Showing posts sorted by date for query PSYCHEDELICS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query PSYCHEDELICS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

 

Study: Obscure 1967 guide for LSD use still relevant as psychedelics gain in popularity


Survey participants agree with 18 of 19 tips from Lisa Bieberman, largely unknown acolyte of acid guru Timothy Leary



University at Buffalo



BUFFALO, N.Y. ­—  As psychedelic drugs such as LSD gain new momentum as a therapeutic treatment for severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and even headaches, a University at Buffalo researcher is exploring safety education for recreational users.

Daniel Kruger, PhD, research associate professor in the School of Public Health and Health Professions, looked back more than half a century for best practices on harm reduction.

In the 1960s, when Harvard psychology lecturer and psychedelics proponent Timothy Leary was advising people to “turn on, tune in, and drop out,” a young Radcliffe College graduate was quietly focused on another aspect of hallucinogens — safety.

Lisa Bieberman, who had been a Leary follower, established the Psychedelic Information Center in Cambridge, Mass. In February 1967, she published the $1 pamphlet, “Session Games People Play: A Manual for the Use of LSD,” which recommended best practices for the use of all types of psychedelics, especially for first-timers. She also addressed what might go wrong during an LSD or psilocybin ("magic”) mushroom trip.

“Bieberman highlights a number of games that may be better avoided during a LSD session, such as running away from your companions and believing that you have unlocked the deepest truths of the universe and need to tell the world about them,” Kruger says. “She also recommended that users stay with people they like and trust, avoid going out in public, and clear their minds of negative emotions.”

He launched a study with Paul Gillis-Smith, program lead at the Center for the Study of World Religious Studies at Harvard Divinity School, in which they surveyed almost 600 self-identified psychedelic users. Their findings, which showed that participants agreed with 18 of 19 pieces of Bieberman’s advice, were published in the Aug. 12 edition of the journal Psychedelics.

Other authors on the study are affiliated with the Michigan Psychedelic Center at the University of Michigan; Blue Sage Health Consulting in Ann Arbor, Mich., the Michigan Psychedelic Society; and the Radical Well-Being Center in Southfield, Mich.

When Kruger discovered Bieberman’s pragmatic teachings, which differed from Leary’s esoteric rhetoric, such as “surrender to the void,” he wanted to see if they would hold up today. It’s a timely inquiry, considering that psychedelic use now exceeds that of the counterculture ‘60s, according to Kruger.

Today, these drugs are gaining new momentum through hundreds of clinical trials and legal pathways in states like Oregon and Colorado, Kruger says.

“The idea is to medicalize these psychedelics for psychiatric conditions such as severe PTSD and depression,” he adds. “There really hasn’t been any big innovations in mental health medications since the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were introduced in the 1980s, and they don’t work as well as we originally thought.”

Psychedelics have even been used to treat physical conditions such as cluster headaches, which are so painful that some sufferers have reported suicidal ideation.

“The clinical trials show people are getting better for a range of conditions,” he says. “Some report finding more meaning in life, having greater spiritual connections, and improving their relationships.”

While these trials may offer promise to millions of  people, Kruger notes that the majority of those experimenting with psychedelics are doing so outside of a regulated context and with little prevention education.

 “As a public health professional, I believe we need to protect these users,” he says. “When Lisa’s pamphlet was published, there were few resources for novice users. Although the term ‘harm reduction’ was decades from entering the vernacular of drug use education and safety, we propose that ‘Session Games’ and Bieberman’s larger collection of work are precursors to this approach.”

The anonymous survey participants, who were recruited via online advertisements and in-person outreach at a psychedelic advocacy event in Ann Arbor, Mich., reported using LSD and psilocybin mushrooms, mescaline, ayahuasca, ketamine, and MDMA (ecstasy/molly), primarily within the last year. They ranged in age from 18 to 85, with an average age of 43. Some identified as psychedelic guides or educators.

In regard to how to best prepare for a psychedelic experience, the majority of respondents agreed with the statements: “Be with people who know, like, and trust each other,” and “Be aware that, even with a guide, you have to do most of the work yourself.”

For overall advice, the strongest agreement was with the statements, “Recognize that the experience will eventually end,” and “Recognize that you may experience anxiety, which does not mean that something is wrong.”

Participants neither uniformly agreed nor disagreed with the advice to avoid looking in the mirror during a psychedelic trip, which over the decades has proven to be a scary experience for some users.

“Participants strongly endorsed advice emphasizing interpersonal trust, personal responsibility and psychological preparation – principles thought to be foundations to safe and meaningful psychedelic experiences in clinical research,” Kruger says.

Indeed psychedelics were considered a promising therapeutic tool in the mid-20th century when they used to treat such conditions as neurosis and schizophrenia, along with general psychotherapy. However, by the late 1960s, drugs became criminalized and psychedelic therapy waned.

