Showing posts sorted by date for query LNG PRINCE RUPERT. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query LNG PRINCE RUPERT. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, February 01, 2026

LNG

Owner of B.C. ghost town taking another swing at energy exports

ByThe Canadian Press
February 01, 2026 

Businessman Krishnan Suthanthiran poses for a photo in Calgary, Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026. Suthanthiran, who owns the one-time company town of Kitsault, B.C., is trying to interest government in the site as an energy export terminal. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Larry MacDougal (Larry MacDougal)

Krishnan Suthanthiran is trying to make Kitsault, B.C., happen — again.

The Indian-born, U.S.-based medical technology entrepreneur says he spent about US$7 million two decades ago to purchase the uninhabited one-time mining town at the end of a scenic fiord. Some media reports have cited a lower purchase price.

His early plans for Kitsault included an eco-resort, an arts and science centre and a movie studio. In 2013, Suthanthiran turned his sights to energy, floating a plan for a liquefied natural gas export terminal.

None of those ideas have panned out and the town, about 140 kilometres northeast of Prince Rupert, B.C., remains mostly vacant.

But Suthanthiran believes Kitsault’s time as an energy hub has finally come, as trade and geopolitical upheaval focus political attention on boosting oil and gas exports to non-U.S. markets.


His latest pitch is to build two pipelines connecting Alberta to the coast, one for natural gas and one for crude oil. The oil and natural gas, in the form of liquid butanol, would be exported across the Pacific from a marine terminal near Kitsault.

He came armed with a pile of glossy brochures touting Kitsault’s housing and infrastructure offerings late last month when he visited Calgary, where he said he had meetings with Alberta energy ministry staff.

“I truly believe that this is the right thing for Canada and this is the right thing for the First Nations,” the 78-year-old told The Canadian Press in an interview.
The town

Kitsault’s life as a bustling mining town was brief.

Amax Canada Development Ltd. opened a molybdenum mine nearby in 1981. The town it built for workers once boasted 1,200 residents.

But shortly thereafter, the market tanked for molybdenum, an ore used in steelmaking, and the mine shut down. By the end of 1983, Kitsault was empty. It has remained frozen in a 1980s time warp ever since.

When the town was put on the market in 2004, it came with 92 houses, complete with period decor. It also had a hospital with a never-used X-ray machine, a curling rink, swimming pool, library, theatre, shopping mall and pub. The Kitsault Energy brochure says the town has full B.C. Hydro power service.

Over the years, the town has only housed groundskeepers and a smattering of mining workers. Suthanthiran figures he spends $2 million a year to maintain it.
The businessman

A biography on Kitsault Energy’s website tells the story of Suthanthiran’s humble beginnings in India, where it says he sold candy to classmates so he could afford schoolbooks. The bio says he came to Canada in 1969 with $400 and studied engineering at Carleton University in Ottawa. Three years later, unable to find a suitable job in Canada, he moved to the U.S.


His father’s cancer death inspired his career path and he founded a family of companies under the TeamBest Global umbrella focused on equipment used in cancer diagnosis and treatment, the bio said.

Some have run into legal and labour trouble.

In one case dating back more than a decade, Belgian authorities sought Canada’s help executing search warrants related to a criminal investigation into Best Medical Belgium Inc., one of Suthanthiran’s companies. A 2017 Court of Appeal for Ontario decision says the Belgians were looking into allegations of misuse of company assets, concealing assets in insolvency, making false statements, using false documents and money laundering. Suthanthiran has denied wrongdoing. CBC reported last June that the investigation was ongoing.

Later, workers at another one of Suthanthiran’s companies, Best Theratronics in Ottawa, went on strike for almost 10 months amid a bitter pay dispute until an agreement was finally reached early last year. At the same facility, which made equipment used in radiation therapy, the company ran afoul of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission over the financial guarantee for decommissioning required under its licence.

When asked how his expertise figures into his oil and gas ambitions, Suthanthiran replied: “I’m an innovator, I’m an engineer.”
The plan

Suthanthiran wrote in an open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith last month outlining a vision to “elevate Canada’s role as a global energy leader.”

He is proposing a marine terminal at a deepwater port on Observatory Inlet, about 30 kilometres from the town site, from which tankers of crude would depart for Asia. He says the site would also have a floating facility to manufacture liquid butanol — a chemical with a wide range of uses, including as a fuel — from natural gas. Suthanthiran says it’s a more cost-effective undertaking than LNG, which requires gas to be chilled into a liquid in ultra-cold temperatures.

