Friday, October 10, 2025

  Nuclear News

Nuclear startup Hadron Energy to go public in $1.2B deal 

Image: Hadron Energy.

Nuclear startup Hadron Energy has announced it will go public on the Nasdaq via a $1.2 billion business combination with GigCapital7 Corp, a Private-to-Public Equity firm. 

The deal will provide approximately $200 million in net proceeds, which will be used to accelerate product development and commercial deployment of Hadron’s technology, it said. The deal is expected to close in Q1 2026. 

The Redwood City, California-based company said it has designed a micro modular reactor (MMR) built on light water reactor technology with an operationally efficient 10-year fueling cycle.

MMRs are miniaturized nuclear power plants being increasingly used in AI data center infrastructure, and can power mining operations by providing a low-carbon source of electricity and heat, replacing diesel generators and reducing emissions. MMRs produce between 1 and 20 megawatts of electric power per 1 module. 

“We’re at a $1.2 billion dollar valuation. We’re excited about the opportunity to service not only data center customers, but also more remote  industrial applications,” Sam Gibson, founder and CEO of Hadron Energy, told MINING.com in an interview. “In the mining industry, there is a lot of interest and very high demand for our product.”

There are currently 94 nuclear reactors operating in the United States across 54 power plants at full scale, variations of light water designs. 

Gibson said the company’s focus is miniaturizing reactors in a mass manufacturable package that can then be distributed to remote applications or data centers.

“We don’t have to have an external water supply,” Gibson said. “And ultimately, we have demand ranging anywhere from 10 megawatts, which is one unit, all the way up to even gigawatt scale deployments, which is 1,000 megawatts plus.”

Hadron’s MMR design. Image supplied.

“Plenty of uranium supply”

Uranium is a crucial source of reliable baseload power as nuclear energy, and the US requires an estimated 32 million pounds of uranium annually for its current nuclear reactors. Energy Fuels’ White Mesa Mill in Utah is the only producing mill in the US.

In 2024, the US purchased 50 million pounds of uranium, but only produced 677,000 pounds, according to the Energy Information Administration.

But Gibson said uranium supply is not currently an issue for the company.

“One of our uranium suppliers has about 1.7 million pounds of uranium ore right now. So the supply is there.” 

Gibson said it comes down to the energy density of uranium and the enrichment, pointing out that typically 5% enriched and below is what’s used in the commercial industry today.

“Our reactor is using slightly higher enrichment, which enables us to have a smaller core. We are primarily focused on reactor development.” 

Hadron is working on the engineering and licensing side to begin producing the reactors at scale, and Gibson said what puts Hadron at the forefront is that there’s still not a licensed microreactor on the market today.

“When it came to incorporating, we had a lot of the groundwork already worked out. So that’s why we’ve been able to make such rapid progress on the regulatory side, on the engineering design side,” he said. 

“Historically, you’ll have reactors that have fueling cycles of about two years, but since we’re using a higher enrichment, that gives our core life a longer life and it enables us to have even a more compact design. Those are really the key innovations we’re working on here. That’s the entire goal – a 24-7 energy producing source.”


Holtec cancels plans for New Mexico interim storage facility



Holtec International has announced that plans to build a consolidated interim storage facility for used nuclear fuel in New Mexico have been cancelled.
 

How the CSIF might have looked (Image: Holtec)

"After discussions with our longtime partner in the HI-STORE project, the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance, and due to the untenable path forward for used fuel storage in New Mexico, we mutually agreed upon cancelling the agreement. This allows for ELEA to work to redevelop the property in a manner that fits their needs and allows Holtec to work with other states who are amenable to used fuel storage based on the recent DOE work on public education and outreach," Holtec said in a statement.

Holtec and the Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance (ELEA) - which includes the cities of Hobbs and Carlsbad as well as Eddy County and Lea County - signed a memorandum of agreement in 2015 covering the design, licensing, construction and operation of a facility modelled on Holtec's HI-STORM UMAX dry storage system. Known as the HI-STORE CISF (for Consolidated Interim Storage Facility), the proposed facility was to have been built at a site located between Carlsbad and Hobbs in Lea County on land owned by ELEA and would provide an option for storing used nuclear fuel from US power reactors until a permanent repository should become available. Used fuel was to be transported by rail to the CSIF.

The initial application for the HI-STORE facility included storage of up to 8,680 tonnes tons of uranium in commercial used fuel with future amendments for up to 10,000 storage canisters, according to Holtec information.

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a final licence to Holtec to build and operate HI-STORE in 2023. But in March 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals published a decision to "vacate" the licence following a similar ruling against another Interim Storage Partners' licence to provide interim storage in Texas. In June this year, the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiffs in the Texas case did not have standing to challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s decision to provide a permit to Interim Storage Partners.

