Tuesday, July 29, 2025

 

How does the immune system prepare for breastfeeding?



Salk researchers find immune cells travel from the gut to the mammary gland to support lactation



Salk Institute

Authors 

image: 

From left: Abigail Jaquish and Deepshika Ramanan.

view more 

Credit: Salk Institute





LA JOLLA (July 29, 2025)—Of the 3.6 million babies born in the United States each year, around 80 percent begin breastfeeding in their first month of life. Breastfeeding has known benefits for both mother and child, reducing maternal risk of breast and ovarian cancers, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure, while simultaneously supporting the baby’s nutrition and immune system. But because pregnancy and lactation have been historically understudied, we still don’t understand the science behind many of these benefits.

Salk Institute immunologists are changing that—starting with a map of immune cell migration before and during lactation. Using both animal research and human milk and tissue samples, the researchers discovered that immune cells called T cells are abundant in the mammary glands during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with some relocating from the gut. These cells likely support both maternal and infant health.

The findings, published in Nature Immunology on July 29, 2025, may help explain the advantages of breastfeeding, prompt new solutions for mothers unable to breastfeed, and inform dietary decisions that enhance breast milk production and quality.

“By investigating how immune cells change during pregnancy and lactation, we were able to find lots of exciting things—notably, that there’s a significant increase in immune cells in mammary tissue during lactation, and the increase in immune cells requires microbes,” says Assistant Professor Deepshika Ramanan, senior author of the study.

What we know: Babies get gut bacteria and antibodies from mother’s milk

Most breastfeeding studies focus on the relationship between milk content and infant health. These studies, including previous work by Ramanan, have shown that babies receive important gut bacteria and antibodies from their mother through the breast milk, which lays a critical foundation for their developing immune system. Still, much less is known about the changes to the mother’s body during this time.

Some features of the mammary gland immune landscape can be inferred from milk content research. For example, the presence of antibodies in breast milk means that antibody-producing immune cells called B cells must be present. But few have looked directly at immune cell activity within the mammary gland itself.

What’s new: Mom’s gut microbes boost immune cells in mammary glands

“What’s really exciting is that we didn’t just find more T cells in mammary glands, we found that some of these T cells were actually coming from the gut,” says first author Abigail Jaquish, a graduate student researcher in Ramanan’s lab. “We think they are likely supporting mammary tissue in the same way they typically support intestinal tissue.”

The researchers began their study by looking at mouse mammary gland tissues at various stages pre- to post-lactation. By comparing these samples, they discovered that three different types of T cells were growing in number: CD4+, CD8αα+, and CD8αβ+ T cells.

This was curious to the team, because these T cell subtypes are members of a special immune cell class called intraepithelial lymphocytes. Intraepithelial lymphocytes live in mucosal tissues—soft tissues like the intestines or lungs that are exposed to substances from the outside world. Because these tissues are more vulnerable, intraepithelial lymphocytes act as “resident" immune cells, stationed on-site and ready for action.

The researchers noticed these CD4+, CD8αα+, and CD8αβ+ T cells were lining the mammary epithelium the same way they would line the epithelium of other mucosal tissues. What’s more, these T cell subtypes bore gut-resident surface protein fingerprints—pointing to T cell migration between the intestines and mammary glands. Together, these changes were facilitating a mammary gland transition from non-mucosal to mucosal tissue in preparation for lactation, where it would become exposed to the outside environment, including microbes from the mother’s skin and the infant’s mouth.

But was this also happening in humans? An investigation into databases of human breast tissue and milk samples from the Human Milk Institute at UC San Diego revealed yes—human equivalents of these intraepithelial lymphocytes showed the same trends.

The team returned to the mouse model with one final question: Are these mammary gland T cells impacted by microbes the same way they would be in the gut? They compared the mammary glands of mice living in normal and germ-free environments and found that all three T cells subtypes were expressed far more in mice exposed to microbes. This finding suggests that maternal microbes modulate the number of T cells created during lactation, which in turn could impact the strength of the mammary gland immune barrier.

