Showing posts sorted by date for query dark energy. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query dark energy. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2026

SPACE/COSMOS

How to design a space habitat that supports its residents’ mental health


A new online platform helps engineers look beyond survival mode when designing habitats for extreme living conditions


Massachusetts Institute of Technology


  • Researchers from MIT and other institutions have developed a new interactive online platform called the Human-Environment Connection and Interaction Atlas (HECIA) that is a tool for designing habitats in space and other extreme environments that allow crews to not just survive but thrive. 
  • Users can explore the relationships between aspects of a habitat’s design and an inhabitant’s mental, emotional, and social wellbeing.

Cambridge, Mass. -- In extreme environments, habitats are built for survival. Submarines, Antarctic bases, and post disaster dwellings are designed to prioritize health and safety. This is especially the case for habitats in space, where room is at a minimum, contact with Earth is remote, and hazards are numerous. 

But as humans plan for longer journeys to the moon and eventually Mars, designing habitats where crews can not only survive but also thrive will be essential to a mission’s success.

Now, engineers at MIT and elsewhere are exploring ways that habitats in extreme environments can support a person’s mental, emotional, and social wellbeing. They have assembled a resource that relates habitat design features with behavioral health outcomes such as stress, anxiety, and feelings of isolation. 

Going a step further, the team has visualized these relationships in the form of an interactive online platform. Users can click through to explore connections between design and behavior, such as how a habitat’s layout affects social connection and team cohesion, and how a reconfigurable space can minimize homesickness. 

“The awareness has been there for some time that living in space is difficult,” says Mich Lin, a PhD candidate in the Human Systems Lab and the Engineering Systems Lab at MIT. “We’ve come a long way from the human in a tin can. Asour priorities shift toward long-duration exploration missions, making sure a crew is safe, healthy, happy, and productive becomes even more important.”

The insights that Lin’s team presents, which appear today in the journal npj Microgravity, were assembled after an extensive literature search and expert interviews. They identified many studies on habitat design and its influence on specific behaviors, such as how levels of lighting affect an astronaut’s quality of sleep. But this is the first time that anyone has brought such information together, visualizing the relationships and risks associated with a habitat’s design and an inhabitant’s wellbeing. 

Lin notes that the work can be applied to designing habitats in not only space but also  other extreme, isolated, and confined environments. 

“Submarines, oil rigs, polar expeditions, and even refugee camps or war zones are incredibly stressful environments,” says Lin, who is the study’s lead author. “We try to make this work applicable to a lot of scenarios and identify points of intervention in habitat design to reduce stress in those extreme environments.”

The study’s co-authors include former MIT undergraduate Lu Chen and Professor Katya Arquilla of the University of Colorado at Boulder. Other key contributors to the work include Lauren Blackwell Landon at KBR/NASA, Jeffrey Montes of the space architecture firm Different Systems, and MIT undergraduate Kara Chou. 

Emotional design

The researchers modeled their new design tool after a risk mapping format used by NASA. When designing a spacecraft or habitat for astronauts in space, the agency maps out the associated risks in the form of “directed acyclic graphs.” A DAG resembles a large web of relationships that illustrate how certain habitat or mission features can affect certain mission-relevant outcomes. 

A typical NASA DAG depicts one-way connections between mission constraints, such as “distance from Earth,” to an astronaut’s physical health outcome, such as quality of sleep, cardiovascular impacts, cognitive function, and so forth.  

“By mapping risks, we can identify points of intervention to characterize and mitigate them,” Lin explains. “NASA uses DAGs as a countermeasure to the risky business that is human spaceflight.”

The researchers looked to create a similar DAG format to map risks associated with habitat design, and less tangible behavioral health outcomes, such as stress, boredom, trust, nostalgia, curiosity, and kinship with crewmates. 

The connection between habitat and behavioral health has not been made in this format before,” Lin emphasizes. “So we made those connections for the first time.”

To do so, the team first identified habitat design factors and behavioral health outcomes that would be specifically relevant for living in extreme environments. The researchers looked to multiple resources across aerospace and human factors fields. To prioritize a human-centered perspective, they referenced the “Atlas of the Heart,” written by author, social work researcher, and University of Houston Professor BrenĂ© Brown. In the book, Brown identifies 87 emotions and experiences that define what makes us human. 

“From there, we did a down-selection of which emotions would be the most impactful in our scenario of habitat design in extreme environments,” Lin explains. 

The team zeroed in on 14 main emotions or experiences that they considered behavioral outcomes that could be influenced by habitats in extreme environments. These include anxiety, autonomy, nostalgia, curiosity, fatigue, and kinship.

They then carried out a wide-ranging search through the scientific literature to identify studies relating to habitability in extreme environments. For instance, NASA has carried out extensive research on the effects of lighting on sleep, the resetting of circadian rhythms, and productivity. Other studies have investigated circulation and habitat layout and their effects on privacy, social connection, and crew performance. 

Lin and their colleagues assembled connections and conclusions from numerous studies to create a DAG, or a web of habitat design features, and their downstream effects on aspects of mental, emotional, and social wellbeing. They also solicited feedback from experts across industry, academia, and NASA to evaluate and strengthen the DAG.

They then developed an online platform, dubbed the Human-Environment Connection and Interaction Atlas, or HECIA, as an interactive tool for habitat designers. 

Click and connect

When using the atlas, the team envisions that designers can take either a forward or backward approach. The atlas lays out habitat design elements, and their downstream behavioral connections, in roughly the order in which decisions are made in designing a mission. 

For instance, in designing a spacecraft to journey to Mars, a designer might take a forward approach, and first click on a feature associated with an early design stage, such as “distance from Earth,” knowing that this would be a significant consideration. The atlas would automatically display risks associated with being far from Earth, such as limits to resources such as “food,” “medical capability,” and “family and friends,” and to behavioral health outcomes such as “nostalgia/homesickness.” 

A designer could then take a backward approach. If, for instance, they want to prioritize minimizing nostalgia/homesickness, they could click on the term to reveal design features and ideas that affect and could potentially improve it, such as in this case, “place attachment,” or feeling emotionally attached to a place. Clicking on this term would in turn reveal upstream elements such as “reconfigurability” and “privacy” — design elements that could be put in place to encourate place attachment, and reduce homesickness. 

For every term that a designer clicks on, Lin and their colleagues provide a summary, based on empirical research, that explains both the term in the context of extreme habitats, and provides examples of design interventions. For instance, a designer who is looking for ideas to minimize social isolation on long-duration missions may click on the term, to reveal a description. 

“They may read that research has found ‘access paths, stairs, entrances, contribute to the formation of friendships and social cohesion,’” Lin offers. “So that would give them an idea of connecting public spaces in the habitat, via the private spaces, so people have to mingle, essentially.”

They emphasize that the new platform and the ideas informing it are not a one-size-fits-all for how to design any extreme habitat. That depends on a particular habitat’s specifications and constraints. 

“Rather, this helps you think about connections that might be important, but that aren’t immediately obvious,” Lin says. “As we envision truly becoming an off-planet species, or creating places we want to live in in space, there is so much potential for us to reimagine habitats that make us happy and productive.”

This research was supported, in part, by NASA.

###

Written by Jennifer Chu, MIT News

Monday, August 10, 2026

 

The EU’s answer to Starlink moves one step closer to launch

The IRIS logo on a dark background
Copyright European Space Agency

By Indrabati Lahiri
Published on

Rising geopolitcal volatility and conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine and Middle East war have made it crucial for Europe to invest heavily in its own home-grown satellite network.

The European Union’s attempt to launch its own satellite program have achieved a significant milestone.

The SpaceRISE consortium and the European Commission have now joined forces, signing an implementation agreement for IRIS².

This will be the EU’s flagship secure satellite programme, which will provide government-backed and encrypted communication services for EU institutions, critical infrastructure and emergency responders. It will also provide quantum-secured defence layers and high-reliability routing.

This move comes as several industries continue to rely on Starlink significantly for services like airplane Wi-Fi and drone operations in Ukraine. This could potentially allow the EU to benefit considerably from having its own domestic satellite programme to counter Starlink’s widespread influence.

The recent agreement adds another 66 satellites to the programme, bringing the total number 348. Out of these, 330 will be in Low Earth Orbit and 18 will be in Medium Earth Orbit.

The programme’s first launches are expected to begin in 2029, on a progressive basis.

