Wednesday, September 14, 2022

REST IN POWER

Jean-Luc Godard: French-Swiss film director dies at age 91

France has lost "a national treasure," said French President Emmanuel Macron. Godard was one of the most influential film directors and was often credited with revolutionizing cinema.

Godard was born in Paris on December 3, 1930

Franco-Swiss filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard has died at the age of 91, the French newspaper Liberation reported on Tuesday.

Godard was one of the leading figures of the movement. Critics rated him among the top 10 directors of all time, and he has had a direct influence on the likes of Quentin Tarantino, Bernardo Bertolucci, Steven Soderbergh and Martin Scorsese.

French President Emmanuel Macron said France lost "a national treasure" with Godard's death. 

Interest in anthropology influenced filmmaking style

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, a small group of French filmmakers turned the cinema world on its head. They called themselves the Nouvelle Vague — or New Wave — and they broke all the established rules of filmmaking.

Born in Paris on December 3, 1930, Godard moved to Switzerland with his family at age 4. For much of his youth he lived on the Swiss side of Lake Geneva, where his father, a physician, ran a clinic. He returned to Paris after the war, to complete his baccalaureate.

He studied at the University of Paris and planned to pursue a career in anthropology. Although he never completed his degree, his interest in ethnology informed his filmmaking style, as he would use documentary film techniques to create what became called "cinema verite."

His interest in films blossomed in 1950, when he joined the Ciné-Club du Quartier Latin. There he met Claude Chabrol and Francois Truffaut, who would also become influential members of the Nouvelle Vague. Initially though, his interest in films was purely as a critic. He wrote for the publication Cahiers du Cinema.

It wasn't until 1954 that he was inspired to make his first short film, while working as a laborer on the Grand Dixence dam in Switzerland. With a borrowed camera, he shot Operation Beton (1954; Operation Concrete). The construction company bought the film and used it for publicity purposes.



JEAN-LUC GODARD: SELECTED FILMS
'Sympathy for The Devil' (1968)
Innovative filmmaker and radical intellectual: Jean-Luc Godard, born in Paris on December 3, 1930, has never been interested in conventions; he's regularly ignored film awards and honors. The director likes to go beyond the boundaries of standard film productions, even doing without screenplays. In 1968, he ventured into a new genre and made an experimental documentary about the Rolling Stones.
1234567891011


 

Breaking all the rules

A keen admirer of German playwright Bertolt Brecht, Godard wanted to translate Brecht's concept of "epic theater" into the language of film. Over the next few years, Godard, Truffaut and others worked to produce a series of short films. They developed a new take on filmmaking, using lightweight equipment, natural lighting, long takes, sometimes with improvised dialogue. The established rules of filmmaking and narrative continuity fell to the cutting room floor.

Then in 1960, Godard made his first feature film, A Bout de Souffle (Breathless). The film, produced by Francois Truffaut and starring Jean Seberg and Jean-Paul Belmondo, was the turning point in his career.

A Bout de Souffle heavily referenced American film noir of the 1940s and 50s, but also combined the Nouvelle Vague's groundbreaking new techniques. The story of a car-thief who shoots a policeman and is then turned over by his girlfriend used hand-held camera work, incidental lighting, actor monologues to camera and jump-cuts.

It was the start of his most successful and influential period of filmmaking. 

A new tsunami of creativity

Between 1960 to 1967 was a period of intense activity for Godard, in which he made the dozen films which form his Nouvelle Vague canon.

The most successful was the 1963 feature Le Mepris (Contempt), starring Brigitte Bardot. It was the most expensive film he made, and his only orthodox film, though it took Nouvelle Vague techniques and solidified them as the accepted way of modern cinema.

After Pierrot le Fou (1965), his second film starring Belmondo, he was asked to direct Bonnie and Clyde, but he knocked back the offer, saying he distrusted Hollywood.

Godard's political views had already appeared in films such as Le petit soldat, about the Algerian War of Independence. But in his final film in the Nouvelle Vague genre, Week-End, he delivered a scathing attack against consumerism and bourgeois society. Then in the closing credits, instead of simply "Fin," he screen lit up with "Le Fin du Cinema," or "The End of Cinema."

Political upheaval and militancy

Inspired by the May 1968 protest movement that shook Paris and other European cities, Godard became increasingly politically outspoken. With his longtime friend Francois Truffaut, he led protests that shut down the 1968 Cannes Film Festival, to show solidarity with the students and workers.

Godard's revolutionary and Marxist rhetoric pervaded both his films and his public statements. He openly criticized the Vietnam War. Between 1968 and 1973, he and Jean-Pierre Gorin made a series of films with a strong Maoist message. The best-known of them is Tout Va Bien (Just Great, 1972), starring Yves Montand and Jane Fonda. But towards the end of 1970s, Godard lost faith in his Maoist ideals.

