Sunday, April 12, 2026

U.S. bourbon demand is down and tariffs aren’t helping. But distillers keep building




Published: 

Charlie Downs, the artisanal craft distiller at a new Heaven Hill Distilleries, Louisville, Ky., checks gauges on a still that will produce small batches of whiskey. (AP Photo/Bruce Schreiner, File)

BARDSTOWN, KY — Like many whiskey distillers, Heaven Hill Brands is rolling back bourbon production this year, as demand lags. Yet, as the American spirit faced a tumultuous market in 2025, the Kentucky company built a new, US$200 million distillery in the heart of bourbon country, adding 155,000 barrels of capacity.

Famous for brands like Evan Williams and Elijah Craig, Heaven Hill exemplifies an industry in whiplash, one struggling and growing all at once. Local cooperages drown in backlogs of unused barrels, distillers are slashing output, and some are laying off workers. Yet tourists still pack plant tours, and whiskey makers have planned at least $1.45 billion in expansion projects between now and 2030, according to research led by Michael Clark, a University of Kentucky economist.

Liquor consumption has been falling from steep pandemic-era highs, as the cost of living soars and some younger consumers drink less. Tariffs and inflation have pushed up input costs and punctured bubbling demand overseas. And now, fallout from the Iran war threatens to increase energy costs.

But the effects of the downturn are not uniform, and the roots of bourbon’s troubles are hotly debated in this Republican stronghold, Reuters found through more than 20 interviews with distillers, suppliers, business owners, voters and politicians last month.

Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear believes tariffs are a key headwind. In an exclusive interview, the Democrat and potential 2028 presidential candidate said tariffs not only make supplies more expensive but complicate bourbon makers’ efforts to reach critical new markets overseas.

Distillers downplay politics, blaming instead cyclical factors like inflation and the difficulty of predicting demand years in advance, as their whiskeys age. “The number of times we’ve gotten (demand) right over 90 years, I jokingly say, is zero,” says Heaven Hill Executive Chairman Max Shapira, adding that current tariffs “really aren’t very impactful.”

A Heaven Hill spokeswoman said bourbon output would be lower this year than last as the company “paces production” after a decade of booming growth, but declined to provide an exact figure.

As midterm elections loom in November, the battle to control the narrative about the bourbon industry’s struggle speaks to how complex America’s economic realities are - and illustrates the lasting strength of U.S. President Donald Trump’s grip on America’s rural South.

A year ago, Trump’s now-defunct “liberation day” tariffs were set. During 2025, Kentucky whiskey exports fell 15 per cent, according to U.S. Census data. That compounded a previous 26 per cent drop dating to the president’s tariffs in 2018, from which overseas demand never fully recovered, according to the Clark-led research, commissioned by the Kentucky Distillers’ Association (KDA).

Greg Hughes, CEO of Jim Beam owner Suntory Global Spirits, says it’s temporary. Inflation and falling demand in developed countries, rather than tariffs, are the main drivers of headwinds that prompted Jim Beam to cut bourbon output this year, Hughes said in an interview. “The industry will get through this,” and “be absolutely fine,” he said, citing expected growth in newer markets like Latin America.

Local businesses shrug off tariffs

LOCAL BUSINESSES SHRUG OFF TARIFFS

Behind the scenes, though, whiskey makers are scared, Beshear insisted. Cultivating the new markets Hughes alluded to will be difficult against a backdrop of tariff uncertainty, the governor said, adding that industry leaders complain to him in private about “how these tariffs have hit them hard, how they shouldn’t have to be going through it a second time.”

Even so, in Kentucky, which Trump visited last month to tout his economic policies, Republicans hold super-majorities in both state legislative houses. That’s unlikely to change in November’s elections, as about half the Republican-held districts in both houses do not have Democratic challengers, according to state election filings.

Trump won the state by at least 25 percentage points in each of the last three presidential elections.

In Bardstown - a timeworn enclave of colonial brick, where public trash cans are fashioned from whiskey barrels - bourbon supports the local economy. “If we don’t have the bourbon industry, we don’t have a business,” says Jeane Noland, owner of the Cozy Cottage gift shop.

But local entrepreneurs largely say business is good, and do not blame Trump for broader struggles.

Susanna Buscemi, part owner of Bardstown’s Volstead Bourbon Lounge, tries hard to keep politics out of her bar. “In here, we’re about having a good time and drinking,” she says.

Though she admits tariffs have increased the costs of certain whiskeys, she says they’re “a good thing for consumers.”

Rum to the rescue?

