WAGE THEFT
Firm Telling Associates They Won't Be Getting Bonuses After Claiming To Match Market
This feels like the rug getting pulled out.
(Image via Getty)
I wonder if this speaks to why Shearman & Sterling is so hot to get a merger done with Hogan Lovells.
A lot of law firms suffered slowdowns over 2022, but bonus season reminded us all that Biglaw mostly remains resilient in the face of some economic speedbumps. We thought Shearman was no exception when it first informed that it would match the Baker McKenzie bonus scale.
But the promise to meet the market was a little less than advertised. One Shearman tipster reports:
they had a zoom meeting towards the end of the year announcing there would be an hours requirement in order to get your bonus when previously Shearman has been known to not have billable hours requirements. Since the firm has been slow this year they are telling associates they didn’t meet the hours requirement and are not eligible for a bonus.
Hourly requirements are common across Biglaw, but adding one at this juncture is just an effort to pawn off a slow year on the employees with the least responsibility for the firm’s problems.
And another tipster suggests that the hours requirement is just one piece of a multi-pronged effort to get out of paying bonuses:
After Shearman & Sterling announced that it will pay bonuses to on track associates earlier this month, we are now being informed by phone calls that despite being on track and in good standing we will not get any bonus this year. They started calling associates earlier this week just a few days before payment day and did not provide any other explanation.
This isn’t a complete picture and it’s entirely possible that some associates are still getting bonuses on the prior announced scale. But adding requirements and making last second individual “bonus condolence” calls paint an unflattering picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment