Monday, June 22, 2026

 

Long-term benzodiazepine use is less likely when shorter courses, a single medication or short-acting agents are prescribed, per cohort study of more than 1.8 million Canadian adults which could inform prescribing practices



PLOS
Long-term benzodiazepine use is less likely when shorter courses, a single medication or short-acting agents are prescribed, per cohort study of more than 1.8 million Canadian adults which could inform prescribing practices 

image: 

Researchers assess long-term benzodiazepine use in Canada.

view more 

Credit: Haley Lawrence, Unsplash (CC0, https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)


 

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available paper in PLOS Medicine: https://plos.io/4uxybkF

Article title: Association between initial benzodiazepine prescribing patterns and time to benzodiazepine discontinuation: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Author countries: Canada

Funding: This study was funded by a Womenmind Grant to co-principal investigators NB and TG https://www.camh.ca/en/get-involved/join-the-cause/womenmind. The Funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

MUTUAL AID

How animals communicate to work together across species boundaries






University of Cape Town - Faculty of Science

Mongoose-warthog cooperation 

image: 

Banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) can cooperate with common warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus) by cleaning them, removing ticks and other parasites, while the warthogs provide access to food and safety from predators through their vigilance and presence. Example footage from Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda.

view more 

Credit: Leela Channer






An international team of researchers has published a new review in Animal Behaviour revealing how communication enables cooperation between different animal species. The review highlights how movements, visual displays, calls, and other behavioural cues and signals help partners coordinate interactions and align interests across species boundaries.

From birds guiding humans to bees’ nests in return for access to beeswax, to cleaner fish removing ectoparasites from larger reef fishes in exchange for a meal: cooperation between species occurs across a remarkable range of ecological settings. By gathering examples from birds, fish, insects and mammals, the authors highlight the diverse ways that animals exchange information to organise their actions and sustain mutually beneficial partnerships.

Active teamwork between species

Cooperation between animal species requires individuals to coordinate the timing of their actions to achieve shared benefits, often across distinct sensory worlds. For example, the greater honeyguide bird (Indicator indicator) uses specialised calls to guide humans to bees’ nests and responds to human calls in return, while warthogs actively solicit cleaning from bird and mammal cleaners through distinctive body poses.

“From the examples we know, individuals coordinate their actions to access shared resources, like food, or to exchange resources for services, such as protection from predators,” said Dr Katie Dunkley, lead author and researcher at the University of Oxford. “We were particularly interested in how sharing information allows such close coordination between species.”

Balancing benefits and risks

Cues and signals help animals identify cooperative partners, initiate interactions, and ensure they benefit from the partnership. Because interacting with members of another species can carry risks, communication is also important for avoiding individuals that might exploit them.

For example, some cleaner fish (e.g. Labroides dimidiatus) and shrimp (e.g. Urocaridella sp.) are brightly coloured and use distinctive body movements to safely clean predatory fish species, while lycaenid butterfly larvae employ chemical and vibrational signals to persuade ants to protect them instead of eating them. Many species rely on multiple senses to improve communication, and the review suggests that focusing only on obvious visual signals may overlook important ways animals exchange information across species.

Flexible communication

Some signals are stable and predictable, like the head or tail-stand postures of fish seeking cleaning services, while others vary across locations and ecological contexts, such as the dolphin behaviours fishermen interpret as indicators of when to cast their nets.

“In some forms of interspecies cooperation, cues and signals vary depending on the ecological context, the species involved, and whether the signal is inherited or learned,” said senior author Dr van der Wal, a researcher affiliated with UCT’s FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology. “This highlights just how flexible and adaptable interspecies communication can be.”

Evolution of cooperation across species

The review also explores how communication systems between species may evolve. Some signals begin as simple cues, features or behaviours that influence how others respond, even though they did not originally evolve for communication. Over time, these cues can develop into clear signals. Other signals originate as behaviours used in different contexts, such as settling conflicts or caring for young, before being adapted for communication in interspecies cooperation.

“Studying how information flows between species gives us a powerful window into how communication systems originate, change and sometimes coevolve,” said Dr Dunkley.

Collaborative effort

The review paper grew out of an interdisciplinary workshop on interspecies cooperation held in Cambridge in July 2023, where researchers studying a wide variety of systems came together. The paper includes 58 authors spanning multiple disciplines, including anthropology, biology and linguistics, as well as researchers studying animal interspecies cooperation, mixed-species behaviours and systems where humans actively train non-human animals.