Altogether, T cell production ramped up with the help of microbes, T cells relocated from the gut to mammary glands, and the mammary glands switched from non-mucosal to mucosal tissues.

Looking ahead: What affects this gut-breast immune axis, and thus influences our health for generations?

“We now know so much more about how the maternal immune system is changing during this critical time,” says Ramanan, “and we can now use this information to start exploring the direct effects of these immune cells on both maternal and infant health.”

The researchers hypothesize that hormones influence these many changes, and that the overall goal is protecting the mother from the outside world and related infection. But how they influence lactogenesis, milk quality, and maternal and baby health is the next case to crack.

“There’s so much more research to be done in this area—we’re just getting started,” adds Jaquish. “If we’re seeing a connection between the gut and the mammary gland, what other interactions might be happening in the body? And what else could be impacting the milk that we’re passing on to our offspring?”

Understanding maternal immune cell changes during pregnancy and lactation can impact generations, as mother to child immune and microbiome transfers occur again and again. The insights may also lead to solutions for mothers who cannot breastfeed, either with therapies that help support natural milk production or with more sophisticated formulas that provide some of the same immune support. As the connection between the gut and mammary gland becomes clearer, scientists could one day suggest diets to promote mammary and maternal health, as well as optimize milk quality.

Other authors include Eleni Phung and Isabelle Bursulaya of Salk; Xutong Gong, Silvia Galvan-Pena, Ian Magill, Diane Mathis, and Christophe Benoist of Harvard Medical School; Pilar Baldominos, Eleonara Marina, and Judith Agudo of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Kerri Bertrand and Christina Chambers of UC San Diego; Andrés R. Muñoz-Rojas of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; and ImmgenT consortium members.

The work was supported by the Damon Runyon Dale F. Frey Award, UC San Diego PiBS T32, National Institutes of Health (RO1-AI150686, R24-072073, NCI CCSG P30 CA014195, NIA San Diego Nathan Shock Center P30 AG068635, NCI CCSG: P30 CA01495, S10 OD023689, S10 OD034268), Chapman Foundation, and Helmsley Charitable Trust.

About the Salk Institute for Biological Studies:

Unlocking the secrets of life itself is the driving force behind the Salk Institute. Our team of world-class, award-winning scientists pushes the boundaries of knowledge in areas such as neuroscience, cancer research, aging, immunobiology, plant biology, computational biology, and more. Founded by Jonas Salk, developer of the first safe and effective polio vaccine, the Institute is an independent, nonprofit research organization and architectural landmark: small by choice, intimate by nature, and fearless in the face of any challenge. Learn more at www.salk.edu.

Virgin (left) and lactating (right) mouse mammary gland imaging shows the dramatic structural changes that occur to facilitate milk production including cell proliferation and the formation of milk ducts.

Credit

Salk Institute

 

A twangy timbre cuts through the noise



Among loud noise, a brassy and bright voice can help speakers be understood




American Institute of Physics

Twangy, female voices are best understood amongst plane and train sounds 

image: 

A study by Tsai et al. showed that twangy, female voices are best understood amongst plane and train sounds. Credit: AIP

view more 

Credit: A study by Tsai et al. showed that twangy, female voices are best understood amongst plane and train sounds. Credit: AIP





WASHINGTON, July 29, 2025 — Twangy voices are a hallmark of country music and many regional accents. However, this speech type, often described as “brassy” and “bright,” can also be used to get a message across in a noisy environment.

In JASA Express Letters, published on behalf of the Acoustical Society of America by AIP Publishing, researchers from Indiana University found that it was easier to understand twangy female voices compared to neutral voices when surrounded by noise.

Found in accents in American cities such as Chicago, Boston, New York, and Dallas, “twangy” voices are used by speech pathologists to help increase their understandability when working with patients.

