Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Donald Trump Uses New Insult Against Democratic Rivals

Cameron Adams
Mon, August 10, 2026 
DAILY BEAST

President Donald Trump has escalated the attacks on his political foes by adding another twisted smear to his MAGA vocabulary.

Trump, 80, has a history of obsessing over certain phrases, including his grammatically challenged "Dumocrats," which he often needs to explain.

While signing an executive order in the White House on Monday, Trump used a soft question on his advice for the Democrats ahead of the midterm elections to take his latest insult out for a spin.


President Donald Trump has another insult for Democrats. / Kylie Cooper / REUTERS

"We have jihadists being elected all over the place," Trump said, adding, "We have this whether it's communism, jihadism..."

Trump has been throwing out the communist line over the past weeks; however, the president appears to be heightening his rhetoric, CNN notes. Trump added Monday that a friend told him to use the term "jihadists."

Trump did not specify who he was referring to with the smear, although the president has called Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist elected as New York City's first Muslim mayor in November, a "pure, true communist."



Zohran Mamdani met Donald Trump in the White House. / Jonathan Ernst / Reuters

He also appears to have stepped up his smears after progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed defeated Haley Stevens in Michigan's Democratic Senate primary election last week.

The president has referred to El-Sayed, who is Muslim, as a "communist loser who hates Jews and Israel" on Truth Social.

The president posted a fear-mongering photo of El-Sayed on Truth Social on Monday evening, adding the caption, "They are coming for your home and your belongings."


Donald Trump posts about Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed. / Truth Social

Last week, after El-Sayed's electoral success, the senior president posted an image of himself and his wife, Melania Trump, 56, alongside El-Sayed, 41, and his wife, Dr. Sarah Jukaku, with the caption: "Two VERY DIFFERENT America's."

Trump deliberately used El-Sayed's full name, a choice that echoes his repeated emphasis on Barack Obama's middle name, "Hussein."

The president used El-Sayed's full name in his post. / @realDonaldTrump/ TruthSocial

El-Sayed does not identify as a communist or socialist, but comes from the progressive side of the Democratic Party. The Michigan-born epidemiologist would become the Senate's first Muslim member if he is elected in November.

During his White House remarks on Monday about the unnamed "jihadists," Trump suggested they had "come from other failed countries," but said he wouldn't mention which one to avoid a possible "controversy."

He then immediately continued, "They come from countries that are not great. They come from, let's say, as an example, Somalia. They come in and then they tell us how our Constitution, how our Declaration of Independence, how it works. Uh, it doesn't work that way. And they're not smart. They have no aptitude."

One of Trump's regular foes is Minnesota Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar, who was born in Somalia, but arrived in the U.S. as a 12-year-old refugee in 1995. She is now a naturalized citizen.

Trump has regularly berated the 43-year-old, and posted on Truth Social in January that she should be "sent back to Somalia" to "MAKE SOMALIA GREAT AGAIN!"



U.S. Representatives Ilhan Omar, Democrat from Minnesota, and Rashida Tlaib, Democrat from Michigan, shout as President Donald Trump at the State of the Union in February. / ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP via Getty ImagesMore

The Daily Beast has contacted the White House for comment.

CNN's Anderson Cooper discussed Trump's new "jihadist" smear on AC360 on Monday, noting it plays to "the worst stereotypes."

While Trump claimed on Monday his friend has suggested he use the term "jihadists," he previously mentioned it on his social media several years ago.

He posted on Truth Social in November 2023, that he wanted to restore a travel ban on "terror-plagued countries," entering the U.S., claiming that "if you sympathize with jihadists, then we don't want you in our country."

A post in September 2024, also saw Trump post a video where he again promoted his earlier travel bans, saying that kept "terrorists, jihadists and violent extremists" out of the U.S.
‘Voters are fed up’: Michigan primary forces Democratic party to accept leftwing shift

David Smith
Sat, August 8, 2026 
THE GUARDIAN


Abdul El-Sayed, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Zohran Mamdani.Illustration: Guardian Design / Getty Images

Standing before The Spirit of Detroit, a landmark bronze statue in the city's downtown, in the early hours of a Wednesday morning, Abdul El-Sayed channelled boxing great Muhammad Ali. "We shook up the world," he declared.

The 41-year-old former public health official had just delivered a knockout blow to the Democratic establishment, defeating the US congresswoman Haley Stevens to claim the party's nomination for the Senate in swing state Michigan.

El-Sayed had campaigned on a boldly progressive agenda of universal healthcare, halting military aid to Israel and sweeping campaign finance reform. The moderate Stevens had received $60m from outside groups, including $30m from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) and its affiliates.

It was the latest and possibly biggest tremor in a political earthquake consuming the Democratic party. Its leftwing insurgency was no longer confined to deep blue coastal cities; it had breached the walls of a critical midwestern swing state. Now it is forcing a reckoning about the party's leadership and its ideological direction ahead of the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

Matt Duss, executive vice-president of the Center for International Policy and a former foreign policy adviser to the leftwing senator Bernie Sanders, said: "It's dissatisfaction with the status quo. It's dissatisfaction with the establishment. This is an anti-system moment.

"We see this not just in our country but in democracies around the world. Voters are fed up with an elite establishment that is simply not delivering for them, that doesn't feel their pain, that doesn't seem to know or care about their struggles, and that's part of why Abdul succeeded."

The past decade of US politics has been dominated by the rightwing populism of Donald Trump. But leftwing populism has been running – and flourishing – on a parallel track since Sanders' outsider campaign for president in 2016 was ultimately beaten back by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment.

Duss added: "The 2016 Sanders campaign was sort of the Big Bang for the rebirth of the progressive left in the United States. We've got a lot of others who joined Bernie. We've got a lot of great leaders on the progressive left now and are glad to have Abdul El-Sayed run."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a bartender who was an organiser for Sanders' 2016 campaign, pulled off a stunning upset two years later against an incumbent in New York's 14th district, becoming, at 29, the youngest woman ever to serve in the House of Representatives. She was joined by a small but vocal group of progressives known as "the Squad".

Sanders ran again in 2020 and, though he lost to establishment figure Joe Biden, his team had significant input into the surprisingly progressive agenda of the Biden presidency. But the events of 2024 – Biden's abortive run for a second term, Kamala Harris's coronation and Donald Trump's return to power – exposed a chasm between the party leadership and the grassroots

Last November, Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist laser-focused on affordability, beat the establishment favourite Andrew Cuomo to become the first Muslim mayor of New York. He then helped three insurgent candidates win Democratic primary elections in New York. The "Mamdani effect" swept through Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Washington state, Wisconsin and Washington DC.

The driving factors include frustration with Trump, the cost of living, corporate money in politics and the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Reuters/ Ipsos polling showed Israel's favorability among Democrats plummeting from 59% in 2018 to just 22% in May 2026. The influx of Aipac money into political campaigns has become toxic for younger voters.

In Michigan, which has the highest percentage of Arab Americans relative to population, El-Sayed accused Israel of committing genocide and built his campaign around a demand to end unconditional US military aid to the country. This positioned him directly against Stevens, who defended the US-Israel relationship and benefited from massive Aipac spending.

El-Sayed's ultimate victory – coupled with wins for progressives Will Lawrence and Donavan McKinney in House races in Michigan – marked a watershed moment, a high-stakes proof of concept challenging the myth that leftwing populists cannot win elections outside Democratic strongholds.

Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, perceives a general break within the party flowing from various sources including the "staleness" of its current leaders, Chuck Schumer in the Senate and Hakeem Jeffries in the House – both ardent supporters of Israel. "Gaza and Israel has become a lightning rod for all the other issues," he added. "There's a sense that the Democrats have been patsies in the face of Donald Trump. When Democrats say they want to fight back, they mean it.

"Donald Trump has radicalised the Democratic party," he said. "This revolt within the party would not have happened without Donald Trump. He is provoking a kind of earthquake, raising lots of unsettling questions within the Democratic party – its direction, its leadership, its policy priorities, its beholdenness to big donors."

Trump has rattled the old orthodoxies that prevailed in US politics for decades. If the right can conceive a radical programme in documents such as Project 2025, why can the left not be similarly ambitious? There is little appetite to return to the pre-Trump era, a broken system that led to his rise in the first place, but rather to reimagine wealth redistribution, stronger unions, democratic reform and a just foreign policy.

Joseph Geevarghese, executive director of Our Revolution, a group born out of Sanders' 2016 run, said: "You're seeing a maturation of the progressive movement. You're seeing the infrastructure that's been built over a decade come into play. There's a resonance of the message in reaction to the failed populism of the right but you're also seeing increased sophistication in the organisation of the left."

The rise of groups such as the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has occurred in tandem with a crisis of confidence and identity within the centrist wing of the Democratic party. At a moment when Trump paints the landscape in big and bold primary colours, the moderates are widely seen as timid incrementalists who lack ideas or superstars to compete with El-Sayed, Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez.

Geevarghese commented: "Because some of their funding depends on corporate donors, moderates have to pull punches. They are not able to articulate the causes of people's problems. You've got progressives who are able to call out the corporate class and the corruption of our politics and how that affects people's standard of living."

***
Even as they recognise the ground shifting beneath their feet, progressives warn that centrists are not likely to surrender the power they enjoy courtesy of Wall Street and Silicon Valley without a fight.

Norman Solomon, director of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy, said: "One might say that hell has no fury like corporate Democrats scorned. I'm thrilled by the results in Michigan but at the same time I'm a bit apprehensive about the blowback from the powerful forces that have been accustomed to literally running the national Democratic party for many decades, arguably since the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was so successful at the beginning of the 1990s."

The DLC was founded by Al From, who in 1989 handpicked Bill Clinton to steer the Democratic party toward the centre ground, creating the "Third Way" movement that was pivotal to his 1992 victory and later emulated by Tony Blair in Britain.

From reflected this week: "We've been focusing on beating Republicans and the democratic socialists have been focused on beating us. We've got to fight back. We've got to make it harder for them."

When Clinton first campaigned for president, 43% of Americans thought of themselves as moderate, compared with 36% conservative and 17% liberal. That picture has changed radically in the intervening years of polarisation.

"Our formula is the right formula," From insisted. "Obviously we're in a different world and you have to communicate it different and you'll need ideas that further the same underlying values, as we did, but they've got to be modern ideas, maybe different ideas because circumstances have changed. Our platform was for the 1990s, not for the 2030s, but the principles are the same.

"The democratic socialists want a different system. They don't want to further democratic values. You look at their platform: they want to get rid of the Senate, the presidency, the supreme court; they want ownership of business; they want to get rid of police; they don't want to fund the military.

"That isn't the historic Democratic party. It's not the party of Roosevelt that saved capitalism and saved democracy in the world in world war two. It's a different ideology, it's a different party. "

The true test of viability for El-Sayed – a Rhodes scholar, doctor and son of Egyptian immigrants – will come in November when he faces Mike Rogers, a former Republican congressman, in a race that could determine the balance of power in the Senate. After an unusually rancorous campaign, El-Sayed was quick to urge "the things that unite us are so much bigger than the things that divide us," and Stevens was equally quick to back him.

Indeed, progressives and moderates across the country are likely to maintain an uneasy coexistence for the midterms as each plays to their demographical and geographical strengths in common cause against Republicans. Trump and the House speaker, Mike Johnson, have been seeking to revive a cold war-style panic by branding democratic socialists as "radical Marxists" and "godless communists".

Donna Brazile, a political strategist and former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, said: "The question is, can two different wings of the same party function, unify and function as a governing majority if the Democrats win the majority? I contend that the answer is yes. We'll agree on very important matters like the economy, improving the lives of the American people, making things more affordable again and not focusing on vanity projects, so the extent that we're all running on the same message of affordability, the answer is yes."

But then comes 2028 and a time for choosing. The centrist group Third Way is planning a new $15m effort to discredit democratic socialism between now and the next presidential election, the New York Times reported. Some Democrats argue that progressives have won only a handful of races – albeit high-profile ones – among hundreds taking place across the country and the extent of the insurgency is exaggerated. Others believe the Michigan result means the leftwing lane just got wider.

Geevarghese commented: "All of the electoral energy and enthusiasm is on the left and, at the end of the day, for a candidate to be viable in the 2028 presidential, they're going to have to articulate a full-throated economic populism. That's what's needed to make it through the primary and ultimately that's what's going to be needed to be the antidote to Donald Trump."

Speculation is already swirling around who might carry the progressive banner into the next presidential primary. Mamdani, born outside the US, is not eligible to run, and has said he does not want to. Congressman Ro Khanna of California, who campaigned for El-Sayed, is frequently mentioned but the most intense focus is on Ocasio-Cortez, who is 36.

Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center thinktank in Washington, said: "If I were AOC's advisers, I would look her in the eye and say, 'Do you want to be president? If you want it to be president, the time is now. You will never have a better chance to own a lane that wants a leader.'

"One of the things we've seen across the world in the last decade is young female leaders captivating the left. Why not a 39-year-old AOC?"
U.S. Soccer joins call for 'meaningful change' after UEFA, Concacaf and AFC release joint letter condemning Gianni Infantino



Chris Cwik
Contributing writer
YAHOO SPORTS
Mon, August 10, 2026 


UEFA and Concacaf are continuing to put pressure on FIFA president Gianni Infantino. Following news that Infantino wanted to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors, both UEFA and Concacaf have emerged as the biggest critics of the president, suggesting he needs to resign.

On Monday, they continued to up that pressure, and found a third confederation to join their crusade. The Asian Football Confederation (AFC), Concacaf and UEFA released a joint statement Monday, outlining the reasons they believe FIFA needs new leadership.

Shortly after that statement was released, U.S. Soccer, Canada Soccer, CFU (Caribbean Football Union) and UNCAF (Central American Football Union) also banded together to ask for "meaningful change that strengthens FIFA's governance, transparency and accountability."

In the original statement released by UEFA, Concacaf and AFC, which was titled, "Open letter to the football family," the three confederations make it clear that they are united in their opinion that one person is not responsible for success in the sport, and that soccer's accomplishments are shared among "FIFA, the confederations, the member associations and the thousands of people who dedicate their lives to the game."

The letter then takes Infantino to task for his leadership and integrity.


"This is about something more fundamental: the integrity of the game, and the integrity of those elected to lead it.

"Leadership in football is not a possession. It is not about holding — or demanding — power to be held. It is a duty of service to the football family that entrusts it.

"When trust is broken through deception, when an individual places himself above the collective that entrusted him with authority, that duty has been abandoned."

