Sunday, July 26, 2026

Native fine-flavor cacao can match commercial varieties in yield, study finds






The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture
Native fine-flavor cacao can match commercial varieties in yield 

image: 

The study was conducted over a three-year period on 12 cacao farms in Peru's Piura region.

view more 

Credit: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT





Piura, Peru, July 21, 2026. A study carried out on smallholder farms in northern Peru shows that Blanco de Piura, a native fine-flavor cacao variety, can achieve productivity levels comparable to those of commercial varieties widely grown across Latin America. 

The research, led by the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT and the University of Göttingen in collaboration with Cooperativa Agraria Norandino, shows that Blanco de Piura—renowned for its exceptional flavor and aroma—can produce an average of between 1,200 and 1,500 kilograms of dry beans per hectare. Achieving such high productivity, however, depends on good tree management. 

Under smallholder farming conditions, these yields match—and in some cases exceed—those of commercial clones widely cultivated across Latin America, such as CCN-51, which have long dominated the market because of their reputation for high productivity. 

Although fine-flavor cacao accounts for about 12% of the global market, 90% of it is produced in Latin America. Buyers pay premium prices for its sensory attributes, yet native fine-flavor cacao has long been regarded as low yielding. The study's findings show that this is not always the case. 

For decades, farmers have faced pressure to replace their native varieties with commercial hybrids because of the belief that native cacao was less productive. This project's finding is particularly significant because it demonstrates that, by selecting highly productive plant material already present in farmers' fields, yields can reach economically viable levels while conserving the region's agrobiodiversity. 

  

Other key findings 

The study was conducted over a three-year period on 12 cacao farms in Peru's Piura region, all owned by members of Cooperativa Agraria Norandino. Researchers evaluated different clones, planting arrangements, and levels of agronomic management to determine their effects on crop productivity. 

The study showed that renewing the canopies of mature trees through grafting with selected native plant material increased production by 59% in just three years, regardless of the clonal arrangement, improving production more rapidly than establishing a new plantation. The greatest impact, however, came from good agronomic practices: farms that pruned twice a year and managed the crop more frequently achieved yields 118% higher than farms with lower levels of management. 

"We confirmed that certain Blanco de Piura cacao genotypes can self-pollinate, which facilitates their planting and ensures production in the field, contrary to what was previously believed," said researcher Carolina Ocampo Ariza, one of the study's authors. 

The researchers also found that, on farms with less intensive management, polyclonal planting designs acted as a form of "insurance" that compensated for a lack of pruning, while designs using a single clone or genotype reached their highest productive potential when combined with intensive agronomic management. 

"The findings show that farmers do not have to choose between conserving agrobiodiversity and improving their incomes. When selected native plant material and good management practices are used, both goals can be achieved simultaneously, making this an economically viable strategy," said Evert Thomas, also an author of the study. 

At these production levels, Peruvian farmers gain a dual competitive advantage: the high volume needed for profitability and the premium prices paid in international markets for the unique sensory quality of Blanco de Piura cacao. 

"These results strongly support the work we have been carrying out at Cooperativa Agraria Norandino to improve our farmers' livelihoods by increasing productivity. We are currently scaling up the use of Blanco de Piura cacao clones on farmers' farms. Today, many of them produce around 500 kilograms per hectare, but the study shows that, with a well-managed plantation and the use of these materials, yields can increase significantly, even reaching 2,000 kilograms per hectare. This is a very important step toward further strengthening a cacao that is already internationally recognized for its sensory quality and now also demonstrates its enormous productive potential," said Eduardo Espinoza, Cocoa Value Chain Manager at Cooperativa Agraria Norandino. 

This scientific advance is essential to protecting Peru's heritage as a country with high cacao diversity and preventing its local resources from being replaced by hybrids, thereby ensuring that this diversity is not lost for future generations. 

This effort is the result of years of genetic selection initiated in 2007 by Cooperativa Agraria Norandino and the Asociación Peruana de Productores de Cacao (APPCACAO), with funding from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through GIZ. 

The study was published in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-026-01127-5.  

About Blanco de Piura cacao 

Peru is home to an extraordinary diversity of native cacao varieties, many of which have been conserved through the efforts of farmers, cooperatives, and research institutions. Blanco de Piura is a native cacao genetic group specific to northern Peru, recognized for its superior sensory characteristics and the unusual pale or white color of its beans. It is classified as fine-flavor cacao, allowing it to command higher prices in specialty markets. 