“While the acoustic properties of twangy voice have been studied for their potential to enhance intelligibility, the perceptual effect of twangy timbre on speech intelligibility is not well understood,” said author Tzu-Pei Tsai. “This lack of evidence has led to clinicians' hesitance in recommending a twangy voice for therapy, and the major motivation for our study is so we can provide speech-language pathologists with the confidence to use this tool.”

To explore this, the researchers recruited four male and four female participants to record twangy speech samples, which they then used to create a text-to-speech system that could be used in the experiments. The generated speech samples were then played over noisy environment sounds, which were created from ambient train and plane recordings.

Participants listened to both male and female twangy speakers and neutral speakers, then rated their listening efforts and how well they could understand the spoken words. The researchers found that in general, twangy voices were understood more than neutral voices, but participants had the easiest time understanding twangy female voices.

This could arise thanks to a few reasons — firstly, twangy speech is usually higher-pitched than neutral speech, giving it a perceived loudness. It is also less masked by low-frequency sounds such as traffic noises.

In the future, the researchers want to explore the impact of twangy speech on intelligibility in different noise environments.

“We would also like to explore the clinical applicability of twang in voice therapy, including its social perception and the effort required for its production,” Tsai said.

###

The article “How vocal timbre impacts word identification and listening effort in traffic-shaped noises” is authored by Tzu-Pei Tsai, Tessa Bent, and Malachi Henry. It will appear in JASA Express Letters on July 29, 2025 (DOI: 10.1121/10.0037043). After that date, it can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0037043.

ABOUT THE JOURNAL

JASA Express Letters is a gold open-access journal devoted to the rapid and open dissemination of important new research results and technical discussion in all fields of acoustics. It serves physical scientists, life scientists, engineers, psychologists, physiologists, architects, musicians, and speech communication specialists who wish to quickly report the results of their acoustical research in letter-sized contributions. See https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jel.

ABOUT ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA

The Acoustical Society of America (ASA) is the premier international scientific society in acoustics devoted to the science and technology of sound. Its 7,000 members worldwide represent a broad spectrum of the study of acoustics. ASA publications include The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (the world's leading journal on acoustics), JASA Express Letters, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustics Today magazine, books, and standards on acoustics. The society also holds two major scientific meetings each year. See https://acousticalsociety.org/.

###

 

Trends in medical and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among US adolescents




JAMA Network




About The Study: 

Among U.S. adolescents, current medical use of prescription stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increased between 2005 and 2023, while nonmedical use decreased. Lifetime nonmedical use was more prevalent than medical use in early cohorts but shifted to being less prevalent in recent cohorts. These findings are consistent with declines in peer-to-peer diversion among adolescents following COVID-related school closures and findings from adult studies. 



Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Sean Esteban McCabe, PhD, email plius@umich.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2025.11260)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2025.11260?guestAccessKey=87ddd01c-0025-4ed0-b942-f77db5009ac8&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=072925

 

 

Physical inactivity crisis costing US $192 billion annually, new study reveals



Crisis-level costs demand urgent change in healthcare, workplace, and community systems



Physical Activity Alliance





WASHINGTON, D.C. – A new study published in the American Journal of Health Promotion finds that inadequate leisure-time aerobic physical activity accounts for $192 billion in annual healthcare costs among U.S. adults—12.6% of total national health care spending.

Researchers analyzed data from more than 76,000 adults between 2012 and 2019. The findings are stark:

  • 52.4% of adults met aerobic activity guidelines
     
  • 20.4% were insufficiently active
     
  • 27.3% were completely inactive
     
  • The average adult incurred $6,566 in annual healthcare costs
     

Compared to active adults:

  • Insufficiently active adults incurred $1,355 more than active adults in annual health care costs.
  • Completely inactive adults incurred $2,025 more per year.

“Aerobic physical activity is an investment in health—it strengthens the heart, reduces chronic disease burdens, and empowers us to live with energy and freedom,” said one of the study’s co-authors, Dr. Adam Chen, of the University of Georgia’s College of Public Health.