Its primary users will be European governments and key players from surveillance, defence operations, and critical commercial sectors like transport and energy.

A European satellite network

Rising geopolitical volatility and ongoing conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine and Middle Eastern wars in recent years have made it crucial for Europe to invest more in digital sovereignty and domestic resilience.

As such, instead of trying to be yet another consumer broadband service, like Starlink attempting to compete with networks like T-Mobile and AT&T, IRIS² is built for defence, governments, critical services and security users.

These are the industries that can best help the continent build true resilience. This is particularly important during times of conflict or natural disasters, when cell towers and internet services can be impacted, leaving satellite connectivity the only real option for communication.

However, overreliance on Starlink, or any other foreign company can also cause a host of geopolitical and governance issues for the EU. This is especially following rising EU-US tariff and other tensions in recent years, following the second Trump administration.

SpaceRISE’s members Eutelsat, SES and Hispasat will work with domestic manufacturers on the satellites and ground infrastructure for IRIS², while the European Space Agency will take care of the technical development and validation

Saturday, August 08, 2026

First Russian Sanction Package from the New UK Government

LNG carrier
Demonstrating consistency the new UK government launched its first sanction package including a newly acquired Russian LNG carrier (file photo)

Published Aug 6, 2026 7:02 PM by The Maritime Executive


Two and a half weeks after the newest British government was officially formed, the newly named foreign secretary, Ed Miliband, announced the first Russian sanction package of the new government. The government of the new Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, is attempting to show solidarity and consistency in policy.

The new package is modest in scope but targets the shipping and energy sector as well as banks and what it terms “shady businesses” for their role in supporting the war in Ukraine. A total of 19 listings were added to the sanctions regime.

Miliband emphasized that the first package “reinforced the UK’s commitment to the people of Ukraine by announcing new measures against those supporting the Kremlin’s war effort.” Like their predecessors, the new government said they are continuing to target the networks and revenue streams on which the Kremlin relies.

As part of the effort, the new package is targeting the LNG operations by listing a recently acquired LNG carrier. The vessel, built in Korea, was acquired by Russian interests in May and transferred to the Russian flag as the Arctic Express (IMO 9333591). It is being managed by SMP Techmanagement of St. Petersburg. The 84,000 dwt vessel is reported to already be involved in the transport of Russian gas to third countries. The vessel’s AIS shows that it departed China’s Tieshan on Wednesday, August 5.

The UK also listed an Indian ship management company, Frion Ship Management, that it asserts supported the sale of the Arctic Express into Russian ownership and control. The package follows the latest efforts in the EU, as it lists vessels recently sold into the Russian register, as Europe looks to also crack down on vessel sales to Russia.

The five additional listings include four shadow fleet crude oil tankers reportedly registered in Palau, San Marino, and Barbados. It also included one product tanker registered in Barbados. These vessels join 644 other listings in the UK database of sanctions linked to the shipping sector. 

The other portion of today’s sanctions package includes four companies that the UK says are importing tantalum and niobium, rare metals critical for producing military equipment. It also lists six additional banks.

Miliband, who had been serving until July as Energy Minister in the prior government, highlights that since taking office, he has attended the ASEAN conference in Manila, where they focused on Ukraine, and, along with the Prime Minister, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. He also flew to Washington, D.C., to meet with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to discuss Russia and Ukraine.

The UK highlights that this year alone, it imposed sanctions on over 500 individuals, entities, and ships as part of the Russian sanctions regime. They are attempting to signal that there will be consistency in the effort as the new government moves forward.

Russian Navy Augments its Long-Term Presence in English Channel

NOT A SHADOW FLEET, THE REAL THING

Neustrashimy and her embarked helicopter in friendlier times, exercising alongside NATO forces in the Baltic, 2008 (USN file image)
Neustrashimy and her embarked helicopter in friendlier times, exercising alongside NATO forces in the Baltic, 2008 (USN file image)

Published Aug 5, 2026 8:23 PM by The Maritime Executive



The Russian frigate RFS Neustrashimy (now F722) has settled into its role as the Russian Navy’s piquet ship stationed in the English Channel, suggesting she is a permanent replacement for RFS Admiral Grigorovich (F494), which arrived back in Baltiysk, its home port in the Kaliningrad enclave, on July 16. 