The study's authors emphasize that identifying, selecting, and promoting local plant material with high productive potential will be essential to strengthening differentiated markets and preventing the loss of valuable genetic resources. 

Native fine-flavor cacao can match commercial varieties in yield 

Renewing trees through grafting with selected native plant material increased production by 59% in just three years. 

Credit

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT

Trust among farmers is key to scaling climate-smart innovations




The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture
Trust among farmers is key to scaling climate-smart innovations 

image: 

The study analyzed data from 514 smallholder farmers involved in Climate-Smart Villages in Guatemala and Honduras. 

view more 

Credit: Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT






Palmira, Colombia, July 21, 2026. A recent study published in Agricultural Systems provides new evidence on the role of social relationships in knowledge sharing among farmers and proposes a new way of understanding how the responsible scaling of climate-smart agricultural innovations begins. 

As the climate becomes increasingly variable and extreme events more frequent, accelerating the use of innovations that can strengthen agricultural resilience has become a priority for agrifood systems. Science has made progress in developing solutions with the potential to help farmers address these challenges. However, ensuring that knowledge about these innovations reaches more farmers and is understood, adapted, and scaled remains one of the major challenges in research for development. 

Addressing this challenge requires understanding not only which innovations work, but also how knowledge about them begins to circulate among farmers. The study Trust, support, and knowledge sharing: The role of social capital in responsible scaling of climate-smart agriculture, published in Agricultural Systems, provides new evidence that this process depends not only on the technical characteristics of an innovation, but also on relationships of trust, mutual support, and knowledge sharing among farmers. 

To examine this question, researchers from the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, the University of Copenhagen, and the Gates Foundation analyzed data from 514 smallholder farmers participating in Climate-Smart Villages—known in Spanish as Territorios Sostenibles Adaptados al Clima (TeSAC)—in Guatemala and Honduras. The aim was to understand how different dimensions of social capital influence knowledge sharing about climate-smart agriculture and what this process means for the responsible scaling of innovations. 

Beyond sharing information, one of the study's main contributions is a new way of examining how agricultural innovations begin to spread. The findings suggest that innovations do not begin to diffuse solely because of their technical characteristics. They also depend on social relationships that enable knowledge to circulate among farmers, allowing new practices to be understood, discussed, and adapted to different contexts. 

The success of an innovation is traditionally assessed once it has already been adopted by large numbers of people. This study, by contrast, focuses attention on a much earlier stage: when farmers begin to share experiences, discuss new practices, address questions, and learn from one another. 

The study proposes that knowledge sharing can be understood as an observable sign of the early stages of responsible scaling. Examining how knowledge circulates among farmers can provide a better understanding of how the processes that may later support broader adoption and expansion of innovations begin to take shape. 

From this perspective, knowledge sharing is not limited to the transmission of technical information. It is a social process through which experiences are shared, discussed, and adapted to different production realities. Understanding these dynamics makes it possible to analyze how knowledge about innovations begins to circulate before adoption becomes visible at scale.  

"Our study shows that the success of scaling does not depend solely on the technical characteristics of an innovation. It also requires understanding the social dynamics that enable knowledge to circulate among farmers. Trust, close relationships between people, and mutual support create conditions that foster knowledge sharing, a process that can be observed as a signal of the early stages of responsible scaling." Dr. Deissy Martínez-Barón, Researcher in Scaling for Impact and Climate Action, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT. 

What does the research reveal? 

  • Trust among farmers plays a fundamental role in enabling knowledge sharing about climate-smart agricultural practices. When farmers trust other members of their community, they are more likely to share experiences, discuss new practices, and learn from one another. 

  • Close relationships among farmers strengthen learning networks, making it easier for knowledge and experience to circulate within communities. These connections create an enabling environment in which knowledge about innovations can be shared, discussed, and adapted to different contexts. 

  • One of the study's most important findings concerns the role of mutual support. The researchers found that it becomes particularly important in communities where levels of trust remain low. Under these circumstances, guidance, collaboration, and the exchange of experiences help sustain the flow of knowledge among farmers. 

  • By contrast, the study found that trust in organizations had less influence than trust built among farmers themselves, highlighting the importance of relationships developed within communities in promoting knowledge sharing. 

  

Finally, the researchers identified a positive association between the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices and knowledge sharing, reinforcing the close relationship between the two processes. 

What does this mean for farmers and decision-makers? 

