Showing posts sorted by date for query MICHAEL COREN. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query MICHAEL COREN. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Xi’s ‘blunt’ warning to Trump on Taiwan exposes profound risks: analysts


ByAFP
May 14, 2026


Chinese leader Xi Jinping issued an unusually blunt message to US President Donald Trump over Taiwan that exposes potential pitfalls in the relationship, analysts said - Copyright AFP Brendan Smialowski


Peter CATTERALL

Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s unusually “blunt” warning to US President Donald Trump over Taiwan at Thursday’s summit in Beijing exposes potentially grave pitfalls in the relationship, although its immediate impact could be limited, analysts say.

US sales of military equipment to the self-ruled island claimed by Beijing have long enraged the Chinese government, threatening to derail already-fraught engagement on trade and other issues between the world’s top two economies.

China has vowed to bring Taiwan under its control, by force if necessary, while the United States — which diplomatically recognises only Beijing — is required under domestic law to provide weapons to the democratic island so that it can defend itself.

Xi warned Trump on Thursday that “the Taiwan question is the most important issue” in their bilateral relationship, according to remarks published by Chinese state media soon after the talks began.

“If mishandled, the two nations could collide or even come into conflict, pushing the entire China-US relationship into a highly perilous situation,” he said.

Such “blunt” rhetoric is “out of the ordinary” coming from Xi in conversation with a US president, Adam Ni, editor of the China Neican newsletter, told AFP.

“Xi wants to make it very clear to Trump and to the public record that he thinks the Taiwan issue is the potential powder keg between the two superpowers,” Ni said.

Chong Ja Ian of the National University of Singapore said China “has been signalling a desire for US compromise on Taiwan in the lead-up to the summit”.

“Perhaps they see some opportunity to convince Trump,” Chong said.

“So far, the US side has not indicated any movement.”



– ‘No consensus yet’ –



Trump has not commented publicly on Taiwan since arriving in Beijing on Wednesday evening.

He ignored multiple questions on the subject from reporters during a visit to the Temple of Heaven on Thursday afternoon, where he and Xi posed for photographs after talks.

A readout of the meeting from a White House official also made no mention of Taiwan.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Trump would say more on Taiwan “in the coming days”, adding that the president “understands the sensitivities” about the island.

Trump said days before the trip that he would discuss US arms sales to Taiwan with Xi — something that would be a break with a decades-long policy of not consulting with Beijing on the issue.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also in Beijing and known for his firm line on China as a senator, suggested continuity in an interview with Fox News aboard Air Force One.

“It’s not in China’s interest or anyone’s interest for there to be any sort of forced change in the status quo. I think stability there is very important,” he said.

Tzeng Wei-feng of the National Chengchi University’s Institute of International Relations in Taipei told AFP that he thinks Xi and Trump “don’t have a consensus yet” on the issue of arms sales.

While a deal on that sensitive subject is unlikely, Tzeng said, it’s possible that Trump will make “some statement that weakens the United States’ promise on defending Taiwan”.



– ‘Non-negotiable’ –



Trump repeatedly touted his personal relationship with Xi in the run-up to the summit, praising him as “a Leader of extraordinary distinction” in a social media post on Tuesday.

Many observers say Trump is placing great stock in his ability to cash in on that rapport during the summit.

Casting a shadow over talks is the unresolved US-Israeli war with Iran, which previously delayed Trump’s visit to China — the top customer of Iranian oil.

Speculation has emerged that Trump would seek to use US arms sales to Taiwan as a bargaining chip to encourage Beijing to use its leverage with Tehran to accept a deal to end the war.

However, Ryan Hass, an expert on China and Taiwan at the Washington-based Brookings Institution, threw cold water on the proposition.

“Doing so would violate Beijing’s longstanding principle that Taiwan is ‘non-negotiable’. It isn’t how Beijing rolls,” he wrote on social media.

“More likely, both leaders will affirm their shared interest in stabilising relations and use (economic and) commercial deals to demonstrate progress.”

burs-pfc-ehl/dhw/pbt


Subdued Trump left waiting for ‘big hug’ from Xi


By AFP
May 14, 2026


President Donald Trump claimed before heading to China that Chinese leader Xi Jinping would give him a "big, fat hug", but appears to have been left waiting - Copyright POOL/AFP Brendan SMIALOWSKI


Danny KEMP

Donald Trump paid a visit to the Temple of Heaven in the Chinese capital on Thursday, but the US president had a face like thunder.

Standing stiff and unsmiling next to Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump appeared unmoved by the former imperial temple in Beijing where emperors once prayed for good harvests.

The 79-year-old American leader, who rarely misses a chance to talk to reporters, arrived in Beijing the night before after a lengthy 16-hour flight, and was uncharacteristically subdued as he was guided around the temple by Xi.

Asked by reporters including AFP how earlier talks with the Chinese leader had gone, a seemingly tired Trump replied: “Great.”

“Great place. Incredible. China’s beautiful,” he added.

But he ignored two questions on whether they had discussed Taiwan, after Xi warned that differences between the United States and China over the self-governing island claimed by Beijing could lead to conflict.

Trump had claimed before heading to China for the first time in nearly a decade that Xi would give him a “big, fat hug”.

But that did not happen.

The atmosphere had been less frosty when Trump arrived at the dominating Great Hall of the People for the talks.

The Chinese were careful to appeal to Trump’s love of pomp, greeting him with marching bands, soldiers in lockstep and a cannon salute that echoed through Tiananmen Square.

Trump beamed and applauded when hundreds of Chinese schoolchildren in brightly coloured outfits waved flags and flowers and chanted “welcome, welcome, warm welcome”.

The two leaders shook hands warmly, Trump patting Xi’s hand, and exchanged a few words on the red carpet before the cameras.

Trump — who has insisted that his personal relationship with Xi will win business deals — praised the Chinese president as a “great friend” and “great leader”.

