Wednesday, October 15, 2025

 

Creative Destruction Lab Berlin launches new stream in defense technologies



ESMT Berlin
CDL-Defence Stream 

image: 

The DEEP – Institute of Deep Tech Innovation at ESMT Berlin is expanding the German offering of Creative Destruction Lab (CDL) with a new Defence Stream.

view more 

Credit: ESMT Berlin, Photo: Jeremy Knowles




The DEEP – Institute of Deep Tech Innovation at ESMT Berlin is expanding the German offering of Creative Destruction Lab (CDL) with a new Defence Stream. Each year, the stream will support up to 25 science-based startups developing and commercializing dual-use technologies.

CDL-Berlin is part of the international, nonprofit CDL network. It supports early-stage, science- and technology-based startups through a structured nine-month mentoring program led by experienced entrepreneurs, investors, and scientists and helps founders to develop and scale their technologies. The new stream addresses a critical gap between technological innovation and practical application in the defense sector. Participating startups gain access to an international network of experts from academia, industry, investment, and operational practice. 

The introduction of the Defence Stream comes at a time of increasing geopolitical tensions and shifting security priorities, as NATO partner countries seek more agile innovation models. “By bringing CDL Defence to Germany, right ahead of the Munich Security Conference, we connect ventures not only with Europe’s world-class industry and startup ecosystem, but also with the very heart of global security dialogue. This unique position allows startups to build deep-tech solutions with trusted partners, scale within Europe’s innovation ecosystem, and engage directly with decision-makers shaping the future of defence and security,” says Thorsten Lambertus, Managing Director of the DEEP – Institute of Deep Tech Innovation at ESMT Berlin and Site Lead of CDL-Berlin. 

CDL Defence is a global initiative involving eight other CDL sites in addition to Berlin: Toronto, Vancouver, Rockies, Atlantic, Montreal, Estonia, London, and Milan. The first cohort will begin with a virtual bootcamp at the end of October 2025, followed by mentoring sessions in Halifax, Munich, and Toronto. 


 

Internal migrants in the U.S. age with fewer disabilities, study finds



Study of 5.4 million older Americans shows that those who move states are healthier than peers who stay put—with immigrants showing the strongest health advantage once education levels were taken into account



University of Toronto





TORONTO, Canada—A groundbreaking study analyzing data from over 5 million older Americans has found that those who migrate within the U.S. have significantly better health outcomes than those who remain in their birth state, offering compelling evidence of a “healthy migrant effect” within U.S. borders.

Published in the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, the study examined the prevalence of five types of disability among Americans aged 65 and older: serious vision and hearing problems, cognitive impairment, limitations in daily activities (ADLs), and physical limitations such as difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

The researchers found that older adults who had relocated to a different U.S. state were significantly less likely to report all five disabilities compared to those who still lived in their natal state, even after accounting for age, sex, and race.

“This study provides the first large-scale evidence that internal migration in the U.S. is linked to better health in later life,” said coauthor Katherine Ahlin, a graduate of the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (FIFSW) at the University of Toronto. “We found that older adults who stayed in their birth state had up to 22% higher odds of disability than internal migrants.”

Importantly, controlling for education levels substantially reduced—but did not eliminate—this health advantage. The researchers suggest that individuals may move away from the state they were born in for post-secondary educational opportunities and those with more education may find better employment opportunities if they are geographically mobile.

“Educational attainment appears to play a dual role—both increasing the likelihood of migration and offering protection against disability,” noted co-author Alyssa McAlpine, an FIFSW graduate. “However, internal migrants remained healthier even when we adjusted for education, which suggests that other factors like self-selection are also at play.”

Perhaps most strikingly, individuals from abroad who migrated to the U.S. had lower odds of disability compared to internal migrants when their level of education was taken into account. After adjusting for education, age, sex, and race, international immigrants had between 7% and 33% lower odds of four types of disabilities than internal migrants: hearing problems, severe vision problems, cognitive impairments and mobility problems.

“This stronger health advantage among immigrants points to a more intense selection process where unhealthy individuals are less likely to overcome the multiple challenges of international migration,” said Professor Esme Fuller-Thomson, senior author and Director of the Institute for Life Course and Aging at the University of Toronto. “Barriers such as cost, distance, and immigration policies likely reinforce this selection effect.”

The authors suggest that the findings may be partially explained by both self-selection (healthier individuals choosing to migrate) and reverse migration (less healthy individuals returning to their place of origin). While these effects have been studied in international contexts, the study expands the discussion to include internal migration within high-income countries like the U.S.

Despite limitations, including lack of data on timing or reasons for migration, the study makes a significant contribution to public health research. It urges policymakers and researchers to consider migration history in studies of aging and health, as mobility may signal both opportunity and resilience.

 

Processing level of plant-based foods: Impact on cardiovascular health




INRAE - National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment





Previous studies have reported that a high consumption of ultra-processed foods[1] is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, while other studies[2] have shown that a diet including a large proportion of plant-based products—when nutritionally balanced—may reduce the risk of developing these diseases.

In order to study the links between nutrition and cardiovascular health, a research team from INRAE, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, and Cnam went beyond the usual distinction between plant-based and animal-based foods, considering also the nutritional quality—for example, carbohydrate, fat, or antioxidant vitamin and mineral content—as well as the degree of food processing.