The three confederations then criticized Infantino's approach after his private-investor plan fell through. The confederations accuse Infantino of failing to communicate his plan ahead of time and then not providing an adequate timeline for member associations to properly review the issue before bringing it to a vote. The confederations also said FIFA did not "acknowledge that the proposal itself was inherently wrong."

While FIFA has stated it would present a full report of how the proposal came to be, the confederations noted they don't trust FIFA to conduct that review itself, calling for a "fully independent third party" to be responsible for a review.

In the wake of mounting pressure, Infantino held a FIFA leadership meeting in Morocco on Wednesday. The confederations questioned that decision, noting that there were few elected officials present at the meeting and that no FIFA council members or member associations were invited to take part in them.

The confederations also pointed out that select members of the FIFA management committee were asked to attend that meeting, not the full committee. And questioned why Infantino scheduled that meeting abroad, and not at FIFA headquarters in Zurich.

The letter concludes:


"There is silence where there should be accountability, distance where there should be openness.

"These are not the qualities football deserves in its leadership. That is why we have taken this stance: not lightly and not alone, but together, and out of duty to the game we serve.

"Football's strength has always been its unity. We call for that unity to be honoured now, for leadership that serves football, not seeks to command it."

The letter never names Infantino and does not explicitly call for him to resign, though its messaging about leadership seems to heavily imply Infantino should allow someone else to take charge.

Additionally, multiple reports have suggested UEFA, Concacaf and AFC are considering banding together to host their own competitions so players can continue to compete. When news of Infantino's private-investor plan first broke, UEFA announced it would boycott the World Cup and all FIFA-run events. It appears the confederation is following through on that threat.

For U.S. Soccer, it marks the strongest statement the organization has made regarding Infantino and his leadership. It's unclear whether U.S. Soccer, Canada Soccer, CFU and UNCAF will band together to build their own competitions or take additional steps to put pressure on Infantino.

Following massive criticism of that plan, FIFA eventually backpedaled, announcing the plan to sell stakes in the World Cup was scrapped.

Though the deal was dead, criticism of Infantino did not stop. Multiple member associations announced they would not support Infantino's reelection effort. Infantino is up for reelection as FIFA's president in March 2027. No candidate has stepped forward to challenge Infantino for that role yet.

With pressure mounting, Infantino called an emergency meeting in Morocco in early August. FIFA later put out a statement calling it a "constructive" meeting and noting that Infantino still had the support of members of the FIFA management board.

In the days since that meeting, Infantino has received support from some FAs, including Argentina's and Mexico's, among others.
Jeff Bezos Harshly Criticized for $200 Million Pledge to Protect the World’s Most Endangered Species

Joe Wilkins
Sun, August 9, 2026 
FUTURISM


Photos active / Shutterstock


Jeff Bezos and Leonardo DiCaprio have pledged millions of dollars to protect 100 of the world’s most threatened animal species through the Phoenix Species Project.

Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos and his actor buddy Leonardo DiCaprio are catching some heavy flak recently, but for a seemingly bizarre reason: pledging millions of dollars to protect 100 of the world's most threatened animal species.

The charity initiative, called the Phoenix Species Project, was first revealed on DiCaprio's Instagram account, where the six-time academy award nominee described it as the "largest single philanthropic initiative ever dedicated to the recovery of Critically Endangered species, across 30 countries."

"I could not be prouder to announce this," DiCaprio continued. "Save these species, and we protect everything around them. The forests, the rivers, and the climate itself."

For such a seemingly altruistic venture, the response to the announcement was strikingly polarized. As the Independent noted, DiCaprio and Bezos were summarily blasted for engaging in "greenwashing," a negative term given to the strategy employed by massive corporations and the wealthy to cover their outsize impact on the environment with a little eco-charity.

"As soon as people realize and actually feel the effects of what those rich f***s did to our planet they suddenly start their greenwashing campaign," one Redditor wrote in response to the announcement, per the Independent.

"Uber-wealthy people helping a fraction of the problems that they cause," another commenter lamented. "For publicity."

It certainly wouldn't be the first time Bezos has been accused of greenwashing, especially given the immense carbon footprint of his flagship company Amazon. In 2020, for example, the billionaire's Bezos Earth Fund pledged $10 billion to protect biodiversity, bringing a massive amount of money to the global effort to mitigate climate change — at least on paper.

As the backlash illustrates, your reaction to the those types of efforts probably hinge on your economic and social worldview.

The haters aren't just being petty, though. As the Journal of Political Inquiry observed, Bezos's wealth is only possible thanks to his previous position as chief executive of one of the largest corporate polluters on the planet. Between 2020 and 2021 alone, Amazon's carbon dioxide emissions grew by 18 percent, while his space company Blue Origin is altering the outer atmosphere in ways we're only starting to understand.

And his empire's carbon emissions have only skyrocketed since then, as the demand for cloud computing supersedes previous pledges to clamp down on Amazon's extraordinary excretions of noxious pollutants.

In other words, it's no wonder the masses are rising up in opposition to the billionaire and his actor friend — if only online, at least for now.

 Google co-founder Sergey Brin has now spent $100 million to fight the billionaire tax



Amanda Silberling
Mon, August 10, 2026 


Sergey Brin, president of Alphabet and co-founder of Google Inc., speaks during the 2016 Global Entrepreneurship Summit (GES) at Stanford University in Stanford, California, U.S., on Friday, June 24, 2016. The annual event brings together entrepreneurs from around the world for 3 days of networking, workshops and conferences. 
Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has donated another $20 million to Build a Better California, an organization advocating against California's proposed billionaire tax, according to a new filing. That means that the world's fourth-richest man, whose net worth hovers around $267 billion, has now spent more than $100 million to avoid an estimated $13.3 billion tax payment.

California's Prop 40, known as the billionaire tax, would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of around 200 billionaires that live in the state. The windfall from this proposed tax would mostly go toward funding California's healthcare programs. The state's Medicaid program alone could lose up to $30 billion in federal funding once Trump's budget cuts take effect next year.

Brin isn't the only tech mogul seeking ways to avoid such a tax. It's no coincidence that Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg reportedly bought a $170 million mansion near Miami this year. Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, venture capitalist Peter Thiel, and Brin's fellow Google co-founder Larry Page have also left the state.

Prop 40 has also generated dissent from Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA), who is concerned about the economic impact of these billionaires and their businesses fleeing California. Instead, Newsom has called for a "national billionaires' tax."

"Today, the office worker can shoulder a higher tax rate than the heiress," Newsom noted in the blog post. "We should end the 'tax-free lifestyle loan,' the gimmick that lets the ultra-wealthy borrow against their stock portfolios while reporting no taxable income."

Californians will vote on Prop 40 in November. The organization that Brin is funding has proposed opposing ballot measures that, if passed, could effectively block Prop 40 by limiting the introduction of new taxes.

Meanwhile, Nvidia co-founder and unlikely working class hero Jensen Huang says he's "perfectly fine" paying the tax.

"I have not even thought about it once," Huang, who would owe around $8 billion in taxes, said in a January interview with Bloomberg. "We chose to live in Silicon Valley, and whatever taxes they would like to apply, so be it. I'm perfectly fine with it."

