Holtec, together with the NRC and the federal government, had filed Supreme Court petitions asking for the licence to be reinstated.

Technology licensing is landmark for US uranium remediation


Regulatory approval means Disa Technologies Inc's High-Pressure Slurry Ablation technology can be used to remediate abandoned uranium mine waste at inactive mine sites while opening the possibility of recycling uranium recovered from the waste.

Disa Chief Regulatory Affairs Officer Stephen Cohen, NRC Commissioner Bradley Crowell, NRC Chairman David Wright, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, Greyson Buckingham, NRC Commissioner Matthew Marzano, Disa Board Member Jeff Merrifield and Navajo Nation Washington Office Deputy Executive Director DeWayne Crank mark the approval of the licence (Image: Disa Technologies)

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) accepted Disa's application for a licence to use its technology to remediate abandoned mine waste at inactive mine sites in April, when the regulator set a schedule for a detailed technical review and developed and deployed a clear, first-of-its-kind regulatory framework which saw the licensing approval process completed in six months - much quicker than the 18-24 months it might have taken previously.

Disa's patented High-Pressure Slurry Ablation (HPSA) technology is a mechanical process leveraging collisions between particles. It exploits the difference in Mohs hardness - a scale for measuring the relative hardness of minerals - between a base mineral and target mineral to selectively liberate the target mineral. The process can be used to upgrade critical minerals from both mined ore and legacy waste.

There are more than 15,000 sites associated with abandoned uranium mine waste - or AUM waste - waste across the western USA, largely from Cold War-era mining activities. Many of these sites are located on or near tribal lands. But options to safely treat or contain the contaminated material have up to now been limited and costly, according to Disa.

High-Pressure Slurry Ablation technology offers the first scalable method to remediate this waste safely and economically, the company said, separating and cleaning the material at the source, and making it possible to recycle uranium while dramatically reducing the volume of material requiring long-term disposal.

The NRC licence allows Disa to deploy its High-Pressure Slurry Ablation systems under federal oversight to treat abandoned uranium mine waste across multiple states. It builds on years of collaboration among federal and tribal partners, including the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA). Disa also said it had received strong support and engagement throughout the licensing process from a diverse coalition of environmental, nuclear energy, and community stakeholders, including the Navajo Nation and other tribal leaders, ClearPath Action, Good Energy Collective, Third Way, Nuclear Innovation Alliance, Breakthrough Institute, Native Nuclear (formerly the Tribal Consent-Based Coalition), Generation Atomic, academic leaders from several US universities, and numerous bipartisan Members of Congress from both chambers.

Disa CEO, president, and co-founder Greyson Buckingham expressed his gratitude to key stakeholders including the NRC's Chairman and Commissioners, the senators of Arizona and Wyoming, and Navajo Nation leadership, for their support, saying the licence is "a turning point" in tackling legacy uranium contamination. "For decades, AUM sites have been viewed as a burden too complex and costly to clean up. Today, we have a clear, regulated pathway to do it faster, safer, and at lower cost - while recycling valuable resources that support our nation's energy future," he said.

"The Navajo Nation is proud to help with this critical breakthrough," said Buu Nygren, President of the Navajo Nation. "By combining innovative technology with regulatory leadership, we have a new path to remediate legacy uranium sites to restore our lands to safe, productive use and to protect our precious groundwater resources … I encourage continued discussions at the federal level to ensure a safe legacy cleanup is performed in a timely manner."

Uranium has momentum amid policy tailwinds, fundamentals: Sprott

Stock image.

The uranium market has momentum on its side as it looks to end 2025 on a strong note, with several catalysts lined up to fuel a sector seen as critical for the future of energy, says Sprott.

In a report released on Thursday, the firm listed three key developments that could lift uranium even further, namely the US government’s critical minerals policy, accelerating demand for the nuclear fuel, and concerns surrounding supply.

In the first case, Sprott analysts led by Jacob White pointed to the Trump administration’s intent to stockpile more uranium to alleviate the persistent supply gap for US utilities and the country’s heavy reliance on foreign supply, in particular that of Russia. The plan, if enacted, could result in billions of dollars in funding towards building a secure uranium supply and the required nuclear technologies, reinforcing a bullish outlook for the sector, Sprott said.

Secondly, Sprott said it is increasingly confident in uranium’s long-term fundamentals, especially after the World Nuclear Association’s (WNA) September symposium. It pointed to a WNA report that outlined lofty demand expectations, from the current 175 million lb. of U3O8 equivalent annually to 391 million lb. by 2040, representing a 124% growth.

Importantly, the WNA forecast was more than double its previous, highlighting a surge in optimism over nuclear fuel use, especially with a “new class” of demand from hyperscalers such as Microsoft.

