Tuesday, May 19, 2026

  

Loneliness increased over 40 years in Japan



Researchers found a rise in loneliness from 1983 to 2023 using a cross-temporal meta-analysis



Chuo University

Figure 

image: 

Trends in loneliness in Japanese society from 1983 to 2023. The horizontal axis represents the investigation year of study, and the vertical axis represents mean of the UCLA Loneliness Scale scores. Each dot corresponds to an individual data point. As shown by the trend line, loneliness in Japan increased over the 40 years.

view more 

Credit: Momo Homma, Master's Student, Graduate School of Letters, Chuo University Kenkichi Takase, Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Chuo University





Despite widespread claims that social changes have intensified loneliness, no study has yet examined how loneliness has changed over time in Japan. To address this gap, graduate student Momo Homma from the Department of Psychology at Chuo University, Japan and Professor Kenkichi Takase from the same institution conducted a cross-temporal meta-analysis to investigate how loneliness has changed over time in Japan and identify the factors contributing to this change. The results indicated that loneliness increased in Japan from 1983 to 2023. Furthermore, the increase was particularly pronounced among adolescents and women, and social indicators such as marriage rates were found to covary with loneliness. These findings provide a foundation for future research on loneliness and help identify target populations for interventions aimed at reducing loneliness.

Previous research has linked loneliness to mental and physical health, as well as to health-related behaviors, and has also shown that it is associated with increased mortality risk. The World Health Organization has identified loneliness as “a global public health concern” and has positioned it as a public health priority. In Japan, loneliness is also emerging as a social issue. However, its long-term trends have not been systematically examined. Therefore, in this study, we used a cross-temporal meta-analysis to investigate how loneliness has changed over time in Japan.

In this study, we searched four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, J-STAGE, and CiNii) to identify studies conducted in Japan that used the UCLA Loneliness Scale. In the English-language databases, we used the search terms “UCLA Loneliness Scale, Japan” and “UCLA Loneliness Scale, Japanese.” In the Japanese databases, we searched for “UCLA Loneliness Scale (in Japanese).” We also included additional studies identified through the review process. The search yielded 333 records. After removing duplicates and screening abstracts, 251 studies remained. We then applied the exclusion criteria and conducted a full-text review, resulting in a final sample of 81 studies comprising 183 datasets (N = 49,054) included in the meta-analysis. Subsequently, we performed data coding and score adjustments.

The main analysis revealed a significant increase in UCLA Loneliness Scale scores from 1983 to 2023. This finding suggests that loneliness in Japan may have worsened over the past 40 years. Secondary analyses also revealed effects of developmental stage and gender. Regarding developmental stage, loneliness increased among adolescents. In terms of gender, although men consistently showed higher levels of loneliness, an increasing trend was observed only among women. Further analyses also revealed the influence of social indicators. When loneliness scores were compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, loneliness score was higher during the pandemic. In addition, the increase in loneliness covaried with social indicators such as the number of single-person households, marriage rates, GDP, and Internet use.

This study is the first to investigate how loneliness has changed over time in Japan. The results show a substantial increase in loneliness and factors contribute to this trend. The findings highlight loneliness as a pressing social issue and provide key evidence supporting the need for further scientific research and policy interventions.

Increases in loneliness were particularly evident among adolescents and women, highlighting the need for targeted support. To address loneliness in adolescence, future work will explore whether dietary interventions can help reduce loneliness. If effective, we will further examine the underlying biological mechanisms, including the gut–brain axis. To support women, particularly mothers, we are developing a generative AI–based support system (an “AI childcare worker”) designed to alleviate loneliness. We will evaluate its effectiveness and work toward its real-world implementation.

Glossary

1) Loneliness
Loneliness is defined as a subjective negative emotional state resulting from a perceived discrepancy between desired and actual interpersonal relationships. It is distinguished from social isolation, which denotes an objective lack of social connections.

2) Cross-temporal meta-analysis
A method of meta-analysis that uses mean scores of psychological measures to examine changes in those measures over time. Meta-analysis integrates findings from multiple studies to draw overall conclusions and is considered a high level of evidence.

New research finds low-dose buprenorphine may help sustain ketamine’s benefits for suicidal ideation




American Psychiatric Association

 





San Francisco, California, May 18, 2026 — New research published online today in the American Journal of Psychiatry finds that low-dose buprenorphine, given after a single ketamine infusion, significantly sustained reductions in suicidal ideation in adults with major depressive disorder. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is the first to show that a pharmacologic intervention may help maintain and build on ketamine’s anti-suicidal effects in this at-risk population.

