Saturday, August 01, 2026

Disease Researchers Blame DOGE Cuts for Spiraling Cyclospora Outbreak


Public health agencies are struggling to mount an effective response with less resources and fewer staff.
July 29, 2026


Protesters rally to demand an end to DOGE’s and the Trump administration’s cuts to funding for science, research, education, and other areas, on April 8, 2025, in New York City.Spencer Platt / Getty Images

As the diarrhea-causing cyclospora parasite continues to spread through the U.S., now having sickened an estimated 11,500 Americans in at least nine states since May, it is becoming increasingly clear that the situation has been massively worsened by the actions of the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) over the past 18 months.

CNN reported last week that cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have created a “perfect storm” in which the outbreak could go from a minor inconvenience to a national public health crisis within a matter of weeks. DOGE cut eight of the 11 jobs at the CDC lab specializing in cyclospora. Meanwhile, the rapid dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which shared facilities and personnel with the State Department and CDC, also led to the loss of many of the experts and labs dealing with exotic diseases stateside, such as cyclospora. Take down USAID — an act that DOGE marketed as being about snuffing out supposedly bloated foreign aid programs — and there’s a guaranteed impact on the CDC and on the health of Americans stateside.

Add in additional cuts to a range of CDC offices, and the result is a disaster in the making.

Dan Jernigan, former director of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, told Truthout that the CDC’s Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria lost much of its funding, as did the CDC’s office for neglected tropical diseases. While those offices didn’t directly fund cyclospora research, many of their scientists had specialty knowledge of parasites such as the one that causes cyclospora — and could be called on to share that knowledge during an outbreak.

DOGE cut eight of the 11 jobs at the CDC lab specializing in cyclospora.

The Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria has “taken a hit because of DOGE[’s] USAID cuts and the hiring freeze [for the CDC],” notes Jernigan. “Because of that, there were fewer people to respond to the cyclospora outbreak when it was first detected.”

Taken as a whole, the result of the assault on USAID and on the CDC is that under-resourced, under-staffed labs are struggling to test all the samples that need to be tested for cyclospora to stop the spread of the parasite and to work out its origins — for while the largest outbreak has been traced to iceberg lettuce from a facility in central Mexico run by produce giant Taylor Farms, multiple cyclospora investigations are also underway for other outbreaks spread by as-yet-unidentified sources.


Musk Says He Got “Carried Away” With DOGE Cuts, Which Are Set to Kill Millions
Research last year found that, by 2030, DOGE cuts could kill 14 million, including 4.5 million children under 5  By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  July 27, 2026


Jernigan, who resigned last year after the Trump administration fired the CDC director, estimates that 73 scientists at the CDC were being funded by USAID dollars before DOGE’s cuts. Today, only 38 of those scientists remain at the agency. Labs that could monitor cyclospora aren’t fully functional; many contractors have lost their government contracts; and so-called Title 42 hires — scientists hired on renewable short-term contracts — have had their appointments lapse.

Seventy-three scientists at the CDC were being funded by USAID dollars before DOGE’s cuts. Today, only 38 of those scientists remain at the agency.

The result is chaos. Put simply, the U.S. government’s top public health agencies are struggling to mount an effective response in the face of emerging biological threats. Indeed, in many instances, the government has simply abandoned the field.

Under Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership, the CDC’s FoodNet partnership with the Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and 10 state health departments no longer mandates the tracking of cyclospora, focusing only on salmonella and E. coli outbreaks. This makes it harder both to identify an outbreak in its early stages and to track its development and push for successful interventions.

In 2025, the federal government slashed $11 billion in funds for state and local public health systems. Not surprisingly, even big states such as California are struggling mightily to plug these funding holes — a situation made worse by explicitly political efforts by the Trump administration to withhold medical and research dollars from blue states as punishment for not toeing the line on immigration and other policies.

A year ago, as I was writing on the DOGE purges for my book American Carnage, one of the fired federal workers whom I spoke with told me that he and his colleagues kept coming back to a single phrase: “Fuck around and find out.” If you cut federal government services to the bone, he explained, eventually the consequences will be extreme. We are seeing that now in the realm of public health: Since Donald Trump got back into power and unleashed DOGE on the federal workforce, the dismantling of public health infrastructure has led to the U.S.’s worst measles outbreak in decades; escalating numbers of whooping cough cases among children; the reemergence, after 60 years in which it had been eliminated, of screwworm within the country’s cattle herds; and now, a cyclospora outbreak that has sent thousands to hospital and that shows no sign of ending anytime soon.


If you cut federal government services to the bone eventually the consequences will be extreme. We are seeing that now in the realm of public health.

Overseas, as I reported for Truthout earlier this year, the CDC monitoring systems that could have detected, early on, the ongoing Ebola outbreak, were largely shuttered — leading to an uncontained outbreak that now impacts many countries in central Africa.