Lastly, Sprott’s bullish sentiment is reinforced by a structurally tight supply amid expectations of declining output from the world’s top producers such as Kazatomprom and Cameco, as well as execution risks across the development pipeline. Also, it stated that the WNA report had missed some of the key production cuts, meaning the uranium market could be even tighter than headline figures suggest.

Bullish outlook intact

Sprott said these factors will be critical in driving the momentum in uranium as the current cycle progresses. In September, market sentiment turned sharply positive as fresh capital flowed in and supply tightened, leading to an 8% rise in uranium prices during the month and a rebound to $82/lb., it wrote.

The rebound followed months of dislocation, which saw uranium prices reach a maximum spread of $17/lb. This, as Sprott said, was not “sustainable” for a market that is in a structural deficit position.

Doubling down on its bullish outlook, the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (TSX: U.U for USD; U.UN for CAD) has continued to buy up uranium and now holds over 72 million lb. — maintaining its position as the world’s largest physical uranium holder. Year to date, the Trust has gained about 8.7%, with a market capitalization exceeding $6 billion.

Meanwhile, uranium equities have delivered impressive performances, with the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF rising by over 50% this year. Over the past five years, uranium and related equities have significantly outperformed other asset classes, according to Sprott.


World Nuclear News


Advanced fuel material samples ready for irradiation testing

Capsules containing Lightbridge Fuel material samples of enriched uranium‑zirconium alloy have been loaded into an experimental assembly ready for irradiation testing, Lightbridge Corporation has announced.
 
One of the capsules is being handed to the operator for loading into an experimental assembly (Image: Lightbridge)

The material samples, which were manufactured at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), are now ready to be inserted into the lab's Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) for irradiation testing, which is expected to begin later this year.

The enriched uranium-zirconium alloy coupon samples match the composition intended for Lightbridge's future commercial Lightbridge Fuel product, and were manufactured and loaded into capsules under stringent quality control and process validation protocols, the company said. The experiment assembly will be placed in the reactor core for irradiation testing.


Fuel is loaded into rodlet holders (Image: Lightbridge)

The irradiation testing programme and post-irradiation examination activities aim to generate critical irradiation performance data which will support the company's regulatory licensing and commercialisation efforts for deployment of Lightbridge Fuel.

"We are proud to collaborate with Lightbridge on the assembly of this irradiation experiment," said Jess Gehin, Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science & Technology at Idaho National Laboratory. "This is an important step in testing and validating the performance of Lightbridge's advanced fuel in a test reactor environment."

"We are pleased to complete this final step in preparation of the experiment assembly for irradiation testing," Lightbridge Vice President of Engineering Scott Holcombe said, describing it as a pivotal milestone for Lightbridge Fuel development. "This achievement brings us closer to obtaining the rigorous irradiation testing data required for regulatory approval and eventual commercialisation of Lightbridge Fuel."


Capsules containing Lightbridge Fuel material samples ready before loading into the assembly (Image: Lightbridge)

Lightbridge Fuel is described by the company as a proprietary next-generation nuclear fuel technology for existing light water reactors and pressurised heavy water reactors which it says significantly enhances reactor safety, economics, and proliferation resistance. It is also developing Lightbridge Fuel for new small modular reactors.

ATR is a pressurised water reactor which produces neutrons, rather than heat, and is used to perform irradiation testing of many nuclear materials and fuels. The irradition testing is being carried out under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between Lightbridge and INL.

INL has shared further images of the process to load the capsules into the experimental assembly.

Grossi says progress made on restoring Zaporizhzhia power


The two sides in the war have "engaged in a constructive way" with the International Atomic Energy Agency, whose director general says "a process has been set in motion" to help restore external power to Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.
 
The IAEA has had experts at the plant since September 2022 (Image: IAEA)

Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said: "Following intensive consultations, the process leading to the re-establishment of off-site power - through the Dniprovska and Ferosplavna-1 lines - has started. While it will still take some time before the grid connection of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant (ZNPP) has been restored, the two sides have engaged with us in a constructive way to achieve this important objective for the sake of nuclear safety and security. No one stands to gain from a further deterioration in this regard."

External power was lost by the plant - which is on the frontline of Ukrainian and Russian troops - on 23 September, and it has since been relying on its fleet of emergency diesel generators for the power required for essential safety functions, including powering cooling pumps.

Before the war, there were 10 different external power lines to the plant, but that number has fallen since the start of the war in February 2022. Five months ago its last 330 kV backup power line was disconnected, leaving no supply when the sole operational 750 kV power line source was cut.

Both sides blame the damage on military activities and have said that the military situation has stopped them from being able to repair the damage. Grossi has had frequent contact with both sides as part of efforts to find a way forward.

