Showing posts sorted by date for query PROJECT 2025. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query PROJECT 2025. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, June 13, 2026

“Competitive Authoritarianism” as a Nice Way for Academics to Not Say Fascism



 June 12, 2026

Image by Markus Spiske.

The phrase “competitive authoritarianism” has become a common go-to way for liberal and leftish academics, pundits, journalists, and “activists” to foolishly avoid using the scary “F-word” – fascism – to describe the exterminist Trump regime, movement, and party.

Here is a summary of the phrase’s meaning and inception from National “Public” Radio’s All Things Considered last month:

“Some experts say the United States is no longer a liberal democracy[1], but operating under a system called ‘competitive authoritarianism’Competitive authoritarian countries have democratic rules and hold competitive elections, but the party in charge uses various tactics to tilt the electoral playing field in its favor to maintain power. Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard …and Lucan Way – now a professor at the University of Toronto – came up with it in 2002 to describe systems in countries such as Serbia, Kenya and Peru. ‘We never – when we coined this term 25 years ago – never imagined that we would apply it to the United States…When we began to see the Justice Department go after people who were public critics of Trump, when we began to see lawsuits against (the) media or attacks on universities that are viewed as critical of the government,’ said Levitsky, ‘all these things are raising the cost of opposition.’ …To describe these kinds of political systems, Way and Levitsky initially came up with the phrase, ‘Contested Autocracy.’ Way admits it was a ‘horrible’ term. Then, in conversation, Way’s faculty adviser, Harvard professor Timothy Colton, unwittingly provided a eureka moment. He misremembered the concept as ‘competitive authoritarianism’…‘So, we thought, “Oh my God, that was it!,” Way recalled…The term is catching on. Since President Trump took office last year, searches on Google Trends for competitive authoritarianism have spiked. It has also shown up in scores of publications, from the Ventura County Star in California to The Scotsman in Edinburgh and The Indian Express in Mumbai.”

In a 2020 Journal of Democracy essay, Levitsky and Way defined competitive authoritarianism as “the coexistence of meaningful democratic institutions and serious incumbent abuse, yielding electoral competition that is real but unfair.”

“Oh my God,” indeed…as in “oh my God what a pile of vapid, bloodless and academic softening and avoidance!” Levitsky and Way’s term drains Trump, Trumpism, the Trump regime, and MAGA of their drivingly venomous, ferocious, and interwoven counterrevolutionary sociopolitical and ideological life bloods: genocidal racism, militant patriarchy, xenophobic and palingenetic ultra-nationalism, cruelty, irrationality, violence, cultism, hyper-militarism, power madness, anti-intellectualism, anti-socialism, and political eliminationism, all bound up with a relentless campaign to impose a new form of governance beyond the previously normative rule of law, parliamentary deliberation, electoral “democracy” and constitutional checks and balances.

Compare Levitsky and Way’s tepid language with the brilliant left academic Henry Giroux’s recent and far more serious, properly chilling reflections on the dystopian Trump nightmare:

“[Trumpism’s] fascist politics [involve]…the transformation of the state into an instrument of domestic terrorism… this culture of corruption and authoritarian spectacle converges with a politics that glorifies militarism, violence, and hypermasculine domination. One of the driving forces behind…the Trump regime is the fusion of toxic militarism, white Christian nationalism, and a hypermasculine politics that glorifies violence, domination, and war. This deadly convergence is visible in Trump’s appeals to divine authority, biblical rhetoric, and crusader imagery used to justify military aggression and war-crime-level violence in Iran. It also appears in the militarized language of [the open Christian Fascist – PS] Pete Hegseth, Trump’s self-styled ‘Secretary of War,’ for whom war becomes a theater of masculine redemption in which cruelty is defined as a badge of strength. Hegseth’s swaggering militarism might appear absurd were it not tied to the power of the state and its capacity to unleash violence at home and abroad… his rhetoric is steeped in ‘Islamophobia, misogyny, and a distinctly toxic version of masculinity,’ a poisonous language that turns militarism into a spectacle of aggression while elevating authoritarian brutality into a model of national identity and civic virtue.

