Wednesday, July 30, 2025

“Our Genocide”: Israeli Human Rights Groups Accuse Israel of Destroying Palestinian Society in Gaza


Story
July 29, 202
DEMOCRACY NOW!

Guests
Sarit Michaeli
outreach director for the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

Links "Our Genocide"


For the first time, two leading Israeli human rights groups — B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel — have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. B’Tselem’s report, “Our Genocide,” says, “Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip.” We speak with B’Tselem’s outreach director, Sarit Michaeli, in Tel Aviv, who says Israel’s actions in Gaza are “the textbook definition of genocide.”



WATCH | Two rights groups are first Israeli voices to accuse Israel of genocide


29 July 2025 -
By Charlotte Greenfield and Emily Rose


Israeli human rights groups hold a press conference in East Jerusalem on July 28 2025 to issue a report saying Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza.
Image: REUTERS/Ammar Awad

Two Israeli human rights organisations said on Monday Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, the first major voices in Israeli society to level the strongest possible accusation against the state, which vehemently denies it.


Rights group B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released their reports at a press conference in Jerusalem, saying Israel was carrying out “coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza strip”.

“The report we are publishing today is one we never imagined we would have to write,” said Yuli Novak, B'Tselem's executive director.

“The people of Gaza have been displaced, bombed and starved, left completely stripped of their humanity and rights.”

Physicians for Human Rights Israel focused on damage to Gaza's healthcare system, saying: “Israel's actions have destroyed Gaza's healthcare infrastructure in a manner that is calculated and systematic”.

Israel has fended off accusations of genocide since the early days of the Gaza war, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in The Hague that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned as “outrageous”.

Israel has consistently said its actions are justified as self-defence and Hamas is to blame for harm to civilians, for refusing to release hostages and surrender, and for operating in civilian areas, which the militant group denies.

A spokesperson for the Israeli government said the allegation made by the rights groups on Monday were “baseless”.

“There is no intent, (which is) key for the charge of genocide. It simply doesn't make sense for a country to send in 1.9-million tonnes of aid, most of that food, if there is an intent of genocide,” said spokesperson David Mencer.

Israel's military also rejected the reports' findings as “baseless”. It said it abides by international law and takes unprecedented measures to prevent harm to civilians while Hamas uses them as “human shields”.


Israel launched its war in Gaza after Hamas-led fighters attacked Israeli communities across the border on October 7 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza. Israel has often described that attack, the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, as genocidal.

Since then Israel's offensive has killed nearly 60,000 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials, reduced much of the enclave to ruins, and displaced nearly the entire population of more than two million.

Accusations of genocide have particular gravity in Israel because of the origins of the concept in the work of Jewish legal scholars in the wake of the Nazi Holocaust. Israeli officials have in the past said using the word against Israel was libellous and anti-Semitic.

When Amnesty International said in December Israel had committed genocidal acts, Israel's foreign ministry called the global rights group a “deplorable and fanatical organisation”.

The 1948 Genocide Convention, adopted globally after the mass murder of Jews by the Nazis, defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group”.

At a Jerusalem cafe, Carmella, a 48-year-old teacher whose grandparents survived the Holocaust, said she was distressed about the suffering an hour's drive away in Gaza.

“It feels difficult to me as an Israeli, as a Jew, to watch the images and feel anything but tremendous compassion and horror, to be honest. I feel horror.”

International attention to the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza has intensified in recent weeks, with UN agencies saying the territory is running out of food.

Israel, which controls all supplies in to Gaza, said it has let enough food in, and blamed the UN for failing to distribute it.

Israel shut off all supplies in March for nearly three months, reopening the territory in May but with restrictions it said are needed to prevent aid from ending up in the hands of fighters. Since then, its forces have shot dead hundreds of Gazans trying to reach food distribution sites, according to the UN.

Israel has announced measures in recent days to increase aid supplies, including pausing fighting in some locations and allowing airlifts of food and safer corridors for aid.

Throughout the conflict, Israeli media have tended to focus mainly on the plight of Israeli hostages in Gaza. Footage widely broadcast in other countries of destruction and casualties in Gaza is rarely shown on Israeli TV.


That has been changing, with recent images of starving children having a little more impact, said Oren Persico from The Seventh Eye, a group that tracks trends in Israeli media.

“It's very slowly evolving. You see cracks,” he said.

However, he did not expect the genocide allegation would spark a major shift in attitudes: “The Israeli perception is: 'What do you want from us? It's Hamas' fault. f it would only put down its weapons and (release) the hostages this could all be over'.”

In an editorial in the Jerusalem Post on Sunday, Dani Dayan, chair of Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, said it was not accurate to accuse Israel of committing genocide.

“However, that does not mean we should not acknowledge the suffering of civilians in Gaza. There are many men, women and children with no connection to terrorism who are experiencing devastation, displacement and loss,” he wrote.

“Their anguish is real, and our moral tradition obligates us not to turn away from it.”


Israeli rights watchdogs say Israel committing genocide in Gaza


July 29, 2025 
Anadolu Agency



Demonstrators wave Palestinian flags and hold signs reading “Stop the Genocide” during a pro-Palestinian rally in Berlin, Germany on July 26, 2025. 
[Erbil Başay – Anadolu Agency]

Israeli human rights organisation, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights- Israel (PHRI) have asserted that Israel actions against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip amount to genocide, warning that the genocide will not be limited to the Strip, but may extend to other areas.

“An examination of Israel’s policy in the Gaza Strip and its horrific outcomes, together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack, leads us to the unequivocal conclusion that Israel is taking coordinated action to intentionally destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip” B’Tselem said in a report on Monday.

The rights watchdog added that the Israeli genocidal acts against the Palestinians include forced displacement and clear attempts at ethnic cleansing, whereas Israeli prisons have also been transformed into torture camps where thousands of Palestinians are detained without trial, amid gross human rights violations.