Though Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February, Trump has vowed to replace them, and has imposed a new worldwide tariff in the meantime. Democratic governors - including Beshear - have sued, calling the new tariffs illegal.

As uncertainty swells, other policy challenges are cropping up. Trump’s attacks on Iran have sent energy prices soaring, stirring concern that inputs like fertilizer for corn, bourbon’s primary ingredient, could grow expensive or scarce.

“We worry about getting ready to plant this year’s corn crop, and are the farmers going to have enough fertilizer? … And if so, at what price?” said Heaven Hill’s Shapira.

Rising costs of living have limited disposable income, while aging baby boomers are being replaced with Gen-Z consumers who, either health-conscious or cash-strapped, aren’t drinking as much. The emergence of weight loss drugs and cannabis drinks is also having an impact.

Kentucky makes about 95 per cent of the world’s bourbon. “And the rest is counterfeit,” quipped Beshear. The bourbon industry supports 24,000 jobs in Kentucky – nearly a third of which are direct distillery roles, the rest split between suppliers and service providers, according to Clark’s research.

Distillery jobs had fallen 1.7 per cent year-over-year as of last September, the most recent data available, according to Clark. Nearly a third of distillers surveyed by Clark reported cutting jobs - though many also reported adding headcount.

Barrel inventories are at a record high, Clark found, with 16.1 million aging in Kentucky - a 57 per cent increase from 2020.

Distillers say that’s not a problem - whiskey gains value as it ages, so they need not rush out old stock. Still, they’ve had to adjust. Brown-Forman owner of brands like Woodford Reserve, cut 12 per cent of its workforce in 2025, and announced talks in March to merge with French spirits giant Pernod Ricard.

Lofted Spirits, among the largest distillers of American whiskey, laid off workers last year, though it declined to say how many. The company makes most of its money as a contractor, distilling for other brands, so dwindling orders forced it to reduce bourbon output by “at least half,” CEO Mark Erwin said.

Finding himself with empty fermenters, Erwin decided to pivot to a quintessentially Caribbean spirit: rum, a liquor that need not age as long and can reach the market more quickly. Erwin expects rum to account for nearly half the company’s output this year. “I don’t mind making it,” he says. “It’s good business.”

Tariff ripples

David Meier, owner of tiny Glenns Creek Distilling in Frankfort, says his bottle costs have risen about 25 cents a bottle due to tariffs - about a 15 per cent bump - but so far, he hasn’t passed the cost on to consumers.

Heaven Hill says just 10 per cent of its revenues come from exports. Hughes, likewise, said most of Suntory’s American whiskey is sold domestically, and that even Canada – which drew headlines when provinces pulled American whiskey from shelves early last year - represents less than one per cent of its bourbon sales.

Such distillers say reports of bourbon’s death are greatly exaggerated. Still, some suppliers struggle.

Canton Wood Products, a Lebanon, KY-based barrel maker, sold about 7,000 barrels last year, down around 50 per cent from 2022, said Vice President of Operations Melody Pruitt. Tariffs compounded the hit by increasing the cost of oak imported from France and Japan, forcing layoffs of eight of the company’s 38 employees - a move Pruitt says gutted her. “Their livelihood depends on coming to work every day, just like mine,” she said.

Independent Stave Company, the industry’s biggest barrel supplier whose customers include top producers like Brown-Forman, has fared better, CEO Brad Boswell said.

His company has cut back production, but is still investing for growth in an industry far bigger than it was a decade ago, he added.

Overall, Kentucky distillers are still planning $1.45 billion in new buildings, machinery and other expansions over the next five years, economist Clark reported - on top of $2.1 billion in already-completed expansion since 2020 - betting demand will return as economic pressures fade and large overseas markets, like India, develop.

But, he warned, tariff uncertainty “could have a cooling effect” on such growth.

“Given the level of uncertainty, distillers might choose to postpone some of their planned investments,” he said.

Tourism endures

Distillers point to tourism as a cause for bullishness. Last year’s 2.7 million visits to Kentucky’s so-called Bourbon Trail were roughly flat with 2024, according to trade association KDA.

Visitors can bottle their own bourbon at Jim Beam’s plant, taste 130-year-old whiskey at $1,800 an ounce at Lofted, and peek into Heaven Hill’s spaceship-like fermenters that hum as they churn out thousands of gallons of mash.

Tourism is a key reason many smaller brands - which make most of their money from on-site sales - remain stable. Glenns Creek’s $1.5 million in 2025 revenue was about even with 2024, and higher than 2023, Meier said.