The Trump regime’s goals go far beyond “tilting the electoral playing field in its favor to maintain power.” It seeks nothing less than the takeover and makeover of American government and society on fascist – racist, sexist, nativist, fundamentalist, violent, and brutally hierarchical (“traditional”) — lines. It is a bold, fearsome, fast-moving, and unremitting counterrevolutionary project ready, willing, and able to kill, poison, torture, deport, and maim on a mass scale as part of a crusading war against decency, dissent, deliberation, science, rationality, livable ecology, and humanity at home and abroad. Its vile racist and nativist concentration, torture, and death camps are expanding along with the fascist machinery for rounding up brown-skinned people from coast and coast. In one such ICE camp, Delaney Hall in New Jersey, conditions are so miserable that the inmates have started a hunger strike that Trump’s henchman of a “Border Czar” Tom Homan has threatened to end with the international human rights crime of forced feeding.

Yes, death camps. According to the Associated Press last week:

“Immigration and Customs Enforcement will no longer report deaths of detainees who have recently been released from its custody… Dr. Homer Venters, former chief medical officer of the New York City jail system [says that] ‘eliminating reporting of these deaths represents a willful act of ignoring the most serious health outcome that can reflect inadequacies in care or help track outbreaks.’ ICE detainees routinely die at hospitals where they are taken for treatment after their conditions deteriorate inside detention facilities…The decision to limit death reporting comes as a greater number of ICE detainees have been dying. At least 18 detainees have died since Jan. 1, which is on pace to surpass last year’s death toll, which was the highest in two decades. Detainees are dying by suicide at an unprecedented pace, and experts say many other deaths from natural causes likely would have been preventable with timely medical care…Dr. Sanjay Basu, a University of California-San Francisco epidemiologist who recently published an analysis of more than 270 ICE custody deaths, said the policy change will ‘make the mortality statistics appear lower without any actual improvement in care. The period immediately following release is when deaths attributable to inadequate care during confinement become apparent,’ he said. ‘Missed diagnoses, interrupted medications, untreated infections, and decompensating chronic conditions don’t always kill someone while they’re still in the building.’”

Meanwhile, the Trump regime and party are not simply trying to tilt the playing field of elections, they are trying to blow the field up. They are bidding to exterminate any hint of effective opposition not just on the “radical Left” (fascism’s classic ideological bête noire) but first of all in their own party and in the other leading capitalist-imperialist party — the dismal Weimar Dems, who Trump absurdly calls (in one of many signs of his fascist essence) “radical Left.”

Look at how wildly indifferent the Trump regime is to its deranged and demented cult leader’s incredible sinking popularity, now below his previous nadir after January 6. Herr Trump recently said that the financial situation of the American people does not concern him right now and that the federal government can’t afford Medicare, Social Security, and “day care” anymore because it has to pay for wars. Trump ordered his Internal Revenue Service and his Department of Justice (the latter under the control of his personal attorney Todd Blanche) to create a wildly menacing and corrupt “deal” whereby US taxpayers grant vast sums to the January 6 putschists who Trump pardoned while he and his family are immunized from civil penalty for past, present, and future tax crimes.

Look at how Trump launched his insane, reckless, incompetent, and wildly unpopular, mass-murderous war on Iran. Unlike the George W. Bush administration before its criminal imperialist invasion of Iraq, Trump hasn’t bothered to even pretend to make a serious case to the American people or Congress for this criminal fascist war.

These is exceedingly unpopular and impolitic conduct, not what would be expected from an administration that takes electoral competition seriously, consistent with a dictatorial determination to do far more to future elections than merely tilt the field. Does anyone really believe that the tyrant who attempted a coup and pardoned the J6 insurrectionists will respect any election his regime loses?

Never forget that Donald “Take Down the Metal Detectors” Trump wanted the Capitol Riot to include Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters and other neo-Confederate Amerikaner fascists armed with military assault weapons.

And never forget what Trump said to 800-plus US military “flag officers,” mainly generals and admirals, he ordered to Quantico, Virginia from across the US Empire last September 30th: that the nation’s top adversary is “the enemy within,” meaning his domestic political critics and opponents. Trump told the brass in Quantico that US cities should be used as training grounds for foreign wars. (Then his Christian fascist Pentagon chief told the generals and admirals that the military should ignore international human rights and wartime law and privileges “maximum lethality” over “tepid legality”).

In other news, the Trump fascist[2] regime has constructed the faux-legal basis for the jailing and murder of any Americans who dissent from capitalism, imperialism, traditional gender relations, white supremacy, nativism, and fascism. In a cover letter atop the regime’s new Counterterrorism Strategy issued last May 6th, Trump tells those who question “American values” that “we will find you and kill you.”