Along the same inlet, but closer to the Pacific, the Nisga’a Nation and industry partners are planning the floating Ksi Lisims LNG development, which is being expedited as a federal project of national importance.

Barry Prentice, a business professor at the University of Manitoba, said the waters leading to Kitsault are navigable and sheltered.

“From a marine perspective, I don’t see any red lights flashing,” said Prentice, who specializes in transport and supply chains.

The fact that the town is connected to utilities and already has housing available is a bonus, Prentice added.

“If the idea is to move fast on things, I can’t think of any site that would be able to move faster than that,” he said. “Some of the pieces of the puzzle are there.”

Heather Exner-Pirot, senior fellow at the Macdonald Laurier Institute, hadn’t heard of Kitsault as a port option.

“Prince Rupert comes up as a more obvious one, because they have the deep water ports and because they have capacity for the size of the operation that we’d expect,” she said.

Further south and inland, the port of Kitimat already has the LNG Canada terminal in operation and another, Cedar LNG, under construction.

“It is busy and probably constrained,” said Exner-Pirot.

The best bet, she said, is wherever the support from local First Nations is strongest.

“The most welcoming Indigenous nation on that coast would have a very good chance of attracting it.”
The moment

Suthanthiran believes the “stars are lined up” for his latest vision for Kitsault to succeed. The Canada-U.S. trade relationship has been rattled by tariff chaos and annexation threats. That’s honed political attention on boosting exports to markets besides the United States, by far the biggest buyer of Canadian oil and gas.

U.S. plans to boost Venezuelan oil production following the ouster of President Nicolas Maduro in January has intensified calls for Canada to ramp up energy exports to Asia via the West Coast.

The Alberta government is currently leading the charge for a new oilsands pipeline, committing $14 million to early work on a proposal to the federal major projects office, established last year to speed along infrastructure deemed in Canada’s national interest.

Smith has said the aim is for the private sector to eventually take on the project alongside First Nations partners. A sweeping energy agreement Smith and Carney signed late last year envisions a new bitumen pipeline being built in tandem with emissions-reducing measures.

Suthanthiran said Canadian industry remains “gun shy” about taking on such a project.

“Everybody is pointing a finger at somebody else. Who’s going to take the lead? It’s like a dance floor. Nobody wants to go first.”

Suthanthiran said he’s open to selling Kitsault and letting someone else take the reins.

“I don’t have to own the town forever.”

Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press


PM Carney, Alta. Premier Smith open to alternate oil pipeline routes

By Spencer Van Dyk
January 29, 2026 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Prime Minister Mark Carney both say they’re open to alternate routes for a potential pipeline to get Alberta oil to Asian markets, which does not necessarily need to end at B.C.’s northwest coast.

“Some of the alternatives are already emerging,” Smith told reporters in Ottawa on Thursday, when asked whether the northwest coast route is the only one being considered.

Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith both say they’re open to alternate routes for a potential pipeline to get Alberta oil to Asian markets, which does not necessarily need to end at B.C.’s northwest coast. (The Canadian Press combined photo)

She said several options to boost oil exports are currently being considered, including an expansion of Enbridge’s main line and exploring ways to better utilize old Keystone assets, among other ideas.

“North, south, east, west, we’re willing to go in every direction,” Smith said.

Smith has been at odds with B.C. Premier David Eby over the issue for months. In June, Eby said he wouldn’t support a new pipeline — arguing the Trans Mountain Expansion Project is already in place — to which Smith responded that she would “convince” him.

Prime Minister Mark Carney, right, signs an MOU with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith in Calgary,Thursday, Nov. 27, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Then, in November, Carney and Smith signed a historic memorandum of understanding (MOU) outlining the conditions that need to be met for a new oil pipeline to the Pacific to proceed.

In the MOU, Alberta agreed to negotiate an industrial carbon pricing agreement by April 2026, which would implement an industrial carbon price with a floor of $130 per tonne.

In return, the federal government has agreed not to implement the oil and gas emissions cap, to suspend the clean electricity regulations in the province, and if required, make an exemption to the federal tanker ban.

But Eby has been staunchly opposed to lifting the tanker ban, which was enacted in 2019 and prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude or persistent oil from docking, loading or unloading at ports on the B.C. north coast.
B.C. Premier David Eby, speaks during an announcement for new funding to support victims of crime, in Surrey, B.C. on Friday, Nov. 28, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns

“We are doing our work to put the project together by June, and we are hoping that the federal government can move swiftly on making a decision so we can get down to technical details on that,” Smith said on Thursday.