The research team analysed health data from 63,835 adults participating in the French NutriNet-Santé cohort. The average follow-up period was 9.1 years, and for those enrolled earliest, it extended up to 15 years. Dietary intake—that is, the foods and beverages consumed over at least three days—was collected using online questionnaires. This detailed data collection made it possible to distinguish between three types of diets, by comparing the proportion of plant-based to animal-based products, and by considering not only their nutritional quality but also their level of industrial processing.

Nutritional quality and degree of processing

The researchers found that adults whose diets were richer in plant-based products of higher nutritional quality (lower in fat, sugar, and salt) with little or no industrial processing had approximately a 40% lower risk of cardiovascular disease compared to those whose diets were lower in such plant-based products and higher in animal-based ones[3].

Adults whose diets were richer in plant-based products of higher nutritional quality but that were ultra-processed—such as industrial wholemeal breads, store-bought soups, ready-made pasta dishes, or commercially prepared salads with dressing—did not have a lower risk of cardiovascular risk compared to those whose diets were lower in such products and higher in animal-based foods.

The risk of cardiovascular disease was approximately 40% higher among adults who consumed a large proportion of plant-based products that were both of lower nutritional quality and ultra-processed—such as crisps, fruit-based sweetened drinks or sodas made from plant extracts, chocolate-based sweets or confectionery, sugary breakfast cereals and savoury biscuits—compared to those whose diets were richer in plant-based products of good nutritional quality with little or no industrial processing.

These results highlight the need to consider both the nutritional quality and the degree of processing and formulation of foods—alongside the plant-to-animal balance in the diet—in order to better assess the links between nutrition and cardiovascular health. They provide new arguments in support of public health and nutrition policies that promote plant-based foods which are both of good nutritional quality with little or no industrial processing (such as fresh, frozen, or high-quality canned fruits and vegetables, for example, without added fats, salt, sugar or additives).


[1] According to the NOVA classification, these are foods that have undergone significant biological, chemical, or physical processing (such as extrusion, pre-frying, hydrolysis, or ultra-high-temperature heating), and/or whose formulation includes certain food additives not necessary for the product’s food safety (such as colourings, emulsifiers, or sweeteners), or industrial substances such as hydrogenated oils, glucose/fructose syrup, hydrolysed proteins and inverted sugar.

[2] Rauber F., da Costa Louzada M.L., Chang C. et al. (2024). Implications of food ultra-processing on cardiovascular risk considering plant origin foods: an analysis of the UK biobank cohort. The Lancet Regional Health-Europe, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100948 
Daas M.C., Vellinga R.E., Pinho M.G.M. et al. (2024). The role of ultra-processed foods in plant-based diets: associations with human health and environmental sustainability. European Journal of Nutrition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03477-w

[3] That is, with a consumption of about 280 g per day of fruits and vegetables — half the recommendation of the French National Health and Nutrition Plan (PNNS) — 54.1 g per day of red meat (about 380 g per week),

The NutriNet-Santé study is a public health initiative coordinated by the Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (CRESS-EREN, Inserm/INRAE/Cnam/Université Sorbonne Paris Nord/Université Paris Cité). Thanks to the commitment and long-term participation of over 180,000 “nutrinauts”, the study is helping advance research into the links between nutrition (diet, physical activity, nutritional status) and health. Launched in 2009, it has already led to over 300 international scientific publications. Recruitment of new participants is ongoing, to continue supporting public research into the relationship between nutrition and health.

By spending just a few minutes each month on the secure platform etude-nutrinet-sante.fr to complete questionnaires on diet, physical activity, and health, participants are helping build knowledge toward healthier and more sustainable eating habits.

 

New end of life care study reveals gaps in palliative care access



Swansea University




A new study from Swansea University, UK, using population-scale data, has revealed insights into how people use health and care services in their final year of life and highlights the need for better identification and support for people needing palliative care.

The research, published in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe journal, found that most people spent their last year of life at home, but demand for urgent care increased sharply near death.

People who were registered for palliative care used more health and care services from home but those in care homes - both with and without nursing - used these services less. It was also found that people who were registered for palliative care were discharged from urgent hospital settings at a faster rate and so experienced shorter emergency hospital stays than those who were not registered for palliative care.

It also uncovered disparities in access to palliative care, with men, urban residents, people living alone, and those in deprived communities being under-represented on the palliative care register.

The research team says that their study reveals an urgent need to identify people who would benefit from palliative care earlier and to provide additional support in home settings, especially to underserved groups. At a time when health and social care systems face mounting pressure, the research indicates that system-level planning and data-driven strategies are also required to manage the rising demand for end-of-life services.

Research lead Professor Rhiannon Owen from Swansea University’s Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science said:

“This work enabling a system-wide evaluation for the entire of population of Wales was only made possible by linkage of anonymous health and administrative data facilitated by the SAIL Databank. Our findings provide a vital evidence-based foundation to support ministerial policy for designing more efficient, compassionate, and equitable end-of-life care in Wales.”

The research work was conducted in response to the National Programme for Palliative and End of Life Care in Wales and commissioned by the Welsh Government via the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre.

Read the research in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe journal.