The IAEA's latest update says: "The focus has been on creating the necessary security conditions for repairs to be carried out on the damaged sections of the 750 kV Dniprovska and the 330 kV Ferosplavna-1 power lines, located on opposite sides of the frontline near the ZNPP."

It is the tenth time that the plant has lost external power, although on previous occasions it was for a matter of hours rather than the current case of weeks. Seven emergency diesel generators are operating, with 13 on standby.

The IAEA team at the plant report that there has been no temperature increase within the coolant in the reactors or the used fuel pools and radiation levels at the site remain normal. They do continue to hear military action, including on Tuesday evening when they heard "five explosions one after the other, occurring close to the site and shaking windows in their building".

The six-unit Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant has been under Russian military control since early March 2022. All its units are shut down.

Excavation works begin for Uzbekistan small modular reactor

About 1.5 million cubic metres of soil will be excavated during the digging of a pit 13 metres deep for the RITM-200N small modular reactor being built in Uzbekistan.
 
This will be the location for one of the world's first SMRs (Image: Rosatom)

The first cubic metres of soil were excavated in a ceremony attended by Pavel Bezrukov, vice president and director of the construction project at Atomstroyexport JSC, Abdujamil Kalmuratov, Head of the Directorate for the Construction of a Nuclear Power Plant State Enterprise, and Ulugbek Mustafoyev, Governor of the Jizzakh region.

Alexei Likhachev, director general of Rosatom, said during the event: "Today marks the beginning of a new phase in the implementation of the nuclear power generation project in Uzbekistan. As with all our international projects, the construction is designed with a high degree of localisation. The work is being carried out by Uzbek subcontractors. Rosatom will build the plant, which will have a service life of at least 60 years, and will provide all necessary support during its operation. We look forward to many decades of fruitful and mutually beneficial cooperation."


Rosatom's director general took part in the event via video-link (Image: Rosatom)

Uzbekistan's Uzatom said that 27 test and research boreholes have been drilled, with engineering surveys and design and preparatory works under way and a plan for design documentaton to be submitted for review by the end of the year, with first concrete for the first SMR unit expected to be poured in March 2026.

Rosatom began manufacturing reactor equipment in May, with a 205-tonne ingot of special alloy steel cast which will form the reactor vessel.

And an agreement was signed at the end of September during World Atomic Week in Moscow which multiplied the capacity of the proposed project to include two large units - VVER-1000s - in addition to two 55 MW RITM-200N SMRs. Originally the plan had been for up to six SMRs.

The RITM-200N is a water-cooled reactor adapted from nuclear-powered icebreakers' technology, with power of 190 MWt or 55 MWe and with an intended service life of 60 years. The first unit is scheduled to go critical in late 2029.

It is the first export order for Russia's SMR. The first land-based version is currently being built in Yakut, Russia, with the launch of the first unit scheduled for 2027. Rosatom says that its combination of active and passive safety systems means the SMR plants will achieve the highest possible safety standards.

Meanwhile, according to Russia's Tass news agency, negotiations are under way targeting a spring 2026 scheduled signing of a contract for the GW-scale units, with one of the issues being agreement that there would be at least 70% localisation of workers on the project.

Long-term safety at Armenian plant assessed


The operator of the Armenian Nuclear Power Plant at Metsamor has made progress in taking measures to ensure safe long-term operation, an International Atomic Energy Agency team of experts has concluded.
 
The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (Image: ANPP)

The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant (ANPP) comprises two Russian-built 376 MWe VVER reactors which started operating in 1976 and 1980, respectively. Both units were taken offline in 1988 due to safety concerns regarding seismic vulnerability, although they both continued to operate and had not sustained any damage in a major earthquake in the region earlier that year. Unit 2 was restarted in 1995, and is subject to ongoing safety improvements. Unit 1 is now being decommissioned.

In October 2021, the Armenian Nuclear Regulatory Authority (ANRA) issued a permit to the operator to continue operating unit 2 until September 2026. This is beyond the originally granted licence, which was until the end of 2021. The operator has requested permission from ANRA to operate the unit for an additional 10 years, until September 2036.

A Safety Aspects of Long-Term Operation (SALTO) peer review is a comprehensive safety review addressing strategy and key elements for the safe long-term operation (LTO) of nuclear power plants. SALTO missions complement IAEA Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) missions which are designed as a review of programmes and activities essential to operational safety. SALTO peer reviews can be carried out at any time during the lifetime of a nuclear power plant, though according to the IAEA the most suitable time lies within the last 10 years of the plant's originally foreseen operating period. SALTO and OSART reviews are carried out at the request of the IAEA Member State in which the review is to take place.