“I’m very confident that once approved, we will have one or more strong proponents in the private sector willing to work with us to build it.”

Asked to respond, Eby said Smith is “committed to keeping (B.C.) updated on her progress,” and that he looks forward to that.

Canada’s premiers are in Ottawa this week for a meeting of the Council of the Federation. On Thursday, they also collectively sat down with Carney, largely to discuss trade amid the ongoing trade war with the United States.

While they’re in town, a few also met with Carney separately, including Smith and Eby, who said pipelines were a topic of conversation.

The B.C. premier described the sit-down as “very civil,” and “borderline friendly.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney takes his seat at the First Ministers Meeting in Ottawa, Thursday, Jan. 29, 2026. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Carney said he wanted to “re-emphasize” that the MOU includes many other provisions, including cooperation on data centres, nuclear power, and inner ties.

“With respect to a route, and under the MOU, ‘a bitumen pipeline to Asian markets,’ is the way it’s described, and therefore the specific routes are not outlined,” Carney said.

“Of course, work is being done to explore the feasibility of various routes, and there are many factors that affect the feasibility, starting with Indigenous support, as well as technical and economic considerations,” he also said.

Alberta is currently acting as a proponent to fund the initial planning stages of a proposed bitumen pipeline to B.C. northwest coast, and Smith re-asserted her desire on Thursday to present a proposal to the Major Projects Office by June.

“We are hoping that the federal government can move swiftly on making a decision so we can get down to technical details on that,” Smith said. “I’m very confident that once approved, we will have one or more strong proponents in the private sector willing to work with us.”

A private proponent for a pipeline has yet to come forward.

With files from CTV News’ Stephanie Ha
Spencer Van Dyk

Writer & Producer, Ottawa News Bureau, CTV News


Shell, Mitsubishi exploring sale options for their stakes in LNG Canada: Reuters exclusive


By Reuters
January 16, 2026 



The Shell Oil logo and the logo of Mitsubishi Motors Corp in a combination photo. (AP Photo / Gene J. Puskar)

Oil company Shell and Japanese conglomerate Mitsubishi are exploring sale options for their respective stakes in the $40-billion LNG Canada project, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The moves come as owners of the massive liquefied natural gas facility weigh a potential expansion, and after another stakeholder, Petronas, successfully offloaded a piece of the project.

Shell, the largest owner with a 40-per-cent stake in LNG Canada, has been working with investment bankers at Rothschild & Co to sound out interested parties in recent weeks, said two of the sources. Two sources added that Shell could offload as much as three-quarters of its holding, or 30 per cent of the project.

Shell has expressed willingness, however, to consider different options relating to its exposure to the project’s Phase 1, which is operational, and the proposed Phase 2, given their different risks.

One of the sources estimated that any buyer for Shell’s stake could be committing roughly $20.9 billion, inclusive of the equity stake, debt and capital requirements for Phase 2.

Royal Bank of Canada signage is pictured in the financial district in Toronto on September 8, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Lahodynskyj

Mitsubishi hires RBC


Mitsubishi, which holds a 15-per-cent stake, has hired RBC Capital Markets as it weighs its options, two of the sources said, cautioning deliberations were early and any sale effort would not kick off until later this year. The sources did not elaborate on how much of its stake Mitsubishi could market.

All the sources said sales involving Shell and Mitsubishi were not guaranteed, and spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss confidential deliberations.

CTV News reached out to LNG Canada, which referred questions to Shell and Mitsubishi. Shell said they would not be commenting on this story, while Mitsubishi has not responded.

MidOcean, backed by investment firm EIG and Saudi Aramco, closed a deal in December to buy a fifth of the Petronas venture that held a 25-per-cent stake in LNG Canada.

PetroChina holds a 15-per-cent stake, while Korea Gas Corporation owns five per cent of LNG Canada.

A tanker being loaded with the first cargo of Canadian liquefied natural gas is shown at the port of Kitimat, B.C. on Saturday June 28, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout — LNG Canada (Mandatory Credit)

LNG Canada’s cost advantage

LNG Canada is the first major LNG facility in North America with direct access to the Pacific Coast. The project in Kitimat, B.C., has a supply cost advantage because prices for Canadian natural gas consistently trade at a discount to the U.S. Henry Hub benchmark.