Accusations of antisemitism

Although Godard's movie-making slowed down in the 1980s, later in life he continued to attract controversy. The Catholic Church accused him of heresy after Je Vous Salue, Marie (1985). Critics described his interpretation of Shakespeare's King Lear (1987) as "tired and labored," and "sad and embarrassing." Godard was accused of trashing his own legend.

Accusations of antisemitism dogged Godard since he traveled to the Middle East in 1970 to make a pro-Palestinian film, which he never completed; and remarks about Moses which he made on French television in 1981.

But in his book Everything is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard, author Richard Brody argues that Godard's work treats the Holocaust with "great moral seriousness," and says that the Moses comments have been taken out of context.

His 2018 film, an avant-garde essay film called The Image Book (2018), was nominated for the Palme d'Or at the 2018 Cannes Film Festival. The influential director remained active into his 90s.

Assisted suicide: Death of cinema giant Jean-Luc Godard revives debate in France

French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday announced a national debate on end-of-life options that will include exploring the possibility of legalizing assisted suicide. Macron's announcement came the day the family of French director Jean-Luc Godard said he died by assisted suicide at his home in the Swiss town of Rolle

 

Jean-Luc Godard: Nine things about the man who remade cinema

By Thom Poole
BBC News

  • PublishedShare
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Godard on the set of Pierrot le Fou

Jean-Luc Godard, who has died aged 91, was one of the most influential directors in the history of cinema.

The French-Swiss filmmaker found fame in the late 1950s as one of the leading figures in the French movement known as the New Wave, going on to direct dozens of films in a career lasting more than half a century. Here are nine things to know.

1. He changed film with a girl and a gun

All you need to make a film, Godard once wrote, is a "girl and gun". He proved it with his 1960 debut Breathless (À Bout de Souffle).

The girl, Patricia, is involved with a petty criminal, Michel, who is on the run for shooting a policeman. She betrays him and police shoot him dead in the street.

Breathless resembled a crime drama, but as with many of his works the plot was just a frame for Godard to explore culture, experiment with image, and examine cinema itself.

It had an instant impact, winning acclaim and a huge profit on its meagre budget.

Nearly 60 years on, it is widely acknowledged as a classic and its energy still startles.

2. He cut up convention

One of the most radical elements of Breathless was the prominent use of the editing technique known as the jump cut.

Filmmaking both before and after Godard's debut largely favours smooth editing to give the illusion of continuous time.

By contrast, in Breathless, Godard would cut within the shot, making time appear to jump forward.

IMAGE SOURCE,BREATHLESS
Image caption,
Jump-cuts in Breathless: Godard edited within shots, causing the image to leap forward in time and space

It is jarring, as Godard surely intended it to be. At the very least it grabs the viewer's attention, but it has also been interpreted as reflecting Michel's boredom or as an attempt by Godard to force his audience to reflect on the nature of the cinema.

Throughout his career Godard would play with the grammar of filmmaking.

3. He rewrote the script

There were other innovations. Breathless was filmed on location, using handheld cameras, with Godard writing the script on the day, feeding lines to his actors as they filmed.

This was another break with tradition, with expensive studio-led films depending on tight scripts, large crews and storyboarding.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Godard devised new ways of making films but they were a headache for others involved

The technique used by Godard gives Breathless great spontaneity and a documentary-like feel.

He would use it in many of his films, infuriating his stars who would turn up on set not yet knowing what their lines would be.

Godard and his New Wave contemporaries saw truly great films as being stamped with the vision of the director - and what better way to control a film if you are in effect making it up as you go along.

4. He was a huge cinephile

Godard might have been an iconoclast, but it came from a place of deep knowledge and affection for cinema.

Before becoming a director, he was an avid cinemagoer, sometimes watching the same film several times in one day at the clubs he and other New Wave figures attended

Like other figures from the era, he was first a critic, developing his ideas of what he thought cinema should be that he was able to carry out in practice.

His films are littered with references to other works and even as he sought to push the medium forward he could not help but look back.

5. He kept innovating

Breathless alone would have secured his place in film history, but his has been a prolific career. The IMDB lists more than 100 works, including shorts, documentaries, TV series and more than 40 feature-length films.

The 1960s saw his most celebrated and widely watched works, from what he called a "neorealist musical", 1961's A Woman Is a Woman (Une femme est une femme) to the 1965 dystopian science-fiction Alphaville to 1967's black comedy, Weekend, featuring Emily Bronte being set on fire.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Godard and Brigitte Bardot (R), who was the lead in his 1963 film Le Mépris (Contempt)

After Weekend he embraced political radicalism, making a series of Marxist-themed films that culminated in 1972's All's Well (Tout Va Bien).

In the decades that followed he retold the virgin birth, prompting a complaint from then-Pope John Paul II (Hail Mary), tried and failed to recruit Richard Nixon as an actor (King Lear) and released an epic personal history of film (Histoire(s) du cinéma). In 2014, while in his 80s, he released an experimental 3D film starring his dog Roxy (Goodbye to Language).