– ‘Come into conflict’ –

But times have changed since he last visited Beijing in 2017, and he is now in a more assertive China — one that did not immediately call Trump a friend in return.

Behind the scenes, it appeared that Xi had set out an uncompromising stance on Taiwan, according to comments released by state media.

Trump had also come looking for China’s help to end the Iran war, and to extend a trade truce with Beijing, but there was no immediate sign of a breakthrough.

Instead, there was virtual silence from Trump, who refrained from commenting on his Truth Social platform that he normally posts on multiple times a day, and from the White House.

And as Xi warned that the world’s two largest economies could “come into conflict” if Washington mishandles the Taiwan issue, minor skirmishes broke out on the sidelines of their meeting.

At the Great Hall of the People, journalists from both sides jostled each other to get a place before the meeting as US and Chinese officials tried to keep order.

Then at the Temple of Heaven, US and Chinese officials held a tense discussion after local security blocked a US Secret Service agent accompanying travelling journalists from entering the complex with his weapon.

As temperatures in Beijing creeped to above 30C, Chinese officials refused to allow US reporters, including an AFP journalist, to leave a side room where they were being held and join Trump’s motorcade to his hotel.

Amid raised voices, White House officials and journalists eventually pushed past the Chinese officials to make it to their vans before the US president drove off without them.


Trump reportedly 'humiliated' after rival leader snubs president at airport: 'Rocky start'

Alexander Willis
May 13, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump arrives aboard Air Force One at Beijing Capital International Airport during his visit to the country, in Beijing, China, May 13, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci

President Donald Trump landed in Beijing, China Wednesday ahead of his high-stakes summit with President Xi Jinping, but critics soon noticed a key figure was absent during Trump’s arrival.

“Donald Trump has arrived in China to find that President Xi did NOT greet him at the airport,” reads a statement from the progressive advocacy platform Call To Activism, run by digital strategist and political influencer Joe Gallina.

“MAGA is in spin mode heralding the ‘red carpet treatment,’ but the visit is already at a rocky start. Instead of a presidential welcome, Trump was greeted by US Ambassador to China David Perdue; Xi’s vice president, Han Zheng; China’s Ambassador to Washington Xie Feng; and Executive Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ma Zhaoxu.”

Trump was, in fact, not greeted by Xi as he stepped off Air Force One Wednesday, and instead met by other Chinese officials. Trump’s own niece, Mary L. Trump, took notice of what she characterized as a snub as well.

“Xi couldn't be bothered to meet Donald at the airport because he understands as well as Donald does that humiliating your underlings is a great way to keep them in check,” she wrote in a social media post on X to her more than 1.6 million followers.

As argued by journalist Charbel Antoun, Trump walks into the U.S.-China summit with a “weakened” hand given his inability to secure a peace deal with Iran amid the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war against the Middle East nation. And on Monday, Trump’s efforts to end the war on his own terms were undercut after Tehran agreed to a U.S.-Iran peace deal brokered by China.





Erin Burnett blown away as Trump 'mocked across China': 'America has lost its swagger'

Bennito L. Kelty
May 13, 2026 
RAW STORY


Erin Burnett read social media posts from China that mocked Trump as he met with Xi Jinping (CNN/Screenshot)

CNN anchor Erin Burnett was stunned to see the level of uninhibited mockery China has been hurling at Trump during his visit.

"Trump is about to meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping tonight, a high-stakes meeting which is being mocked across China," Burnett explained. "Beijing's strict censors are letting the ridicule go viral, which is a statement in and of itself."

"America has lost its swagger. They're nothing but a paper tiger," one of those viral posts read. "The U.S. economy is in bad shape. Trump has been blustering Iran for so long."

"They will look up to us from now on," read another post that Burnett shared. "Trump came to China! We won the tariff war!" read another.

"Trump, you're welcome to visit China and learn from us," the mockery continued.

"The U.S. is no longer a country that we look up to. We can now compete with them with confidence and strength," a Chinese social media user wrote.

"In China, political content like this never goes viral, especially when you have a head of state coming," Burnett explained. "This is because government censors want this to go viral, and by the tone of the messages, the Chinese government feels they've got the upper hand."



CNN reporter taken aback as Chinese residents let Trump have it

Alexander Willis
May 13, 2026 
RAW STORY


Beijing, China resident Mr. Liu speaks to CNN on Wednesday, May 13, 2026. 
(Screengrab / CNN)

President Donald Trump landed in China on Wednesday ahead of his high-stakes summit with President Xi Jinpingreportedly hoping for help with his deeply unpopular war against Iran – but Beijing residents interviewed by CNN were quick to pour cold water on the idea.

“I don't have a good impression of President Donald Trump at all,” one Beijing resident, identified as Mr. Liu, told CNN. “The U.S.-Iran conflict was stirred up by him, too. Look at the trade and economic war before, wasn't that him too?”

CNN’s Boris Sanchez said, citing U.S. officials, Trump is “expected to encourage Xi to push Iran to re-open the Strait of Hormuz,” a critical shipping waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil trade historically flows. On the ground in Beijing, CNN’s Mike Valerio reiterated Sanchez’s claim and expressed shock at the pushback he personally heard from Beijing residents.

“What's important for everybody back home in America to know: deals and getting help with the war in Iran are far and away the two biggest topics the president is going to raise in his meeting with President Xi Jinping,” Valerio said.

“In terms of asking for help from China to re-open the Strait of Hormuz, we went up and down throughout town in Beijing most of the day yesterday, and I was so struck by so many who told us they do not want China getting involved at all in this U.S.-Israeli war.”

Beijing resident Mr. Li, for instance, told CNN it was not China’s "diplomatic principle” to get involved in such matters. Ms. Yuan, another Beijing resident, was more blunt in her opposition.

“I don't think China should interfere too much in those kinds of issues,” she told CNN.