On August 1, the Neustrashimy was seen stationary and tied up alongside the Vishnya Class specialist intelligence collection vessel RFS Vasiliy Tatishchev (SSV-231) close up to the Galloper Wind Farm, 15nm off Clacton and the Suffolk coast.  It is not clear why the Russian Navy has chosen the Galloper Wind Farm as a regular logistics transfer point, possibly because it is difficult to miss as a rendezvous point, or because the wind farm provides some form of protection. 

The two vessels were not seen transferring fuel, although this could have been undetected, but the trans-shipment will have at least included fresh rations. The RFS Vasiliy Tatishchev appears to have come out the Baltic Fleet headquarters at Baltiysk in Kaliningrad to undertake the replenishment task. Hitherto, a full replenishment with fuel has been conducted by the warship tying up alongside the Amur Class base repair ship PM-82, which has now returned home.

 On August 3, the Neustrashimy revealed that it had been hiding a Ka-27 helicopter in its aircraft hangar, a type which this frigate class was designed to carry. The presence on board of a Ka-27 will prove something of a headache for the Royal Navy, as the Russians will now be able to maintain over-watch of two of their dark fleet merchant vessels simultaneously and over a wider area as they transit the English Channel. 

Without calling on the aid of the Sky News helicopter to help with the observation effort (Sky News having spotted a replenishment operation in the same area on July 17), it will make the Royal Navy’s task of keeping an eye on Russian activity more complex.  There is already a mismatch between the Russian capability at sea and their British escorts: often the Royal Navy fields a single minesweeper or patrol vessel, either armed with a 30mm cannon, or sometimes even an unarmed Royal Fleet Auxiliary, and there may now be a need for an onboard helicopter to respond to Russian aerial activity. Moreover, the Russian presence in the Channel and the North Sea now seems semi-permanent.

WAR IS ECOCIDE

Oman’s Turtle Coast Hit by Oil Leaking From the Tanker Caroline Bezengi

tanker aground off Oman
The Caroline Bezengi aground off Jazirat Al Qibliyyah on the Dhofar coast of Oman

Published Aug 4, 2026 5:51 PM by The Maritime Executive

The environmental catastrophe predicted when salvage surveyors inspected the Russian dark fleet Supermax, the Cameroon-flagged Caroline Bezengi (159,168 dwt), beached on rocks off an Omani island, is beginning to unfold.

The Caroline Bezengi was hit by an explosion on June 8 while off the coast of Oman. The tanker had completed a transit of the Suez Canal on May 30 and left the Maritime Security Transit Corridor when the explosion occurred. The crew was taken off without injury some four days later, and the tanker subsequently was driven onto the rocks on the southwest tip of Jazirat Al Qibliyyah, one of the Hallaniyat Islands off the coast of Dhofar in the southwest of Oman. The tanker was laden with oil taken on board at Novorossiysk and was destined for Gujarat. The tanker has a past association with Russian state ship-owner Sovcomflot, and had been sanctioned by the EU, UK, and US (OFAC).

The position of the ship is particularly difficult, and is exposed to heavy seas normal in this Khareef monsoon season. While the ship appears to be grounded on rocks forward, there are outcrops off the port side that could also catch the ship if it shifted. There are also exposed rocks 500 yards off the stern of the ship.

The Omani maritime authorities conducted an onboard survey of the ship on July 12, and noted considerable deterioration in comparison with an aerial survey conducted the prior week, with the ship lower in the water, with a more pronounced list, and liable to break up in heavy weather. The tanker was fully laden except for one tank – this empty tank being the only one apparently not breached, with the remaining tanks all full, showing signs of seawater contamination. Crude leakage into ballast was noted during the on-board inspection, and also into the double hull spacing, the fumes from which were identified as potentially explosive. The survey also identified a feasible plan for off-loading the Caroline Bezengi’s cargo, worth probably over $100 million, via a 1000-yard pipeline to a receiving tanker anchored in safer waters in the lee of the island. The tanker potentially could be refloated as it was lightened, but with all the risks of on-board explosions and the ship breaking up further as the operation progresses.


