Sunday, June 28, 2026

 

First global assessment of marine ecosystems during a year when warming exceeded 1.5°C



Year‑round ocean heating drives over 200 documented marine ecosystem disruptions




King Abdullah University of Science & Technology (KAUST)

The first global assessment of marine ecosystems during a year when global warming exceeded 1.5°C. 

image: 

The study provides critical evidence of how climate change is reshaping ocean ecosystems and the urgency of accelerating solutions.

view more 

Credit: Image courtesy of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)





Researchers at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) have led one of the first global assessments of how marine ecosystems responded during the first year when global temperatures temporarily exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. 

Healthy marine ecosystems support biodiversity, fisheries, tourism, and economic development around the world, yet scientists have lacked a global picture of how marine life responds when challenged with rising sea temperatures during periods when global warming exceeds 1.5°C — a benchmark identified in the Paris Agreement as important for limiting the most severe impacts of climate change. 

The study analyzed 201 ecological impact events across the world's oceans, drawing on scientific literature, monitoring programs, and documented observations from around the world, to create one of the largest and most comprehensive records assembled to date of marine ecosystem impacts during an unprecedented period of ocean warming.

Published in One Earth, the study documented impacts ranging from coral bleaching and harmful algal blooms to species mortality, habitat disruption, and fisheries impacts.

The study found that impacts were not limited to traditional summer marine heat extremes. While many events occurred during warmer months, researchers identified widespread ecological disruption throughout the year, suggesting that current monitoring and preparedness efforts may overlook important risks occurring outside conventional heatwave seasons. 

Led by researchers at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), the study brought together an international team of scientists who compiled and verified reports from peer-reviewed research, government agencies, environmental organizations, monitoring programs, and news media across 17 languages.

"This study provides a real-world snapshot of how marine ecosystems responded during an exceptional period of ocean warmth," said Dr Shannon Klein, lead author and Research Scientist at KAUST.

"One of the clearest findings was that impacts were not confined to traditional summer heat extremes. We found evidence of ecological disruption across seasons, which suggests that understanding and responding to ocean warming requires year-round monitoring and assessment.”

Researchers found that 98 percent of documented ecological impacts were associated with unusually warm sea temperatures. Many of the documented events involved significant impacts on marine species, habitats, and ecosystems. While unusually warm conditions were linked to the vast majority of documented impacts, the study also identified other drivers, including major storms and other extreme weather events. The findings highlight how multiple environmental pressures can interact to shape the health and resistance of marine ecosystems.

The researchers identified potential patterns of heightened vulnerability and exposure across different ecosystems and regions through the study. While the research was not designed to predict future impacts, the authors note that these patterns may help scientists and policymakers better understand where ecological and socio-economic risks may increase if global warming remains near current levels or continues to increase.

As Saudi Arabia continues to invest in marine conservation and the growth of its blue economy, understanding how ocean ecosystems respond to changing environmental conditions is becoming increasingly important.

"Marine ecosystems are influenced by a combination of factors, including ocean warming and extreme weather events. Studies such as this help us understand those interactions at a global scale while providing knowledge that can support monitoring, conservation, and resilience efforts in regions such as the Red Sea," said Carlos Duarte, Distinguished Professor of Marine Science at KAUST and senior author of the study.

The researchers stress that the study was designed as a rapid assessment of ecological impacts during an unprecedented period of ocean warming, requiring future validation as impacts continue to unfold. They hope the findings will help inform future monitoring systems, preparedness planning, and marine conservation efforts.

The findings highlight the importance of year-round marine monitoring to better understand how ecosystems respond to changing ocean conditions and to support future conservation and management efforts.

 

When old data gains new relevance: Historical study on brain convolutions confirmed after 150 years



Renate Schweizer and her team receive the Replication Prize from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping



Deutsches Primatenzentrum (DPZ)/German Primate Center

Dr. Renate Schweizer with the Replication Award. 

image: 

Dr. Renate Schweizer with the Replication Award from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.

view more 

Credit: Irene Böttcher-Gajewski / Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences





When the Göttingen anatomist Rudolf Wagner examined a brain in 1856 that was later mistakenly believed to be that of the famous mathematician Gauss, he noticed an unknown peculiarity: a connection above the central fissure — which separates two parts of the brain — that he described as a "bridge." Twenty years later, in 1876, the Viennese anatomist Richard Heschl searched more than 1,000 brains for further instances of this "bridge" and was able to identify it in six of them. He also measured an ordinary brain winding at the same location, situated at the base of the fissure, as he suspected a connection between this "deep winding" and the "bridge": if the deep-lying winding occurred at varying heights, the "bridge" should appear at the same location, but at the brain's surface. The data confirmed his hypothesis. 150 years later, researchers from the German Primate Center – Leibniz Institute for Primate Research (DPZ) and the University of Göttingen, led by Renate Schweizer, a scientist in the Department of Functional Imaging at the DPZ, have now replicated Heschl's findings. For their work, Renate Schweizer, together with her co-authors Anna M. Müllen and Julius Stropel, has been awarded the Replication Prize of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping. The article on which the prize is based was published in 2025 in the journal Brain Structure and Function.