Trump’s visit to China already got off to “a rocky start,” according to the progressive advocacy platform Call To Activism, after the president stepped off Air Force One to be greeted not by Xi, but by lower-ranking Chinese officials, the optics of which Mary L. Trump, Trump’s niece, described as “humiliating.”




What Trump’s unusual move on 20-hour Air Force One flight to China revealed


U.S. President Donald Trump arrives aboard Air Force One at Beijing Capital International Airport during his visit to the country, in Beijing, China, May 13, 2026.
 REUTERS/Evan Vucci TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

May 13, 2026   
ALTERNET

CNN reported Wednesday morning (U.S. time) that during the 20-plus-hour flight President Donald Trump took from Washington D.C. to Beijing on Tuesday and Wednesday, he never once spoke to the press, which is unusual.

As the president landed in China ahead of his summit with Xi Jinping, Senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes reported that a number of tech CEOs were on the plane with Trump while others took the overflow plane.

"So you see them now opening the door, John, and we'll wait and see how long President Trump takes to actually come out and greet everyone," continued Holmes. "He's been on a long flight and he didn't talk to the press at all, which is incredibly notable. A guy who loves talking to the press, particularly when he's on a 20-or-so-hour flight, he did not do that this time around."

Co-host Kate Bolduan keyed in on the comments and how unusual it was.

"That was actually going to be my question because I was — we of course, as we woke up to the news, you know, woke up to knowing that you guys were all flying over waiting and kind of expecting" Trump to speak to the press, Bolduan explained.

"Are we going to get some information or a gaggle, if nothing else, of the president?" the host asked.

Co-host John Berman returned to the matter in a later conversation, saying that Trump allowed his final remarks about Iran and America's economic situation to marinate in the political news.

Trump on Tuesday, before departing for China, told reporters he doesn't think "even a little bit" about Americans' financial situation when executing the war in Iran.


“The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran, they can't have a nuclear weapon. I don't think about Americans' financial situation. I don't think about anybody. I think about one thing: We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon," Trump said Tuesday.



'Glaring': Speculation abounds as Melania noticeably absent from husband's China trip


Nicole Charky-Chami
May 13, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump and First lady Melania Trump walk to attend an event to mark Military Mother's Day, in the East Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 6, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

President Donald Trump's high-stakes three-day China visit has revealed one person conspicuously missing — his wife, First Lady Melania Trump.

Trump was accompanied to Beijing with his cabinet, his son Eric, and daughter-in-law Lara, and 16 corporate CEOs, The Daily Beast reported. And hours before taking off to leave the United States, the first lady's office dropped a cryptic confirmation in a statement to the South China Morning Post, without any explanation for why she would miss out on the trip.

"First Lady Melania Trump is not travelling this time," Melania's spokesperson said.

When pressed for additional details, her team went silent.

The snub marks the latest chapter in what insiders describe as a widening rift between the first couple.

"The move comes amid speculation about the first lady increasingly breaking with her husband as she seems to be trying to charter her own course," The Beast reported. "Trump and his White House aides were reportedly blindsided last month when she called a surprise press conference to read a statement declaring she had no ties to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The move appeared only to revive the scandal that Trump himself had been eager to put to rest."

Melania has been noticeably absent at the White House throughout the second Trump administration and often does not travel with the president. And although first ladies don't always attend trips, the questions around her attendance have raised eyebrows.

"Her absence is all the more glaring because it follows a trend that has stood out in Trump’s second term: She’s been appearing alongside him less and less on state visits," according to The Beast.

Jen Psaki mocks Vance as Trump jets off without him: 'Doing his homework while Dad's away'

Matthew Chapman
May 13, 2026
RAW STORY





(Screengrab via MS NOW)

Vice President JD Vance drew sharp ridicule from MS NOW host Jen Psaki on Tuesday after he gleefully announced the suspension of more than $1.3 billion in Medicaid payments to California — a move Psaki framed as a naked bid for attention while his political rivals grabbed the spotlight.

"JD Vance is desperately trying to remind dad he's still his most special boy," Psaki quipped on her show, mocking the announcement as political theater designed to keep Vance relevant while Secretary of State Marco Rubio accompanied President Donald Trump to China. "He's still doing his homework, even though dad's away on his big work trip."

Vance himself joked about the seeming disconnect, comparing himself to Macaulay Culkin's character in "Home Alone."


The Trump administration's Medicaid cuts, which California's attorney general said will gut programs that help seniors and people with disabilities remain in their homes, were unveiled with what Psaki described as unusual fanfare — "tons of pomp and circumstance."

The timing was no accident, she argued. Vance made the announcement the day before California Gov. Gavin Newsom was scheduled to unveil the state's annual budget, delivering a one-two punch intended to dominate news cycles and put Newsom on defense.

"Politically speaking, today was kind of a twofer," Psaki said. "He got some headlines to stay relevant while Marco got to ride on the big plane to go do big boy stuff in China. And he got to attack Gavin Newsom."

Newsom is widely considered one of Vance's most formidable potential rivals in the 2028 presidential race, making California a particularly attractive target for the vice president's political maneuvering.



'Amateur hour': CBS News' MAGA-friendly anchor's Taiwan broadcast ends in shambles

Travis Gettys
May 14, 2026 
RAW STORY


Tony Dokoupil/CBS News-YouTube

"CBS Evening News" anchor Tony Dokoupil’s first broadcast from Taiwan ended in shambles after his cameraman suffered an on-air medical emergency.

The MAGA-coded anchorman was introducing the summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping when the camera shot tilted and producers abruptly cut to B-roll footage, reported The Daily Beast.

“Is he okay?” Dokoupil asked after a thud could be heard off camera. “We’re gonna take a quick break, we have an — a medical emergency here. We’re calling a doctor."

Producers showed more B-roll footage of Chinese landscapes played before cutting to a studio shot of CBS News chief correspondent Matt Gutman.

“So I’m going to sign off for Tony Dokoupil, who’s been reporting in Taiwan,” Gutman told viewers. “We’re going to go to break, we’ll be right back.”