Bill Peterson, a Chicago-based residential designer who comes to the region twice a year, told Reuters he dropped at least $1,000 on whiskey bottles in one Sunday last month.

“I’m gonna stay a diehard bourbon guy,” Peterson said.

(Reporting by Nicholas P. Brown and Emma Rumney; Editing by Anna Driver)

 

U.S. trade court weighs legality of Trump 10% global tariff



Published: 

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, April 6, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

A U.S. trade court on Friday considered the legality of a 10 global import tax imposed by President Donald Trump, which several states and small businesses say sidesteps a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that invalidated most of his previous tariffs.

A group of 24 mostly Democratic-led states and two small businesses sued the Trump administration to stop the new tariffs, which went into effect on Feb. 24.

The hearing is before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Oregon’s lawyer Brian Marshall told the judges they should block the 10% tariffs rather than let them expire on the normal 150-day timeline, to keep Trump from invoking a variety of laws to keep them indefinitely.

“[If] we have a successive series where there’s always tariffs in place, that’s a problem,” Marshall said.

Marshall also said the tariffs were based on archaic authority that was meant to protect the U.S. dollar from sudden depreciation in the 1970s, when dollars could be exchanged for gold reserves held in Fort Knox.

He said that authority was meant to resolve significant “balance-of-payments deficits,” and Trump cannot repurpose it to address routine trade deficits.

Trump has made ​tariffs a central pillar of his foreign policy in his second term, claiming sweeping authority to issue tariffs without input from Congress.

The administration has said that global tariffs are a legal and appropriate response to a persistent trade deficit caused by the fact that the U.S. imports more goods than it exports.

“President Trump is lawfully using the executive powers granted to him by Congress to address our country’s balance of payments crisis,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said.

Trump imposed the new tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade ​Act of 1974, which authorizes duties of up to 15% for up to 150 days on imports during “large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits” or to prevent imminent depreciation of the dollar.

The states and small businesses argue that the Trade Act’s tariff authority is meant only to address short-term monetary emergencies, and routine trade deficits do not match the economic definition of “balance-of-payments deficits.”

Trump announced the new tariffs on February 20, the same day the Supreme Court handed him a stinging defeat when ⁠it struck down a broad swath of tariffs he had imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), ruling that the law did not give him the power he claimed.

No U.S. president before Trump had used the IEEPA or Section 122 to impose tariffs. The two lawsuits do not challenge other Trump tariffs made under more traditional legal authority, such as recent tariffs on steel, aluminum and copper imports.

(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Lisa Shumaker and Franklin Paul)

 

Canada's labour market is 'static' after a year of U.S. tariffs, population shift



Published: 26 

Workers inspect sheets of stainless steel after being pressed from coils, at Magna Stainless and Aluminum in Montreal on Thursday, Sept. 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christopher Katsarov

OTTAWA — Thursday marks one year since U.S. President Donald Trump upended the global trading system with his “Liberation Day” duties — a major step in his wider tariff campaign that’s hammered critical sectors of Canada’s labour market.

With roughly a year of employment data now in hand showing the impact of Trump’s tariffs on Canadian jobs, economists say some of the early resilience to the trade disruption is giving way to a stalled labour market. A shrinking labour pool is also throttling job growth, experts warn.

And there are now risks that weakness could be spilling over from industries hard-hit by tariffs into services and sectors not directly exposed to the new trading order.

“The labour market over the past year has been pretty stable, and maybe even a better word for that is static,” said Brendon Bernard, senior economist at job search platform Indeed.

While the particular Liberation Day tariffs were recently ruled illegal by the U.S. Supreme Court, the impact started even earlier for Canada, with threats in February that materialized into sector-specific tariffs in March that are still in effect.

Statistics Canada’s latest labour force survey for February shows the winners of losers after a year of tariffs.

Manufacturing, a sector targeted directly by steep U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum and autos, has shed 51,800 jobs over the previous 12 months, leading all industries for losses. The bulk of those lost jobs were in manufacturing-heavy Ontario.

Andrew DiCapua, principal economist at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said he is worried the pain isn’t over for the automotive industry.

Work contracts in this sector are often set over six- or 12-month periods, he said. That could mean a further “recalibration” is coming for this part of the labour market as those contracts roll off the books.

Statistics Canada said in March that the industrial capacity utilization rate — how much Canadian industries are collectively producing compared with their potential — was 78.5 per cent in the fourth quarter of last year, down modestly from the previous quarter.

“If companies are not able to produce at these high levels, well, then they don’t need the workers to fulfill orders. So I just fear that the momentum and the weakness may continue,” DiCapua said.