The brain of physician C. H. Fuchs leads researchers to the original study

The brain of the physician C. H. Fuchs — in which Rudolf Wagner had first described the extremely rare "bridge" in the central fissure — was most likely accidentally swapped with the brain of C. F. Gauss during scientific work in the 1860s. This mix-up was uncovered in 2013 by Renate Schweizer, and it was precisely the rare "bridge" in the central fissure that provided the crucial clue to the confusion. While researching historical publications, the neuroscientist then came across Richard Heschl's work, published in 1877.

The connection between the "bridge" and the ordinary brain winding

Until the replication study appeared, Heschl's work had been the only one to demonstrate not only how rare the "bridge" in the central fissure was, but also to describe the height distribution of the so-called "deep winding" — present in all brains — at the location of the "bridge." Both findings could only be established through a very large sample. In his "statistical" study, he therefore examined 1,087 brains from deceased patients at the Vienna General Hospital within the space of a year, confirming his hypothesis about the relationship between the two anatomical phenomena.

Renate Schweizer notes that this approach was remarkable: "What is so striking about this historical study is Heschl's surprisingly modern understanding of the large sample as the basis for a 'statistical study.' That is what made replicating it with modern methods particularly exciting."

Heschl's hypotheses confirmed after nearly 150 years — and extended by a possible new influencing factor

Renate Schweizer and her team have now confirmed the connection between the deep-lying convolution in the central fissure and the fully developed "bridge" at the same location. The researchers analyzed structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 1,112 healthy adults from the "Human Connectome Project Young Adult" dataset.

In the first part of the study, Heschl's findings on the occurrence of the "bridge" were replicated using a methodology inspired by his original approach — the visual analysis of complete brains — by generating so-called surface reconstructions from the MRI scans.

While Heschl had originally identified six cases of a "bridge" across the central fissure, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.6 percent, the modern sample yielded nine cases: a slightly higher prevalence of 0.8 percent. This modest increase may be attributable to the modern sample, which consists of 40 percent twins — a composition that also made a new finding possible.

The "bridge" was observed more frequently in twins: in 1.8 percent of fraternal twins and 1.1 percent of identical twins. However, since it is typically present in only one of the two twins, the researchers conclude that the "bridge" is not genetically determined but rather influenced by early environmental factors. Schweizer adds that "the bridged central fissure represents an anatomical variation, not an anomaly, and therefore has no currently known functional consequences — neither in terms of limitations nor enhancements of any abilities."

The second part of the replication involved measuring the height distribution of the "deep winding," for which a new computational method was developed by doctoral researcher Anna M. Müllen. Here too, the researchers found an identical trend to Heschl's results: despite deviations in the absolute numbers — attributable to the greater precision of the modern method — the height distribution of the "deep convolution" showed the same pattern of increases up to just below the brain's surface.

Historical study employed a surprisingly modern approach

In conclusion, Renate Schweizer highlights Heschl's methodological and conceptual foresight, which she considers extraordinarily advanced for his time: "Heschl not only championed and implemented a statistical approach, but also drew on the explanatory power of the height distribution of the 'deep winding' to clarify the relationship between rare and general anatomical structures — a central guiding principle of modern neuroanatomical research."

Prize ceremony of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping in Bordeaux

For their unique combination of historical inspiration and modern methods, Renate Schweizer, together with co-authors Anna M. Müllen and Julius Stropel, received the Replication Prize of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping at the organization's conference, held from 14 to 18 June 2026 in Bordeaux.

 

Study: China reverses widespread freshwater deoxygenation via wastewater management




Chinese Academy of Sciences Headquarters






Freshwater ecosystems worldwide have been suffering from declining oxygen levels—a trend known as deoxygenation—that threatens biodiversity, fisheries, and ecosystem stability. However, a new study published on June 26 in Nature Geoscience offers hope: targeted nutrient management via wastewater control can reverse this trajectory, even in the face of rapid climate warming.

Led by Professor ZHOU Yongqiang from the Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, an international research team analyzed 18 years of monthly data (2005–2022) from 972 rivers and 354 lake sites across China. Their findings challenge the prevailing narrative that aquatic deoxygenation is an unstoppable consequence of human development and global warming.