B’Tselem noted that deadly crimes are being committed against Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Jerusalem without any form of accountability, confirming a systematic attack on Palestinian identity through the deliberate destruction of refugee camps.

It also noted that Israel is also attempting to inflict significant damage to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), calling for the protection of the agency’s vital role in providing essential services to Palestinian refugees.

‘Worst-case scenario of famine’ unfolding in Gaza: IPC report

It also confirmed that it has documented hundreds of incidents of extreme and unprecedented violence against Palestinians in various areas.

“The extremist, far-right messianic government is using fear to promote an agenda of destruction and expulsion. The lives of all Palestinians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, are being treated as worthless. They can be starved, killed, displaced – and the situation keeps getting worse. The world must stop the crimes Israel is committing now” said B’Tselem Executive Director Yuli Novak.

For its part, PHRI issued a report including a detailed legal-medical analysis of Israel’s ongoing military assault in Gaza.

The report concluded that the onslaught meets the criteria for genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, to which Israel is a signatory.

PHRI called on health and humanitarian communities worldwide to act urgently in response to the humanitarian catastrophe, which demands immediate intervention and global solidarity.

B’Tselem and PHRI have harshly criticised the international community, which, whether through active support or inaction, is complicit in Israel’s attacks on Gaza. They called on world leaders to use every means available under international law to stop Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.


“Deliberate, Systematic Starvation”: Aid Leader Demands End to Israel’s War & Siege on Gaza

DEMOCRACY NOW!
July 29, 2025

Guests

Jan Egeland
secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council.

Links  Norwegian Refugee Council
 
The Norwegian Refugee Council, one of the largest independent aid organizations in Gaza, says it has been unable to bring new supplies into the territory as starvation grows more dire for Palestinians. Democracy Now! speaks with Jan Egeland, NRC’s secretary general, who says Western powers who have been complicit in Israel’s blockade of Gaza have their “fingerprints … all over a crime scene, and history will judge.”



“Designed as Death Traps”: Fmr. Green Beret Who Worked at Gaza Food Sites Reveals Rampant War Crimes


DEMOCRACY NOW!
July 29, 2025



Guests

U.S. military veteran who worked with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as a security contractor.


As more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid at militarized aid distribution sites run by the U.S.- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a former GHF security contractor tells Democracy Now! he saw U.S. mercenaries and Israeli forces commit war crimes by indiscriminately shooting at starving Palestinians waiting for aid. “What I witnessed in Gaza, I can only describe as a dystopian, post-apocalyptic wasteland,” says Anthony Aguilar, a retired U.S. soldier who worked as a subcontractor with UG Solutions in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid delivery operation. “We, the United States, are complicit. We are involved, hand in hand, in the atrocities and the genocide that is currently undergoing in Gaza.”



Transcript
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: “The worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip.” That’s the dire warning issued today by the world’s leading hunger monitor. This comes as the official death toll in Gaza has topped 60,000, but that’s widely viewed to be a vast undercount. At least 147 Palestinians, including 88 children, have starved to death. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied there’s any starvation in Gaza, but on Monday President Trump contradicted Netanyahu’s claim.


PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We can save a lot of people. I mean, some of those kids are — that’s real starvation stuff. I see it, and you can’t fake that.

AMY GOODMAN: In related news, a group of at least 21 U.S. senators has written to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, urging the U.S. to stop funding the shadowy U.S.- and Israeli-backed so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which was created to take over aid deliveries in Gaza, replacing the United Nations. Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen is the lead author of the letter. He appeared on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday and said the aid sites have been turned into death traps.


SEN. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN: American taxpayers should not be spending one penny to fund this private organization, backed by mercenaries and by the IDF, that has become a death trap. Over a thousand people have died from being shot and killed as starving people crowd to try to get food at just these four sites.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re joined now in Raleigh, North Carolina, by Anthony Aguilar, a whistleblower who worked as a subcontractor in Gaza as part of the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid delivery operation. He resigned from his job with UG Solutions after witnessing Palestinians being fatally shot as they sought food at aid sites. Anthony Aguilar is a retired lieutenant colonel who served for 25 years in the U.S. Army Special Forces as a Green Beret.

Anthony, thanks so much for joining us on Democracy Now! Can you start off by talking about your experience in Gaza and telling us exactly what you saw?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: Thank you. It’s an honor to be here and to share this story. I do not call this my story. I call this the story of the oppressed, the story of the Palestinians in Gaza who are dying at the hands of starvation and violence.

What I witnessed in Gaza, I can only describe as a dystopian, post-apocalyptic wasteland. We — we, the United States — are complicit. We are involved, hand in hand, in the atrocities and the genocide that is currently undergoing in Gaza. For anyone who says that there is no starvation or mass hunger, or that not only are we at the precipice, but we have stepped over the line of wide-scale famine, to anyone who says that that’s not happening, shame on you. Shame on you. It’s inhumane.

What I witnessed in Gaza at all four distribution sites — I didn’t just go to one for a photo-op. I didn’t go to one to watch a distribution and then say, “Yes, this looks great.” I spent days on end in Gaza at all four distribution sites, at Kerem Shalom, where the aid is loaded for distribution, and at both operation centers that control the daily convoys, logistics operations and distribution for the four sites. What I saw on the sites, around the sites, to and from the sites, can be described as nothing but war crimes, crimes against humanity, violations of international law. This is not hyperbole. This is not platitudes or drama. This is the truth.