Ketamine is known to reduce suicidal thoughts very quickly, often within hours; however, its benefits usually do not last long. In the study, 50 adults with major depression and clinically significant suicidal ideation received a single open-label intravenous infusion of ketamine. Two days later, participants were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose buprenorphine or a placebo for four weeks. Forty-five participants completed at least one week of follow-on treatment and were included in the primary analysis. Both groups improved, but the buprenorphine group showed significantly greater reductions in suicidal ideation over time than the placebo group. At week four, there was a 76% reduction in suicidal ideation in the ketamine and buprenorphine group, compared to a 43% reduction in the ketamine and placebo group.

 

Depression scores improved in both groups during the study, but differences between groups were not statistically significant. No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred.

 

Two of the study’s authors presented their findings at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. The findings are notable because there are currently no FDA-approved medications specifically indicated to reduce suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder. The authors conclude that the ketamine-buprenorphine sequence may represent a potentially scalable and safe therapeutic option for patients at risk of suicide.

 

"This is the second trial to indicate that buprenorphine at low doses reduces suicidal ideation in major depression,” said Allen Schatzberg, M.D., senior author on the study. “However, unlike earlier reports, the degree of reduction was enhanced markedly by pretreating with intravenous ketamine. The similarities of the buprenorphine findings and the availability of both drugs for clinical use could rapidly increase the potential adoption of the sequence as a treatment strategy to reduce suicidality.” 

 

Christine Yu Moutier, M.D., chief medical officer of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), which was one of the study's funders, was also at the presentation to underscore the study’s importance.   

 

“The Research Grants program at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention began in the late 1980s at a time when there had been very little investment in research on suicide risk and prevention,” said Moutier. “Over the years, as AFSP has grown, our priority on funding research has helped to grow a mature field of suicide researchers, like Dr. Alan Schatzberg, who is a leader in the field and who mentors others. We are pleased with the results of his important study, one of the first to show the effectiveness of a pharmacologic intervention in helping maintain and build on ketamine’s anti-suicidal effects in an at-risk population."

The authors noted that the study was relatively small and excluded individuals with substance use disorders, meaning additional research is needed to confirm the findings, determine optimal treatment duration, and better understand longer-term safety and effectiveness. They also note that further study is needed on tapering and follow-up strategies.

The article, “Low-Dose Buprenorphine Following Ketamine Treatment for Suicidal Ideation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial,” can be found at the American Journal of Psychiatry.

In addition to a Focus Grant from the AFSP, the study was supported by funding from the Pritzker Foundation, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and Stanford’s Clinical and Translational Science Award Program.

American Psychiatric Association
The American Psychiatric Association, founded in 1844, is the oldest medical association in the country. The APA is also the largest psychiatric association in the world with more than 40,400 physician members specializing in the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and research of mental illnesses. APA’s vision is to ensure access to quality psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. For more information, please visit www.psychiatry.org.

 

Fear silences women politicians in public debate




Uppsala University

Sandra HÃ¥kansson and Cecilia Josefsson 

image: 

The two authors of the study, Sandra HÃ¥kansson, Doctor of Political Science at Uppsala University and Cecilia Johansson, Docent in Political Science at Uppsala University.

view more 

Credit: Mikael Wallerstedt





Women politicians are significantly more likely than their male colleagues to refrain from speaking out in public for fear of threats or harassment – particularly on issues relating to migration and gender equality. Politicians with an immigrant background are also more likely to avoid making public statements. This is shown by a study based on 43,000 responses from Swedish politicians in both the Riksdag (the national parliament) and municipalities over a ten-year period.

The new study, carried out by two political science researchers at Uppsala University, is based on analyses of data from the Politicians’ Safety Survey (Politikernas trygghetsundersökning) conducted by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. This is a recurring survey sent out to politicians at both national and local level. In the surveys, politicians were asked whether they had ever refrained from making a public statement on a particular issue because they were worried about threats or harassment. Those who answered ‘yes’ were also asked to specify the type of questions they had chosen not to comment on.