Local newspapers reported on July 23 that the Omani Ministry of Transport, Communications and Information Technology has issued an urgent 24-hour directive for the owners to remove the vessel. It is not clear if the Ministry received a response from the Chinese registered owners, Rentoor Ship Management, based in Huangpu Qu, Shanghai. But it appears unlikely, as the address appears to be a dead-letter box in a residential block of flats in downtown Shanghai, a typical set-up in the registration particulars of Russian dark fleet tankers. 

 

Jazirat Al Qibliyyah and the Caroline Bezengi (red) on August 2 with possible salvor vessels (green) (Sentinel-2/CJRC)

 

From satellite imagery of Jazirat Al Qibliyyah on August 2, there are indications of several small vessels standing off the wreck in two groups, 1nm to the north and 5nm to the east of the wreck of the Caroline Bezengi. But no unloading operation appears to be underway, and a strong plume of oil can be seen drifting around the island from the wreck and way off towards the north-east. This plume continues in a consistent direction and broadens, such that it would hit the Omani coast between Sharbithat and Ras Madrakah. This is a particularly isolated area, the sea fringed by cliffs and small widths of inaccessible beach, which makes it a perfect coastline for turtles to come ashore and lay eggs without human interference. The sea area offshore is a marine reserve for a number of endangered species, including petrels and the rare Arabian Sea humpback whale. It is not clear if the Omani authorities have yet got a salvage operation underway, and neither the ministry nor the marine salvage firm best equipped to take on the task have responded to enquiries.

 

 
The spread of the oil plume from the Caroline Bezengi, affecting a protected marine reserve and landing on the Omani coast between Sharbithal and Ras Madrakah (Google Earth/CJRC)

The Caroline Bezengi appears to have been a victim of a limpet mine attack, likely orchestrated by Ukraine. Unless the Ukrainians have acquired a long-range naval capability, a limpet mine would most likely have been placed on the ship since leaving Novorossiysk, and when it was at anchor. Ships customarily anchor while waiting to enter the Suez Canal, but also often do so in the As Suways Anchorage on exit as well, to complete procedures. The timing of the explosion, on a predictable course, may have been a warning not to register Russian-owned dark fleet tankers;  39 such vessels currently fly the Omani flag, out of a total ship registry of 43 vessels.
 

Oil Slicks and a Burning Ship Show the Toll of the Hormuz Crisis

Minoan Pioneer, center right, drifts among oil slicks on August 5 (Copernicus / Sentinel-2)
Minoan Pioneer, center right, drifts among oil slicks on August 5 (Copernicus / Sentinel-2)

Published Aug 5, 2026 10:52 PM by The Maritime Executive



Sentinel-2c satellite imagery taken on August 5 off the northern tip of Oman’s Musandam Peninsula shows the extent of damage inflicted on shipping and Oman’s coastline as a consequence of Iranian IRGC drone and anti-shipping cruise missile attacks.

Clearly identifiable both from its length and its color is the 225m container ship, the Liberian-flagged Minoan Pioneer (IMO 9471630). The Minoan Pioneer was attacked on August 3, and her third engineer remains missing. Yesterday this vessel was appearing as a hot spot on NASA FIRMS fire detection satellite imagery. The ship is no longer burning to a degree which shows a red heat signature in FIRMS, but in today’s Sentinel imagery black smoke appears to be still coming off the bow of the ship.

The Minoan Pioneer does not appear to be leaking bunker fuel, and the source is unclear; though the resolution of Sentinel-2 imagery has limits, it is possible that there may be two additional, smaller vessels linked to some of the visible oil plumes (circled in green and yellow).

Royal Navy of Oman locations on Goat Island (left) and Didamar (right), the Minoan Pioneer (red) and two possible small 85m (yellow) and 55m (green) vessels plus oil spills (Sentinel-2c/CJRC)

Tidal flow in the Strait is heavier than within the Gulf, and tends to flow inwards through the north of the Strait and outwards in the southern section. Salinity is lower in the Gulf of Oman than within the Arabian Gulf, but tidal mixing forces are vigorous, quickly evening out the salinity, a tidal mechanism which should help with the dispersal of oil.