I break that down by what I would describe as the sites themselves. I spoke to Senator Van Hollen last week, and we had a very frank discussion on the status of the sites and what’s at these sites. The sites have not only become death traps, they were designed as death traps. All four distribution locations were intentionally, deliberately constructed, planned and built in the middle of an active combat zone. Some may argue, “Well, all of Gaza is a war zone.” That may be true, but there are parts of Gaza that are direct — or, determined to be active, operational combat zones where Israeli Defense Forces are operating. Those sites were built in the middle of those areas intentionally. It’s not by accident. That, in and of itself, to designate humanitarian distribution sites to service an unarmed, starving population, to build them deliberately in an active combat zone, is a violation of the Geneva Convention protocols. It’s a violation of humanitarian law. And in my opinion, it’s a violation of humanity in general.

The sites, not only where they were built, all four sites around the perimeter and the roads leading in and out are barricaded by razor wire — not barbed wire, not concertina wire that we use in warfare for obstacle obstruction or for paths. Razor wire. Geneva Conventions specifically prohibit the use of razor wire to restrict areas that civilians are servicing — hospitals, water points, food distribution points. And we’re using it. Not only did the IDF provide it for us to use it on the sites, we, UG Solutions, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, asked for it specifically. Razor wire is designed to maim and kill, and we’re using that to channelize and herd, if you will, thousands of unarmed, starving civilians. That’s a war crime.

The actions on the sites — escalation of force, no standard operating procedures to dictate that, no rules of engagement provided to the armed contractors on the ground, the indiscriminate use of force, lethal and nonlethal, against unarmed civilians. I want to make that clear. We aren’t there on the distribution sites defending ourselves against Hamas. We are using indiscriminate force, targeting civilians, escalation of force that goes far beyond the measures of appropriate, against an unarmed, starving population.

The equipment, the equipment that we were issued, fully automatic weapons, which, in and of itself, is not a violation of protocol. However, we were issued M855 green-tipped ammunition. That’s important, because green-tipped ammunition is a steel-jacketed copper round that’s designed to — specifically designed to penetrate armor. It’s designed to kill. It’s designed to shoot through reinforced objects, to kill someone on the other side of it. That’s what all the UG Solutions contractors are equipped with right now in country. Everyone carries a standard basic load of 210 rounds of M855 armor-piercing military combat ammunition. Why would anyone need that, even if to defend themselves for their — defend their lives, against an unarmed population? It’s inappropriate. That, in and of itself, that action there, is a war crime.

I’d call the status of our — of us being in the country — every UG Solutions contract American, U.S. citizens, in Israel, that are armed with fully automatic weapons in Gaza as we speak, today, right now, and have been since the 26th of May, we are in the country on a B2 entry visa as tourists. We are in the country as tourists. So, if a family member wanted to go to Israel to visit Jerusalem, they would enter Israel on a tourist visa. That’s the legal status that armed American citizens are in Gaza right now with the authority to use hostile force against an unarmed civilian on a tourist visa. That is a violation of humanitarian international law, period.

The things that I just described are not just opinions, they’re facts. The sites were designed to lure, bait, aid and kill. The food that we distribute, nowhere near enough. To Mr. Johnnie Moore, shame on you for celebrating 92 million meals delivered into Gaza. Shame on you. It’s a very simple equation: 92 divided by 2.2 million people, divided by 3 million — or, three meals a day. That’s what GHF proclaims. We’ve been distributing aid since the 26th of May, 26th May to now the 29th of June, 64 days of continuous distribution, and we’ve only managed to distribute 92 million meals. When you break that down, again, it’s a simple equation. That’s 14 days of meals. So, out of 64 days, we’ve provided 14 days of meals to the entire population in the enclave of Gaza. That’s inhumane. That would be like saying that you only eat every fourth day — you only eat on Thursday, and you only eat on Monday. And to say that that’s humanitarian? So, to anyone that says that that’s enough or — not even close to enough. The narrative of GHF needs help to do the rest, you don’t need help, because you’re not even anywhere close to where we need to be.

The fact is, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is not trained, equipped, manned or staffed to run humanitarian aid and humanitarian assistance of this magnitude. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation needs to be defunded, shut down, and the United Nations needs to be allowed back in, in full scale, supported by the United States, resourced, helped. Instead of giving the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation $60 million, use that $60 million to support the United Nations mechanism to get 400 sites back to operating, to feed 2.1 million people every day. That was the capacity of the United Nations.

So, what I saw in Gaza, to me, concerns me as an American. What we are doing in Gaza, in being complicit with what the Israeli Defense Forces are doing, is un-American. I didn’t come forward to talk because I want to disregard the struggle and the fight. I stand with Israel against Hamas and their atrocities. The world stands with Israel against Hamas and their atrocities. No one would argue that October 7th wasn’t atrocious. But if we, as a nation, the United States, and Israel, our closest — one of our closest allies, if we go down the road of saying we’re doing what Hamas did, and saying that that’s OK, we are losing our humanity. And we cannot go down that road. It’s un-American. It’s not in line with our values.

Two months ago, I hung up my uniform after 25 years of service to this nation. I didn’t hang up my oath. I swore an oath to the Constitution. I didn’t swear an oath to the president, to the Congress, to a boss, to a contract, to a paycheck. I swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States of America. And that Constitution is underlined in American values, dignity, respect, respect for human life. Right now America is on a dangerous road. And if we don’t stop now, end this and back the humanitarian aid process that should be going into Gaza, shame on us, un-American. I’m going to make sure the truth is known.

AMY GOODMAN: Anthony Aguilar is a retired lieutenant colonel Green Beret, as he said, 25 years of service in the U.S. military, was awarded the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star in combat in 2005. How did you come to work at the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation? How were you recruited? Who were you exactly working for? Are you considered a U.S. government employee? Were you?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: I was not considered a U.S. government employee. I was specifically hired as an independent subcontractor under UG Solutions, which held this subcontract under the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, specifically for the armed security and protection of the aid. I was contacted by UG Solutions on the 13th of May. They were specifically looking for retired, recently retired military personnel who had special operations background. So I was contacted by them for that reason and asked if I would be interested in joining UG Solutions on this operation.