“We can see that women are significantly more likely than men to avoid making public statements because of concerns about hate or threats,” says Sandra HÃ¥kansson, a doctor of political science and one of the study’s authors. “This is particularly true of members of parliament (MPs). We can also observe the same problem among MPs with an immigrant background, though the difference there is slightly smaller.”

Based on 43,000 responses

In the study, the researchers drew on six surveys sent out between 2012 and 2022. They analysed a total of 43,000 responses from Swedish politicians at both national and local level. The researchers were then able to see that:

  • Among MPs, 36 per cent of the women avoided making public statements, compared with 20 per cent of the men.
  • 36 per cent of MPs with immigrant backgrounds stated that they avoided speaking out in public, as against 26 per cent of those without immigrant backgrounds.
  • Among local politicians, 18 per cent of the women stated that they avoided speaking out in public, compared with 13 per cent of the men.
  • 18 per cent of the local politicians from immigrant backgrounds stated that they avoided speaking out in public, as against 14 per cent of those without immigrant backgrounds.

Avoid questions about migration and gender equality

In the free-text responses, the politicians could indicate which issues they had chosen not to debate in public. These ranged from local issues, such as the closure of a school or a health centre, to more general responses such as ‘migration’.

“The free-text responses show that women politicians and immigrant-background politicians avoid speaking out publicly on a wider range of issues than other politicians,” says Cecilia Josefsson, a docent in political science and one of the study’s authors. “Women are also disproportionately silenced in debates that challenge traditional male dominance – particularly on issues of gender equality and migration.”

In cases where a free-text response came up more than ten times, the researchers coded it as a separate category. By far the largest number of respondents said they had refrained from commenting publicly on an issue relating to migration.

“It is often claimed that there has been no serious debate on migration, or that discussion of the issue has been too one-sided. Our findings show that there are certain perspectives that may not come out in the debate because politicians want to avoid harassment and threats,” says Josefsson.

Although the issue of migration was a recurring theme among many who avoided making public statements, politicians with an immigrant background were no more likely than others to refrain from commenting on these particular issues.

One in three MPs refrained from debate during latest election year

When the researchers analysed the survey responses from the latest election campaign in 2022, they found that 38 per cent of all MPs had chosen to refrain from making public statements.

“It goes without saying that taking part in public debate and shaping public opinion is an integral part of being a member of parliament. It is therefore alarming that as many as 38 per cent choose not to speak out publicly on some issue for undemocratic reasons,” says HÃ¥kansson.

The fact that certain topics are not raised in the debate even though they concern matters that many voters consider important risks leading to distorted political decisions.

“The fact that so many people choose not to speak out leads to a narrower debate in which we do not get to hear all perspectives,” Josefsson comments. “Just thinking about the gender equality aspect, historically Sweden has of course had numerically equal representation in politics, particularly when compared with many other countries. However, it is not enough simply for women to be involved in politics; they must have the same opportunity as their male colleagues to shape the debate and put issues on the agenda. Our study raises questions about whose voices are actually being heard, which is particularly important now we are getting into a new election campaign.”

 

One-fifth of pregnant people aren’t properly screened for syphilis



Canadian Medical Association Journal






According to new research in CMAJ, 1 in 5 pregnant people in Ontario did not receive timely syphilis screening, which is critical for preventing syphilis infection in newborns (Canadian Medical Association Journal) https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.251757.

“In a publicly funded health care system, 1 in 5 pregnancies did not receive timely syphilis screening, indicating persistent gaps in coverage,” writes Dr. Sahar Saeed, assistant professor, Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, with coauthors. “Sociodemographic and behavioural risk factors associated with being screened late may be related to an increased likelihood of inadequate prenatal care access.”

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that can be passed from mother to baby during pregnancy or delivery and can result in severe outcomes, including infant death, if untreated with antibiotics. Over the last 10 years, rates of infectious syphilis in females of reproductive age (15 to 39 years) have increased from 2.3 to 53.8 cases per 100 000 and, in parallel, rates of congenital syphilis have increased from 0.3 to 14.5 cases per 100 000 live births.

Global pregnancy care guidelines recommend universal screening for syphilis in the first trimester or at the initial prenatal care visit.

In this study of 551 706 pregnancies in 446 660 people in Ontario, Canada’s largest province, between 2018 and 2023, researchers found that 8% of pregnant people were not screened at all and 79% were screened in the first trimester. Among pregnancies screened for syphilis, approximately 3% were screened in the third trimester or at delivery. The authors’ findings suggest that late screening may occur in people with the most barriers to accessing prenatal care.