CBS News later confirmed on its X account that the camera operator had suffered a medical emergency during the broadcast and made clear that he was expected to recover.

Dokoupil was broadcasting from Taipei instead of Beijing because the network failed to secure a Chinese visa for the anchor, although it's not clear whether the lapse was due to a late application or another issue.

Prior to the emergency, the broadcast had been bedeviled by awkward pauses and technical difficulties.

Dokoupil repeatedly fiddled with his earpiece, which led to lengthy pauses during a handoff from White House correspondent Weijia Jiang reporting live from Beijing and after foreign correspondent Anna Coren finished her report.

“Amateur, amateur, amateur hour," an Emmy-winning network TV executive told the Daily Beast.

The evening news program has seen its rating tumble to just 3.7 million, with only 473,000 average viewers in the closely watched advertising demo of 25-54-year-olds, since conservative pundit Bari Weiss took over as editor-in-chief.

That's far behind "ABC World News Tonight," which averaged 8.2 million total viewers and 976,000 in the key demo, and "NBC Nightly News," which averaged 6.1 million and 903,000, respectively.





'Appalling' director's surprise appearance during Trump's China trip incenses analyst

Robert Davis
May 13, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Xi Jinping shaking hands with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. The scene as U.S. President Donald Trump participates in events at the Great Hall of the People and does a greeting with the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping May 14, 2026, in Beijing China during a trip focused on trade, regional security, and strengthening bilateral ties between the world’s two largest economies. Kenny Holston/Pool via REUTERS


The full breadth of President Donald Trump's entourage of American business leaders and dignitaries was unveiled during a welcoming ceremony in China early Thursday morning, which included an appearance of one individual who incensed a political analyst.

Ana Navarro, a CNN commentator, noted that Brett Ratner, who directed Melania Trump's eponymous documentary on Amazon, was among those selected by Trump to travel with his delegation. Ratner's travel to China on the U.S. taxpayers' dime incensed Navarro because of his sordid history in Hollywood and the harm he's caused to some women.

"There is also another person who is in this official delegation, and that was on Air Force One, and that's Brett Ratner, who was the director and producer of the 'Melania' movie," Navarro said on CNN's "NewsNight." "But let us remember, Brett Ratner had been basically banished from Hollywood in 2017 because there were very serious sexual predatory allegations against him."

"His name is all over the Epstein file because of his association with Epstein," she continued. And so, because he volunteered to do that documentary on Melania, that Amazon allegedly paid $40 million for, he is now being brought back and rehabilitated by Donald Trump."

"I find it appalling, appalling, and I urge people to go look up the women," she added. "Some of the biggest names in Hollywood who spoke up against the sexual harassment and sexual acts of Brett Ratner, which included things like masturbating in front of them. And there he is as part of the official U.S. delegation flying on Air Force One on our dime. I find that appalling."


AI rivalry overshadows push for guardrails at Xi-Trump talks: experts


By AFP
May 12, 2026


Image: — © AFP



Luna Lin with Katie Forster in Tokyo

Fears that artificial intelligence could help people design bioweapons or hack into national infrastructure are mutual concerns for Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, despite their countries’ fierce rivalry over the technology, analysts say.

As the leaders prepare for a rare summit in Beijing this week, policy experts have stressed the importance of US-Chinese discussions on steps to contain the risks, such as a hotline for de-escalation when an AI crisis hits.

But with China set on narrowing the United States’ lead in the strategic sector, the stakes will be high.

“There is a kind of shared concern about where this AI arms race might be going,” and if it could create an “out of control” scenario, said Michael Jinghan Zeng, a professor at City University of Hong Kong.

“Despite critical disagreements on a wide range of issues, there is also this kind of understanding from both sides” on the need for AI guardrails, he told AFP.


The White House recently accused Chinese entities of “industrial-scale” efforts to steal US technology on artificial intelligence
 – Copyright AFP Kent NISHIMURA

The White House recently accused Chinese entities of “industrial-scale” efforts to steal US technology, while Beijing blocked the acquisition of a Chinese-founded AI agent tool by tech giant Meta.

In 2024, Xi agreed with Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden that humans must remain in control of the decision to fire nuclear weapons.

Although little more has followed, Xi and Trump could “commit to some rhetorical signal” in Beijing as a basis for further cooperation, Zeng said.

– ‘Catastrophic risks’ –

The AI cybersecurity threat has been highlighted by Mythos, a powerful new model that US startup Anthropic withheld from public release to stop it from being exploited by hackers.

And “if a non-state actor uses an AI model to develop a biological weapon, that could pose catastrophic risks to both the United States and China,” Chris McGuire of the Council on Foreign Relations wrote in a recent article.

“Over the long term, addressing these risks will require cooperation,” McGuire said, cautioning that China’s “willingness to make and abide by robust international commitments on AI safety is low”.

Washington says the latest AI model from Chinese startup DeepSeek — considered the country’s most advanced — is about eight months behind the top offerings from US companies.

To stop Chinese tech firms catching up too quickly, the United States bars them from purchasing the most cutting-edge chips made by California-based Nvidia.

China has boosted its domestic AI chip industry in response, and could be hoping to use its control over rare earths as leverage at the summit on Thursday and Friday.

– ‘Intertwined’ –

Top US executives, including Tesla’s Elon Musk and Apple’s Tim Cook, will accompany Trump — with Nvidia boss Jensen Huang a last-minute addition to the trip.

Chen Liang, founder of Strategic Times Consulting, told AFP he did not expect any “dramatic breakthroughs”.

Trump’s visit will merit attention if he and Xi manage to “shelve the most sensitive issues” while establishing “rule-based tracks” on points of cooperation, Chen said.

But competition is likely to remain stiff “in high-tech sectors like AI chips that directly involve the core interests of both sides”.

Beijing has refuted accusations made by the White House of large-scale Chinese AI “distillation” of US rivals — a practice often used by companies to create cheaper, smaller versions of their own models.