Desjardins senior economist Kari Norman said the impact of tariffs has been steep on an individual and sectoral basis for many Canadian workers, but the hit to the national labour market has so far not been as bad as initially feared.

Norman said the outlook for manufacturing is highly dependent on the upcoming review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement later this year.

If Canada exits that review with a firm commitment and tariff levels similar to where they stand today, Norman said she thinks “we’ll continue to see manufacturing level off, rather than decline in terms of employment.”

StatCan’s labour force survey shows goods-producing sectors have collectively lost 34,200 positions year-over-year as of February, though services industries have more than offset those losses with a gain of 85,900 positions.

Canada’s health-care sector led those gains, adding 92,000 jobs over the past year. Norman said that makes sense as provinces continue to invest in health staffing to care for an aging population.

Strength in the services sector has been one reason Canada’s unemployment rate hasn’t deteriorated sharply over the past year.

But there were signs in February of cracks in that resilience: StatCan reported an 84,000-job loss in the month, led by a contraction in services.

When there’s prolonged weakness on one side of the labour market — say, because of a rapid tariff-driven drop-off in export demand — it can spread to the other side of the economy.

DiCapua gave the example of an auto parts worker in southwest Ontario losing a regular shift, and therefore not getting a Tim Hortons coffee on the way into work. After a while, Tim Hortons might decide it also doesn’t need as many staff to meet dwindling demand and could eventually pull back on advertising too, spurring knock-on effects through the economy.

DiCapua noted that provinces seeing the hardest hits from U.S. duties such as Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia are also seeing less growth in services.

“I don’t want to draw too many conclusions on that other than to say that there could be just this general ... weaker sentiment (around) U.S. tariffs and it could be affecting sectors that are maybe not directly affected,” he said.

Bernard said it’s “not surprising” that U.S. tariffs combined with a sharply slowing housing market are leading to spillover effects in Ontario’s labour market.

Some economists also view the steep job losses in February with a grain of salt.

While the monthly labour force survey is well-known among economists for its volatility, the less timely survey of employment, payrolls and hours — the SEPH — offers a different perspective of the jobs market.

Bernard said when the labour force survey was reporting a surge of job growth in the fourth quarter of last year, the SEPH was flat. That could suggest a more stable trend than the up-and-down monthly job headlines imply.

But whichever data source Canadians prefer to look at, Bernard said one thing is clear over the past year.

“Job growth by both metrics absolutely slowed down,” he said.

“The main driver of that, though, is what’s going on with population growth and demographics.”

StatCan reported in March that the Canadian population shrank in 2025, the first year on record with an outright decline.

With a growing number of baby boomers hitting retirement age and fewer young workers coming into replace them, Bernard noted that the size of the labour force will likely be flat or even decline in the coming months.

He said that means Canada needs to add fewer jobs to keep the unemployment rate steady. Monthly employment declines would also be more commonplace in the more volatile labour force survey, he argued.

“When the trend is flat ... it’s going to be bouncing around that flat number,” Bernard said.

“Even absent the economy shifting, this is going to happen more.”

Desjardins’ outlook has the unemployment rate for 2026 holding around 6.7 per cent — right in line with February’s figures — before improving next year.

Norman said that status-quo forecast might come with a few pockets of job gains, with projected increases in government spending on defence and construction likely to spur hiring in those fields.

She also suggested that high levels of youth unemployment might come down in the summer jobs season as an energy price spike tied to the Iran war sends jet fuel and airfare costs soaring. That could push more Canadian families to vacation closer to home this year, she said.

“That should help support the tourism sector in Canada and those youth jobs that correspond to that,” she said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 2, 2026.

Craig Lord, The Canadian Press

Alberta says it’s sitting on a potential US$1 trillion lithium resource: What happens now?

ByAnam Khan
Published: April 02, 2026 


Brine sampling in progress at LithiumBank’s owned Leduc Formation well in West-Central Alberta. (LithiumBank)

Alberta is sitting on one of the largest lithium resources in the world. The challenge now is proving it can actually be produced.

The province’s rich lithium discovery is not sudden.

Scientists and oil companies knew of dissolved lithium in underground brine across oil and gas fields for decades, according to Alberta’s Ministry of Energy and Minerals, but the economics and technology were not in place to measure it or extract it.

Until recently.

Last week, the province quantified its in-place lithium resources for the first time. The Alberta Geological Survey found Alberta holds 82.5 million tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent, potentially ranking it as the third largest lithium resource in the world.


