Tuesday, July 07, 2026

Desperately Missing Susan

July 7, 2026

Susan George. Photo: Transnational Institute.

Susan George passed away in February of this year. It is good to have waited this long for the movement to give her a proper send-off, for we have finally absorbed the shock of her departure and realized what a jewel we have lost.

What can one say about Susan George in 15 minutes? One can just scratch the surface of a truly multi-faceted life and personality. Only a biography will do her justice, and I hope one of her many admirers will do one soon.

But let me begin by saying that Susan wrote at least 15 books, all of them of great importance to the progressive movement, two of which definitely belong to the great books of political economy in the last half century, How the Other Half Dies and A Fate Worse than Debt.

In her work, Susan showed her thorough grasp of the dynamics of capitalism not by abstract theorizing but by showing how, in the concrete, they worked to wreak such devastating consequences on the lives of billions of people, especially on those in the Global South. She had a sure command of the analysis. She had a sure command of the numbers. And she had a sure command of the language, one marked by beauty, wit, and urgency.

This combination made her one of the most effective educators at a time that people were trying to make sense of the head-spinning changes that global capitalism was putting them through in the age of neoliberalism.

She was a master of several genres, including satire. The Lugano Report might be viewed as being a contemporary take on Jonathan Swift’s eighteenth-century classic, A Modest Proposal, where he famously proposed that the families of poor Irish families could be improved if they sold their numerous children to be made into delicious dishes that could be eaten by the rich. Imagining herself as a committee tasked with coming up with measures to preserve capitalism in the twenty-first century, she recommended “eschewing the Auschwitz solution” and resorting to more “humane” measures to radically reduce the numbers in a world that was 40 percent overpopulated, like making “reproductive inhibition” via chemical and other means part of the conditionalities for economic assistance programs in the Global South, the natural consequence of which would be a great reduction of pressures to replace market capitalism.

The Lugano Report was graced with sparkling examples of George’s wit, as were her other books. I am grateful to Claudio Schuftan for compiling a list of some of her best quotes, among them:

Unstable financial markets do not behave rationally; they can also create losers on a scale which would today make the 1930s look like a bad day at the races.

For the poor, children are like lottery tickets: one may succeed in life and change the status of the whole family

The Invisible Hand is thwarted by the Invisible Womb

The doctrine of Liberalism is akin to that of the Gospel: many are called, only a few are chosen

Markets discipline instantly; they hold, as it were, permanent elections

Happily, few politicians are heroes

Big money is nomadic and travels at the speed of bytes

While ignorance and stupidity must be given their due, most things come out the way they do, because the powerful want them to come out that way

Susan was not an academic, though she had a doctorate from the University of Paris. Thank god, she decided that her role was to be an educator outside the four walls of the university, to be an agitator, an activist.

Among her many memorable achievements was her role in co-founding the Amsterdam-based Transnational Institute in 1973, of which she was president at the time of her passing in February of this year. It was at TNI that I met her back in the early 1990s and came under her spell, as did so many others who were fellows and associates of that wonderful hotbed of ideas.

She worked with many movements, among them ATTAC in France, and generously shared her time with many others. She was at her best with big audiences and at mass rallies. I heard her agitate the crowd in Seattle in late November 1999 at a historic teach-in organized by the International Forum on Globalization. She was again at it in that other landmark anti-globalization rally that drew hundreds of thousands in Genoa in June 2001. She was charismatic, but she did not set out to cultivate inspiration, charming an audience instead with her persuasive analysis, her often caustic wit, the elegance of her delivery, and the strength of her conviction.

She was generous with her praise, but she was not uncritical. She was frank and always made sure to accompany praise with constructive criticism. For instance, in endorsing the book Dark Victory that I co-authored with Shea Cunningham and Bill Rau in 1994, she said, “One could wish that Bello at al had made more of the complicity of Southern elites who, on the whole, lie back and enjoy rollback because they, too, profit hugely from it. A North versus South, Empire versus Barbarian scenario, yes, but another serious player is the transnational elite to match transnational capital, sitting pretty at the top, with everyone else underneath. The world-as-sphere, North-South, is also world-as-pyramid and those at the apex are not all white.” She was right, of course.

Susan was an internationalist at a time that internationalism was under assault from right-wing nationalism that put the blame for the troubles of the Global North on migrants. Although she devoted most of her work to showing how capitalism was destroying the Global South, she also considered herself a European and campaigned for the creation of a progressive, non-neoliberal Europe. Indeed, she also found time to endorse and campaign for preferred candidates in the U.S. elections. Like her ideas, her activism knew no borders.

I got to know Susan better when I interviewed her while preparing her nomination for the Right Livelihood Award, also known as the Alternative Nobel Prize, in 2005. One thing I learned was that she went to Smith College, one of the leading finishing schools for women of the upper class in the United States, that she was, in fact, descended from the patrician upper class in the United States and had enjoyed all the privileges of that class growing up and inherited its style. It was a class style that she put to good use in battling the representatives of capitalism later in life. Few men of the global elite dared go up against her in public debate, since she could devastate them not only with her arguments but with a gaze that said “I know what you are since I came from where you came.”

Susan did not get the Right Livelihood Award, and both of us were quite disappointed she didn’t. But she did get the equally prestigious Outstanding Public Scholar Award from the International Studies Association in 2007.

I need to end, and I will do so by invoking the three Cs in summing up Susan George, the thinker and global personality.

