crime rates, life expectancy, the amount of pollution in the air and pollution sites.

After calculating the change in each measure between 2009 and 2019, the researchers found that on average, poverty rates fell and air quality improved over the study period, suggesting some positive economic and environmental gains.

At the same time, housing affordability remained a major concern and pollution increased in many places. Finally, a sharp rise in violent crime was found across many recreation-dependent counties.

Additionally, the researchers found strong geographic variation, with many higher-performing counties concentrated in the Mountain West, Pacific Northwest and Alaska, though even these places often faced significant affordability pressures.

Finally, the researchers also found patterns linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Counties with stronger sustainability performance before the pandemic tended to experience smaller employment losses in the tourism sector and stronger recovery afterward, suggesting that sustainability may also contribute to resilience during major shocks,” Han said.

The findings point to several potential policy implications, according to the researchers. For example, concerns about housing affordability could be addressed with interventions such as inclusionary zoning or tourism tax revenues dedicated to affordable housing development, while increases in violent crime may require safety strategies that address the unique challenges of tourism communities.

The researchers said that in addition to gaining insights about how tourism affects counties over time, the tool they developed can also be used to aid in decision-making.

“For destination managers and local governments, the index offers a way to establish a sustainability baseline, compare performance with similar destinations, and track change over time,” Han said. “It can help identify where tourism is creating uneven outcomes — for example, where economic gains may be accompanied by rising housing pressures or worsening social conditions — and support more targeted policy responses.”

In the future, additional studies could examine exactly how tourism impacts different dimensions of local communities — as well as why some towns achieve more balanced outcomes than others, the researchers said.

Daniel Eades and Doug Arbogast, both from West Virginia University, also co-authored this study.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture helped support this research.

 

Stopping ticks in their tracks


UT researchers discover protein that may block disease transmission


University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

UT College of Veterinary Medicine Professor professor Hameeda Sultana 

image: 

Research led by University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine Professor Hameeda Sultana and alumni postdoctoral fellow Waqas Ahmed has identified a tick protein that could help block disease transmission before it fully happens.

view more 

Credit: Photo by S. Bridges, courtesy the University of Tennessee.






Few creatures inspire as much universal dislike as ticks. Though small, these parasites have an enormous impact on human and animal health. Each year, ticks spread viruses and bacteria that infect people, livestock, wildlife and pets around the world. Scientists at the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine are working to better understand how ticks transmit these diseases—and how to stop them.

In a new study published in The EMBO Journal, researchers identified a tick protein that could help block disease transmission before it fully happens. The EMBO Journal, published by the European Molecular Biology Organization, is one of the world’s leading journals in molecular biology.

The research was led by professor Hameeda Sultana and alumni postdoctoral fellow Waqas Ahmed, and contributors included former graduate students Wenshuo Zhou and Kehinde Fasae, current graduate student Md Bayzid, and faculty collaborators professor Girish Neelakanta and former UT clinical assistant professor Denae LoBato. Supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health, the work highlights the UT Institute of Agriculture’s role in advancing research on vector-borne diseases.

Between 2018 and 2020, Sultana’s laboratory was the first to identify exosomes derived from tick saliva and salivary glands and from tick and mosquito cells. In this groundbreaking work, the UT research team discovered that ticks produce an exosomal glycine-rich protein that plays a vital role in helping ticks feed and transmit viruses. “Exosomes are tiny bubble-like vesicles with messages in them,” explains Sultana. “They are tiny membrane-bound particles that transport proteins and other biological signals between cells and tissues. “When a tick bites its host, the interaction is more complex than it may appear. Tick saliva contains exosomes filled with a sophisticated cocktail of molecules, allowing them to feed undetected while avoiding triggering the host’s immune defenses. These vesicles carry a variety of tick proteins that may help pathogens move between ticks and hosts. “They contain several arthropod proteins that could facilitate tick feeding, pathogen acquisition from infected hosts to naïve ticks, and transmission of pathogens from infected ticks to naïve hosts,” Sultana says.

When the researchers used genetic tools to silence the gene responsible for this protein, the effects were dramatic. Ticks lacking the protein struggled to feed effectively and showed reduced body weight after feeding. Even more importantly, virus levels were significantly lower. The findings build on years of work exploring how ticks use microscopic vesicles to interact with their hosts.

This protein could be used in a vaccine approach. Faculty collaborator Girish Neelakanta says discoveries like this highlight how understanding tick biology can reveal new opportunities to prevent disease transmission. “Ticks transmit several pathogens,” Neelakanta explains. “Studies like this provide evidence about tick molecules that play an important role not only in tick biology but also in the interactions with pathogens.”

Researchers believe exosomes could become an important target for disease prevention strategies. “Since the identification of exosomes from ticks from my laboratory, several studies—including our own—have emphasized the importance of these vesicles in tick feeding and interactions with pathogens,” Sultana says. “This is an exciting area of research that could open several avenues for the development of arthropod exosome-based strategies to target vector-borne diseases.”

According to Neelakanta, targeting these molecules may offer a new way to interrupt the transmission cycle. “Targeting this type of protein might be an ideal approach to affect transmission of several pathogens from ticks.” This type of approach is known as a transmission-blocking vaccine. Rather than targeting the virus itself, the vaccine targets a molecule in the tick, preventing the tick from successfully feeding or transmitting pathogens. By interrupting this process early, scientists hope to stop infections before they ever reach the host.

As tick-borne diseases continue to increase worldwide, the need for new prevention strategies is becoming more urgent. Current control methods rely on avoiding tick bites or reducing tick populations. However, researchers are increasingly investigating ways to interfere with the biological mechanisms that ticks rely on to feed and transmit disease.

The discovery of this exosomal protein adds to a growing body of research exploring how parasites communicate with their hosts at the microscopic level. Scientists are still in the early stages of understanding the role exosomes and other extracellular vesicles play in these complex interactions.

Findings like these demonstrate how fundamental molecular biology research can lead to practical advances in both animal and human health. By uncovering the hidden mechanisms ticks use to spread disease, scientists are opening the door to innovative new strategies for prevention.

Sometimes the best way to stop a parasite is to understand it at its smallest scale. In this case, the key to combatting ticks may lie within microscopic packages only billionths of a meter wide. One day, these tiny messengers could help prevent the spread of vector-borne diseases.

One of 33 veterinary colleges in the United States, the UT College of Veterinary Medicine educates students in the art and science of veterinary medicine and related biomedical sciences, promotes scientific research and enhances human and animal well-being.

The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture is comprised of the Herbert College of Agriculture, UT College of Veterinary Medicine, UT AgResearch and UT Extension. Through its land-grant mission of teaching, research and outreach, the Institute touches lives and provides Real. Life. Solutions. to Tennesseans and beyond. utia.tennessee.edu.