Despite modest national gains in physical activity, health care costs continue to rise, largely driven by preventable chronic conditions. The consequences are being felt across sectors.

“These findings provide further economic reasons for health systems, payers, and clinicians to integrate physical activity assessment, prescription, and referral into health care delivery,” said co-author Laurie Whitsel, PhD, National Vice President of Policy Research at the American Heart Association and Senior Advisor to the national Physical Activity Alliance. “We need to inspire and support people to make physical activity a regular part of their day.”

Co-author Jennifer Matjasko, PhD, of the CDC’s Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, underscored the power of a simple solution hiding in plain sight. “Moving more throughout the day can help improve health and reduce health care costs,” she said. “Every step counts toward a healthier future.”

The Physical Activity Alliance, the nation’s largest coalition advancing physical activity policy and systems change, is calling for immediate cross-sector action:

  • Make physical activity a standard of care in health care. It must be assessed, tracked, and, where necessary, prescribed—just as blood pressure or cholesterol are assessed and tracked, and addressed with prescriptions when needed.
     
  • Redesign workplaces to make movement the norm. Sedentary work culture is accelerating chronic disease.
     
  • Transform communities through policies that make physical activity safe, easy, and unavoidable—where people live, learn, work, and play.

“We’re spending nearly one out of every eight health care dollars on something we can prevent,” said Michael Stack, ACSM-EP, President of the Physical Activity Alliance. “We need to view physical activity as an essential health care solution to inspire people to move across their day in recreation, to and from work, in their jobs, at home and in schools.” 

About the Physical Activity Alliance

The Physical Activity Alliance (PAA) is the nation’s largest coalition dedicated to advancing regular participation in physical activity. We use our collective voice to lead efforts that create, support, and advocate for the policy and systems changes necessary to empower people to enjoy physically active lives. We are leading the movement to make physical activity more accessible, frequent, and integrated into the day-to-day lives and health of all people. To learn more, visit https://paamovewithus.org.

Contact:
Ayanna McKnight
moreactive@paamovewithus.org

 

                                                                                           

 

How tomatoes fight fertilizer stress—one protein at a time




Nanjing Agricultural University The Academy of Science

A schematic illustration of SlTrxh positively regulates nitrate stress tolerance through S-nitrosation in tomato. 

image: 

A schematic illustration of SlTrxh positively regulates nitrate stress tolerance through S-nitrosation in tomato. In the SlTrxh overexpression plants, SlMYB86 directly binds to the promoter of SlTrxh, thereby activating its expression. The NO accumulation and the S-nitrosation of SlTrxh were induced under nitrate stress, with Cys54 identified as a crucial site for this process. The S-nitrosation enhances the interaction between SlTrxh and SlGrx9, thereby improving tomato’s resistance to nitrate stress with lower ROS accumulation. While in the SlTrxh RNAi plants, the expression and S-nitrosated level of SlTrxh was reduced and the interaction of SlTrxh and SlGrx9 was lower than overexpression plants under nitrate stress with more ROS accumulation.

view more 

Credit: Horticulture Research





Tomato plants are increasingly vulnerable to nitrate-induced stress caused by modern agricultural practices. A new study has identified the gene SlTrxh as a crucial defender against this challenge. When overexpressed, SlTrxh helps tomato seedlings manage excessive nitrate by reducing oxidative stress and boosting antioxidant responses. Its activity depends on a chemical process called S-nitrosation, particularly at a key cysteine site. Researchers also discovered that the transcription factor SlMYB86 acts upstream, directly activating SlTrxh. Together, this molecular partnership forms a powerful defense circuit, enabling tomatoes to thrive under environmental stress. The findings offer valuable insights for breeding more resilient crops in nitrate-affected regions.