Even so, existing and potential owners will consider industry fears of global oversupply of the supercooled fuel, as new LNG output comes online. Energy Transfer said in December that it was suspending development of its Lake Charles LNG export facility in Louisiana.


LNG Canada started production in June, but has since run into operational problems. Its second processing unit, known as Train 2, was down in December, nearly a month after its startup, two sources told Reuters

.
The terminus for the Coastal GasLink natural gas pipeline is seen at the LNG Canada export terminal under construction in Kitimat, B.C., on Sept. 28, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

When fully ramped up, Phase 1 will have the capacity to export 14 million metric tons of LNG per year.

Shell told potential bidders it will keep a gas contract with the terminal for 30 years, one source said.

Developers of major infrastructure projects often reduce their stakes once they become operational, allowing them to book profits and recycle cash into new ventures. Large investment firms and infrastructure funds are ready buyers of such stakes, as they like the projects’ steady revenue.

Shell, the world’s biggest LNG trader, said in March it targeted a four-to-five per cent annual increase in LNG sales over the next five years and one-per-cent annual production growth.

Shell and its partners were working toward a final investment decision for Phase 2, as soon as this year, which would double capacity.

By Arathy Somasekhar, David French and Andres Gonzalez, Reuters

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

TWO GOOD LOCAL HISTORY SITES FOR LEFT WING ALBERTA


Dec 20, 2022 — The Hunger March of 1932 is inextricably linked to the material and socio-economic conditions of Alberta during the Great Depression.

by Poundmaker staff member, Eugene (Devil inside) Plawiuk.13 In contrast to ... founding meeting of Canada's first national socialist party, the CCF, was held.
368 pages' 




 

Monday, May 02, 2016

THE ALBERTA NDP THE PARTY OF OIL WORKERS

THE COINCIDENTAL BIRTH OF THE NEW DEMOCRATS AND THE OIL INDUSTRY IN ALBERTA

Rachel Notley warned New Democrats that adopting the LEAP manifesto which demands the end of oil extraction from the Tar Sands as well as conventional and shale gas plays, and NO pipelines, would put the Eastern arm of the party in direct conflict with a party that is proudly Albertan and directly involved in the oil industry history in the province even more so than the long ruling party the PC’s.

It was the development of oil and energy in Alberta that created new wealth and a new industrial province after WWII. The discovery of oil not only brought the oil industry but also the oil and energy workers union, a small American union that had an arm in Alberta, the Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers OCAW. In Alberta it was beginning its organizing of workers in the field and in the new gas and chemical plants being built between Edmonton and Fort Saskatchewan.

This was the post war boom, the party in power was Social Credit, and while  there was no NDP there was an active labour political movement housed in the AFL and Edmonton Trades and Labour Council, members belonged to the Communist Party, the CCF and some still belonged to the OBU and IWW.

Edmonton had a history of electing labour council members as Mayor, Aldermen (women), school board trustees and Hospital Board members. Elmer Roper  longtime labour activist, CCF activist and candidate, owner of ABC Printing and publisher of Alberta Labour News would be elected Mayor of Edmonton after the creation of the NDP by the merger of the CCF with the newly created post war Canadian Labour Congress.

The sixties saw the growth of the labour movement in Canada and in Alberta, including the creation of an active movement of organizing public sector workers, provincially, municipally and federally. The Federal Workers Union originating in Calgary would merge with the Ontario based National Workers Union to create what we know as the Canadian Union of Public  Employees, the Civil Service Union of Alberta would become a union known as the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees.

But throughout the oil boom of the fifties and sixties the union most associated with the provincial NDP was the Oil Chemical and Atomic Energy Workers Union under the leadership of Neil Reimer and his assistant Reg Baskin

That’s right the party was brought to life in Alberta by Oil Workers in the provinces new Energy market. Its first party leader was Neil Reimer, who would meet a charismatic young politician a contemporary of Peter Lougheed and Joe Clark at the University of Alberta, Grant Notley who would go on to become party Leader and its first elected MLA.

Notley himself did not represent Edmonton but his home region, the oil rich north of Alberta, the Grand Prairie, and Peace River riding.

As it had since 1936 the Social Credit party of Alberta held power in the province as a one party state, under the permanent leadership of Premier Ernest Manning, Preston’s daddy.  The New Democratic Party of Alberta focused its energy not only on consolidating union power in the party as well as the voices of the left and progressives but in challenging that Social Credit domination of Alberta Politics.