While classic psychedelic drugs are still illegal in the United States, Colorado and Oregon have established state-regulated frameworks for supervised therapeutic use. New Mexico is not far behind, says Kruger, who predicts that more psychedelics-based medications will enter the marketplace in the not-too-distant future.

“It’s a freight train coming down the tracks,” he says. “So, we better have a train station to safely load passengers into this train or else they’re just going to try to jump on board while this train is moving.”

Kruger notes that the 2026 Psychedelic Community Survey is now available for anyone to take, regardless if they have experienced psychedelics. While all answers are anonymous, he recommends that participants take the survey on a private computer or device in a private location.

 

Clinical trial tests psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression in advanced lung cancer patients



It’s the first trial specific to lung cancer using hallucinogenic mushroom-assisted therapy




Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Davis and Wagener

image: 

At The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, Alan Davis, PhD (left) and Theodore Wagener, PhD (right) developed the first-ever clinical trial treating lung cancer patients with psilocybin-based therapy.

view more 

Credit: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center






Nearly 40% of people with lung cancer experience depression, and many also face anxiety, hopelessness and questions about mortality after diagnosis. Researchers at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC – James) and the Center for Psychedelic Drug Research and Education (CPDRE) in the College of Social Work (CSW) are leading a clinical trial to test whether psilocybin-assisted therapy can help reduce depression and emotional distress among patients with lung cancer.

An unmet mental health need

This new research addresses a pressing gap in cancer care: Many people with advanced lung cancer are living longer because of treatment advances, but depression, anxiety and distress can still affect daily life, relationships and the ability to cope with treatment.

This is the first study to test psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression specifically in people with lung cancer. The emotional strain can be especially intense for people with lung cancer, yet treatment options for cancer-related depression have changed little as cancer care has improved.

Psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychedelic compound found in certain mushrooms. In this study, it is given in a carefully controlled medical setting with counseling and support from trained therapists.

"There is growing evidence that psilocybin-assisted therapy may help relieve depression in people with cancer, but no study has focused specifically on patients with lung cancer," said Alan Davis, PhD, co-principal investigator of the study and directs Ohio State's Center for Psychedelic Drug Research and Education. "This is the first clinical trial designed to determine whether this approach can address the unique psychological challenges faced by this patient population."

"Many patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and are forced to confront questions about their future very quickly," said Theodore Wagener, PhD, co-principal investigator of the study and director of Ohio State's Center for Tobacco Research. Both Wagener and Davis are scientists with the OSUCCC – James Cancer Control Research Program. "Patients may experience anxiety, existential distress, loss of meaning and concerns about their families. Some also carry guilt tied to the stigma that can be associated with lung cancer."

Researchers say these emotional burdens can affect quality of life, daily routines, relationships and how patients experience cancer treatment.

Testing a guided treatment model

During this clinical trial, researchers will measure changes in depression and emotional well-being to learn whether the approach could offer another option for patients facing advanced cancer.

The trial combines psychotherapy with one supervised dose of psilocybin. Participants first complete about eight hours of preparation with two trained therapists. They then receive psilocybin during a daylong treatment session in a comfortable clinical setting, followed by counseling to help them process the experience.

"From the moment patients enter the study, they are paired with two therapists who support them throughout the entire process," Davis said. "The goal is to help participants feel safe, build trust and make sense of their experiences in ways that may improve their well-being."

Researchers also are studying whether psilocybin may affect inflammation, though more research is needed.

Looking beyond the cancer

For study participant Betty Paschall, the therapy was part of a turning point after a devastating diagnosis. Paschall was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer and initially felt overwhelmed by depression despite receiving treatment for her cancer.

"I didn't want to live," she said. "It was like I was the walking dead."

After participating in the study, Paschall said she noticed meaningful changes in her outlook and daily life. She began engaging in activities she had stopped doing and found herself reconnecting with the people and experiences that brought her joy.

"My sister and daughter both saw a difference in me," Paschall said. "I started to get back to myself a little more."

Researchers caution that psilocybin-assisted therapy remains experimental and is not appropriate for every patient. Participants undergo careful screening, and treatment is provided only under close medical supervision.

A successful study, investigators say, could help identify which patients are most likely to benefit and lay the groundwork for larger studies aimed at expanding treatment options for cancer-related depression.

"Cancer care has made major advances, but treatment for the depression, anxiety and distress that can come with advanced cancer has not moved as quickly," Wagener said. "We hope this research helps us better support the whole person, not just the cancer."

More Information 

Patients interested in being screened to participate in the study should contact Angela Douglas at douglas.496@osu.edu. To learn more about lung cancer treatment at the OSUCCC - James, visit cancer.osu.edu or call 1-800-293-5066.

Thursday, September 17, 2026

 

Can psychedelic clinical trials be better? Researchers say yes





University of California - San Francisco






UC San Francisco researchers are weighing in on one of the biggest challenges in psychedelic science, arguing that clinical trials need more convincing placebo treatments to better measure the drugs' true effects.

The debate hinges on "masking," the clinical trial gold standard that keeps patients and researchers from knowing who receives the active drug or a placebo. Because psychedelics produce such distinctive effects, participants can almost always tell whether they got the real thing. That makes it hard to separate a drug's effects from the power of expectation, including the disappointment patients feel when they realize they did not receive the psychedelic.

In a perspective published Sept. 16 in JAMA Psychiatry, researchers from UCSF, UC San Diego, and Stanford University call for a more aggressive approach to preserving masking in psychedelic clinical trials. The paper arrives as psychedelic research gains momentum and regulators face growing pressure to decide how these treatments should be evaluated and approved.

Instead of relying on active placebos such as niacin, which can cause flushing but little else resembling a psychedelic experience, the researchers propose carefully designed combinations of approved drugs to create a more convincing placebo. They also recommend limiting what participants are told about the study, making it harder to guess which treatment they received.

Psychedelics for serious mental illness have drawn growing interest because many patients do not respond to existing treatments. The authors argue that if researchers too readily accept failed masking as unavoidable, these compounds will never be rigorously tested.

"People say psychedelics can't be masked, so we should stop trying and just move on, because the effects are so obvious," said Josh D. Woolley, MD, PhD, associate professor in residence of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at UCSF and the paper's senior author. "But medicine has been fooled by obvious effects before. Heart stents for stable chest pain and knee arthroscopy for arthritis both looked effective until sham-controlled trials showed they weren't. We're excited about this paper because it outlines a novel approach that might finally make effective masking possible for psychedelics."

The proposed strategy, called UMBRAA, short for Unidentifiable Multidrug Blinding with Reduced, Authorized Awareness, combines giving carefully selected FDA-approved drugs with limited disclosure to study participants about what drugs they are receiving to make it harder for them to guess whether they are in the active treatment or the placebo-controlled arm of the study.

For example, a placebo might combine drugs from different classes, such as a sedative, a stimulant, and a cannabinoid. The researchers hypothesize that pairing drugs with different effects could create an intense, unfamiliar altered state that is harder to distinguish from psilocybin than current controls.

The researchers acknowledge that UMBRAA raises safety and ethical concerns and would require careful screening, close medical monitoring, and regulatory oversight.

They stress that the framework is a proposal, not a proven method. Future research will need to identify safe drug combinations, test whether they improve masking, and establish appropriate safeguards.

Authors: Other authors include Andrew Krystal, MD, PhD, of UCSF; Kevin H. Yang, MD, of UC San Diego; and Boris D. Heifets, MD, PhD, of Stanford University.

About UCSF: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is exclusively focused on the health sciences and is dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. UCSF Health, which serves as UCSF’s primary academic medical system, includes top-ranked specialty hospitals  and other clinical programs, and has affiliations throughout the Bay Area. UCSF School of Medicine also has a regional campus in Fresno. Learn more at ucsf.edu. 

Wednesday, September 09, 2026

 

Psychedelics and anesthetics create mirror image patterns in the brain



A new study offers a data-driven approach to differentiating conscious state



Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan





For something so familiar to human experience, consciousness is still a mystery.

Each day, people cycle through wakefulness and sleep, from a higher level of consciousness to a lower one.

What’s more, some people alter their conscious experience with drugs such as psychedelics, or have unconsciousness induced by anesthesia.

Researchers have investigated these altered states of awareness in an attempt to understand how consciousness is organized within the brain.

A new Michigan Medicine led study takes a data driven approach and for the first time reveals that psychedelics and anesthetics create “mirror image” patterns of large-scale brain organization, with opposite network features.

The team, led by Rui Dai, Ph.D., and Zirui Huang, Ph.D., of the Department of Anesthesiology and Center for Consciousness Science at Michigan Medicine, analyzed functional MRI data from study participants who were administered psychedelic compounds—LSD, psilocybin and nitrous oxide—and compared them to readouts of MRIs of the brain in a sleeping state or under sedation with propofol.

“In previous literature, each individual drug’s influence on brain connectivity was analyzed separately,” said Dai.

“To our knowledge, no one has systematically assessed these two drug classes to compare network organization compared to waking consciousness.”

Specifically, the team observed that psychedelics increased functional connectivity (how closely two brain regions work together), while sleep and anesthesia reduced it.

The same pattern held for topological integration, meaning how easily information travels across the brain, and for interaction complexity, or the number of different patterns of brain interaction that can be observed.