Nitrogen is essential for plant development, but the widespread overuse of nitrate-based fertilizers in greenhouse agriculture has created unintended consequences—soil degradation, environmental runoff, and weakened crop quality. Tomatoes, like many vegetables, suffer oxidative stress under nitrate overload, leading to stunted growth and cellular damage. Plants rely on antioxidant systems to survive these conditions, but the genetic regulators driving this resilience remain incompletely understood. Among these, thioredoxins have emerged as redox-sensitive proteins central to plant stress responses. Yet the specific role and regulatory mechanisms of SlTrxh under nitrate stress have remained elusive. Due to these pressing challenges, a deeper exploration of tomato’s molecular stress defenses was urgently needed.

A research team from Kunming University of Science and Technology and partner institutions has unveiled a genetic mechanism that boosts tomato tolerance to nitrate stress. Their findings, published (DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae184) on July 10, 2024, in Horticulture Research, show that the gene SlTrxh acts as a stress-response regulator whose activity is fine-tuned through S-nitrosation. The study also identified SlMYB86 as a transcription factor that activates SlTrxh expression, forming a two-tiered control system. Using gene editing, protein interaction assays, and stress simulations, the researchers constructed a robust picture of how tomato seedlings fight back against nitrate excess.

The team engineered tomato plants to either overexpress or suppress SlTrxh and exposed them to high-nitrate conditions. Overexpression lines exhibited significantly better growth, longer roots, and reduced oxidative damage, while RNAi lines performed poorly. These plants also showed differing levels of antioxidant enzymes, linking SlTrxh to redox regulation. Crucially, the researchers found that SlTrxh function relies on S-nitrosation—a nitric oxide–driven protein modification—centered on the amino acid cysteine-54. Mutating this residue diminished the plant’s stress tolerance. The team further uncovered that SlTrxh interacts with another protein, SlGrx9, and that this interaction is strengthened by S-nitrosation. Upstream, they identified SlMYB86 as a transcription factor that binds directly to the SlTrxh promoter. When SlMYB86 was overexpressed, tomato plants showed enhanced nitrate tolerance and increased SlTrxh expression; conversely, knockout lines were more vulnerable. These interconnected molecular pathways suggest a sophisticated stress-resistance mechanism controlled by both genetic and redox regulation.

“Our findings shed light on a dynamic molecular defense system in tomatoes,” said Dr. Huini Xu, senior author of the study. “By uncovering how SlMYB86 triggers SlTrxh and how S-nitrosation fine-tunes its activity, we reveal a precise regulatory loop that could be leveraged to improve crop resilience. This dual-layered control system not only reduces cellular damage but also enhances plant vitality under nitrate stress—offering a blueprint for next-generation crop engineering.”

This discovery opens new possibilities for developing tomato varieties that can withstand high-nitrate conditions without compromising growth or quality. Through genetic manipulation of SlMYB86 and SlTrxh, plant breeders may enhance redox balance and improve stress tolerance. Beyond tomatoes, the redox-based regulatory model may apply to other horticultural and staple crops frequently exposed to excessive fertilization. As climate change and food demand intensify the strain on agricultural systems, this research contributes a timely solution to promote sustainable farming and nutrient-efficient cultivation.

###

References

DOI

10.1093/hr/uhae184

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae184

Funding information

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32260753, 31760582) and the Yunnan Ten Thousand Talents Plan: Young & Elite Talents Project.

About Horticulture Research

Horticulture Research is an open access journal of Nanjing Agricultural University and ranked number one in the Horticulture category of the Journal Citation Reports ™ from Clarivate, 2023. The journal is committed to publishing original research articles, reviews, perspectives, comments, correspondence articles and letters to the editor related to all major horticultural plants and disciplines, including biotechnology, breeding, cellular and molecular biology, evolution, genetics, inter-species interactions, physiology, and the origination and domestication of crops.

 

PTSD costs the UK economy £40 billion a year, new research says




University of Birmingham

New research into the economic impact of Post-traumatic stress disorder has found that average annual costs exceed £14780 per person, which at current prevalence rates equates to £40 billion. 