“Times have changed,” says the ministry pointing to rising demand for lithium in electric vehicles, batteries, data centres and consumer electronics.

On paper, the resource could be worth nearly US$1 trillion if produced using direct lithium extraction, a technology companies like E3 Lithium have been racing to perfect.

E3 Lithium’s 2023 DLE field pilot plant in Alberta. The plant successfully demonstrated the ability to produce battery-grade lithium concentrate from brine, supporting the transition toward commercial-scale production in Western Canada. (Photo: E3 Lithium)

The company’s CEO, Chris Doornbos cautioned the figure is theoretical, noting “you never get 100 per cent” of the value in the ground, but the report is significant.

“I think the validation is here now,” said Doornbos.

“We’ve needed more and more lithium. It’s most of what’s coming out of China today, but the big push from the G7 countries to go domestic so quickly is probably the biggest, most important moment.”

Doornbos said the shift is not about discovering lithium, but about extracting it economically, which could allow Canada to build its own battery supply chain.

“We are in deficit in the North American battery ecosystem,” he said.Canada is racing to refine this key battery ingredient at home
How companies plan to make it work

E3 Lithium has spent years developing technology to extract lithium from brine in Alberta’s Leduc reservoir, a byproduct of oil and gas operations previously considered wastewater.

The company began developing its technology in 2016, piloted it in 2023 and launched a demonstration facility in 2025.

“We’re going to see the technology prove out… demonstrating it to people who will finance this project,” said Doornbos.

“That for us commercializes lithium.”

E3 is targeting first production between 2028 and 2029, with an initial output of about 12,000 tonnes annually. Doornbos said securing financing remains one of the biggest hurdles.

E3 Lithium’s Demonstration Facility, commissioned in September 2025, has produced battery-grade lithium carbonate since its launch. Equipment is now being relocated to a new site as the company prepares to begin large-scale operations. (Photo: E3 Lithium)

Other Alberta-based companies are taking a different approach. LithiumBank is working with a major oilfield services company to scale extraction.

Alberta’s lithium is lower grade than the brines found in South America, making extraction more complex, but Alberta’s vast resource base and existing oil and gas infrastructure help offset that, says the chief operating officer of LithiumBank, Kevin Piepgrass.

“We have dozens of wells that we can potentially reuse. We have pipelines that we can reuse, roads, power lines… all these things in place that really reduces the capex,” he said.

Piepgrass said direct lithium extraction is not optional in Alberta.

“The only way it’s possible… is direct lithium extraction,” he said, noting the province cannot rely on evaporation methods used in warmer climates.

LithiumBank is targeting initial production of about 10,000 tonnes per year, with potential to scale up to 34,000 tonnes. Piepgrass said the company could see first production around 2030 if development moves ahead as planned.

Unlike some global producers that ship lithium abroad for processing, Alberta projects aim to produce battery-grade lithium domestically.
Big opportunity, but real risks remain

The reason lithium is an attractive opportunity for Canada is because it builds on Alberta’s oil and gas workforce, says John Kirton, a professor at the University of Toronto and director of the G7 Research Group.

He said lithium could “make Alberta genuinely a clean energy superpower.”

“It’s highly attractive for producing what’s called a just transition,” he said, noting oil and gas workers could transition into lithium development.

Kirton said the discovery is significant because Canada currently imports lithium largely from the United States, while exporting much of its own output south.

But he warned there are major uncertainties, like technology.

“It is still unproven at commercial scale,” he said.

He also pointed to Canada’s lack of processing capacity, noting the country is “not meaningfully in the lithium processing game,” which could require further investment.

Global competition is another challenge. Established producers like Chile and Argentina have proven extraction methods and favourable climates.

At the same time, lithium prices remain volatile. “It can just crash,” Kirton said, adding that “there’s a new technology… sodium works even better and is cheaper.”

He says while small to medium businesses may benefit from the domestic supply chains, the economic payoff for Canada as a whole could take about a decade.
Governments are betting on it

Lithium is already a priority under Canada’s Critical Minerals Strategy, with billions committed to building domestic supply chains.

Doornbos said part of that push is driven by concerns over global market dynamics, including China’s dominance in the sector.

E3 Lithium has received about $80 million in combined federal and provincial funding, while LithiumBank has received support from Alberta and is in discussions with the federal government.

Natural Resources of Canada currently ranks Canada as the sixth leading lithium producer in the world.

The department says it will update the ranking after Alberta’s recent geological report.

Anam Khan

Journalist, BNNBloomberg.ca