6. He made the audience work

There is no getting away from it - Godard's films range from the challenging to the near incomprehensible.

He has enjoyed commercial success but later works saw limited releases despite critical adoration.

Godard was a voracious reader on top of his love of cinema and the sheer weight of references can be bewildering, Barely 70 minutes long, Goodbye to Language, for example, packs in nods to abstract painter Nicolas de Staël, modernist US author William Faulkner and mathematician Laurent Schwartz.

Also at play is one of Godard's most important influences, German dramatist Bertolt Brecht.

Brecht wanted his audience to remain critically engaged in his work, and so deployed a number of methods to unsettle them and remind them they are watching something artificial.

Several of Godard's films use Brechtian devices, such as 1967's La Chinoise (The Chinese)which includes lurid captions and actors breaking the fourth wall, with Godard even leaving the clapper board in at the start of scenes.

7. He put himself in his art

In many of his works the lead can be seen as a proxy for Godard himself.

In 1963's Le Mépris (Contempt), Michel Piccoli plays a French playwright tasked with reworking a film adaptation of Ulysses.

The film explores the tensions between commercialism and creativity and portrays a disintegrating marriage, modelled on Godard's relationship with Anna Karina, the star of several of his films.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
Godard with Anne Wiazemsky, his former wife and star of several of his films

Characters in his film are often are a mouthpiece for himself but in later years he made himself a feature of his films.

In 1995 he made the autobiographical JLG/JLG - Self-Portrait in December and his essay films feature his own voice, most recently in 2018's The Image Book.

US critic Roger Ebert's assessment of Godard in 1969 described him as "deeply into his own universe", a good explanation of why Godard's films can be both so distinctive and so frustrating.

8. He could be a 'shit'

Not unjustifiably Godard has the reputation of being difficult both personally and professionally.

His two marriages, first to Anna Karina and then to Anne Wiazemsky, were stormy, something that spilt out into his films.

Angered by producer Iain Quarrier's recut of his 1968 Rolling Stones documentary Sympathy for the Devil, Godard punched him in the face when it was shown in London.

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
The filming of Sympathy For the Devil, also known as One Plus One

There was an extraordinary row with his friend, another great New Wave director, François Truffaut.

In 1973, Godard wrote to Truffaut attacking his latest film, Day For Night, and asking for funds to make a response. Truffaut wrote a furious reply, accusing Godard of behaving "like a shit" and listing years of misconduct by Godard. Unsurprisingly, Truffaut refused to pay for Godard's film. The pair's relationship never recovered.

But collaboration was an important part of his career too.

His early films would not be the same without Karina or Wiazemsky, nor Godard surrogate Jean-Paul Belmondo.

He forged a close partnership with leftist thinker Jean-Pierre Gorin and cinematographer Raoul Coutard, who said: "He can be a shit... but he's a genius."

Since the 1970s his most important collaborator has been his life partner, the Swiss filmmaker Anne-Marie Miéville.

9. But he was also an inspiration

Film industries around the world saw their own New Waves. America's New Wave gave us works like Bonnie & Clyde, Chinatown and Jaws.

The work of Godard himself - whether personal, experimental, political or all three - has had a massive impact.

US director Quentin Tarantino named his production company A Band Apart, a reference to Godard's 1963 film Bande à part (Band of Outsiders). Italian director Bernardo Bertolucci included a homage to it in his film The Dreamers.

Godard's influence can be seen in the blurring of documentary and fiction by Iranian director Abbas Kiarostami or in the thematically and formally provocative work of Denmark's Lars Von Trier.

Four Godard films made Sight and Sound's list of 50 greatest films ever - Breathless, Le Mépris, Pierrot le Fou and Histoire(s) du cinéma.

UK monarchy criticised over staff redundancy notices

Author: AFP|Update: 14.09.2022


Up to 100 employees who work at King Charles III's ex-official residence have been issued redundancy notices / © AFP

A British trade union on Wednesday criticised as "callous" a decision by the monarchy to issue redundancy notices this week to some staff at King Charles III's former official residence.

Up to 100 employees who work at Clarence House, including some there for decades, reportedly received the notifications on Monday during a prayer service in Edinburgh for the late Queen Elizabeth II.

It follows Charles's accession to the throne last Thursday upon the death of his mother, which in turn meant he relinquished the prince of Wales title and duchy of Cornwall estate he had held.

Those operations, formally run from the Clarence House residence, will now cease, his office confirmed, after The Guardian newspaper first reported the development on Tuesday.

"The decision of Clarence House to announce redundancies during a period of mourning is nothing short of heartless," Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), said in a statement.

"While some changes across the households were to be expected, as roles across the royal family change, the scale and speed at which this has been announced is callous in the extreme."

He added the PCS remained "committed to supporting those colleagues across the wider royal family's estates whose futures are thrown into turmoil by this announcement, at this already difficult time".