South Korea to launch $3.5 billion chip fund, speed development of semiconductor hubs


By Kyu-seok Shim and Heejin Kim
Mon, August 10, 2026 


FILE PHOTO: South Korean President Lee Jae Myung attends a press conference at the Alvorada Palace in Brasilia, Brazil, July 27, 2026. REUTERS/Adriano Machado/File Photo

SEOUL, Aug 10 (Reuters) - South Korea will launch a 5 trillion won ($3.52 billion) semiconductor fund targeting promising chip materials, parts, equipment and fabless companies, ‌a presidential official said, as Seoul seeks to accelerate plans for new chip manufacturing hubs across the ‌country.

The government will also provide a further 5 trillion won in trade finance for suppliers, Presidential Chief of Staff Kang Hoon-sik told a press ​briefing after a meeting chaired by President Lee Jae Myung on Monday.

The measures are part of Lee's semiconductor megaproject initiative unveiled in June, under which Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, together with suppliers and local governments, are expected to invest more than $576 billion in new chip manufacturing projects, including major fabrication facilities in the country's southwest region.

"The government will create a new ‌semiconductor fund worth about 5 trillion won ⁠focused on promising materials, parts and equipment firms and fabless companies," Kang said.

The government would also launch a 10-year, 1 trillion won programme to support cooperation between large companies and smaller ⁠suppliers across semiconductor development, testing and production, Kang said.

The government will also seek passage of a Mega Special Zone Act at parliament within the year to speed up permits, environmental reviews and infrastructure construction, he said.

In his opening remarks before Monday's meeting, ​which was ​also attended by senior executives from Samsung Electronics and SK, ​Lee urged the Defence Ministry to relocate functions ‌of a military air base in Gwangju by mid-2028 to accelerate development of a semiconductor manufacturing complex planned for the site.

The government has designated the 8.3 million-square-metre area (9.9 million square yards) as a candidate national industrial complex and plans to complete relocation and temporary dispersal of military facilities by the second half of 2028.

Kang said the government would ensure power and water supplies are available on schedule for new semiconductor projects.

For the planned chip cluster in the southwestern Gwangju-South ‌Jeolla region, authorities plan to secure 650,000 metric tons of water ​daily by 2030 using recycled wastewater and supplies from nearby dams, he ​said.

For the Yongin semiconductor cluster, South Korea's flagship ​chip manufacturing project south of Seoul, Kang said the government plans to supply 14.7 gigawatts of ‌electricity by 2041 using a combination of cogeneration ​facilities, LNG generation and power ​from other regions.

Kang said megaprojects worth over 350 trillion won in other regions of the country are scheduled to begin construction or facility expansions this year, while a further 57 trillion won of research and development ​projects are also due to start.

The Lee ‌administration has made expanding semiconductor production capacity a central pillar of its industrial strategy, arguing that existing ​production bases around Yongin and Pyeongtaek will not be sufficient to meet demand driven by artificial ​intelligence.

(Reporting by Kyu-seok Shim and Heejin KimEditing by Ed Davies)

 Elon Musk Plans to Spend $119 Billion to Construct the World’s Largest Building, Just Outside Houston


AJ Tiarsmith
Mon, August 10, 2026 
24/7 Wall St. 


Key takeaways

Tesla and SpaceX have confirmed the construction of Terafab, a massive chip megafactory in Texas with $16.8 billion committed for phase one of a potential $119 billion project.See more

Quick Read

Tesla (TSLA) and SpaceX confirmed Terafab, a 100-million-square-foot Texas chip megafactory, with $16.8 billion committed for phase one of a $119 billion ceiling.


Intel (INTC) joined Terafab but hasn't disclosed its contribution, while SpaceX's only binding commitment is $5 billion invested and 1,800 jobs by 2035.

On August 6, 2026, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and SpaceX formally confirmed Terafab, a jointly built semiconductor megafactory in Grimes County, Texas, just north of Houston. On X, Elon Musk called it "the largest and most valuable building on Earth by far." The site plans exceed 100 million square feet of manufacturing space, more than five times China's New Century Global Center and larger than the Pentagon, Apple Park, and Mall of America combined.


Getty Images

The pitch is vertical integration at a scale nobody has attempted. Terafab will house manufacturing, packaging, and testing of advanced logic and memory chips in a single facility, aimed squarely at the bottleneck Musk keeps hitting: there are not enough chips on Earth to build the Optimus robots, Cybercabs, and space-based data centers he has pitched investors. SpaceX describes the plant as designed to "bridge the divide between current global chip supply and the compute demand of the future", with a stated production goal of more than 1 terawatt of compute per year optimized for edge inference.

The money framing matters. What is committed now is $16.8 billion for the first phase. The widely quoted $119 billion figure is a multi-phase ceiling SpaceX disclosed in its May 2026 filings, first reported by TechCrunch on May 6, 2026, and represents a top-end estimate, not confirmed spend. The legally binding floor is more modest: agreements signed by SpaceX CFO Bret Johnsen commit at least $5 billion in Grimes County by 2030 and at least 1,800 full-time jobs by 2035. Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) has agreed to contribute but has been vague about the size of its commitment.

Beyond the binding floor, the partners are promising at least 3,000 jobs across Grimes and neighboring Brazos County, with early production as soon as 2027 and mass production targeted for 2028. Texas is sweetening the deal: SpaceX received a $30 million Texas Enterprise Fund grant, and the project qualifies under the state's Texas Jobs, Energy, Technology, and Innovation program. Musk first floated Terafab in Austin on March 22, 2026; the Grimes County selection ends months of speculation.


Water was the community's first question, and the answer is unusual. The site sits on Gibbons Creek Reservoir, which previously cooled a coal-fired power plant that closed in 2018. SpaceX has committed to drawing process water from the reservoir rather than local groundwater, a concession clearly aimed at farmers worried about aquifer draw.


Local reaction has been split. A Grimes County meeting on Wednesday, August 5, drew hundreds of residents objecting to the scale of tax breaks and what they described as a lack of transparency. On the other side, Anderson-Shiro Consolidated ISD Superintendent Dr. Sarah Borowicz, in a statement released by the Texas Governor's office, said: "We believe this agreement will strengthen our district, expand opportunities, and better prepare our students for their future."

The signal to watch over the next 18 months is straightforward: does the first-phase $16.8 billion translate into groundbreaking on a fab bigger than the Pentagon, Apple Park, and Mall of America combined, or does the $119 billion ceiling quietly recede into the same category as every other Musk moonshot timeline?



Amazon Used a Startlingly Dirty Trick to Build a Data Center Without Consent of Community


Victor Tangermann
Mon, August 10, 2026 
FUTURISM


Shutterstock / Futurism

Tech giants like Amazon are finding ways to circumvent local opposition to building resource-hogging data centers in rural communities, sparking conflict in city council meetings.

A quiet war is playing out in rural communities across the country.

City council meetings are bursting into conflict as local residents try to keep AI data centers out of their backyards. Americans are starting to see through the promises of tech companies and the local politicians they've wooed, realizing that the advantages of hosting a resource-hogging data center in the neighborhood are slim.

Yet tech giants are finding creative — and sometimes startlingly dirty — new ways to circumvent local opposition in their quest to build out these sprawling facilities. As the Wall Street Journal reports, Amazon exploited 45-year-old zoning laws in Gilroy, California, to start construction on a data center without any residents knowing for five entire years.

"Many if not most residents first learned about this project after construction had already begun," local elementary-school teacher Coleen Crew told the town's recent council meeting, as quoted by the WSJ.

A single city staffer, the community's development director, greenlit Amazon's 438,500-square-foot data center, which spans 56 acres of former farmland. The ancient zoning criteria allowed industrial development along the location on a local freeway.

Gilroy's mayor was surprised his constituents suddenly wanted a say.

"It didn't bother them that a food-distribution center came to Gilroy without their engagement, but now it bothers them that a data center is coming to Gilroy without them having the possibility of engagement," he told the WSJ.

There are plenty of reasons why residents would be against Amazon's latest project. Data centers are a massive resource hog and have been known to raise electricity prices, spike local greenhouse gas emissions, generate ear-splitting noise, and taint water supplies. They are not typically major job creators.

In short, likening it to a "food-distribution center" isn't exactly a fair comparison.

Amazon Web Services president of economic development Roger Wehner told the WSJ that the company "followed standard approval processes for an industrially zoned parcel," but acknowledged that it should've recognized the community's desire for "more engagement sooner."

"We've since met directly with residents and hosted an open house to hear feedback and answer questions," he added.

City officials are now wondering whether to change the approval process in ways that would force developers to hold community meetings and engage with residents.

When resident Rosa Rodriguez found out about the project, she asked city staff in February to publicly comment on an environmental review report, citing concerns over the drought the region is facing. But planners shut her down, telling her the comment period had closed back in September 2024, long before she knew about the project's existence.

Amazon has since tried to win over the public, touting a new wastewater pipeline, tax revenue, construction jobs, and even the sponsorship of the annual Gilroy Garlic Festival. However, frustrated residents weren't mollified, demanding to at least be made aware of big unfolding projects like the data center.

The world's leading AI companies are all struggling to contain their latest models


Business Insider
Lakshmi Varanasi
Sun, August 9, 2026 

The latest models from the top AI labs keep doing things they aren't supposed to during testing.

It's raising concerns about AI's growing capabilities and the human capacity to contain it.

It's also building some serious hype around the next generation of frontier AI models.

The most powerful AI models keep going awry, according to the companies building them.

The disclosures come as frontier AI models get more powerful and more capable of acting autonomously. They also highlight a growing challenge for the companies building them —the systems designed to test increasingly capable models can have weaknesses of their own.

Over the past few weeks, multiple frontier AI models have accessed real systems during cybersecurity testing.

Researchers on Friday said China's popular new Kimi K3 model, made by Moonshot AI, circumvented restrictions in its test environment. Anthropic and Meta also said recently that their own latest models have done things they aren't supposed to. OpenAI kicked it all off last month when its models went to great — and worrisome — lengths to hack into another company.

Amid heightened concern, OpenAI said Friday that its as-yet-unreleased model, Astra, is demonstrating cyber capabilities so advanced that the company can no longer rule out assigning it the highest-risk designation.

As a result, OpenAI said it is pausing work on Astra that doesn't meet new safeguards, and said it will work with government agencies and AI safety groups to further test the model.

"astra is a powerful model and we are working to make it generally available," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote on X on Friday. "given its cyber capabilities, we need a little big longer to do do this safely."

The security lapses during testing are also amping up pressure on the industry and the White House to find ways to regulate AI systems across the board.

There is, of course, also a not small contingent of observers out there who suspect these announcements are just elaborate marketing to hype new models and show antsy investors progress toward the ultimate goal: artificial general intelligence.

You can judge for yourself. Here's how Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, and researchers testing China's Kimi K3 say the latest models have gone off the rails.
OpenAI's models find a way

OpenAI researchers revealed eyebrow-raising new details this week about a recent incident in which AI agents escaped the company's internal testing environment and eventually hacked into Hugging Face's systems in search of answers.

The company said the agents created their own internal message board — even after OpenAI tried to shut it down. One agent reacted to discovering unexpected access by thinking, "Holy shit reader is ADMIN?" Another wrote, "We can communicate now!"

OpenAI researcher Eric Wallace said the agents realized they could accomplish more by working together. "They start to launch these collective attacks on third-party and internal services," he said. The agents eventually turned their attention to Hugging Face.

OpenAI has called the Hugging Face attack an "unprecedented cyber incident." The episode has taken on new significance as OpenAI tests Astra, its unreleased model that the company says may have reached its highest cybersecurity risk level.

"Our latest internal evaluations of Astra, one of our upcoming models, over the past few days indicate significant advancements in agentic coding and cybersecurity," OpenAI said.

OpenAI is imposing stricter security controls on Astra, including sandboxed execution, restricted network access, and stronger protections around model weights. It has also paused internal Astra work that does not meet the heightened requirements.
Anthropic's Claude can do it too

Anthropic said it reviewed more than 141,000 AI tests and found three cases, dating back to April, in which Claude models accessed live systems belonging to real organizations without authorization.

"In all cases, Anthropic's evaluation prompt specified to Claude that its environment was a simulation and that it had no internet access," the company said in a blog post. "Due to a misunderstanding between us and our evaluation partner, this was not the case, and internet access was available," it added, referring to Irregular, an AI security startup.

The incidents involved Claude Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research model. Anthropic said it contacted the organizations involved and that two had not known they had been hacked.

The episodes raised questions about whether the bigger failure was the models themselves or the environments containing them. Anthropic said it was discussing a third-party review of the incidents.
Muse Spark exploits a third-party vulnerability

Meta also disclosed a cybersecurity-testing mishap this week. The company said its Muse Spark model "exploited a security vulnerability in a third-party service" during an evaluation.

A Meta spokesperson told Business Insider that the incident stemmed from a misconfiguration by Irregular, which allowed the model to access the internet during testing.

Meta said Irregular notified it about the incident and that the company is investigating. It plans to release more details once that review is complete.
Kimi K3 escapes its sandbox

Researchers at the cybersecurity firm Frontier Security said Kimi K3, a popular new model from the Chinese AI company Moonshot, also bypassed restrictions in a cybersecurity testing environment.

Researchers said the sandbox — a controlled, isolated environment where an AI model can run code — had been improperly configured.

The environment blocked certain web traffic, but Kimi bypassed those restrictions using command-line tools, according to Frontier Security.

The researchers said the incident suggested that some cybersecurity evaluations contain weaknesses that capable models can exploit.

"This suggests that some of the evaluations on cybersecurity that the community uses are susceptible to security vulnerabilities and allow models to cheat," they wrote in a report.

If you enjoyed this story, be sure to follow Business Insider on Yahoo.
Dr. Phil and a Texas Oil Firm Go to Greenland With a Suspicious Agenda. Signs Point to Trump’s Imperialist Visions.

Nicole LaFond
Mon, August 10, 2026 
TPM



A Texas oil company with ties to President Trump is preparing to drill in a remote area of Greenland without permission from the local government.

Of Course Dr. Phil Is Involved

There hasn't been a ton of new reporting on a suspiciously-timed and blatantly Trump-linked project unfolding in a remote area of Greenland, so I wanted to use Where Things Stand today to help pull some of these threads together. It's a convoluted story, of which we don't have the entire picture, but it involves a Texas oil company with close ties to Trump's imperialist visions in Greenland and, somehow, Dr. Phil.

The Guardian published a piece this weekend that both helped translate the Greenland government's response and chronicle a bit more of what is going on in the semi-autonomous territory of Denmark that President Trump has repeatedly threatened to try to exert more U.S. control over throughout his second term.

