London (AFP) – UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Tuesday seeks to avoid a humiliating defeat for his latest plans to send migrants to Rwanda that have split his ruling Conservative party.
Issued on: 12/12/2023 -
Rishi Sunak is facing a key challenge to his authority over his immigration plans
© James Manning / POOL/AFP
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill is Sunak's answer to a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last month that deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda was illegal in international law.
It aims to legislate to address the court's concerns, as part of a government bid to cut record levels of regular and irregular immigration that is likely to be a key issue at next year's election.
But by seeking to declare Rwanda safe -- despite concerns from human rights monitors -- and removing legal challenges to deportation orders, he has triggered deep factional Tory in-fighting not seen since wrangling over what form Brexit should take.
Hardline right-wingers say the proposals are not tough enough, while more liberal Tories are concerned it could see the UK break international law if the proposals are amended down the line.
A parliamentary debate will start from about 1230 GMT, with a vote expected at 1900 GMT, with all eyes on votes against and abstentions, in what is being seen as a key test of Sunak's leadership.
Defeat would not only be the first at such an early stage of the parliamentary process since 1986 but also a blow to his authority, just over a year since he became Tory leader.
Sunak should call a general election if he loses the vote, opposition Labour leader Keir Starmer said in a speech on Tuesday, but added: "It'll go through tonight, I don't doubt."
Breakfast meeting
Sunak, who is well behind opposition Labour in the polls, has made controlling immigration one of his key policies.
In a bid to appease opponents Tuesday he invited potential rebels for breakfast at Downing Street to get them to back the bill -- or risk it falling at the first hurdle.
"Take back control" was a mantra for Brexit supporters like Sunak during the 2016 referendum.
But Tory governments have found the reality of policing UK borders since leaving the European Union more problematic.
The UK-Rwanda deportation plan was first announced by Sunak's successor Boris Johnson last year as a way of dealing with increasing numbers of migrants crossing the Channel from France in small boats.
Starmer called the policy, which has already seen the UK pay Rwanda some £240 million ($300 million), a "perfect example" of the "cultural stain that runs through the modern Conservative Party".
"Not a single person has been sent and even if we did send people, we would pay for their hotels and upkeep.
"And we'd have to resettle refugees from Rwanda in exchange. That's the deal that they are voting on today," he said.
Net migration -- the difference between the number of people arriving and those leaving -- stood at a record 750,000 last year.
Sunak's government has since announced plans including higher minimum salaries for economic migrants, and restrictions on accompanying family to cut numbers, prompting widespread criticism.
But it also wants to cut asylum applications due to a backlog of cases from "small boats" crossings, blaming them for adding pressure and an estimated £8 million-a-day cost on public services.
© 2023 AFP
Sunak faces parliamentary test as he rallies support for Rwanda migration bill
Issued on: 12/12/2023
01:32
Video by:FRANCE 24
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faces the biggest parliamentary test of his premiership on Tuesday when lawmakers vote on his flagship migration policy of sending asylum seekers who arrive illegally in Britain to Rwanda. Sunak is seeking to revive his key plan after the UK Supreme Court ruled last month that Rwanda was an unsafe place to send those arriving in small boats on England's southern coast, concluding it would breach British and international law.
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill is Sunak's answer to a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last month that deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda was illegal in international law.
It aims to legislate to address the court's concerns, as part of a government bid to cut record levels of regular and irregular immigration that is likely to be a key issue at next year's election.
But by seeking to declare Rwanda safe -- despite concerns from human rights monitors -- and removing legal challenges to deportation orders, he has triggered deep factional Tory in-fighting not seen since wrangling over what form Brexit should take.
Hardline right-wingers say the proposals are not tough enough, while more liberal Tories are concerned it could see the UK break international law if the proposals are amended down the line.
A parliamentary debate will start from about 1230 GMT, with a vote expected at 1900 GMT, with all eyes on votes against and abstentions, in what is being seen as a key test of Sunak's leadership.
Defeat would not only be the first at such an early stage of the parliamentary process since 1986 but also a blow to his authority, just over a year since he became Tory leader.
Sunak should call a general election if he loses the vote, opposition Labour leader Keir Starmer said in a speech on Tuesday, but added: "It'll go through tonight, I don't doubt."
Breakfast meeting
Sunak, who is well behind opposition Labour in the polls, has made controlling immigration one of his key policies.