However, The Guardian noted Clarence House staff are not currently believed to have a recognised union available to them.

The move to wind down Charles' Clarence House operations follows similar steps with the households of Queen Elizabeth's mother, who died in 2002, and Charles's father Prince Philip, who passed away last year.

A spokeswoman for Clarence House said "as required by law, a consultation process" had begun following last week's accession.

"Our staff have given long and loyal service and, while some redundancies will be unavoidable, we are working urgently to identify alternative roles for the greatest possible number of staff," she added.

Royal sources said efforts were made to delay informing impacted staff until after Queen Elizabeth's funeral on Monday, but legal advice sought said that it should be shared at the earliest moment.

Any employees being made redundant will be offered "enhanced" redundancy payments and none will be affected for at least three months, according to royal sources.
White House gets involved in railroad-union negotiations


US Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh speaks at the American Rescue Plan Workforce Summit at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on July 13. Walsh is involved in railroad-union talks. 
Photo by Jemal Countess/UPI | License Photo

Sept. 13 (UPI) -- President Joe Biden and his administration have been active in the talks between railroad companies and unions in a potential strike that could derail the economy and create new supply chain headaches.

Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack have all played some role in working with all parties to push them to agreements without a work stoppage.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen as well as the SMART Transportation Division, which represents some 57,000 workers, have been engaged in negotiations with rail carriers seeking to hammer out a new contract without success. They are currently in a federally mandated "cooling off" period until Friday.

Walsh personally took part in negotiations last week while Amtrak has already announced the cancellation of three of its longest routes in anticipation of a strike. Amtrak announced it will cancel its Southwest Chief, California Zephyr and Empire Builder routes that run between Chicago and the West Coast effective Tuesday. Amtrak said it operates most of its 21,000 miles, outside the Northeast, "on track owned, maintained and dispatched by freight railroads."

Norfolk Southern said Monday that it started to close all of its gates to intermodal traffic.

"Although negotiations with the two holdout unions continue, we still do not have a commitment not to strike and must act accordingly," Norfolk Southern said in a statement Sunday. "Our goal is to ensure that in the event of a work stoppage, crews, equipment and freight safely reach their destinations with minimal disruption."

A Labor Department spokesman said Walsh is urging both parties to keep working to an agreement.


"All parties need to stay at the table, bargain in good faith to resolve outstanding issues, and come to an agreement," the spokesperson told The Hill. "The fact that we are already seeing some impacts of contingency planning by railways again demonstrates that a shutdown of our freight rail system is an unacceptable outcome for our economy and the American people, and all parties must work to avoid that."

Last week, the American Trucking Association asked Congressional leaders to intervene to prevent a walkout and "avoid debilitating and unnecessary labor disruption that could cost the country billions each day."

"While trucking and rail companies compete for ground freight, trucking is also the largest customer of the rail industry, and both industries rely on each other to keep our supply chains healthy and efficient," Chris Spear, president of American Trucking Associations, said in the letter.

The Association of American Railroads trade group warns the first national railroad strike in 30 years could cost the country $2 billion a day.

Meanwhile, the National Grain and Feed Association warned Capitol Hill that a rail strike would cause havoc in the entire economy with grain shipments coming to an end for some railroads as early as Wednesday.

"The railroads are already stopping shipments of certain commodities such as hazardous materials, chemicals, etc.," NGFA chief economist Max Fisher said, according to The Daily Scoop.com. "We're hearing grain shipments on some railroads could stop as soon as Wednesday."

Sheri Walsh contributed to this report
Facebook gives info on Myanmar war crimes, genocide, U.N. investigators say


Riot police stand guard on a road during a demonstration against the military coup in Yangon, Myanmar, on February 8, 2021. 
File Photo by Xiao Long/UPI | License Photo


Sept. 13 (UPI) -- Social media giant Facebook has turned over "millions of items" to United Nations investigators that may support charges of war crimes and genocide against Myanmar's military, a top human rights offical said.

Nicholas Koumjian, head of the U.N. Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, said Monday that posts on Facebook were among the evidence his team has collected to build cases for international courts.

"Facebook has shared with the mechanism millions of items from networks of accounts that were taken down by the company because they misrepresented their identity," Koumjian said in remarks to the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva.

The IIMM began operations three years ago to collect and preserve evidence around the August 2017 military crackdown on the Rohingya ethnic minority that forced more than 700,000 people to flee Myanmar.

The country is currently facing genocide charges in the International Court of Justice over the brutal attacks on the Rohingya, which rights groups have argued were inflamed by hate speech on Facebook.

"Our team has identified posts inciting fear and hatred of Rohingya that appeared on these military-controlled networks," Koumjian said.

He cited one post that contained "false reports of Rohingya arming en masse and threatening Myanmar's Buddhists, and a photo of a cow with its stomach slit and disemboweled -- an image offensive to Myanmar Buddhists."