Polio, which since the early 1990s has been almost entirely eliminated globally, is also making a comeback, albeit still of a limited nature, in countries no longer assisted by USAID medical expertise and vaccine distribution. Many of these countries are also receiving less funding from the U.K., which historically has been a huge funder of polio vaccination campaigns but is scaling back its foreign aid commitments in the face of relentless pressure from the Trump administration to divert funds to military spending.

Taken as a whole, these cascading public health crises point to a system that is being bent to the breaking point. On top of that, the Trump administration’s revision of rules for federal grants and increased scrutiny of projects funded by the National Institutes of Health makes it extraordinarily hard for universities and research teams to staff their laboratories. Without a steady stream of grants, “we essentially have to turn the lights off,” Sarah Ewald, associate professor of immunology, microbiology, and cancer biology at the University of Virginia, explained to Truthout. “There’ve just been massive delays in terms of funding for basic research.” As a result, it has become harder for clinicians and researchers to work out the “frequency of disease incidences and whether they’re reaching outbreak levels.”

Making a bad situation worse, disease outbreaks are taking place in the months after the Trump administration succeeded in convincing the GOP majority in Congress not to vote to extend Affordable Care Act (ACA) credits, leading to more than 2.6 million people losing their ACA health insurance coverage. In consequence, cyclospora victims who have lost insurance now may need to fall back on visits to the emergency room for treatment.

By any measure, all of this is an extraordinarily expensive and ineffective way for the world’s richest nation to deal with a foodborne disease outbreak. Trump and RFK Jr. promised to “make America healthy again.” They are, it is now clear, falling woefully short in realizing this promise.
Elon Musk’s Super PAC Plans to Spend Up to $120 Million in Midterm Races

The spending will likely target “get out the vote” efforts for Republican candidates in multiple House and Senate races.

July 31, 2026

Tech billionaire Elon Musk at a meeting during a visit to China.Johannes Neudecker/picture alliance via Getty Images

Multibillionaire Elon Musk has authorized his super political action committee (PAC) to spend millions of dollars in this year’s midterm races, continuing a trend of huge investments seen in two recent election cycles.

Musk’s America PAC will spend between $100 million to $120 million in the next few months, focusing on Senate and House races across the U.S. The PAC will initially target races in Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, and Ohio, and is reportedly discussing possibly entering races in North Carolina, Georgia, Texas, California, Wisconsin, and Washington.

It’s expected that Musk will not have a front-facing role in these campaigns, a departure from his participation in the 2024 presidential election and a 2025 race in Wisconsin featuring a statewide Supreme Court contest. In both of those races, Musk was a featured player, frequently appearing on the campaign trail.

Musk was instrumental in helping Trump win the presidential election. But in 2025, after a heavy investment in the Wisconsin race resulted in an embarrassing loss for the billionaire, he said he would be doing “a lot less” political spending in the future.

According to reporting from Axios, the spending from Musk’s super PAC is meant to have a specific focus: to “boost Republican voter turnout” in the elections, the publication said. America PAC will prioritize knocking on doors, digital ads, and direct mailers that seek to bring more conservative voters to the polls.


Elon Musk Celebrated Imminent Trillionaire Status by Stoking Pogroms in Belfast
Dozens of people have been burned out of their homes after Musk used X to incite anti-immigrant mobs in Ireland. By Sasha Abramsky , Truthout  June 16, 2026


The “get out the vote” priority could be helpful to Republicans, given the enormous enthusiasm gap between them and Democratic-leaning voters in this year’s races. A recent poll from Data for Progress also shows that efforts to “convert” swing voters may be difficult — among that group of people, 33 percent say they are already leaning toward backing Democratic options, versus 21 percent who say they are closer to supporting Republican ones.

Musk — the world’s richest person who currently has a net worth of around $700 billion — was a regularly seen personality in the previous campaigns he invested in, but his decision to play a more muted role this year may be due in part to recent findings from election officials in Wisconsin.

As part of his campaign to support the conservative candidate in the Wisconsin Supreme Court case in 2025, Musk handed out $100 checks to voters who signed a petition promising to oppose so-called “activist judges.” He also gave out three checks to voters in the state for $1 million, as part of a “lottery” to encourage people to sign the petition and to vote in that year’s spring race.

Earlier this month, the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) deemed those actions as likely in violation of state law. “Any person who…offers, gives, lends or promises to give or lend, or endeavors to procure, anything of value, or any office or employment or any privilege or immunity to, or for, any elector, or to or for any other person, in order to induce any elector to vote or refrain from voting” is guilty of a Class I felony, the statutes stipulate.

Even though Musk didn’t directly say the checks were contingent on which candidate voters backed, he still likely broke state law by incentivizing people to vote at all. If eventually charged and found guilty, Musk could be fined up to $10,000 and/or imprisoned up to 3.5 years.

The WEC forwarded its recommendations to Brown County District Attorney David Lasee, a Republican, who has yet to decide whether he’ll seek charges.
Iowa Republican's 'humble' façade crumbles under extravagant mansions and a private jet


GOP gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn (YouTube Sceenshot)

July 31, 2026
ALTERNET

GOP gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn’s humble and ‘homespun’ campaign in Iowa may be collapsing under revelations shared with the Daily Mail.