In a bid to appease opponents Tuesday he invited potential rebels for breakfast at Downing Street to get them to back the bill -- or risk it falling at the first hurdle.
"Take back control" was a mantra for Brexit supporters like Sunak during the 2016 referendum.
But Tory governments have found the reality of policing UK borders since leaving the European Union more problematic.
The UK-Rwanda deportation plan was first announced by Sunak's successor Boris Johnson last year as a way of dealing with increasing numbers of migrants crossing the Channel from France in small boats.
Starmer called the policy, which has already seen the UK pay Rwanda some £240 million ($300 million), a "perfect example" of the "cultural stain that runs through the modern Conservative Party".
"Not a single person has been sent and even if we did send people, we would pay for their hotels and upkeep.
"And we'd have to resettle refugees from Rwanda in exchange. That's the deal that they are voting on today," he said.
Net migration -- the difference between the number of people arriving and those leaving -- stood at a record 750,000 last year.
Sunak's government has since announced plans including higher minimum salaries for economic migrants, and restrictions on accompanying family to cut numbers, prompting widespread criticism.
But it also wants to cut asylum applications due to a backlog of cases from "small boats" crossings, blaming them for adding pressure and an estimated £8 million-a-day cost on public services.
© 2023 AFP
UK PM Sunak faces leadership test over Rwanda plan
London (AFP) – UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Tuesday sought to avoid a humiliating defeat for his latest plans to send migrants to Rwanda that have split his ruling Conservative party.
Issued on: 12/12/2023
London (AFP) – UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Tuesday sought to avoid a humiliating defeat for his latest plans to send migrants to Rwanda that have split his ruling Conservative party.
Issued on: 12/12/2023
The Rwanda bill is a key test of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's authority
© Leon Neal / POOL/AFP
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill is Sunak's answer to a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last month that deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda was illegal in international law.
Interior minister James Cleverly admitted the plans were "novel" and "pushing at the edge of the envelope" but addressed the court's concerns.
Extreme action was needed to break the business model of "evil people-smuggling gangs" preying on the vulnerable, he told MPs before a debate and crunch vote on the proposals.
"This is lawful, this is fair, this is necessary... This is how we restore confidence in our immigration and take control of our borders," he said.
The bill is part of wider government action to cut record levels of regular and irregular immigration that is likely to be a key issue at next year's election.
But by seeking to declare Rwanda safe -- despite concerns from human rights monitors -- and removing legal challenges to deportation orders, Sunak has triggered deep factional Tory infighting not seen since wrangling over what form Brexit should take.
Hardline right-wingers say the proposals are not tough enough, while more liberal Tories are concerned they could see the UK break international law if they are amended down the line.
Defeat would not only be the first at such an early stage of the parliamentary process since 1986 but also a blow to Sunak's authority, just over a year since he became Tory leader.
Opposition Labour leader Keir Starmer said he expected the government to win the vote but Sunak should call a general election if he loses.
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill is Sunak's answer to a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last month that deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda was illegal in international law.
Interior minister James Cleverly admitted the plans were "novel" and "pushing at the edge of the envelope" but addressed the court's concerns.
Extreme action was needed to break the business model of "evil people-smuggling gangs" preying on the vulnerable, he told MPs before a debate and crunch vote on the proposals.
"This is lawful, this is fair, this is necessary... This is how we restore confidence in our immigration and take control of our borders," he said.
The bill is part of wider government action to cut record levels of regular and irregular immigration that is likely to be a key issue at next year's election.
But by seeking to declare Rwanda safe -- despite concerns from human rights monitors -- and removing legal challenges to deportation orders, Sunak has triggered deep factional Tory infighting not seen since wrangling over what form Brexit should take.
Hardline right-wingers say the proposals are not tough enough, while more liberal Tories are concerned they could see the UK break international law if they are amended down the line.
Defeat would not only be the first at such an early stage of the parliamentary process since 1986 but also a blow to Sunak's authority, just over a year since he became Tory leader.
Opposition Labour leader Keir Starmer said he expected the government to win the vote but Sunak should call a general election if he loses.
Sunak invited Conservative right-wingers to Downing Street to try to get them to back the bill
© Adrian DENNIS / AFP
UK climate minister Graham Stuart was called back to vote from the critical last-stage talks at the COP28 summit in Dubai, sparking fury from green campaigners.
Breakfast meeting
Sunak, who is well behind Labour in the polls, has staked his political reputation on controlling immigration as one of his key policies.