Facebook parent company Meta released its first-ever human rights report in July, which concluded that "Meta had not done enough to help prevent our platform from being used to foment division and incite offline violence" in Myanmar.

Amnesty International, however, called the Meta report a "cursory and selective analysis of the company's human rights impacts," and said it failed to address fundamental issues such as the way the social media platform's algorithms amplify harmful content.

In February 2021, Myanmar's military overthrew the elected civilian government of Aung San Suu Kyi on widely debunked charges of voter fraud.

Under the junta's rule, the scope and scale of crimes against Myanmar's civilian population has intensified, Koumjian said Monday.

"Since the military coup in February last year, there is increasing evidence of crimes against humanity and war crimes, including murder, torture, deportation and forcible transfer, persecution, imprisonment and targeting of the civilian population," he said.

The IIMM released a report last month that documented its findings of atrocities by the Myanmar military, including violence against women and children.

"We have gathered reports of children in Myanmar having been tortured and arbitrarily detained, sometimes to target their parents," Koumjian said. "There is also increasing evidence of sexual and gender-based crimes against both women and men."

In July, Myanmar executed four anti-coup activists after a closed-door trial by a military tribunal, sparking widespread condemnation over the country's first use of capital punishment in decades.

"Imposing a death sentence on the basis of proceedings that do not satisfy the basic requirements of a fair trial can amount to a crime against humanity," Koumjian said.

The IIMM has prepared 67 evidential and analytical packages to share with judicial authorities, including for proceedings at the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice, he said.
NY opens immersive digital art show


Tue, September 13, 2022 at 10:47 PM·1 min read


Art lovers in New York can now enjoy an immersive digital experience with works by Gustav Klimt projected onto the walls and floors of a building that used to be a bank.

The goal, its creators say, is to bring young people and others into a 21st-century museum.

The exhibit, called "Hall des Lumières," opens Wednesday in Manhattan's Tribeca neighborhood.

It follows similar shows called "Atelier des Lumières" in Paris and "Infinity des Lumières" in Dubai.

The shows are the work of a French company called Culturespaces, which is partnering in New York with events company IMG.


Culturespaces boss Bruno Monnier said these digital art shows around the world cater to youths and anybody else who does not go to traditional venues like the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.


This nine-month show features works by Klimt and another Austrian, Friedensreich Hundertwasser.

Classical and electronic music plays as their works are projected onto every conceivable surface inside the Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, an early 20th-century building in the Beaux-Arts style.


"I do think it’s a fantastic way to introduce people to art and I think they are very complementary to great museums and art galleries of New York and in many cities around the world," said Stephen Flint Wood, Managing Director of IMG.

"You can come here in this atmosphere and be completely immersed and then go to museums and art galleries to see some paintings for yourself," he told AFP.

nr/dw/lb

What’s on your mind?

Lubna Abdel-Aziz , Tuesday 6 Sep 2022

The greatest enigma of all time has been the one particular element that makes us human.

It has fascinated and puzzled man since antiquity. Defining the concept is a slippery task and many a philosopher, scientist, mathematician, historian have slipped on its many twists and turns throughout the ages.

Consider the massive feats of the ancient Egyptians 4,000 years ago. They built pyramids, temples, statues, and drew magnificent sketches on walls and tombs in vibrant colours and meticulous details. Were they curious as to where this ability came from?

They believed the heart was the source of human wisdom. It was the one organ preserved in the corpse during mummification.

They recorded their technology on scrolls of papyrus, and the first written evidence of the word “brain” is found in hieroglyphics.

After the Egyptians came the Greeks. Hippocrates (460-375 BC) argued the brain was the seat of thought, while Aristotle (c 384-322 BC) was of the mind that the brain was a secondary organ to the heart.

The debate continued through the ages and the brain came out on top. Even contemporary scholar Sir Colin Blakemore of Oxford University, who died in June 2022, believed that the human brain is the machine which alone accounts for our actions.

What about the mind? Do we think with our brain or our mind? Herein lies the rub.

What exactly is the mind?

The relationship between mind and brain has been disputed for centuries. Many scientists believe the mind and the brain are identical. We certainly use them interchangeably. We have this intrinsic belief that the brain controls all our actions. “Use your brains” we say, when we really mean “use your mind”. Our brain does not think for us.

Mind and brain are different but inter-connected entities. The mind works through the organ in our skull, but is separate from it. The mind is separated but inseparable from the brain. The mind uses the brain — the brain responds.

We know where the brain is, what it is made of, how much it weighs, etc, but what about the mind? Where is it? What is it? What are its physical properties?

It has none. The mind occurs, exists, and functions with the brain. They are a unity.

It was about 500 years ago that French philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes (1596-1650) is credited with the first definition of the mind. Conscious was the distinction.

Unlike the brain, it has no physical characteristics and occupies no space.

Our bodies occupy space. Our mind does not.