She was courageous in taking on the task of unmasking capitalism at a time that the establishment was saying “There is no alternative” to neoliberalism, a perspective to which the established progressive parties and many thinkers of the left had capitulated.

She was consistent in her opposition to capital till the very end, and she lived to see this pay off with the collapse of neoliberalism and globalization after 2008.

She was a class act, unique in her elegance, style, and wit.

She will be missed. Sorely.

Walden Bello, a columnist for Foreign Policy in Focus, is the author or co-author of 26 books, the latest of which are Global Battlefields: Memoir of a Legendary Public Intellectual from the Global South (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2025), Paper Dragons: China and the Next Crash (United Kingdom: Bloomsbury, 2019), and Counterrevolution: The Global Rise of the Far Right (Halifax: Fernwood Press, 2019).



Fathers Closing the Gap on Parental Leave

July 6, 2026

Paid leave has gained significant support from researchers and policymakers across the political spectrum. Paid family and medical leave (PFML), which allows parents to bond with a new baby, acknowledges the important role of childbirth in women’s lives as they strive to balance work and family responsibilities. And while it benefits all families, paid leave can be particularly valuable for vulnerable populations with limited resources. Parents and other family caregivers experience psychosocial stress and opportunity costs due to the competing demands of labor market participation and household caregiving responsibilities. Paid leave can mitigate these stresses.

Another positive development associated with greater availability of paid family leave is the increased use of paid leave by fathers following the birth of a child, an area that has received relatively little attention. Recent claims data indicate that in states where paid leave programs have been implemented, men’s use of paid leave to bond with a newborn has risen in recent years. Indeed, the availability of paid leave for working men may enhance the quality and stability of couple relationships and promote father’s involvement from the early stages of a child’s life.

Figure 1

In fact, the gender difference in paid family leave usage at the time of a child’s birth has narrowed substantially over time (see Figure 1). Analyzing data from the Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation, we see that among parents employed before the birth of their first child, women consistently use paid family or parental leave more than men nationwide. For the cohort with children born before 1994, approximately 29 percent of women utilized paid parental leave, compared to only about 4.5 percent of men. By 2014 to 2024, though, the proportion increased to roughly 33 percent for women and about 27 percent for men. The gap became much smaller (6 percentage points difference in the recent decade) relative to the 24 percentage points gap between women and men for the pre-1994 cohort. This is partly due to the increased availability of paid family leave, as well as changes in behavior.

Figure 2

Figure 2 shows the most substantial change occurs among men. Fathers’ paid parental leave increases by approximately 22 percentage points, while mothers’ rises by less than 4 points. Meanwhile, the proportion of men not taking any leave drops by half (from 77 percent to 35 percent), compared to a modest decline among women from 16 percent to 11 percent.

Fathers also tend to use vacation or other paid leave more often at the birth of a child, while mothers more frequently take unpaid or disability leave. Over the past decades, unpaid leave has remained at 22–26 percent for women, compared to about 12 percent for men in recent years. Disability leave is also more common among women, reflecting childbirth-related complications.

States with Paid Leave Saw Most Significant Increases

In states and the District of Columbia where paid leave is widely available, the increase in usage among fathers was significantly higher than among mothers (see Figure 3). Fathers’ use of paid parental leave rose from approximately 3 percent to 32 percent, a 29-percentage point increase. In comparison, mothers’ usage increased to 41 percent, only 8 percentage points higher than the pre-1994 cohort. Additionally, men in PFML states became less likely to forgo leave, with the decline in non-use accelerating after 2014 as new state programs were introduced. Initially, about 76 percent of fathers in these states took no leave, compared to fewer than 18 percent of mothers. By 2014 to 2024, the proportion not taking leave dropped to about one-third among fathers and 10 percent among mothers.

Figure 3

Similar trends are observed among parents in non-PFL states, though to a lesser extent (see Figure 4). Among men, leave-taking behavior has changed quite a bit over time. The proportion of fathers taking paid family leave to bond with their baby increased from about 5 percent for those with children born before 1994 to approximately 25 percent for new fathers in the 2014–2024 cohort. In comparison, about one-third (32 percent) of fathers in PL states took paid leave in the most recent cohort. Use of unpaid leave and vacation or other types of leave also rose modestly among new fathers without access to state-wide PFL programs. Meanwhile, the share of fathers who did not take any leave declined sharply from nearly 78 percent to about 35 percent.

Figure 4

Positive Trends Support Calls for a National Paid Leave Policy

A national paid leave program would benefit both employers and workers. It reduces turnover and has little adverse impact on productivity, while also promoting greater labor force attachment for women. It is also, as we noted in our Majority Agenda series, supported across the political spectrum. And there are good reasons to believe that the rapid growth in fathers’ leave take-up would benefit women even more in their labor market activities after childbirth.

As we observe here, much of the gender convergence occurs in states with paid leave programs. The most striking finding is that fathers in states with this policy are substantially more likely to move away from the “not taking leave” category. Although women continue to use leave at higher rates, their leave-taking behavior changes only slightly over time, both nationally and in states with these policies. Men have made significant progress in closing the historical gap.

However, expanding paid leave in more states is less about addressing gender differences and more about supporting all parents, particularly new fathers. As additional states adopt paid leave initiatives and workplace culture evolves, men may increasingly feel empowered to take leave in order to spend time with newborns regardless of geographic location. This shift could also influence social attitudes and levels of approval among state residents.

This first appeared on CEPR.

Julie Yixia Cai is an economist at CEPR focusing on household income volatility, precarious work, economic inequality, and poverty measurement.