“Is [this] really his home?” writes Daily Mail U.S. News reporter Alyssa Guzman. “As the wealthy businessman faces growing questions over where he spends the majority of his time, the Daily Mail can exclusively reveal that he has offloaded ritzy properties in Kansas and Montana during the run up to November's vote.”

The Mail reports Lahn -- who calls his Democratic opponent "one of the wealthiest people running for office right now," -- has carefully cultivated his image as a 'sixth-generation farmer' dedicated to a humble, rural life in Iowa. Lahn's website depicts him and his wife, Annie Lahn, and their blended family of seven kids roaming scenic fields of corn. The site also carries footage of Lahn driving around his small hometown where he served as high school quarterback of his football team and helped his family farm.


Lahn claims he had to leave the state, but returned in 2014 after buying back his great-grandmother's farm.

“Everything I needed was right here,' he says in his campaign video. 'By night, me and Annie sanded floors, hung drywall, and put this place back together one board at a time.”


“But Lahn was still legally married to his ex-wife, Lauren, until June 2020, and a closer look at his background reveals an altogether messier picture,” reports the Mail. “Lahn's new wife, Annie, was married to Chase Koch, the son of his ex-boss, the billionaire Charles Koch until they divorced in April 2020. Lahn and Annie applied for a Montana marriage license just 11 days after his own divorce was finalized.”

And the Mail reports there are new doubts over the amount of time Lahn spends in the state he wants to lead, with flight records suggesting he spends the majority of his time hundreds of miles away in Kansas.

“It appears Lahn uses a private plane to shuttle to and from the family's $1.2 million six-bedroom estate in Wichita, Kansas. He appears to have begun flying to Belle Plaine more frequently after launching his campaign,” reports Guzman. “Aircraft data suggests Lahn spends only about 20 percent of his time on the Iowa farm, located near Buckeye Creek, that features in his promotional material.”


Lahn’s Kansas property — not featured on his website — has an indoor pool and access to a private pond. The family had owned it since the summer of 2024, when it was listed as his new wife’s primary residence. But in 2025, the Daily Mail reports it was offloaded to one of Lahn's donors — for a single dollar.

Also, in 2025, just before launching his November campaign, Lahn sold off “a gorgeous Montana ski mansion for $5 million,” according to records.

“Had he declared the state as his primary residence just a few weeks later, Lahn would have been ineligible for governor in 2026, as the state constitution requires two years of residency to run,” reports the Mail. “… Lahn was a registered Republican in Kansas from 2018 to 2024, records showed.


Despite Lahn claiming he is 'not a politician,' the Mail also reports he worked as a political operative for Montana Sen. Steve Daines and the former Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner and others. And he worked for many years for Koch's Americans for Prosperity, “where he spent his time as state director trying to block Montana's expansion of Medicaid.”
Nothing can tear Trump’s MAGA fans from him — even domestic violence: poll


President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump on April 21, 2025 (Joey Sussman/Shutterstock.com)

July 30, 2026
ALTERNET

President Donald Trump once famously bragged that his supporters love him so much that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and they wouldn't abandon him. And a new Politico poll reveals that his most ardent supporters still aren't faltering.

Regardless of his scandals, the top MAGA voters are still behind him. Where Trump appears to be losing ground is with non-MAGA Republicans and Independent voters. Previous reports show that Trump is losing ground with some MAGA supporters who felt they were "lied to" by the president.

Now, that loyalty is stretching across to other Republican candidates, with voters saying they don't care what a candidate does; they'll continue to support the Republican.

GOP candidates "confronted with an array of scandals, from a DUI conviction or accepting lobbyist gifts to more serious accusations including domestic violence, sexual assault and antisemitic social media posts" still maintain support among MAGA.

"Two-thirds of self-identified MAGA Trump voters say they would continue supporting a GOP candidate accused of sexual assault — 13 percentage points higher than the share of Trump 2024 voters writ large, which include those who do not identify as MAGA. By comparison, 40 percent of voters who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 would continue backing a Democratic candidate accused of sexual assault," said Politico.

The numbers show that the worst possible issue among MAGA voters would be if Trump shared classified information with a foreign government. Just 57 percent of his supporters said they'd continue to support him. Antisemitic statements weren't much of a concern either, with 58 percent saying they'd still support him. Being accused of sexual assault and selling misleading medical treatments wouldn't phase 66 percent of MAGA fans who said they'd continue to support Trump

If Trump lied about a terminal illness 69 percent of MAGA would stick with him. Everything else over 70 percent of his supporters said didn't matter to them: things like whether he was convicted of a DUI, domestic violence, taking gifts from lobbyists, bullying in the workplace and even wearing blackface.