In practice, these findings help explain how knowledge begins to circulate among farmers. For example, a farmer may observe a neighbor implementing a new practice to cope with drought, discuss the results, adapt the practice to the conditions on their own farm, and later share that experience with other community members. Although the study does not examine individual cases such as this one, it provides evidence that knowledge about innovations begins to circulate among farmers and is an important component of the processes that may support their subsequent expansion. 

For governments, development organizations, and innovation programs, these findings provide evidence of the need to place social dynamics at the center of innovation-scaling processes, as this supports local ownership and, in turn, sustained results and impact over time. The findings also support the responsible scaling approach by showing that understanding how knowledge circulates among farmers can contribute to the design of innovation strategies that are more inclusive, context-sensitive, and better able to anticipate and manage potential unintended consequences that may arise as innovations are scaled up.  

In a context where agrifood systems need to accelerate the adoption of solutions to climate change, this research highlights that the impact of an innovation depends not only on its technical quality, but also on people's ability to share knowledge, learn from one another, and build relationships of trust that enable knowledge to circulate. 

Understanding these processes creates new opportunities to design more effective and inclusive innovation and scaling strategies that are adapted to local realities. 

Link to the study: Trust, support, and knowledge sharing: The role of social capital in responsible scaling of climate-smart agriculture - ScienceDirect 

Trust among farmers is key to scaling climate-smart innovations 

The findings show that trust among farmers is a key factor in increasing the likelihood of knowledge sharing about climate-smart agricultural practices. 

Credit

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT



Journal

DOI

Article Title

Article Publication Date

Removing ‘forever chemicals’ from farmlands — at a fraction of the cost



Yale University




A Yale-led research team has proposed a less expensive — and more environmentally friendly — method for removing certain “forever chemicals” from millions of acres of farmland in the United States and around the world. 

The new process, which is based on data from agricultural sites in Maine. They say it has the potential to address two connected environmental challenges: remediating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that have contaminated agricultural land for decades and scaling up the use of enhanced weathering to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. 

Just as important, the new approach allows previously contaminated cropland to once again be used for an agricultural purpose — unlike current remediation methods. 

“There is an obvious need for new tools to help farmers affected by ‘forever chemicals’ contamination,” said Noah Planavsky, a professor of Earth and planetary science in Yale’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences and the son and brother of farmers. He is also a faculty member of the Yale Center for Natural Carbon Capture and principal investigator for a new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which describes the new method. 

“We outline a path that allows farmers to continue to work their land while restoring soil health,” Planavsky said. 

The research was supported by Yale Planetary Solutions (YPS), a campus-wide initiative that helps advance novel and impactful projects tackling environmental challenges, and Yale Ventures, the university’s hub for innovation and entrepreneurship. 

PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals,” are a class of toxic, man-made chemicals that have been used for decades in hundreds of products, from dental floss and lipstick to frying pans and pizza boxes. PFAS are ubiquitous in the United States, having made their way into groundwater and soil, and then eventually croplands. Only in recent years have scientists begun to understand the full scope of PFAS contamination not just nationally but worldwide. 

“Though this study is U.S.-focused, based on the available data, PFAS are a challenge globally,” said Jake Thompson, an associate researcher in the Planavsky Lab and first author of the study. He is a postdoctoral researcher in Yale’s Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences. 

“This issue — the contamination of agricultural land with PFAS — disproportionately hurts small farmers and organic farmers, who used fertilizers with PFAS before the full extent of the problem was known,”Thompson said. 

How did contamination of “forever chemicals” become so widespread? For years, individuals and factories would flush PFAS into their local sewer system, as part of wastewater. Because forever chemicals don’t decay, they made their way into sewage sludge, which was marketed to farmers as a natural fertilizer. 

That cycle continued for decades, until scientists and public health officials began raising concerns. PFAS, which accumulate in the body over time, have been linked to certain cancers, fertility problems, and immune response issues. The state of Maine, where forever chemicals were found in milk from a dairy farm in 2016, banned the application of sewage sludge on agricultural land in 2022. (Perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], the most widely studied PFAS, was classified as a human carcinogen in 2023, according to the National Institutes of Health.) 

Thompson estimated that 1.2 million hectares (2.96 million acres) of U.S. cropland may be significantly impacted by PFAS. 

Meanwhile, current remediation options for farmland have been limited — and expensive. 