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a significant anxiety disorder that can be triggered as a result of witnessing or experiencing a traumatic event or events. It is estimated that across the UK military and civilian population, 4% of people – or 2,612,000 individuals – have PTSD, with a total of 6,665,000 people expected to develop PTSD at some point in their life.

Despite increased awareness of mental health conditions and the increased prevalence of PTSD, the disorder continues to be misunderstood, misdiagnosed and stigmatised, and the cost to the UK economy has been unknown.

Now, new research from the University of Birmingham has found that the economic and societal burden of PTSD in the UK is far greater than previously understood.

The research was funded by Supporting Wounded Veterans and The Veterans Foundation, and published in BMJ Open.

Paul Montgomery, Professor of Social Intervention at the University of Birmingham, said: “Health and well-being can have significant impacts not only on individuals’ economic situations, but also on the wider UK economy. Appointments, treatment, missed work and other related issues can all add up quickly. The impact that poor mental health can have on the economy has been recognised by successive governments, with various pledges being made to reduce this cost. But, now for the first time, we have a more detailed and current picture of what part of that previously unknown cost is when it comes to PTSD.”

The researchers analysed databases for different types of quantitative data that evaluated the direct and indirect economic and societal costs related to PTSD from 1990-2023.

Direct costs included hospital (inpatient beds), medication, general practitioner/doctors, treatment for alcohol and/or substance abuse, psychiatrists, psychologists, and counsellor costs.

Indirect costs include homelessness, disability living allowance, unemployment allowance, productivity loss at work (absenteeism and presenteeism), home-care workers, social workers (mental health), and premature mortality.

The researchers found that the annual average direct excess costs for a patient with PTSD in the UK is approximately £1,118, whilst the average indirect cost is £13,663 per year, totalling £14,781, with a range from around £11,373 to £16,797. Based on the prevalence figures for PTSD, this comes out at an average annual cost to the UK economy of £40 billion.

Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Professor of Economics, explained: “Despite this detailed breakdown of costs and this high figure, there are other factors that may add further costs which we are not able to provide figures for. It is incredibly hard to measure the cost of stigma and discrimination, which could lead to reduced income and a higher dependence on social security assistance. There may also be an increased cost relating to criminal justice, relationship and family support services, and education. This suggests that the actual costs of PTSD on the economy may well exceed that £40 billion figure.”

The researchers also acknowledge that PTSD is often present with other mental health conditions, so disentangling one condition from the other is difficult, and the severity of PTSD can vary from person to person.

Professor Montgomery concluded: “PTSD affects millions of people in the UK, and as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is anticipated that there will be a rise of 77,000 cases per year. This presents even more demand for social and economic services and further increases in the associated costs.

“If the government is serious about reducing the cost of poor mental health and well-being on the economy, then collecting high-quality and accurate cost data, developing more effective therapies and expanding evidence-based interventions for PTSD should be a key part of that plan.”

ENDS

 

Poor health scores for England's rivers mask biodiversity improvements, experts tell Defra



Review of Water Framework Directive proposes alternative monitoring standard


UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

River 

image: 

The Water Framework Directive scores for rivers mask improvements in biodiversity, says the review.

view more 

Credit: UKCEH





    The system for assessing the health of England’s rivers states just 14% are in good ecological health but an independent report for Defra says this masks improvements in freshwater biodiversity – and has proposed an alternative monitoring standard.

    A team of scientists, led by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), carried out a review of the ecological status assessments of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), and criticised its ‘one out, all out’ approach. This prevents a waterbody being awarded ‘good ecological status’ if concentrations of a single element, such as a chemical, are above the threshold – even though it also receives a separate chemical status. 

    The Cunliffe report, published on 21 July, said the UK Government should consider the review’s recommendations, which include a proposed regular biodiversity audit that could be introduced fairly quickly and run alongside the WFD.