This was also the time of the Cold War and the Anti Communist Witch Hunts, a time being anti war, anti nuclear war, pro labour, was considered suspect. Where union members who were left wing were exposed to police spying, where padlock laws in Quebec had been used to raid imprison and steal property belonging to those accused of opposing the Duplesis regime or who were suspect of being Reds.

Duplessis ‘s party in Quebec aligned with that provinces Federal Social Credit Party which was aligned with Alberta’s Party as well. In both provinces the left faced one party dictatorship which reminded many despite their democratic trappings of the forces they had been fighting against in WWII.

As in Alberta it would be the post war labour movement in Quebec under Louis Lebarge that would mobilize politically as well as economically against the Old Regime, his right hand was a young activist lawyer named Pierre Eliot Trudeau. And like Alberta they were building a provincial and national party; the Liberals.

This then is the historical basis for the differences between the left in Quebec and the rest of Canada and why it took so long to breech these two solitudes, as was done in 2012 under Jack Layton and the federal NDP.

Premier Rachel Notley, the daughter of Grant Notley, the first NDP MLA ever elected to the Legislature, the first opposition member elected against the Social Credit party of Ernest Manning  had this rich history as her prologue at this week’s national NDP Convention in Edmonton where the party adopted the LEAP manifesto which challenges the very energy economy that makes Alberta a modern industrial state.

This province created the NDP under the leadership of  Neil Reimer, an oil worker and oil union organizer.  Neil was the first leader of the Party, and Reg Baskin was his right hand in their union and the party.

Neil also created the modern Canadian Energy Workers union,  Neil and Reg first represented oil workers in the new industry in the province with the OCAW  oil chemical and atomic workers of Canada, which had one other base of expansion; Louisiana.  He and Reg made it the Canadian Energy Workers Union, which became CEP merging with the Canadian Paper workers unions in BC, and now has consolidated with CAW to create UNIFOR.

Neil’s daughter was Jan Reimer two term Mayor of Edmonton during the 1990’s and while party labels are not used in Edmonton municipal elections everyone knew that we had an NDP mayor.

Meatpackers, a union that disappeared in the eighties with amalgamation of the meat packing industry into a smaller and smaller oligopoly, was a militant base of union workers and activists including communists and socialists, that was a large base for the party, as was Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 488.

These were the post war unions that were the party’s base in Edmonton and across the province. Federally the postal workers were a strong backbone for the Federal Party, though there were two separate unions at that time, letter carriers and inside workers, the latter being more left wing and militant with OBU IWW communist, socialist and Trotskyist activist workers.

It was the discovery of tar sands oil that led to the growth of the province, the union and the NDP. It was also this discovery and its needed development during the Arab Oil Crisis of 1971 that led to the end of the Social Credit government, its movement, but not its essence. In its place came the newest members of the Alberta Legislature elected in 1967 for the first time, the Lougheed Progressive Conservatives. They would be joined by Grant Notley and the NDP in opposition in 1968, when Grant won a by-election in Spirit River.

The “Progressive” element in the Lougheed PC’s represented the post war Liberal base among the non Anglo ethnic communities in Edmonton and Calgary, such as the recent post war immigration of Ukrainians, Italians, Portuguese, Greek, European, Asian, and Displaced Peoples. The Liberals had no political existence in Alberta since they were wiped out by the United Farmers/ Labour Party coalition in 1921.

Even Lougheed’s conservatism was not the neo conservative Austrian school embraced by the republican lite Preston Manning cons of today, it was classical liberal capitalism, that progressive aspect of capitalism that sought to ameliorate through regulation what short comings capitalism itself may suffer from despite its idealism of being the ‘ideal’ system.

The history of the Alberta NDP is the history of the Oil Workers and the Oil Industry in Alberta, even more than it is for the current batch of Conservatives provincial or federal.  The NDP in Alberta grew up with the oil industry with its workers and their union. For the Alberta NDP to reject both the LEAP manifesto and those call for the end of pipelines is natural and should have been expected by those who know the party history in the province.

For those who fail to understand this historic base of the party in Alberta fail to understand the social democratic politics of the oil industry, the NDP has long supported a form of nationalization under public ownership and increased workers control through unionization.

This occurred in the case of Suncor which was the earliest of the oil sands operators, before the Syncrude conglomerate was created.  In the early seventies after the Lougheed government promoted the oil sands, Suncor began mining operations.  Neil Reimer’s new Canadian Energy and Paperworkers union, CEP, got its birth in a long and bitter historic strike at the Suncor operations.