AMY GOODMAN: The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has dismissed your testimony, Anthony, accusing you of making false claims with no basis in reality. The GHF said, quote, “It should be emphasized that Mr. Aguilar was employed as a subcontractor and was fired over a month ago for inappropriate behavior. Following the dismissal, we received threats that unless he was reinstated, action would be taken against us, raising questions regarding the motivation behind his interviews. We also have evidence that he likely forged documents and presented misleading videos to promote his false narrative.” Again, this is the accusation of the GHF. Can you respond to what they’ve said, and talk about the videos that they’re talking about?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: What I find interesting about stating that the claims I make have no basis in reality, I provided videos. Those videos have been analyzed in their metadata and geolocation. In fact, UG Solutions themselves posted one of my videos on their press release website, showing the exact same thing, stating, “Here’s the whole story,” simply just showing what the video showed with UG Solutions contractors shooting at civilians. It’s outlandish.

Back to the question of me being fired or not, when I was — the short period of time that I was on contract, 41 days I was on contract, in that short period of time, UG Solutions promoted me twice, gave me a pay raise twice, asked me to take on more and more responsibility, relied on me for my expertise. I terminated my employment on the 13th of June in writing. I terminated that employment under the clear reasons that I could no longer be a part of this unethical, inhumane operation. After I tendered my resignation on the 13th of June, UG Solutions asked me to stay, to reconsider. They continued to pay me for an entire pay period. They continued to cover my life insurance. They continued to pay for all of my expenses until the 26th of June. If UG Solutions terminated me or fired me on the 13th of June, why would they continue to pay me my full pay, my coverage, and pay for all my expenses through the 26th of June, asking me to stay and reconsider my position? I wasn’t fired. I resigned because I could no longer be a part of it.

In terms of performance, all of the operations, the convoy operation plans, the distribution plans, the operational plans, I generated. I wrote them for UG Solutions because they did not have anyone on their staff who had the requisite experience, knowledge and expertise to do that type of work. So, you’re welcome, UG Solutions. You’re welcome, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, because if it weren’t for me and other contractors that have skill, former Green Berets, former veterans, if it weren’t for us — they’re doing the work — you wouldn’t be able to operate at all. No one in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, from Johnnie Moore to Phil Reilly of SRS to Jameson Govoni of UG Solutions, have any experience in in-depth planning and operational planning, period, much less for a humanitarian assistance mission.
They’re understaffed. They’re underqualified. And they’re in way over their head for a mission that they should not have.

AMY GOODMAN: I just want to explain to people, according to The New York Times, Johnnie Moore is “a former Trump campaign adviser, was appointed to the board of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. … Moore was [co-chair] of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign’s evangelical advisory board and an influential figure during … Trump’s first administration. He was part of a coalition of Christian leaders who paid regular visits to the White House, … as well as prayer meetings in the Oval Office.” His PR company, Kairos, was acquired in 2022 by JDA Worldwide. He “now serves as president of that larger firm. When he announced the acquisition on social media, … Moore referred to his work in public relations as his 'day job,' as he has had many other roles and projects linked to his faith and interest in foreign policy, including writing books on the persecution of Christians in the Middle East and Africa.” He told The New York Times “he and other evangelicals had pressed … Trump to recognize Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem and to move the U.S. Embassy there.” He, “like many evangelicals, including Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, is committed to a Jewish state based on his interpretation of the Bible.”

I wanted to go to one of the videos you shared with the BBC showing armed American guards working with GHF opening fire at an aid site in Gaza on May 29th. This is a short excerpt.


U.S. CONTRACTOR: I think you hit one.

AMY GOODMAN: “I think you hit one.” That’s what we hear someone saying. Who was saying that, Anthony? And describe what we’re seeing and hearing in this video. Who is firing? Who are they shooting at?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: In that video, the firing that you hear is gunfire from an assault rifle being fired by a UG Solutions independent security contractor. That individual is firing at a group of unarmed civilians who have left the site. That is distribution site number four in the central — up in central Gaza, near the Netzarim Corridor. The Palestinians had left the site. They were moving south, back towards the bridge over Gadi or Waza — or, Wadi Gaza, back into Bureij, where they — the town they came from.

This individual was shooting at them, at their feet, over their heads, into the crowd. You hear the clear and distinct American voice and the shooting. That shooting is very close to that camera, where I am standing. I filmed that video, not Hamas, not the Gaza Health Ministry, not some biased agent news media outlet. I filmed that, an American. That individual that’s shooting, you hear him clearly say, “Woo hoo!” cheering. And the response from the other contractor on the ground, who was standing about 15 feet from me, who says, “I think you got one.” And at the same time, the other contractor then responds with, “Hell, yeah, boy!” What they are talking about is the got one is a human being, a civilian, an unarmed, starving civilian, who came to our site to get food, who was returning home. Why did we shoot at him? Because we wanted them to leave faster.

That video is genuine. It’s been time-stamped analyzed. It’s been geolocated. It’s been — the metadata has been assessed. In fact, in fact, UG Solutions themselves posted that exact same video on their press release page to refute the video itself. So they used the video that I filmed to refute the video that I filmed.

AMY GOODMAN: So, UG Solutions, who you worked for, is a U.S. mercenary firm. GHF distribution sites are guarded by two U.S. security firms, Safe Reach Solutions, SRS, and UG Solutions — SRS run by a former high-ranking CIA officer tied to a U.S. private equity firm in Chicago, according to Middle East Eye. How did you get recruited?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: Again, UG — so, I was not recruited by Safe Reach Solutions or the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. I didn’t work for them. I was a subcontractor specifically under UG Solutions. UG Solutions is located in Davidson, North Carolina. So, they were first reaching out to retired special operators, special operations forces soldiers who had that specific skill set, who were local to North Carolina, because it would have been very — it would have been quicker and easier to recruit them and get them onboarded.