Future directions

The review opens new avenues for studying the evolution of communication across species boundaries and the ecological importance of interspecies cooperation. It also highlights the need for broader studies across taxa and more experimental work to understand how signals emerge, persist and shape cooperative behaviour.

“We still have much to learn about how these systems function and evolve,” said Dr van der Wal. “We look forward to future research revealing both these interactions and other forms of interspecies cooperation yet to be discovered.”

Publication details

The research appears in Animal Behaviour under the title: “The ecology and evolution of cues and signals in animal interspecies cooperation.”

 

Access associated media files:
Videos and photographs illustrating the examples of animal interspecies cooperation discussed in the paper are available here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/v2x1tjrt73mq0v1oczzy7/AJJ2xUxvzssN3eZoKFq1UZ8?rlkey=3u84wtj6cuyuophlbom5xuqb0&dl=0  
Please refer to the accompanying Excel file for the appropriate captions and descriptions.

Human-honeyguide cooperation [VIDEO] 

Human honey-hunters (Homo sapiens) can cooperate with greater honeyguides (Indicator indicator) by following their calls and flight to locate hidden bees' nests, then harvesting the honey while leaving behind wax and larvae that the birds feed on. Example footage from Niassa Special Reserve, northern Mozambique.

Credit

Dominic Cram

 

Arabian Sea humpback whale’s long-distance trip further highlights species’ unique ecology



Study documents first direct evidence of an Arabian Sea humpback whale crossing the Arabian Sea, an unusual journey for a species so uniquely adapted to their habitat they represent a behavioral anomaly




Frontiers

Humpback whale 

image: 

Humpback whale off coast

view more 

Credit: Environment Society of Oman/D. MacDonald





Off Oman’s coast lives a small population of just over 80 Arabian Sea humpback whales (ASHWs). They are classified as endangered and thought to be the only humpback whale population that doesn’t undertake seasonal migrations across the world’s oceans. Now, to better understand movement patterns of this population, an international team of researchers has tracked their movements over several years. The results were published in Frontiers in Marine Science.

“We show ASHWs predominantly stayed within a very restricted home range along the coast of Oman,” said first author Dr Andrew Willson, a marine scientist and founding director of Future Seas Global SPC. “Alongside very localized movements, we also document the first long-distance movement of an ASHW across the Arabian Sea, pointing to the possibility of other important habitats within the Arabian Sea.”

Resident whales

Previous studies suggest ASHWs have diverged from southern hemisphere humpback whale populations around 70,000 years ago. Unlike their relatives, ASHWs usually only move within Arabian Sea waters. “This fundamentally challenges our understanding of humpback ecology. At some point in their history, ASWHs successfully adapted to a radical shift in their environment and foraging strategy,” said Willson.

The study used 14 satellite tags that monitored whales’ dives. Tags were deployed at two locations, Hallaniyat Bay and the Gulf of Masirah, and transmitted 53 days on average, sending a total of just over 1,800 locations for all tagged whales. 

“Leading into this study we had so many questions about the daily life of the mysterious humpback whales found in the Arabian Sea, of which we would only get fleeting glimpses during long hot hours of boat surveys,” said Willson. “Tagging these whales allowed us to peel back the lid of the sea and check in online to see where they were each day.”

Of the whales tagged in the Gulf of Masirah, five remained in the area for the time during which tags transmitted locations, and two travelled south to Hallaniyat Bay. All six animals tagged in Hallaniyat Bay, moved between the Gulf of Masirah, Hallaniyat Bay, and northern Yemen. The Gulf of Masirah was the most important habitat for ASHWs, and 57% of locations were transmitted from there, followed by 18% transmitted from Hallaniyat Bay. Accordingly, home and core ranges of ASHWs reflected strong site fidelity between areas less than 400km apart.

Due to monsoons, the western Arabian Sea is one of the most productive upwelling zones globally and can support ASHWs year-round. “We think the movements of the whales in our study relate to their tracking of inshore prey, likely sardines, over the continental shelf. Deeper dives off the continental shelf could be related to searching for other food found in deeper water, such as krill,” explained Willson.

Whale on a trek

Just one female whale known as Luban – named in Arabic for the frankincense-shaped pattern on her tail fluke – significantly deviated from highly localized travel. She traveled east across the Arabian Sea and was detected off the west Indian state of Goa. Luban covered around 7,000km on her return journey. While humpback whale song has previously been connected between Omani and Indian coasts, Luban’s journey provides the first direct evidence of an ASHW crossing the Arabian Sea.