CEP went on to organize refineries in Edmonton, Sherwood Park and Fort Saskatchewan.
It tried but failed to organize Syncrude due to its conglomerate ownership and its concerted anti union efforts over the decade of the seventies into the eighties. Today unionized Suncor has bought out Syncrude so this situation opens it up to unionization decades later.

The seventies and eighties saw massive growth in the province including growth in both private and public union membership.

This also saw the success of the NDP and the left in Edmonton. While Grant Notley was a lone NDP member in Alberta Legislature, Edmonton saw a left wing U of A Prof David Leadbeater elected alderman.  Notley was joined in the house by Ray Martin, from Edmonton.
The NDP elected Ross Harvey its first federal MP from Alberta in the eighties from the old packing plant and union district of Edmonton Beverly. This was at the height of the Arab Oil Crisis of early eighties, which the Conservatives in Calgary blamed on the NDP Liberal National Energy Plan, NEP, which included the creation of the Canadian Publicly Owned Oil and Gas Company PetroCanada.

PetroCanada was a success and saved Calgary and the Lougheed Government during this oil crisis, it was able to buy up, nationalize, American oil companies like Gulf Mobile, Texaco, Chevron,  as well as smaller Canadian and American oil companies that were going broke or bailing out of Calgary heading back to Dallas and Huston.

And CEP was there to unionize it. Today PetroCanada is no more the Liberals privatized during the Austerity crisis of the Nineties, and Paul Martins Liberal Government sold off the last of our shares prior to the 2006 election.

Ironically it is Suncor that bought them and then bought up PetroCan and absorbed it., just as it has done with its competitor Syncrude.

It would be during the late eighties and early nineties that under Ray Martin the NDP would gain a record number of seats, going from 2 to 23 and status of official opposition. But by the time of the middle of nineties and the Austerity panic of debt and deficit hysteria and the birth of the neo conservative movement that two city Mayors, Ralph Klein of Calgary and Lawrence Decore of Edmonton would battle it out for Premier of the Province, Klein for the PC’s and Decore for the Liberals. Both ran on Austerity budgets, one promised massive cuts the other brutal cuts. It was a close election the losers were the NDP who were wiped out as a third party.

In Edmonton we had a new NDP mayor to replace Decore, Neil’s daughter Jan Reimer, joined by another leftist alderman the bus driver Brian Mason. The NDP centred itself in Edmonton at this time and got elected the enormously popular  team of Pam Barrett and Raj Pannu.
The CEP was critical in supporting the NDP at this time, including having its past president Reg Basking become leader of the Party.

After the shocking early death of party leader Pam Barrett, former alderman Brian Mason ran in her riding, Highlands, which also covers the Federal riding of Beverly that Ross Harvey once represented and won her seat in the house. Raj Pannu became the first Indo Canadian leader of an NDP party in Canada.  After he stepped down Brian Mason became the leader of the party.
The party went from four seats to two to four until Brian stepped down and the party elected Grant Notley’s daughter, Rachel Notley, who had sat in the house with Brian through all those ups and downs in electoral success.

The party base is the labour movement and left across the province and no less important unions such as CEP, IBEW, Carpenters and UA488 all involved in the oil sands and the petrochemical industry in Alberta.

So why are the various wags and pundits surprised when the Alberta NDP does not LEAP off the edge of a cliff named STOP PIPELINES, STOP DIRTY OIL.

In the finest of social democratic traditions, the Alberta NDP will do no such thing nor should it be expected to. It will ameliorate the worst of the environmental damages that the fossil fuel industry has and can be expected to cause. They will create a green plan, and expand the carbon fuel tax the PC’s brought in.

 It will do what the conservatives would not do, and that is eliminating Alberta’s Socred PC dirty energy economic backbone: coal. And that is the real dirty energy in Alberta, coal fired utility plants. These plants are evenly divided between private ownership, with state support from the ruling Socreds and PC’s, TransAlta Utilities, and publicly owned municipal utilities EPCOR and ENMAX. TransAlta is the original P3 funded by taxpayers under the Socred and spun off to become a private company where government cabinet members retire to the board of.

Even Lougheed was tied to the coal industry representing his old employer Mannix Inc, as a board member of Luscar Coal, which during the nineties created a major controversy with its efforts to mine outside of Jasper National Park.

Contrary to Greenpeace and other environmentalists who claim oil sands are the dirtiest energy the real dirty energy on the Palliser Plains of Alberta and Saskatchewan is coal.

Coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel that needs to be kept in the ground. There is no such thing as clean coal!

There is however clean petrochemical fuels, that is the nature of refining, creating finer and finer grades of hydrocarbons; ethenes, benzenes, oil and gas for plastic production, diesel etc.
That is the reason for both the Joffre and Scotford massive refining projects and the plan for the heartland refining project, which would allow the province to crack and refine bitumen into secondary and tertiary hydrocarbons.

That is what the future of the energy is in Alberta, stopping the use of coal, refining hydrocarbons and shipping them south, east, and west.

Why would the NDP limit the provinces ability to ship what it processes.

As I have pointed out the pipeline west will probably go through the Peace River Athabasca highway route to Prince Rupert, which coincides with BC Site C dam development and its LNG  pipeline development, giving pipeline companies an alternative to going to Kitimat via the BC Sacred Bear Rainforest.

Energy East will be built and the NDP will promote as it did in the eighties, the idea that Alberta energy for a fair price should go east. What occurred instead was it was shipped to refineris in Ontario and Quebec at discounted prices where it was refined and sold to the US while oil was imported from the Middle East.

This was the original idea of the NEP that the NDP and Liberals promoted to Lougheed, and he agreed to! And like the NDP this was his vision for Alberta oil before he died.
While the LEAP manifesto is suitably left wing green etc, even shudder, anti capitalist ( read anti corporations) it is not something either the labour movement or NDP in Alberta will agree to do much more about than debate. Debate will be welcome, dictat not so much.

LEAP like most environmentalism today fails to take into consideration that even if workers had control of publicly owned energy companies, we would still be producing hydrocarbons, and will be even after the glorious Socialist Revolution.

The dirtiest energy causing climate change is not oil sands in Alberta or Venezuela it is coal and wood burning worldwide.  That is the challenge we face to shut down coal, and wood burning, not to accept the myth of Clean Coal, and to make sure we ameliorate environmental damage caused through hydrocarbon production.

You want to keep something in the ground its coal, and the biggest fight back in Alberta today is the utility lobbies who oppose the Alberta NDP Government ending of coal fired utilities.

In Alberta the NDP is the party of oil and oil workers. Never forget it. The old Social Credit of Preston Manning’s daddy’s day and the PC’s of Lougheed Klein were both parties of coal.


Not Your Usual Left Wing Rant

No Taxes for the working class. That should be the watchword of the Left.

Left blogger a Class Act bemoans the state of the Canadian left on his blog. He says; "
When is the left going to quit trying to be like its opponents,and begin to define itself by it's own actions and ideology?Give the people a real choice,a choice that stands for something,but above all principaled."

Exactomundo. When the Reform party was created it based itself not on the neo-conservatism of the Reaganites but on Western Canadian populism, a populism based on the Left. Recall, referendum, the attack on taxation, were all antebellum left wing causes at the begining of the 20th Century.

Socialism as Class Act calls it. It included the ideology of the producer republic, Georgism in the United States, the Cooperative Commonweal in Canada and the UK. It included syndicalism for the working class, and producer cooperatives for farmers and small producers. It was anti-monopoly and anti-rentier, pro land ownership. See 
Rothbard’s Reds Redux


Socialism at the begining of last century was not yet tainted with Bolshevism. And I use that term deliberately to distinguish it from communism. For within the anarchist and statist socialist movements were movements of communism, which went farther and further in their critique of capitalism than the anti-state socialists did.

Unfortunately the socialist dream, or vision, was lost in the coming forth of the social democratic movement and its statist ideal of the welfare state. Far from dying at the end of WWI in Canada the CCF called for social revolution, as did many of the socialists of the day. They still had only had a small taste of government, in this case the Socialist Party of Canada had been crucial to maintaince of power for the provincial Liberals in B.C, in the last days of fin de sicle 19th century.

The Socialist movement in Canada coalesced around the CCF, the Communist party and the OBU. With the destruction of the later and the success of the former in gaining political power provincially and representation federally came the end of the extra parlimentary left in Canada.

By the 1960's the CCF and the labour movement had purged the radicals and were now liberal social democratics just like their German predecesors of the century before.

The extra-parliamentary left was centred around the anti-Nuclear Bomb movement, Our Generation magazine, and what could be loosely called an anarchist left. One that was sceptical that state power could change anything.

Today the NDP and its social democratic ilk are really liberals in a hurry. And thus the plight that Class Act finds us in. We go back to the orginal debate between State Socialists and Anti-State Socialists. Is socialism a set of principles and and ideal to strive towards or is it the pragmatic logic of gaining state power.
It is of course the former since the latter has been a historic failure.

Since I of course do not believe it is the latter, I hardly consider the NDP or even the Trade Unions on the left. That is they cannot concieve of a program of workers and community control that is a radical challenge to the corporate/financial and state monopoly. They in effect are , as the left communists call them, the left hand of capitalism. They merely wish to ameliorate the worst excesses of capitalism while maintaining the status quo.

Expect no real answers from them on how to change or challenge the system.

But thank goodness the long march to Ottawa by the neo-conservative right in Canada has finally ended in a minority government. Because they too called for a revolution in politics as usual. And they too have ended up being no such thing, just business as usual.

Where the left failed during the past two decades was to see that what Reform had harnassed was a real grass roots disgruntlement of the working class towards politics as usual. Not always reactionary, it was based on feeling powerless and wanting to feel in power over our own lives.

The Left never got it. Whenever the NDP called for taxing the rich, the guys in the Alberta Gas Plants, unionized, and paid overtime saw it as an attack on their wages. It didn't matter that the NDP meant the Rich, as in the 1% of Canadians that own all the wealth, or the corporations, their message was lost on the working class. And for good reason.

We hate taxes. We love services. And we will pay for services, but we hate taxes. And why shouldn't we, over the past fifty years the federal and provincial tax base has moved from the corporations to picking the pockets of you and me.

The NDP finally realised this simple fact during the 2004 election and during the last sitting of the house. They called for more tax breaks for the working class. But because this runs counter to their state socialism, they were faint hearted in their calls, faint hearted in their attack on the Liberals and Conservatives as parties of the rich and entrenched power. The so called special interests.

The fact is that the Conservative government in Ottawa is about to launch a massive assault on the working class through taxation.

They will fund their 1% GST cut by eliminating tax breaks the Liberals brought in. They will give out a baby bonus that will be taxed. They will fail to transfer funds to day care programs clawing them back.


The Left should be calling for no taxation for anyone who earns $100,000 a year or less. Period. That is the mass of the working class in this country.

No party currently will call for this and for the elimination of user fees and the GST. For these are the little taxes that hurt, the death by a thousand cuts that so irritate each and every wage slave in Canada.

Tax the Corporations NOT the People, should be the watchword of the Left. Want Daycare and Medicare, the corporations should pay, out of pre tax profits. It is social capital that they directly benefit from in their bottom line, its what makes them competitive against the American capitalist model.

Eliminate all corporate tax loopholes. Eliminate offshore investment havens for the Rich. And in the process this will eliminate the Tax Department.

The Left should attack the failure of the Reformers, who are still out there as the recent Fireweed Forum on Democracy showed, and the parliamentary reformers,
to address the real issue of political reform in Canada.

The need for real democracy, directly elected revocable delgates to constiuent assemblies. To the right to referndum, to a renewal of Canada as constitutional confederation of the people not a con job. See my
 Abolish The Senate

On economic renewal we should be calling for the creation of peoples banks, the deregulation of banking from the hands of the State into the hands of the people as pools of capital for usage with institutional pension funds and workers investments to build small and medium sized worker/producer cooperatives.
See 
Michael Alberts Economic Participatory Democracy project; Parecon.

This deregulation would also eliminate large banks as holders of capital in the national interest. That role should be continued by the Bank of Canada, which delegated it to the national banks twenty years ago under the Mulroney Conservatives.

We don't need a state in Canada we need a confederation of peoples and communities in a federal system not of Trudeau's making or Harpers but in the Proudhonist model of self government.


And this cannot be done through electoral means, it takes a social revolution. The Reform party tried to do this from the Right and the NPI and other attempts to reform the NDP did it on the left and the result is Jack Layton and Stephen Harper. Nothing changed.

So Class Act I agree with you that the Left needs renewal. And the Left needs first to divorce itself from the existing liberal social democratic parliamentary mileu.
Then and only then will it become an authentic voice for Canadians who are frustrated and pissed off with the system as it is. We have been told to embrace change for twenty years by the neo-cons as they privatized public services. That change for change sake ideology is deeply embedded in all of capitalism corporate and managerial structures now. It gives us a window to challenge the very system of capitalism with a real Left agenda of People Power.


Also see:

Unite the Left
A Peoples Program for Alberta

Left, Right and Liberty

State-less Socialism

Social Credit And Western Canadian Radicalism

Rebel Yell

Plutocrats Rule

WRITTEN IN 2006

 
LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for OBU ALBERTA