Locations where vessels are known to have been struck within Omani territorial waters while transiting the Omani coastal route (Google Earth/CJRC)

There is no evidence in the imagery of any salvage or cleanup activity underway, presumably because any such activity could be vulnerable to IRGC drone or missile attack. At the single point in time of imaging, no warships were identifiable, nor were any ships spotted using the Omani coastal route to either enter or exit the Gulf.

Any cleanup activity undertaken once the military situation permits will be difficult and complex, because the Musandam Peninsula’s fjord-like coastline is both difficult to navigate and typically has no accessible shoreline, its cliffs falling directly into the sea. Given the mountainous terrain, many of the remote fishing communities scattered around the northern and eastern coast are only accessible by sea.


War Risk Insurance Pays $11M for Loss of Mayuree Naree

ship burning in the Strait of Hormuz after attack
Precious Shipping received a payment on its war risk insurance for the loss of the bulker in the Strait of Hormuz (Royal Thai Navy)

Published Aug 7, 2026 12:40 PM by The Maritime Executive



The Thai shipping company Precious Shipping reports it has received a payment of $10.98 million on the war risk insurance related to the bulker Mayuree Naree, which was destroyed during an attack in the Strait of Hormuz. The vessel, which later grounded in Iran, was declared a constructive total loss.

The 30,193-dwt bulker, which was built in 2008, was struck on March 11 by two projectiles. The company said the vessel had been following the safety advisories and was attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz when it was struck at approximately 08:15 local time.

The attack caused a fire on the vessel in the engine room and flooding. A total of 20 of the 23 crew aboard were able to escape the ship and were rescued by the Royal Navy of Oman. They returned to Thailand on March 16.

Three seafarers were missing after the attack. The company had reported at the end of March that a specialized team searched the ship despite difficult conditions, including residual smoke, the fire damage in the engine room and surrounding compartments, and flooding. They were unable to locate the remains of the missing crew, but a second search days later located the crewmembers. The bodies were returned to Thailand at the beginning of July.

After the ship was abandoned, it continued to drift in the Strait. Iranian officials reported the ship had grounded in late March on the other side of the Strait. It was reported on the southern coast of Qeshm Island, north of Larak Island, under the control of the Iranians.

“The group received $10.98 million in war risk insurance proceeds relating to the vessel loss and statutory crew compensation,” the company said in its mid-year financial reports. It said that it had incurred an expense of $1.26 million from the incident, but that there were no cargo claims as the ship was sailing in ballast.

Three of the surviving crewmembers, however, have sued the company in the Labour Court in Thailand. The company acknowledges the suit, which was filed in early July with allegations that the company was not adequately providing for the survivors. The company said it had provided medical examinations, counseling, and psychological support while meeting its contractual obligations. Precious Shipping reports that 17 of the survivors have now returned to work.

The company, however, has a second ship still stuck in the Persian Gulf. It said in March a charter ended for the Hatthaya Naree (39,000 dwt). The Singapore-flagged vessel, which was built in 2015, was fixed on a new time charter on June 24, 2026. However, due to the continuing security situation in the Strait of Hormuz, the vessel remains in the region pending safe onward transit. Precious Shipping reports it has a total of 41 vessels after the loss of the Mayuree Naree.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) listed the Mayuree Naree as one of a total of 64 confirmed incidents in the Strait of Hormuz and the Middle East since March. It calculates that 17 fatalities have been confirmed. There is no confirmed count on how many seafarers remain trapped in the region.


As Hormuz Talks Inch Towards Finish Line, Conflict Heats Up in Yemen

Social media
Strike in progress at a Saudi-backed military outpost in Marib (Saudi social media)

Published Aug 6, 2026 7:49 PM by The Maritime Executive



On Thursday, Iranian-backed Houthi forces launched attacks on the Saudi border city of Najran and the Yemeni government stronghold at Marib, part of a broader pattern of regional escalation. Saudi intelligence suggests that preparations are under way by Iran-backed militias to launch new strikes on Gulf infrastructure and seaports. The new hostilities could complicate delicate plans to negotiate a truce between Iran, its GCC neighbors and the United States. 

Najran is a small oasis city just north of the Yemeni border, and Houthi forces have repeatedly targeted its airport, claiming that the site is being used to launch surveillance drones over Houthi territory. 11 civilians were wounded in the strike on Thursday, Saudi forces said. The area has strategic relevance: In the civil war period, the Najran region was a launchpad for Saudi incursions across the border, and it was the location of a significant Saudi defeat at the hands of Houthi forces in 2019. 

The Marib area is about 80 miles inland from the Houthi capital at Sanaa, and is a gateway to Yemen's oilfields. The strikes on government bases in Marib and nearby regions killed more than 30 government soldiers, Yemeni sources told Al Jazeera - the most significant attacks since the Yemeni ceasefire deal was signed in 2022. The numbers are expected to rise.

Saudi military sources have also reported signs of a possible pending Iranian-backed attack by Houthi groups and Iraqi militias, which possess drone capabilities for long-range strikes on Saudi infrastructure. 

"I think they want to coordinate attacks from both north and south," a Saudi official told CNN, "mostly civilian and economic installations" like seaports and energy facilities - targets which the Houthis have hit before.  

Just yesterday, Houthi spokesman Yahya Saree said that the group would be intensifying its effort to blockade Saudi ports in the Red Sea, and he pledged to counteract Saudi efforts to ship crude northwards through the Suez Canal - where energy logistics would be out of reach of Houthi targeting. 

COMMENT: Iran and the UAE are working together to outlast Trump

COMMENT: Iran and the UAE are working together to outlast Trump
A container ship crosses the Strait of Hormuz. UAE-Iran trade has accelerated even as the wider Gulf war continues. / bne IntelliNewsFacebook
By Ben Aris August 7, 2026

A "truce" between the UAE and Iran, agreed after direct contacts between senior officials in mid-June, is helping both countries manage the fallout of the wider Gulf war and undermining Washington's strategy of economic pressure, Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, founder of the Bourse & Bazaar Foundation, wrote in a note published August 7.

The de-escalation has spared Emirati cities and critical infrastructure from the direct attacks Iran has continued to level at other Gulf states, Batmanghelidj notes, citing a Financial Times report on the truce. The UAE exported more crude through the Strait of Hormuz than any other Gulf producer in July, with supertankers loading from secondary terminals at Zirku and Das islands and smaller vessels conducting ship-to-ship transfers off Fujairah before crossing the strait - a sign, he writes, that the FT's characterisation of the truce as a "bold gamble" is paying off.

Emirati officials deny making direct financial transfers to Iran, and Batmanghelidj is sceptical of reports the UAE paid Tehran "billions of dollars" to halt attacks, arguing any such inflow would show up immediately in Iran's foreign-exchange markets. What Iran needed, he argues, was not cash but the logistical and financial channels to procure goods.

Over 50 container ships crossed between the UAE and Iran in July, according to shipping-data provider Kpler, approaching pre-war levels - feeder services between the Iranian ports of Bandar Lengeh and Bandar Abbas and the Emirati ports of Port Rashid and Jebel Ali, carrying fruit and vegetables out and industrial intermediate goods back. At least eight bulk carriers crossed the strait in the past week to call at Bandar Imam Khomeini, delivering grain and animal feed to a country reliant on imports to cover its food-consumption shortfall; Iranian importers regained the dollar liquidity needed to pay for those cargoes through the UAE's financial system, reversing a block Emirati authorities imposed in early March after the first wave of Iranian strikes on Dubai and Abu Dhabi.

Not appeasement, but interdependence

Batmanghelidj pushes back on Western commentary that frames the UAE's continued economic engagement as a form of appeasement.

"It is a reflection of the deep and long-standing interdependence between the two countries," he writes. "As the war dragged on, Emirati officials needed to mitigate harm to key parts of the economy, ranging from the oil industry to the tourism sector. Likewise, Iranian officials needed to restore critical supply chains, sustaining manufacturing output and safeguarding food security to maintain stability during the war."

He argues the dynamic also explains why a reported Israeli push for a "land blockade" of Iran - convincing regional states to shut border crossings and ports to Tehran - has gone nowhere: neighbouring states' own economic engagement with Iran is what lets them manage the instability created, in his telling, by the Trump administration's oscillation between offering a deal and threatening further strikes.

"Six months on, it is clear that the war has no military solution, only a diplomatic one," Batmanghelidj concludes, framing the UAE's restored trade with Iran as evidence that regional actors, not Washington, are setting the terms of how the conflict actually winds down.