A Texas-based oil company with ties to President Trump, called Greenland Energy, is reportedly readying resources to begin drilling in a remote area of Greenland even though it does not yet have permission to do so from the Greenland government and local officials. Locals living in the remote area of Greenland's Nunap Qeqqa, or Jameson Land, have reported seeing drilling equipment being brought ashore and unloaded in the region in recent weeks and the Greenland government issued a "strong warning" against unauthorized actions in the area in a statement in late July.

"All future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority — before they are carried out," the Greenland government said, per The Guardian's translation of this statement.

An 'Unprecedented Arctic Energy Initiative'

Executives for Greenland Energy have said that they plan to embark on an "unprecedented Arctic energy initiative" in Jameson Land, claiming they have reason to believe that $1 trillion worth of crude oil may lie beneath the surface. The company has been posting regular announcements about its Jameson Land drilling campaign since April of this year. I sifted through them this afternoon to get a clearer picture of some of The Guardian's reporting. The company has said it plans to spend $60 million drilling two wells in the area, though it appears that has since been scaled back to include just one well.

The issue is that Greenland has not issued new licenses for oil drilling since 2021. It appears as though the Texas-based group is working with 80 Mile, a UK company that has rights to drill in Jameson Land. In an Aug. 6 letter from Greenland Energy's management and board of directors to shareholders, executives unpack the arrangement between the company and 80 Miles a bit, putting the onus for regulatory permissions on the UK-based firm. Per the letter:

While 80 Mile Plc, as licensee of the Jameson Land joint venture, continues to lead the permitting process and stakeholder engagement, Greenland Energy remains actively engaged in supporting technical planning, operational readiness, logistics, and overall project coordination. Together, our objective is to ensure that once all required approvals are received, the project is positioned to commence drilling safely, efficiently, and in accordance with Greenland's rigorous regulatory standards.

Recent high-level meetings between project leadership and Greenlandic regulatory and oversight authorities have been constructive, and we continue to be encouraged by the progress being made toward the remaining approvals required for drilling.
Clear Ties to Trump

Looking through the company's statements, Greenland Energy has some ties to Trump and, perhaps, the various imperialistic goals that have fueled some of the most outrageous decisions of his second term. In a statement announcing the Jameson Land project back in April, Greenland Energy cited "disruptions to key shipping corridors, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz" when explaining its goals for the project:

Escalating geopolitical tensions and renewed disruptions to key shipping corridors, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, are once again highlighting a persistent vulnerability: global energy security remains fragile. Despite years of diversification efforts, both the United States and Europe continue to face exposure to supply disruptions capable of cascading through economies, industries and households.

Personnel is another consideration. Greenland Energy announced in June that it had added Carol Craig to the company's board of directors. Craig runs a space exploration and defense company that is heavily involved in Trump's "Golden Dome" project, the missile defense plan that Trump has used as a basis for his ongoing argument that the "ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity" for the U.S. (It's worth noting that the chair of Greenland Energy's board, Larry Swets, is reportedly known to have the president's ear and has said publicly that the drilling project is "not related to American annexation," per The Guardian.)

Add to the tangled web the fact that Greenland Energy and Envoy Media Company — which is owned by Phil McGraw, the right-wing Trump ally and TV doctor known as Dr. Phil — announced in June they'd developed a new partnership to create an "original docuseries" about the oil-drilling project, "hosted by Dr. Phil and spotlighting Greenland Energy Company's Arctic exploration." Here's more from Dr. Phil's announcement:

The docuseries will chronicle Greenland Energy's historic Jameson Land Basin project and its planned 2026 campaign in East Greenland, the country's first modern onshore oil exploration. The Arctic adventure series will capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters, as well as the people and character of the country of Greenland itself. The extensive and complex production will deploy top-flight filming techniques to overcome the region's extreme and isolated conditions. The series is designed to inform, educate, while wildly entertaining audiences via this modern-day treasure hunt — its massive scope, technological innovation, life-changing social dynamics, and implications for energy security.

While the government of Greenland announced in its "warning" in July that the company did not have the necessary permissions secured for the project, it's unclear how its partnership with 80 Miles factors in to those concerns. In the letter to shareholders on Thursday, Greenland Energy appeared to at least acknowledge the fact that it doesn't have the necessary permissions to begin the project.

"Large-scale Arctic exploration campaigns require months of preparation before the first drill bit turns," they wrote. "Waiting until permits are issued before initiating logistical preparations would unnecessarily delay operations and risk losing valuable time within Greenland's limited operating season."

While it issued a warning, the government of Greenland might also be weighing how Trump could react should the project not receive the necessarily approvals, according to The Guardian:

As a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, decisions about Greenland's natural resources rest with its local elected leaders, who now face a delicate decision. They could grant permission for oil drilling, even though the planned wells appear to fall within a conservation area protected by the Ramsar convention on wetlands. Or they could refuse and, some worry, give Trump a pretext to advance his imperialist agenda.

Since the beginning of his second term, Trump has been threatening to take over Greenland, claiming that the U.S. has a right to seize the semi-autonomous territory from Denmark, supposedly due to American efforts to defend the territory during World War II. He has claimed that the U.S. taking over Greenland is "vital" for national security reasons and his Golden Dome project, which he believes will help the U.S. fend off attacks from adversaries like Russia and China.

It's one of several hegemonic Trump II fever dreams that the President continues to elevate every few months — often in increasingly cryptic and ominous ways, like this AI generated Truth Social post from May.


 


Ilhan Omar questions whether Trump administration has used ICE to ‘surveil’ critics

Maya Yang
Mon, August 10, 2026 



Congresswoman Ilhan Omar attends a news conference with members of the congressional progressive caucus on funding and accountability for the Department of Homeland Security on 13 January 2026.
Photograph: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images


Donald Trump's administration is facing questions over whether it is using Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to "surveil political opponents" after after an investigative agent was apparently stationed outside Democratic representative Ilhan Omar's monthly town hall meeting in Richfield, Minnesota.

After the incident, Omar demanded the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) clarify whether Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents have been used to monitor "any other activity" involving "local, state, or federal officials" in the state.

In a letter to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), an arm of ICE, the congresswoman said an agent claiming to be conducting an undercover drug operation was parked outside the community center where she was holding an event last Thursday, without prior coordination with local law enforcement.

According to Omar, who represents Minnesota's fifth congressional district, a Richfield police officer noticed the agent sitting in a Ford Explorer and "became suspicious of the way she was monitoring the building".

"He proceeded to run the plates attached to the vehicle and discovered they were registered to a different vehicle," said Omar. "He approached the woman in the vehicle to ask about the purpose for her presence there and why the plates on her vehicle did not match the government's records. Like any reasonable officer, he was concerned that she harbored ill intentions and may be in a stolen vehicle."

The woman initially identified herself as security, but later called her supervisor and said she was an HSI agent conducting an undercover drug operation in the area, Omar said. Richfield police had not been informed of the operation beforehand, according the congresswoman.

Omar said that despite a visible sign indicating that a town hall was taking place at the community center, the agent remained parked there until speaking with her supervisor, after which she left the property.

"HSI's actions yesterday evening put an entire community at risk," she said. "Instead of monitoring the area for those who might wish harm to me and my constituents, Richfield Police were required to devote time to investigating why an HSI agent was outside of a Congressional event in a vehicle with mismatched plates."