The area where Luban remained off the southern coast of India for up to a month is also known for its high productivity. The team believes that finding food or reproducing – key factors that motivate humpbacks to travel – may have been simultaneous drivers for her journey. Recently, Luban has been spotted again in the Gulf of Masirah. “It’s always a relief when we make resightings of these amazing whales given the limited size of the population,” said Willson.

Adaptation artists

The team hopes their work will help protect a small and isolated population of whales that’s facing impacts from climate change and human activity. Data collected in this study can, for example, help ensure that fishing activities do not impede these animals in their habitat.

“Coastal fishing communities in Oman have revered and respected these whales for many generations,” said Aida Al Jabri, a marine expert supporting the study with the Oman Environment Authority. “For rapidly modernizing societies in this region the study puts these whales more into view. This is critical to supporting their conservation.”

The team pointed out that tracking data alone cannot answer all questions and future vessel surveys are needed to confirm how ASHWs use this habitat and how they respond to climate change and other threats.

“The Arabian Sea provides unique conditions allowing a once-migratory species to completely change its ecology. It’s a testament to how extraordinary the region is,” concluded co-author Suaad Al Harthi, the executive director of the Environment Society of Oman, the local research partner in the project. “We hope their adaptability will help ASHWs in uncertain times when their domain is influenced by accelerated climate change.”

 

Oil palm, coconut and soybean cause more species extinction than thought




ETH Zurich






Oils from crops such as coconut, oil palm and soybean are used in a range of applications, from cosmetics and make-up to margarine and spreads, and from medicines to animal feed. These oil crops, as they are known, are increasingly consumed and cultivated. This has an impact on the environment. But what exactly is that impact? 

A research team led by Stephan Pfister, Professor for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment at ETH Zurich, examined this question. Specifically, the researchers studied the extent to which the increasing cultivation and consumption of oil crops are threatening animal and plant species worldwide. This is the world’s first study looking at this issue.  

“From the perspective of environmental protection, biodiversity loss is as big a problem as climate change,” says Pfister, explaining the motivation behind the study. In it, the researchers analysed global data on production, trade and land use over several decades, combining several models to gauge the influence of oil crops on biodiversity. 

The researchers began by compiling global maps of oil crop cultivation based on satellite data, agricultural statistics and global data sets on cultivated land.  

They also calculated the extent to which different forms of land use threaten animal and plant species. To do so, they used species loss factors, which indicate how much cultivated areas contribute to global species loss – depending on the region and agricultural intensity.  

Three crops are mainly responsible for species extinction 

The researchers also sought to highlight the impact of oil crop cultivation across the global supply chain, explains Pfister. To this end, Pfister and his team linked the already collected data with a global economic model depicting international supply chains – from cultivation via processing to the final product. This illustrates, for example, how soybean from Brazil is fed to animals in China or Europe, thereby ultimately enabling high meat consumption.  

Finally, the team analysed how the factors of consumer behaviour, population growth and agricultural efficiency are contributing to the increase in biodiversity loss.  

The study examined 19 oil crops. “Three of which caused a particularly large share of the impacts: oil palm, soybean and coconut,” says Shuntian Wang, a doctoral student on Pfister’s team. Together, they account for some 75 percent of the biodiversity loss caused by oil crops.  

Consumption as the driver of biodiversity loss 

At the same time, the study highlights a clear development: between 1995 and 2020, biodiversity loss rose by around 80 percent. But this is not primarily caused by global population growth. 

Tropical regions are especially impacted, with agricultural land use causing significant biodiversity loss. This is due not only to the fact that oil crops such as oil palm and coconut are exclusive to these regions but also because they support high biodiversity and typically yield less per unit of land. As a result, there is often a need for agricultural expansion, which can lead to ecosystem destruction, such as deforestation.  

Global demand is driving crop oil production 

These systems are often far away from the demand-side drivers: as the study by Pfister’s team shows, more than half of the impacts are attributable to consumption in other countries. The European Union, China and the United States together account for over 80 percent of these externalised impacts. While the EU mainly imports palm oil, China’s influence is primarily linked to soybean for animal feed. 

Unfortunately, biodiversity loss cannot be halted overnight. The long-term use of agricultural land also puts pressure on ecosystems. “Even if there is no new deforestation, the impact of current agriculture remains,” says Pfister. 

Potential solutions 

To alleviate the existing problems, we need more environmentally friendly production, less deforestation and farming practices that protect the soil and the natural environment. Our consumption also needs to change. However, global markets make it difficult to find simple solutions. Demand can quickly shift to other regions. “An important lever is investing in better production and in the protection of ecosystems in countries of origin,” says Pfister.