Monday, August 10, 2026

‘Must Be Done’: Sanders Calls for Ban on Super PAC Spending in Democratic Primaries​

“I would hope that we can all agree that Republican special interests should not play a role in determining the outcome of Democratic primaries. The time to act is now.”



US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks at a rally on July 18, 2026 in Detroit, Michigan.
(Photo by Sarah Rice/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Aug 10, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday urged national Democratic leaders to impose a total ban on super PAC spending in primary contests, a change that the progressive senator said is necessary to prevent corporate interests from heavily influencing the party’s electoral outcomes.

In a letter addressed to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote that “what is particularly obscene is not only the outrageous amount of money coming into Democratic primaries from billionaire-funded super PACs, but the reality that these special interests have no particular desire to see Democrats win.”

Sanders, who caucuses with the Democratic Party, cited as a telling example the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s $30 million intervention in the Democratic primary for a critical US Senate seat in Michigan. The organization, known as AIPAC, spent heavily to boost Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) and attempt to tear down her progressive opponent, Abdul El-Sayed—who went on to win the race despite being massively outspent.

AIPAC is now reportedly planning to spend big in support of El-Sayed’s Republican general election opponent, Mike Rogers.

“It is absurd that they spend tens of millions of dollars to try to determine who the Democratic nominee is and, if they fail, then proceed to support the Republican candidate in the general election,” Sandres wrote. “That is not democracy. That is not what Democratic voters want.”

Sanders emphasized his support for passage of a constitutional amendment to repeal the US Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which paved the way for the establishment and proliferation of super PACs—entities that can raise and spend unlimited sums supporting or opposing political campaigns.

“BUT WE DO NOT HAVE TO WAIT,” Sanders wrote in all caps. “Right now, the Democratic Party has the power to prohibit super PACs from participating in its primaries. That can be done. That must be done. I urge you to take action and make clear that the Democratic Party will no longer maintain this corrupt system.”

“While there are ideological differences of opinion within the big tent of the party, I would hope that we can all agree that Republican special interests should not play a role in determining the outcome of Democratic primaries,” the senator continued. “The time to act is now.”

The DNC has repeatedly faced calls in recent years to curb or eliminate the influence of super PACs in Democratic primaries—but has yet to take concrete action.

Earlier this year, the DNC Rules Committee rejected a proposed resolution that condemned the “growing influence” of AIPAC and other organizations pumping huge sums into Democratic primaries. The rules panel instead advanced a resolution broadly condemning dark money and expressing the DNC’s “commitment to campaign finance practices that align with the party’s core values.”

Nearly a third of all corporate political spending on elections since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling has come during the 2026 election cycle, according to a June report by Public Citizen.

“Cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, Big Tech, and online betting corporations have collectively spent $294 million to influence federal elections in the 2026 midterm cycle, reflecting a strategic move to spend directly on political action committees to influence federal elections,” the report found. “These corporate super PAC political contributions make up 57% of the $517 million that corporations have reported spending on the 2026 midterms so far.”

No comments: