Thursday, March 26, 2026

 

Children and teenagers more open to meat free diets - but struggle to maintain it




University of Exeter





Lots of children and teenagers are open to a vegetarian or vegan diet and cut out meat but then struggle to keep it up, according to a new study from the University of Exeter.

The study, published in Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations, found childhood and adolescence are key windows for reducing meat consumption as children and teenagers are far more open to giving up meat than adults. This offers a promising opportunity for supporting healthier and more sustainable diets in future generations, but there are still several practical barriers standing in the way.

Lead researcher Dr Luke McGuire from the University of Exeter said: “There’s a growing shift towards plant-based eating, but many adults still struggle to change their behaviour and view eating meat as natural, normal, and necessary. This makes dietary change among adults challenging, but research shows children place a similar moral value on animal lives as on human lives and are less likely than adults to view eating meat as morally acceptable.

“We therefore wanted to understand whether these beliefs are related to behaviours and what makes young people consider vegetarian or vegan diets and found many are motivated by moral, environmental, and emotional factors.

“Research has shown vegetarian or vegan diets are safe for children and can be beneficial to their health, if done correctly. It means with the right support from parents and schools - and improvements in the convenience and appeal of plant-based foods - childhood could represent a powerful opportunity to encourage healthier and more sustainable eating habits.”

Researchers surveyed more than 1,000 UK young adults aged 18 to 26 years old, asking whether they had ever thought about giving up meat while growing up. Around half (48.5 per cent) of all participants said they had considered stopping eating meat before finishing secondary school, with these thoughts first occurring aged 11 on average. Of those who considered it, about half (50.4 per cent) actually tried to stop eating meat, ranging from a few days to several years.

However, the study found that most young people eventually returned to eating meat, with practical barriers such as taste, convenience, social pressure, and fitting in with family routines among the common reasons. Researchers also found parental support was the strongest factor in whether young people successfully maintained a meat-free diet – but parents were often more supportive of their child returning to eating meat than of their initial attempt to give it up.

The study found two key reasons why young people reduced meat consumption. The first was disgust at learning that meat came from animals, an insight which often prompted an interest among young children in avoiding meat. Meanwhile, older children and teenagers were more likely to be motivated by health or environmental concerns, reflecting rising awareness of global sustainability issues among younger generations. Participants also described “meat epiphany moments,” when learning about food systems prompted them to re-evaluate what they ate.

Co-author Professor Natalia Lawrence from the University of Exeter said: “Our findings suggest childhood and adolescence are natural periods for encouraging plant-based eating. However, for children and young people to successfully stop eating meat they need parental engagement and support.

“Part of the issue is offering more accessible and appealing plant-based options for families. Stronger food education in schools, alongside wider public messaging – like the recent ‘Bang In Some Beans’ campaign - highlight how an individual’s dietary choices contribute to health, environmental, and animal welfare goals.”

The paper titled ‘Early attempts to stop eating meat: Prevalence, predictors and outcomes among UK youth’ is published in Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations.

The study was funded in part by a grant from Children & Young People's Wellbeing @ Exeter. More info on Bang In Some Beans: https://foodfoundation.org.uk/initiatives/bang-in-some-beans

 

Video training helps young adults with disabilities navigate romance




Florida Atlantic University
FAU College of Education 

image: 

FAU researchers tested a video modeling intervention designed to teach young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to recognize appropriate and inappropriate romantic behaviors across in-person and online settings.

view more 

Credit: Florida Atlantic University




For too long, individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have been denied the same opportunities for love, romance and sexual expression as their peers. Misconceptions about their desires and abilities have limited their privacy, autonomy and access to essential education, leaving many without the tools or opportunities to explore romantic relationships safely and confidently.

Despite a clear desire for connection, individuals with IDD face societal, familial and institutional barriers that restrict dating experiences and understanding of romance, from limited social networks to exclusion from sexuality education. Experts now emphasize that providing inclusive, explicit and replicable education on relationships and sexuality is not only a matter of safety, but also a matter of dignity, equality and the fundamental right to love.

Researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s College of Education addressed this critical gap by exploring the use of video modeling interventions to enhance romantic relationship skills and provide sexuality education for young adults with IDD. The study focused on whether video modeling can help participants recognize appropriate versus inappropriate romantic behaviors across multiple contexts – including in-person verbal, in-person physical, online verbal and online physical interactions – and whether these skills are maintained after the intervention ends.

To implement the intervention, the researchers developed a training program featuring 80 videos depicting both appropriate and inappropriate romantic scenarios. Each participant viewed selected videos and practiced responding to the situations using a 10-step task analysis. Researchers measured how effectively the video modeling program helped adults with IDD make safe and informed decisions when interacting with potential partners.

Results of the study, published in the journal Sexuality and Disabilityfound that the video modeling intervention significantly improved participants’ decision-making skills across all four relationship domains: in-person verbal, in-person physical, online verbal, and online physical interactions. Before the intervention, participants completed an average of just 20% of the steps correctly, but accuracy jumped to 76% once the video training began. While mastery levels dipped slightly two weeks after the intervention ended, participants still performed far above baseline, averaging 83% accuracy.

Overall, the findings show that the video program effectively helped adults with IDD recognize and respond appropriately to both safe and unsafe romantic scenarios.

The study also highlights the need for targeted instruction in the in-person physical domain, where errors were more common, and demonstrated that remote, video-based training allows participants to engage with sensitive content in a private and supportive environment.

Social validity results emphasized the importance of participant and family involvement, showing that the program fostered meaningful discussions, empowered decision-making, and improved communication about relationships and intimacy. The study confirms that individuals with IDD can acquire critical skills for navigating romantic relationships safely, challenging societal misconceptions that they do not desire or deserve meaningful romantic and sexual experiences.

“Romantic and sexual education is not a luxury – it is a fundamental aspect of dignity and independence for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This study shows that with the right tools, these individuals can learn to navigate complex relationship situations safely and confidently,” said Brianna Miller, Ph.D., senior author and a faculty member in FAU’s Department of Special Education and the Academy for Community Inclusion. “Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating evidence-based, accessible education into both school and postsecondary programs, equipping individuals to make informed decisions, recognize boundaries, and engage fully in meaningful romantic relationships.”

Moving forward, the researchers suggest that this approach can serve as a model for inclusive sexual education, ensuring that all individuals have the knowledge and skills to embrace healthy relationships on their own terms.

Study co-authors are Lauren Berlingo, Ph.D., an assistant professor, Troy University; Kaley Adams, Ph.D., a visiting instructor; Kelly Kearney, Ed.D., an assistant professor; Elisa Cruz, Ed.D., an instructor; and Lisa Finnegan, Ph.D., an associate professor, all with FAU’s Department of Special Education.  

 

Beyond the obstetrical dilemma: Why are humans helpless at birth?



Turns out helplessness is key to humankind’s survival rather than a weakness



University of Ottawa

Beyond the obstetrical dilemma: Why are humans helpless at birth? 

image: 

“Infants are unique in having their eyes and ears open, and in developing in a longer period of care. It could be that this period of helplessness is important to making us who we are as a species," says Stuart Hammond, Associate Professor of Psychology in the Faculty of Social Sciences at uOttawa.

view more 

Credit: University of Ottawa





Infants’ helplessness demonstrates unique social implications for human development. In a new paper developmental psychology researchers from the University of Ottawa explored human infants' helplessness as a key to human nature, delving into questions of why humans evolved unlike other mammals with strong sensory systems and weak motor systems for an extended period. And they looked at what this means for human development and the survival of our species.

Lead author Stuart Hammond, an Associate Professor of Psychology in the Faculty of Social Sciences, discusses this latest research published in Child Development Perspectives

QUESTION: Has developmental science overlooked human helplessness?

STUART HAMMOND: There is a recent narrative framing humanity, and especially masculinity, about strength and independence. In this view especially, dependence is weakness. Unlike “super precocial” species, humans have evolved and develop to depend on each other. 

Human infant helplessness is striking because a species becoming more helpless seems to run against survival. For anthropologists, there is an interest in understanding when in human evolutionary history aspects of helplessness began to appear, and its role in explaining why humans are such an adaptable species, capable of social collaboration and cultural innovation. 

Q: Why has helplessness been overlooked with babies, specifically?

SH: We see several reasons from the term helplessness having negative connotations to being a byproduct of the “obstetrical dilemma,” where humans must give birth at a time when the infant’s head is small enough to exit the birth canal. The two main competing theories in developmental psychology are nativism (infants are born with ideas) and empiricism (infants are born a blank slate) are unable to make much of helplessness. There is a third approach, constructivism, focused on infants as agents, in which helplessness could be more interesting. 

Q: How unique is human helplessness within the animal world?

SH: Animal newborns are classified on a spectrum of more altricial (weak sensory and motor systems like a rat) and more precocial (strong sensory and motor systems like a horse). Humans, meanwhile, have altricial motor traits and precocial sensory traits. This combination of traits makes human helplessness unique. 

Q: What are the implications of this uniqueness?

SH: Humans are born with well-developed sensory systems but slowly develop fine and gross motor skills. Babies need to rely heavily on their primary caregivers and communities for basic survival needs, resulting in complex caregiver-infant social interactions for an extended period. But babies are exercising keen attention to the world around them and are in both small and large ways contributing to those communities. 

Q: How should researchers rethink infant helplessness and its impact on human development?

SH: In psychology, there is a long tradition of looking for development in a very direct way. The helplessness perspective is different because the focus is on the possibilities that constrain the ways that the human infant, and its caregivers, must interact to survive, and how some aspects of psychological development will flow from these possibilities. Morality may reliably emerge in humans because of infants and parents are bound in relationships of care, even though helplessness is not itself a form of morality. 

Q: What type of impact will this research have?

SH: We hope the public will look at human infants’ helplessness differently. Babies may not be able to move around in the world, but infants are unique in having their eyes and ears open, and in developing in a longer period of care. It could be that this period of helplessness is important to making us who we are as a species. 

   

Decade of war linked to widespread PTSD and suicidal behavior in Ukrainian children




University of Turku




For more than a decade, Ukrainian children have grown up with war as a constant backdrop. According to researchers, the psychological consequences are now becoming clear. A comprehensive scoping review of 37 studies finds that Ukrainian children and adolescents exposed to a decade of war face high levels of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), internalising and externalising symptoms, suicidality, and self-harm.

An international research team led by the Research Centre for Child Psychiatry at the University of Turku, Finland, reviewed the available evidence on the mental health of Ukrainian children and adolescents. Their scoping review combined findings from 37 studies published between 2020 and 2024, covering research conducted from the early years of the conflict through the ongoing full-scale invasion.

Across studies, children and young people aged 0–19 were found to experience a broad range of mental health problems, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, conduct problems, suicidality, and self-harm. Although prevalence rates varied, the overall conclusion was consistent: prolonged exposure to war is taking a serious psychological toll on Ukraine’s youth.

“Most studies were cross-sectional and focused on children living in Ukraine, with fewer examining refugees or clinical populations. Differences in study design, assessment tools, and timing made direct comparisons difficult, but many relied on young people’s own reports, offering rare insight into their lived experiences”, says the study’s lead author, Postdoctoral Researcher Sanju Silwal from the University of Turku.

Silwal notes that several patterns emerged repeatedly.

“Girls were more likely than boys to report suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and self-harm, while boys showed higher levels of conduct disorders. Children living in regions most affected by fighting faced higher risks of moderate to severe mental health symptoms, including suicidality and self-harm. These risks were evident both during the early phase of the war and after the full-scale invasion, pointing to the cumulative impact of ongoing exposure.”

Displacement and family relationships shape children’s outcomes

Beyond general exposure to conflict, certain experiences sharply increased the risk of mental health problems. Children who had been forcibly displaced, exposed to violence, separated from parents, or who had lost loved ones were particularly vulnerable. Between one-quarter and one-half of young people reported direct or indirect exposure to war-related events. Around one-fifth had experienced displacement, either within Ukraine or abroad.

“Where children ended up mattered”, notes Silwal. “Forced relocation to another country was linked to higher risks of mental health problems, while internal displacement was associated with greater resilience, possibly because children remained within familiar cultural and social environments”.

Family dynamics also played a decisive role.

“Negative parenting practices or low parental involvement were linked to conduct problems and bullying, while supportive family environments appeared to offer some protection. Yet many children reported separation from parents or family members, disrupting vital sources of emotional security during a period of intense stress”, says Professor Andre Sourander from the University of Turku.

“We conducted a time-trend study during the early phase of war and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which revealed that adolescents exposed to both phases of war experience higher levels of psychological distress. More than 10 percent attempted suicide compared to 4 percent of non-exposed peers. This starkly illustrates the devastating, cumulative impact of prolonged war on young minds”, continues Sourander.