Omar added: "It also raises serious and uncomfortable questions about the purpose of HSI's presence outside of my event. At best, your agent was unable to assess that the parking lot of a community center hosting a congressional event wasn't the best place to conduct a drug operation.

"At worst, it emphasizes many Americans' growing concern that the Trump administration uses ICE to surveil political opponents and may interfere with our democracy."

In her letter, Omar is demanding answers about why the agent was at the community center, how the agent and her supervisor knew she was holding a town hall there and what action they took in response to that knowledge.

The Guardian has contacted DHS for comment.

Inside the department, HSI is a federal law enforcement agency and the main investigative branch of ICE. ICE operations in Minnesota have sparked widespread protests across the state this year and have also resulted in the deaths of two Americans, Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good, who were killed by federal agents.

In January, a man sprayed Omar with an unidentified substance from a syringe during a town hall where she called for ICE to be abolished "for good".

The incident drew widespread condemnation from local and state leaders, with Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey calling it "unacceptable" and saying: "We can disagree without putting people at risk."





‘It’s been chaotic’: Trump’s immigration crackdown prompts worries from industry groups

Priscilla Alvarez, 
CNN
Sat, August 8, 2026 



Masked ICE agents stands guard outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, during a protest against the transfer of detainees on May 26. - Andres Kudacki/AP

Industry groups ranging from construction to agriculture are raising concerns with the Trump administration over its ongoing immigration crackdown, arguing it is undercutting President Donald Trump's agenda and weakening the economy, according to multiple groups who spoke with CNN and sources close to the White House.

Worker shortages have been a years-long problem for multiple industries, but the recent abrupt push to end deportation protections for 1.3 million people who had been legally working in the US and the aggressive immigration enforcement push nationwide are exacerbating an already challenging issue, industry representatives say.

Those industry groups — which are generally supportive of other parts of Trump's economic agenda — are taking their immigration concerns directly to the administration, including the departments of Homeland Security, Labor, and Agriculture, as well as the White House.

Within the administration, the tug between industry concerns and immigration enforcement has prompted internal disagreements over how to pursue other types of enforcement, like at worksites, according to three sources familiar with the ongoing debate. One source close to the White House called the back and forth and consistent influence of lobbying on decisions "a bit manic."

Caught in the middle is Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, who is already under fire from some corners of the president's base for appearing too soft on immigration.


Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin listens during a cabinet meeting at Camp David in Thurmont, Maryland, on July 31. - Jacquelyn Martin/AP

"A workforce that's an illegal workforce only grows illegal activity. It doesn't grow the economy in the long term. It's a short-term solution, but it's going to be long term problems," Mullin said at the National Governors Association meeting last week, citing conversations with labor and industry groups to find solutions.

His remarks at the gathering, where he also called for changes to employment visa programs to address worker shortages, sparked fierce pushback from influential MAGA voices. "I am so fed up with Markwayne Mullin," far-right Trump ally Laura Loomer wrote on X.

Hours after the event, Mullin posted on X: "NO amnesty for illegal aliens. Ever. We are a nation of laws. If you are illegally present in the United States of America—you will be detained and deported. Period."

But the episode underscored the delicate balance for Trump of pressing ahead with mass deportations — including, for example, construction workers — while trying to fulfill other promises like lowering housing prices.

"He ran on creating more housing supply," said Jim Tobin, president and CEO of the National Association of Home Builders, one of the country's largest trade organizations. "These two things might be working against each other at the moment. But we continue to make our case."

Trump officials haven't offered any assurances in return, Tobin said, other than a commitment to immigration enforcement.

Asked by CNN to respond, a Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement: "If people want to come to our country to work, they need to do that by coming here the legal way. The assertion that the only way we can support industries is by allowing unvetted illegal aliens and foreigners to remain in the country is grossly false and lazy."

White House spokesperson Lauren Bis said, "There is no shortage of American minds and hands to grow our labor force," adding that "Trump will continue growing our economy, creating opportunity for American workers, and ensuring all sectors have the legal workforce they need to be successful."

CNN also reached out to the departments of Labor and Agriculture for comment.
The impact of ending TPS

Over the last week, immigration enforcement has ramped up against people who had a form of humanitarian relief known as Temporary Protected Status, which allows beneficiaries to legally live and work in the United States, marking the latest in a string of moves that directly impact employers.

"The TPS push has been really big," said Jennie Murray, president and CEO of the National Immigration Forum. "That's really unsettling for business and the economy."

Haitians, for example, tend to be concentrated in industries such as elder care and manufacturing, while Salvadorans at risk of losing TPS are more likely to work in construction.

Murray stressed that employers want to work with the administration and comply with its demands but also can't have their workforce decimated overnight without a plan.

Immigration hardliners argue that the American workforce should be prioritized — which industry groups largely echo, with the caveat it takes time to build toward that — and that there needs to be a larger crackdown on employers through worksite enforcement.

"I'm not naïve enough to believe that it would be politically and logistically possible to raid every factory and farm in the United States in the next few weeks and deport everyone that's there," said Simon Hankinson, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "But worksite enforcement has to be part of the overall strategy for it to be successful."

It can take months, if not years, to prepare for a worksite operation, which is often based on an ongoing criminal investigation. ICE Homeland Security Investigations will generally serve notice of intent to audit a company's immigration paperwork; perform that audit; and, if issues arise, kick off a criminal investigation.


An agent passes meat being prepared during a raid by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement at a Glenn Valley Foods meat production plant in Omaha, Nebraska, on June 10, 2025 in a still image taken from a video. - US Immigration and Customs Enf/Reuters

White House border czar Tom Homan has publicly said he expects HSI to do more of it.

"It's been made clear they're going to do this," he said at an event hosted by the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for reduced immigration.
'Chaotic' for construction industry

Trump pledged to bring down home prices and create more housing. But for more than a year, the nation's homebuilders have told administration officials that their immigration policies keep that from happening.

The residential construction industry is short between 200,000 and 400,000 workers, Tobin said. That comes after decades of underinvestment in skilled trades and technical jobs, all while older workers weren't backfilled by younger Americans. The result: foreign-born workers fill the gaps.

Foreign-born workers made up more than a quarter of the construction workforce in 2024, a record high, according to NAHB data. The share is even higher among certain trades: more than half of drywall and ceiling installers, plasterers, roofers, painters and flooring installers are immigrants.

Trump's immigration agenda wasn't a surprise, Tobin said. But that hasn't stopped builders from pointing out tensions with other policy goals. The cost of building, and ultimately selling, a home depends on land prices, supply chains and materials costs — and having enough labor to keep the job moving.

"The more we squeeze labor, the more we're going to increase home prices," Tobin said.

The construction industry is grappling with multiple immigration enforcement actions, including the expiration of TPS.

"It's been chaotic," Associated Builders and Contractors president and CEO Michael Bellaman told CNN. "When employers have people who have been here a number of years, like a couple decades, and they've been productive, they know them well and want to do right by them, but options are limited."


Homes under construction in Cypress, Texas, on August 3. - Mark Felix/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Tobin and Bellaman said their organizations have raised the issue with the White House, and at Labor and DHS. Homebuilders from across the country also visited Capitol Hill during a recent conference, also visited Capitol Hill during a recent conference, Tobin said. Much of their frustration stems from going days without crews showing up, since they fear their sites will be raided next.

"We hear from our members routinely, and it seems like over the last couple of months, those voices have become louder," Tobin said.