Meanwhile, China’s top economic planning body has blocked Meta’s $2-billion bid for China-founded, Singapore-based AI agent startup Manus.

The move, which followed a regulatory review, has been seen as a sign of China’s growing oversight of its AI sector.

Yet “the talent, capital, and supply chains underpinning the field are deeply intertwined across the United States and China,” said Grace Shao, a China AI analyst and author of the AI Proem newsletter.

“Any delusion of full decoupling isn’t realistic on any near-term horizon”, she told AFP.

“Leadership in the technology… will define the next decade of productivity and growth, so it’s in everyone’s interest that the two superpowers find common ground on sensible guardrails for AI.”

Op-Ed: Trump and entourage meet Xi – Historical roleplay vs a lot of issues


ByPaul Wallis
DIGITAL JOURNAL
May 12, 2026


Chinese exports increased 5.5 percent last year, despite a bruising trade war with Washington - Copyright AFP STR

The meeting between Trump and Xi this week is likely to be one of history’s much-publicized and much-misunderstood events. It will have a significance that history is likely to miss completely. This is an opportunity to clean up a global mess that could simply be ignored.

This is not, and cannot be, just another mere scripted diplomatic get together of “the guys”. The America and China of the past are very different now. They’re on different pages of the global situation in many ways. The balance of economic power is an integral part of the meeting, and it’s likely to impact the next few decades.

It’s an odd mix of people and entities. The meeting almost looks like a board meeting. Trump is bringing an entourage of Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and other luminaries from corporate America with him. Their elevation to the status of national representatives may irritate some, but they are players in the wider global trade game that China is winning.

There’s a lot to talk about:

Trade: China is dominating global trade, and the US is struggling with its trade policies at the most fundamental levels. The friction is real enough, and it’s becoming increasingly clear that China has the upper hand.

AI: The economic models of AI for the US and China are poles apart. Investment markets are having to wade through the increasing range of future challenges in the AI and tech diasporas. Notable challenges include dealing with the complexities of state owned enterprises and vastly different regulatory systems.

Taiwan: This nearly 80-year-old grim reminder of the past is evolving in PRC and Taiwan relations, but the US doesn’t have a clear stated strategic position.

Rare earths: The critical minerals market, which China has snared, underpins core resources for advanced technologies. An agreement between the US and China is in place, although it’s seen as a “ceasefire” in trade negotiations rather than a fixture in terms of trade.

Iran: China is very much opposed to the US war with Iran. That position is unlikely to change.

There’s another glaring issue. The US is no longer acting as the nominal leader of the free world. The constant abrasion and distortion of US relations with allies haven’t helped. In Asia, Trump is being referred to as a “supplicant”. In that sense, Trump cannot negotiate from a position of strength in global strategic terms.

The inevitable question must be asked. What can realistically be achieved by the Trump and Xi meeting? Clarification of trade, defusing tensions, forward-looking trade and cooperation, or what? Or just more of the same, diplomatically expressed, however inadequate that may be?

The world needs clarity. Let’s hope it happens.

____________________________________________________________

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this Op-Ed are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the Digital Journal or its members.



Saturday, August 12, 2023

Priest: My conversion on LGBTQ rights tells an important story

 Opinion by Michael Coren • CNN

Editor’s Note: Father Michael Coren is an Anglican priest, journalist and writer. He is a columnist for the Toronto Star, frequent contributor to the Globe and Mail and the author of 18 books. The views expressed here are his own. Read more opinion on CNN.

I don’t think I was ever a homophobe, but I certainly came close.


Michael Coren - Courtesy Rev Michael Coren© Provided by CNN

That is a profoundly shocking thought, and extremely painful for me to say, especially as, for the past decade, I’ve been regarded in Canada as a Christian champion of equal marriage, same-sex blessings and the full affirmation of LGBTQ+ people in the church. The change, the transformation, the conversion – for that is what it was – came about for various reasons, but mostly because of a new reading and understanding of the Bible.

I became an ally because of a deeper faith. Here I now had to stand. I could do no other.

Some background and context: Until 2013 I was a Roman Catholic, and as a journalist and broadcaster with a fairly high profile, spoke and wrote frequently in support of Catholic sexual teachings. There are, of course, many Catholics who dissent from the official line, but the official line it remains. And according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered” and “contrary to the natural law.” Pope Francis has made some soothing and compromising comments but, at heart, very little has changed. In January 2023, Pope Francis told The Associated Press that “being homosexual is not a crime,” yet then reiterated that homosexuality was “a sin” under Catholic doctrine. And while he encouraged bishops to welcome gay people into their ministries “with tenderness,” he also discredited larger attempts to alter existing church practices, which included attempts to provide church blessings to same-sex couples.

I suppose I could have tried to find a way to ignore this, but life’s messy realities do find a way. In March 2014, the humanitarian organization World Vision US announced that it would hire Christians in same-sex marriages in its US offices. The organization’s motives were entirely noble, if a little naïve. Within two days, numerous leading evangelical groups denounced the charity, threatening to withdraw support. World Vision apologized, reversed its new policy and asked for forgiveness. It seemed such a cruel over-reaction, such a humiliation of good people.

At around the same time, Canada’s then-foreign minister John Baird criticized the Ugandan president for legislation that could lead to life imprisonment for gay sex. I supported Baird on my television show, arguing that even those of us who disagreed with same-sex marriage surely condemned such a monstrous policy. As a result, I was roundly attacked by Christian conservatives, Catholic as well as Protestant.

I felt as if I were being pushed against a wall of uncertainty. My defense of traditional Christian teachings on the issue was, I’d always assumed, based on love rather than hate. I started to question myself. Was that a self-defense mechanism, a comforting denial of truth? Perhaps. And that creeping doubt led me to return to scripture. “Tolle Lege,” said that mysterious voice to St. Augustine. Take up and read. So, I did.