What is your mind? It is a hard question to answer, but if pressed you may describe it as the part of yourself that makes you who you are: your emotions, your consciousness, your dreams, your memories. A triad of thinking, feeling, and choosing.

Cogito, ergo sum: I think, therefore I am. That is the legacy of Descartes, the simple definition of the mind. This is what makes us human beings.

There are animals that have some ability to think, but logic and reason are man’s exclusivity.

The question arises if we are using the capacity of our mind/brain to the fullest. There is a sort of myth going around among quasi-psychologists that we are only using less than 10 per cent of our brain’s capacity.

Neurologist Barry Gordon and John Henley of the Mayo Clinic refute the 10 per cent myth. “Evidence would show over a day you use 100 per cent of the brain,” concludes Henley. Gordon supports this conclusion adding: “We are virtually using every part of the brain and most of the brain is active all the time.”

It is a fact that human beings seem to be hardwired for laziness. A new study shows that our brains may be wired to prefer lying on the couch. We are attracted to sedentary behaviour; that is the majority and not the gym addicts. Get off that couch.

Neuroscience is on the edge of new discoveries about the mind that, if true, will put humans on an even higher strata. In his best-seller Journey to the Heart of Being Human, psychiatrist Daniel Siegel of UCLA School of Medicine suggests that “our mind cannot be confused with what’s in our skull or our body.”

Our mind extends beyond ourselves. Meaning what?

The mind is not simply a perception of conscious, information and experience as previously thought. It is those experiences. “Thoughts, feelings, memories that you experience in this subjective world is part of your mind.”

Does that imply its independence from the brain? How? We just stated they are inseparable. If the brain dies, the mind of the being to whom it belonged dies too, right?

Siegel suggests there may be more to our mental life than what the brain does. Shocked? Many scientists agree.

This was first proposed by Islamic philosopher Avicenna (980-1037) who believed that with brain death, reason, memory and consciousness continue.

This is chilling.

Peter Fenwick, a highly regarded neuro-physicist, spent 50 years researching brain death. He concluded that consciousness exists after the brain dies.

Rupert Sheldrake, morphogenesis specialist, explains that “the mind is not the brain.”

But, we just got through our thesis of how inseparable they are.

Ah well. That was yesterday. Science changes from day to day.

So where are we now? A new theory of the quantum family.

A subject for another day.

*A version of this article appears in print in the 8 September, 2022 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly.

The ozone layer is slowly getting healthier

Ozone-killing materials in Earth's stratosphere fell over 50% to levels seen before the ozone hole became a problem, scientists say. But there's still a way to go. Here's why we need a healthy ozone layer.

The health of the ozone layer has improved but scientists say there is still a large hole over the Antarctic

It's not much — but the ozone layer is all there is between you and UV.

As the United Nations puts it, "if we could bring the entire ozone layer to sea level, it would be only about 3mm [0.118 inches] thick. That's what protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation."

That really isn't very much, is it — just 3mm of protection? You can't even see it.

And in some regions of the stratosphere, the ozone is so depleted that we refer to an "ozone hole." In fact, we have known for decades that the ozone layer is itself under threat and needs our protection.

The UN has been working to repair the hole for three decades via international treaties such as the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

According to meteorologists at the US-based National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in early 2022, the amount of ozone-killing materials in our stratosphere had fallen by 50% to levels last seen before the ozone hole became a problem.

But we still have a way to go before the ozone layer has healed. Here's our brief guide to what you need to know about our very precious ozone.

What is the ozone layer?

Ozone is a molecule, consisting of three oxygen atoms (O3). Ozone molecules occur naturally in the upper atmosphere — known as the stratosphere — and form a layer of gas. This layer of gas protects life on Earth by filtering some (but not all) of the sun's ultraviolet radiation.

Ozone is also created by chemical reactions between air pollutants and other emissions in the lower atmosphere — the troposphere.

While ozone provides us with a protective shield in the stratosphere, direct contact in the troposphere can be harmful to plants, animals and humans.


So, what's the problem with ultraviolet radiation (UV)?

It is often said we need the ozone layer to stop UV radiation from "sterilizing" the Earth's surface.

We know that sun rays do have the power to sterilize things, and that can be good — think about your washing drying on the line on a hot summer's day. But what we really mean to say is that UV radiation can kill.

There are three types of UV radiation: A, B and C.

The ozone layer and atmosphere absorb all of the UVC — the most energetic form of UV radiation — and some UVB. UVA is not absorbed by the ozone layer and reaches the Earth's surface in its entirety.

Humans need UVB radiation to generate vitamin D, which is good for people in appropriate doses. But too much UVB and UVA can cause serious illnesses, such as skin cancer, cataracts, suppression of the immune system, and premature aging of the skin. An excess of UV is also linked with reduced crop yields and adverse effects in the marine food chain.

What causes ozone depletion?

To a large extent, humans cause ozone depletion through our use of "ozone depleting substances" (ODSs). 