    A variety of chemical pollutants from agriculture, industry, wastewater and roads find their way into rivers, lakes and other waterbodies. But the authors of the review point out that analyses of a wealth of Environment Agency sampling data show there have been important improvements in the species richness of invertebrates, plants, fish and benthic (bottom-dwelling) algae in rivers over recent decades.

    The scientists say a biodiversity audit would more clearly reveal the status of different species at any given location, informing local people. It would be supported by statistical analysis of associated monitoring data on chemical concentrations, habitat quality, water temperature and flow to clearly identify what elements might be suppressing biodiversity.

    Providing a clearer picture

    While the WFD assessments are revealed every six years, the statistical analysis would be carried out every year based on the Environment Agency sampling data. This would provide a clearer and simpler picture of how human activities are affecting wildlife, thereby supporting what the scientists say should be the desired outcome – improvements in biodiversity.

    Previous UKCEH analyses of Environment Agency data have shown increases in diversity of freshwater invertebrates correlate with reductions in metal pollution and improvements in wastewater treatment over the last 30 years.

    Professor Andrew Johnson, an environmental scientist at UKCEH, who led the review. said: “There has been no increase in the number of waterbodies achieving good ecological status, which might appear to imply there have been no improvements for wildlife since full reporting for the Water Framework Directive began in 2009. This is not the case, and the disconnect between the scientific evidence and the ecological status results brings into question the value of the whole process.

    “For example, the WFD would direct us to put a lot more money into further reducing phosphate concentrations, yet according to our statistical analysis, this may be less beneficial to overall biodiversity than tackling key metal contaminants.”

    Change in focus

    The review authors, from UKCEH, The James Hutton Institute and AtkinsRéalis, point out that their recommendations would not require any radical change to the current monitoring arrangements. Instead, it would be a change in focus to reporting on biodiversity as the endpoint and the introduction of statistical methods to establish what really holds back further improvements.

    The scientists envisage that, in time, a combination of the proposed surface waterbody biodiversity audit, as well as chemical quality and human health standards could replace the WFD classification. The WFD, which applies to rivers, lakes, canals, estuaries and coastal waters, was introduced by the EU and retained by the UK after Brexit. It requires governments to aim to achieve at least good ecological status for all surface water bodies by 2027, but it is highly likely that this target will be missed.

    In the last classifications in 2019, just 16% of all water bodies assessed in England (including 14% of rivers) had good ecological status. In Wales, 40% achieved this standard in interim classifications in 2024.

    Healthy improvement

    While there is widespread concern about the state of our rivers, Professor Johnson says their ecological health is generally much better than it was in the 1980s. While it is difficult to make like-for-like comparisons, he estimates that if the proposed biodiversity audit were introduced, over 54% of rivers in England would achieve at least good ecological status, as opposed to 14% currently.

    The Independent Water Commission, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, has recommended reforms to the regulations and scope of the WFD in the UK, and says the Government should consider the UKCEH-led review on how to reform the good ecological status metric.

    The UKCEH-led review of the WFD is likely to form part of the evidence base for any changes to the methods used to measure and report on the water environment. It is available on the Defra website.

    -Ends -

    Media enquiries

    For an interview with a review author or further information, please contact Simon Williams, Media Relations Officer at UKCEH, via simwil@ceh.ac.uk or +44 (0)7920 295384.

    Notes to Editors

    Report information

    The review is entitled: Review of the Classification Framework for Ecological Status/Potential under the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) England and Wales Regulations – WT15168. It was funded by Defra.

    About the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH)

    The UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) is a leading independent research institute dedicated to understanding and transforming how we interact with the natural world. 

    With over 600 researchers, we tackle the urgent environmental challenges of our time, such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Our evidence-based insights empower governments, businesses and communities to make informed decisions, shaping a future where both nature and people thrive.

    ceh.ac.uk / BlueSky: @ukceh.bsky.social / LinkedIn: UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

     

    Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news relea