In a bid to appease opponents Tuesday, he invited potential rebels for breakfast at Downing Street to get them to back the bill -- or risk it falling at the first hurdle.
"Take back control" was a mantra for Brexit supporters like Sunak during the 2016 referendum on European Union membership.
But Tory governments have found the reality of policing UK borders since leaving the EU in full in 2021 more problematic.
The UK-Rwanda deportation plan was first announced by Sunak's predecessor Boris Johnson last year as a way of dealing with increasing numbers of migrants crossing the Channel from France in small boats.
Labour's interior affairs spokeswoman Yvette Cooper said £240 million ($300 million) had already been spent without a single migrant being sent to Rwanda, with £150 million more promised by 2026.
UK climate minister Graham Stuart was called back to vote from the critical last-stage talks at the COP28 summit in Dubai, sparking fury from green campaigners.
Breakfast meeting
Sunak, who is well behind Labour in the polls, has staked his political reputation on controlling immigration as one of his key policies.
In a bid to appease opponents Tuesday, he invited potential rebels for breakfast at Downing Street to get them to back the bill -- or risk it falling at the first hurdle.
"Take back control" was a mantra for Brexit supporters like Sunak during the 2016 referendum on European Union membership.
But Tory governments have found the reality of policing UK borders since leaving the EU in full in 2021 more problematic.
The UK-Rwanda deportation plan was first announced by Sunak's predecessor Boris Johnson last year as a way of dealing with increasing numbers of migrants crossing the Channel from France in small boats.
Labour's interior affairs spokeswoman Yvette Cooper said £240 million ($300 million) had already been spent without a single migrant being sent to Rwanda, with £150 million more promised by 2026.
The government confirmed that one asylum seeker died on the Bibby Stockholm accommodation barge houses that critics have called a prison ship
© Andrew Matthews / POOL/AFP
She called it a "gimmick" that would have minimal impact on numbers and urged the government to instead tackle the lengthy asylum backlog, which is costing some £8 million a day to UK taxpayers.
"You cannot make Rwanda safe just by saying it," added her colleague, Chris Bryant, a former member of parliament's foreign affairs committee.
Net migration -- the difference between the number of people arriving and those leaving -- stood at a record 750,000 last year.
Sunak's government has since announced plans including higher minimum salaries for economic migrants, and restrictions on accompanying family to cut numbers, prompting widespread criticism.
But it also wants to cut asylum applications due to a backlog of cases from "small boats" crossings, blaming them for adding pressure on public services.
One provision of the bill is to house migrants deemed to have arrived illegally in purpose-built detention centres, to ease accommodation pressures.
Cleverly also confirmed the sudden death of an asylum seeker on an accommodation barge docked off southwest England that critics have compared to a prison ship.
No further details were immediately available but Care4Calais chief executive Steve Smith accused the government of inflicting further trauma on migrants.
© 2023 AFP
She called it a "gimmick" that would have minimal impact on numbers and urged the government to instead tackle the lengthy asylum backlog, which is costing some £8 million a day to UK taxpayers.
"You cannot make Rwanda safe just by saying it," added her colleague, Chris Bryant, a former member of parliament's foreign affairs committee.
Net migration -- the difference between the number of people arriving and those leaving -- stood at a record 750,000 last year.
Sunak's government has since announced plans including higher minimum salaries for economic migrants, and restrictions on accompanying family to cut numbers, prompting widespread criticism.
But it also wants to cut asylum applications due to a backlog of cases from "small boats" crossings, blaming them for adding pressure on public services.
One provision of the bill is to house migrants deemed to have arrived illegally in purpose-built detention centres, to ease accommodation pressures.
Cleverly also confirmed the sudden death of an asylum seeker on an accommodation barge docked off southwest England that critics have compared to a prison ship.
No further details were immediately available but Care4Calais chief executive Steve Smith accused the government of inflicting further trauma on migrants.
© 2023 AFP
Sunak faces parliamentary test as he rallies support for Rwanda migration bill
Issued on: 12/12/2023
01:32Video by:FRANCE 24
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faces the biggest parliamentary test of his premiership on Tuesday when lawmakers vote on his flagship migration policy of sending asylum seekers who arrive illegally in Britain to Rwanda. Sunak is seeking to revive his key plan after the UK Supreme Court ruled last month that Rwanda was an unsafe place to send those arriving in small boats on England's southern coast, concluding it would breach British and international law.
No comments:
Post a Comment