Farmers can excavate the contaminated soil, for instance, or use machines to essentially burn the soil. The cost for such remediation is $800,000 to $1.6 million per hectare, meaning the bill for removing PFAS from American farmland would run to $8 trillion. 

The Yale-led remediation model requires only a fraction of that cost. It is based on two of the most well-known PFAS — perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). 

The system’s first step involves spreading a thin layer of crushed, alkaline rock to the area. This raises the soil’s pH level, which, in turn, accelerates the removal of PFOS from the soil via plants growing there. 

The next step is to create “biochar” — a specialized form of charcoal — from the harvested plants, which destroys both PFOS and PFOA chemicals. This is done by heating the plants with either a large, stationary machine or a smaller, mobile unit. 

Researchers estimate that remediation using this new model costs $1,460 per hectare. Since the process would be repeated each year for up to 20 years, the total cost would be just over $29,000 per hectare — which includes compensation for the farmer’s lost income during treatment. 

The system also has the added benefit of removing carbon dioxide — a greenhouse gas and main contributor to climate change — via enhanced weathering of the crushed rock applied to the soil and biochar generated from biomass. At a national scale, the system could remove 10.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year, the researchers estimate. 

“This is a real pathway to actually give farmers in this situation some agency over their land and leave the soil in better condition than it was before,” Thompson said. 

The research project recently received a Yale Planetary Solutions Impact Accelerator (PSIA) grant. The grants, recently introduced by Yale Planetary Solutions and Yale Ventures, provide mentorship and commercialization guidance to transformative projects that aim to address the root causes of environmental challenges. 

The research is also supported by the Schmidt Family Foundation and the UK-based Natural Environment Research Council. 

Co-authors of the study are Tim Jesper Suhrhoff, Chloe Kent, and Ella Milliken of Yale, Millie Dobson and Rachel James of the University of Southampton in the UK, Yoshiki Kanzaki and Christopher Reinhard of the Georgia Institute of Technology, and Lucinda Bryce of Brown University. 

 

From CO₂, a new way to make chemistry more sustainable



Published in Science, an international study with the contribution of Politecnico di Milano: carbon dioxide can be used as an oxygen source in a key reaction for the production of molecules useful to the chemical, pharmaceutical and materials industries



Politecnico di Milano

infographic 

image: 

infographic

view more 

Credit: Politecnico di Milano





Milano, 26 July 2026 - Carbon dioxide is known above all as one of the main gases responsible for climate change. But, in the laboratory, it can also become a resource for developing safer and more sustainable chemical processes.

This is demonstrated by an international study published in Science, to which Politecnico di Milano and the Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta” contributed. The research opens up a new perspective on the use of CO₂: not only as a carbon source, as is already the case in many lines of research, but also as an oxygen source for obtaining organic molecules of industrial interest.

The result concerns a very important transformation in organic chemistry: the controlled cleavage of the carbon-carbon double bonds present in alkenes. Alkenes are compounds widely used as a starting point for producing chemical intermediates, pharmaceuticals and advanced materials.

Traditionally, highly reactive oxidising substances, such as ozone, or heavy metals and other reagents that can entail safety issues, high costs and waste production, are used to carry out this type of reaction. The new method, instead, uses CO₂ as an oxygen donor, together with visible light and an iron-based catalyst. The reaction takes place at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.

At the heart of the process is a heterogeneous catalyst containing isolated iron atoms on carbon nitride. When illuminated, the catalyst is able to activate CO₂, a molecule that is normally very stable, and transfer its oxygen atoms to alkenes. In this way it is possible to obtain ketones and carboxylic acids, two families of compounds that are very important for chemical synthesis. The method was tested on 45 different compounds, showing good selectivity even in the presence of sensitive chemical groups, which often require additional protection steps in traditional processes.

This study shows that single-atom catalysts, a line of research in which we have been at the forefront for years, continue to open up new opportunities to make chemical processes more efficient, selective and sustainable” comments Gianvito Vilé, professor of Chemical Engineering at Politecnico di Milano. “It is a fundamental research result, but it points to a promising direction for designing safer oxidation processes that are less dependent on aggressive reagents.”

 

The contribution of Politecnico di Milano focused in particular on the design and characterisation of the catalyst. Gianvito Vilé and Xiufang He, a postdoctoral researcher in Professor Vilé’s group, participated in the research.

The study is the result of an international collaboration led by the University of Bayreuth, which involved the Leibniz Institute for Catalysis in Germany, Politecnico di Milano and the National Research Council in Italy, Jagiellonian University in Poland and Stockholm University in Sweden.

The work does not yet represent an industrial technology ready for use, but demonstrates a new principle: even a stable molecule that is difficult to activate such as CO₂ can become an active part of more sustainable chemical processes, thanks to the combination of light, catalysis and abundant metals such as iron.

 

Learning to live with uncertainty may pay off at work



People don’t need the perfect job to find meaning in their work, study finds



American Psychological Association






WASHINGTON — People who accept that there may not always be a perfect career choice and learn to make decisions despite uncertainty are more likely to find their work meaningful, satisfying and engaging, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.

The findings, published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology, suggest that workers who understand that their career development may be affected by factors beyond their control develop “career wisdom” that may help them navigate today's increasingly unpredictable job market.

“Many people feel pressure to find the perfect job or make the perfect career choice,” said lead author Hui Xu, PhD, of the University of Macau. “Our findings suggest a different possibility: meaningful work may come not only from finding the ideal path, but also from learning how to live with uncertainty, make thoughtful trade-offs and build a sense of meaning within imperfect circumstances.”

The researchers describe career wisdom as a developable psychological resource—a capacity that helps people make career decisions when there is no obvious "right" answer. Rather than searching for the perfect job, career wisdom encourages people to gather as much information as they can, accept that some uncertainty will always remain, trust their intuition and move forward despite discomfort. Unlike personality traits, career wisdom can be developed through education and counseling.

The study followed 995 employed adults in the United States over six months. Participants completed assessments at three points, each about three months apart. At the start of the study, researchers measured participants' level of career wisdom using a 20-item scale that assessed how they typically approached difficult career decisions, with items capturing wisdom-related strategies such as making choices with incomplete information, trusting their intuition and embracing vulnerability. Participants rated how strongly they agreed or disagreed with each statement on a scale of 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to use career wisdom. Three months later, researchers measured how meaningful participants found their work. Three months after that, they measured job satisfaction, life satisfaction and work engagement.

Researchers found that people who scored higher on career wisdom at the start of the study were more likely to report a stronger sense of meaning in their work three months later. That greater sense of meaningful work, in turn, predicted higher job satisfaction and work engagement another three months later. The relationship with life satisfaction was weaker, suggesting career wisdom may have a more direct influence on work-related well-being over the six-month study period.

Xu said the research was inspired by interactions with students and clients who were struggling with career decision-making, despite having plenty of information about their options.

“Many people struggle because they have difficulty finding peace with the inevitable uncertainty surrounding the ‘right’ career choice,” Xu said. “That led me to ask a more practical question: What actionable strategies can people use to navigate career uncertainty and achieve adaptive career outcomes?”

The findings suggest that career wisdom may improve later well-being by inspiring workers to find more meaning in their work. According to Xu, “this tells us that career wisdom is not just about feeling calm in the face of uncertainty. It may also help people actively create or recognize meaning in their work.”

“Learning to make decisions with incomplete information, trust intuition and accept vulnerability may actually help people explore themselves and their lives more deeply and find forms of meaning that cannot always be reached through reasoning alone,” he added.

The researchers also found that the relationships between career wisdom, meaningful work and well-being were consistent across gender, race and socioeconomic status, suggesting its potential benefits may extend across diverse groups of workers.

“One implication is that career counseling and career education may need to go beyond helping people gather information and make rational plans,” Xu said. “Those are still valuable, but people also need help dealing with the uncertainty that remains after all the information has been gathered.”

He also emphasized that career wisdom is not about making random or impulsive decisions.

 “Rather, it means balancing rational problem-solving with the ability to move forward when complete certainty is impossible,” Xu said.

The researchers noted several limitations. Although the study followed participants over time, it was observational and cannot prove that career wisdom directly causes greater meaning at work or improved well-being. All measures were based on participants' self-reported survey responses, and participants were recruited through an online research platform. Future research should examine whether the findings hold across different occupations, cultures and longer periods of time, and whether interventions designed to increase career wisdom can improve people's work lives.

Article:Facilitating Meaningful Work: How Career Wisdom Relates to Well-Being,” by Hui Xu, PhD, University of Macau, and Blake A. Allan, PhD, University of Houston. Journal of Counseling Psychology, published online July 23, 2026.

Contact: Hui Xu, PhD, can be reached at huixu@um.edu.mo.