Gases such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, CH3CCl3 (Methyl chloroform), CCI4 (Carbon tetrachloride), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and methyl bromide destroy the ozone layer.

These substances can be found in refrigerators, air conditioners, aerosols, solvents and pesticides, to name a few.

They deplete the ozone layer by releasing chlorine and bromine atoms, which degrade ozone molecules in the stratosphere.

\

Parts of the Rhone Glacier in the Swiss Alps, pictured here, are covered

 with white, UV-resistant blankets to protect it against melting

Scientists warn that "very short-lived substances" (VSLSs) also threaten the ozone layer. VSLSs occur naturally in marine life, among seaweed and phytoplankton. But we also produce human-made VSLSs, such as dichloromethane.

The ozone hole — it's not really a hole, is it?

No, strictly speaking, there is no ozone "hole" — rather, there is a region of "exceptionally depleted ozone over the Antarctic." It is also referred to as a "dramatic thinning" of ozone, which shows up during spring in the southern hemisphere (August-October).

There are "mini-holes" and other aberrations in the northern hemisphere, too.

Will the ozone layer ever heal completely?

Scientists say the future looks good for the ozone layer. It may recover to pre-1980 levels over the next 50 years — sometime between 2050 and 2065 — if we stick to goals set in international treaties.

The Vienna Convention and the Montreal Protocol, for instance, became the first treaties in the history of the UN to achieve universal ratification on September 16, 2009. And September 16 is now commonly known as World Ozone Day, or the International Day for the Preservation of the Ozone Layer.

NASA's Ozone Watch provides daily updates, including images and animations from 1979 to 2022.

Edited by: Zulfikar Abbany

DW RECOMMENDS

Italy and Spain waking up to women's football

The Italian and Spanish leagues have lagged behind others in western Europe, until very recently. Italy's top flight is now professionalized while Spain are breaking records. But a referees' strike is a black cloud.

The arrival of Icelandic midfielder Sara Bjork Gunnarsdottir in Italy is a sign of changing times

Italy stop dragging their feet

For a long time, conservative Italy has sat and watched as the other major western European powers have experienced a growth in women's football. Now that there may be money to be made, they're in a hurry. This season sees the start of a fully professional league, which is more than can be said for the German Bundesliga. "Foreign players are now interested in coming here," Juventus coach Joe Montemurro said, while his captain Lisa Boattin spoke of how long it had taken to win the financial battle.

The increasingly international flavor of the league was apparent in the spectacular headline match of the second round of fixtures, a 3-3 draw between Juve and Inter. Former Bayern forward Lineth Beerensteyn (Netherlands) scored twice while the arrival of Iceland international Sara Bjork Gunnarsdottir from Lyon at Juve is another sign of that club's growing stature. The scorer of two of Inter's goals, Tabitha Chawinga, is from Malawi and on loan from China.

With the national team having just qualified for a second successive World Cup after a disappointing Euros, some critics are starting to be appeased. The new money, provided by private investors, is increasing competition, while the league has been reduced to 10 teams. It was possible to buy participation, which meant Empoli’s place was taken by Parma, a former third division club, financed by a board member of a US supermarket chain. "When an opportunity arises, you have to seize it," said club owner Kyle Krause, who has been a strong advocate for more equal distribution of money in Italian (men's) football.

Nevertheless, in Empoli several fan groups protested against the subsequent disbanding of their women's team. In an open letter, they spoke of a lack of interest within the club and of purely economic motives for the sale, suggesting there wasn't a lack of time to raise money, more a lack of will. In Parma, at least, the will is present. There, fans of the men can now also visit the women's games free of charge with their season ticket. 

While professionalization is perceived by many to be the only way for women’s football to progress, there’s also little doubt that it opens the door wider to financial, rather than sporting, interests. There is also the potential for the distance between players and fans to become greater. Is there a better model for the women’s game?

Spain splash the cash

Whenever there have been records to report in women's football recently, they have always gone to England: the highest TV deal, the highest transfer fee, the only professional league on the continent. But the balance of power is changing this year. The Spanish league has just signed a five-year deal worth €35 million ($34.9 million) with digital broadcaster DAZN, and has also announced a professional league in the form of Liga F. The new league's slogan: "Football without an F is not the same" is not bad at all. And it is certainly not insignificant that an Englishwoman has been lured to Spain for a world record fee.

Euros-winning midfielder Keira Walsh has moved from Manchester City to Barcelona for €460,000. A little warning shot from Liga F to the WSL. Her club and international teammate Lucy Bronze made the same move ahead of the Euros. Thanks to plenty of hard work, the Spanish have gone from also rans to the second best league in Europe. They may soon surpass that.

But right now, however, there is a black mark. The first matchday of Liga F was postponed because of a referees' strike. "We are sad and frustrated. We worked for many months, but in the end there was a lack of respect," said league president Beatriz Alvarez.