The Trump regime held a nauseating orgy of Christian white nationalist fascism on the National Mall last Sunday. This White House-backed, evangelical-dominated event promoted the revanchist notion of the United States as “one Christian nation under God” and heralded the monumentally corrupt, multiply accused rapist and pedophile Trump as the nation’s divinely ordained leader. By one on-the-ground account, “This was a nine-hour, full-throated declaration of intention to put this country under Christian fascism and (despite the fact that there were numerous Black and brown people performers and speakers) open white supremacist rule based on the notion that God delivered this country to its founders… they are rewriting history in the service of the fascist remaking of society.”

The liberal-beloved imperialist historian Timothy Snyder is not wrong to warn that Trump may want his war on Iran to spark terrorist attacks the regime can use as a pretext to declare a state of emergency and cancel the mid-term elections.

“Competitive authoritarianism” doesn’t remotely capture the horror of what we and the world are facing with the fascist Trump-Vance-Miller-Vought-Roberts-Rubio-Ellison-Hegseth-Musk-Homan-Blanche-Mullen-Bezos-Cook-Zuckerberg-Abbott-DeSantis-Kavanaugh-FOX News regime.

ENDNOTES

+1. Someone should tell N“P”R that United States wasn’t a “liberal democratic” or any other kind of democratic system prior to the rise of Trump’s “competitive authoritarianism.” It was, as numerous credible political and social scientists have shown, a corporate-dominated imperial plutocracy/oligarchy synergistically linked to an archaic constitutional order that Levitsky and his colleague Daniel Ziblatt have shown to be a “minority rule” structure designed for propertied elites to “consistently thwart and even rule over popular majorities.” It was, in Marxist/scientific terms, a specifically bourgeois form of democracy, one matched to and constrained, contained, and conditioned by the underlying rule of capital.

+2. Fascism is a violent counter-revolutionary movement advancing a lethal, illegitimate, and dictatorial form of government rooted in and advancing virulent racism, toxic patriarchy, xenophobic nationalism, and traditional hierarchical values. I endorse the following concise definition of fascism on the Website of the US-based organization Refuse Fascism:

“Fascism is a qualitative change in how society is governed. Fascism foments and relies on xenophobic nationalism, racism, misogyny, and the aggressive re-institution of oppressive ‘traditional values.’ Fascist mobs and threats of violence are unleashed to build the movement and consolidate power.

Fascism has direction and momentum. Dissent is piece by piece criminalized. The truth is bludgeoned. Group after group is demonized and targeted along a trajectory that leads to real horrors. All of this has taken dramatic leaps under the Trump MAGA regimes.

What is crucial to understand is that once in power fascism essentially eliminates traditional democratic rights. No matter how it comes to power, fascism is never legitimate. History has shown that fascism must be stopped before it becomes too late.”

For my two best efforts to synopsize the soul-chilling fascism at the heart of this horrific regime, situation, and moment, see Paul Street, “A Declaration of Independence From Trump’s Fascist America,” Common Dreams, July 4, 2025; Paul Street, “What Would it Take?,” CounterPunch, May 15, 2026. My 2021 book This Happened Here: Amerikaners, Neoliberals, and the Trumping of America showed how the Trump45 regime matched the best definitions of fascism. Trump 2.0 makes Trump 1.0 look mild by comparison.

Paul Street’s latest book is This Happened Here: Amerikaners, Neoliberals, and the Trumping of America (London: Routledge, 2022).





The Beautiful Game Meets the Border Guard


 June 12, 2026

Somali World Cup soccer referee, Omar Artan, who was banned from entry into the US. Photo: Omar Artan’s Facebook page.

I know Pete Hegseth put his foot in his mouth and took his eye off the ball on a beach in Normandy the other day when, during a D-Day anniversary gathering, he declared: “Sadly, today, different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies.”

Critics described the speech as grotesque and inappropriate for such a solemn and commemorative occasion. Yet if Hegseth was trying to project an image of a vigilant and uncompromising America, events surrounding the World Cup have suggested that message is being heard rather more widely than intended.

A winger receives the ball on the touchline and, with three defenders converging, pirouettes through.

You know something is amiss when a World Cup referee is denied entry to the United States while Canada and Mexico appear to present no such obstacles.

That is what happened when Somali match official Omar Artan was refused entry because of “vetting concerns”. I do not know the details of the case, but after arriving at Miami International Airport on a diplomatic passport, Artan was stopped by US Customs and Border Protection. Nor was this any ordinary referee. Artan—widely regarded as Africa’s leading official—was the recipient of the 2025 CAF Men’s Referee of the Year award. He was an esteemed professional effectively shown the red card by one of the tournament’s host nations and held for eleven hours. Perhaps it was naive of him to think there would be no problems given that around eighty per cent of Somali visa applications are refused.