“Overall, these results mean that during psychedelic states, the brain becomes more globally connected, more efficient in communication and more dynamic, while anesthetic states are the opposite,” said Dai.

Furthermore, their results offer a reliable way to differentiate conscious states using data.

The neural mechanism of consciousness is a longstanding scientific question, adds Huang, who is Director of the Center for Consciousness Science at University of Michigan Medical School.

“We analyze it using drugs because we know they will affect consciousness in some way, but we don’t know how. The mirror-image effect discovered by this study suggests that the integration, efficiency, and complexity of brain activity may be fundamental to consciousness.”

Additional authors: Hyunwoo Jang, Anthony G. Hudetz and George Mashour

Paper cited: “Opposite network patterns of integration-segregation in psychedelic and sedated states of consciousness,” Cell Reports. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117830

Sunday, September 06, 2026

 

New study shows that psychedelic drugs affect the brain differently


LSD, psilocybin and other psychedelic drugs are often considered as one group. But a new study shows that each drug affects the brain differently. The findings could have implications for the development of future treatments for mental health disorders



University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences

Long term effects 

image: 

Long term effects as seen in brain scans on rats

view more 

Credit: Mikael Palner, University of Southern Denmark





In recent years, psychedelic drugs have attracted growing interest as potential treatments for conditions including depression, anxiety and addiction. Although these drugs are often considered as one group, researchers from the University of Southern Denmark have now shown that they affect the brain in markedly different ways. The findings are based on brain scans in rats and suggest that the differences between psychedelic drugs may be greater than previously assumed.

The differences can be seen directly in the brain

Previous studies have mainly investigated one psychedelic drug at a time. In the new study, the researchers directly compared three drugs: LSD, psilocybin and 2C-B, a synthetic drug with psychedelic properties.

The researchers examined how the drugs changed brain activity, both while the drugs were active and one week later.

The results showed that each drug produced its own distinct pattern. Only a few changes were shared across all three drugs.

-Psychedelic drugs are often discussed as if they work in the same way. But when we look at the brain, the differences are clear. Each drug appears to affect its own networks, and that is new knowledge, says Mikael Palner, Associate Professor at the Department of Clinical Research at the University of Southern Denmark and senior author of the study.

More than one type of psychedelic drug

The researchers found that the three psychedelic drugs changed brain activity in different ways. 2C-B and LSD produced the most changes while the drugs were active, but the researchers also found different effects after the acute effects of the drugs had worn off.

-What is interesting is that the differences do not only appear while the drugs are active. We can also see different traces in the brain afterwards. 2C-B mainly affected areas linked to reward, LSD affected areas linked to habits and motivation, while psilocybin stood out by primarily affecting areas involved in emotions, says Frederik Gudmundsen, first author of the study. Gudmundsen completed his PhD at the University of Southern Denmark and is now a postdoc at the Department of Clinical Medicine, Translational Neuropsychiatry Unit, Aarhus University.

This does not necessarily mean that one drug is better than another. But the findings suggest that psychedelic drugs may not be best understood as a single group when they are being investigated as medicines.

-If the drugs affect the brain differently, it is also possible that they may eventually prove better suited to different disorders. We do not know that yet, but our study provides a biological starting point for investigating it, explains Mikael Palner.

A step towards more targeted treatments

Interest in psychedelic medicines has grown considerably in recent years. Several drugs are currently being investigated in clinical trials for conditions including depression, PTSD and addiction.

The new study does not tell us whether the drugs work in patients. But it gives researchers a better understanding of what happens in the brain when different psychedelic drugs are active. This knowledge could become important if future treatments are to be more closely tailored to individual disorders.

The researchers also emphasise that the findings come from experiments in rats. Studies in humans are therefore needed before it is possible to say whether the same differences are also relevant to the treatment of patients.

Three questions for the researcher about the study

What did you investigate in the study?

We investigated whether three psychedelic drugs affect the brain in the same way or whether each drug has its own distinct effects.

What is the most important finding?

That LSD, psilocybin and 2C-B affect the brain differently, even though they all produce psychedelic effects.

What could the findings be used for?

The findings could contribute to the more targeted development of psychedelic medicines and help researchers investigate whether different drugs may be better suited to different mental health disorders.

About the study

Method

The researchers compared LSD, psilocybin and 2C-B in rats using PET scans and measurements of brain activity and connections between different brain regions. Brain activity was studied both during the acute effects of the drugs and one week later.

Funding

The study was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, Neuroscience Academy Denmark and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The authors have also disclosed relevant potential conflicts of interest. Mikael Palner holds shares in Compass Pathways and AtaiBeckley. He has previously been involved in research collaborations with Compass Pathways, A7imuth, TetraKit, Arla, Cymap and Bright Minds Bio and is an adviser to BrandarisTx. None of these companies or relationships had any influence on the study.