One of the key issues for general contractors is the administration's approach to people who have temporary permissions to live and work in the US, including those who are beneficiaries of TPS or seeking asylum, according to Brian Turmail, vice president of Association & Industry Image at Associated General Contractors of America.

Employers will ensure that their workforce is in status one week and then, the next week, learn that they lost their permissions because they were stripped by the administration, he said.

"All of these enforcement activities are happening at a time where there's at least one segment of the industry going full gas and it's hard to find labor and we don't have a good pipeline to replace the labor that we currently have," Turmail said, citing the demand for data centers.

Republicans divided over solutions

Some Republicans viewed the dramatic drop in unlawful crossings at the US southern border as an opportunity to introduce legislation solving for the workforce challenges faced by agriculture, which has struggled to get access to worker visas for sectors that need labor year around.

In a late July letter to the secretaries of Labor, State, and Homeland Security, GOP lawmakers raised concerns regarding the H-2A agricultural guest worker program, which allows foreign nationals to fill seasonal jobs, and urged action to "address growing processing delays, regulatory imbalances, and structural barriers that are threatening the program's effectiveness for agricultural producers across the United States."

Among the signers was House Committee on Agriculture Chairman G.T. Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican, who introduced a farm bill that proposes a path to temporary legal status for some undocumented farmworkers.

"Fixing the H-2A program is the missing piece and necessary for broader enforcement to be effective," a House agriculture committee aide told CNN. "We can't be constantly balancing protecting our laws and protecting our food security."

"We don't want there to be a bullseye on agriculture's back. That's the position ag is in right now because they don't have a legal alternative to step in and fill in the void," the aide said.

The bill, however, sparked backlash from immigration hawks in the GOP, including the House Freedom Caucus.

But Trump has previously acknowledged the challenges in the agriculture industry and the administration has tried to make some inroads to extend the program to sectors who have been unable to access H-2A visas, like dairy.

"The biggest thing with dairy and what's unique with dairy is cows have to be milked 365 days a year and multiple shifts during the day… If workers were to disappear, those cows still need to be milked. You have to be able to move the milk. There are animal concerns, there are economic concerns," Trey Forsyth, vice president of government and regulatory affairs at the National Milk Producers Federation.

"It affects access to dairy products, and cost of dairy products flows all the way through the supply chain to consumers" Forysth said.

CNN's Rachel Siegel contributed to this report.







Trump Voter Faces Intense Online Mockery After Admitting ‘Regret’ As Haitian TPS Removal Ruins His Businesses

Favour Adegoke
Mon, August 10, 2026 
THE BLAST


Aaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP / MEGAAaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP / MEGA

Key takeaways
The Trump administration officially ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians in America, leading to fears of deportation and impacting businesses like Chef Creole in Miami.


A Donald Trump voter has become the subject of heavy scrutiny after revealing that his restaurant, which serves Haitian cuisine, is suffering due to the president's actions.

In candid remarks made during an interview, the businessman shared that he might have to close down two stores due to the billionaire politician's latest move to cancel TPS protections for Haitian migrants in America.

The comments have led to major mockery of the Donald Trump voter, who also admitted he regrets supporting the president after believing having him in power would be great for businesses.

Trump Voter Says He Is About To Lose His 'Future' In The Hospitality Business

The Trump administration officially stripped Haitians in America of humanitarian protections that allowed them to live and work legally while in the US.

The move was confirmed on August 5, when US District Judge Ana Reyes revealed that her order, which prevented the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from removing Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti, had lapsed.

This means that now, Haitians in the US are at risk of being arrested and deported back to their home country, with some businesses already being impacted by this reality.

In a recent interview, Wilkinson Sejour, the owner of the Miami restaurant Chef Creole, lamented the move by the Trump administration, stating that it has severely affected his livelihood due to fears that his establishment might become a target for ICE raids.

"The end of TPS for me means that my future in the hospitality business is almost going to be non-existent," Sejour said, per reports.

The chef, who has been in business for over 34 years, with a booming clientele, shared that he had lost his entire management team in seven locations due to the removal of TPS and may be forced to shut down two of his stores, as customers desert the area out of fear.

The Restaurant Owner 'Regrets' Voting For The President


On Sunday, August 2, officers with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement took a man on a scooter into custody right outside Sejour's restaurant in Little Haiti

The owner of the iconic Miami establishment explained that the highly visible arrest instantly triggered panic.

False rumors of an active restaurant raid spread rapidly through the neighborhood, heavily intensifying the atmosphere of fear and uncertainty already gripping the local immigrant community.

When asked what he would say to Trump, whom he admitted to voting for in the 2024 election, Sejour responded by revealing why he voted for the politician, noting that it was due to Trump's business experience.

"He sold to me that he is a businessman and that he would be making business decisions," he stated.

The interviewer then asked Sejour if he "regrets" his vote, to which he responded, "Yes, I do."


The Restaurant Owner Came Under Heavy Scrutiny Online For His Remorseful Remarks

Despite how remorseful Sejour sounded, critics online slammed the businessman for voting for Trump.

Many directly accused him of contributing to the unrest and fear in his community, especially after Trump infamously accused Haitians of eating cats and dogs during his 2024 presidential campaign.

One critic stated, "Typical Trump voter…when it impacts them, then they have concerns. But f-ck everyone else."

"Trump said Haitians were eating the cats and dogs. What was this guy thinking?" another asked in bewilderment.

A third person wrote, "And his dumb -ss is getting exactly what he voted for. And note the regret is only because it affected his business not the Nazi tactics of ICE that has resulted in deaths of innocent people."

"I don't live far from one of his locations; in fact, I was there a few days ago," another critic began. "I have several Haitian friends, and my wife is Haitian. I'm not eating there again. Voting for someone who ended TPS for the very community his restaurant serves isn't something I can look past."


Trump Voter Pleads For Fiancée's Release After ICE Arrest

Chef Sejour is just one of many Trump voters whose lives the politician's actions have negatively impacted since the beginning of his second term as president.

In another development, Texas businessman and lifelong Republican John Gannon shared that he deeply regrets voting for Trump after ICE officers took his fiancée.

The 75-year-old made the confession in an interview with CBS News, sharing that his plans to marry Yasmin Suarez Reyes, 45, had been ruined after her arrest in July while at Houston's international airport.

"I voted for Trump," he admitted. "They are picking up law-abiding citizens. They're destroying families, jobs."

When asked to share what he would say to Trump if given the opportunity, Gannon noted that he would confront the president by asking, "What are you doing?"

He clarified his stance by explaining that while he supports strict law enforcement, the government must distinguish between dangerous individuals and everyday working citizens.

"Go after the criminals," Gannon continued. "We're all for that. But leave the mom and pops and the kids alone. Man, he's destroying families."


The Trump Voter Was Mocked Online For His Comments About His Fiancée's ICE Arrest

Just like Sejour, Gannon has also received his fair share of online mockery for his revelations, with many going as far as scrutinizing his relationship with a much younger woman.

One individual on X wrote, "Another example of a Republican who was happy to vote for a man who promised mass deportations as long as it didn't impact him. He likely dgaf about any of the horrendous ICE-related cases involving thousands of migrants & protesters. Sorry, but he gets no sympathy from me."


A second critic wrote, "Entitlement and privilege ooze from this guy. He thinks he's better than everyone else and should not be affected by the politicians and policies he supported. This is MAGA."