An IAEA team completed a ten-day SALTO mission to the Armenian plant on 9 October, which built upon a previous SALTO mission in 2018 and a follow-up mission held in 2021. The ten-person team included experts from Argentina, the Netherlands, Romania, Ukraine, the UK and the USA, as well as two IAEA staff members and two observers from Hungary and the World Association of Nuclear Operators.

"The plant has clearly made progress since previous missions and has done a lot to address the previous SALTO findings," said team leader and IAEA Nuclear Safety Officer Bryce Lehman, who noted that many ageing management and LTO activities were in alignment with IAEA safety standards. "We encourage the plant to continue implementing the remaining activities for LTO and to address the review findings."

The team identified good performances that will be shared with the nuclear industry globally, including: continuously improving organisational practices, adopting international best practices and experience from the first LTO period to improve the approach and documentation for the upcoming second LTO period; conducting periodic reviews of the seismic qualification programme, considering the latest knowledge and international operating experience; and implementing a comprehensive modernisation process performed by the staff of the plant.

The team also provided suggestions and recommendations to further improve safe LTO, for example, the plant should: update the existing plant programmes to fully address ageing management for the upcoming second LTO period; complete the qualification programme for equipment in harsh environments and fully implement it for LTO; and effectively implement the ageing management programmes for civil structures.

"We appreciate the IAEA's support in ageing management and preparation for our second LTO period," said ANPP Chief Engineer Artur Grigoryan. "It is very important for us to get an external review of our ageing management activities. The competencies and experience of the IAEA team will help us identify areas for improvement. The results of this mission will help us improve our activities for safe LTO and further align our activities with IAEA safety standards."

A draft report has been provided to plant management and ANRA. They have the opportunity to make factual comments on the draft, with the final report to be submitted to them and the Armenian government within three months.

Dismantling of Hamaoka 1 reactor under way


Japanese utility Chubu Electric Power Company announced it has removed the upper lid of the pressure vessel of unit 1 at its Hamaoka nuclear power plant as it begins to dismantle the reactor. Dismantling of the reactor of unit 2 at the plant began earlier this year.
 
The removal of the reactor pressure vessel lid of Hamaoka 1 (Image: Chubu)

Hamaoka 1 and 2 are both boiling water reactors, starting up in 1973 and 1978, respectively. Unit 1 had a capacity of 540 MWe while unit 2's capacity was 840 MWe. Chubu decided to close both units in January 2009 as they required expensive modifications to meet seismic standards imposed after the July 2007 Niigata Chuetsu offshore earthquake.

The utility submitted a decommissioning plan for Hamaoka 1 and 2 in June 2009, which was subsequently revised in September of that year. The overall plan divided the decommissioning of the two units into four stages. The first stage is for preparations for dismantling work at the units, while the second stage covers the dismantling and removal of equipment surrounding the reactors. The third stage is for the dismantling of the reactors themselves, while the fourth covers the demolition of buildings at both units.

The plan was approved by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry in November 2009, when Chubu began stage 1 of the decommissioning programme.

Having completed stage two work at both units, on 18 December last year the Nuclear Regulation Authority approved Chubu's application to move to the third stage of decommissioning at the units.

Chubu announced on 17 March that it had removed the upper lid of the pressure vessel of unit 2, marking the start of the dismantling of the reactor itself. As well as the reactor pressure vessel, the reactor internals and radiation shielding surrounding the vessel will be dismantled.

Hamaoka 1 and 2 are the first two commercial nuclear power reactors in Japan to enter the reactor dismantling phase.

Chubu plans to dismantle units 1 and 2 over a period of about 12 years, starting with the reactor of unit 2 first. The decommissioning of the two reactors is expected to be completed in fiscal 2042 after the reactor buildings are demolished.


 

Nova Minerals secures land for Alaska antimony refinery

A drill rig on the Estelle project northwest of Anchorage, Alaska. Credit: Nova Minerals

Nova Minerals (NASDAQ, ASX: NVA) shares soared after the company announced it has secured a land use permit for its proposed antimony refinery in Alaska, placing it another step closer to becoming a key supplier of the critical mineral in the US.

According to a press release issued on Friday, the permit covers 42.81 acres of commercial industrial zoned land near Port MacKenzie (Port Mac), an industrial hub designed as a bulk commodity export facility for industries like mining, and the only port in the state with over 9,000 acres dedicated to commercial and industrial development and growth.

The land use permit, the Australia-based company said, would allow it to establish downstream antimony processing and refining operations in Alaska’s Mat-Su Borough, an area with ready infrastructure for rapid development. The refinery site at Port Mac is strategically aligned with the fast-progressing West Susitna Access Road and other regional development projects currently underway, it added.

With the permit secured, the company said it is now actively negotiating with the US government on additional funding to build the facility. Earlier this month, Nova Minerals was awarded $43.4 million by the US Department of War to support this project.

“With the land use permit secured and the Department of War award, we are rapidly advancing our vision to become the leading US miner and producer of refined antimony products — strategic, secure, and proudly made in the USA,” Nova CEO Christopher Gerteisen stated.

“We are fast-tracking Phase 1 production of military-spec antimony, targeting delivery of our first product to the Department of War within 24 months, underscoring our commitment to supporting critical national defense needs.”

Nova Minerals’ US-listed shares jumped by more than 10% to an all-time high of $24.86 on the announcement, taking its market capitalization to about $174 million.

Alaska antimony resource

The proposed refinery represents the next phase of Nova’s strategy of onshoring US antimony production by building a fully integrated, mine-to-processing production hub in Alaska. Its Port Mac facility is expected to produce a full range of antimony products, including antimony trisulfide, antimony trioxide and antimony metal, used by both the US military and in industrial applications.

Anchoring this strategy is the company’s district-scale, 10-million-oz. Estelle gold project. Historically, antimony mining in Alaska has been associated with its large gold deposits. The Estelle project is located within the Tintina gold belt known to host significant antimony deposits in the past and was once a supply of the mineral to the North American market.

Nova’s team has so far identified four large, near-surface gold deposits on the 514 km² property, and only recently discovered antimony coincident with the gold in surface sampling on numerous prospects, elevating the project’s status as a critical mineral play that aligns with the Trump administration’s strategy.

While no resource has yet been established for antimony, the company has said it plans to publish a resource estimate for the critical mineral some time this year.

 

Zimbabwe pushes mineral processing as it takes aim at corruption


Stock image.

Zimbabwe pledged to crack down on illicit commodities trading and introduce rules to encourage downstream processing, as the nation seeks a greater share of the benefits from its natural resources.

Vice President Constantino Chiwenga told mining executives in the country’s second-biggest city, Bulawayo, that Zimbabwe remains “open for business, not for extraction.” He said corruption and illicit “leakages” were “cancers,” and that mining must drive industrialization and create jobs.

“To the processors and off takers, the era of raw mineral exports must give way to beneficiation and value addition,” Chiwenga said. “Government will implement strict regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure that corruption within the mining sector is effectively addressed and eradicated.”

Resource nationalism is strengthening across Africa as government seek a bigger share of the revenue and profits from resources mined by foreign companies. Mining contributes 70% of Zimbabwe’s export earnings through shipments of gold, platinum, lithium and chrome.


However, the Treasury loses millions of dollars in tax and royalty revenues from the smuggling of gold and other minerals. Most of Zimbabwe’s gold is produced by small-scale miners, who at times get paid late by the state’s sole authorized buyer, Fidelity Gold Refinery, pushing some to use other channels.

(By Godfrey Marawanyika)


 

Botswana enforces new 24% local ownership rule for mines

The Karowe mine in Botswana: Source: Lucara Diamond

Botswana has enforced a new rule requiring mining companies to sell a 24% stake in new concessions to local investors if the government chooses not to buy the stake, its mines ministry said on Friday.

The rule was proposed last year as part of draft legislation, but the government had not said when it would take effect.

The Mines and Minerals Act previously gave Botswana’s government the right to buy a 15% shareholding in any mining concession upon being licensed, with an option for a higher stake in diamond projects.

The Southern African country is the world’s top diamond producer by value and an emerging copper mining hotspot.

The Ministry of Minerals and Energy said in a statement that the rule requiring 24% local ownership in mining projects had entered into force on October 1.

As well as increasing local ownership of the country’s mineral wealth, the law aims to promote local value-adding activities and ensure mining companies establish environmental rehabilitation funds.

When the amendment to the Mines and Minerals Act was being debated in parliament, the former mines minister said local investors could buy stakes in concessions with the help of domestic pension funds.

(By Brian Benza; Editing by Anathi Madubela, Alexander Winning and Mark Potter)

 

BHP-China iron ore standoff may drag into 2026 as talks stall

BHP’s Newman operations in Western Australia

A price dispute between mining giant BHP Group and China’s state-run iron ore buyer risks dragging on for months, and even into early 2026, as both sides remain locked in stalemate.

So far, the world’s largest miner has seen minimal disruption in its shipments to China, largely because the company has already sold most of its allocation of iron ore for November and December, according to people familiar with the matter.

The company put forward as many as 50 cargoes in the days after China Mineral Resources Group Co. ordered a suspension of purchases at the end of last month, they said. The shipments have been offered to international traders and at least one Chinese outfit, among others.

Any impact from CMRG’s effort to restrict BHP’s cargoes as part of their negotiation is likely to become apparent only after the company begins selling ore for January delivery, a process that will begin from next month. That interval could give BHP room for maneuver in the talks, the people said, asking not to be identified while discussing private commercial matters.