So, I was called by UG Solutions. When the operation was first explained to me, I felt that — I felt that it was a noble cause. One thing that I will agree with Johnnie Moore in this, one thing he has said early on, there is nothing more Christian than feeding people. I would agree with that. What I don’t agree with is that what we are doing is not that — lying, covering the truth, under the auspice of feeding people for profit. Remember, these are private organizations. The person in charge of Safe Reach Solutions is a former CIA officer and part of a private equity firm. That’s who we have in charge of distributing humanitarian aid to a starving population? So, when I first went into this, I was excited. I felt it was a noble cause. Within hours of being in Israel and seeing how this was going to unfold, I immediately had dire concerns as to the intentions, as to the execution, and what was going to happen when this fails.

AMY GOODMAN: Did other people share your feelings? And is it accurate to call you, though you’re a former retired Green Beret, a lieutenant colonel in Special Forces for years — is it accurate to call you a mercenary, as you worked with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation?

ANTHONY AGUILAR: So, I would not refer to myself as a mercenary, nor would I refer to myself as a whistleblower. I’m a patriotic American who wants America to know the truth. When I took this contract to go on this mission, my motivations were clear. I wanted to use my years of expertise, my experience in planning, my experience in executing operations of a large-scale magnitude to contribute to this mission succeeding. That’s what I wanted.

I retired. I recently had retired, thoroughly enjoyed being a stay-at-home dad, watching The Golden Girls in the afternoon and enjoying my afternoon walks with my dog, enjoyed that. I didn’t take on this mission for personal gain or money. I took on this mission because I believed in it. I resigned my contract and left, walked away from the money — and they were paying us a lot of money — walked away from that money, because nothing is going to buy my soul. Nothing is going to pay for my values and my patriotism as an American.

I’m an American first. I’m not a contractor. I’m not a mercenary. I’m not a whistleblower. I’m a patriotic American that wants the American people to know the truth of what we are involved in, in a very complex and complicated environment that, quite frankly, right now we are on the wrong side of history.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to end it there, but I want to just be very clear: You saw former U.S. military, you saw IDF, you saw the Israeli soldiers opening fire on hungry Palestinians.

ANTHONY AGUILAR: Without a doubt, yes, full stop.

AMY GOODMAN: Anthony Aguilar worked as a subcontractor with UG Solutions with the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a delivery operation so-called, retired lieutenant colonel, served for 25 years in the U.S. Army Special Forces as a Green Beret, has been awarded the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star. Thank you for joining us.

This is viewer supported news. Please do your part today.  Donate


The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.
UK warns Israel: End 'horrific situation' in Gaza or we will recognize Palestinian state

In a dramatic statement, days after France's announcement of recognition of a Palestinian state, UK PM Keir Starmer's office issues ultimatum that the kingdom would act similarly in September unless the Israeli government 'takes real steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza'; Announcement could come ahead of the UN General Assembly

Reuters|Yesterday |


Britain will recognize the state of Palestine in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the "appalling situation" in Gaza and meets other conditions, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told his cabinet on Tuesday according to a government statement.

"He said that the UK will recognize the state of Palestine in September, before UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution," the statement said.

 
UK PM Keir Starmer, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, against backdrop of Gaza
(Photos: Leo Correa, Brendan Smialoski/AFP, Ronen Zvulun/Reuters)

"He reiterated that there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm."
Starmer took the decision after recalling his cabinet during the summer holidays on Tuesday to discuss a new proposed peace plan being worked on with other European leaders and how to deliver more humanitarian aid to Gaza.

Successive British governments have said they will formally recognize a Palestinian state when the time is right, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions.

With warnings people in Gaza are facing starvation, a growing numbers of lawmakers in Starmer's Labour Party have asking him to recognize a Palestinian state to put pressure on Israel.

Meanwhile, the “UN Conference for Advancing a Two-State Solution” opened Monday in New York, initiated by France and Saudi Arabia. UN Secretary-General António Guterres stated at the start of the two-day summit—held without Israeli or American participation—that the two-state solution is “further away than ever.” Amid mounting international criticism of Israel, Guterres declared that “the destruction of Gaza has unfolded before the eyes of the world” and that alongside “Israel’s threat to annex the West Bank,” these are the main obstacles to a resolution.


UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer
(Photo: Thomas Krych / POOL / AFP)

The conference, attended by dozens of countries, is co-chaired by the foreign ministers of France and Saudi Arabia. It was originally scheduled for late June but was postponed due to the war with Iran and shortened from its planned four-day duration.
Last weekend, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognize a Palestinian state in September, during the UN General Assembly. His declaration drew widespread condemnation from Israeli political leaders, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling it “a reward for terrorism.” The Palestinian Authority and Hamas, by contrast, welcomed the initiative and thanked Macron for his support.



UK may recognize Palestinian State at UN in September: Starmer

Web Desk
July 29, 2025




LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday that Britain is ready to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September unless Israel takes a series of steps to improve the lives of Palestinians.

Britain, if it does so, would become the second Western power on the UN Security Council to do so, after France, reflecting deep isolation over Israel’s conduct in its war against Hamas in Gaza, where a humanitarian catastrophe has occurred and the Palestinian death toll has surpassed 60,000.

Starmer said Britain would take the step unless Israel takes concrete steps to allow more aid into Gaza, made clear there would be no annexation of the West Bank and was committed to a long-term peace process that provides a “two-state solution” – a Palestinian state living side by side with Israel in peace.

Starmer told reporters that the Palestinian people have suffered terrible suffering. “Now, in Gaza, because of the catastrophic failure of aid, we see images of starving children, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for the rest of our lives. The suffering must end.”

Starmer said his government would assess in September “the extent to which the parties have delivered on these measures”, but that no one would veto the decision.

He made the decision on Tuesday after recalling his cabinet from the summer recess to work with other European leaders on a new proposed peace plan and how to deliver more humanitarian aid to Gaza’s 2.2 million people.

Successive British governments have said they would formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions.

With international aid agencies warning that people in Gaza are facing food shortages, a growing number of lawmakers from Starmer’s Labour Party are stepping up pressure on Israel to recognise a Palestinian state.

The move comes as President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday that France would recognise Palestine as a state in areas it captured in the 1967 Middle East war.

Israel and the staunch supporter of the United States condemned the French move, calling it a reward for the Palestinian Hamas militants who attacked Gaza and whose attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 sparked the current war.
Ad powered by advergic.com

At the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, when Starmer was opposition leader, he fully supported Israel’s right to defend itself. But his stance has become increasingly hardline towards Israel over the years, especially since he was elected prime minister just a year ago.

His government rejected the previous government’s challenge to an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has suspended some arms sales to Israel.

Last month, Britain imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Governor and Bizet Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians.

UK Rejects Criticism That Move to Recognize Palestinian State Rewards Hamas


Demonstrators gather outside the UN Headquarters during a "Stop Starving Gaza" protest in New York City, US, July 29, 2025. (Reuters)


Asharq Al Awsa
30 July 2025
 AD ـ 05 Safar 1447 AH

Britain on Wednesday rejected criticism that it was rewarding the Hamas group by setting out plans to recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace.

The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days and on Tuesday, a hunger monitor warned that a worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding there and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline for Israel, prompted an immediate rebuke from his counterpart in Jerusalem, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of their 2023 cross-border attack.

US President Donald Trump said he did not think Hamas "should be rewarded" with recognition of Palestinian independence.

Asked about that criticism, British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to questions in a series of media interviews on Wednesday - said it was not the right way to characterize Britain's plan.

“This is not a reward for Hamas. Hamas is a vile terrorist organization that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death,” she told LBC radio.

“We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.”

France announced last week it would recognize Palestinian statehood in September.

Successive British governments have said they would recognize a Palestinian state when it was most effective to do so.

In a televised address on Tuesday, Starmer said that moment had now come, highlighting the suffering in Gaza and saying the prospect of a two-state solution - a Palestinian state coexisting in peace alongside Israel - was under threat.

Starmer said Britain would make the move at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and committed to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution.
West Bank town of Sinjil terrorized by settlers


Synne Bjerkestrand
29 July 2025


The aftermath of a settler attack in Sinjil, 23 April. 
Faiz Abu RmelehActiveStills

Muhammad Olwan, 47, has lived in the West Bank town of Sinjil his whole life, and he said that this year is the worst he has experienced.

“The occupation is doing everything it can to make us leave our land,” he said. “But where should we go? I will never flee no matter what, this is our homeland.”

Olwan is a local coordinator of the Palestinian Farmers’ Union, an organization of Palestinian farmers that supports them as they defend their rights in occupied Palestine. He lives with his wife and four children in this town of 7,500 inhabitants northeast of Ramallah.

On a rainy afternoon this past March, Olwan drove The Electronic Intifada along a winding road to the top of the village, which consists of narrow streets lined with white stone houses. At the lookout point, Olwan pointed to the hilltops about 500 meters away.

“Up there, you see one of the five illegal Israeli settlements,” he said.

The settlement, Shilo, is surrounded by a concrete wall, and the houses are mostly built with red-orange pitched roofs that are distinct from the white-stone Palestinian homes in the area.

The Israeli occupation heavily monitors and controls Sinjil, isolating it from the rest of the West Bank and subjecting its residents to surveillance and its homes and farms to demolition and razing.

Israeli settlers terrorize the Palestinian residents of Sinjil and have set fire to their homes and attacked individuals with clubs and stones. This past July, three months after The Electronic Intifada’s visit, attacks by Israeli settlers on Sinjil intensified.

On 11 July, settlers “beat to death” Saif al-Din Musalat, a 20-year-old US citizen who was visiting relatives. Musalat’s family said that he was killed while “protecting his family’s land from settlers who were attempting to steal it.” The settlers had been attempting to build an illegal outpost on the family’s land.

The same settlers shot and killed Muhammad Rizq Hussein al-Shalabi, 23. Both men died after settlers prevented ambulances from reaching them.

Lockdown

To get to Sinjil this past March, The Electronic Intifada took a taxi from Ramallah. The driver took us north, past the settlement of Beit El and its concrete walls punctuated by booths where, presumably, armed soldiers sat inside. Graffiti by one checkpoint read in Arabic: “No future in Palestine.”

Five of the six entrances to the village were closed, blocked by rocks. Since October 2023, the Israeli army has closed nearly all entrances to Sinjil.

Olwan took The Electronic Intifada on a tour of Sinjil to listen to the stories of what daily life is like in this village and to understand and see the legacy of the occupation’s long history of land theft and violence.

Mrawah Abdul Haq was only 13 years old when Israel expanded its occupation to the West Bank in 1967. He clearly remembers how and when the settlements were established. Since then, he has been attacked three times by armed Israelis. The last time was in 2024, when he was 70 years old.

Settlers came and attacked him while he was harvesting olives, and broke his arm.

“They attack us just because we are Palestinians, a form of collective punishment,” he said. “I’m not a politician or a soldier, I’m just a human who demands to live on my land.”

His family had better access to roads and land before 1967, since they were not blocked off as they are now. Now, he cannot enter the field where he used to work, as the Israeli army has closed off all the entrances to the village but one.

Furthermore, the Israeli occupation “accelerated the construction of a new separation wall” around Sinjil in January 2025, according to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, destroying Palestinian homes and farms.

The wall is designed to further cut Palestinians off from their land and isolate the town from the rest of the West Bank.

Two of Abdul Haq’s grandchildren ran around in the living room, playing and laughing with each other and hugging their grandfather as he recalled his experiences during the first intifada in 1987.

The Israeli army forced the family from their home and blew it up. He spent some time in jail. The family lived in tents for over seven months before they could return to the wreckage of their home.

“My wife was pregnant with our son, but he died in her womb when we were living in the tent, as a result of the conditions she was living under,” he said.

He and his family eventually rebuilt the four-story house where they now live.

He said that the Israelis are trying to drive Palestinians away by any means: violence, forced displacement and threats.

“They want to destroy our love for our land in any way,” Abdul Haq said. “They don’t want Palestinian farmers to be in contact with their land. It’s ugly and evil in a way that’s impossible to describe.”

Farms turned into grazing land


In mid-October 2023, Israeli settlers stole the farmland of Palestinian farmer Hussam Aida.

A group of settlers, along with backing from the Israeli army, came early one morning to check the area. They uprooted olive trees and took over the area.

“I haven’t been there since,” he said. “I risk being killed because the settlers guard it with weapons. They can shoot us at any time, they have permission from the authorities.”

Several Israelis have stolen land by letting their sheep graze in Palestinian areas, he said, then they claim the area as their own and deny Palestinians access.

The Israelis have destroyed what Aida describes as a paradise that once had an abundance of fruit and vegetables. It is now a grazing area for livestock.

Aida has been to court four times to try and regain access to his land, but he has lost every time.

“What do you expect to happen when the judge is your enemy?” he said. “They control everything. Everything is illegal for Palestinians here. Everything is illegal under the occupation.”

Murder of Yousef Fuqahaa

Since The Electronic Intifada’s visit in March, the village has witnessed continued violence, displacement and terror at the hands of settlers who occupy the lands near the village and the army that supports them.

Olwan wrote to The Electronic Intifada via WhatsApp on 3 June that “all villages [in the West Bank] became a prison.”

On 2 June, the occupation forces shot and killed 14-year-old Yousef Fuad Abdel Karim Fuqahaa.

“The village of Sinjil, along with all local institutions and residents, mourns the loss of this innocent boy,” he wrote.

Defense for Children International - Palestine, reported that “Israeli forces opened fire on [Fuqahaa] suddenly and without warning around 3 pm” at the northern entrance to Sinjil and then confiscated his body.

“The deliberate killing of children, followed by the inhumane withholding of their bodies,” wrote Olwan, “reflects a systematic attempt to terrorize Palestinian communities and suppress their resilience.”

Olwan described the killing of Fuqahaa as “part of a broader pattern of escalating violations against Palestinian civilians.”

On 19 and 20 June, the occupation forces uprooted more than 86 olive trees from privately owned Palestinian land along the old Nablus road, on the northern side of Sinjil.

The olive trees belonged to six landowners, Olwan wrote.

Synne Bjerkestrand is an independent journalist based in Jordan.


Patriarchs, heads of churches condemn settler attack on Christian town in occupied West Bank

Church leaders say assault on Taybeh part of alarming pattern of settler violence, urge Israel to ensure accountability


Tarek Chouiref |29.07.2025 - Update : 29.07.2025

West Bank (Photo by Mamoun Wazwaz)

JERUSALEM/ISTANBUL

Patriarchs and heads of churches in Jerusalem on Tuesday strongly condemned a settler assault on the Christian town of Taybeh in the central West Bank, calling it part of a disturbing pattern of violence aimed at intimidating Palestinian communities.

In a joint statement, the church leaders said several vehicles were set ablaze and racist graffiti was sprayed during the attack, describing it as “an unambiguous act of intimidation directed at a peaceful and faithful community rooted in the land of Christ.”

They noted that masked settlers, some armed and others on horseback, had recently raided the town, threatening residents and even reaching the walls of the historic Church of St. George.

The statement criticized Israeli police for reducing the incident to mere property damage, saying such omissions “distort the truth and fail to address violations of international humanitarian and human rights law, including the right to religious freedom and the protection of cultural heritage.”

The church leaders also denounced “reactionary disinformation campaigns” by settler-affiliated groups, warning that such narratives sought to discredit victims and deflect international scrutiny.

They urged the Israeli government to hold perpetrators accountable, ensure consistent protection for the people of Taybeh, and uphold its obligations under international law.

According to the Palestinian news agency Wafa, a group of illegal settlers raided Taybeh early Monday, torching two vehicles and spray-painting racist slogans on the wall of a Palestinian home. Israeli forces later entered the town with several military vehicles following the assault.

The Palestinian Foreign Ministry condemned the attack, saying it reflected “disregard for international reactions” to earlier settler assaults on the town, including attacks on its cemetery and the historic Church of St. George earlier this month. The ministry urged “firm international measures” to compel Israel to end settler violence and bring those responsible to justice.

Last month, illegal settlers also set up a new outpost on the ruins of Palestinian homes demolished after violent attacks in Taybeh last year.

Following the July 7 assault on the town’s cemetery and church, patriarchs, church heads, and diplomats from over 20 Arab and foreign countries visited Taybeh in solidarity with its residents.

Since the start of Israel’s genocidal war on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, at least 1,009 Palestinians have been killed and more than 7,000 injured in the West Bank by Israeli forces and illegal settlers, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.

In a landmark opinion last July, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and called for the evacuation of all settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Most US adults have hearts older than their actual age. How old is yours?


New heart age calculator reframes cardiovascular risk to boost preventive care



Northwestern University





CHICAGO --- Most U.S. adults have a “heart age” several years older than their chronological age — sometimes by more than a decade. And that gap is wider among men and among those with lower incomes or education or who identify as Black or Hispanic, according to a new study led by Northwestern Medicine.

As part of the study, the Northwestern scientists created a free online tool that calculates a person’s “heart age” based on their risk for cardiovascular disease, using routine health data such as blood pressure, cholesterol levels and whether a person smokes or has diabetes. The study team stressed that the calculator is not a substitute for clinical care and should be used in consultation with a doctor.