Although surface waters warmed by 1.2 °C per decade, a rate higher than the global average, the researchers found that dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations increased across China’s inland waters during the 18 years of the study—a phenomenon that is not typically associated with rising water temperatures.

Specifically, DO levels rose by an average of 0.93 mg/L per decade in rivers and 0.38 mg/L per decade in lakes. This recovery led to a dramatic reduction in the incidence of hypoxia (low oxygen) and anoxia (no oxygen), with recorded hypoxic events in rivers falling from 170 occurrences in 2005–2010 to just 25 in 2017-2022.

The primary driver of this remarkable recovery, the team found, was not related to increased photosynthesis from algae, but rather a reduction in organic pollution.

Using variance partitioning and machine learning algorithms (XGBoost), the team found that decreases in biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonium, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were the best predictors of rising DO levels. In contrast, changes in phytoplankton abundance (measured as chlorophyll-a) showed no consistent relationship with DO trends, ruling out algal-driven oxygen supersaturation as a cause for the recovery.

China’s investments in environmental restoration, which surged from 1 trillion to 10 trillion RMB (approximately US$148 billion to US$1.48 trillion) annually between 2000 and 2022, expanded wastewater treatment coverage from 34.3% to 98.1% of the population. This resulted in nationwide declines in BOD, COD, and nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, the study suggested.

“While water temperature remains a strong predictor of oxygen solubility, our models show that reducing oxygen demand through pollution control has more than offset the oxygen loss expected from warming,” ZHOU said.

“The correlations between provincial investment in sewer infrastructure, the volume of wastewater treated, and the magnitude of DO recovery are exceptionally strong,” he added.

The study also highlights where recovery is strongest—small headwater streams and the warm-temperate zones of central China. However, challenges remain in regions dominated by agricultural nonpoint-source pollution.

According to the study, the rapid flushing rates of many Chinese freshwaters likely contributed to the swift response to management, as legacy pollutants stored in sediments were less of a factor than in deeper, stratified lakes.

“These results provide clear optimism for global restoration efforts,” ZHOU said. “Effective water quality management can improve oxygen levels, protecting aquatic life and reducing the risk of deoxygenation while the climate continues to warm.”

 

Virtual reality combined with nerve stimulation improves arm and hand function following a stroke



New multimodal rehabilitation platform developed and successfully tested in a study




Medical University of Vienna






Researchers at the Medical University of Vienna and ETH Zurich have developed a rehabilitation platform for people suffering from the long-term effects of a stroke, which combines virtual reality with targeted sensory nerve stimulation. In a randomised feasibility clinical study with stroke patients, recently published in "Nature Medicine", the new technology contributed to improvements in arm and hand function, as well as in tactile and body awareness. These results open up the prospect of personalised and more accessible rehabilitation that can support patients’ recovery beyond the limits of conventional therapy.

Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Even after intensive early physiotherapy, many stroke survivors continue to live with reduced arm and hand function, impaired sensation and altered body awareness long after the initial event. While conventional rehabilitation can improve motor functions, it often focuses primarily on movement training, instead sensory deficits and body awareness are frequently given insufficient attention. There is therefore a need for more comprehensive rehabilitation strategies.

Personalised training in a virtual environment
To address this need, a research team led by Stanisa Raspopovic (Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, MedUni Vienna) has developed "MultiSensy", a rehabilitation platform for patients with arm and hand impairments following a stroke, which combines immersive virtual reality with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The system turns rehabilitation exercises into interactive virtual tasks designed to train specific arm and hand functions, including reaching, grasping, pinching, and forearm rotation. 

At the same time, electrodes attached to their skin stimulate the nerves in real time, allowing participants to feel virtual objects as if they were physically touching them. Inspired by occupational therapy principles, the games can be adapted to each participant’s impairment level, allowing training to be both targeted and engaging. "Our aim was to go beyond mere movement training," says study leader Stanisa Raspopovic. "After a stroke, patients often have difficulty not only moving the affected limb, but also feeling it and perceiving it correctly. MultiSensy was developed to reconnect movement, sensation and body awareness during rehabilitation." 

The system was tested on 34 patients who had suffered a stroke more than three months before the study. Some participants trained using MultiSensy: they wore VR goggles and performed arm and hand exercises in a digital training environment designed to simulate everyday tasks. The control group received conventional rehabilitation, including physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Both groups completed a three-week rehabilitation protocol consisting of twelve training sessions. The clinical examinations were supported by a team from the Faculty of Medicine in Belgrade.