"Scandal doesn’t mean what it did 15 years ago. The rules have changed, and Republican voters know it," longtime Republican strategist Ford O’Connell told Politico. “Republicans, particularly MAGA voters, have learned that Queensberry rules don’t win in modern politics. Today it’s a full-contact fight, more UFC than civics class, and anything goes.”
Brutal CNN supercut lays bare Trump team's 'brazen lies' — that just blew up in court


Washington DC, United States, February 27, 2026 - Trump and Karoline Leavitt depart the White House to go to Corpus Christi

Elizabeth Preza 
August 01, 2026
ALTERNET

A CNN supercut on Saturday exposed the lengths the Trump administration went to bolster false claims that “vandals” sabotaged the Reflecting Pool in Washington D.C., after the Department of Justice on Friday admitted damage to the memorial was likely caused by “a rushed and botched installation by AIC, the primary contractor.”

Trump and his team for months have touted renovations at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, which the president claimed in April was “decaying.” In May, the Trump administration granted a “no-bid” contract to renovate the pool as administration officials made it clear Trump wanted the color of the liner “changed for the country’s birthday party on July 4,” the New York Times reported. The president called the color “American flag blue.” At a small business summit in May, Trump described the new liner as “very strong … if you had a knife, you can’t even cut it, it’s so strong, so powerful, it’s like powerful rubber. It is beautiful. Sealed.”

“The cost to repaint the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool ... ballooned to more than $14.65 million,” ABC News reported in June.

Following the restoration, algae and liner issues plagued the pool, prompting the president to make various unsubstantiated claims that the memorial was “damaged by deranged vandals” who cut increasingly large “slashes” into the liner with a “box cutter or knife.”

In mid July, the pool was drained once again ”to fix the scars and damage that was done by the vandals,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Olympian David Hearn was among those accused by the Trump administration of sabotaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn was “indicted July 2 on one count of felony destruction of property” after “U.S. Park Police alleged Hearn grabbed and tugged at a loose section of the pool’s coating on June 19, continuing after a National Park Service employee told him to stop,” Fox News reports.

In an interview, Hearn “acknowledged immersing his hand and touching the peeling sealant during a pause in a bike ride, but ... said that is all he did,” according to the Times.

Lawyers for Hearn called the charges “outrageous,” adding they “should be alarming to every American.”

The president and his team’s numerous false claims were rehashed on CNN This Morning Saturday as the network rolled the tape on their efforts to blame the Reflecting Pool's problems on vandals.

“Somebody went in with a knife and cut it. They cut it up good,” Trump said to reporters on June 23.

“I think 209,300 foot lit right through it, slit, right through it. Probably a box cutter or a knife of some kind,” Trump said in a separate Oval Office interview. “At the right time you’ll see it, You'll see it. You'll see it in court.”

At a June 22 press conference, Trump Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt blamed the damage on “deranged individuals, many of them longtime donors to the Democrat party, to Barack Obama."

“He damaged this pool,” U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro forcefully declared at a July 2 press conference regarding Hearn’s arrest. Asked for evidence of damage during that presser, Pirro told a reporter, “Well, when I file a charge, I'll be happy to show you a picture. All right.”

On Friday, Pirro moved to dismiss the charges against Hearn.

In a court filing, the Department of Justice said new evidence “significantly [undermines] the evidentiary basis for the indictment” and laid blame for the false allegation at the hands of the Department of Interior (DOI).

“Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment,” Pirro wrote in a motion to dismiss the charges. “DOI’s failure to fully and accurately provide information to USAODC undermined the government’s ability to abide by these responsibilities.”

CNN rolls tape of Trump energy secretary appearing to lie to Congress


US Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright testifies before the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 7, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo

July 31, 2026 
ALTERNET

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright may have lied to Congress about the role politics played in cancelling energy grants to Democratic states, according to a CNN supercut that aired Friday.

CNN’s Victor Blackwell rolled the tape after lawyers for the Trump administration admitted in a July 15 court filing that “the inclusion of grants in the October notice was based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient state, i.e., whether the recipients location was in a blue state or a non blue state.”

“But that is not what the energy secretary said to Congress a few months ago,” Blackwell noted.

The host then played a clip of Wright speaking with the House Appropriations Committee. In that April 15 meeting, Wright insisted “our project review process did not take into account any politics in the evaluation of these projects.”

Rep. Rosa Delauro (D-CT) took immediate issue with Wright’s claim during that hearing, telling the energy secretary “the district court this January found that this violated the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.”

Republican strategist Melik Abdul was quick to condemn the Trump administration for politicizing aid.

“This is just unacceptable,” Abdul said. “And I think the White House knows this. I was actually surprised that it's something that they owned up to. I guess maybe they didn't have a choice since it was in court, they really didn't have a choice. But this is something that no one should support at all.”

Abdul went on to shame the administration for “doing it for political reasons and admitting you're doing it for political reasons.”

“I just don't know how you can defend it,” Abdul added.

Former federal prosecutor Elliot Williams agreed, noting that while the Trump administration “had no choice” but to admit to the political nature of their grant decisions “because they were in court … they are [also] shameless about their behavior.”

“And I think you've seen the president in the White House just acting with impunity on things like this, thinking that it's politically popular with their base and that they can string things out in the courts long enough and just to make it go away,” Williams added.

The former federal prosecutor noted if Democrats take the House of Representatives in the fall, “this is precisely the kind of thing that would get congressional oversight in the form of hearings or letters or investigations or whatever else.”

“I also think just the big one that dogs the Trump administration and so many things is process,” Williams added. "Did they properly follow the process that the law lays out in canceling grants? And they can be sued over that as well. And so we have not seen the end of this story in the courts. But like so many other things, the political question, as much as it's a legal one.”


Security experts: Trump is hiding the real culprit in major US cyberattack


U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during a working session with G7 leaders and outreach partners on international investment partnerships at the G7 summit in Evian-les-Bains, France, June 16, 2026. REUTERS
July 31, 2026
ALTERNET

CNN cybersecurity reporter Sean Lyngaas says President Donald Trump is desperate to blame a recent cyberattack on 30 Minnesota water systems on the state government and Democrats. But Trump can probably thank his own government cuts for the nation's growing system vulnerabilities.

“I don't know, I think Minnesota is behind it. You know who's behind it? Minnesota, because they're grossly incompetent. I think the governor is behind it. I don't think there was an Iranian cyberattack. I think that Minnesota ought to get its act together,” Trump said a recent cabinet meeting.

Nope. That’s not the case, said Lyngaas.

“It was not [Minnesota Gov.] Tim Walz who did this,” said Lyngass patiently. “Our reporting shows that Iran is a suspect. U.S. officials haven't nailed it down with certainty, but given the geopolitical environment we're in [It’s very likely.]”

Trump’s flailing foreign strategy is becoming more and more evident as his so-called “short-term excursion” drags into its sixth month. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth claims the war has so far cost $37.5 billion but a Telegraph analysis puts the "true bill" at $151.3 billion.


“The president seems to think it is the [governor],” pointed out a CNN anchor. “Just so we can rule everything out. Is Minnesota even on their list of possibilities?”

“It's not. They're not blaming Minnesota,” repeated Lyngaas flatly. “They're trying to help Minnesota. And I spoke with the top cyber official in Minnesota earlier this week. And he told me that he really wants to raise awareness. They were sort of the first victim. But there are a number of victims in other states. People like to focus understandably on who did it, which matters, of course, for the politics. But in terms of recovering from it and making sure there's no ill effects, that doesn't really matter if you're trying to just get things back online.”

But Lyngaas added that Trump is the only recent president striving to undermine the federal government’s strength against cyberattacks.


“I've covered election security since the 2016 with the Russian influence campaign. And we first saw this big increase in [federal] staffing after that and a focus from the Department of Homeland Security in helping support election officials. That was actually under Trump’s … first administration, and they won bipartisan praise for that,” said Lyngaas. “But since he returned to power, Trump has fired a lot of those experts. And what we're seeing now is with less than 100 days to the midterms, when election season is already in full swing and it's kind of too late to take a lot of federal support because election officials have their plans in place. Now, the Trump administration is saying, ‘let's try to essentially fix what we broke.’”

“Obviously, they wouldn't phrase it like that, but that's a way that a lot of credible folks in the community see it,” Lyngaas added. “They're unveiling this plan that follows up on Trump's speech from the other day, … to basically say, ‘we're here to support you. We want to build trust.’ The problem is that is that trust has been shattered by the last several months.”

OPINION

Desperately Seeking Scapegoats


Forbearance, thy name is: Fauci at latest Senate hearing
Photo by Matthew Kaminsky/EPA

Abby Zimet
Jul 30, 2026
COMMON DREAMS
Further


Killing The Messenger Dept: Somehow going still lower, Republicans - aka “you absolute fucking pieces of shit” - just hauled Dr. Anthony Fauci into a Senate hearing to charge the guy who saved three million lives with “sabotaging” a dog heartworm pill, wanting to be a megalomanic “sun god,” destroying “Americans’ trust in their government” and probs being “responsible for this entire pandemic.” In response, Fauci, “the man they cannot forgive for being right,” declined to answer any of their “questions.”

Wednesday’s Stalinist circus shitshow trial from a GOP so desperately bogged down they’ve resorted to, “Ok, but remember the pandemic?” - and forget the Epstein files - offered dismal proof they’re still mindlessly bowdlerizing science and using Fauci - a Cornell-trained, 85-year-old immunologist and infectious disease specialist who spent over 50 years in public service - as its main punching bag. Fauci, who evil bridge troll Steve Bannon once said should be beheaded, served almost 40 years as head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Niaid) under 7 presidents. Reagan hired him, George H. W. Bush cited him when asked to name someone he admired, George W. gave him a Presidential Medal of Freedom and asked him to design a wildly successful AIDS relief PEPFAR that saved 25 million lives, most poor people in Africa.


You Sirs Are the Duplicitous Murderous Failures

In the 1980s, HIV/AIDS was one of multiple public health crises largely afflicting marginalized populations, along with Ebola and a first coronavirus, that Fauci confronted with grace and courage. “AIDS arrived attached to a despised population,” notes one observer. “Fauci did not look away.” He redirected research toward what was then deemed a plague “when it was neither safe nor popular,” and when furious, screaming, ill AIDS activists stormed his office, he invited them in, listened to them, decided they were at least partly right and expedited clinical trials so patients could get quicker access to experimental drugs. Fierce AIDS activist Larry Kramer, who once called Fauci “an incompetent murderer,” years later called him “the only true and great hero” among government officials of the time.

This week’s hearing, called and convened under subpoena by rabid gadfly and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, was billed as an investigation into the origins of COVID, a legit scientific question that to some extent remains unresolved. For years, MAGA has chosen to blame an accidental “lab leak” from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, and Paul has devoted much of his otherwise less-than-memorable political career to arguing, according to that theory, that Dr. Fauci “could be responsible for this entire pandemic” - because NIH once provided the Institute with a sub-grant. Most virologists and other health experts say it was more likely caused by the occasional “spillover event” of a virus jumping from an infected animal to a human, arguing the “preponderance” of evidence points to that natural origin.

Public health officials have stepped up to protest the government’s “vilification and harassment” of American scientists,“ and a group of 155 scientists wrote an open letter dismissing bizarre MAGA charges against Fauci - he covered up the origins of his own research, bribed or others to join him, holds patents on vaccines, is working with bad actors to suppress the awful truth - as ”baseless...No credible evidence has been produced to support these absurd charges.“ Still, Paul’s office spent last weekend dumping over 1,100 pages of Fauci’s private ”diary“ online; after blowback, they took them down, made redactions and reposted them. Inadvertently or no, they left in Fauci’s various descriptions of Trump as ”rambling,“ ”crazy,“ ”bumbling,“ ”incompetent,“ ”an idiot“ and ”truly an obnoxious adolescent.“

In a somber preamble, Fauci noted over the decades he has testified before Congress, willingly and under oath, hundreds of times. But because he “has spent years playing Twister with these sinuous assholes (and) he knows it doesn’t matter what the spinner says,” he went on, “Though it pains me to do so because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government,” following counsel’s advice he would invoke the Fifth and “refrain from answering your questions.” He also blasted Paul’s “unhinged obsession” with him. Then, dozens of times over the infuriating hours, he intoned, “I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.” Later, an expert noted his carefully neutral body language during the ordeal: “He is refusing to participate in the confrontation beyond what is legally required.”

Paul - the only senator to vote against $8.3 billion in emergency spending during COVID, and the first senator to get it - grew agitated by Fauci’s calm stream of refusals. He threatened him with “repercussions” and with a charge of contempt. Heatedly refusing to allow any of Fauci’s attorneys to join him - “The attorneys were not recognized,” he snarled - at one point he called on security to escort out of the hearing room one lawyer after he attempted to speak with Fauci. “This is the way Anthony Fauci wants to be remembered - for a lawyer not recognizing the rules,” he said. “Security, please remove him from the room.” The attorney gently patted Fauci on the shoulder and turned to leave on his own; a guard sheepishly trailed after him. In the audience, Laura Ingraham and other MAGA-ites applauded, because they have no shame and never will.

Rand and other Republicans tried to claim Fauci had no right to take the Fifth because Biden issued him a preemptive pardon that eliminated that privilege, an ongoing debate in some legal circles. What is not debated though Repubs tried to argue otherwise: Invoking the Fifth Amendment is not a confession of guilt, but a foundational right against self-incrimination as long as there exists a valid threat of prosecution. Most pointedly, the Fifth does not represent guilt but “the ordinary caution” of any citizen who is dragged before a hostile panel by a vindictive chairman vowing for years to put him behind bars, and who “understands this hearing was ”never a search for information but a search for a crime - of having stood in public and told a frightened country the truth, while a president lied to it.“

Public health experts now say roughly 40% of America’s million-plus COVID deaths, representing hundreds of thousands of lives, could have been prevented under more effective federal policies. But because they were caused by an idiotic malignant narcissist tragically unable to admit he’s ever fucked up - or to allow anyone around him to admit it - the lies keep spewing. Last year the White House published a paper on the lab-leak theory as a rationale to defund the NIH, justify cutting over a billion dollars in state and local health funding, and gut cancer and Alzheimers research; now, citing that lame lie and dreaded diversity, they’re trying to put the entire $1 trillion federal grant apparatus under the control of political appointees. This week, in honor of Paul’s hearing, Trump wrote Dr. Fauci’s ideas were “CRAZY.”

On Wednesday, MAGA dutifully jumped in. Cowardly slimebag Josh Hawley, who fist-pumped then ran away from the mob who smeared shit on the Capitol walls, said Fauci had no right to invoke the Fifth, “This is about contempt for this body and the American people,” and, yuge pot/kettle, the good doctor was a lying megalomaniac who “wanted to be the sun god.” Bernie Moreno demanded Fauci apologize for his crimes and sneered, “Who the fuck did you think you were?” Roger Marshall, an alleged doctor, said vaccine lies “made Americans not trust their government,” though unvaxxed MAGA died at twice the rate of Dems. Ron Johnson called a vaccine that saved millions of lives “an experimental gene therapy, and accused Fauci of lying in his own diary, eliciting the day’s only smile from him.