The Bible can be as gentle as a watercolor and as powerful as a thunderstorm. It can be taken literally or taken seriously but not always both. It’s a library written over centuries, containing poetry and metaphor as well as history and biography, and without discernment, it makes little sense. It has to be, must be, read through the prism of empathy and the human condition.

The thing is, the Bible hardly mentions homosexuality, which is of course a word not coined until the late 19th-century. The so-called “gotcha” verses from the Old Testament are specific to ancient customs and are often misunderstood. The Sodom story, for example, wasn’t interpreted as referring to homosexuality until the 11th-century. Lot – the hero of the text – offers his virgin daughters to the mob in place of his guests, so it can’t exactly be used as a compelling morality tale!

Ezekiel in the Hebrew Scriptures says, “This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty, and did abominable things before me” (Ezekiel 16:49-50).

The Old Testament never speaks of lesbianism, and its mentions of sex are more about procreation and the preservation of the tribe than personal morality and romance. It also has some rather disturbing things to say about slavery in Genesis and in Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, about ethnic cleansing in Deuteronomy and even killing children in First Samuel. So a precise guide to modern manners it’s certainly not.

Jesus doesn’t mention the issue, and St. Paul’s comments, mainly in his letters to the Romans, are more about men using young male prostitutes in pagan initiation rites than about loving, consenting same-sex relationships. There is, however, one possible discussion in the New Testament. It’s when Jesus is approached by a centurion whose beloved male servant is dying. Will Jesus cure him? Of course, and Jesus then praises the Roman for his faith. The Greek word used to describe the relationship between the Roman and his “beloved” servant indicates something far deeper than mere platonic affection.

Then there’s the love of David and Jonathan, Jesus refusing to judge and the pristine beauty of grace and justice that informs the Gospels. Most of all, there’s the permanent revolution of love that Jesus didn’t request but demand. His central teaching, remember, is to love God and love our neighbors as ourselves. We’re told this in three of the four Gospels — Matthew (22:35-40), Mark (12:28-34) and Luke (10:27). It’s a transformational moment for Christians, to know that only by loving others can we properly know and love God.

As I read more, I prayed more. As I prayed more, I reached out to gay Christians, who taught me lessons in forgiveness that shamed me. I made a public apology in my syndicated newspaper column for harm caused to the LGBTQ+ community by my writing and broadcasting. As a consequence, I felt the full force of those on the political and religious right. I’ve reported from Northern Ireland and the Middle East but seldom seen such visceral hatred. Abuse, threats, attacks on my children and campaigns to have me canceled and fired. Thank God, because it confirmed everything that I’d come to believe.

I became an Anglican, and three years later entered seminary. I’m now a priest, spend my time trying to preach the genuine song of the Gospels, and write books and columns doing the same. In other words, I’m a Christian conservative’s nightmare. But for me, a dream lived. I found truth. I found Jesus. This straight, 64-year-old man, married for 36 years and with four children, has a lot to be grateful for. Most of all, I thank the gay community for teaching me so much about what Christianity really means.


Thursday, April 13, 2023

The Rebel Christ by Michael Coren

14 APRIL 2023

David Chillingworth on the challenge posed by an ex-conservative


MICHAEL COREN is an Anglican priest — English by birth and now living in Canada. His story is interesting and unusual. He was a successful journalist and author — and a Roman Catholic priest. He describes himself as having been until 2013 “a champion of orthodox Catholicism”. He says that, to his shame, he was rather good at it. His book Why Catholics are Right sold nearly 50,000 copies.

But then things began to change, particularly when he encountered Ugandan homophobia. Beyond that, he met a “fetish of reactionary ideas around gender, sex, power, relationships and personal choice”.

Faced with this, Coren says, “I stopped speaking and started listening, entered into belief as a dialogue, opened my eyes rather than folded my arms. Yes, I met the rebel Christ.”

This is a brave book. The forces of rampant conservatism which Coren is taking on — forces that he describes as “triumphalist, proud and sectarian” — are not to be underestimated in their power. In his view, ranged against that “cult of the bunker” is the supreme paradox that is Christianity. That paradox claims that “in defeat is victory and in death is life.”

In the background of this book, one senses the constant presence of the “almost parallel version of the faith” which has been developed by American Evangelical conservatives: religious freedom, gun rights, support for Israel, resistance to LGBTQ2 equality (the “2” refers to “two-spirited” in Native American culture), and objection to abortion.

Facing that right-wing agenda, Coren explores the question how the Bible is to be read and understood. He courageously addresses the questions of gay rights and gay marriage, abortion, capital punishment, and slavery. Always, one senses that he is attempting to make his picture of the Rebel Christ as compelling as the alternative and conservative pictures are to so many. He says, “We are thinking, questioning men and women trying to find paths of goodness.”

There is one aspect of his subject which Coren does not address. It is the question — which others have referred to as “deep underlying concepts” — why some people take up what are in general liberal and flexible positions while others become deeply and defensively conservative in their attitudes. Not only would it be interesting and important to know why people are as they are: it might also provide a key to the deep changes in attitude for which Coren and many others yearn.


The Rt Revd David Chillingworth is a former Primus of the Scottish Episcopal Church.
The Rebel Christ
Michael Coren
Canterbury Press 
(978-1-78622-479-8)


FOR MY CRITIQUES OF THE 'CONSERVATIVE REACTIONARY CATHOLIC' COREN SEE

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

Climate models predicted heatwaves like America’s record-breaking weekend


Michael J. Coren
Sun, June 20, 2021
QUARTZ


The US hasn’t seen anything quite like this. Over the weekend, temperatures soared to new triple-digit heights across the American West. The immediate cause was a “heat dome,” a mass of high-pressure air trapping heat beneath it, one far stronger and larger than normal.

But what we saw this weekend is what climate scientists have been predicting for decades. And it’s a taste of what’s to come. “It’s surreal to see your models become real life,” Katharine Hayhoe, climate scientist and chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy, says in the Guardian.