China is by far the world’s largest consumer of iron ore, while BHP is one of three major suppliers that provide the bulk of the material to the country’s steelmakers. Bloomberg News reported last week that CMRG had asked major domestic buyers, including steel mills and state-owned trading houses, to suspend purchases of any new dollar-denominated seaborne cargoes from BHP.

The move escalated an earlier suspension of Jimblebar blend fines and marked a tougher stance from CMRG in its push for more leverage in talks. The state-run company, established three years ago to bolster China’s position in talks with BHP, Rio Tinto Group and Vale SA, has been pushing to sign long-term contracts on behalf of the country’s main steel mills, according to the people. This would help Beijing to negotiate discounts and other preferential measures.

“China wants to assert control over pricing after years of frustration at being the world’s biggest buyer, but still having little say over the price,” said Marina Zhang, researcher at the University of Technology Sydney’s Australia-China Relations Institute. “It’s also a signal to the rest of the world that China intends to play by new rules.”

While CMRG has no formal authority over the commercial operations of individual mills or traders, its recommendations have effectively become binding because of the group’s political clout and strategic significance within the government hierarchy.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last week that he wants the issue to be resolved quickly, noting that iron ore “makes a major contribution to China’s economy but also to Australia’s.”

CMRG didn’t respond to a request for comment. A BHP spokesperson said the company didn’t comment on commercial negotiations.

(By Katharine Gemmell and Alfred Cang)

ANTI GREEN REVANCHISM

Australia’s coal state reverses plan to close power plants


Bayswater power generation plant. Stock image.

Queensland, the Australian state that exports about one-eighth of the world’s coal, has said it plans to keep its power stations that burn the fossil fuel open for longer, threatening the nation’s ambitious goal to more than double renewable generation by the end of the decade.

The former government’s “ideological decision to close coal units by 2035, regardless of their condition, is officially abolished,” Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki said in a statement. “Queensland’s coal-fired fleet is the youngest in the country and state-owned coal generators will continue to operate for as long as they are needed in the system and supported by the market.”

The move comes as global coal consumption rises to a record year after year, despite efforts to boost deployment of renewables and curb emissions. US President Donald Trump has led a push to prop up the industry, while other major polluters such as China and India also continue to dig up more of the dirtiest fossil fuel.

Queensland is pledging A$1.6 billion ($1.1 billion) over the next five years into state-owned coal, hydro and gas power plants to keep the assets open for longer, according to an energy roadmap released by its government on Friday. Running coal assets to their technical life rather than closing them early would reduce system investment costs by about A$26 billion to 2035, it said.

However, the plan sends “uncertain signals for future investment in Queensland’s clean energy supply” and imperils Australia’s goal to reduce emissions between 62% and 70% on 2005 levels by 2035, said BloombergNEF analyst Sahaj Sood.

Queensland has been hard-hit by the effects of climate change in recent years, including more frequent cyclones and floods, along with heat-induced bleaching of the iconic Great Barrier Reef.

The roadmap also attracted criticism from climate groups, including WWF’s Australian branch, which described it as “short-sighted.”

“This is a roadmap to more fires, floods and heat waves, and more mass-bleaching events,” chief regenerative officer Nicole Forrester said in a statement.

Coal is a significant part of Queensland’s economy. The state exported A$45.8 billion of the metal-making and power-station fuel in the year through May and earned A$5.5 billion of royalties in the financial year through June. However, miners including BHP Group Ltd. and Anglo American Plc last month announced closures, citing lower prices and rising costs, including higher royalties.

Rio Tinto Plc said earlier this month that the venture that owns the state’s biggest power plant may close it in 2029, six years earlier than previously announced. State-owned companies operate all but one of the remaining seven coal fired plants, and earlier this year Queensland said it would extend one of them — threatening a pledge by the previous administration to end generation using the fuel by 2035.

Queensland’s Coal Power PlantsCapacity (MW)OperatorCommissionedLatest Closure Date (AEMO)
Callide B700CS Energy19882031
Callide C844CS Energy2001N/A
Gladstone1,680NRG Energy Inc.19762029
Kogan Creek744CS Energy20072042
Millmerran852Genuity20032051
Stanwell1,460Stanwell Corp.19932043-2046
Tarong1,400Stanwell Corp.19862036-2037
Tarong North450Stanwell Corp.20032037

Queensland is one of Australia’s most coal-dependent states — generating 65% of its electricity needs in 2024 from the fuel, according to BloombergNEF. The state’s Liberal National Party won office last year after running on a platform to repeal the previous Labor government’s commitment to end reliance on state-owned coal-fired power and achieve 80% renewable energy penetration by 2035.

The state will also add as much as 6.8 gigawatts of new wind and solar projects, 0.6 gigawatts of gas generation and 3.8 gigawatts of storage by 2030, the Queensland government said.