Many of the studies in the review were rated low to medium in quality, underscoring how difficult it is to conduct rigorous, long-term research in active war settings. Still, the inclusion of studies published in both English and Ukrainian provided important cultural and contextual insight.

“At a time when children worldwide are increasingly affected by armed conflict, understanding these experiences is urgently needed,” stresses Sourander.

Taken together, the findings portray a generation growing up under extraordinary strain and highlight an urgent need for sustained mental health support and stronger evidence to guide future interventions.

Kids who lose a parent to homicide, suicide or drug overdose are more likely to die as children



University of Michigan






Childhood deaths are significantly higher among children who lose a parent to drug overdose, homicide or suicide compared to the general child population, a new University of Michigan study found.

The research, published in JAMA Network Open, investigated the link between specific types of parental loss and the subsequent risk of mortality for children in Michigan, said study lead author Sean Esteban McCabe, professor at the U-M School of Nursing. 

The study found that bereaved children who experienced a parental death from one of the three preventable causes accounted for 150 excess childhood deaths in the state over the 14-year study period.  

"There are early preventive interventions and childhood bereavement services that have been shown to improve children's health following the death of a parent that need to be made more widely available so no Michigan child grieves alone," McCabe said. "Protecting vulnerable children with proven ways of helping must be a priority for all of us to save more lives because there is no greater failure as a community or state than failing to protect our children." 

U.S. parental mortality has reached historic highs in recent years, increasingly associated with these three leading preventable causes of death. Previous research has shown that Michigan has higher parental mortality rates than the national average, said McCabe, who's also the director of the U-M Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health. 

The U-M team wanted a more complete picture of how these kinds of parental deaths impacted childhood mortality, to help evaluate the need for preventive interventions for bereaved children. It's believed to be the first study of its kind.

Key findings: 

  • Children bereaved by parental drug overdose face a mortality rate by age 17 or younger that was 700% higher than the average Michigan child. The mortality rates were even higher for children bereaved by parental suicide (1,200% higher) or homicide (2,000% higher).

  • The study found that the loss of a biological parent reduces a child's "level of protection against harm," increasing risk of early death. The metrics from the study can be used to evaluate bereavement services.

  • Children bereaved by a homicide death had the highest rate of childhood mortality (about 106 deaths per 10,000), followed by suicide (more than 66 per 10,000) and drug overdose (nearly 37 per 10,000). That's compared to the roughly 5 deaths per 10,000 for children in Michigan overall. 

Researchers partnered with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to link birth and death records from parents and children from 1992-2023, to identify 32,262 children aged 17 or younger who had lost a biological parent to homicide, suicide or overdose. By comparing this group's mortality rate to the state average of 5.22 deaths per 10,000 children, the study calculated excess deaths attributed to those causes, to measure how these specific parental losses increased a child's own risk of mortality.

McCabe said that while the study provided critical insights, it's limited by a focus solely on biological parents and an underreporting of paternal deaths, which means the actual impact is likely much higher.

Next steps for statewide prevention strategies include creating a statewide bereavement collaborative and evaluating bereavement services, McCabe said. 

"There is an urgent need to develop performance metrics and eliminate bereavement service deserts, mental health deserts, and addiction medicine and psychiatry treatment shortages in our state," he said. "A child's zip code should not dictate whether they receive evidence-based bereavement services and treatment."

McCabe has a deep personal and a professional interest in this research.

"I have had several close friends and loved ones die due to overdose, suicide and homicide leaving behind many children," he said. "I work as a volunteer children's bereavement group facilitator at a nonprofit in Southeast Michigan and I've worked with many children who've experienced parental death from overdose, suicide and homicide. 

"Bereaved children often experience friends at school who have no clue what to say when they talk about their parent who died from a drug overdose, homicide or suicide."  

McCabe said friends often change the subject, so grieving children don't want to discuss their deceased parent, and this isolation and lack of understanding speaks to the need for more awareness, education and support. 

McCabe also co-leads the Michigan-based research collaborative HopeHQ, which offers technical assistance to help children bereaved by their parent or significant person's overdose death.  

Co-authors include: Luisa Kcomt, Wayne State University; Rececca Evans-Polce, U-M School of Nursing; Glenn Radford, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services; Samuel Tennant, U-M School of Public Health; Eric Hulsey, Institute for Research, Education and Training in Addictions; and Vita McCabe, Michigan Medicine.

Study: Childhood mortality by parental cause of death (free full text of research letter available when embargo lifts)