But where is the real lack of respect? The referees are fighting for professional contracts and higher salaries. They argue it is not a true professional league when referees only make €320 and assistants €160 per game.

When the strike was announced last Thursday, ahead of the start of the competition, the referees and assistant referees released a statement saying:

"The referees want to provide the best possible service to football and that necessarily means having minimum working conditions comparable to this of the refereeing establishment of the men's professional competition."

However, Alvarez took issue with the Spanish football association, adding: "The Spanish soccer federation has from the very start tried to boycott the professional women’s league and the Higher Sports Council has allowed it to do so."

A complex situation. Industrial disputes cannot simply be dismissed with a reference to solidarity. And women's leagues continue to face obstacles.

William Ruto: From 'hustler' to Kenya's newest president

William Samoei Ruto has politically outsmarted veteran opposition leader Raila Odinga to become Kenya's fifth leader since independence. DW digs into his journey from selling chickens on a highway to the presidency.

For 55-year-old President William Samoei Ruto, clinching Kenya's top job was difficult. After all, the outspoken politician has defied all odds, including a rebuff from his former boss President Uhuru Kenyatta, to ascend to the country's highest office. 

Wafula Chebukati, the chairman of Kenya’s Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), said that Ruto had won almost 7.18 million votes (50.49%) against 6.94 million (48.85%) for his rival Raila Odinga in the August 9 vote.

The announcement came on the heels of a statement by the IEBC's deputy chairperson and three other commissioners disowning the election results.

"We cannot take ownership of the result that will be announced," Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) vice chair Juliana Cherera told reporters, saying the process was "opaque".

William Ruto overcame a tough battle with Raila Odinga to become Kenya's president

 A protest that remained without concrete consequences, but which political observers believe will continue to cause political conflict in the East African country.

Transforming Kenya

The outgoing president backed Ruto's main rival, opposition leader Raila Odinga. But even that was not enough to stop the "hustler nation" — a term Ruto coined to refer to most of Kenya's informal sector workers. 

Ruto has pledged to implement a new bottom-up economic model. But how precisely that will work remains to be seen.

His party's manifesto also calls for drastic economic changes to help the less fortunate. In addition, Ruto has promised to create a cabinet that is equally split between men and women. 

In a recent interview with DW, Ruto spoke of his plan to transform the agricultural sector to ensure food security.

"Agriculture is the most important sector that we have in Kenya ... There is absolutely no reason why we cannot produce enough food. There is no reason why 4 million Kenyans are starving," he said.

Ruto enjoyed massive support from President Kenyatta's central region

Humble beginnings

William Ruto was born on December 21, 1966, in Sambut Village, Kamagut, Uasin Gishu County. He completed his elementary schooling at Kerotet Primary School. He later attended Wareng Secondary School before transferring to Nandi County's Kapsabet Boys High School.

In 1990, he graduated in Botany and Zoology from the University of Nairobi, where he would later earn his Ph.D.

A confessed Christian, Ruto, met the late President Daniel Arap Moi during a church event. Moi is credited for exposing Ruto to Kenyan politics in 1992, following the country's move to multi-party democracy.

His humble beginnings — Ruto says he sold live chickens to make ends meet in his youth — seemed to have resonated well with the Kenyan voters, who currently have to deal with the rising cost of living.

But President Ruto is a different person from the boy who got his first pair of shoes at the age of 15. Today, Ruto is one of the wealthiest Kenyans, boasting a 2,500-acre ranch, a massive poultry farm, and investments in the hotel industry.  

Many young unemployed Kenyans identified with Ruto's humble background

Political rise, fall, and rise again

Ruto launched his political career through the Youth for KANU '92 lobby, which supported late President Daniel Arap Moi, the president, during Kenya's first multi-party elections in 1992.

After the defeat of KANU in 2002, Ruto reinvented himself and later partnered with Odinga during the disputed 2007 elections, which turned violent.

The post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives and displaced hundreds of thousands of others. As a result, the International Criminal Court (ICC) indicted Ruto and Kenyatta, accusing the two of committing human rights abuses. However, the ICC dropped its charges in 2016.

Raila Odinga's fifth presidential defeat most likely seals his political ambitions

Feud with Uhuru Kenyatta

At The Hague, Ruto and Uhuru bonded and would later bid for the presidency — Kenyatta as the candidate and Ruto as his deputy — in 2013. They won that vote against Raila Odinga, which would make this loss more painful for Odinga.

In 2017, he and incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta were running mates for a second time and were re-elected again.

The two then started to fall out in what was still not clear. Ruto and Kenyatta parted ways in 2021, and he was endorsed in March by the UDA party to contest the presidential vote.

William Ruto has been Kenya's deputy president since 2013. He has previously served as minister of home affairs, minister of agriculture, and minister of higher education.

Ruto is married to Rachel Chebet, and the two have seven children.

Edited by Keith Walker