Later, a frustrated Paul told reporters he would hold Fauci in contempt, though it’s not up to him. Besides, notes Tom Wellborn, the spectacle wasn’t really about answers to questions; it was about a mob of willfully ignorant quacks and losers finding an imaginary villain. “Fauci was the man on the screen,” he writes. “He absorbed the rage that had nowhere else to go.” Above all, Fauci was hated, not for lying, but for “telling the truth to people who did not want to hear it.” He “stood between the American public and a president who wanted the problem to vanish before an election,” who suggested insane things - Ivermectin, disinfectant, lights - as Fauci carefully contradicted him, “trying to keep his job long enough to keep being useful.”

Fauci wasn’t a saint, Wellborn writes, and he wasn’t right about everything. But he was “right about the things that mattered most” - it was airborne, masks and distance helped. He “told the truth as the science understood it at the time, and when the science changed, as science does, he changed the guidance, and his enemies have spent years calling those updates lies.” Meanwhile, “he saved lives, and they were on the other side.” Most vital: To remember “that in the summer of 2026, a man who had given his entire adult life to keeping other people alive was hauled before a hostile Senate by a colleague nursing a personal vendetta... and which of the two men in that room had spent his life saving strangers, and which spent his trying to jail the person who did.”

“As some day it may happen/that a victim must be found” - Gilbert and Sullivan’s I’ve Got A Little List



Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Abby Zimet
Abby Zimet has written CD's Further column since 2008. A longtime, award-winning journalist, she moved to the Maine woods in the early 70s, where she spent a dozen years building a house, hauling water and writing before moving to Portland. Having come of political age during the Vietnam War, she has long been involved in women's, labor, anti-war, social justice and refugee rights issues. Email: azimet18@gmail.com
Full Bio >

‘An Illegal Gambling Operation’: Online Prediction Market Kalshi Sued by New York


“No matter what they call themselves, prediction markets like Kalshi are gambling platforms, plain and simple,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James.


In this photo illustration, the Kalshi logo is seen displayed on a smartphone screen.
(Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Jul 31, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The state of New York on Friday announced it was suing online prediction market Kalshi for operating as “an illegal gambling operation.”

In a complaint filed with the New York State Supreme Court, New York Attorney General Letitia James alleged that Kalshi was running an unlicensed gambling business “in flagrant disregard” of the Empire State’s “constitution, penal laws, and other statutes.”



Coalition Rejects Trump Admin Push to Let Kalshi, Polymarket ‘Bypass State Gambling Regimes’



Sports Betting Giants Join Unprecedented Corporate Efforts to Buy 2026 Midterms

The complaint notes that, among other things, Kalshi allows users as young as 18 years old to place bets on its platform, while New York state law limits legalized gambling to persons aged 21 or older.

“New York’s gambling laws protect children from underage betting and help combat gambling addiction,” said James in her announcement of the lawsuit. “No matter what they call themselves, prediction markets like Kalshi are gambling platforms, plain and simple. By ignoring our laws, Kalshi is running an illegal operation and harming New Yorkers in the process. We are taking them to court to uphold our laws and protect New Yorkers.”

James’ lawsuit asks the court to permanently bar Kalshi from operating inside the state unless it obtains a license from the New York State Gaming Commission; ordering it to “produce an accounting of all bets placed, monies lost by customers in connection with its gambling business”; and forcing it to pay assorted “restitution, disgorgement, damages, and penalties” for its assorted violations of the law.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, in a statement supporting the lawsuit against Kalshi, accused the company of ignoring state gambling laws, “which exist to protect consumers, prevent problematic gambling, deliver funding for critical public services, and ensure that every company plays by the same rules.”

Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B), who earlier this year authored legislation to ban prediction markets in her state, said that teenagers getting hooked on gambling apps is becoming a major problem.

“We’re seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds,” said Greenman, “and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger.”

President Donald Trump’s administration, however, has regularly worked to quash state governments’ efforts to regulate online prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.

Specifically, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with prediction market and sports betting industry insiders who have been pursuing legal action against any states attempting to clamp down on the online gambling platforms.

Earlier this year, CFTC Chair Michael Selig warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would “circumvent the clear directive of Congress.”

“Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others,” said Selig. “If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you.”
Nearly 6 in 10 Pennsylvanians Say They’d Vote for ‘Someone Else’ Over Fetterman in 2028

“Saw a rat on the rails at Tasker-Morris and it has my vote.”



US Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) listens as former National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Anthony Fauci testifies at a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on July 29, 2026, in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Jul 31, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Pennsylvanians aren’t just sick of Sen. John Fetterman. Nearly 6 in 10 say that if he came up for reelection today, they’d sooner check the box for literally anybody else.

That’s according to a PennLive/Bravo Group poll released Wednesday, in which just 40% of likely voters in Pennsylvania said they’d vote for their Democratic senator, compared with 58% who said they’d choose an unspecified “someone else.”