It did not end there.

Aymen Hussein, the Iraqi international nicknamed Abu Tubar, was reportedly subjected to more than six hours of questioning upon arrival in the United States. He was eventually allowed entry, but Iraq’s team photographer was not. This is not how to win friends and influence people. Every footballing nation follows its team to the World Cup. Support staff are part of that travelling football family too.

Elsewhere, Uzbekistan’s players faced much longer visa processing times than the Dutch players they happened to be playing in a pre-tournament friendly. Such unequal treatment breeds not only frustration but resentment. The online backlash was immediate.

A playmaker threads a pass through a forest of legs.

For a tournament that prides itself on bringing the world together, these incidents send precisely the opposite message. Football’s greatest competition is supposed to transcend borders, politics and prejudice. Instead, too many teams have found themselves confronting bureaucracy, suspicion and barriers before they have even stepped onto the pitch.

Even if this is intended to signal that America’s borders are secure and uncompromising, it is not a good look for any host nation. Nor is it in keeping with the spirit of the World Cup.

Nor were those isolated incidents.

Swiss striker Breel Embolo found his visa placed under review and was unable to join his teammates until several days after the rest of the squad had assembled. Perhaps less surprisingly, given renewed tensions between Washington and Tehran, the Iranian national team spent days navigating visa procedures through the US consulate in Turkey. Entry permissions were reportedly limited to match-day requirements, while a significant number of delegation members were denied visas altogether.

South Africa’s national team also arrived later than planned after visa complications affected members of its travelling party. The episode inevitably raised awkward questions. At a time when Washington was publicly welcoming selected groups of South African migrants and refugees, critics wondered whether footballers from parts of the Global South were being afforded the same urgency and consideration.

A full-back races shoulder to shoulder with an attacker and then, at precisely the right moment, hooks the ball away.

The stories kept coming.

Members of the Uzbekistan squad reportedly faced unusually intrusive security procedures, including searches involving bomb-sniffing dogs. Images and video footage of this circulated internationally, attracting considerable attention and criticism.

Supporters from Europe have not been entirely immune either. Some Scottish fans who qualified for visa-free travel under the ESTA programme saw their authorisations revoked shortly before departure. Others, having already purchased match tickets and accommodation, found themselves unable to travel after visa applications were delayed or rejected, leaving them substantially out of pocket.

The Senegalese delegation experienced repeated secondary inspections and extensive searches at ports of entry, disrupting preparations. Staff members complained of humiliating treatment and some openly alleged racial bias in the way they had been handled.

Behind the headlines were dozens of less-publicised cases. Coaches, medical staff, analysts, interpreters and team officials encountered visa delays that prevented them from travelling with their squads. Family members of players found themselves unable to attend the tournament because applications remained unresolved or were rejected outright.

A striker rounds the goalkeeper with a touch so measured.

Taken individually, each case could be dismissed as an administrative complication or security precaution. Collectively, however, they painted a different picture: a tournament in which access appeared unevenly distributed and in which nationality often seemed to determine how smoothly one crossed the border.

Whether that perception is entirely fair became almost beside the point. Perception matters in international sport. The World Cup is supposed to be football’s greatest celebration of openness and global participation. Instead, stories of delayed visas, lengthy interrogations, missed flights and disrupted preparations threaten to become an unwelcome subplot to the tournament itself.

For FIFA, the question is an uncomfortable one: what is the point of awarding the world’s biggest sporting event to a host nation if some of the world’s players, officials, staff and supporters struggle simply to get through the front door?

A winning goal arrives after twenty passes.

Peter Bach lives in London.


World Cup watchers loudly boo US during National Anthem

CANADIANS, EH

Bennito L. Kelty
June 12, 2026 
RAW STORY


Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group D - United States v Paraguay - Los Angeles Stadium, Inglewood, California, U.S. - June 12, 2026 Volunteers parade the flags of participating nations during the opening ceremony before the match IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters/Gary Vasquez

World Cup audiences showed their anger with the United States by booing renditions of the Star-Spangled Banner.

Canadian spectators at a watch party jeered nonstop during the U.S. National Anthem at the opening of the U.S. versus Paraguay match in Los Angeles, according to a social media video.

Those boos followed heckling and hissing as the U.S. flag came out during the opening ceremony of the Canada versus Bosnia match in Toronto earlier in the day, per more video.


Trump was notably booed during his appearance at Madison Square Garden when the Knicks played the Spurs during Game 3 of the NBA Finals.