The study will be published July 30 in JAMA Cardiology.

Traditionally, heart disease risk has been calculated as a percentage. For example, a health care clinician may tell a patient, “8 out of 100 people with your profile may have a heart event in the next 10 years.” The new calculator, based on the American Heart Association’s PREVENT equations, reframes that risk as an age to make it easier for patients to understand.

“We hope this tool helps doctors and patients discuss risk for heart disease more effectively so we can better inform what therapies can prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events from ever happening,” said senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan, the Magerstadt professor of cardiovascular epidemiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, who led the development of the PREVENT equations.

Evaluating the tool on Americans

To evaluate the age calculator, Khan and her team tested it on more than 14,000 nationally representative U.S. adults, ages 30 to 79, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. All participants had no prior history of cardiovascular disease.

On average, they found that women had a heart age of 55.4, compared to a chronological age of 51.3. For men, the age gap was wider: an average heart age of 56.7 compared to an average chronological age of 49.7.

Among men with a high school education or less, nearly one-third had a heart age more than 10 years older than their actual age. The discordance between heart and chronological age was also significantly wider among adults who identified as Black or Hispanic.

Black men had a heart age 8.5 years older than their actual age, compared to 7.9 years for Hispanic men, 6.7 years for Asian men and 6.4 years for white men. The gaps were 6.2 years for Black women, 4.8 years for Hispanic women, 3.7 years for white women and 2.8 years for Asian women.

Especially important for young adults

Even with major gains in public health, heart disease has remained the leading cause of death in the U.S. for more than a century. That’s partly because many adults who could benefit from preventive care still aren’t getting it, Khan said.

“Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications. We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people,” said Khan, who also is an associate professor of medicine (cardiology) at Feinberg and a Northwestern Medicine preventive cardiologist.

“The important thing is that we have very good options available in our toolbox to help slow that aging down if we can identify it. This may be even more important in younger people who don’t often think about their risk for heart disease,” Khan added.

Khan said her team now plan to study whether presenting risk this way improves outcomes and helps people better understand their need for preventive therapies.

The study is titled, “PREVENT Risk Age Equations and Population Distribution in US Adults.”

 

Debunking a life-threatening myth: "Tongue swallowing prevention" maneuvers delay CPR and might contribute to brain injury or death for collapsed athletes



Analysis in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology exposes media-fueled misconceptions and an urgent need for immediate public and professional re-education



Elsevier






Philadelphia, July 30, 2025 – Despite widespread public health efforts, the dangerous myth of "prevention of tongue swallowing" continues to persist during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). New research in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, published by Elsevier, exposes the mainstream and social media’s detrimental role in perpetuating this misconception, which often leads to critical delays in proper CPR for collapsed athletes.

Concern about “tongue swallowing” leads resuscitators to waste valuable time trying to remove the tongue from the airway path, rather than immediately initiating essential CPR procedures. The findings from this analysis underscore an urgent need for global public health campaigns to correct CPR myths and emphasize the importance of immediate chest compressions. The study systematically analyzed 45 cases of athletes collapsing during sports events (1990–2024) that were caught on video or documented online, focusing on initial resuscitation actions and corresponding media coverage.

Commenting on the main findings of the analysis, lead investigator of the article "The Myth of “Tongue Swallowing” Delays Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Athletes With Cardiac Arrest, Yet It Is Often Perpetuated by the Media" Dana Viskin, MD, Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, says, “Our analysis showed that in 84% of cases where the initial response was visible, inappropriate maneuvers to ‘prevent tongue swallowing’ were performed before proper CPR. These incorrect actions were significantly associated with poor outcomes: 67% of those receiving such maneuvers died or had severe brain injury, compared to 0% when CPR was the first response.”

Media analysis revealed that nearly half (48%) of high-exposure news articles explicitly used the term “tongue swallowing,” with most praising the lay responder for their actions. In articles describing sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) cases, 77% referenced “tongue swallowing” without acknowledging its inappropriateness as a response to SCA, yet only 23% explicitly criticized the intervention.

“Given that some SCA patients, particularly young males with shockable arrest rhythms, may exhibit seizure-like activity at onset – a pattern frequently observed in sports-related SCA – it is understandable how this myth may have carried into the public response to athletic SCA, despite the absence of clinical guideline support for such an intervention,” points out the author of the accompanying editorial "Countering Misinformation in the Response to Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Athletes" Nicholas Grubic, MSc, Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. “Furthermore, signs such as cyanosis and agonal respirations can be mistaken for choking, often prompting bystanders to prioritize airway inspection over initiating CPR. Recent qualitative research has confirmed that such misinterpretations can delay or even interrupt life-saving interventions. Although promoting CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) knowledge remains a cornerstone of SCA education, teaching the public to recognize the early signs of an arrest is equally critical, as every second without action drastically reduces the chance of survival.”

This research is especially important now, as public CPR education becomes increasingly vital with widespread media exposure to cardiac arrests in sports.

"Our study highlights the dangerous and persistent misconception of ‘tongue swallowing prevention,’ which can delay the initiation of life-saving chest compressions. These delays may cost lives, and yet the media often praise such misguided actions as heroic. We urgently need to re-educate the public and the media and reframe the narrative around CPR, especially in sports," emphasizes Dr. Viskin.

Mr. Grubic adds in conclusion, “Coordinated, evidence-informed communication strategies are essential to counter misinformation and support public understanding, particularly in high-stakes situations such as the response to SCA in athletes. Our public capacity to save lives should not be impeded by misinformed voices – now is the time for the academic, healthcare, and media sectors to join forces and build a healthier information environment for all. Responding to SCA is a team sport that starts with proper education to ensure that everyone is ready to step in, stay focused, and act. Although the prize is not a trophy, it is something much more valuable.”