Records fell across the region. On June 17, California’s capital of Sacramento hit 110°F (43°C), smashing the last record of 102°F set in 1976. Similar all-time highs fell in Las Vegas, Denver, Phoenix, and other cities thousands of miles apart. In Death Valley National Park, where temperatures soared to 128°F, just one degree off the record, nighttime temperatures stayed above 111°F (44°C) well past midnight, among the hottest nights ever recorded in North America.

It’s hard to argue with climate models


What climate models predicted is coming true. Scientists forecast global warming would fuel higher temperatures, falling humidity, dwindling snowpack, and intensifying drought. So far, this is coming to pass, despite some uncertainty about how this will play out in the coming century.

Extreme heatwaves are now an estimated 3 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit warmer across the US, estimates Michael Wehner, a senior scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. In the West, the hottest days have gotten about 33% drier in Nevada and California over the last 40 years, according to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) climate scientist Karen McKinnon. A “megadrought” now engulfing the region is eclipsing any period for the last 1,200 years.

Little of this is surprising for scientists who run supercomputers modeling the planet’s atmosphere. In 2019, climate scientist Zeke Hausfather analyzed 17 climate models run between 1970 and 2007 and found more than half predicted outcomes “indistinguishable from what actually occurred.” More than 80% correctly analyzed how the atmosphere would respond to rising greenhouse gases level after controlling for models that overestimated humans’ GHG emissions.
When will the heatwave be over?

The West’s drought appears to be without precedent in recorded history. From Oregon to the Mexican border, drought intensity has reached “exceptional” levels. Decades of low rainfall, and two especially dry years, have turned the region into a tinderbox with 100 million dead trees in California alone, and millions more ready to burn. With the hottest, and driest, period of the year still ahead, conditions are “as bad as they can be,” says Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at UCLA.


Last year, similar (but not as dry) conditions led to an apocalyptic fire season that killed 33, burned 4% of the state (4.4 million acres), and left the entire coast languishing under blood-red skies. Fires are breaking out again in California more than a month early, with forests primed to go up in flames. Ranchers and farmers are starting to talk about shrinking their herds, or ending their livelihoods, as the wells dry up: 20% of California’s prime farmland in the San Joaquin Valley has been fallowed.

On the surface, water is vanishing as well. For the first time, the massive reservoir behind the Hoover Dam, Lake Mead, registered just 37% full. That’s threatening power and water supplies for seven states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming) in the Colorado River basin (the dam’s generation is already down 25%). In California, the loss of snowpack means that power generation is forecast to drop 70% below the 10-year average, while some power-producing dams, such as the one on Lake Oroville, could stop generating power for the first time since they were built more than 50 years ago.

This week’s misery won’t go on forever, and some relief is in sight for the West this week. Temperatures will ease as the heat dome begins to dissipate over the Southwest. But a new heatwave is already gaining steam, this time in northern California and up along the Pacific coast. More misery is in store. “Additional records may be set, once again,” writes Swain.

Tuesday, June 01, 2021

Survivors, faith leaders, call on Catholic Church to take responsibility for residential schools

Jon Hernandez 
CBC NEWS
JUNE 1,2021
© Ben Nelms/CBC People pay their respects at a memorial in Vancouver after the Tk'emlúps te Secwépemc First Nation reported that ground-penetrating radar scans of the grounds of the former Kamloops Indian Residential School revealed the remains of…

Taking in the sight of hundreds of shoes on the steps of the Vancouver Art Gallery, the magnitude of what was found buried beneath the former Kamloops Indian Residential School grounds isn't lost on Carmen Lansdowne.

She's a member of B.C.'s Heiltsuk First Nation, and her grandparents were among those taken away from their families decades ago.

"I have flashes of anger and frustration, combined with grief and sadness and numbness," she told CBC News on Monday.

Lansdowne is also a minister of the First United Church, an inner-city ministry of the United Church of Canada. In 1998, the United Church formally apologized for its role in operating residential schools in Canada.
 Jon Hernandez/CBC Carmen Lansdowne, an ordained minister at First United Church, stands in front of a memorial in Vancouver for victims of the Kamloops Indian Residential School.

"I don't think I could be an ordained minister in the United Church of Canada if we hadn't been honest in our role," she said.

The Tk'emlúps te Secwépemc First Nation in B.C. said last Thursday that preliminary findings from a survey of the grounds at the former residential school in Kamloops revealed the remains of 215 children — some as young as three years old.

In the wake of the find, survivors, Indigenous leaders and advocates, and faith leaders are calling on the Roman Catholic Church to apologize and take responsibility for the atrocities committed against children, families and communities in the residential school system.

"As an Indigenous ordained minister, it deeply pains me to see our ecumenical partners not do that work," said Lansdowne.

The Roman Catholic Church was responsible for operating up to 70 per cent of residential schools, according to the Indian Residential School Survivors Society (IRSSS). United, Anglican and Presbyterian churches were among those operating the remainder.

In the years since, the Roman Catholic Church is the only one that hasn't made a formal apology.

"They have caused the greatest harm in many of our communities," said Angela White, IRSSS executive director.



Video: Calgarians offer Indigenous prayers for healing after Kamloops mass grave found (Global News)

An apology for the Catholic Church's role in the residential school system is also one of the calls to action from the Truth and Reconcilation Commission of Canada (TRC).

The TRC has confirmed the names of more than 4,000 children who died at residential schools and there are many more who have not been identified or are missing.
 Jon Hernandez/CBC Angela White, executive director of the Indian Residential School Survivors Society, says the Roman Catholic Church needs to apologize for the atrocities committed at residential schools, and should offer resources, including counselling, to victims.

Church leaders respond


In response to the announcement of the discovery of the human remains, Richard Gagnon, the president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, issued a statement expressing sorrow for the lives lost.

"Honouring the dignity of the lost little ones demands that the truth be brought to light," he wrote.