“Relying solely on traditional prenatal care models may not be sufficient to reach populations who face barriers to accessing care. Providing nonjudgmental, comprehensive care in tandem with complementary strategies, such as opportunistic screening and community-based outreach programs using point-of-care testing, is a critical next step,” the authors say. These approaches have shown promise in reaching underserved populations and closing access gaps.

This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Catalyst Grant (STBBI Research in Canada: Beyond HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C) (no. SR7-196517).

 

Climate change and emerging diseases pose challenges for physicians




Canadian Medical Association Journal






Climate change is affecting the local ecology in Canada, contributing to emerging tick- and mosquito-borne diseases and infections in humans, argue authors of a commentary published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.260668.

“Climate change can drive disease emergence by increasing survival and geographic distributions of pathogens, vectors, and animal reservoir hosts, as well as by affecting human behaviour,” writes Dr. Eleni Galanis, Infectious Diseases and Vaccine Programs Branch at the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), with a coauthor. “The risk from climate-sensitive diseases already common in Canada is increasing.”

Tropical diseases, such as dengue, chikungunya, or other mosquito-borne infections, could be transmitted locally as the Asian tiger mosquito, a host for these diseases, has been detected in the southernmost part of Ontario.

Clinicians should be aware of these disease threats and advise patients to take precautions when travelling and during summer months at home.

Two related articles in this issue of CMAJ provide clinical examples of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, a newer disease, and tick-borne spirochetosis, a rare and difficult-to-diagnose disease.

https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.251935
https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.252050

“People in Canada are observing the substantial effects of climate change on human health. Physicians can prepare by familiarizing themselves with potential climate-sensitive diseases in their regions and maintaining a high index of suspicion in the appropriate clinical context,” the authors conclude.

 

The city mouse really is bolder than the country mouse, and so are most animals, according to global study



Urban animals are bolder than their rural counterparts, finds new study




British Ecological Society





A global analysis has found that urban animals are bolder and more aggressive, exploratory and active than their rural counterparts. The findings are published in the British Ecological Society’s Journal of Animal Ecology.

Researchers at Lewis & Clark College (Portland), CEFE-CNRS in Montpellier, and North Dakota State University have conducted a first of its kind, global meta-analysis of how animal behaviour varies between urban and non-urban populations of birds, mammals, amphibians, reptiles and insects.

They found that urban populations exhibited heightened boldness, aggression, exploration, and activity compared to rural counterparts. These findings were most pronounced in birds, but the researchers caution that there was much more limited data on the other animal groups.

Dr Tracy Burkhard, Assistant professor of biology at Lewis & Clark College, and first-author of the study, said: “We found that no matter where you are in the world, urbanisation is changing behaviour in consistent predictable ways. The strongest result was that animals seem to be more risk positive. They're more bold.”

The researchers warn that a shift towards these traits could increase the risk of human-wildlife conflict and zoonotic disease transmission.

“If animals are more risk-taking and they're less averse to human presence, we're going to be coming into contact with wildlife a lot more in certain areas, and that is potentially bad for both us and wildlife.” said Dr Burkhard.

The researchers also warn that it’s not just species that we’re used to seeing in cities - like rats, gulls and pigeons - that are becoming bolder. The same behavioural shifts are being seen in species that are more commonly associated with rural habitats, but which are now adapting to urban life, such as whitethroat, yellow hammer and redpoll.

The results highlight the need for urban planners to consider animal behaviour, especially as urbanisation increases. This could include creating connected greenspaces to maintain connectivity and gene flow among urban animal subpopulations.

In the analyses, the researchers combined data from 80 existing studies that looked at animal behavioural traits. These studies spanned 28 countries and 133 distinct species. Over 70% of the research was on birds, with insects, amphibians and reptiles making up just 10% of the data, indicating that most species remain understudied in terms of the effect of urbanisation on behaviour.

Dr Anne Charmantier, Research Director (DRCE) at CNRS, University of Montpellier, and a co-author of the research said: “Our study shows that the research effort is very imbalanced across taxa; in particular birds are much more commonly studied than amphibians, reptiles or insects. The lack of data in some animal classes limits some of our conclusion and should be seen as an encouragement to study all organisms living in cities.”

-ENDS-