Improvements in function and body perception 
The study showed greater improvements in arm and hand recovery in participants treated with MultiSensy than in those receiving conventional rehabilitation. In the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper limb, a standard measure of motor impairment after stroke, the MultiSensy group showed nearly twice the improvement observed in the control group. Similar benefits were also seen in the Action Research Arm Test, which evaluates how well patients can use their arm and hand in everyday functional tasks. But motor disability is just a part of the problem. "After a stroke, some patients struggle to feel touch in their affected hand and may even perceive the arm as distorted in size, shape, or position. Participants treated with the new system showed improvements in their sense of touch and in perception of their affected arm," adds lead author Valerio Aurucci (ETH Zurich). Furthermore, the platform collects movement data during training, providing objective indicators of rehabilitation progress. This allows patients’ performance and recovery to be monitored over time, helping clinicians to assess progress more precisely and adapt therapy for each individual.

"The results provide early clinical evidence that immersive virtual reality combined with sensory nerve stimulation can support recovery after stroke, even after months from the event", says Stanisa Raspopovic. "The technology is still at the research stage, and larger clinical trials are needed to confirm its benefits. However, the study opens a promising perspective for future personalised and potentially home-based stroke rehabilitation."

 

 

Do animal behavior experiments give us a distorted view of cooperation?



More realistic experiments reveal a different side of animal social behaviour



Utrecht University, Faculty of Science

Changing cooperation networks 

image: 

When only one cooperation device was available, almost all cooperation took place between two young males (left). When three or five devices were offered, cooperation became much more evenly distributed throughout the group.

view more 

Credit: Utrecht University






When biologists study cooperation in animals, they usually offer just a single task at a time. But what happens when animals can choose between several opportunities to work together? Biologists at Utrecht University discovered that this can make a remarkable difference. Their findings raise a broader question: do many behavioural experiments offer only a limited view of how animals actually behave in the wild?


Behavioural scientists often study cooperation using a simple experiment. Two animals must pull ropes simultaneously to obtain a reward. Usually, only one such apparatus is placed in front of the enclosure.

This resembles situations in nature in which a group of animals cooperates to capture a single prey item. But for many primates, such situations are relatively rare. Much more often, monkeys spend their time foraging for food in trees and shrubs, where several food sources are available at the same time.

Changing social dynamics
“When monkeys gather to obtain food, they usually have more than one opportunity in nature,” says primatologist Liesbeth Sterck, who led the study. “A fruit tree does not contain just one place where fruit is available, but many. That allows animals to avoid one another, observe one another, or actively seek each other out. But when there’s only a single opportunity to obtain food, the social dynamics are very different.”

According to Sterck, this means researchers should be cautious when drawing conclusions from experiments that offer only one place to cooperate. Such experiments mainly show how animals behave when there is only a single opportunity available. Once several opportunities are introduced, partner preferences can change.

From one dominant duo to an entire group
Sterck’s team discovered this while studying a group of long-tailed macaques. Instead of offering the monkeys just one cooperation device, they sometimes provided three or even five.

When only one device was available, it was almost entirely occupied by two adolescent males. They accounted for the vast majority of cooperative interactions in the group to obtain a food reward.

But when three or five devices became available, the social dynamics changed dramatically. Cooperation became much more evenly distributed throughout the group. The two males remained active, but they no longer dominated the task. They also began cooperating with other group members.

“When there is only one place to cooperate, you create a very specific situation,” says Sterck. “That does not mean previous studies using this setup were wrong. But it does mean that our interpretation of the animals’ behaviour may depend strongly on how many opportunities they are given.”

The peppernut principle
Sterck uses a typically Dutch example to explain the effect: the Sinterklaas celebration, during which small spiced biscuits known as “pepernoten” are thrown into crowds of children.

“During Sinterklaas celebrations, these treats are scattered over a large area, and not offered to the children in one single spot,” she says. “That reduces competition and prevents arguments among children. We see something similar in our study. When there are several places where rewards can be obtained, the behaviour of the group changes.”

Hunting in the wild
Biologist Jeroen Zewald, who conducted the study as a biology student at Utrecht University, compares the findings to hunting in the wild.

“Imagine hunting deer together when there is only a single animal available,” he says. “You want a partner who is good at hunting but who will not keep the entire reward afterwards. If there are prey animals everywhere, it matters much less whom you choose to cooperate with. The monkeys showed exactly this difference.”

The findings underline how strongly social behaviour depends on the surrounding environment. Animals themselves do not solely determine whom they cooperate with; the opportunities available to them matter as well.

Implications beyond animal cooperation
The researchers believe the findings may have consequences far beyond studies of cooperation.

Many other behavioural experiments, including studies of social learning and animal culture, also rely on a single location or a single apparatus. This may limit the opportunities animals have to observe one another, learn from one another, or participate in the task.

If we want to understand how animals cooperate in the wild, we may also need to pay more attention to how many opportunities they have to do so, the researchers conclude.

The study was published today in the journal Animal Behaviour.