‘What Region of Pennsylvania Is Israel Located In?’: Fetterman Jeered for Threat to Quit Dems

While he was elected in 2022 as a progressive in the mold of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Fetterman’s transition into a left-punching Fox News talking head over the past four years has made him abysmally unpopular within his own party.



After watching Fetterman enthusiastically cheer Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, block efforts to halt President Donald Trump’s illegal wars in Venezuela and Iran, defend the honor of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as agents killed several US citizens and immigrants, and mock the idea of lowering Americans’ healthcare costs, just 19% of Democrats in his home state said they approved of him compared to 69% who disapproved, according to a Quinnipiac poll released earlier this month.

Republicans, meanwhile, are loving him: 77% said they approve of how he’s handling his job.

Fetterman is now publicly flirting with a party switch, citing the rising number of Democrats who have voted to restrict arms to Israel as the primary reason.

“If our party ever becomes, and just makes it official, the anti-Israel party, that’s when I would leave because that’s been a moral clarity for me,” Fetterman said earlier this month. “That’s our special ally, you know?”

But Fetterman’s pariah status among Democrats doesn’t mean he can be easily cast out.

With the strong possibility that Democrats could hold a narrow Senate majority after November’s midterms, Fetterman is setting himself up to be de facto king of the Senate with the power to near-singlehandedly dictate policy in the vein of the conservative former Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) during the Biden years.



Fearing the party’s resident “ogre,” as US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed recently called him, may break ranks in the next Congress, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has spent the week trying to make nice. As Semafor reported on Friday:
Chuck Schumer showered John Fetterman with praise this week, declaring him a “very good member,” liked and respected by colleagues in Democrats’ “big tent party.”

Fetterman was grateful for the shoutout and has repeatedly shot down the idea he’d switch caucuses in the Senate. But he’s still not sure he fits with where his party is going.

“I truly appreciate the leader’s nice words,” Fetterman told Semafor on Thursday. He added that “I don’t know if the Democratic Party is ‘big tent’ enough for proud, pro-Israel supporters that also strongly reject the warped mutation of” democratic socialists now rising in their ranks.

Fetterman, who has long struggled with his mental and physical health and expressed apathy about fulfilling basic senatorial tasks like showing up to votes and committee hearings, has not yet committed to running for reelection in 2028.

Even if he did, it’s hard to imagine him faring well in a Democratic primary where most voters would sooner vote for a rat they saw crawling through a SEPTA station, as one social media user put it.

An effort by progressive groups to “primary Fetterman” is already underway, and as the left swaggers from recent victories over the establishment, names like the Berniecrat Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) are being bandied about as possible replacements.

And despite his current status as a GOP darling, it’s unclear if they’d choose a turncoat over the genuine article. While his foreign policy record would make Dick Cheney blush, Fetterman has not yet gone full-MAGA on some load-bearing issues like LGBTQ+ rights and gutting social programs.

Having immolated any goodwill on the left, Fetterman appears to lack a clear constituency.

Meanwhile, according to the new poll, those who want him gone really want him gone: 30% of Pennsylvanians surveyed said they’d “definitely” vote for someone else and 29% said they’d “probably” vote for someone else. By comparison, just 12% said they’d “definitely” vote for Fetterman again, while 28% said they “probably” would.

Isi Breen, a former communications official for Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), remarked on social media, “I literally have never seen an elected official losing so badly to ‘literally anyone else.’”

Resigned Fetterman takes long pause when hit with tough question on CNN


Nicole Charky-Chami
July 31, 2026 
RAW STORY


CNN anchor Kasie Hunt pushed Sen. John Fetterman to respond to questions about his re-election and party alliance on Friday. (CNN/Screenshot)

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) appeared annoyed Friday when CNN anchor Kasie Hunt asked him if he was still planning to run for re-election.

The question prompted a long pause from Fetterman, who got defensive with Hunt during the live broadcast.

"I've already filed, I'm fundraising for it," Fetterman said.

"If you look at my campaign, I've already, you know, essentially announced that now, but it's like, why do people keep asking? Why aren't you — get other senators on here and ask them too," he said.

Hunt responded, alluding to how the Democratic senator has at times sided with Republicans and been questioned over his party loyalty.

"You're just in a very unique and interesting position," Hunt said, pointing to his recent establishment of Common Ground PA, a rare bipartisan fundraising effort.

"You just opened a PAC with Dave McCormick (R-PA), the Republican fellow senator from Pennsylvania," Hunt pointed out. "But of course, a Republican. It's very unusual in this political climate. What are you planning on using that joint PAC for?"

Fetterman defended the move and pushed back at Hunt's question, citing the lawmakers' shared interest in the agriculture industry.

"Why is it bizarre when there are plenty of donors that have enough shared interest?" Fetterman asked. "There's a lot of things that Dave McCormick and I are going to work together, you know, and then so I'm not sure why that's really an issue."

With midterms looming, Fetterman vowed he will "never" switch parties.

"It's not some sinister thing," Fetterman added. "I'm not changing my party. If I was going to change this party, I would have done that by now."