(By Rob Verdonck and Stephen Stapczynski)

Argentina mining investment on pause as midterm elections loom

Javier Milei. Credit: Vox España | Wikimedia Commons, under licence CC0 1.0.

Political uncertainty ahead of Argentina’s October midterm elections is holding back investment decisions in the mining sector, the country’s main industry group said on Thursday, warning that instability and unclear policy signals are delaying project development.

“No one is going to make any decisions these days. That’s crystal clear,” said Roberto Cacciola, president of the Argentine Chamber of Mining Companies (CAEM), in a meeting with journalists.

Argentina is set to hold midterm elections on October 26, a crucial test for President Javier Milei as he enters the second half of his term amid falling approval ratings and stalled legislation in an opposition-controlled Congress.


Cacciola said the national government must resume dialogue with provincial governors – who control mineral resources under Argentine law – to restore investor confidence and ensure governability.

Argentina is a major producer of gold, silver and lithium, with significant copper reserves that remain untapped.

CAEM estimated that Argentina will register record mining exports of $5.09 billion in 2025, representing a 14% increase compared to 2024, of which 80% corresponds to gold, followed by 14% of lithium and 12% silver.

However, gold output is projected to fall 10% year-on-year and is down 39% from 2018 levels.

In lithium, production is set to rise 54% in 2025, with exports up 43%, though global oversupply and rising domestic costs have slowed some projects.

“The price drop is delaying construction of some planned projects,” Cacciola said. “There are no major layoffs, but there are early signs of restructuring.”

Cacciola called on the government to scrap export duties on gold, lithium and silver and withholding taxes on gold and silver, and urged clarity on a law that determines the scope of glaciers to be protected and infrastructure investment to boost sector competitiveness.

(By Lucila Sigal; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

CU

Community blasts NGO over role in Cobre Panama mine closure

The Cobre Panama copper mine has been closed since November 2023. (Image courtesy of Cobre Panama.)

Communities near First Quantum Minerals’ (TSX: FM) Cobre Panamá copper mine are accusing a leading environmental NGO of fuelling political unrest and failing to support those most affected by the operation’s 2023 closure.

In a letter to the Packard Foundation, which has granted over $400,000 to the Environmental Advocacy Centre (Centro de Incidencia Ambiental-CIAM), the Civic Community Committee (CCC) alleges that funds meant for community development were diverted toward political activism. 

The foundation’s own disclosures show CIAM received $45,000 in 2022, $180,000 in 2023, and another $180,000 planned for 2025.

The CCC argues that none of these funds have translated into tangible benefits for the thousands of residents who lost livelihoods when the mine shut down. Instead, the group says CIAM helped trigger the closure by leading the lawsuit that overturned the contract between First Quantum’s subsidiary, Minera Panamá, and the Panamanian state.

According to the committee, CIAM’s actions fuelled mass protests in 2023, leading to the loss of over 1,500 formal jobs. The group also pointed to the abrupt halt of scholarships, training, and youth programs in sports, culture, and entrepreneurship – initiatives which once anchored social progress in the region.

The CCC also claims CIAM has not visited the affected communities since the mine shut down, focusing instead on political alliances and social media campaigns that promote a partisan agenda.

“Their actions have created more poverty, division, and frustration among those of us who live here, the exact opposite of what they preach,” the letter, quoted by Panama America, states.

Talks on the table

Commerce Minister Julio Moltó said in September that negotiations on Cobre Panamá’s potential reopening could begin in late 2025 or early 2026, pending the results of a comprehensive audit. The review, led by SGS Panama Control Services, will evaluate the mine’s environmental, social, and economic impact, including future employment prospects.

Moltó emphasized that reopening Cobre Panamá is President José Raúl Mulino’s second-highest priority, after pension reform, which is already underway. He also noted that Minera Panamá and its affiliates have suspended international arbitration against the Panamanian state, creating an opening for potential dialogue.

Labour groups back the move. Aniano Pinzón, general secretary of the General Union of Workers (UGT), said the union supports reopening efforts to restore lost jobs and reignite the national economy.

Economic pillar

Before its closure, Cobre Panamá ranked among the world’s top copper producers, delivering 350,000 tonnes in 2022. The mine contributed about 5% of Panama’s GDP, and First Quantum estimates the halt has cost the country up to $1.7 billion in lost economic activity.

Mine workers, contractors, unions, and surrounding communities continue to push for a restart, citing its critical role in the national economy. The government insists no decision will be made until the audit is completed.

First Quantum has kept the site in standby mode, prepared to resume operations if an agreement is reached.

A site visit by MINING.COM earlier this year found the once-bustling operation now cloaked in silence, its machinery idle beneath the encroaching jungle.