There was a similar message by Vancouver Archbishop J. Michael Miller, who, speaking for the church, said "we pledge to do whatever we can to heal that suffering."
Missing apologies

But critics say there's one key word missing from those statements: "Sorry."

Rev. Michael Coren, an Anglican priest and author, is among those who have been the most vocal following the Kamloops discovery, penning a column directed at the Catholic Church.

"Every church, virtually every church in Canada, was involved in this catastrophe," he told host Stephen Quinn on CBC's The Early Edition. "And that should never be denied."

© Ben Nelms/CBC People pay their respects at the memorial in Vancouver.

"[The Roman Catholic Church] simply will not make a commitment to its direct involvement in these atrocities because, I would argue, it's terrified of the financial and legal consequences if it does," he said.

The survivors society has issued calls to action, similar to the TRC, aimed at both the federal government and the Catholic Church. That includes an acknowledgement from the Pope.

When it comes to healing, Angela White says it starts with "sorry," but true reconciliation requires an ongoing dialogue.

"We should have them be accountable to providing resources, whether it's money or counselling, for the damage that they've done, so the healing can continue," she said.

"We shouldn't have to be figuring out how we're going to heal, when they're the ones that did the damage."

With files from CBC's The Early Edition


Saturday, March 27, 2021


Scientists show direct evidence of humans' role in climate change

Michael J. Coren 1 day ago


© Provided by Quartz

Every year, the sun sends radiation toward Earth equivalent to more than 7,000 times humans’ annual energy consumption. Much of it is reflected out into space (about 30%), ricocheting off the atmosphere; the rest is absorbed or reflected back out after reaching Earth’s surface. Global warming happens when the greenhouse gases dumped into the atmosphere act like a warm, insulating blanket, capturing this energy rather than letting it escape.

For decades, scientists have relied on models to predict exactly how fast the world is warming due to human activities. And they’ve gotten very good at them. But scientists publishing in the journal Geophysical Research Letters on March 25 reported the first direct global observations of how much aerosols and greenhouse gases released by humans are driving climate change. “It’s direct evidence that human activities are causing changes to Earth’s energy budget,” said Ryan Kramer, co-author of the paper and a researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

Since 1977, NASA has been continuously studying Earth’s energy budget by flying instruments aboard satellites with the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project. These have delivered detailed measurements of the planet’s radiation budget: how much enters, how much escapes, and how much soaks into the oceans. The new study is the first to account for human activities—as well as natural factors such as water vapor, clouds, and surface reflectivity—to precisely pin down the Earth’s energy imbalance, the “distinct fingerprints of anthropogenic activity in Earth’s changing energy budget.”

The study concluded human activities increased this imbalance, also known as “radiative forcing,” by about 0.5 watts per square meter between 2003 to 2018, mostly due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. For context, that’s about the equivalent of keeping nearly 5 trillion 60-watt light bulbs lit across the Earth’s surface all the time.

Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at the environmental research group Breakthrough Institute, said the study “largely validates what we already know but in a more straightforward observation-based way,” pointing to a 2015 study in Nature that measured CO2 radiative forcing on the Earth’s surface as another example.

That data lines up well with scientists’ climate models, but it also offers a faster way to monitor how mitigation efforts are working and to test computationally-intensive models. It might also influence those who continue to doubt the overwhelming climate consensus among 97% of publishing climate scientists. “In my experience,” said Hausfather, “skeptics tend to be more swayed by observations than models, so it’s certainly helpful. It creates a pretty high bar to explain away.”

Thursday, January 21, 2021

 


Trump’s promise to put coal miners back to work was a failure

REUTERS/LEAH MILLIS
Former US president Donald Trump at a Charleston, West Virginia rally in 2018.
  • Michael J. Coren
By Michael J. Coren

Climate reporter

In 2016, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump made a promise to coal miners at a rally in West Virginia. “For those miners, get ready because you’re going to be working your asses off,” he told them, wearing a white hard hat. “We’ll be winning, winning, winning.”

After four years of the Trump administration, coal has been losing, losing, losing. Not that Trump can take the blame (or the credit). Dismal economics have been inexorably displacing coal as the fuel of choice in the US and around the world. Trump made some attempts to stop the bleeding—easing air pollution laws and propping up ailing plants—and in 2017, falsely claimed those efforts were working. “We are putting the coal miners back to work, just as I promised,” he said.

But, the data tell a different story. The number of people employed by the coal mining industry has fallen 15% since Trump took office in January 2017. Despite job losses that temporarily stabilized during his years in office, according to US Bureau of Labor Statistics Data, the trend is continuing. Jobs did not increase, unhelped by Trump’s trade wars and unsuccessful efforts to use the Defense Production Act to prop up coal plants, before the pandemic curtailed coal demand and employment.

Production has followed suit. Despite coal prices remaining stable around $35 per ton over the last decade, production fell during Trump’s years in office to just 706 million short tons, the lowest amount since 1978, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

Coal still generates 38% of global electricity, the largest share of any fuel. But that is falling in many countries as the price of solar, wind, and natural gas dips below coal, cutting into the industry’s profits. During the first half of 2020, global coal capacity fell for the first time since at least the 1950s, reports the nonprofit Global Energy Monitor.

In the US, many coal boilers are now simply too expensive to run. In the last five years, utilities have shut down more than 48 gigawatts of coal-fired generation capacity. The pandemic accelerated that trend: As energy demand dipped, the most expensive sources were taken offline first. In 2021, another 2.7 GW, or 1% of the US coal fleet, is scheduled to be retired. Soon, it will be cheaper to build new solar or wind farms than continue operating old coal plants, accelerating retirements further.

But there remains one bright spot for US coal producers: exports. The rest of the world still has a huge (and in some cases growing) coal fleet. China and India support the industry through heavy state subsidies, and China doubled the pace of new coal permitting last year with least 250 GW of new coal power capacity planned. For now, American coal mines’ only new business is likely to come from overseas.

QZ